(Institute Youtube Update)
We are reorganizing our Youtube page to emphasize our conference speakers (too many to list), our video content producers (John Victor, Rob McMullan, etc), and our Authors (ex: Luke Weinhagen, Noah Revoy, etc).
Breaking the fourth wall so to speak. ;)…
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-12 17:42:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734629900609273976
Working on a response. Hopefully it will explain the tribal vs post-tribal nature of our civilizations and how western ethics arose from our homogeneity and middle eastern (semitic) from their heterogeneity – thus illustrating why multiculturalism is the worst possible political…
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-11 17:51:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734269749192782122
Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1734258535519920267
We are working as hard as we can to finish the books and get at least the Overview and the Constitution published. The Science will take a bit longer – it’s much more work.
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-09 20:17:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1733581732169896128
Reply addressees: @JaredAberach
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1733567764319887634
Yes this is my project: “formal operational construction of the logics of the hierarchy of disciplines from first principles produced by the procss of of evolutionary computation.”
(Cardinal > Ordinal > Natural > Operational)
Yes, I think as you do in geometry and we begin with geometry as the first logic (grammar).
Instead of notations (symbols) we use operational grammar (essentially programming language) because it’s easier to read but ‘wordy’.
But yes it is reducible to notation (for those of us who are supernerds at least).
I (we) focus on publishing books instead of papers, and we are trying to get the first book out the door.
So we work with one first principle, a hierarchy of rules of ternary logic, each describing the exprssion of ternary logic, and we work with a set of rules of operational grammar that basically convert sentences into statements of equilibriuim.
So yes. We say (i say) it looks like english but it’s just math or programming.
Reply addressees: @MindEnjoyer
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-13 11:52:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1724032567668551680
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1723968724363874387
(NLI SITE UPDATE)
I’ve updated the home page to remove the ‘broken’ links while we work on the new content, and put the full text on the page, as well as a banner asking for patience as we move content onto the website.
Hopefully this will cut down on complaints. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 19:46:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719802994223370746
That said, it’s all live online. It’s a bit hard to find by design. Because we work on it live – meaning it’s always visible for those who are willing to pursue it. But as usual most people get lost very easily. It’s really too much for anyone without guided instruction. And we need the pamphlet (outline or summary) the science and the law to do that. The other books just make it easier to understand. and the Prosecution volume is a rather harsh suit against the enemeis for their war against our people.
Reply addressees: @__Maneuver
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 18:29:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716159736482017280
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716158160728150517
The Pamphlet (of the Laws of the Universe)
Screenshot of the section we’re turning into a short book for quick reference and and overview of the laws of the universe.
This is not eitehr (a) the full science or (b) the constitution.
We will produce the constitution next, and the… https://t.co/CaPPn22hqe
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 18:16:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716156574358544591
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716151969528565913
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
(NLI Update)
This morning Brad and I wrote the introduction to the summary of The Laws – what we internally call ‘The Pamphlet’ – which just lists the ternary logic and laws four all four of the sciences from physics to group evolutionary strategies.
We had originally included a section in The Science volume called ‘the synthesis’ – which would hold this overview. But both our followers and brad in particular felt we needed to publish something sooner that was enough of an overview that our people could begin to evangalize with -and which would establish our academic credibility.
As for the content, Brad has been consistent in keeping the negativas out of it, especially the conflict of civilizations we’re currently embroilded in at the same time as the conflict of the sexes – which is a double whammy for us.
At present I’m not sure where we’ll put the European vs Semitic vs Asian conflict section – whether in the Science volume or possibly the Persecutions volume. The sex differences in conflict and lying is in the Science volume. And I suspect that’s the best place to put it.
I’m not quite settled on this. Because most people, at least the conservatives, want and need the science of the feminine-semitic devolutionary vs masculine european evolutionary content most of all because it’s the cause of the crisis of our age.
Because the semitic and underclass instinct whether in rome and christianity, or in marxism and class warfare (again), and semitic and feminine warfare (again) in the present age are always the problem in every era destroying each civlization it touches.
Any deep and considered thoughts would be appreciated.
Remember we’re thnking of moving markets (factions) not just what you want. But what our people need to achieve a desired end.
Cheers
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1716151969528565913
(NLI Update)
This morning Brad and I wrote the introduction to the summary of The Laws – what we internally call ‘The Pamphlet’ – which just lists the ternary logic and laws four all four of the sciences from physics to group evolutionary strategies.
We had originally included a section in The Science volume called ‘the synthesis’ – which would hold this overview. But both our followers and brad in particular felt we needed to publish something sooner that was enough of an overview that our people could begin to evangalize with -and which would establish our academic credibility.
As for the content, Brad has been consistent in keeping the negativas out of it, especially the conflict of civilizations we’re currently embroilded in at the same time as the conflict of the sexes – which is a double whammy for us.
At present I’m not sure where we’ll put the European vs Semitic vs Asian conflict section – whether in the Science volume or possibly the Persecutions volume. The sex differences in conflict and lying is in the Science volume. And I suspect that’s the best place to put it.
I’m not quite settled on this. Because most people, at least the conservatives, want and need the science of the feminine-semitic devolutionary vs masculine european evolutionary content most of all because it’s the cause of the crisis of our age.
Because the semitic and underclass instinct whether in rome and christianity, or in marxism and class warfare (again), and semitic and feminine warfare (again) in the present age are always the problem in every era destroying each civlization it touches.
Any deep and considered thoughts would be appreciated.
Remember we’re thnking of moving markets (factions) not just what you want. But what our people need to achieve a desired end.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 17:58:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716151969348263936
NATURAL LAW INSTITUTE LEGAL CONSTITUTIONAL POLICY REFORMS
–Q: Curt: “Are the Reforms ready to go?”–
Not in publicly digestable form, but yes the list exists and is partly visible. It’s just overwhelming in it’s current form and we have to create a bulleted list that refers to… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1713377873543762293
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 16:24:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714678956958331014
Not in a form ready for consumption, no. Dr Werrell convinced me to restructure the work that I had begun with the logics – but was too hard for people to learn – and instead start with the science and evolutionary computation, which made the rest of the work much easier to learn and pushed the logic later into the cirriculum.
So that work has taken two years so far, during which I’d been ill with long covide and a difficult respiratory system infection. I’m pushing through some legal nonsense at the moment but the team and have otherwise been working seven days a week at least two to three hours together, to produce the new draft. Assuming my health cooperates we should be publication ready within six months to a year. But we will put the content up in sections as we produce the draft so that our followers can keep pace. That’s why we record all the videos – to keep everyone informed on our progress.
If you want to go through the Foundations, Method, and Choice videos on YT then you can probably get a better sense of what we’re doing.
Reply addressees: @Adc_Van_Dimsal @_amitbehere
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-11 17:04:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712152163621777408
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1712110585641353341