Abrahamism: False Promise, Bait into Hazard, Pilpul, Critique, Praise False Heroes.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-04 16:21:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1135944682163318787
Form: Outline
-
Correspondence (Realism)(Military, Rule) Pragmatism (Realism) (Commerce, Working
Correspondence (Realism)(Military, Rule)
Pragmatism (Realism) (Commerce, Working Classes)
Coherence (Idealism)(Priesthood, Education)
Utilitarianism (Postmodernism) (Activism, Underclasses)
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-28 12:25:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133348529622126593
-
WHAT WILL YOU DO?1. I will close with the enemy.2. I will seek out the enemy for
WHAT WILL YOU DO?1. I will close with the enemy.2. I will seek out the enemy for the people who will close with the enemy, and cover those that close with the enemy.3. I will defend egress and exit of those that close with or seek out the enemy.4. I will run supplies to those that close with the enemy, seek out the enemy, or defend egress and exit to those that do.5. I will build defenses, feed, and heal those that close with the enemy, seek out the enemy, defend egress and exit to those that do, or run supplies to those that do.6. I will scavenge for anything possible that is needed by those that close with the enemy, seek out the enemy, defend egress and exit to those that do, run supplies to those that do,or build defenses, feed, and heal those that do.
WHAT WILL YOU DO?
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-15 21:57:50 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/10637267057148088
-
BUILDING NUMBERS SUFFICIENT TO WIN —The question is how are we going to build
BUILDING NUMBERS SUFFICIENT TO WIN
—The question is how are we going to build an alliance capable of actually winning?—
0) acknowledging the groups and their incentives – and that their frames are not alterable.1) producing material incentives (policy) that cross frames and even boundaries (gain the middle)2) varying anything necessary above to obtain power.3) seizing a window of opportunity that crosses boundaries.4) being the only people left standing with a solution that crosses boundaries.
One does not, if one is a general of any merit, attempt to produce a given outcome, only to produce any outcome among the set of possible and probabilistic outcomes.
One does not propose that which generates resistance by the people, only the state.
Napoleon was a genius because he prepared like hell to seize opportunity. Everyone else of merit other than sun tsu has used technology, or resources, or both. He took an unregulated peasantry and muskets and mobilized an entire country to seize continuous opportunities in a world where battle had turned into a traditional dance.
Mao was a genius because he played country against city, by seizing opportunity because of divisiveness between city and rural.
Lenin(stalin) was an opportunist that could play the rural against the urban, and the jewish against the russian. If the jews can destroy the russian empire….
The Irish won as the afghans did: hit and run until moral legitimacy was lost.
Hitler(Mussolini),was only possible because of timing. This isn’t possible any longer (secular theology).
The french revolution was only possible because france was the most backward government in europe.
The military rotation back tot he top is pretty simple to accomplish because they share the incentives of the common people from which they come.
The common man today is being conquered and he knows it. Mao and the irish are the examples. It costs nothing to bring an empire to its knees if in doing so the empire loses its legitimacy.
So the only problem here is material incentives that people prefer over the current state, sufficient enough to end their resistance, not necessarily obtain their consent or participation.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-14 15:29:04 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/10626294457026504
-
PROPERTARIAN POSITIONS 1. Borders. 2. School Choice. 3. Definancialization. 4. D
PROPERTARIAN POSITIONS
1. Borders.
2. School Choice.
3. Definancialization.
4. De-Propagandism
5. Voluntary Disassociation.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-26 20:26:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1121873188000948224
-
Build and Run a think tank Build and Run a tech startup. Build, run, and sell, a
Build and Run a think tank
Build and Run a tech startup.
Build, run, and sell, a 100m tech company.
Build, run and fail a dot com boom company.
Build, run, and sell, a 10m tech company
Build, run, and sell, an 80m tech company
What you write matters. Code and Theory vs Opinion.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-26 13:47:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1121772833259118597
Reply addressees: @petersuderman @MattWelch
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1121761905398427648
IN REPLY TO:
@petersuderman
Five jobs I’ve had:
1. Write stuff on the internet.
2. Read stuff on the internet.
3. Watch stuff on the internet.
4. Edit stuff on the internet.
5. Server at a Florida restaurant with an on-premise fake swamp filled with live alligators.Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1121761905398427648
-
1. paleolithic dark age. 2. bronze age collapse. 3. abrahamic dark age(judaism,
1. paleolithic dark age.
2. bronze age collapse.
3. abrahamic dark age(judaism, christianity, islam),
4. second abrahamic dark age (marxism, boaz, freud, postmodernism.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-06 23:32:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1114672345740869633
-
A Short Course in the Grammars
There are a few fundamental innovations in Propertarianism 1 – The Dimensional warranty of due diligence (Testimonialism) 2 – The Periodic Table of speech (Grammars)3 – The Operational language and grammar in ePrime 4 – The Method of producing serialized Definitions (Disambiguation) 5 – Property in toto and the completion of the anarchic program in a reduction of social science to statements of changes in the state of ‘property’ (interests).
Grammar: “Rules of continuous disambiguation, limited to some set of dimensions, where those dimensions function as measurements, where those measurements consist of constant relations, between analogies to perception, experience, intuition, reason, or action; producing a well formed statement, functioning as a series of transactions, in a contract for meaning.”
“GETTING IT”
propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-1227/
“Let me try to identify things that would have made it faster: 1) Vocabulary. That would have been the biggest barrier to entry for me. What is fictionalism? What is operationalism? Largely graspable. Once this is clear I don’t see anything blocking the understand of the grammars. 2) I should have focused less on your facebook posts (until I got the grammars). I think I should have went straight to the website and find the Core of Propertarianism.”
THE GRAMMARS (POSTER)
—“Just saw you table of grammars, there is enough material for ten years of study just there.”— Singular Speech Yes. The Grammars, Operational language, Acquisitionism, Property in toto, Dimensional Warranties of Due Diligence,. Those sets of concepts produce a formal logic of social science, expressible not with set language, but with operational language. … Like I said. There is a wonderful parsimonious elegance underneath it all. It’s beautiful. Truth is enough – and it is now possible.
UNDERSTANDING THE GRAMMARS
Our Definition of ‘Grammar’ propertarianism.com/2018/10/30/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-1971/
All grammars limit the domains (property ranges) of semantic content. Semantic limits do not exist independent of grammars, but expand (inflate) fictionally or contract (deflate) operationally, empirically, and logically (meaning scientifically). In fact, the purpose of deflationary grammars is primarily to decrease deception, fiction, disambiguation, and dimensions, and therefore increase precision.
Inflationary and Deflationary Grammars propertarianism.com/2018/06/20/understanding-deflationary-grammar-and-dimensions/ Define Deflationary Grammar propertarianism.com/2018/03/16/11386/ Formal Grammar propertarianism.com/2017/10/02/grammars/ Understanding Deflationary Grammar (and Dimensions) propertarianism.com/2017/03/17/the-function-of-propertarian-grammar/ Grammars Instead of Logics propertarianism.com/2017/11/11/operationalism-grammars-instead-of-logics-its-like-chemistry-vs-biology-part-1/ Propertarianism: Datatypes, Operations, Grammar, Syntax propertarianism.com/2017/03/23/propertarianism-datatypes-operations-grammar-syntax/ EPRIME EPrime Lesson of the Day propertarianism.com/2016/09/23/e-prime-lesson-of-the-day/ Natural Law and the Grammar of Operational Language propertarianism.com/2017/02/20/natural-law-and-the-grammar-of-operational-language/ Law is the Top (Most Complete) Grammar propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-13/ The Grammar Tells You Everything About The Argument propertarianism.com/2018/10/30/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-1975/ Will Aliens Use the Same Grammars? propertarianism.com/2018/05/28/will-aliens-use-the-same-grammar/ The Route to Operational Grammar propertarianism.com/2017/11/01/the-route-to-operational-grammar/ What Is a Testimonial Argument? propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-730/ The Series of Grammars Psychology propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-53/ Aristotle was the only Prophet that wasn’t lying propertarianism.com/2018/06/02/grammars-always-tell-the-truth/ The Grammars of Truth and Deceit propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-1409/ Abrahamism Is a Grammar of Devolutionary Deceit propertarianism.com/2018/06/19/abrahamism-is-a-grammar-of-devolutionary-deceit/ The Grammar of Pseudoscience and Intellectual Fraud propertarianism.com/2018/05/21/the-grammar-of-pseudoscience/ The Grammar And Semantics Of Social Fraud: Soft Violence propertarianism.com/2018/01/19/the-grammar-and-semantics-of-social-fraud-soft-violence/ Teach people GRAMMARS so that they can DECODE (Weigh and Measure) speech propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-206/ We don’t have to speak in Operational Language – just know how to use it. propertarianism.com/2018/01/17/we-dont-all-have-to-speak-in-operational-language-any-more-than-we-need-to-speak-in-mathematics-or-legalese-but/
-
A Short Course in the Grammars
There are a few fundamental innovations in Propertarianism 1 – The Dimensional warranty of due diligence (Testimonialism) 2 – The Periodic Table of speech (Grammars)3 – The Operational language and grammar in ePrime 4 – The Method of producing serialized Definitions (Disambiguation) 5 – Property in toto and the completion of the anarchic program in a reduction of social science to statements of changes in the state of ‘property’ (interests).
Grammar: “Rules of continuous disambiguation, limited to some set of dimensions, where those dimensions function as measurements, where those measurements consist of constant relations, between analogies to perception, experience, intuition, reason, or action; producing a well formed statement, functioning as a series of transactions, in a contract for meaning.”
“GETTING IT”
propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-1227/
“Let me try to identify things that would have made it faster: 1) Vocabulary. That would have been the biggest barrier to entry for me. What is fictionalism? What is operationalism? Largely graspable. Once this is clear I don’t see anything blocking the understand of the grammars. 2) I should have focused less on your facebook posts (until I got the grammars). I think I should have went straight to the website and find the Core of Propertarianism.”
THE GRAMMARS (POSTER)
—“Just saw you table of grammars, there is enough material for ten years of study just there.”— Singular Speech Yes. The Grammars, Operational language, Acquisitionism, Property in toto, Dimensional Warranties of Due Diligence,. Those sets of concepts produce a formal logic of social science, expressible not with set language, but with operational language. … Like I said. There is a wonderful parsimonious elegance underneath it all. It’s beautiful. Truth is enough – and it is now possible.
UNDERSTANDING THE GRAMMARS
Our Definition of ‘Grammar’ propertarianism.com/2018/10/30/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-1971/
All grammars limit the domains (property ranges) of semantic content. Semantic limits do not exist independent of grammars, but expand (inflate) fictionally or contract (deflate) operationally, empirically, and logically (meaning scientifically). In fact, the purpose of deflationary grammars is primarily to decrease deception, fiction, disambiguation, and dimensions, and therefore increase precision.
Inflationary and Deflationary Grammars propertarianism.com/2018/06/20/understanding-deflationary-grammar-and-dimensions/ Define Deflationary Grammar propertarianism.com/2018/03/16/11386/ Formal Grammar propertarianism.com/2017/10/02/grammars/ Understanding Deflationary Grammar (and Dimensions) propertarianism.com/2017/03/17/the-function-of-propertarian-grammar/ Grammars Instead of Logics propertarianism.com/2017/11/11/operationalism-grammars-instead-of-logics-its-like-chemistry-vs-biology-part-1/ Propertarianism: Datatypes, Operations, Grammar, Syntax propertarianism.com/2017/03/23/propertarianism-datatypes-operations-grammar-syntax/ EPRIME EPrime Lesson of the Day propertarianism.com/2016/09/23/e-prime-lesson-of-the-day/ Natural Law and the Grammar of Operational Language propertarianism.com/2017/02/20/natural-law-and-the-grammar-of-operational-language/ Law is the Top (Most Complete) Grammar propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-13/ The Grammar Tells You Everything About The Argument propertarianism.com/2018/10/30/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-1975/ Will Aliens Use the Same Grammars? propertarianism.com/2018/05/28/will-aliens-use-the-same-grammar/ The Route to Operational Grammar propertarianism.com/2017/11/01/the-route-to-operational-grammar/ What Is a Testimonial Argument? propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-730/ The Series of Grammars Psychology propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-53/ Aristotle was the only Prophet that wasn’t lying propertarianism.com/2018/06/02/grammars-always-tell-the-truth/ The Grammars of Truth and Deceit propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-1409/ Abrahamism Is a Grammar of Devolutionary Deceit propertarianism.com/2018/06/19/abrahamism-is-a-grammar-of-devolutionary-deceit/ The Grammar of Pseudoscience and Intellectual Fraud propertarianism.com/2018/05/21/the-grammar-of-pseudoscience/ The Grammar And Semantics Of Social Fraud: Soft Violence propertarianism.com/2018/01/19/the-grammar-and-semantics-of-social-fraud-soft-violence/ Teach people GRAMMARS so that they can DECODE (Weigh and Measure) speech propertarianism.com/2019/03/28/curt-doolittle-updated-his-status-206/ We don’t have to speak in Operational Language – just know how to use it. propertarianism.com/2018/01/17/we-dont-all-have-to-speak-in-operational-language-any-more-than-we-need-to-speak-in-mathematics-or-legalese-but/
-
Our Solution – and Our Limited Function in It.
(FB 1541945323 Timestamp) OUR SOLUTION – AND OUR LIMITED FUNCTION IN IT. 1) We are the JUDGES of the NATURAL LAW – the JUDGES of our polity. “Those Who State Limits.” 2) There are warriors, artists, scientists, engineers, craftsman, doctors, and mothers. Their jobs are ‘what shall we do and ‘how shall we do it’. Our job in the division of labor – a division of unequal knowledge and function – but equal duty and responsibility. 3) Signals alone will drive excellence out of what we shall do, if natural law is imposed upon them since the GOOD and EXCELLENT are the only means possible available to them. 4) Our men will build valhalla because we leave them no other choice. Our men will make immortality because we leave them no other choice. Our men will reach the stars because we leave them no other choice. We do not need instruct them to do so because we leave them no other choice. 5) As judges we must prosecute violators of the natural law. No matter who, where, and when they may be. 6) Our way is War: to eliminate that which is bad – leaving those with less agency to produce only that which is good. We parent mankind by this means alone. Not by telling them what to do. But by telling them what not to do, and leaving them to discover all possible means of doing what else they may do? It is for the lesser people – all who have failed – to anchor their people in an era by stating that which they must or should do other than avoid or defeat that which is false or bad. The uniqueness of western civilization is sovereignty reciprocity truth, duty, and the law – producing markets of the good by eliminating the bad, and thereby continuously calculating our transformation into gods – omniscient and omnipotent – by the fastest means possible: trial and error.