Form: Outline

  • The Enemy’s Technique

    Nov 15, 2019, 11:44 AM THE ENEMY’S TECHNIQUE (algorithmic) Civilizational Destruction from Within; Instigating Construction of Internal Spirals of Capital Rivalry, Consumption, Destruction; Baiting into Hazard (certain risk); Those who are ignorant, or lack agency; By use of False Promise (circumvention of reality); Under the persuasion by Sophism (pilpul); Justified by Critique (lie, criticism, straw-manning) Under the cover of Moral Pretense (lie); Under the cover of Plausible Deniability (lie); For the purpose of profiting (by harm) From the consumption of accumulated capital (undermining): … truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes, By not specializing in, … The production of innovation in goods services information, both private and common … Warrantied By Specialization in fields permitting Export of Risk And Absent Warranty … Gossip for Undermining (Entertainment, Media, News, Opinion) … Informational Destruction (Academy) … Government (Facilitation of Conflict) … Legislation (Undermining by, Facilitation of Conflict, Facilitating Dissolution of norms, traditions, manners, ethics morals, Parasitism, Capital exhaustion) … Rent-Seeking (special interests) … Corruption (influence) … Undermining the law (specialization in undermining the constitution via the courts) … Law (specialization in coercion) … Finance (Parasitism and entrapment) … Tax and accounting (evasion) … Marketing and Advertising (scams and undermining) … Sales Scams … Commercial Trade in Scams physical, service, and informational … Black Market Goods, services, and Information. … Check Cashing … Loan Sharking … Gambling … Pornography … Prostitution … Drug Dealing Thereby; … creating conflict, … destroying trust, … generating demand for restitution … generating demand for authority, An authority that recursively issues another iteration of … false promise, … baiting into hazard Causing a Continuous Conflict Spiral And Tragedy of the Commons (Conflict for consumption) until all accumulated assets: … genetic, … cultural, … normative, … artistic, … economic, … institutional and … political; have been consumed; by the conflict between classes and interests and by the expansion of the underclasses; whose numbers, invasion, reproduction, consumption, agitation, had been previously limited by; … productivity, property, market, law, and natural aristocracy; … And the surplus proceeds from production devoted to the production of commons; … Providing the asymmetric returns on those commons.

  • Reformation: The Study of Man Before and After Propertarianism

    Dec 8, 2019, 8:58 AM (worth repeating) Given the Spectrum of : {Neurobiology, Psychology, Sociology, Economics, Evolutionary Strategy, Politics and War}.

    1) Neurobiology: how the brain works: chiefly: it’s biological limits to perception, cognition, memory, knowledge and reason.

    2) Psychology: the study of the brain’s struggle to acquire and inventory, its limits, and its errors (cognitive biases) given the individual’s reproductive strategy.

    3) Sociology: the study of cooperative acquisition by groups: the production of cooperative and normative commons.

    4) Economics: the study of cooperative reproduction, production distribution and trade for the purposes of persistence. The productive commons.

    6) Evolutionary Strategy: The suite of informal(manners, ethics, morals, myths, education), economic (production distribution and trade), and formal (law, politics ) institutions that allow the extant peoples to compete with other extant peoples. The competitive commons.

    5) Politics: the study of organizational institutions for the purpose of producing competitive(group evolutionary strategy), reproductive, productive(economic), normative(institutions) and material commons.

    6) War: the study of the limits of productive cooperation, and the imposition of cooperation, elimination of threats, and elimination of competition. Man Acts To Acquire To Survive. Cooperation Is The Most Beneficial Means Action to Acquire. But only if cooperation is non-parasitic. And for cooperation to be non-parasitic it must be: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of externality by the same criteria. So, the study of man is the study of man’s acquisition of all that he desires. Man acts to acquire. NEUROBIOLOGY While we will undoubtedly gain further insights into man, brain and mind, it is unlikely that the Propertarian principles will be falsified – only increased in precision. 1) that man acts to acquire property en toto, 2) moral bias is determined by reproductive strategy 3) specialised moral biases that reflect our reproductive strategies and voluntary cooperation allow us to produce a market for cooperation that functions as an information system making use of the entire spectrum of perceptions in the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor and advocacy. 4) language evolved largely to justify actions in the context of cooperation rather than to identify truth propositions. Truth is difficult for us because it is critical. Justification is easy for us. PSYCHOLOGY Instead of asking what is right or wrong (deviation from an ideal) with someone’s thinking (a totalitarian doctrine) we ask what they seek to acquire, and whether they seek to acquire it by moral or immoral means. All human behavior can be expressed as interactions between desires for acquisition, the need to negotiate, and moral constraint, and the relative value, or lack of value, of cooperation. SOCIOLOGY Instead of asking what is right or wrong (deviation from an ideal), we ask what the group seeks to acquire, and whether they seek to acquire it by moral or immoral means. EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY Instead of asking what is right or wrong (deviation from an idea) we ask what the group seeks ot acquire, and whether they seek to acquire it by internally and externally moral, or immoral, means. ECONOMICS Economics can be studied as the means by which we eliminate frictions (transaction costs) and thereby increase the ease and decrease the risk of cooperation (Austrian Economics), OR economics can bes studied as the means by which we search for extensions of rule of law such that interference in the economy is non-discretionary (Chicago Economics), OR economics can be the means by which we determining the maximum disinformation that we can insert into the economy for the purpose of increasing consumption, and by consumption, employment(Keynesian economics). But we now know that Austrian is the most moral, Chicago at least interferes under rule of law, and Keynesian (saltwater) economics is the means by which we conduct the most deceit. POLITICS Instead of asking what action is best (monopoly) we ask how individuals can organize into groups to conduct exchanges with other groups, in order to acquire what they wish to by moral or immoral means. WAR Instead of the empirical falsehood that war is universally bad, war is the only solution to the failure to cooperate on marginally indifferent moral terms, and war is perhaps the most productive effort man can undertake if one group increases the suppression of parasitism of another group, and especially if it creates or improves trade routes. Violence is either the means by which we enact parasitism, or the means by which we eliminate parasitism. If we eliminate, or at least reduce parasitism substantially, then war, like all prosecution of parasitism, is by definition, moral. THE COMPLETION OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT PROJECT The study of man prior to Propertarianism and post-Propertarianism is equal to the study of man prior to the enlightenment and after the enlightenment. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute

  • Reformation: The Study of Man Before and After Propertarianism

    Dec 8, 2019, 8:58 AM (worth repeating) Given the Spectrum of : {Neurobiology, Psychology, Sociology, Economics, Evolutionary Strategy, Politics and War}.

    1) Neurobiology: how the brain works: chiefly: it’s biological limits to perception, cognition, memory, knowledge and reason.

    2) Psychology: the study of the brain’s struggle to acquire and inventory, its limits, and its errors (cognitive biases) given the individual’s reproductive strategy.

    3) Sociology: the study of cooperative acquisition by groups: the production of cooperative and normative commons.

    4) Economics: the study of cooperative reproduction, production distribution and trade for the purposes of persistence. The productive commons.

    6) Evolutionary Strategy: The suite of informal(manners, ethics, morals, myths, education), economic (production distribution and trade), and formal (law, politics ) institutions that allow the extant peoples to compete with other extant peoples. The competitive commons.

    5) Politics: the study of organizational institutions for the purpose of producing competitive(group evolutionary strategy), reproductive, productive(economic), normative(institutions) and material commons.

    6) War: the study of the limits of productive cooperation, and the imposition of cooperation, elimination of threats, and elimination of competition. Man Acts To Acquire To Survive. Cooperation Is The Most Beneficial Means Action to Acquire. But only if cooperation is non-parasitic. And for cooperation to be non-parasitic it must be: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of externality by the same criteria. So, the study of man is the study of man’s acquisition of all that he desires. Man acts to acquire. NEUROBIOLOGY While we will undoubtedly gain further insights into man, brain and mind, it is unlikely that the Propertarian principles will be falsified – only increased in precision. 1) that man acts to acquire property en toto, 2) moral bias is determined by reproductive strategy 3) specialised moral biases that reflect our reproductive strategies and voluntary cooperation allow us to produce a market for cooperation that functions as an information system making use of the entire spectrum of perceptions in the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor and advocacy. 4) language evolved largely to justify actions in the context of cooperation rather than to identify truth propositions. Truth is difficult for us because it is critical. Justification is easy for us. PSYCHOLOGY Instead of asking what is right or wrong (deviation from an ideal) with someone’s thinking (a totalitarian doctrine) we ask what they seek to acquire, and whether they seek to acquire it by moral or immoral means. All human behavior can be expressed as interactions between desires for acquisition, the need to negotiate, and moral constraint, and the relative value, or lack of value, of cooperation. SOCIOLOGY Instead of asking what is right or wrong (deviation from an ideal), we ask what the group seeks to acquire, and whether they seek to acquire it by moral or immoral means. EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY Instead of asking what is right or wrong (deviation from an idea) we ask what the group seeks ot acquire, and whether they seek to acquire it by internally and externally moral, or immoral, means. ECONOMICS Economics can be studied as the means by which we eliminate frictions (transaction costs) and thereby increase the ease and decrease the risk of cooperation (Austrian Economics), OR economics can bes studied as the means by which we search for extensions of rule of law such that interference in the economy is non-discretionary (Chicago Economics), OR economics can be the means by which we determining the maximum disinformation that we can insert into the economy for the purpose of increasing consumption, and by consumption, employment(Keynesian economics). But we now know that Austrian is the most moral, Chicago at least interferes under rule of law, and Keynesian (saltwater) economics is the means by which we conduct the most deceit. POLITICS Instead of asking what action is best (monopoly) we ask how individuals can organize into groups to conduct exchanges with other groups, in order to acquire what they wish to by moral or immoral means. WAR Instead of the empirical falsehood that war is universally bad, war is the only solution to the failure to cooperate on marginally indifferent moral terms, and war is perhaps the most productive effort man can undertake if one group increases the suppression of parasitism of another group, and especially if it creates or improves trade routes. Violence is either the means by which we enact parasitism, or the means by which we eliminate parasitism. If we eliminate, or at least reduce parasitism substantially, then war, like all prosecution of parasitism, is by definition, moral. THE COMPLETION OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT PROJECT The study of man prior to Propertarianism and post-Propertarianism is equal to the study of man prior to the enlightenment and after the enlightenment. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute

  • Western Strategy

    Jan 3, 2020, 10:11 AM (core) Sovereignty: Sovereignty in exchange for reciprocity. Via Negativa: limit display word and deed to the reciprocal Via Positiva: reciprocal insurance of other’s sovereignty Mindfulness (Harmony): Professional military aristocracy, a Militia of every able bodied man, creates full time military: All men in military earn respect and are given respect for doing their duty; all duty is necessary and valuable for the success of the group in a high risk venture; rank is by demonstrated ability and merit (although often of families), leadership (captains, generals, kings) are chosen by the men who choose who to follow. In other words, every man gets a share of honor, and buys the franchise. This is the source of western harmony, and it is the strongest source of harmony available to man. (And is different from all other peoples). Social Harmony: Corporatism, or, rather, the ability to create high trust commons, and to specialize in an activity on behalf of the village or town. Westerners didn’t need to invent the corporation – we practiced it as our default social order. Advantage: Continuous rapid maneuver, innovation, adaptation, of the entire polity; the suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses. Weakness: Rally Together Only Under Threat. Vulnerability: Extremely vulnerable to soft threats (immigration, conversion, undermining, commercial overextension consuming commons, military overextension under martial entrepreneurship. ie: too tolerant). Result: Excellent in military matters but weak in defense against religious cultural and informational harms. The south was more affected by the church. The center was more a balance of aristocracy and church. The North was more affected by aristocracy. This is why corruption increases as we move from north to south.

  • Western Strategy

    Jan 3, 2020, 10:11 AM (core) Sovereignty: Sovereignty in exchange for reciprocity. Via Negativa: limit display word and deed to the reciprocal Via Positiva: reciprocal insurance of other’s sovereignty Mindfulness (Harmony): Professional military aristocracy, a Militia of every able bodied man, creates full time military: All men in military earn respect and are given respect for doing their duty; all duty is necessary and valuable for the success of the group in a high risk venture; rank is by demonstrated ability and merit (although often of families), leadership (captains, generals, kings) are chosen by the men who choose who to follow. In other words, every man gets a share of honor, and buys the franchise. This is the source of western harmony, and it is the strongest source of harmony available to man. (And is different from all other peoples). Social Harmony: Corporatism, or, rather, the ability to create high trust commons, and to specialize in an activity on behalf of the village or town. Westerners didn’t need to invent the corporation – we practiced it as our default social order. Advantage: Continuous rapid maneuver, innovation, adaptation, of the entire polity; the suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses. Weakness: Rally Together Only Under Threat. Vulnerability: Extremely vulnerable to soft threats (immigration, conversion, undermining, commercial overextension consuming commons, military overextension under martial entrepreneurship. ie: too tolerant). Result: Excellent in military matters but weak in defense against religious cultural and informational harms. The south was more affected by the church. The center was more a balance of aristocracy and church. The North was more affected by aristocracy. This is why corruption increases as we move from north to south.

  • Hierarchies of the Laws

    Jan 5, 2020, 3:51 PM The Natural Law: (+) .Evolution: Evidence of Competition (-) .. History: Evidence of Consequences (+) … War: Evidence of Extra Political Conflict (-) …. Politics: Evidence of Political Conflict (+) ….. Law : Evidence of Conflict (-) …… Economics: Evidence of Cooperation (+) ……. Operations (Grammars) (+) …….. Sciences : Method of Due Diligence (-) ……… Math (measurement): (+) ………. Logic: (consistency): (-) ……….. Reason: Permutation (+) ………… Logical Facility (“difference engine”) (+/-) …………. Model, Events, Locations, Places, Objects, Entities (+) ………….. Sequences of Constant Relations (prediction) (+) …………… Human Sense Perceptions at Human Scale (+) ……………. Changes in State in the Universe At Human Scale (+) (+) = Via Positiva (-) = Via Negativa

  • Hierarchies of the Laws

    Jan 5, 2020, 3:51 PM The Natural Law: (+) .Evolution: Evidence of Competition (-) .. History: Evidence of Consequences (+) … War: Evidence of Extra Political Conflict (-) …. Politics: Evidence of Political Conflict (+) ….. Law : Evidence of Conflict (-) …… Economics: Evidence of Cooperation (+) ……. Operations (Grammars) (+) …….. Sciences : Method of Due Diligence (-) ……… Math (measurement): (+) ………. Logic: (consistency): (-) ……….. Reason: Permutation (+) ………… Logical Facility (“difference engine”) (+/-) …………. Model, Events, Locations, Places, Objects, Entities (+) ………….. Sequences of Constant Relations (prediction) (+) …………… Human Sense Perceptions at Human Scale (+) ……………. Changes in State in the Universe At Human Scale (+) (+) = Via Positiva (-) = Via Negativa

  • Why Are Contracts a Mess?

    Jan 5, 2020, 5:23 PM 0) Reality: all contracts are just form letters with names and dates in them. All that changes is the list of assets, and the rights and obligations of both parties – and mostly, it’s the obligations for both parties, ’cause rights only exist if the contract fails. The courts have spent decades since the rise of text databases in the 80’s making sure that there is settled law for almost everything you can bring before it – so much so that the only job left in court is who either (a) lied, or (b) failed due diligence (c ) sought an unearned premium at the other’s expense. 1) Surprisingly lawyers are taught contract law, not how to write contracts. And they will write for other lawyers most of the time, sometimes for in-house counsel, other times for skilled people, and otherwise for ordinary citizens. So absent this they learn to write contracts by the cut-and-paste method of contract development. So contracts accumulate ‘waste’ so to speak in most offices. They don’t accumulate solutions to problems. The courts (federal, state, local) do not put out standard contract formats that force what’s called “transactional” work into standard form. When in reality, the law does not grant much flexibility in these matters. Terms of art are largely bullshit claims. Judges are not stupid. Jurors are not stupid. The reality is that contracts are not complicated. My particular ‘thing’ is shareholder agreements. They don’t have to be complicated. They have to hit al the points in simple language. All contracts are like this, if (a) definitions are put on a separate page, (b) the before-and-after diagrams are displayed in visual form, ( c) a project-plan for signing the agreements in the appropriate sequence and the purpose of each one is stated in that plan (document), that states the title or interest change it enacts. (think of it as an accounting transaction with ledger entries). (d) each section includes a whereas “this is what we seek to accomplish” and therefore the terms of the contract in legal prose. (lawyers will resist this because it prevents people from pulling shit out of thin air, but that’s exactly why to do it. And this is the most simple – just capture the bullet list of concerns from everyone involved and make sure you’ve resolved them satisfactorily for all parties. And this is the most uncomfortable: Those engaging the contract do not inform the lawyers of the full suite of advantages that may arise from the deal, and the lawyers do not list all the reasons that they think the contract (arrangement) will fail. Truth: I generally have to tell lawyers to let me manage risk (that’s my job as a business person) and you create the level of contract suitable to my target risk. This is how you ‘Price’ a contract so to speak. By risk reward and resource expenditure your time. 2) Current legal training is antithetical to business, because it begins as teaching the adversarial method – it does not teach means of reaching compromise, settlement, or methods of cooperation that must adapt to changing circumstances. This leads people in defense to ‘double down’ on conflict rather than double down on compromise. This is not how business people resolve conflicts. So really there are two stages. the ones exterior to the contract, and the terms that will fight before the court if the contract fails. My understanding is that this is a problem of failing to require via positiva statements of intent for every via-negativa bit of blame. In other words contracts do not spend time on the via positiva means of settling error, failure of due diligence, change in circumstance. 3) The legal teams try to add unnecessary value to justify jobs (this is endemic). I see this all over the place. The problem is malincentives in legal fees: especially hourly. The problem is revenue constraints. In other words we have too many lawyers, working too hard, to drive up fees, and a court that doesn’t stop it, and a population that has no choice. 4) Courts work too often by win/lose instead of proportional settlements. This is partly by design to force settlement prior to court, and then turning the courtroom into a lottery of uncertainty, where the outcome is worse than settlement – it is not what the framers or common law judges in history intended. 5) Irreciprocal competency and scale of legal teams means they compete for providing opportunities for advantage rather than due diligence in preventing advantage. 6) systemic abandonment of moral norms has led to the need to articulate what was normative in law. 7) the law is lagging behind the rate of evolution of the complexity of contracts. 8) The law does not prevent entrapments as it used to, because it defers to the wisdom of business people (good) but not to baiting into hazard. 9) Law does not punish (as it used to) abuses of the court, the law, the contract so it is worthwhile for full time legal teams or lawyers to bill by the hour to use the economics to drive a settlement or court decision. That’s just the surface.

  • Why Are Contracts a Mess?

    Jan 5, 2020, 5:23 PM 0) Reality: all contracts are just form letters with names and dates in them. All that changes is the list of assets, and the rights and obligations of both parties – and mostly, it’s the obligations for both parties, ’cause rights only exist if the contract fails. The courts have spent decades since the rise of text databases in the 80’s making sure that there is settled law for almost everything you can bring before it – so much so that the only job left in court is who either (a) lied, or (b) failed due diligence (c ) sought an unearned premium at the other’s expense. 1) Surprisingly lawyers are taught contract law, not how to write contracts. And they will write for other lawyers most of the time, sometimes for in-house counsel, other times for skilled people, and otherwise for ordinary citizens. So absent this they learn to write contracts by the cut-and-paste method of contract development. So contracts accumulate ‘waste’ so to speak in most offices. They don’t accumulate solutions to problems. The courts (federal, state, local) do not put out standard contract formats that force what’s called “transactional” work into standard form. When in reality, the law does not grant much flexibility in these matters. Terms of art are largely bullshit claims. Judges are not stupid. Jurors are not stupid. The reality is that contracts are not complicated. My particular ‘thing’ is shareholder agreements. They don’t have to be complicated. They have to hit al the points in simple language. All contracts are like this, if (a) definitions are put on a separate page, (b) the before-and-after diagrams are displayed in visual form, ( c) a project-plan for signing the agreements in the appropriate sequence and the purpose of each one is stated in that plan (document), that states the title or interest change it enacts. (think of it as an accounting transaction with ledger entries). (d) each section includes a whereas “this is what we seek to accomplish” and therefore the terms of the contract in legal prose. (lawyers will resist this because it prevents people from pulling shit out of thin air, but that’s exactly why to do it. And this is the most simple – just capture the bullet list of concerns from everyone involved and make sure you’ve resolved them satisfactorily for all parties. And this is the most uncomfortable: Those engaging the contract do not inform the lawyers of the full suite of advantages that may arise from the deal, and the lawyers do not list all the reasons that they think the contract (arrangement) will fail. Truth: I generally have to tell lawyers to let me manage risk (that’s my job as a business person) and you create the level of contract suitable to my target risk. This is how you ‘Price’ a contract so to speak. By risk reward and resource expenditure your time. 2) Current legal training is antithetical to business, because it begins as teaching the adversarial method – it does not teach means of reaching compromise, settlement, or methods of cooperation that must adapt to changing circumstances. This leads people in defense to ‘double down’ on conflict rather than double down on compromise. This is not how business people resolve conflicts. So really there are two stages. the ones exterior to the contract, and the terms that will fight before the court if the contract fails. My understanding is that this is a problem of failing to require via positiva statements of intent for every via-negativa bit of blame. In other words contracts do not spend time on the via positiva means of settling error, failure of due diligence, change in circumstance. 3) The legal teams try to add unnecessary value to justify jobs (this is endemic). I see this all over the place. The problem is malincentives in legal fees: especially hourly. The problem is revenue constraints. In other words we have too many lawyers, working too hard, to drive up fees, and a court that doesn’t stop it, and a population that has no choice. 4) Courts work too often by win/lose instead of proportional settlements. This is partly by design to force settlement prior to court, and then turning the courtroom into a lottery of uncertainty, where the outcome is worse than settlement – it is not what the framers or common law judges in history intended. 5) Irreciprocal competency and scale of legal teams means they compete for providing opportunities for advantage rather than due diligence in preventing advantage. 6) systemic abandonment of moral norms has led to the need to articulate what was normative in law. 7) the law is lagging behind the rate of evolution of the complexity of contracts. 8) The law does not prevent entrapments as it used to, because it defers to the wisdom of business people (good) but not to baiting into hazard. 9) Law does not punish (as it used to) abuses of the court, the law, the contract so it is worthwhile for full time legal teams or lawyers to bill by the hour to use the economics to drive a settlement or court decision. That’s just the surface.

  • The History Of The Germanic War for Integration and Restoration

    Jan 5, 2020, 9:43 PM (working on this ) The Germanic War for Integration into Roman Civilization The Germanic wars for Restoration of Roman Civilization 1562 – 1598 The French War to preserve church and state corruption, and general ignorance, against the Protestant Huguenots and their restoration of ancient knowledge by slaughtering them. Catholic mobs killed between 5,000 and 30,000 Protestants over a period of weeks throughout the entire kingdom. But the war endured for decades, as the monarchy an church conspired to keep the people ignorant, and submissive. 1618 – 1648 The Thirty Years War: Theoretically over the conflict between catholic and protestant holy roman empire (Germania), was, an remains a conflict over control of europe between France–and the Habsburgs (Germans – the finest ruling class in history). As always, France was in the wrong. The war cost 8M, or 25% of europe’s population. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty_Years%27_War *1750 – Rousseau (“the pervert”) and the French revolt against British empiricism, law, and science. 1756 – 1763 The (Real) First World War: The Seven Years War : 1M dead. Starts with the French and Indian War and Escalates into a world war. Resulting in UK Demand for Taxes to pay for it, and the USA declaring independence to escape paying for it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Years%27_War 1792-1802 The French Revolution against The Modern World 1800-1815 Napoleonic War: The Third French Attempt to dominate europe. 1812: British and Indian War to maintain American control of the continent. 1846-1848 Mexican American War to maintain American control of the continent Jewish Revolt against the Modern World – Marx’ Revolt against the Modern World. He had three main goals: organizing European workers for “class struggle”; opposing the authoritarian regime of William II; and advocating Communist revolution in Russia. 1864 – Civil War: The War to Maintain Northern Control of the Continent 1914-1918 WW1 – The War of Franco-Russian-Anglo Aggression against the germans who had united defensively because of napoleon’s and Russia’s aggressions. 1917 – The Jewish Bolshevik Conquest of Russia and The Jewish Holocaust against the Russian and Ukrainian people. *1934 – The Jewish Invasion of America and the Combination of Marx and Freud to Undermine western civilization. 1939 – The german positive action to prevent the french, jewish, and russian undermining and conquest of western civilization. 1964 – The Jewish success at undermining america through (a) immigration, (b) feminism, ( c) postmodernism (Lying) (d) baiting into hazard. (e) propaganda. (f) media.