Curt Doolittle

Form: Outline

  • Quick Translation Beween Philosophy and Propertarianism (natural Law)

    Feb 20, 2020, 8:51 AM Metaphysics: Realism, naturalism, operationalism, empiricism, survival, compatibilism, cooperation, propertarianism, acquisitionism, action. Operationalism: testimony in operational terms (one continuous consistent commensurable system of falsifiable measurement) Science: testimony in empirical terms (observation of demonstrated evidence) expressed in a commensurable terms (operational). Ontology: realism/naturalism, soft determinism, three faculties: physical, intuitionistic, and mind as motion(no name for it in philosophical terms: experience consists of continuous recursive hierarchical temporal memory – memory of memory continuously constructed by continuous prediction from sequences of sense perception.) the problem is getting people from the observer to perception consisting of change (action) not state. Epistemology: Competition between justification(hypothesis), operation(theory) and empiricism(evidence) at increasing scales (self-reason via positiva-justification, via-negativa and via-positiva-tests, via-negativa market survival) Truthfulness: Due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, deceit, in performative, promissory testimony in complete sentences that are consistent, correspondent, operational, limited, complete, and coherent. Axiology: value: acquisitionism: acquisition of property in toto defined by demonstrated interest (IOW self reported values never reflect demonstrated preference, and demonstrated preference can always be expressed as acquisition of property in toto -a gain yielding a fully commensurable system of measurement), Ethics: Reciprocity – via negativa, all ethnical and moral questions are decidable by tests of fully accounted reciprocity. In other words: I’m describing economics. Which, as others have stated before me, appears to function as the union of the disciplines. Philosophy: Do we think philosophy produces Truth, Meaning, or Choice? As far as I can tell Law, Economics, Science, Mathematics, and the human logical facility (differences in constant relations) produce testimony. As far as I can tell The Grammars (which you don’t know yet) produce the most parsimonious paradigm. Philosophy considers ideals, rarely if ever costs, means of production(models), possibilities(consequences and externalities). So what is the remaining function of philosophy? Reorganization of preferences and means of achieving them given the truth we have identified with “science in toto”: (law, economics, science, math, logical facility). In other words, discovery of truth (science) selection of preference (philosophy), sedation or abandonment (theology). Which makes sense to me since Math(measurement), Science(matter) and Economics (people) produce evidence, law produces testimony and decidability independent of preference, and philosophy produces preference, and as far as I can tell theology allows people to escape the work of philosophy, law, and science – leading to graceful failure as our knowledge and ability decreases from science to norm or law, to philosophy, to theology.

  • The Group Strategies: Confucianism, Aristotelianism, Abrahamism, Hinduism>buddhism

    Mar 2, 2020, 3:45 PM THE GROUP STRATEGIES: CONFUCIANISM, ARISTOTELIANISM, ABRAHAMISM, HINDUISM>BUDDHISM Burial … Animism …. … Sun Tzu Realism ( martial realism) … … Confucianism (harmony) … … … Daoism (Tolerance) … Proto IE Religion … … Proto Vedic … … … Hinduism … … … Zoroastrianism … … European Sky Father (martial realism) … … … European Common Law (legal realism) … … … … Platonism (idealism) … … … … … Aristotelianism (realism naturalism) … Proto Semitic … … Proto Judaism … … … … Abrahamism <- Zoroastrianism (Authoritarianism) … … … … … Rabbinical Judaism (Justificationism) … … … … … Christianity (resistance) … … … … … … The Augustinian Conflation (compromise) … … … … … … … Orthodoxy – Catholicism, (settlement) … … … … … … … … Protestantism, (reformation) … … … … … … … … … Evangelicalism (folk-religion restoration) … … … … … … Islam (7th c+) … … … … … … … Fundamentalist Islam (11-12th c+)

  • The Group Strategies: Confucianism, Aristotelianism, Abrahamism, Hinduism>buddhism

    Mar 2, 2020, 3:45 PM THE GROUP STRATEGIES: CONFUCIANISM, ARISTOTELIANISM, ABRAHAMISM, HINDUISM>BUDDHISM Burial … Animism …. … Sun Tzu Realism ( martial realism) … … Confucianism (harmony) … … … Daoism (Tolerance) … Proto IE Religion … … Proto Vedic … … … Hinduism … … … Zoroastrianism … … European Sky Father (martial realism) … … … European Common Law (legal realism) … … … … Platonism (idealism) … … … … … Aristotelianism (realism naturalism) … Proto Semitic … … Proto Judaism … … … … Abrahamism <- Zoroastrianism (Authoritarianism) … … … … … Rabbinical Judaism (Justificationism) … … … … … Christianity (resistance) … … … … … … The Augustinian Conflation (compromise) … … … … … … … Orthodoxy – Catholicism, (settlement) … … … … … … … … Protestantism, (reformation) … … … … … … … … … Evangelicalism (folk-religion restoration) … … … … … … Islam (7th c+) … … … … … … … Fundamentalist Islam (11-12th c+)

  • What World-Intellectual Elites Exist?

    Mar 2, 2020, 3:55 PM

    1. European Aristotelian Masculine 2. Ashkenazi Jewish Abrahamic Feminine 3. The Chinese Act rather than Talk, they don’t create universals, the run their civilization out of self interest. Confucianism isn’t argumentative or combative like scientific truth or abrahamic undermining. 4. If India has intellectual elites they’re invisible to us primarily because they are concentrating as are the Chinese on their own. 5. There are no islamic intellectual elites because it’s an anti intellectual civilization in the sense we meant it as innovative. (open to criticism on this)

  • What World-Intellectual Elites Exist?

    Mar 2, 2020, 3:55 PM

    1. European Aristotelian Masculine 2. Ashkenazi Jewish Abrahamic Feminine 3. The Chinese Act rather than Talk, they don’t create universals, the run their civilization out of self interest. Confucianism isn’t argumentative or combative like scientific truth or abrahamic undermining. 4. If India has intellectual elites they’re invisible to us primarily because they are concentrating as are the Chinese on their own. 5. There are no islamic intellectual elites because it’s an anti intellectual civilization in the sense we meant it as innovative. (open to criticism on this)

  • Morality by Continuous Recursive Disambiguation and Expansion

    Mar 4, 2020, 2:49 PM MORALITY BY CONTINUOUS RECURSIVE DISAMBIGUATION AND EXPANSION (example) (core)

    a) Morality = Theology and Philosophy b) Ethics = Philosophy and Law c) Reciprocity= Law and ScienceEXPANSION:

    1. Reciprocity.

    2. Reciprocity within the limits of proportionality (defection).

    3. Reciprocity against property-in-toto within the limits of proportionality.

    4. Reciprocity in display word and deed, against property-in-toto, within the limits of proportionality.

    5. Reciprocity in display word and deed by productive, fully informed(truthful), voluntary transfer(exchange), of demonstrated interests as described by property in toto, free of imposition of against the demonstrated interests of others, within the limits of restitution, within limits of possible due diligence, and warrantied within the limits of liability.

    6. Reciprocity in display word and deed by due diligence against error bias and deceit, by tests of realism, naturalism and categorical, internal, operational, external consistency, rational choice, including full accounting, within stated limits; and of productive, voluntary transfer(exchange), of demonstrated interests, as described by property in toto, free of imposition of against the demonstrated interests of others, within the limits of restitution, within limits of possible due diligence, and warrantied within the limits of liability.

    7. Reciprocity of display word and deed by due diligence against error bias and deceit, by tests of realism, naturalism and categorical, internal, operational, external consistency, rational choice, including full accounting, within stated limits; and of productive, voluntary transfer(exchange), of demonstrated interests as whether personal, several, or common; free of imposition of against the demonstrated interests of others, within the limits of restitution, within limits of possible due diligence, and warrantied within the limits of liability.

    8. Reciprocity consisting in bi-directional voluntary transfer, by display, word, and deed, of due diligence against error bias and deceit, using tests of realism, naturalism and categorical, internal, operational, external consistency, rational choice, including full accounting, within stated limits; of productive, voluntary, demonstrated interests – whether personal, several, or common; free of imposition of against the demonstrated interests of others, within the limits of restitution, within limits of possible due diligence, and warrantied within the limits of liability.

  • Morality by Continuous Recursive Disambiguation and Expansion

    Mar 4, 2020, 2:49 PM MORALITY BY CONTINUOUS RECURSIVE DISAMBIGUATION AND EXPANSION (example) (core)

    a) Morality = Theology and Philosophy b) Ethics = Philosophy and Law c) Reciprocity= Law and ScienceEXPANSION:

    1. Reciprocity.

    2. Reciprocity within the limits of proportionality (defection).

    3. Reciprocity against property-in-toto within the limits of proportionality.

    4. Reciprocity in display word and deed, against property-in-toto, within the limits of proportionality.

    5. Reciprocity in display word and deed by productive, fully informed(truthful), voluntary transfer(exchange), of demonstrated interests as described by property in toto, free of imposition of against the demonstrated interests of others, within the limits of restitution, within limits of possible due diligence, and warrantied within the limits of liability.

    6. Reciprocity in display word and deed by due diligence against error bias and deceit, by tests of realism, naturalism and categorical, internal, operational, external consistency, rational choice, including full accounting, within stated limits; and of productive, voluntary transfer(exchange), of demonstrated interests, as described by property in toto, free of imposition of against the demonstrated interests of others, within the limits of restitution, within limits of possible due diligence, and warrantied within the limits of liability.

    7. Reciprocity of display word and deed by due diligence against error bias and deceit, by tests of realism, naturalism and categorical, internal, operational, external consistency, rational choice, including full accounting, within stated limits; and of productive, voluntary transfer(exchange), of demonstrated interests as whether personal, several, or common; free of imposition of against the demonstrated interests of others, within the limits of restitution, within limits of possible due diligence, and warrantied within the limits of liability.

    8. Reciprocity consisting in bi-directional voluntary transfer, by display, word, and deed, of due diligence against error bias and deceit, using tests of realism, naturalism and categorical, internal, operational, external consistency, rational choice, including full accounting, within stated limits; of productive, voluntary, demonstrated interests – whether personal, several, or common; free of imposition of against the demonstrated interests of others, within the limits of restitution, within limits of possible due diligence, and warrantied within the limits of liability.

  • Me? I’m a Jeffersonian Christian

    1 – My Christianity: … a) I’m a deist – gods exist as information. … b) I”m a jeffersonian christian – jesus was a philosopher … c) I’m a scientist that finds: … … Christianity was an innovation that made virtue possible for the underclasses (those without ability or means), … … AND that it was the optimum via positiva extension to natural law of western women and underclass men. … … AND Christianity is the optimum religion for a majority middle class polity because it trains people to treat one another as ‘customers’. … … AND christianity brings prosperity where it goes as long as the law also goes there. 2) I’m a Stoic – mindfulness does not need falsehoods and false promises but training, and anyone can be trained. The difference is that religion is cheap (ritual indoctrination) and stoicism is expensive (repetitive education). 3) I’m an Epicurean – happiness is the result of living within your means, regardless of your means, great or small. 4) “Spiritually” if that word has any meaning I’m a European Pagan (all generations of our gods), and Natural Heathen (Our people, my ancestors, and nature). My god is european not semitic, but military and heroic. He is Sky Father, Tyr, Zeus. 5) I’m an advocate of state religions (local organization by non profit, non-power church instead of profit and power state ) 6) I’m a tri-functionalist – I understand that the competition between masculine and feminine biases of military and religion, moderated by the law maximizes the use and utility of both while limiting the extremes, or producing a mediocrity (as did the founders). So I have a more mature understanding of religion, of christianity, and how to modernize it so that it survives.

  • Me? I’m a Jeffersonian Christian

    1 – My Christianity: … a) I’m a deist – gods exist as information. … b) I”m a jeffersonian christian – jesus was a philosopher … c) I’m a scientist that finds: … … Christianity was an innovation that made virtue possible for the underclasses (those without ability or means), … … AND that it was the optimum via positiva extension to natural law of western women and underclass men. … … AND Christianity is the optimum religion for a majority middle class polity because it trains people to treat one another as ‘customers’. … … AND christianity brings prosperity where it goes as long as the law also goes there. 2) I’m a Stoic – mindfulness does not need falsehoods and false promises but training, and anyone can be trained. The difference is that religion is cheap (ritual indoctrination) and stoicism is expensive (repetitive education). 3) I’m an Epicurean – happiness is the result of living within your means, regardless of your means, great or small. 4) “Spiritually” if that word has any meaning I’m a European Pagan (all generations of our gods), and Natural Heathen (Our people, my ancestors, and nature). My god is european not semitic, but military and heroic. He is Sky Father, Tyr, Zeus. 5) I’m an advocate of state religions (local organization by non profit, non-power church instead of profit and power state ) 6) I’m a tri-functionalist – I understand that the competition between masculine and feminine biases of military and religion, moderated by the law maximizes the use and utility of both while limiting the extremes, or producing a mediocrity (as did the founders). So I have a more mature understanding of religion, of christianity, and how to modernize it so that it survives.

  • Bottlenecks, Collapses, Dark Ages

    Mar 6, 2020, 12:30 PM The Early Bottleneck ~BC2-3M The Toba Bottleneck ~Bc75k The Out Of Africa Bottlneck ~Bc50k The Bering Straight Bottleneck ??? The Paleolithic Collapse Bc25k ??? The Persian Gulf Deluge BC12000-10000 The Neolithic Farmers and Religion Bc7000+ The Black Sea Deluge – Bc5600 The First Early Bronze Age Dark Age – Bc2200 -1900 The Indo European (Bronze) Expansion And The Great Divide Bc2500-1500+ The Bronze Age Collapse – The Dark Age – Bc1177-800 The Bronze Age Revival – The Axial Age – Our Religious Traditions Bc800+ The Semitic Dark Ages – Abrahamism V1 Ad100/400–1200/1600 The Steel Age Revival – Aristotelianism Ad1200/1600 – 1920 The Information Age Collapse – Abrahamism V2 – 1850/Present-???