0. Logic: Consistency (Relations) >
1. Science: Truth (Testimony) >
2. Natural Law: Ethics (Reciprocity) >
3. Philosophy: Choice (Opportunity) >
4. Mythology: Education (Strategy)
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-18 17:37:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1339988062286323714
All human behavior demonstrates:
… a) sex differences in cognitive bias (short/ empathic/ interpersonal vs long/ systematic/ political),
… b) in dominance(confidence)/submission(fear),
… c) confict (confruntation/undermining)
… d) in trait expression,
… e) in intelligence,
… f) in market value,
… g) in experience,
… h) and in training.
All you have to ask is which of those traits are we observing in pursuit of what acquisition, retention, or loss prevention, and whether the behavior in display word or deed is in pursuit of investment, trade,debt collection, or theft. Deconstruct behavior by and econ and law.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-17 16:17:16 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105396426243779300
We retain emotions because 1) they were necessary evolutionary incentives under awareness but before pre-consciousness, 2) they are an early developmental utility 3) they allow mothers to empathize with pre-verbal, 4) they provide for graceful failure of consciousness and reason.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-14 17:01:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1338529438405963780
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11 @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1338374210842996736
1. Germanic peoples of the 1st century, Minor legal disputes were settled on a day-to-day basis by elected chiefs assisted by elected officials, and criminal cases put before the thing. The Thing, used the law and heard witnesses to rule whether the accused was guilty or not. 2. Any injury must be compensated according to the damage done, regardless of motive or intent. (ie: Law = Tort = Natural Law) Lighter offenses required damages, paid in part to the victim and in part to the king. 3. The most extreme punishment for crimes considered irredeemable was outlawry: the declaration of the guilty party as beyond the protection of the law. (Worse than ostracization, it mean loss of reciprocal defense under the common law: open season on you, family, property.) 4. It was a death penalty in practice, but not one by direct action. The death penalty by direct action was reserved for two kinds of capital offenses: military treason or desertion was punished by hanging, and rape by strangling and burial in a bog. Bog Bodies=Rapists/Adulterers 5. The difference in capital punishment is explained by the idea that “glaring iniquities” must be exposed in plain sight, while “cowardice, effeminacy, and pollution” should best be buried and concealed. (Note the disgust response.) 6. My point? All militia orders whether raiding steppe herders, conquering IE Europeans (Aryans) mixing farming and herding, greeks, Romans, or continental germanics and vikings, pirates, and the British and American conquerors, practiced the same law of TORT b/c it’s NECESSARY – it’s the only means of organizing a market of warriors. 7. And the only means of organizing a polity of warriors: a militia.
1. Germanic peoples of the 1st century, Minor legal disputes were settled on a day-to-day basis by elected chiefs assisted by elected officials, and criminal cases put before the thing. The Thing, used the law and heard witnesses to rule whether the accused was guilty or not. 2. Any injury must be compensated according to the damage done, regardless of motive or intent. (ie: Law = Tort = Natural Law) Lighter offenses required damages, paid in part to the victim and in part to the king. 3. The most extreme punishment for crimes considered irredeemable was outlawry: the declaration of the guilty party as beyond the protection of the law. (Worse than ostracization, it mean loss of reciprocal defense under the common law: open season on you, family, property.) 4. It was a death penalty in practice, but not one by direct action. The death penalty by direct action was reserved for two kinds of capital offenses: military treason or desertion was punished by hanging, and rape by strangling and burial in a bog. Bog Bodies=Rapists/Adulterers 5. The difference in capital punishment is explained by the idea that “glaring iniquities” must be exposed in plain sight, while “cowardice, effeminacy, and pollution” should best be buried and concealed. (Note the disgust response.) 6. My point? All militia orders whether raiding steppe herders, conquering IE Europeans (Aryans) mixing farming and herding, greeks, Romans, or continental germanics and vikings, pirates, and the British and American conquerors, practiced the same law of TORT b/c it’s NECESSARY – it’s the only means of organizing a market of warriors. 7. And the only means of organizing a polity of warriors: a militia.
DECENTRALIZATION
Polities Sort by Demand for Different Commons.
Dysgenic Equalitarian Left vs Eugenic Meritocratic Right
We are incompatible.
1. Revolutionary War to Separate
2. Civil War 1 to Centralize
3. Civil War 2 to Decentralize (Separate)
Learn: https://propertarianinstitute.com/the-book/revolution/introduction-to-the-declaration-of-reformation/
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-11 19:21:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1337477680648892416
Reply addressees: @ScottAdamsSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1337463851420274688
THE REASON REVOLUTION COMES (a) We have no civil order. (b) No defense of life, property, or commons (c) no rule of law (d) no equal protection under the law (e) we have a non-neutral policing, (f) no juridical defense (g) and our govt is not organized for total war in an era of total war. (h) Our taxation, economy, and academy favor 35% at the expense of all the rest (i) Our financial system isn’t sovereign, delivers us to predatory parasitic globalists, impoverishes our middle, working, and laboring classes, and deprives us of +1T per year in commons. (j) We are forcibly involuntarily associated in polities, politics, business, community, education, and neighborhood, against our will, against our interests, preventing us from customizing commons, to the division and detriment of all, in the greatest failed policy in history. What’s the difference between right and left? Right, Generative Adversarial, Capitalizing(meritocratic) Eugenic Adaptation of Quality, versus Left, Consensus Harmonious, Parasitic(equalitarian) Dysgenic Devolution of Quantity. We are incompatible because our first causes (moral intuitions and reproductive strategies) are polar opposites. They are the extremes of the male hierarchical and female equalitarian reproductive strategies. The Left’s entire doctrine is science denial: a revolt against the Darwinian explanation for the success of western civ: a revolt against truth, formal, physical, and evolutionary laws. The Religious Rights only pseudoscience is only of natural law’s origin not its content.We are incompatible because the technological innovations of european modernity created the wealth and therefore the opportunity for individual pursuit of INSTINCTS – which was the opposite of convergence the (feminine) left predicted. The right continues convergence to evolutionary adaptability, and the left rebels by attempting to converge on evolutionary non-adaptability (regression). The right to harmony in adaptive duty by the production of agency, and the left to harmony in avoidance of adaptive duty by avoidance of the production of agency. The result is the parasitic elite, a parasitic underclass who escape or cannot compete in evolutinary markets, against the productive, laboring, working, and middle classes who successfully compete in markets.We’re incompatible because Right Merit Eugenic vs Left Equal Dysgenic are incompatible, and irreconcilable.We’re incompatible and we must Separate or War.We Have a Thorough Constitutional Reform Ready It will appease the vast majority of center-left, center, and center-right, at the cost of the globalists, the financial sector, and the deep state. It is as great an innovation in natural law and rights and obligations under natural law over our existing constitution as our existing constitution was over the unwritten english constitution, and it reverses the errors of the French Revolution. It has taken 20 years of tireless effort. And it will be done early in the new year. Bring about a political revolution instead of a bloody one. Join Us: https://propertarianinstitute.com/the-book/revolution/introduction-to-the-declaration-of-reformation/
THE REASON REVOLUTION COMES (a) We have no civil order. (b) No defense of life, property, or commons (c) no rule of law (d) no equal protection under the law (e) we have a non-neutral policing, (f) no juridical defense (g) and our govt is not organized for total war in an era of total war. (h) Our taxation, economy, and academy favor 35% at the expense of all the rest (i) Our financial system isn’t sovereign, delivers us to predatory parasitic globalists, impoverishes our middle, working, and laboring classes, and deprives us of +1T per year in commons. (j) We are forcibly involuntarily associated in polities, politics, business, community, education, and neighborhood, against our will, against our interests, preventing us from customizing commons, to the division and detriment of all, in the greatest failed policy in history. What’s the difference between right and left? Right, Generative Adversarial, Capitalizing(meritocratic) Eugenic Adaptation of Quality, versus Left, Consensus Harmonious, Parasitic(equalitarian) Dysgenic Devolution of Quantity. We are incompatible because our first causes (moral intuitions and reproductive strategies) are polar opposites. They are the extremes of the male hierarchical and female equalitarian reproductive strategies. The Left’s entire doctrine is science denial: a revolt against the Darwinian explanation for the success of western civ: a revolt against truth, formal, physical, and evolutionary laws. The Religious Rights only pseudoscience is only of natural law’s origin not its content.We are incompatible because the technological innovations of european modernity created the wealth and therefore the opportunity for individual pursuit of INSTINCTS – which was the opposite of convergence the (feminine) left predicted. The right continues convergence to evolutionary adaptability, and the left rebels by attempting to converge on evolutionary non-adaptability (regression). The right to harmony in adaptive duty by the production of agency, and the left to harmony in avoidance of adaptive duty by avoidance of the production of agency. The result is the parasitic elite, a parasitic underclass who escape or cannot compete in evolutinary markets, against the productive, laboring, working, and middle classes who successfully compete in markets.We’re incompatible because Right Merit Eugenic vs Left Equal Dysgenic are incompatible, and irreconcilable.We’re incompatible and we must Separate or War.We Have a Thorough Constitutional Reform Ready It will appease the vast majority of center-left, center, and center-right, at the cost of the globalists, the financial sector, and the deep state. It is as great an innovation in natural law and rights and obligations under natural law over our existing constitution as our existing constitution was over the unwritten english constitution, and it reverses the errors of the French Revolution. It has taken 20 years of tireless effort. And it will be done early in the new year. Bring about a political revolution instead of a bloody one. Join Us: https://propertarianinstitute.com/the-book/revolution/introduction-to-the-declaration-of-reformation/
Preventing Civil War: The Demands Such that we may have this debate and seek to come to a compromise rather than the bloodiest, longest, most brutal civil war in human history, where tens of millions will certainly die: … a) All Political Speech and Political Affiliation is Protected Speech, and Political Affiliation Protected class. … b) The criminalization of all attempts at suppression of testimonial, truthful, reciprocal, empirical speech, and licensing of extrajudicial punishment to cease them. … c) Enforcement of the Law of Non-Aggression – extending self-defense, standing one’s ground, castle doctrine, and civil defense of the commons – licensing shoot-to-kill on the first demonstration of aggression whether by obstruction, challenge, threat, or force. No more lies. We will choose our destiny by Honest discourse or honest violence, but not by the restraint of violence by tolerance for violence and lies.We are incompatible because the Right’s Eugenics and Left’s Dysgenics are politically incompatible and irreconcilable. So we may grant one another the right of self-determination by political separation, and political enforcement of our differences in right eugenic and evolutionary and left dysgenic strategies. But neither has the right to deprive the other of self-determination.
Preventing Civil War: The Demands Such that we may have this debate and seek to come to a compromise rather than the bloodiest, longest, most brutal civil war in human history, where tens of millions will certainly die: … a) All Political Speech and Political Affiliation is Protected Speech, and Political Affiliation Protected class. … b) The criminalization of all attempts at suppression of testimonial, truthful, reciprocal, empirical speech, and licensing of extrajudicial punishment to cease them. … c) Enforcement of the Law of Non-Aggression – extending self-defense, standing one’s ground, castle doctrine, and civil defense of the commons – licensing shoot-to-kill on the first demonstration of aggression whether by obstruction, challenge, threat, or force. No more lies. We will choose our destiny by Honest discourse or honest violence, but not by the restraint of violence by tolerance for violence and lies.We are incompatible because the Right’s Eugenics and Left’s Dysgenics are politically incompatible and irreconcilable. So we may grant one another the right of self-determination by political separation, and political enforcement of our differences in right eugenic and evolutionary and left dysgenic strategies. But neither has the right to deprive the other of self-determination.