Form: Outline

  • The Restoration of Marriage as A Business Venture

    THE RESTORATION OF MARRIAGE AS A BUSINESS VENTURE (The end of the luxury good of romantic marriage.)

    1. The historical reason for pairing off. (Hunter-Gatherer)

    2. The historical reason for Marriage (agrarianism and property)

    3. The Invention of Romanic Love (The Plague). Romantic Love as we understand it was INVENTED and not that long ago. Marriage is a business proposition. If it isn’t it’s pointless to produce a corporation (which is what marriage consists of) instead of simply engaging in a market exchange until the opportunity’s exhausted.

    4. The invention of Chivalry ( trade restoration, viking age, pre-state formation, )

    5. The Invention of Female-On-A-Pedestal (Industrial Revolution)

    6. Evolution of marriage relations and the value of the sexes and an Illustration of why the separation of church, law, and state are so important

    7.  The pre and postware capture of the church by the Jewish invasion of the academy, converting it from Christian cooperation to Jewish conflict and undermining

    8. So we are stuck with the future where debt, economy, geostrategy, political systems, … and without a reformation that cannot be produced by an authority like the church, but must include the science, law, economics, AND moral narrative that makes us survive. Marriage is the first corporation, developed under agrarianism, which began the possibility of the accumulation of capital or what we call complex ‘property’, and the resulting far more complex common property that was then possible – the institutions of cultural production of cooperation destpie sex, class, age, family, clan, tribe and national differences. And that’s what relationships consist of: opportunities for reciprocal exchange, by the only condition in life where you can exchange putting another’s interests ahead of yours, because they are polar opposites. Exhaust opportunity, resource, or charge. It’s just physics. Sorry. This is a little closer to the voice I’m developing now that we’ve ended the century of romantic love. I think that’s the direction I want to work on, because that’s where I sense we are headed. The romantic dream American dream enlightenment dream all end together. Yep.   We have a lot of relationship mythology to unlearn – and most of it was developed during the victorian era, but not practiced until later, just like the chivalric nonsense wasn’t practiced until far later. These are class mythos sold to uplifted lower classes.

  • The Restoration of Marriage as A Business Venture

    THE RESTORATION OF MARRIAGE AS A BUSINESS VENTURE (The end of the luxury good of romantic marriage.)

    1. The historical reason for pairing off. (Hunter-Gatherer)

    2. The historical reason for Marriage (agrarianism and property)

    3. The Invention of Romanic Love (The Plague). Romantic Love as we understand it was INVENTED and not that long ago. Marriage is a business proposition. If it isn’t it’s pointless to produce a corporation (which is what marriage consists of) instead of simply engaging in a market exchange until the opportunity’s exhausted.

    4. The invention of Chivalry ( trade restoration, viking age, pre-state formation, )

    5. The Invention of Female-On-A-Pedestal (Industrial Revolution)

    6. Evolution of marriage relations and the value of the sexes and an Illustration of why the separation of church, law, and state are so important

    7.  The pre and postware capture of the church by the Jewish invasion of the academy, converting it from Christian cooperation to Jewish conflict and undermining

    8. So we are stuck with the future where debt, economy, geostrategy, political systems, … and without a reformation that cannot be produced by an authority like the church, but must include the science, law, economics, AND moral narrative that makes us survive. Marriage is the first corporation, developed under agrarianism, which began the possibility of the accumulation of capital or what we call complex ‘property’, and the resulting far more complex common property that was then possible – the institutions of cultural production of cooperation destpie sex, class, age, family, clan, tribe and national differences. And that’s what relationships consist of: opportunities for reciprocal exchange, by the only condition in life where you can exchange putting another’s interests ahead of yours, because they are polar opposites. Exhaust opportunity, resource, or charge. It’s just physics. Sorry. This is a little closer to the voice I’m developing now that we’ve ended the century of romantic love. I think that’s the direction I want to work on, because that’s where I sense we are headed. The romantic dream American dream enlightenment dream all end together. Yep.   We have a lot of relationship mythology to unlearn – and most of it was developed during the victorian era, but not practiced until later, just like the chivalric nonsense wasn’t practiced until far later. These are class mythos sold to uplifted lower classes.

  • OCTOBER 16th CHAT TOPICS Indexed by topic, so you can scan. TOPICS 0:0:00 Introd

    OCTOBER 16th CHAT TOPICS
    Indexed by topic, so you can scan.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9ue7fr4zxw

    TOPICS
    0:0:00 Introduction and list of topics
    0:5:24 First Topic: P-Law is now close to accessible to a college freshman level
    0:15:47 Second Topic: Female Prosocial Behavior

    0:29:44 Q&A Part One (some very good ideas in here)
    0:29:52 Can we Bring it Down to High School Level
    0:32:10 The Explanatory power of P for the behavior of men and women.
    0:34:04 Trifunctionalism and Flywheels
    0:35:42 Seduction spectrum vs force spectrum : they’re value-neutral resources
    0:41:00 The most valuable thing we can offer women is the metrics of their value to the commons
    0:44:12 The Noble Task

    0:45:40 Third Topic: The Trivial Mathematics of Human Nature (The Future)

    0:59:43 Q&A Part Two – some great ideas in here.
    0:59:56 Neandertal brains – can’t deduce much
    1:00:45 Should we continue space exploration?
    1:04:08 Need for Free Cities vs States
    1:04:52 New Energy Sources?
    1:06:34 Scarcity and the Infinite Universe?
    1:07:03 Mathematical Platonism in Physics (Mathiness)

    1:11:41 Fourth Topic: China. Xi/CCP vs our high cost of helping china evolve.

    1.17:30 Q&A Part Three
    1:17:38 Brain, Consciousness: Yes consciousness is solved, and it’s not complicated.
    1:33:05 Do we have a soul? Well…
    1:34:55 More on consciousness and memory
    Closing


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-16 19:21:57 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107112832539017989

  • THE SCIENCE OF P-LAW Outline 1. Ternary logic of the Universe 2. Evolutionary Co

    THE SCIENCE OF P-LAW

    Outline
    1. Ternary logic of the Universe
    2. Evolutionary Computation and causal chains
    3. Continuous recursive disambiguation of accumulating opportunity

    4. Acquisition, Demonstrated Interest, Reciprocity, Testimony.
    5. Trifunctionalism (Ternary logic of cooperation and coercion)
    6. Perfect Government

    7. Group Evolutionary Strategies.
    8. European group evolutionary strategy – The Masculine Eugenic
    9. Jewish group evolutionary strategy – The Feminine Dysgenic

    10. Disambiguation by enumeration serialization and operationalization
    11. Operational Grammar
    12. The Grammars
    13. Truth and
    14 Denial, Deceit, Fraud

    15. The Law Completed
    16. Reforms.
    11. The Course and Conduct of Reformation


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-16 13:14:12 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107111386456461629

  • Five Types of Female Friends: 1. Caretaker (Sister, Mother) 2. Fun Time Friend (

    Five Types of Female Friends:
    1. Caretaker (Sister, Mother)
    2. Fun Time Friend (Risk Taker, Courageous)
    3. Independent Woman Friend (Mentor, emotional maturity)
    4. One-On-One Friend (Connection)
    5. Toxic Friend (Negative, Aggressive, Emotionally Draining)
    (Via Anna.)


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-15 20:08:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1449104957710417923

  • 9. Group Evolutionary Strategies. 10. European group evolutionary strategy 11. J

    9. Group Evolutionary Strategies.
    10. European group evolutionary strategy
    11. Jewish group evolutionary strategy
    12. Reforms. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1449069949243297803

  • 1. Ternary logic 2. Evolutionary Computation 3. Continuous recursive disambiguat

    1. Ternary logic
    2. Evolutionary Computation
    3. Continuous recursive disambiguation
    4. Disambiguation by enumeration serialization and operationalization
    5. Operational Grammar
    6. The Grammars
    7. Acquisition, Demonstrated Interest, Reciprocity, Testimony.
    8. Trifunctionalism.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-15 17:49:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1449069949243297803

  • The most important knowledge we can possess in society is not taught (on purpose

    The most important knowledge we can possess in society is not taught (on purpose): 1. Behavioral and Micro Econ. and Cognitive Biases. Basic 2.Natural Law (reciprocity, contract, tort). 3.Basic Accounting and finance. 4.Basic Project management (the suite of methods).


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-15 15:18:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1449031981677830147

    Reply addressees: @EPoe187

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1449030823060115493


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EPoe187 BO: and 5) all human cooperation reduces the time cost of returns on acquisition – loss aversion. 6) Ergo we are not wealthier than cavemen, we have made everything cheaper in cost of time.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1449030823060115493

  • Realism > Naturalism > Evolutionary Construction > First Principles > Logic > Vo

    Realism > Naturalism > Evolutionary Construction > First Principles > Logic > Vocabulary.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-04 16:27:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1445063142132920323

  • 1) Science, logic, and law depend on reason. 2) Reason depends on auto associati

    1) Science, logic, and law depend on reason.
    2) Reason depends on auto association, prediction, attention, recursion (wayfinding).
    3) This is because all human cognition evolves out of movement (embodiment).
    Once ‘science’ is disambiguated then philosophy is limited to choice.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-09-30 21:15:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1443685987138289667

    Reply addressees: @FedorLives1889 @AlexAndBooks_

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1443684914726006791