Via Negativa, Via Practica, Via Positiva
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-02 11:04:00 UTC
Via Negativa, Via Practica, Via Positiva
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-02 11:04:00 UTC
CHAPTER STRUCTURE OF 48 LAWS, USING ONE CHAPTER
(I am a fan of this model, and would like to extend Propertarianism into this format, and add examples in multiple forms of literature. So that the unification of every system of thought is more obvious)
#3 – CONCEAL YOUR INTENTIONS. (<<< LAW )
(EXPLANATION >>> )
Keep people off-balance and in the dark by never revealing the purpose behind your actions. If they have no clue what you are up to, they cannot prepare a defense. Guide them far enough down the wrong path, envelop them in enough smoke, and by the time they realize your intentions, it will be too late.
TRANSGRESSION (<<<VIA NEGATIVA)
The Marquis de Sevigne was young and inexperienced in the art of love. He confided in the infamous courtesan of seventeenth-century France, Ninon de Lenclos, to instruct him on how to seduce a difficult young countess. She made him follow a plan over a number of weeks, where the Marquis would be appearing in public always surrounded by beautiful women, in the very places the countess would be expected to see him. He was supposed to assume an air of nonchalance. This increased the jealousy of the young countess, who was not sure of his interest in her. One day the Marquis, unable to control his passion, broke from Ninon’s plan, and blurted out to the countess that he loved her. After this admission, the countess no longer found him interesting and avoided him.
OBSERVANCE (<<< VIA POSITIVA)
Otto von Bismarck was a deputy in the Prussian parliament at a time when many fellow deputies thought it was possible to go to war against Austria and defeat it.
Bismarck knew the Prussian army was not prepared, so he devised a clever way to keep the war at bay. He publicly stated his praises for the Austrians and talked about the madness of war. Many deputies changed their votes. Had Bismarck announced his real intentions, arguing it was better to wait now and fight later, he would not have won. Most Prussians wanted to go to war at that moment and mistakenly believed their army to be superior to the Austrians. Had he gone to the king his sincerity would have been doubted. By giving misleading statements about wanting peace and concealing his true purpose, Bismarck’s speech catapulted him to the position of prime minister. He later led the country to war against the Austrians at the right time, when he felt the Prussian army was more capable.
WISDOM (<<< ACTIONS)
• Use decoyed objects of desire and red herrings to throw people off scent.
• Use smoke screens (a poker face) to disguise your actions.
• False sincerity is one powerful tool that will send your rivals on a wild goose chase.
• Publicly declare your false intentions to give misleading signals.
• A noble gesture can be a smoke screen to hide your true intentions.
• Blend in and people will be less suspicious.
REMEMBER
It takes patience and humility to dull your brilliant colors, to put on the mask of the inconspicuous. Do not despair at having to wear such a bland mask-—it is often your unreadability that draws people to you and makes you appear a person of power.
AUTHORITY
Have you ever heard of a skillful general, who intends to
surprise a citadel, announcing his plan to his enemy? Conceal your
purpose and hide your progress; do not disclose the extent of your
designs until they cannot be opposed, until the combat is over. Win
the victory before you declare the war. In a word, imitate those war-
like people whose designs are not known except by the ravaged country through which they have passed. (Ninon de Lenclos, 1623-1706)
REVERSAL (<<< REVERSAL – JUST LIKE IT SAYS)
No smoke screen, red herring, false sincerity, or any other diversionary device will succeed in concealing your intentions if you already have an established reputation for deception. And as you get older and achieve success, it often becomes increasingly difficult to disguise your cunning.
Everyone knows you practice deception; persist in playing naive and you run the risk of seeming the rankest hypocrite, which will severely limit your room to maneuver. In such cases it is better to own up, to appear the honest rogue, or, better, the repentant rogue. Not only will you be admired for your frankness, but, most wonderful and strange of all, you will be able to continue your stratagems.
As P. T. Barnum, the nineteenth-century king of humbuggery, grew
older, he learned to embrace his reputation as a grand deceiver. At one point he organized a buffalo hunt in New jersey, complete with Indians and a few imported buffalo. He publicized the hunt as genuine, but it came off as so completely fake that the crowd, instead of getting angry and asking for their money back, was greatly amused. They knew Barnum pulled tricks all the time; that was the secret of his success, and they loved him for it. Learning a lesson from this affair, Barnum stopped concealing all of his
devices, even revealing his deceptions in a tell-all autobiography. As
Kierkegaard wrote, “The world wants to be deceived.”
Finally, although it is wiser to divert attention from your purposes by
presenting a bland, familiar exterior, there are times when the colorful, conspicuous gesture is the right diversionary tactic. The great charlatan mountebanks of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Europe used humor and entertainment to deceive their audiences. Dazzled by a great show, the public would not notice the charlatans’ real intentions. Thus the star charlatan himself would appear in town in a night-black coach drawn by black horses. Clowns, tightrope walkers, and star entertainers would accompany
him, pulling people in to his demonstrations of elixirs and quack potions. The charlatan made entertainment seem like the business of the day; the business of the day was actually the sale of the elixirs and quack potions.
Spectacle and entertainment, clearly, are excellent devices to conceal your intentions, but they cannot be used indefinitely. The public grows tired and suspicious, and eventually catches on to the trick. And indeed the charlatans had to move quickly from town to town, before word spread that the potions were useless and the entertainment a trick. Powerful people with bland exteriors, on the other hand—the Talleyrands, the Rothschilds, the Selassies—can practice their deceptions in the same place throughout their lifetimes. Their act never wears thin, and rarely causes suspicion. The colorful smoke screen should be used cautiously, then, and
only when the occasion is right.
(IMAGERY – IN POETIC VERSE >>> )
Image: A Sheep’s Skin.
A sheep never marauds,
a sheep never deceives,
a sheep is magnificently
dumb and docile. With a
sheepskin on his back,
a fox can pass right
into the chicken coop.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-01 12:56:00 UTC
https://propertarianism.com/2017/03/30/the-courses-in-natural-law-propertarianism/FULL COURSE OUTLINE IN NATUAL LAW (RULE)
( I SCARED MYSELF )
(I dunno which is more frightening: the fact that it’s so much work to produce and teach(administer), or the fact that I know enough about the scope of human knowledge that I can teach all these classes. I guess having a scary memory is a good thing.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-31 10:49:00 UTC
What Else?
How Long It Will Take?
How long would it take you to learn to program a computer in an object oriented language? To study Calculus? To Study Accounting? To Study Economics? To study the law? Any technical discipline with it’s own methods and terminology takes about a year to ‘learn’, two years to feel comfortable with, and three years to be effective with, four years to be creative with, and five or six years to master: the 10,000 hour rule. This is just a rule of thumb when discussing how long it takes for humans to learn anything at all. Some of us are faster and some of us slower, but in general, those who are faster can tolerate accumulating hours more so than those who are slower. But in the end, it’s hours.
That said, if you read the Short Courses and watch the Videos, in one month you will see how it all fits together, and in three months you will find that it has affected your thinking.
Our experience is that on average, if you read the articles, follow me, Eli, and a few others, that in six months you will ‘understand’ everything we say. It will take you about a year to ‘start thinking’ in Natural Law – and that’s when you’ll feel the explanatory power starts affecting your life. Then, sort of like a light switch, over a very short period of time, all human activity will ‘make sense’ in very simple terms. “Everything becomes obvious.”
If you have come to Propertarianism through the usual route: Constitutionalist or Classical Liberal > Libertarian > Anarcho Capitalist > NRx > Propertarianism, then your progress will be much faster.
If you have studied one of the hard sciences so that you are familiar with the scientific method and scientific epistemology, then your progress will be faster.
If you have at least some understanding of accounting, finance, or economics, then it will be much faster.
If you have a background in philosophy – it might actually slow you down: most of philosophy, like most of religion, is nonsense or outright falsehood: fantasy literature.
(If you have abnormal behavior and you’re looking for justification of it, you won’t find it here – you will find that there is a differences between tolerance and advocacy and abnormal behavior is not something that will be sanctioned in any society for long. Go see the left libertarians. They love deviant, selfish, anti-social behavior.)
But in general the more you know the easier it will be to learn.
What Else?
How Long It Will Take?
How long would it take you to learn to program a computer in an object oriented language? To study Calculus? To Study Accounting? To Study Economics? To study the law? Any technical discipline with it’s own methods and terminology takes about a year to ‘learn’, two years to feel comfortable with, and three years to be effective with, four years to be creative with, and five or six years to master: the 10,000 hour rule. This is just a rule of thumb when discussing how long it takes for humans to learn anything at all. Some of us are faster and some of us slower, but in general, those who are faster can tolerate accumulating hours more so than those who are slower. But in the end, it’s hours.
That said, if you read the Short Courses and watch the Videos, in one month you will see how it all fits together, and in three months you will find that it has affected your thinking.
Our experience is that on average, if you read the articles, follow me, Eli, and a few others, that in six months you will ‘understand’ everything we say. It will take you about a year to ‘start thinking’ in Natural Law – and that’s when you’ll feel the explanatory power starts affecting your life. Then, sort of like a light switch, over a very short period of time, all human activity will ‘make sense’ in very simple terms. “Everything becomes obvious.”
If you have come to Propertarianism through the usual route: Constitutionalist or Classical Liberal > Libertarian > Anarcho Capitalist > NRx > Propertarianism, then your progress will be much faster.
If you have studied one of the hard sciences so that you are familiar with the scientific method and scientific epistemology, then your progress will be faster.
If you have at least some understanding of accounting, finance, or economics, then it will be much faster.
If you have a background in philosophy – it might actually slow you down: most of philosophy, like most of religion, is nonsense or outright falsehood: fantasy literature.
(If you have abnormal behavior and you’re looking for justification of it, you won’t find it here – you will find that there is a differences between tolerance and advocacy and abnormal behavior is not something that will be sanctioned in any society for long. Go see the left libertarians. They love deviant, selfish, anti-social behavior.)
But in general the more you know the easier it will be to learn.
PERFECT GOVERNMENT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/05/25/perfect-government/ THE METHODS OF PRODUCTION OF COMMONS IN MARKET GOVERNENT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/07/market-production-of-commons/ THE NON OBVIOUS BENEFITS OF MARKET GOVERNMENT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/01/the-non-obvious-benefits-of-market-government/ PERFECT GOVERNMENT DEFEATS DECEIT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/17/we-can-create-a-perfect-government-for-opposing-propaganda-and-deceit/ THE STRUGGLE FOR RULE OF LAW – AND AGAINST DISCRETIONARY RULE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/07/evolution-of-a-condition-of-liberty-the-struggle-from-discretionary-to-non-discretionary-to-market-rule/ IT DOESN”T MATTER WHO RULES, ONLY THAT WE DENY PEOPLE RULE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/04/24/it-doesnt-matter-who-rules-only-that-we-deny-people-rule/
POLITICS FOR DUMMIES https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/19/politics-for-dummies/ PEOPLE ARE PROTECTED BY RULE OF LAW, THE MILITARY, AND THE MILITIA, NOT GOVERNMENT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2012/12/19/property-is-necessary-for-a-market-society-is-the-market-government-is-the-administration-of-the-market-how-do-we-create-good-government/ OUR MISTAKEN EMPHASIS ON GOVERNMENT INSTEAD OF JURIDICAL DEFENSE FROM IT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/08/24/our-mistaken-emphasis-on-government-rather-than-juridical-defense-from-it/ IS DEMOCRACY REALLY THE PROBLEM? https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/30/is-the-problem-really-democracy-here-is-your-answer/ POLITICAL PREFERENCE IS REDUCIBLE TO GENETIC STRATEGY https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/19/political-preference-is-reducible-to-genetic-strategy/ MODELS OF GOVERNMENTS ARE STRATEGIES IN A GIVEN CONTEXT, NOT UNIVERSAL GOODS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/15/strategies-not-steady-states/ WE USE THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT WE CAN AFFORD https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/17/31847/ FASCISM https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/01/fascism-in-the-great-game-of-rock-paper-scissors/ https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/25/more-on-market-fascism/
PERFECT GOVERNMENT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/05/25/perfect-government/ THE METHODS OF PRODUCTION OF COMMONS IN MARKET GOVERNENT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/07/market-production-of-commons/ THE NON OBVIOUS BENEFITS OF MARKET GOVERNMENT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/01/the-non-obvious-benefits-of-market-government/ PERFECT GOVERNMENT DEFEATS DECEIT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/17/we-can-create-a-perfect-government-for-opposing-propaganda-and-deceit/ THE STRUGGLE FOR RULE OF LAW – AND AGAINST DISCRETIONARY RULE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/07/evolution-of-a-condition-of-liberty-the-struggle-from-discretionary-to-non-discretionary-to-market-rule/ IT DOESN”T MATTER WHO RULES, ONLY THAT WE DENY PEOPLE RULE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/04/24/it-doesnt-matter-who-rules-only-that-we-deny-people-rule/
POLITICS FOR DUMMIES https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/19/politics-for-dummies/ PEOPLE ARE PROTECTED BY RULE OF LAW, THE MILITARY, AND THE MILITIA, NOT GOVERNMENT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2012/12/19/property-is-necessary-for-a-market-society-is-the-market-government-is-the-administration-of-the-market-how-do-we-create-good-government/ OUR MISTAKEN EMPHASIS ON GOVERNMENT INSTEAD OF JURIDICAL DEFENSE FROM IT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/08/24/our-mistaken-emphasis-on-government-rather-than-juridical-defense-from-it/ IS DEMOCRACY REALLY THE PROBLEM? https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/30/is-the-problem-really-democracy-here-is-your-answer/ POLITICAL PREFERENCE IS REDUCIBLE TO GENETIC STRATEGY https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/19/political-preference-is-reducible-to-genetic-strategy/ MODELS OF GOVERNMENTS ARE STRATEGIES IN A GIVEN CONTEXT, NOT UNIVERSAL GOODS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/15/strategies-not-steady-states/ WE USE THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT WE CAN AFFORD https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/17/31847/ FASCISM https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/01/fascism-in-the-great-game-of-rock-paper-scissors/ https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/25/more-on-market-fascism/
HORIZONTAL CLASS CLASS MEANS REPRODUCTIVE VALUE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/06/29/definition-of-class-reproductive-value/ THREE COERCIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND THE THREE VERTICAL CLASSES (DIAGRAM) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2011/02/15/rock-paper-scissors-three-coercive-technologies-and-three-social-classes/ MORE ON VERTICAL CLASSES https://propertarianinstitute.com/2013/11/26/propertarian-class-theory/ HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CLASSES https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/17/using-horizontal-and-vertical-classes/ THE INTERTEMPORAL DIVISION OF MORAL PERCEPTION BETWEEN CLASSES (DIAGRAM) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/06/19/the-intertemporal-division-of-moral-perception/ THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CLASSES https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/17/the-functions-of-the-classes-2/ ECONOMIC (POLITICAL) METHODS AS EXPRESSION OF CLASS PHILOSOPHY https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/11/08/economic-methodologies-as-expressions-of-class-philosophy-and-reproductive-strategy/ IQ EDUCATION AND OCCUPATION https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/01/levels-of-education/ DEFINING MIDDLE CLASS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/17/qa-curt-what-defines-middle-class/ WHY SO LITTLE CLASS ROTATION? https://propertarianinstitute.com/2014/06/06/why-so-little-social-class-rotation-nature-all-nature/ THE REPRODUCTIVE CLASS HIERARCHY https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/18/reproductive-classes/ — POLITICS — CLASS INTERPRETATIONS OF LIBERTIES https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/24/class-liberties/ CLASSES REQUIRE DIFFERENT ECONOMIES (THERE IS NO SINGLE BEST) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/25/different-economies-for-different-classes/ THREE ORDERS: KIN, CULT, STATE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/14/the-three-orders-kin-cult-state/ KIN, CLASS, CASTE POLITICAL SYSTEMS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/25/kin-class-caste-models-and-functions/ THE MEANS OF RULE – EACH CONTEXT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/17/series-means-of-rule/ WHY MINORITY RULE IS SUPERIOR TO MAJORITY https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/03/adding-depth-to-talebs-insight-that-minority-rule-is-superior-to-majority/ — MARRIAGE AND CIVILIZATION — THE ORIGINS OF CIVILIZATION, SOVEREIGNTY, PROPERTY, MILITIA, MARRIAGE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/23/the-origins-of-civilization-militia-property-marriage/ THE IMPORTANCE OF THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE AS COMPROMISE BETWEEN GENDERS – A TRADE. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/05/01/on-marriage/ HOW DO FAMILY STRUCTURES VARY? https://propertarianinstitute.com/2014/08/26/how-do-family-structures-vary/ DOMESTICATION BY FAMILY UNIT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/07/domestication-by-family-unit/ MORALS REFLECT GENETIC DISTANCE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/15/morals-reflect-genetic-distance/
HORIZONTAL CLASS CLASS MEANS REPRODUCTIVE VALUE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/06/29/definition-of-class-reproductive-value/ THREE COERCIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND THE THREE VERTICAL CLASSES (DIAGRAM) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2011/02/15/rock-paper-scissors-three-coercive-technologies-and-three-social-classes/ MORE ON VERTICAL CLASSES https://propertarianinstitute.com/2013/11/26/propertarian-class-theory/ HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CLASSES https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/17/using-horizontal-and-vertical-classes/ THE INTERTEMPORAL DIVISION OF MORAL PERCEPTION BETWEEN CLASSES (DIAGRAM) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/06/19/the-intertemporal-division-of-moral-perception/ THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CLASSES https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/17/the-functions-of-the-classes-2/ ECONOMIC (POLITICAL) METHODS AS EXPRESSION OF CLASS PHILOSOPHY https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/11/08/economic-methodologies-as-expressions-of-class-philosophy-and-reproductive-strategy/ IQ EDUCATION AND OCCUPATION https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/01/levels-of-education/ DEFINING MIDDLE CLASS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/17/qa-curt-what-defines-middle-class/ WHY SO LITTLE CLASS ROTATION? https://propertarianinstitute.com/2014/06/06/why-so-little-social-class-rotation-nature-all-nature/ THE REPRODUCTIVE CLASS HIERARCHY https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/09/18/reproductive-classes/ — POLITICS — CLASS INTERPRETATIONS OF LIBERTIES https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/24/class-liberties/ CLASSES REQUIRE DIFFERENT ECONOMIES (THERE IS NO SINGLE BEST) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/25/different-economies-for-different-classes/ THREE ORDERS: KIN, CULT, STATE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/14/the-three-orders-kin-cult-state/ KIN, CLASS, CASTE POLITICAL SYSTEMS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/11/25/kin-class-caste-models-and-functions/ THE MEANS OF RULE – EACH CONTEXT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/17/series-means-of-rule/ WHY MINORITY RULE IS SUPERIOR TO MAJORITY https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/03/adding-depth-to-talebs-insight-that-minority-rule-is-superior-to-majority/ — MARRIAGE AND CIVILIZATION — THE ORIGINS OF CIVILIZATION, SOVEREIGNTY, PROPERTY, MILITIA, MARRIAGE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/23/the-origins-of-civilization-militia-property-marriage/ THE IMPORTANCE OF THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE AS COMPROMISE BETWEEN GENDERS – A TRADE. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/05/01/on-marriage/ HOW DO FAMILY STRUCTURES VARY? https://propertarianinstitute.com/2014/08/26/how-do-family-structures-vary/ DOMESTICATION BY FAMILY UNIT https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/07/domestication-by-family-unit/ MORALS REFLECT GENETIC DISTANCE https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/10/15/morals-reflect-genetic-distance/
THE FOUR STANDARD HOME DESIGNS
a) Hot or Temperate Climate:
Defensive, Suburban, Urban
One floor, Double-walled, air-gap or insulated, brick or concrete block, with exterior stucco, interior plaster, in traditional courtyard design, with tall interior facing windows, with interior-facing roof, with downspouts (filtered) feeding central cistern (water pool).
Minimum interior wet-walls, Traditional under-window steam heat, off traditional boiler, off natural-fuel iron stove. Every civilization discovered it. Any man can build it. And it doesn’t get any better than that. Start with one building, add a wing at a time, until you have a donut. Main, kitchen, dining. Wing left bedrooms. Wing right Living Room and Office. Wing Main Entry, Parents/Grandparents Apt (or workshop or shop)
b) Temperate climate
Territorial views. Non-defensive (security through remoteness)
Reverse the Donut. Cross Design. Mix of one and two floors. Maximum External glass. Main house kitchen, living vaulted ceiling. Right arm, entry and storage. Left Arm Dining. head-arm, Upstairs master suite, downstairs Children’s bedrooms.
c) Cold Climate:
Cube. Raise it. (“Medieval Keep design”) Full basement, only half underground, first floor windows > man-height off the ground.
9′ ceilings, tall windows, defensive shutters. Basement storage, main food formal living dining, second bedrooms and family space, third master suite in roof with dormers.
d) Hard Freeze Climate / “modern tents’.
Cottage. Stick houses are cheap, can be insulated like hell, and resist earthquakes. But they are ‘cottages’ not ‘houses’ and certainly not defensible, or durable keeps. And they have no sound dampening or thermal mass.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-30 11:57:00 UTC