Curt Doolittle

Form: Outline

  • DO YOU SEE THE PATTERN OF PREDATION? 1) Marxism and Postmodernism kill hosts by

    DO YOU SEE THE PATTERN OF PREDATION?

    1) Marxism and Postmodernism kill hosts by creating the moral hazard of hyperconsumption and dysgenia. (1850-present)

    2) Christianity kills hosts by manufacturing both ignorance and ‘tolerance’ of predation. ( 100 – Present )

    3) Islam kills hosts by raiding, predation, parasitism, ignorance, and dysgenia. ( 600 – present )

    4) Judaism kills hosts by alliance with the state against the people, financial parasitism, pollution of the normative commons by creation of hazards, and destruction of trust. ( 500BC to present.)

    You do see that pattern, don’t you?

    There is only one moral rule: natural law. Perfect reciprocity. Beyond that rule, all violence is licensed by nature and nature’s god.

    Abrahamism has been deadlier than the black plague.

    END ABRAHAMISM – CANCER OF THE MIND

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-22 15:09:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM’S CLASS STRUCTURE MATRIX HORIZONTAL CLASSES 1) Genetic Class (ge

    PROPERTARIANISM’S CLASS STRUCTURE MATRIX

    HORIZONTAL CLASSES

    1) Genetic Class (genetic)

    2) Social Class (cultural)

    3) Occupational Class (learned)

    4) Economic Class (achieved)

    VERTICAL CLASSES

    1) Aristocratic (Force) : Nobility, Martial, Legal, Sheriff, Militia.

    2) Economic (Remuneration) : Finance, Entrepreneur, Professional, Craftsman, Laborer

    3) Priestly (Gossip) : Academic, Public Intellectual, Politician, Priest, Teacher

    4) Caretaker (Care): Doctor, Nurse, Mother, Domestic

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-21 15:25:00 UTC

  • AMERICAN LIMITED LIABILITY MODELS c-corporation: taxes paid directly by the busi

    AMERICAN LIMITED LIABILITY MODELS

    c-corporation: taxes paid directly by the business entity, and shares and authority democratically allocated, and transfer of ownership contractually limited. (Required for public stock offerings.

    s-corporation: taxes paid by the shareholders and shares and authority democratically allocated, and transfer of ownership contractually limited.

    llc: taxes paid by the shareholders and shares and authority contractually allocated, and transfer of ownership contractually limited. Ownership by corporations or individuals. (most simple business structure)

    llp – Limited liability partnership: taxes paid by partners, and authority contractually allocated. Must have at least one managing partner with liability for actions, and all owners must be human, not corporations. (for small professional groups that have junior members, or external investors)

    Partnership – two or more people, no limited liability. Ownership non-transferrable. (stupid)

    Sole proprietorship – no limited liability. (Stupid)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-11 10:06:00 UTC

  • These terms are meaningless without context. THREE POSSIBLE SYSTEMS 1) Axiomatic

    These terms are meaningless without context.

    THREE POSSIBLE SYSTEMS

    1) Axiomatic declarative statements. (mathematics) *proof* of possibility.

    Axiomatic systems consist of construction of proofs of internal consistency ONLY.

    Mathematical systems are axiomatic (declared), informationally complete, and causally trivial therefore deduction is possible.

    Deductivity requires informational completeness. Induction (guessing) requires only information sufficient to guess. Abduction requires nothing more than free association.

    2) Rational justificationary statements.(common law) *justification* of permissiveness.

    Similar to axiomatic systems, justificationary systems, allow us to state that a proposition is permitted or not, but not whether it is true or not.

    3) Theoretic descriptive statements.(science) *truth*. Survival from criticism.

    Theoretic systems: observation > free association > wayfinding > hypothesis > testing, instrumentation and measurement > theory > survival in application in reality > Law.

    Aside from reductio questions, theoretic (descriptive) systems do not allow for deduction. In those special cases we mistakenly call apriori, rather than just ‘trivial’.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 14:22:00 UTC

  • A HIERARCHY OF ARGUMENTATIVE TRUTH (repost) (very useful) (learning propertarian

    A HIERARCHY OF ARGUMENTATIVE TRUTH

    (repost) (very useful) (learning propertarianism)

    [S]o, just take the next ten arguments that you run into (not by me, I have enough work to do, demonstrate your cunning elsewhere) try to categorize which level of truth the individual is relying upon to make his or her arguments. Once you do this a few times it will become natural for you.

    1) MEANING (Awareness)

    ….True enough to imagine a conceptual relationship

    2) PREFERENCE

    ….True enough for me to feel good about.

    3) ACTIONABILITY

    ….True enough for me to take actions that produce positive results.

    4) MORALITY

    ….True enough for me to act but not cause others to react negatively to me.

    5) RATIONALITY

    ….True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion among my fellow people with similar values.

    6) DECIDEABILITY

    ….True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion across different peoples with different values.

    7) TRUTH

    ….True regardless of all opinions or perspectives.

    8) TAUTOLOGY

    ….Tautologically true: in that the two things are equal.

    Awareness, Preference, Actionability Morality, Rationality, Decidability, Truth(parsimony), Tautology.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 11:56:00 UTC

  • GOVERNMENTS IN TIMES OF CONFLICT OR COOPERATION CHANGE/WAR 1) Socialism = centra

    GOVERNMENTS IN TIMES OF CONFLICT OR COOPERATION

    CHANGE/WAR

    1) Socialism = central control of private and commons for the purpose of conducting warfare on one”s own people, for the purpose of transitioning a backward people. Very strong.

    2) Fascism = Central control of the commons. Private control of production. But limited to Autarkic opportunities. Funding of nationalism. (fascism is a means of conducting economic warfare in times of stress). Very strong.

    3) Napoleonism = total mobilization of the public and private economy for military economic and institutional warfare. Very strong.

    —vs–

    STEADY STATE / COMMERCE

    3) Aristocracy / Monarchy (steady state)

    Private ownership of property and commons. but weak.

    2) Republicanism / Oligarchy / Nobility (steady state)

    Private ownership of property and commons but weak.

    1) Social Democracy (steady State)

    Private ownership of property and commons but weak.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 10:03:00 UTC

  • Aryanism (Western Civilization): – Transcendence through Agency: The Goal Of Man

    Aryanism (Western Civilization):

    – Transcendence through Agency: The Goal Of Man.

    – Stoicism: A personal discipline of action: Personal Agency

    – Sovereignty: Interpersonal Agency

    – Natural Law of Reciprocity: Political Agency

    – Markets in Everything as a consequence: Agency in All Things.

    But it is an empirical and meritocratic system.

    It is evolutionary and therefore eugenic.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-08 07:34:00 UTC

  • THREE SYSTEMS 1) Axiomatic declarative statements.(mathematics)*proof* 2) Ration

    THREE SYSTEMS

    1) Axiomatic declarative statements.(mathematics)*proof*

    2) Rational justificationary statements.(common law)*justification*

    3) Theoretic descriptive statements.(science)*truth*

    Testimonialism’s six dimensions of testing constitute a complete method of falsifying (trying to disprove) theoretic statements.

    Theoretic statements are descriptive.

    Axiomatic statements test ONLY internal consistency.

    Testimonial > empirical > rational > axiomatic > identity.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-07 14:02:00 UTC

  • The Relationships Within The Hierarchy of Laws

    THE RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN THE HIERARCHY OF LAWS 1) Laws of Nature: Equilibria: The DISCOVERY of which is the subject of physical science. We can know the first causes of the deterministically equilibrial universe – but we cannot sense them without extensive work. 2) Laws of Man: man is an expensive organism fighting the dark forces of time, ignorance, and scarcity, and must act to acquire, and in acting to acquire, acts rationally (to ensure returns – in the greatest return for the least effort, in the shortest time, with the greatest degree of certainty at the lowest risk); and in acting rationally, must conserve physical, emotional, and mental energy, and expend physical, emotional, and mental effort; and can choose to cooperate with others, prey upon others, or boycott others at all times; and may make use of violence, remuneration, or gossip(lauding/shaming), to do so. 2) Natural Law: Non-Parasitism, leaving Reciprocity as the only possible action, because only by non parasitism do we produce the incentive to cooperate rather than prey upon, retaliate against, or boycott. We can know the first cause of reciprocity through direct observation, and we do know it. We cannot implement reciprocity without extensive work (institutions) which allow us to concentrate our forces. 3) Natural RIghts: The methods of insuring natural law, by an insurer of last resort (militia, military, judiciary, monarchy). We cannot implement those institutions without rules by which institutions may enact processes, independently of subjective opinion. 4) Property in toto: the means of commensurability (measurement) between our actions: changes in state of property in toto exist in reality (laws of nature), limited by the abilities of man’s action (laws of man), violate or do not violate reciprocity (rule of law), and are insured or not insured by institutions (natural rights), and can be measured or not measured by changes in property in toto. FRAMING: Laws of Nature > (limits of, methods of transformation) … Laws of Man > limits of, methods of action) … … Laws of Cooperation > (limits of and methods of cooperation.) … … … Laws of Information > ( limits of and methods true Speech) … … … … Laws of Sentience > (limits and methods of ‘thinking’)

  • The Relationships Within The Hierarchy of Laws

    THE RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN THE HIERARCHY OF LAWS 1) Laws of Nature: Equilibria: The DISCOVERY of which is the subject of physical science. We can know the first causes of the deterministically equilibrial universe – but we cannot sense them without extensive work. 2) Laws of Man: man is an expensive organism fighting the dark forces of time, ignorance, and scarcity, and must act to acquire, and in acting to acquire, acts rationally (to ensure returns – in the greatest return for the least effort, in the shortest time, with the greatest degree of certainty at the lowest risk); and in acting rationally, must conserve physical, emotional, and mental energy, and expend physical, emotional, and mental effort; and can choose to cooperate with others, prey upon others, or boycott others at all times; and may make use of violence, remuneration, or gossip(lauding/shaming), to do so. 2) Natural Law: Non-Parasitism, leaving Reciprocity as the only possible action, because only by non parasitism do we produce the incentive to cooperate rather than prey upon, retaliate against, or boycott. We can know the first cause of reciprocity through direct observation, and we do know it. We cannot implement reciprocity without extensive work (institutions) which allow us to concentrate our forces. 3) Natural RIghts: The methods of insuring natural law, by an insurer of last resort (militia, military, judiciary, monarchy). We cannot implement those institutions without rules by which institutions may enact processes, independently of subjective opinion. 4) Property in toto: the means of commensurability (measurement) between our actions: changes in state of property in toto exist in reality (laws of nature), limited by the abilities of man’s action (laws of man), violate or do not violate reciprocity (rule of law), and are insured or not insured by institutions (natural rights), and can be measured or not measured by changes in property in toto. FRAMING: Laws of Nature > (limits of, methods of transformation) … Laws of Man > limits of, methods of action) … … Laws of Cooperation > (limits of and methods of cooperation.) … … … Laws of Information > ( limits of and methods true Speech) … … … … Laws of Sentience > (limits and methods of ‘thinking’)