Curt Doolittle

Form: Outline

  • PARSIMONIOUS KINSHIP GOVERNMENT Rule of Natural Law, Mandatory Kinship Accountab

    PARSIMONIOUS KINSHIP GOVERNMENT

    Rule of Natural Law,

    Mandatory Kinship Accountability and Insurance,

    Hereditary Monarchy, Regional And Local Nobility.

    Market Fascism (meritocracy), flat taxation on commerce.

    The production of commons either private or monarchic,

    Absent any ‘government’ (Politics).

    Eric Danelaw once you make people accountable for their kin again, the result will be ethno nationalism

    Always use the law to manage incentives, and the desired result will emerge from market forces.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-03 09:14:00 UTC

  • Parsimonious Kinship Government

    Rule of Natural Law, Mandatory Kinship Accountability and Insurance, Hereditary Monarchy, Regional And Local Nobility. Market Fascism (meritocracy), flat taxation on commerce. The production of commons either private or monarchic, Absent any ‘government’ (Politics). Eric Danelaw once you make people accountable for their kin again, the result will be ethno nationalism Always use the law to manage incentives, and the desired result will emerge from market forces.

  • THE TECHNOLOGY OF TRUTHFUL SPEECH [S]cience is a moral discipline wherein we cri

    THE TECHNOLOGY OF TRUTHFUL SPEECH

    [S]cience is a moral discipline wherein we criticize our ideas, so that we can speak them truthfully:

    1 — We test our relations for categorical consistency (identity)

    2— We test our reasoning with logic for internal consistency.

    3— We test our observations with external correspondence.

    4— We test the existential possibilities of our premises by defining them in operational language

    5— We test the rationality of our choices by subjective testing of incentives – all human action is rationally self interested.

    6— We test the morality of our display, word, and deed by reciprocity: reciprocal tests of rationality.

    7— We test the consequences of our theories for externalities (involuntary transfers).

    8— We test the completeness of our statements with a tests of full accounting and limits.

    9— We test the coherence of our statements with this list of constant relations both categorical, internal, external, existential, complete, and limited, including the rational when a matter of personal action, and reciprocal when a matter of interpersonal and political action.

    Once we have tested our theories by these means, then we can say that we speak truthfully – and as such do no harm.

    Because scientific method consists of due diligences necessary to warranty that we speak truthfully. And by truthfully we mean consistent, correspondent, complete, rational, and moral, and laundered of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism and deceit.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-29 08:51:00 UTC

  • Cultural Variants of Truth and the Consequences 1 – Truth and Adherence to Rules

    Cultural Variants of Truth and the Consequences

    1 – Truth and Adherence to Rules are two different things. (submission)

    2 – Truth and Fidelity to Contract are two different things.

    3 – Truth and Duty are two different things.

    4 – Truth and Knowledge are two different things.

    Truth as Adherence – Familialism (most of the world)

    Truth as Fidelity – Tribalism (judaism)

    Truth as Duty – Nationalism (german)

    Truth as Science – Universalism. (english)

    [T]hat members of a community follow rules and conventions with one another, does not require whatsoever that they tell the truth to one another.

    That members of a community fulfill promises or contracts with one another, does not require whatsoever that they tell the truth to one another.

    Another community may both fulfill it’s promises, its contracts, and the commitment to tell the truth at all times regardless of cost.

    The principle of truth to to an Adherence community consists of order. The principle of ‘truth’ to a contract community consists of fidelity. The principle of truth to a truth-telling community consists of ***SCIENCE***.

    If you grasp the profundity of this statement you will understand why some cultures produce science, and some produce trade, and some produce tyranny. Some create science. And some create pseudoscience. And some create only order. Some create science, innovation, trade and trust. Others create only trade, and others create only utilitarian applications of tools.

    Small things in large numbers have vast consequences.

    When we use ‘functions” such as the verb to be, or the word ‘truth’ we do not really understand their construction, just that they are shorthand approximations that tend to work. We have just knowledge of use, not knowledge of construction.

    But the word ‘true’ means very different things in different places: science, fidelity, and adherence.

    And the consequences are astounding.

    Truth is a performative declaration. Truth claims then, to different groups, state either epistemology, fidelity, or adherence.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-29 08:51:00 UTC

  • Conservatism Understood

    1. A conservative questions overestimation of reason, and above all questions consensus. 2. As a means of questioning, a conservatives requires reciprocity (tort): american < british < anglo saxon < germanic < european < norther indo european in law. That law evolved from the oath (tell the truth, never steal, never flee, in combat). 3. Conservatism requires ‘empirical’ results, and where empirical fails ‘traditional’ since traditional survived empirical tests of reality. 4. Accumulates genetic, cultural, normative, institutional, physical, and territorial capital, attempting to pass on to future generations of his family, more than he himself inherited. 5. Conservatism is a eugenic reproductive strategy that increases accumulated capital through intergenerational transfer, using intergeneration lending, in order to produce increasingly ‘noble’ families. 6. Ergo successful individuals in the market for craftsmanship, successful purchase of the franchise through military service, successful individuals in the market for marriage and child rearing, successful individuals in the market for industry, successful families in the market for noble (intergenerational) families. 7. In other words, conservatism(aristocracy) is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy. And while bipartite manorialism was practiced from 700, and aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year after 1000, and an attempt to escape church-state nobility, and create an entrepreneurial nobility (meritocracy), succeeded by 1600, there was a great reaction to the english revolution, and a greater reaction to the french revolution. Thus while Locke,smith,hume,adams, and jefferson promised an aristocracy available to everyone, Burke, after the french revolution, and germans after that, recognized that the peasantry was even worse at rule (see russia) than the nobility. The problem with today’s conservatism is that darwin and spencer were famous before the war, after the second world war, conservatism and eugenics were effectively banned from discourse, academy, and science. As such conservatives never (until perhaps 2000) restored empirical discourse to conservatism, because it is antithetical to the experiment with democracy. This changed incrementally beginning in 76, through the 80s, and aggressively since 2000, and more aggressively since 2008. **Soveriengty requires reciprocity Reciprocity requires rule of law (tort), jury(thang, senate, house of lords, supreme court), and an independent judiciary. Rule of law forces markets, since it incrementally suppresses each innovation in parasitism. Markets cause hierarchies, because they are necessary to voluntarily organize production. Markets are eugenic, because they are empirical means of testing industry and impulse. But they make possible liberty for those with property, freedom for those who labor, and subsidy for those who impose no costs on sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or property.** DOMESTICATION Man domesticated the human animal after he had learned to domesticate the non-human animal. And he did so by the same means. And the result in both domestication of the human and non human animal is the same: eugenics. CONSERVATIVES Most conservatives do not write philosophy, they run businesses, or write history, economics, science, and law. (I write because I was successful enough in multiple businesses to spend my time writing full time.) Conservatives are actively suppressed in academy and media. This has been true since the end of the war and teh rise of the Frankfurt School, and the Postmodern school, both of which were necessary after the failure of marxist pseudoscience. (a pseudoscience marx died knowing, since he stopped writing as soon as he read the Mengerians, and kept silent only to keep the checks coming in from Engels.) **AUTHORS TO READ **Burke, Hayek, Burnham, Sowell, Buchanan, Murray, and maybe Nietzsche. Veblen. (The essayists are nonsense) Anyone in Hoover or Heritage institutions. **READING LIST **Propertarianism’s Reading List (https://propertarianinstitute.com/reading-list/). My reading list (above) contains most of the science we’ve been looking for, while the pseudosciences dominated the mid to late 20th century under the marxist-postmodernists. Cheers

  • UNDERSTOOD 1. A conservative questions overestimation of reason, and above all q

    https://propertarianism.com/reading-list/CONSERVATISM UNDERSTOOD

    1. A conservative questions overestimation of reason, and above all questions consensus.

    2. As a means of questioning, a conservatives requires reciprocity (tort): american < british < anglo saxon < germanic < european < norther indo european in law. That law evolved from the oath (tell the truth, never steal, never flee, in combat).

    3. Conservatism requires ‘empirical’ results, and where empirical fails ‘traditional’ since traditional survived empirical tests of reality.

    4. Accumulates genetic, cultural, normative, institutional, physical, and territorial capital, attempting to pass on to future generations of his family, more than he himself inherited.

    5. Conservatism is a eugenic reproductive strategy that increases accumulated capital through intergenerational transfer, using intergeneration lending, in order to produce increasingly ‘noble’ families.

    6. Ergo successful individuals in the market for craftsmanship, successful purchase of the franchise through military service, successful individuals in the market for marriage and child rearing, successful individuals in the market for industry, successful families in the market for noble (intergenerational) families.

    7. In other words, conservatism(aristocracy) is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy. And while bipartite manorialism was practiced from 700, and aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year after 1000, and an attempt to escape church-state nobility, and create an entrepreneurial nobility (meritocracy), succeeded by 1600, there was a great reaction to the english revolution, and a greater reaction to the french revolution. Thus while Locke,smith,hume,adams, and jefferson promised an aristocracy available to everyone, Burke, after the french revolution, and germans after that, recognized that the peasantry was even worse at rule (see russia) than the nobility.

    The problem with today’s conservatism is that darwin and spencer were famous before the war, after the second world war, conservatism and eugenics were effectively banned from discourse, academy, and science.

    As such conservatives never (until perhaps 2000) restored empirical discourse to conservatism, because it is antithetical to the experiment with democracy. This changed incrementally beginning in 76, through the 80s, and aggressively since 2000, and more aggressively since 2008.

    **Soveriengty requires reciprocity

    Reciprocity requires rule of law (tort), jury(thang, senate, house of lords, supreme court), and an independent judiciary.

    Rule of law forces markets, since it incrementally suppresses each innovation in parasitism.

    Markets cause hierarchies, because they are necessary to voluntarily organize production.

    Markets are eugenic, because they are empirical means of testing industry and impulse.

    But they make possible liberty for those with property, freedom for those who labor, and subsidy for those who impose no costs on sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or property.**

    DOMESTICATION

    Man domesticated the human animal after he had learned to domesticate the non-human animal. And he did so by the same means. And the result in both domestication of the human and non human animal is the same: eugenics.

    CONSERVATIVES

    Most conservatives do not write philosophy, they run businesses, or write history, economics, science, and law. (I write because I was successful enough in multiple businesses to spend my time writing full time.)

    Conservatives are actively suppressed in academy and media.

    This has been true since the end of the war and teh rise of the Frankfurt School, and the Postmodern school, both of which were necessary after the failure of marxist pseudoscience. (a pseudoscience marx died knowing, since he stopped writing as soon as he read the Mengerians, and kept silent only to keep the checks coming in from Engels.)

    **AUTHORS TO READ

    **Burke, Hayek, Burnham, Sowell, Buchanan, Murray, and maybe Nietzsche. Veblen.

    (The essayists are nonsense)

    Anyone in Hoover or Heritage institutions.

    **READING LIST

    **Propertarianism’s Reading List (https://propertarianism.com/reading-list/).

    My reading list (above) contains most of the science we’ve been looking for, while the pseudosciences dominated the mid to late 20th century under the marxist-postmodernists.

    CheersUpdated Dec 28, 2017, 10:21 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 22:21:00 UTC

  • Conservatism Understood

    1. A conservative questions overestimation of reason, and above all questions consensus. 2. As a means of questioning, a conservatives requires reciprocity (tort): american < british < anglo saxon < germanic < european < norther indo european in law. That law evolved from the oath (tell the truth, never steal, never flee, in combat). 3. Conservatism requires ‘empirical’ results, and where empirical fails ‘traditional’ since traditional survived empirical tests of reality. 4. Accumulates genetic, cultural, normative, institutional, physical, and territorial capital, attempting to pass on to future generations of his family, more than he himself inherited. 5. Conservatism is a eugenic reproductive strategy that increases accumulated capital through intergenerational transfer, using intergeneration lending, in order to produce increasingly ‘noble’ families. 6. Ergo successful individuals in the market for craftsmanship, successful purchase of the franchise through military service, successful individuals in the market for marriage and child rearing, successful individuals in the market for industry, successful families in the market for noble (intergenerational) families. 7. In other words, conservatism(aristocracy) is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy. And while bipartite manorialism was practiced from 700, and aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year after 1000, and an attempt to escape church-state nobility, and create an entrepreneurial nobility (meritocracy), succeeded by 1600, there was a great reaction to the english revolution, and a greater reaction to the french revolution. Thus while Locke,smith,hume,adams, and jefferson promised an aristocracy available to everyone, Burke, after the french revolution, and germans after that, recognized that the peasantry was even worse at rule (see russia) than the nobility. The problem with today’s conservatism is that darwin and spencer were famous before the war, after the second world war, conservatism and eugenics were effectively banned from discourse, academy, and science. As such conservatives never (until perhaps 2000) restored empirical discourse to conservatism, because it is antithetical to the experiment with democracy. This changed incrementally beginning in 76, through the 80s, and aggressively since 2000, and more aggressively since 2008. **Soveriengty requires reciprocity Reciprocity requires rule of law (tort), jury(thang, senate, house of lords, supreme court), and an independent judiciary. Rule of law forces markets, since it incrementally suppresses each innovation in parasitism. Markets cause hierarchies, because they are necessary to voluntarily organize production. Markets are eugenic, because they are empirical means of testing industry and impulse. But they make possible liberty for those with property, freedom for those who labor, and subsidy for those who impose no costs on sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or property.** DOMESTICATION Man domesticated the human animal after he had learned to domesticate the non-human animal. And he did so by the same means. And the result in both domestication of the human and non human animal is the same: eugenics. CONSERVATIVES Most conservatives do not write philosophy, they run businesses, or write history, economics, science, and law. (I write because I was successful enough in multiple businesses to spend my time writing full time.) Conservatives are actively suppressed in academy and media. This has been true since the end of the war and teh rise of the Frankfurt School, and the Postmodern school, both of which were necessary after the failure of marxist pseudoscience. (a pseudoscience marx died knowing, since he stopped writing as soon as he read the Mengerians, and kept silent only to keep the checks coming in from Engels.) **AUTHORS TO READ **Burke, Hayek, Burnham, Sowell, Buchanan, Murray, and maybe Nietzsche. Veblen. (The essayists are nonsense) Anyone in Hoover or Heritage institutions. **READING LIST **Propertarianism’s Reading List (https://propertarianinstitute.com/reading-list/). My reading list (above) contains most of the science we’ve been looking for, while the pseudosciences dominated the mid to late 20th century under the marxist-postmodernists. Cheers

  • Story>Myth >-Pseudo-history(Fictional History) >+History >Pseudo-law > +Tort Law

    Story>Myth >-Pseudo-history(Fictional History) >+History >Pseudo-law > +Tort Law > Scriptural Fictionalism and Hermeneutics >+Empiricism > Justificationary Rationalism (kant/rousseau,mendelsohn) > +Science > Pseudoscience (Marx,Freud,Boaz,Cantor,Mises) >Operational Science.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-24 13:27:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944922595073445889

    Reply addressees: @plevy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944783727414185984

    IN REPLY TO:

    @plevy

    Media and cultural evolution 📱 https://t.co/POideG59FR

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944783727414185984

  • 1) Apple has (as did Microsoft under Ballmer) abandoned their Content and Softwa

    1) Apple has (as did Microsoft under Ballmer) abandoned their Content and Software creators: advocates.
    2) Apple SHOULD and spin off the BUSINESS, CREATOR, OSX, and “Creator” hardware and software from consumer to insulate it.
    3) When iPhone corrects, Apple Consumer will crash.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-12 21:41:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/940698196073959429

    Reply addressees: @W_O_P_R @PCMag @THErealDVORAK

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/938885195159298049

    IN REPLY TO:

    @W_O_P_R

    @PCMag @THErealDVORAK I agree @THErealDVORAK. The writing is on the wall. The continued roll out of high functioning cloud apps by 3rd parties and the addition of Files to iOS make it inevitable.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/938885195159298049

  • What’s The Difference? 1) Differences

    a) Competition: Without competition (comparison, differences) we have no means of distinction and without distinction we cannot make a choice. Forms of competition: b) Constant Relations: Referrers, Properties, relations, and values are determined by marginally indifferent, comparable, or commensurable Constant Relations vs Inconstant Relations between states. |Comparable|: Identical > Indifferent(in context/limits) > Marginally Indifferent > comparable > commensurable(via intermediary measure) > incommensurable (different) 2) DECIDABILITY DECIDABLE: a) In the REVERSE: a question (statement) is DECIDABLE if an algorithm (set of operations) exists within the limits of the system (rules, axioms, theories) that can produce a decision (choice). In other words, if the sufficient information for the decision is present (ie: is decidable) within the “system”(ie: grammar). b) In the OBVERSE: Instead, we should determine if there is a means of choosing without the need for additional information supplied from outside the system (ie: not discretionary). Or in simple terms, if DISCRETION is necessary the question is undecidable, and if discretion is unnecessary, a proposition is decidable. This separates reason (or calculation in the wider sense) from computation (algorithm). Given these Dimensions: a) Distinguishability (indistinguishable, distinguishably, meaningful(categorical), identifiable(memorable). b) Possibility (unimaginable, imaginable, rational, empirical, operational, unavoidable ) c) Actionability (inactionable,contingently actionable, actionable) d) Population (Self, Others, All, Universal) Yields: a) Indistinguishable(perception) > Distinguishable(cognition) > Memorable(categorical-referrable) > Possible(material) > Actionable(physical) > Choosable(for use) > Preferable(Personal) > Good(interpersonal) > Decidable(political) > True(most parsimonious descriptive name possible)(universal) > Analytic > Tautological. 3) DEMAND FOR DECIDABILITY Demand for Truth (Decidability): a) True enough to imagine a conceptual relationship (mental) b) True enough for me to feel good about myself (psychological) c) True enough for me to take actions that produce positive results (actionable) d) True enough for me to not cause others to react negatively to me. (Moral) e) True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion among my fellow people with similar values. (Normative or legislative) f) True enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion across different peoples with different values. (Natural Law) g) True regardless of all opinions or perspectives. (True (Proper)) h) True for the purposes of internal consistency. (Analytic) h) Tautologically true: in that the two referrers consist of sets (networks) of marginally indifferent in properties in the given context (limits). 4) TRUTH: INFORMATION SUFFICIENT FOR DECIDABILITY IN CONTEXT |TESTIMONY|: IMPULSE > HONESTY > TRUTHFULNESS(Contingent) > TRUTH (Idea) > TRUE (Analytic) > TAUTOLOGY HONESTY: that testimony (description) you give with full knowledge that knowledge is incomplete, your language is insufficient, but you have not performed due diligence in the elimination of error and bias, but which you warranty is free of deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possess of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony. TRUTHFULNESS (TRUE): that testimony (description) you give if your knowledge (information) is incomplete, your language is insufficient, you have performed due diligence in the elimination of error, imaginary content, wishful thinking, bias, and deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and which you warranty to be so; and the promise that another possessed of the knowledge, performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony. IDEAL TRUTH: That testimony (description) you would give, if your knowledge (information) was complete, your language was sufficient, stated without error, cleansed of bias, and absent deceit, within the scope of precision limited to the context of the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possessed of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony. ANALYTIC TRUTH: Internally consistent, independent of external correspondence. In the construction of proofs, open to substitution and independent of context, we produce tests of internal consistency (generally speaking, the preservation of ratios). Or more simply, the preservation of constant relations. TAUTOLOGICAL TRUTH: Marginally indifferent description expressing constant relations between referrers. 4) POSSIBILITY 5) ACTIONABILITY 6) CONTINGENCY (DEPENDENCY) Free-Association( Guess(Uncritical)) > Hypothesis(Critical) > Premise(Assumption)) > Axiom(Declaration) > Identity(tautology) > Differences(consistent and inconsistent relations) ? 7) JUSTIFICATION (MATH, LAW, SCRIPTURE, LITERATURE – UN-INTERROGATABLE.) Thinking > Imagining > Reasoning(external competition) > Argument (Informal Logics)(argumentative competition) > Justification(Formal Logics)(internal competition) > Math(Positional Logics) > category > identity > differences(consistent and inconsistent relations)? 8) JUSTIFICATIONARY OPERATIONS Free Association > Guess > Abduction > Induction > Deduction > Identity(tautology) > differences(consistent and inconsistent relations)? Decidability under Justification: Uses of Justification: 9) LIMITS OF JUSTIFICATION Dependency and Deducibility: Evidence, Argument: No accumulation of justifications (confirmations) can a Closure in any dimension is impossible without appeal to the consequent dimension. 10) REPLACEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION WITH PROSECUTION (FALSIFICATION) 11) PROSECUTORIAL OPERATIONS (WARRANTIES OF DUE DILIGENCE)ATION – INTERROGATABLE) Free association > idea(survives) > hypothesis(survives) > theory(survives) > law(survives) > Identity(tautology)(survives) > differences(consistent and inconsistent relations)(evolves) > [Loop]. 12) PROSECUTORIAL OPERATIONS (WARRANTIES OF DUE DILIGENCE) Falsification(Survival) by Measurement (cardinal, ordinal, decidable)) Dimensions of survival. a) Categorical Consistency (identity) (competition between properties, relations and values and some reference consisting of properties relations and values) b) Internal consistency (logical) c) Observable Consistency (empirical) d) Existential Consistency (operational) e) Rational Consistency (praxeological (rational choice)) f) Moral Consistency (reciprocal) g) Scope Consistency (limits and full accounting) h) Coherence (dimensional consistency). Decidability under Prosecution: ||Incomprehensible > Comprehensible(Decidable) > Possible(Decidable) > Contingent(True, Decidable) > False (Decidable) ……………………….. FALSE……..TRUE(CONTINGENT)……UNDECIDABLE ———————————————————————- FALSE ……………..|..FALSE…….FALSE………………………..UNDECIDABLE TRUE……………….|..FALSE…….TRUE………………………….UNDECIDABLE UNDECIDABLE….|..FALSE…….TRUE………………………….UNDECIDABLE Uses for Prosecution: TABLE OF JUSTIFICATION VS FALSIFICATION JUSTIFICATION (CONSTRUCTION) (“PHILOSOPHY”) Think…Imagine..Reason………InformalLogic…FormalLogic…Identity…Diff F-A ….Statmt….Statement…..Premise…………Axiom………….Identity…Diff. F-A…..Guess…..Abduction…..Induction……….Deduction……Identity…Diff. *F-A = Free Association —vs.— PROSECUTION (SURVIVAL FROM FALSIFICATION) (SCIENCE) F-A……Idea……..Hypoth………Theory……………Law…………..Identity……Diff. F-A……Falsify…..Falsify……….Falsify…………….Falsify………Parsimony…Diff. ….Internal……. ..Internal………External………….Market………Survival…. ‘True’. *True in science – true within scope. RATIONAL Productive…..Fully Informed…… Voluntary…..Warrantied…. Contained. MORAL(RECIPROCAL) Productive ….. Fully Informed …. Voluntary …. Warrantied… Contained … Reciprocal. *Contained = Free from imposition of costs by externality. TESTIMONY A warranty of due diligence in the test of consistency of the categorical, internal, external, existential, reasonable(action), reciprocal (moral), limits, full accounting, and of coherence. We often use the test of consistent(internal), correspondent(External), and coherent (commensurable between dimensions). And we either assume or skip limited and fully accounted, because those are most often supplied by context – however, context fails at non-trivial causal density (economics in particular), but our vulnerability to cherry picking appears endemic, such that without specific demands for limits and full accounting, we are easily suggestible (vulnerable to fraud). DEMAND FOR WARRANTY OF DUE DILIGENCE Mathematics Mathematics constant relations due to composition of all referrers using the single dimension of position (mathematics consists of the constant relation of position, due to the use of what we call ‘Numbers’ but which consist of positional names.) By use of positional names, all relations are reduced to positions in n dimensions. Thus enforcing constant relations. Logics ( Algorithms Empiricism Science [F]alsehood Techniques. 1) Ignorance (of information) 2) Error (in reasoning) 3) Overconfidence 4) Bias, and Wishful thinking 5) Loading, Framing, Suggestion, Obscurantism, 6) Fiction, Inflation, Conflation 7) Fictionalism (idealism, pseudoscience, supernaturalism, (primary means of overloading) 8) Deceit. (full fiction) 9) (Conspiracy – Scale 2) 10) (Propagandism – Scale 3) 11) (Institutionalization – Scale 4) If you cannot answer these questions or do not understand them you cannot know if you speak the truth, or if you are polluting the commons with fantasy, bias, error, or deception. EVIL < IMMORAL < UNETHICAL < |AMORAL| > ETHICAL > MORAL > GOOD. MORAL (USAGE) The term “Moral” can be used in a specific sense or a general sense. Either as behavior that imposes costs anonymously and indirectly, or as a general term to refer to all moral, ethical, and criminal behavior. Specific: 0) In the series criminal, ethical, and moral, criminal refers to overt crimes, ethical to crimes of interpersonal informational asymmetry (crimes against a person you deal with), and moral to indirect crimes of informational asymmetry (crimes against the social order). General: 1) Objective (decidable) morality: non imposition / reciprocity (Productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of imposition of costs against demonstrated investments by externality.) 2) Normative morality: that portfolio of norms that in the aggregate produce a group evolutionary strategy, and therefore immoral and moral actions may be judged objectively or normatively. 3) Subjective moral intuitions: that moral intuition we possess because of the combination of genetics, environment and training, and our attempt to survive genetic , social, and economic competition. These may be judged normatively and objectively. 4) Fictional Morality: those wishful arguments we make.. etc. These may be judged subjectively, normatively, and objectively. CLOSING The question is, how can we speak in a manner that limits the semantics, grammar, and syntax to constant relations that are invulnerable to, resistant to, or which expose, the various falsehoods that skew, eliminate, or replace, existing constant relations?