Curt Doolittle

Form: Outline

  • Contents

    Part 1

    The Natural Law of the European Peoples

    The group evolutionary strategy of the European peoples has remained constant for thousands of years, through the bronze, iron, Mediterranean, continental, steel, naval colonial, and post-war, periods and our traditional law that reinforced that strategy remained constant independent of the various attempts at organizing rule. In this section we codify for the first time, The Natural Law of the European Peoples in ratio-scientific form, not only to explain, and inform, but to prevent repetition of the dark ages past and present, and to provide for the European peoples that which others have codified: a logic and body of law beyond which none may tread by display word or deed – especially those in the military, state, government, treasury, and academy.

    The European People

    ( … )

    1. The Europeans

    The Law of the European People

    The west never had a bible – just a canon; and that canon was written in multiple frames, including scientific, legal, philosophical, normative, literary, and theological. Philosophy, theology, and tradition are just narratives that explain a group strategy in a grammar of wishes. Law is the evidence of what actually occurs, not what is wished for. Our Founding Fathers, through generations of the English civil wars, sought to reduce that canon to constitution. But they lacked the skill we developed in the 20th because of programming, the sciences, and the collapse of the philosophical program. They were successful despite those weaknesses as long as the heroic narrative of the revolution persisted, or what the founders said was dependent upon the moral teachings of the church. The failure of the church to reform in the face of Darwin and the sciences, the replacement of the church with the academy, the capture of the academy by the immoral left, combined with Anti-whiteness, under the guise of privilege, colonialism, and slavery (not unique to whites at all) provided the means of undermining that narrative, and So we must complete the greco-roman-germanic-anglo-american research program and produce that bible in the form of a constitution such that no narrative can undermine it, without causing our retaliation. We need to create the white law – a rational, scientific, western competitor to Jewish law and Muslim sharia. A strict construction from our founding differences: sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, judge and jury, heroism and excellence, family and commons, and the market for voluntary cooperation in all walks of life – that together produce the social-political and economic order most rapidly open to adaptation and innovation. We need a constitution and a law closed to interpretation open to innovation, but beyond which no man, private, public, or foreign may tread. Heroism and excellence, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, and Duty, Judge and Jury, and markets in all aspects of life: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war. That is the secret to western civilization. Sovereignty – and its consequences.

    2. The Law of The European People

    Our Achievements

    ( … link … )

    Our Failings

    ( … link … l

    . . .

    . . .

    Part 2

    Mankind ( Descriptive )

    Existence

    1. Man

    2. Mind and Consiousness

    3. Sex Differences

    4. Personality, Intelligence, Morality

    6. Classes Differences

    7. Species and Races

    Action

    VITRUVIANISM (Paradigm)

    Man is the measure of all things to man. Meaning that man’s categories of cognition are determined by his brain structure and his brain structure is evolved and organized for humans to act at human scale.

    Vitruvianism

    ACQUISITIONISM (Incentives)

    All behavior is reducible to the incentive to acquire interests. We can enumerate those categories of interests we seek to acquire. we remember those things we have invested in as costs, and defend those costs. (our complex interests some of which are our possessions )

    We provide a list of categories that explain the sum total of what people seek to acquire an ‘interest’ in.

    Acquisition and Demonstrated Interest

    EMOTIONS MEASURE (Incentives)

    Emotions Are Reactions to Changes in State of “capital”

    Emotions are reactions to changes in state of “capital” that we either have, or might have: obtaining it, saving it, or holding options on past present and future utility of it. That utility can reduce our physical, intellectual, emotional, reproductive, or time costs. Our “values” influence us in the sense that the value we attribute to any given form of capital varies according to our gender, class, ability, condition, and inventory of existing capital.

    Emotions

    AESTHETICS

    Aesthetics

    AGENCY (will to power)

    ( … )

    Agency

    TRANSCENDENCE

    ( … )

    Transcendence

    Cooperation (Ethics)

    COOPERATION

    “Man Cooperates”

    1 – Man must act cooperatively to disproportionately improve the acquisition of resources. 2 – Man must act to preserve and extend cooperation to preserve the disproportion­ate rewards of acquisition through cooperation.

    TERNARY LOGIC OF COOPERATION

    We don’t start with morality. We start with needing an incentive not to engage in parasitism and predation which for the strong is the preferable state of affairs. The only incentive possible is reciprocity because of the long term gains of scale. Everyone else starts with the presumption that cooperation at any cost is a good. We start with the presumption that only reciprocity is a good. We are right and they are parasites.

    Cooperation

    MAN IS RATIONAL  AND AMORAL – NOT MORAL OR IMMORAL

    Man is rational. He engages in predation when it suits him, parasitism when it is possible, cooperation when it is preferable, and flight when it is necessary.

    Man is not good or bad, he is rational in his choice of cooperation, parasitism, or predation. We must provide him the incentive to choose cooperation. We must not pretend he does not need the incentive.

    Thankfully, through organizing our efforts into myth, ritual, habit, norm, and law, we can raise the cost of predation and parasitism high enough so that man chooses cooperation or flight more often than parasitism or predation.

    Our deprivation of his opportunity for parasitism and predation do not change the nature of man – because man is rational. We simply eliminate those less able to cooperate and produce, and provide disincentives to those that remain, thereby creating an imbalance of incentives and proclivity for cooperation and production.

    Rationality

    IMMORALITY

    Immorality

    RECIPROCITY 

    ( … )

    1. Reciprocity 

    MORALITY

    Science absolutely positively can tell you the answer to ethics and morality.

    Morality, including the moral instincts, consist in reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, where reciprocity consists of limiting our actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer( trade, consumption, harm, destruction, loss) of demonstrated interests free of imposition of costs upon demonstrated interests of others by externality. That’s morality. It’s got to be or evolution (physics) wouldn’t tolerate our existence as a species.

    There is no difference between physics (involuntary change), economics (productive cooperation), and morality (social cooperation), except we have memory so can invest in and borrow from one another across time (. All that varies is the level of immorality tolerated given the stage of development in the current military, political, and economic circumstances.

    So yes, science has told us what manners, ethics, morals, consist of. They cannot tell you what those range of actions will be in three years any more than economics can tell you that, because what constitutes reciprocity within the limits of proportionality, varies with the structure of production of polities, commons, goods, services, and information.

    So we absolutely positively know what the physical and natural laws consist of – because they’re the same – we can judge borrow from one another or invest in one another and punish one another for violating those investments and borrowings (thefts, parasitism, free riding), and we do so by moral intuition we call “altruistic punishment’ – the payment of high personal costs of punishment of others to preserve the high value of trust in cooperation (borrowing, investing) in one another, because of the impossible-to-replace returns on cooperation – wherever cooperation is reciprocal: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary, transfers, and free of negative externality.

    And good luck refuting that scientific claim – because you will not be able to without violating it. It’s a physical law of conscious, cooperative, species beyond which no conscious cooperative species can survive.

    Evil < Immoral < Unethical < Amoral > Ethical > Moral > Good

    2. Morality

    TOLERANCE FORBEARANCE

    ( … )

    Tolerance Forbearance

    VIRTUES

    ( … )

    Virtues

    Production (Economics)

    “Man Produces”

    TIME

    Our first resource is time. our development of action, sentience, intelligence, cooperation, division of labor, writing, narrative, numbers, money, accounting, reason, law and science serves to produce increasing returns on time. When we increase our numbers in physical space we decrease opportunity costs (time). When we increase incremental suppression of parasitism and free riding, we decrease transaction costs (time). trades, money, savings, store time – time to trade with others.

    Time

    DIVISION OF LABORS

    INTERTEMPORAL DIVISION OF PERCEPTION :

    Intertemporal Division of Perception, Cognition, Knowledge, Labor, and Advocacy Humans form a division of perception in that progressives and libertarians have specialist moral intuitions suited to their roles in the community, whereas conservatives give equal weight to the six moral dimensions of (care, fairness, liberty, loyalty, authority, purity). These differences on moral intuitions suit individuals to different roles in a polity:

        • “Conservatives” – Voluntary Organization of Cooperation.
        • “Libertarians” – Voluntary Organization of Production.
        • “Progressives” – Voluntary Organization of Reproduction.

    Humans form a division of cognition in that we can classify people with different levels of ability, from those that learn by repetition, to those that learn by imitation, to those that learn by instruction, to those that learn by reading, to those that can model machines,to those that can synthesize ideas, to those that can model abstractions.

    Humans form a division of knowledge with each containing local information about their inventories of property and specialist knowledge upon which others depend. As we depend more upon the memories and actions of third parties, trust becomes necessary for complex information networks to evolve between humans.

    Humans form multiple divisions of labor, a reproductive division of labor between the genders in the production of new generations and a productive division of labor in the production of goods and services, as well as the production of commons.

    Humans form a division of advocacy where conservatives advocate total constraint on consumption (saving), libertarians advocate meritocratic constraint on consumption (production), and progressives advocate consumption (nurture).

    DIVISION OF LABOR

    The Origin of Our Prosperity

    “We are not wealthier than cavemen, we have merely made everything unimaginably cheaper by voluntarily cooperating in a vast division of perception, cognition, knowledge, advocacy, and labor, using institutions of calculation – all evolutions of language – and institutions that employ them, the most important of which is law and that law we call Tort.”

    Division of Knowledge and LaborCALCULATION – NEURAL ECONOMY

    WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

    Weights and Measures

    INFORMATION

    Instrumentation, Information and Ignorance (and money)

    Information

    MINDFULNESS

    NORMS

    Conformity

    (discount on the opportunity to inform, associate, produce…)

    Signaling,   the conformative economy

    Direction of Conformity

    Manners, Ethics,  Morals, Traditions

    Virtue Signaling Economy

    Virtue Spirals

    Competing Economies

    IDENTITIES

    (identity here)

    STEREOTYPES

    ARCHETYPES

    MYTHOLOGIES

    Compatibility

    “Man is Compatible not Equal”

    VARIATION

    Variation

    Variation in Gender

    Variation in Market Value to Others

    Sexual, social, economic, political, military market value.

    THE NATURAL MARKETS (AND NATURAL MARKET VALUES)

    Information – Informational Market Value

    Association – Social (Status) Market Value

    Reproduction – Sexual Market Value

    Cooperation – Cooperative market value

    Production – Economic Market Value

    Commons – Political Market Value

    Polities – Coercive Market Value

    Wars – Military Market Value

    MAN ORGANIZES POSITIVA AND NEGATIVA

    ( …. )

    COMPATIBILISM

    COMPETITION

    SORTITION (ASSOCIATION) (DISCOUNTS)

    (we sort as much as we organize – important, but not sufficiently explored concept – neighborhoods work etc.)

    ( …  )

    CLASS ORDERS

    ( … ) (genetic sortition)

    Class

    THE THREE COERCIVE TECHNOLOGIES

    ( … )

    Influence

    WEAPONS OF INFLUENCE: 

    Each of the three classes, into which humans divide, specialize in one of the following three coercive technologies:

      • Moral Coercive Power – The use of “words and signals” in order to influence people to behave in a way by the threat of imposition of social costs (opportunity costs).
      • Economic Coercive Power – The use of “money and assets” in order to compel people to behave in a way by the promise of material rewards (good and services).
      • Physical Coercive Power – The use of “armies and weapons” in order to coerce people to behave in a way under the threat of physical violence (physical costs).

    By combined use of the three weapons, a group can coerce quite effectively, the government can use all those weapons to keep control of its subjects, with most people being controlled by propaganda and lies (moral coercion), others being bought with a position in the bureaucracy (economic coercion) and the rest of the malcontents being suppressed by police force (physical coercion).

    Intertemporal Division of Reproductive Perception Knowledge Labor and Advocacy: The difference between the feminine (short term), libertarian (medium term) and conservative (long term) moral biases constitutes an intertemporal division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy.

    The way we ‘calculate’ what is ‘good’ is through voluntary exchanges: cooperation. So the fact that we have different biases provides necessary and advantageous specializations, and our principal problem then is providing ‘markets’ by which we can cooperate and ‘calculate’ group needs through constant exchanges.

    By choice of individual sovereignty, we limit ourselves to natural law. By the choice of natural law we limit ourselves to markets in everything. By limiting ourselves to markets in everything we produce markets for association, cooperation, mating and reproduction, production commerce and trade, the production of commons (government), and the production of polities (Armies and Territories and Rule).

    HORIZONTAL CLASSES (VALUE):  

    For all intents and purposes, with wide individual variation, physical attractiveness (which yes, is a universal), fitness, IQ, and personality, serve as a rough indicator of class.

    For all intents and purposes, intelligence serves as a personality trait – and perhaps the dominant personality trait.

    For all intents and purposes, personality and physique require exercise in order to produce individual fitness. (This being the primary failure of the 20th century – personality training. )

    VERTICAL CLASSES (ABILITY):

    Instead of one class hierarchy there are three. Societies are dominated by some arrangement of these three methods of coercion (Military and law, finance and commerce, priesthood and public intellectuals). Each fights for power, with the core of the population shifting under who best serves them, while at the same time protecting them from outside competition.

    Within those classes we see genetic, social, and economic classes. Genetic roughly reflecting reproductive desirability. Social roughly reflecting manners, norms, and education, and economic/political reflecting achievements.

    SOCIAL ORDERS

    Social

    SOCIAL STRATEGY – VARIATION IN CIVILIZATIONAL SPECIALIZATION

    ( …. ) division of civilizational laborORGANIZATION

    “Man Organizes”

    The markets for organization:  normative, productive, social, political

    ECONOMICS AND CONTRACT

    PRODUCTIVE –  ECONOMIC – BUSINESS ORDERS

    Economic Orders

    FAMILIAL (REPRODUCTIVE) ORDERS

    ( … )

    CIVIL ORDERS

    POLITICAL ORDERS

    POLITICAL ORDERS

    ( … )

    Political

    RELIGION AND

    RELIGIOUS (EDUCATION)

    CIVILIZATION ORDERS

    ( … )

    The Production of Commons

    Civilization consists in the evolutionary institutional production of commons to defeat time at scale

    ( … )

    Civilization

    POWER ORDERS

    Power

    STRATEGY ORDERS

    Group Strategy

    WAR

    “Man Wars”

    WAR ORDERS (Military Strategy)

    War

    . . .

    . . .

    Part 3

    Limitation (Law)

    INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION

    In order to cooperate and expand cooperation, humans require incremental suppression of impositions of cost upon their demonstrated property as relationships move from local to global and become anonymous.

    At first humans organize in order to partially suppress imposition of costs (criminal), namely violence, this results in innovations on parasitism that moves to theft and fraud (ethical), as those get suppressed, we have private property, but parasitism evolves towards deception and organized forms of parasitism (moral and conspiratorial).

    (List of “discounts”: https://propertarianinstitute.com/2013/12/25/the-origins-of-property-as-increasing-prohibitions-on-discounts/)

    As such one can judge the moral state of a polity by comparison with the list of all forms of free-riding and those which they actually suppress by their law.

    By near total suppression of imposed costs and the absolute nuclear family, we force individuals into market cooperation instead of parasitism (which limits parasitism even within the family), this results in a highly eugenic (meritocratic) civilization which suppresses lower class reproduction.

    In order to create incentives for the lower classes to abide by rule of law, they’re compensated with dividends obtained in exchange for forgone opportunities of parasitism and for the policing of the commons.

    LAW

    POSSESSION

    RIGHTS

    JURISPRUDENCE

    COMMONS

    THE INFORMATIONAL COMMONS:

    Humans defend commons into which they have invested resources, that follows from the definition of demonstrated property, as such, we can consider information as a commons and prohibit the “pollution” of that commons as we do with other commons such as rivers.

    As such, a requirement of truthful speech (testimonialism) forms a new kind of warranty, just like warranties given to the quality of goods and services, we must now warrant any information we use in public discourse about matters of commons. This does not mean that we must prohibit conflationary and inspirational discourse in private, for pedagogical, aesthetic and hypothetical (meaningful) purposes.

    Testimonialism stands as a warranty in matters of law (and contract), where the discovery of law must pass through all of the criticisms, for this reason we have both empiricism (as in the common law) and operationalism (strict construction).

    While we protect the life, and property,  the contract of marriage, the physical commons (land, water, air, infrastructure), our institutional commons (govts, laws, even traditions), and even fine arts and monuments; and while we protect the market of products and the market for services, one thing we do not protect is the market for information. We can extend the demand for due diligence that we require in the markets for goods and services to the market for information. But that requires a test of truthful speech: a warranty of due diligence.

    . . .

    . . .

    Part 4

    The Method

    Knowledge (Epistemology)

    EPISTEMOLOGY

    Epistemology

    ADVERSARIALISM

    1. Adversarialism 

    The Method

    1. The Method  

    Argument

    ( … )

    2. The Arguments

    Grammars 

    If you study math, programming, the physical sciences, economics, or law, you will notice the similarity, in that there are n-number of software design patterns at every level of complexity; n-number of physical laws at every level of complexity; there are n-number of economic ideas at every level of complexity; and n-number of properties of law at contract, jurisprudence, and state authority; and you learn the economic ideas by the association with the author, and the legal ideas by association with a case; the programming ideas by label, example or function, and the mathematic ideas at every increase in dimensions (shapes) by the most absurd archaic nonsense language humanly possible.

    That there is a regular, obvious pattern to the available operations at every level of complexity, where a level is defined as the set of operations possible before a subsequent operation is possible. In other words, you can’t make a molecule without an element, or an element without an elementary particle, or an elementary particle without the elementary forces.

    This is what The Grammars in Propertarianism explain.

    This particular pattern will explain language to you in a way that will explain all languages to you whether that language is one we speak, or one consisting of operations possible in the physical, sentient, and social world.

    3. The Grammars

    Decidability

    DECIDABILITY

    We increase the precision of the term ‘true’ by asking whether a question is decidable, presumptively good as a general rule, personally preferable,  useful, possible, undecidable, or unknowable.

    |Decidability| decidable < presumptively good as a general rule < personally preferable < useful < possible <undecidable, < or unknowable

    4. Decidability

    Truth

    TRUTH

    Testimony that provides decidability satisfies the demand for infallibility.

    Testimony

    5. Testimony

    Due Diligence

    6. Due DiligenceWarranty

    7. Warranty

    8. Liability

    9. Restitution, Punishment, Prevention

    Strict Construction

    10. Algorithmic (Strict) Construction

    Constitution

    ( … )

    . . .

    . . .

    Part 5

    Application of the Natural Law

    ( … )

    1. Government and Law

    2. Government

    3. Law

    4. Norms

    5. Marriage and Family

    6. Education

    7. Economics

    8. Physical Science

    9. Mathematics

    10. Philosophy

    11. The Pseudosciences

    12. Religion

    The Pursuit of Non-False Religion

    Natural Law (P-Law) is compatible with religion. It’s that (a) Abrahamic religion is incompatible with testimonial truth; (b) testimonial truth is necessary to suppress de-civilization, destruction, and conquest by islam, judaism, and jewish marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and evolutionary science denialism – the purpose of which is to prevent continued transcendence of many into gods with european understanding of the language and words of the gods: math, science, the laws of nature, and the natural law of man; (c) nature thanks, ancestor thanks, civilizational-hero thanks, archetype thanks, the stoic method of virtue and mindfulness, and the epicurean philosophy, invented by europeans, constitute the only non-false religion we know of other than east asian ancestor worship, buddhist mindfulness, confucian wisdom, and ethnocentrism: self-love.

    We cannot produce a body of law free of falsehood, and that restores unification of church and state, with a religion compatible with the physical, natural, and transcendent laws, that closes the door to another body of undermining with the Abrahamic, female method of destruction of civilization by false promise of unwarrantable freedom from laws of nature, natural law of man, and necessity of evolutionary transcendence of man, baiting into hazard, creating conflict between the elites, classes, genders, and generations, destroying the informational, institutional, civil, familial, commons upon which our high trust civilization depends – and profiting from the managed decline.

    The only difficulty in this process is that christians resist the final reformation of their religion out of abrahamic deceit and into the imitation of Jesus – the invention of the feminine god of those who suffer – compatible with european civilization’s masculine gods, regardless of their names: Washington, Caesar, Jupiter, Dius, Zeus, Ziu, Tyr, Tiwaz, Dayus Pitar “sky father”; Alexander, Mercury, Thor; And the rest – “the gods of those who joy”.

    A non-false religion consists in one that is not in conflict with Laws of Nature, Natural Law, or the Law of Transcendence – the continued evolution of man into omniscience, omnipotence, and immortality, written in the language of those laws – math, science, natural law – that teaches us debt to nature, our ancestors, their heroes, those laws, and adherence to those laws.

    That is the perfect, non false, religion.

    If there is a god or are gods, that is the only religion commensurable with the evidence of their writing, and their words – the laws of the nature universe, and of natural law of man, and of the law of transcendence, the evolution of man into gods.

    (Religion is answered in Part 2 below.)

    13. Aesthetics

    ( … )

    . . .

    . . .

    Part 6

    An Indictment: A Case for War

    A prosecutorial indictment of enemies past and present, as the cause of the conflict. There is blame for the enemy and blame for ourselves. But regardless of blame, we must act for not only our people, our civilization, but to protect mankind from its only existential threat from within.

    (~6000 words.)

    1. The Conflict  

    The Century of The Jewish Counter-Revolution Against Darwin and Darwinian Civilization (core)

    European Civilization’s Eugenic, Darwinian, Strategy The European peoples have been able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically and scientifically faster than all other peoples in the ancient and modern worlds because of our traditions of: … self determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life;

    Where; … the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible,

    Thereby; … advancing productive innovations in each other’s interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses,

    Thereby; … allowing us to divert proceeds from our production to the commons, and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, artistic, scientific, technological, economic adaptive and and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it.

    Therefore; Western civilization is not the first, but it is the fastest, in the prehistoric, ancient, and modern worlds, sovereignty expands human ability most rapidly for the simple reason that market rule, limited by natural law. creates both the most incentive to innovate and change, and the least resistance to innovation and change, that are possible at any given moment.

    The Restoration of European Civilization I – The restoration of Aristotle, the restoration of writing, and the Re-separation of Germanic from Latin Civilization. … 1. 1100-1300- The turn of islam to fundamentalism, the flight of islamic scholars, the return of Aristotle by muslim scholars, their translation into latin, … 2. The European Re-Conquest of spain. … 3. The Evolution of the Hansa and the completion under the Holy Roman Empire of the Rule of Law project, contractualism, individual sovereignty, mobile labor, capital concentration, the corporation. … 3. The Ottoman conquest of Byzantium, fall of Constantinople, the muslim blockade, the search for alternate trade routes, the age of sail, the age of muslim piracy, the age of exploration, the age of colonization.

    II – The First British Scientific Revolution 1600’s+ … 1. Newton 1660, Locke, Smith, Hume. … 2. The defeat of the ottomans, and the final constraint of islam after a thousand years of raids, slaving, piracy, conquest and subjugation.

    III – The Continental Secular Theological Counter-Revolution … 1. The French Counter-Revolution Rousseau (1700’s) … 2. The German Counter-Revolution Kant et al (1800’s)

    IV – The Second Anglo-German Scientific Revolution 1830+ (Menger, Darwin, Spencer, Maxwell, Hilbert…)

    1. The Jewish Pseudoscientific Counter- Revolution 1850 … The anglo enfranchisement of the jews … (a) The Marxist and Jewish undermining of the HRE. … (a) The Bolshevik overthrow of Russian civilization … (b) The Communist Undermining of Germanic civilization … (c) The Communist seizure of power in France. … (d) The Communist, marxist, postmodernist, invasion and undermining of America.

    V – The Anglo American Technological Revolution (Turing, Edison-N, Telecom, Radio, Transistors, Computers,) 1930+ … (a) (Ongoing.)

    The History of The Jewish Counter-Revolution 1. Marxism(1850+): To cast jewish condition as a universal condition. To undermine cooperation between the classes. To undermine white ascent into capital concentration. 2. Freudianism(90′-20’s): To undermine Darwin and Instincts 3. Boasianism(10-20’s): To undermine Darwin and integration 4. Cantor and Bohr: To undermine mathematical realism. 5. Neo-Marxism(50’s+): To undermine Darwinian Cultural Homogeneity. (Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, Antonio Gramsci) 6. Feminism(60’s+): To undermine Darwin and the Family. 7. Postmodernism(70’s+): To undermine Darwin,Truth, Science, Reason. 8. HBD-Denialism(80’s+): To blatantly deny Darwin and Evolution 9. Identitarianism(90’s+): To undermine the Darwinian White Peoples

    The Group Strategy of The Left: Defeat Darwin to Facilitate Separatism. The entire ideology of the left is to resist integration, to preserve their parasitic group strategy, to preserve their female means of undermining, to deny the Darwinian revolution and the necessity of paternal, hierarchical, market meritocratic consumption and reproduction.

    All political conflict is reducible to this question The right practices markets in everything: darwinian evolution. The ideological left denies evolutionary pressure exists. The theological right only debates its cause. This is why the right is ‘right’ even if for the wrong reason.

    LEFT: Maternal, equalitarian, dysgenic devolutionary -vs- RIGHT: Paternal, meritocratic, eugenic evolutionary.

    Revolt. Separate. Continue to Speciate. or Return to our ancestral means of conquest, rule, and darwinian domestication of man by markets.

    2. The Histories

    3. Religion

    This Conflict that Undermines Our Civilization from Within.

    Humans evolved at least three sets of faculties: the physical-sensory, the intuitinistic-emotional, and the rational-intellectual. And we evolved ‘grammars’ (paradigms and logics) to express the experience of those faculties. Because those different experiences require different metrics(systems of measurement) and descriptions (analogies) of expression.

    Scientific experience in scientific testimony, in expressions of empirical natural law (intellectual). Ordinary language for discourse for conduct of daily life (physical). And Mystical experience expressed in poetry, the development of mythical and religious structures that send one down a destination-less path into the ephemeral (intuitionistic-emotional).

    The question is, must they be coherent compatible and commensurable even if they are expressed in different grammars: deflationary-scientific vs inflationary-poetic.

    And my answer is yes. There is no reason for conflict. And it is this conflict that undermines our civlization from within.

    We Know The Name of the Devil

    Europeans speak in the language of the gods, written in the hand of the gods: math, science, physical law, natural law, and testimony.

    Christianity, Islam, Marxism, Postmodernism, Feminism, Libertarianism and Neoconservatism all bait us into hazard — so do Freudianism, Boasianism, Cultural Marxism, Political Correctness, and Human-Biodiversity-Denialism. They teach us to lie. To Deny the language of the gods, written in the hands of the gods, and our means of transcendence into gods: evolution.

    If you are a devil what do you seek? To prevent man’s transcendence into gods. To deny evolution: the means by which we transcend into gods ourselves.

    If you are a devil what language would you speak? What does our foundational myth of the blacksmith and the devil tell us? The devils bait you into hazard with false promise. False promise of life after death, false promise of freedom from the physical and natural laws and the demands of evolution that transcend man into gods.

    We know the name of the devil. His name was Abraham. He was from Ur.

    4. The Crimes

    5. The Lies

    Supporting Documents

    A Judgement

    ( … )

    1. Judgment

    2. Sentencing

    3. Enforcement: Threats, Charges, and Duties

    4. Letters of Marque 

    . . .

    . . .

    Part 7

    The Introduction to the Reformation And Revolution

    This constitution isn’t just a proposal. It is an offer of the terms of settlement prior to the escalation of hostilities in what will be the bloodiest civil war in human history with consequence that propagate across globe, and alter the course of human history, on a scale not seen since the fall of the roman empire – worse than the world wars.  And as such a proposition for settlement is incomplete and insufficient without the threat of the promise of consequences if mutually tolerable terms are not met.

    1. A Revolution: The Introduction

    The Declaration of Reformation

    The Declaration, mirroring the original Declaration of Independence states the case for reformation of all governments under the existing constitution; the crimes that this government has allowed against our people; the condition of the federal government as one of empire against the interests of the people; the vulnerability of the governments and the empire;  an appeal to accept this constitution on moral grounds; and the threat we make if any resists;

    1. The Declaration

    The Reformation of the Constitution

    The preamble provides an explanation of the human need for political organizations, the development of the european contractual model of political organization; the purpose of a constitution as a means of engineering and operating such organizations; the unequalled success of the constitutional model of engineering and operating polities; the failures of our constitution, our jurists, and our people to adapt to innovations in violations of the Natural Law of the European Peoples; how to correct those failures; The demands of the current condition of our peoples; Our available choices for the correction of the current conditions under that law; The choice we propose; and the amendments to the existing constitution to bring

    1. The Preamble

    The Articles

    1. Article I – Man
    2. Article II – The Law
    3. Article III – Rights and Obligations
      Video: Articles I, II, III.
    4. Article IV – The Court
    5. Article V Section I – The State
    6. Article V Section II – The Military, Regiments, and Militia
    7. Article V Section III – The Treasury
    8. Article V Section IV – The Insurer of Last Resort
    9. Article VI – The Government of the State
    10. Article VII – The Governments of the Several States
    11. Article VIII – The People
    12. Article IX – The Economy
    13. Article X – The Commons
    14. Article XI – Commerce and Cooperation
    15. Article XII – Marriage, Family, Children
    16. Article XIII – Training: Religion, Fitness, Education, Training,
    17. Article XIV – The Territories, Monuments, Arts, and Letters
    18. Article XV – Articles of Devolution

    The Restitutions Upon Necessity of Revolutionary and  Civil War

    1. Article XVI – Restitutions and Punishments

    Single Page, and Printable View:

    The Constitution in a Single DocumentEducation Introductory Videos by John Mark

    1. Reciprocity
    2. The Number One Job of Government
    3. The Constitution – Overview (coming soon… )
    4. Harnessing the Power of Western Civilization
    5. Future Geostrategic Conditions
    6. Civil War 2 – Who Will Win?
    7. Civil War 2 – What Come After?

    Note: The hierarchy of legal terms (Article, Section etc) is as under:

    a) Article b) Section c) Rules d) Regulations. e) Clause

    The Course and Conduct of A Civil War

    —“The purpose of our position on civil war is to remind both sides that the unthinkable is not only thinkable, but possible, if not probable – and that’s why we need to take positive action to resolve our differences. And that we recommend peaceful separation.”— John and Curt

    • Fourth Generation Warfare: End of European Domestication of War
    • Optimum Strategy
    • Strategic Options and Historical Precedents (raid, raid-siege)

    ( … ) https://propertarianinstitute.com/revolution/civil-war/

    An Appeal to the Civilizations of the World

    • Eastern Europe (links to …)
    • Russia
    • India
    • China
    • Africa

    And to Western Peoples:

    • Americans
    • Europeans
    • Canadians
    • Australians and New Zealanders

    . . .

    . . .

  • The Cheat Sheet

    A List of The Core Definitions and Series

    0) |THE WEST| Transcendence (into Gods) > Agency > Heroism + Excellence > Sovereignty + Reciprocity > Truth + Duty > Natural Law + Jury > Contract + Markets in Everything > Optimum Private + Optimum Commons > Optimum Evolutionary Adaptation to Change |*| Vulnerability to deceit.

    Note: “Gods: Those with Agency: Omnicognizance (reason, OmniIndependence (Emotions, biases), Omniscience (knowledge), Omnipotence (Physical), Immortality (time), Others (Law of Sovereignty+Reciprocity). Note that the russian version does not include reciprocity.”

    1) |MARKETS| Expression > Association > Cooperation > Reproduction > Production > Conflict Resolution (law) > Commons > Polities (order) > (War).

    2) |LAW| Transcendence > Sovereignty + Reciprocity (One Law) > Insurer (Court) (King / Judge of last resort) > The Discovered Law > The Referee (Judge) > The Jury -> The Thang -> The Senate -> { the King/Monarchy, the Senate/Lords(oligarchy) And the House (industry) and the Church (families) and the “those who have only the law to defend them – the underclasses”}.

    3 |PROPERTY IN TOTO| : DEMONSTRATED PROPERTY IN TOTO (Demonstrated Property)

    I. Self-Property Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.” ….a) Physical Body ….b) Actions and Time ….c) Memories, Concepts and Identities: tools that enable us to plan and act. In the consumer economy this includes brands. ….d) Status and Class (mate and relation selection, and reputation.)

    II. Personal Property ….a) Several Property: Those things external to our bodies that we claim a monopoly of control over.

    III. Kinship Property ….a) Mates (access to sex/reproduction) ….b) Children (genetics) ….c) Familial Relations (security) ….d) Non-Familial Relations (utility) ….e) Consanguineous property (tribal and family ties)

    IV. Cooperative Property ….a) Organizational ties (work) ….b) Knowledge ties (skills, crafts)

    V. Shareholder Property ….a) Shares: Partnership or shareholdership: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (physical shares in a tradable asset)

    VI. Common Property ….b) Commons: Unrecorded and Unquantified Shareholder Property (shares in commons) ….c) Artificial Property: (property created by fiat agreement) Intellectual Property.

    VII. Common Informal Institutional Property: ….a) Informal (Normative) Property: Our norms: manners, ethics, morals, myths, and rituals that consist of our social portfolio and which make our social order possible.

    VIII. Common Formal Institutional Property ….a) Formal Institutional Property: Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion (including the secular religion), Government, Laws. 4) INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS

    I. Obligations 1) Non-Imposition : (a) Productive, (b) Fully informed, (c) Warrantied, (d) Voluntary Transfer(Exchange) of property-en-toto, (e) Free of External Imposition of Costs against others’ Property-in-toto.

    II. Rights a) Constituo – Homesteading: Convert into property through bearing a cost of transformation. b) Transitus – Transit: passage through 3d space. c) Usus – Use: setting up a stall. d) Fructus – Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits) e) Mancipio – Emancipation: (sale, transfer) f) Abusus – Abuse: (Consumption or Destruction) Opposite of Constituo. 5) CATEGORIES OF DEMONSTRATED INTEREST

    I) Non-Property (Bring under total control) ….CONTROL: Total Control ….PURPOSE: Create Property ….YES: Constituo, Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio, Abusus.

    II) Possession

    III) Consensual Possession

    IV) Normative Possession – “property”

    V) INSTITUTIONAL POSSESSION – “PROPERTY RIGHTS”

    i) Personal (Private) Property (limited control) ….PURPOSE: Acquisition Inventory and Consumption ….YES: Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio, ….MAYBE: Abusus

    ii) Shareholder (Private) Property (very limited control) ….CONTROL: Very Limited Control ….PURPOSE: Dividends from Cooperation ….YES: Fructus ….MAYBE: ?Transitus, ?Usus,?Mancipio, ….NO: Abusus

    iii) Common (Public) Property (All Citizen Shareholders) ….CONTROL: No control. ….PURPOSE: Prohibition on Consumption. ….MAYBE: Transitus, Usus, Fructus, ….NO: Mancipio, Abusus 6) |CRIMES| Predation > Parasitism > Free Riding > Conspiracy > War > Evil.

    I – Predation (Physical)- Criminal Prohibitions. Harm: a. Murder b. Violence (harm, rape, damage, asymmetry of force) c. Theft (asymmetry of control)

    *FREEDOM Achieved Upon Suppression.

    II – Parasitism– Unethical Prohibitions. Fraud (Informational): d. Hazard Production (Baiting, Entrapment), Poisoning the Well (Gossip, Ridicule, Shaming, Rallying, Reputation Destruction, Straw Manning, Heaping of Undue Praise on the undeserving.) e. Fraud (false information) f. Omission (Omitting information) g. Obscurantism (Obscuring information) h. Obstruction (Inhibiting someone else’s transaction)

    *ETHICALITY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    III – Free-Riding (Social)- Immoral Prohibitions. Free Riding (Social): i. Profit without contribution to production. j. Externalization (externalizing costs of any transaction) k. Free Riding (using externalities for self-benefit) l. Socializing Losses (externalization to commons) m. Privatizing Gains (appropriation of commons)

    *MORALITY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    IV – Political Prohibitions. Conspiracy (Political): n. Monopoly, Cartel Seeking (or partial monopoly) o. Rent Seeking (organizational free riding) p. Corruption ( organized rent seeking) q. Conspiracy (organized indirect theft) r. Extortion (Organized direct theft), Blackmail.

    *LIBERTY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    V – War. Military Prohibitions. Warfare (Military): s. Conversion (Propaganda, Religious or normative theft of norms) t. Overbreeding u. Immigration. (dilution of norms, institutions, genes) v. War (organized violence for the purpose of theft) w. Conquest. (reorganization of all property and relations) x. Genocide. (extermination of kin and genetic future)

    *SOVEREIGNTY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    VI – Evil z. The imposition of costs upon the interests of others without intent or incentive for gain, but for the purpose of causing them loss regardless of one’s gain or loss.6 – THE HIERARCHY OF THE LAWS  (Core) VIA NEGATIVA 1. Laws of Nature (Measurement) … Physics … Chemistry … Biology … Ecology … Sentience … Economics

    1. Laws of Action
      … Engineering (?Where?)
      … … ( … ) Applied
    2. Laws of Thought ( Logics )
      … ( … )
      … Neural Economy
    3. Laws of Speech (Grammars)
      … … Logic
      … … Mathematics
      … … … Positional Naming
      … … … Counting
      … … … Arithmetic
      … … … … Accounting
      … … … Geometry
      … … … Calculus
      … … … Statistics
      … … Algorithm
      … … Recipe, Protocol
      … … Testimony
      … … Description
      … … Narration
      … … Fiction
      … … Fictionalisms
      … … … Sophistry, Idealism, Surrealism.
      … … … Spiritual, Occult, Supernatural
      … … … Magical, Supernormal, Pseudo scientific
      … … Deceits
    4. Natural Law (Cooperation)
      … Juridical Law ( Conflict Resolution)
      … … Law of Property (Conflict Avoidance)
      … … Law of Tort (Conflict over Harms)
      … … Law of Contract (Conflict over Trades)
      … Normative Law (…)
      … … Manners, Ethics, Morals,
      … … Strategy (Traditions, Rituals, Myths, Histories)
      … … Institutions formal and informal.
      … Legislation (Commons Production)
      … … Regulation (Prior Restraints)
      … Command ( Deciding the Undecidable )
      … Treaty ( Between insurers of last resort )
      … War ( Beyond the Limits of Cooperation )

    7) |TRUTHFUL GRAMMARS OF EXPRESSION| Math, Logic, Science, Operations(protocols, processes, recipes), Economics (money, banking, finance, accounting), Law (Natural), History(Description, Narration), Literature (including poetry > essay > fiction > mythology).

    8) |DECEITS| failure of due diligence > ignorance > error > bias > wishful thinking > loading > framing > suggestion > obscurantism > fictionalism > denialism > and deceit.

    9) |FICTIONALISMS| Deceit > Sophism > Pseudoscience > Supernaturalism.

    10) |AVOIDANCE| Disapproval > shaming > moralizing > psychologizing > ridicule >rallying > gossiping > undermining > and reputation-destruction. “DSRRGUR”.

    ( Q: James Santagata: What series are you using for This? Because I think you use something shorter and I want to use both short and long versions. I think its GSRM or something like that?)

    11) |ABRAHAMIC GRAMMARS|: Disapproval as substitute for argument > False Promise > Baiting into Hazard > Pilpul (sophism) > Critique () > Heaping of Undue Praise, Straw Man Criticism as a Vehicle for Disapproval > Reputation Destruction > Failure to Supply a Competing alternative capable of surviving same criticisms > Authoritarian Conformity,

    12) |ABRAHAMIC EVOLUTION| Abrahamism > (Adding Platonism) > Judaism > Christianity > Islam > (Dark Age Theology) > Marxism > Postmodernism > Feminism > Denialism: “APMPFD”.

    13) |LONG CYCLE OF HISTORY| {MALE EVOLUTIONARY TERRITORIAL: Fast Western > Medium Rational Eastern > Slow Narrative Indian Indian} vs FEMALE DEVOLUTIONARY MIGRATORY: Supernatural Semitic counter-evolutionary strategy. With Africa, Americas and Pacifica Lagging, and (it appears) Australian-NZ regressing.

    14) |ORDER| Need to Acquire Resources > Action to Improve Acquisition > Cooperation to Improve > Opportunity for Parasitism > Incentive for Parasitism > Preserve incentive to cooperate > Prevent disincentives > Punish to create Disincentives > organize to punish to create disincentives.

    15) SCOPE OF THOUGHT

    Metaphysics:.........Vitruvianism: Man is the measure of all things 
man (cog. sci.)
Psychology:..........Acquisitionism: Man acquires and defends.
Sociology:...........Compatibilism: Intertemporal division of 
perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy wherein we 
combine information and calculate compatible means to the 
achievement of different ends through voluntary conflict, competition,
cooperation, and boycott.
Ethics and Morality:.Propertarianism. (Reciprocity) The Ethics of 
Non Imposition, production, and investment.
Epistemology:........Testimonialism. The competition between imaginary 
associations and existential measurements in all dimensions of 
actionable reality.
The Sciences:........(all of them)
The Law: ............Algorithmic Natural Law. The Natural Law of 
Reciprocity. Strictly constructed from the test of reciprocity.
Politics: ...........Markets in Everything. (Which I call “Market 
Fascism” with tongue in cheek.)
Strategy:............Agency: Maximization of agency through 
Transcendence, Sovereignty, and Heroism
Aesthetics:..........Truth(Testimonial), Excellence(Density), 
Goodness(Morality[‘the commons’]) and Beauty(Bounty).
Mindfulness..........Transcendence: Masculine Stoicism, 
Feminine Epicureanism, Ritual Familialism, Feast Naturalism,
Festival Nationalism.

    15) THE LAW 1) Judges are forced to adjudicate between customary law, regulation, and legislation during a period of rapid social, economic, and political upheaval. In science for example, there is no temporal pressure to decide. In conflict there is temporal pressure to decide. The state has taken on the monopoly of the application of violence, and created a monopoly method of dispute resolution (courts), and created a monopoly body by which to adjudicate such conflicts (law, legislation, and regulation.) 2) There exists only one universal law of human cooperation. We call that law ‘natural law’. That natural law consists in reciprocity. Reciprocity requires satisfaction of the criteria (a) fully informed, (b) productive, (c) warrantied, (d) voluntary transfer, (d) free of imposition of costs upon the interests of others by externality. One can obtain an interest by bearing a cost (performing an improvement) for the purpose of obtaining an interest; and one can have no interest until one has born a cost to obtain such an interest. 3) This one law (reciprocity) provides decidability independent of opinion, preference, custom, or presumption of good, and is the reason international law is governed by reciprocity it is the only rule that provides reciprocal (equal) incentive against retaliation for the imposition of costs upon one another. Law evolved, from the first record, to the present, for the purpose of preserving the volume, velocity, and returns on cooperation, and preventing cooperation’s opposite: retaliation cycles that throughout history have produced the deleterious effects of feuds. 4) Customary Law (especially germanic, if not all european) consists of the discovery and accumulation of applications of this law of reciprocity that we call Tort law. Legislation (command) and regulation (prior constraint) have been given the FORCE of LAW by those whose profit interest – either the population (preservation of returns on cooperation) or the territorial rulers (returns from taxation). 5) The primary function of RULE has been the preservation of cooperation by use of organized violence to suppress impositions of costs upon the investments of others. This is the role of insurer of last resort of Personal Interests. 6) The primary function of GOVERNMENT has been the construction of commons and the extraordinary returns produced by commons, while insuring those commons from privatization of commons, socialization of losses into the commons, by the organized use of violence. This is the role of insurer of last resort of the Commons. 7) The primary function of the STATE, particularly with the advent of paper currency, and now fiat (unbacked) currency (our money consists of nothing but shares in the economy) has increasingly evolved to function as the insurer of last resort against the Hazards of the vicissitudes of nature (disasters, tragedies, accidents, disability, health, old age, and even war). 8) Rights can only exist (a) by reciprocal exchange of the same obligation, and (b) when insured by a third party with sufficient organized violence to insure and reinforce them. Otherwise they are not rights but impositions by means of command. It is correct to say we create a market ‘demand’ natural rights, and we create a market demand for human rights, but those rights do not exist until we organize sufficient violence into roles and institutions to insure those rights: police, sheriffs, soldiery, and judges. 9) Human rights consist of AMBITIONS that we demand from the Governments of States in order to tolerate their retention of a monopoly of control over a territory. They exist as a postwar attempt to constraint governments to improving their territory, people, and assets by market means, without imposition upon their neighbors. Such rights, likewise, do not exist. But are merely an ambition. 10) The universal declaration of human rights contains a few provisions that were necessary to obtain the signatures of the then-communist states, that asserted positive rights (obligations to provide for one another without constraint on the reproduction that exhausts the ability to provide for others, and therefore results in the gradual dysgenic decline as we reverse thousands of years of upward redistribution of reproduction back down to the underclasses who are not able to produce sufficient market goods and services to exist without harming the reproduction of the middle and upper classes.) [note: we have reversed the flynn effect and have, even in china, been losing a third of a point of intelligence over a fairly short number of years. The productivity of a people is reducible to the median of the population’s cost of education and training, such that every point below what is today’s 105 and tomorrow’s 110 places an intolerable burden upon the rest of the polity.] 8) Our American constitution persisted the anglo saxon, germanic, proto-germanic (and possibly proto-indo-european) law of sovereign men limited to acts of reciprocity, and licensed the government to act in their interests to preserve their sovereignty (the original text being ‘life, liberty, property’). Unfortunately at the time the techniques of formal logic, strict constriction from first principles, were not known. We are no longer limited, and there is no reason any and every law cannot be constructed formally from the natural law of reciprocity, producing a complete, consistent, and easily falsifiable body of adjudicatable law. There is no reason any and every act of legislation, and any and every act of regulation, cannot be so constructed. The principle difference under such formal construction is that the one law, discovered application of the one law, regulation to limit hazards of those actions not open to restitution, and CONTRACTS for the production of commons would be consistent, and as such the government could only issue contracts under law, not edicts above that law. (This would destroy the left’s ability to usurp power by democratic means). 9) The uniqueness of western civilization is reducible to (a) a militia that constitutes the shareholders, (b) individual sovereignty of shareholders, (c) the demand for truth, duty, and reciprocity from one another in mutual insurance of our sovereignty. (d) And sovereignty results in the necessity of markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and polities. (e) such markets, adjudicated by the law of tort, adapt to change faster than all other methods of human organization. (f) it is this rapidity of adaptation and resulting insulation from corruption and rent seeking that made the west develop faster than the rest in both the ancient world and the modern, with the Abrahamic Dark Age of the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim attacks on the great civilizations, providing the only hindrance. Once north sea trade was reestablished, the saxon commercial order constructed in europe, and the atlantic opened to the age of sail, the west was finally, by the age of napoleon, able to return to Roman levels of institutional sophistication, and universal imposition of law. [note that the west had fertile lands and forests but no flood river valleys to concentrate production, concentrate people, and develop taxation. So while the ancient world could form armies by taxation, western people had to form militias that relied on advanced (at the time) technology that required whole families to pay for. These militias (cattle raiders, sea peoples, vikings, pirates, european explorers ) organized expeditions (raids) but did so voluntarily. There was no other means of organizing other than contract. It was this order that led to our law, our debate, our reason, and from there our science and technology. Western excellence is due to our law – which elsewhere is not contract but command. 10) The progressives lie to mask what is merely theft – they rely on postmodernism (lying by sophistry), and they rely on marxism (pseudoscience) as well as freudian and boazian pseudoscience. So yes, the Progressives (socialists) lie, but the Conservatives (Aristocratics) cannot tell the truth: The truth is quite simple: the reason for the success of western and eastern civilization, and most obviously the ashkenazim, is the upward redistribution of reproduction, and the use of manorialism, taxation, and the vicissitudes of nature to limit the reproduction of the underclass until such point that surpluses are sufficient to continually increase the standard of living through continuous market competition and innovation. Man was not oppressed. The man self domesticated through the same process he used for plants and animals: breeding the best and culling the rest. This is the dirty secret of civilizations. 11) Sovereignty, Truth, Duty, and Reciprocity produce markets, and markets are eugenic. They are just a peaceful form of eugenics rather than war, enslavement, enserfment. By use of Sovereignty, Truth, Duty, Reciprocity, and Markets western man in the ancient world, and in the modern, dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, infant mortality, early death, 12) The chinese are not so inhibited as we are. they do not care about markets other than in their ability to preserve their racially homogenous polity, and return themselves to position of world power to do so. They are actively researching methods of direct improvement while event their one child policy did not help the ongoing decline in the distribution of intelligence. We are doing the opposite, which is undermining the very reason for our evolutionary success, ad the means by which we dragged mankind out of darkness, and we are doing it through immigration of those very peoples who we have spent thousands of years eliminating from our polities. As far as I know anglicans and ashkenazim remain at parity, but the anglos otherwise have lost a full standard deviation or more since the beginning of the industrial revolution. Even the Norwegians are in distributional decline. 13) The most profitable action any polity can take is to institutionalize benevolent eugenics, and that is to pay the underclasses not to reproduce, and to limit all immigration to skilled professionals, and to push the young and old into the labor force in the less demanding occupations. This is the lesson of our experiment with universal democracy and marxist-postmodernist globalism: dramatic reversal of centuries of civic improvement. At present only the east asians are willing to pay the costs of retaining their accumulated achievements. The eugenicists were right and in retrospect it appears that the Boas, Marx, Freud, Frankfurt, and French Postmodern movements were but reactions against Darwin, Maxwell, Menger, Spencer, and Nietzsche. And the entire postwar period has been nothing but a pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational attack on western civilization – an effort to repeat the destruction of the civilizations of the ancient world by the same means – false promises. This time with pseudoscience and pseudo-rational sophisms using the major media instead of supernatural sophisms using roman roads and greek writing.

  • The Cheat Sheet

    A List of The Core Definitions and Series

    0) |THE WEST| Transcendence (into Gods) > Agency > Heroism + Excellence > Sovereignty + Reciprocity > Truth + Duty > Natural Law + Jury > Contract + Markets in Everything > Optimum Private + Optimum Commons > Optimum Evolutionary Adaptation to Change |*| Vulnerability to deceit.

    Note: “Gods: Those with Agency: Omnicognizance (reason, OmniIndependence (Emotions, biases), Omniscience (knowledge), Omnipotence (Physical), Immortality (time), Others (Law of Sovereignty+Reciprocity). Note that the russian version does not include reciprocity.”

    1) |MARKETS| Expression > Association > Cooperation > Reproduction > Production > Conflict Resolution (law) > Commons > Polities (order) > (War).

    2) |LAW| Transcendence > Sovereignty + Reciprocity (One Law) > Insurer (Court) (King / Judge of last resort) > The Discovered Law > The Referee (Judge) > The Jury -> The Thang -> The Senate -> { the King/Monarchy, the Senate/Lords(oligarchy) And the House (industry) and the Church (families) and the “those who have only the law to defend them – the underclasses”}.

    3 |PROPERTY IN TOTO| : DEMONSTRATED PROPERTY IN TOTO (Demonstrated Property)

    I. Self-Property Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.” ….a) Physical Body ….b) Actions and Time ….c) Memories, Concepts and Identities: tools that enable us to plan and act. In the consumer economy this includes brands. ….d) Status and Class (mate and relation selection, and reputation.)

    II. Personal Property ….a) Several Property: Those things external to our bodies that we claim a monopoly of control over.

    III. Kinship Property ….a) Mates (access to sex/reproduction) ….b) Children (genetics) ….c) Familial Relations (security) ….d) Non-Familial Relations (utility) ….e) Consanguineous property (tribal and family ties)

    IV. Cooperative Property ….a) Organizational ties (work) ….b) Knowledge ties (skills, crafts)

    V. Shareholder Property ….a) Shares: Partnership or shareholdership: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (physical shares in a tradable asset)

    VI. Common Property ….b) Commons: Unrecorded and Unquantified Shareholder Property (shares in commons) ….c) Artificial Property: (property created by fiat agreement) Intellectual Property.

    VII. Common Informal Institutional Property: ….a) Informal (Normative) Property: Our norms: manners, ethics, morals, myths, and rituals that consist of our social portfolio and which make our social order possible.

    VIII. Common Formal Institutional Property ….a) Formal Institutional Property: Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion (including the secular religion), Government, Laws. 4) INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS

    I. Obligations 1) Non-Imposition : (a) Productive, (b) Fully informed, (c) Warrantied, (d) Voluntary Transfer(Exchange) of property-en-toto, (e) Free of External Imposition of Costs against others’ Property-in-toto.

    II. Rights a) Constituo – Homesteading: Convert into property through bearing a cost of transformation. b) Transitus – Transit: passage through 3d space. c) Usus – Use: setting up a stall. d) Fructus – Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits) e) Mancipio – Emancipation: (sale, transfer) f) Abusus – Abuse: (Consumption or Destruction) Opposite of Constituo. 5) CATEGORIES OF DEMONSTRATED INTEREST

    I) Non-Property (Bring under total control) ….CONTROL: Total Control ….PURPOSE: Create Property ….YES: Constituo, Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio, Abusus.

    II) Possession

    III) Consensual Possession

    IV) Normative Possession – “property”

    V) INSTITUTIONAL POSSESSION – “PROPERTY RIGHTS”

    i) Personal (Private) Property (limited control) ….PURPOSE: Acquisition Inventory and Consumption ….YES: Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio, ….MAYBE: Abusus

    ii) Shareholder (Private) Property (very limited control) ….CONTROL: Very Limited Control ….PURPOSE: Dividends from Cooperation ….YES: Fructus ….MAYBE: ?Transitus, ?Usus,?Mancipio, ….NO: Abusus

    iii) Common (Public) Property (All Citizen Shareholders) ….CONTROL: No control. ….PURPOSE: Prohibition on Consumption. ….MAYBE: Transitus, Usus, Fructus, ….NO: Mancipio, Abusus 6) |CRIMES| Predation > Parasitism > Free Riding > Conspiracy > War > Evil.

    I – Predation (Physical)- Criminal Prohibitions. Harm: a. Murder b. Violence (harm, rape, damage, asymmetry of force) c. Theft (asymmetry of control)

    *FREEDOM Achieved Upon Suppression.

    II – Parasitism– Unethical Prohibitions. Fraud (Informational): d. Hazard Production (Baiting, Entrapment), Poisoning the Well (Gossip, Ridicule, Shaming, Rallying, Reputation Destruction, Straw Manning, Heaping of Undue Praise on the undeserving.) e. Fraud (false information) f. Omission (Omitting information) g. Obscurantism (Obscuring information) h. Obstruction (Inhibiting someone else’s transaction)

    *ETHICALITY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    III – Free-Riding (Social)- Immoral Prohibitions. Free Riding (Social): i. Profit without contribution to production. j. Externalization (externalizing costs of any transaction) k. Free Riding (using externalities for self-benefit) l. Socializing Losses (externalization to commons) m. Privatizing Gains (appropriation of commons)

    *MORALITY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    IV – Political Prohibitions. Conspiracy (Political): n. Monopoly, Cartel Seeking (or partial monopoly) o. Rent Seeking (organizational free riding) p. Corruption ( organized rent seeking) q. Conspiracy (organized indirect theft) r. Extortion (Organized direct theft), Blackmail.

    *LIBERTY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    V – War. Military Prohibitions. Warfare (Military): s. Conversion (Propaganda, Religious or normative theft of norms) t. Overbreeding u. Immigration. (dilution of norms, institutions, genes) v. War (organized violence for the purpose of theft) w. Conquest. (reorganization of all property and relations) x. Genocide. (extermination of kin and genetic future)

    *SOVEREIGNTY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    VI – Evil z. The imposition of costs upon the interests of others without intent or incentive for gain, but for the purpose of causing them loss regardless of one’s gain or loss.6 – THE HIERARCHY OF THE LAWS  (Core) VIA NEGATIVA 1. Laws of Nature (Measurement) … Physics … Chemistry … Biology … Ecology … Sentience … Economics

    1. Laws of Action
      … Engineering (?Where?)
      … … ( … ) Applied
    2. Laws of Thought ( Logics )
      … ( … )
      … Neural Economy
    3. Laws of Speech (Grammars)
      … … Logic
      … … Mathematics
      … … … Positional Naming
      … … … Counting
      … … … Arithmetic
      … … … … Accounting
      … … … Geometry
      … … … Calculus
      … … … Statistics
      … … Algorithm
      … … Recipe, Protocol
      … … Testimony
      … … Description
      … … Narration
      … … Fiction
      … … Fictionalisms
      … … … Sophistry, Idealism, Surrealism.
      … … … Spiritual, Occult, Supernatural
      … … … Magical, Supernormal, Pseudo scientific
      … … Deceits
    4. Natural Law (Cooperation)
      … Juridical Law ( Conflict Resolution)
      … … Law of Property (Conflict Avoidance)
      … … Law of Tort (Conflict over Harms)
      … … Law of Contract (Conflict over Trades)
      … Normative Law (…)
      … … Manners, Ethics, Morals,
      … … Strategy (Traditions, Rituals, Myths, Histories)
      … … Institutions formal and informal.
      … Legislation (Commons Production)
      … … Regulation (Prior Restraints)
      … Command ( Deciding the Undecidable )
      … Treaty ( Between insurers of last resort )
      … War ( Beyond the Limits of Cooperation )

    7) |TRUTHFUL GRAMMARS OF EXPRESSION| Math, Logic, Science, Operations(protocols, processes, recipes), Economics (money, banking, finance, accounting), Law (Natural), History(Description, Narration), Literature (including poetry > essay > fiction > mythology).

    8) |DECEITS| failure of due diligence > ignorance > error > bias > wishful thinking > loading > framing > suggestion > obscurantism > fictionalism > denialism > and deceit.

    9) |FICTIONALISMS| Deceit > Sophism > Pseudoscience > Supernaturalism.

    10) |AVOIDANCE| Disapproval > shaming > moralizing > psychologizing > ridicule >rallying > gossiping > undermining > and reputation-destruction. “DSRRGUR”.

    ( Q: James Santagata: What series are you using for This? Because I think you use something shorter and I want to use both short and long versions. I think its GSRM or something like that?)

    11) |ABRAHAMIC GRAMMARS|: Disapproval as substitute for argument > False Promise > Baiting into Hazard > Pilpul (sophism) > Critique () > Heaping of Undue Praise, Straw Man Criticism as a Vehicle for Disapproval > Reputation Destruction > Failure to Supply a Competing alternative capable of surviving same criticisms > Authoritarian Conformity,

    12) |ABRAHAMIC EVOLUTION| Abrahamism > (Adding Platonism) > Judaism > Christianity > Islam > (Dark Age Theology) > Marxism > Postmodernism > Feminism > Denialism: “APMPFD”.

    13) |LONG CYCLE OF HISTORY| {MALE EVOLUTIONARY TERRITORIAL: Fast Western > Medium Rational Eastern > Slow Narrative Indian Indian} vs FEMALE DEVOLUTIONARY MIGRATORY: Supernatural Semitic counter-evolutionary strategy. With Africa, Americas and Pacifica Lagging, and (it appears) Australian-NZ regressing.

    14) |ORDER| Need to Acquire Resources > Action to Improve Acquisition > Cooperation to Improve > Opportunity for Parasitism > Incentive for Parasitism > Preserve incentive to cooperate > Prevent disincentives > Punish to create Disincentives > organize to punish to create disincentives.

    15) SCOPE OF THOUGHT

    Metaphysics:.........Vitruvianism: Man is the measure of all things 
man (cog. sci.)
Psychology:..........Acquisitionism: Man acquires and defends.
Sociology:...........Compatibilism: Intertemporal division of 
perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy wherein we 
combine information and calculate compatible means to the 
achievement of different ends through voluntary conflict, competition,
cooperation, and boycott.
Ethics and Morality:.Propertarianism. (Reciprocity) The Ethics of 
Non Imposition, production, and investment.
Epistemology:........Testimonialism. The competition between imaginary 
associations and existential measurements in all dimensions of 
actionable reality.
The Sciences:........(all of them)
The Law: ............Algorithmic Natural Law. The Natural Law of 
Reciprocity. Strictly constructed from the test of reciprocity.
Politics: ...........Markets in Everything. (Which I call “Market 
Fascism” with tongue in cheek.)
Strategy:............Agency: Maximization of agency through 
Transcendence, Sovereignty, and Heroism
Aesthetics:..........Truth(Testimonial), Excellence(Density), 
Goodness(Morality[‘the commons’]) and Beauty(Bounty).
Mindfulness..........Transcendence: Masculine Stoicism, 
Feminine Epicureanism, Ritual Familialism, Feast Naturalism,
Festival Nationalism.

    15) THE LAW 1) Judges are forced to adjudicate between customary law, regulation, and legislation during a period of rapid social, economic, and political upheaval. In science for example, there is no temporal pressure to decide. In conflict there is temporal pressure to decide. The state has taken on the monopoly of the application of violence, and created a monopoly method of dispute resolution (courts), and created a monopoly body by which to adjudicate such conflicts (law, legislation, and regulation.) 2) There exists only one universal law of human cooperation. We call that law ‘natural law’. That natural law consists in reciprocity. Reciprocity requires satisfaction of the criteria (a) fully informed, (b) productive, (c) warrantied, (d) voluntary transfer, (d) free of imposition of costs upon the interests of others by externality. One can obtain an interest by bearing a cost (performing an improvement) for the purpose of obtaining an interest; and one can have no interest until one has born a cost to obtain such an interest. 3) This one law (reciprocity) provides decidability independent of opinion, preference, custom, or presumption of good, and is the reason international law is governed by reciprocity it is the only rule that provides reciprocal (equal) incentive against retaliation for the imposition of costs upon one another. Law evolved, from the first record, to the present, for the purpose of preserving the volume, velocity, and returns on cooperation, and preventing cooperation’s opposite: retaliation cycles that throughout history have produced the deleterious effects of feuds. 4) Customary Law (especially germanic, if not all european) consists of the discovery and accumulation of applications of this law of reciprocity that we call Tort law. Legislation (command) and regulation (prior constraint) have been given the FORCE of LAW by those whose profit interest – either the population (preservation of returns on cooperation) or the territorial rulers (returns from taxation). 5) The primary function of RULE has been the preservation of cooperation by use of organized violence to suppress impositions of costs upon the investments of others. This is the role of insurer of last resort of Personal Interests. 6) The primary function of GOVERNMENT has been the construction of commons and the extraordinary returns produced by commons, while insuring those commons from privatization of commons, socialization of losses into the commons, by the organized use of violence. This is the role of insurer of last resort of the Commons. 7) The primary function of the STATE, particularly with the advent of paper currency, and now fiat (unbacked) currency (our money consists of nothing but shares in the economy) has increasingly evolved to function as the insurer of last resort against the Hazards of the vicissitudes of nature (disasters, tragedies, accidents, disability, health, old age, and even war). 8) Rights can only exist (a) by reciprocal exchange of the same obligation, and (b) when insured by a third party with sufficient organized violence to insure and reinforce them. Otherwise they are not rights but impositions by means of command. It is correct to say we create a market ‘demand’ natural rights, and we create a market demand for human rights, but those rights do not exist until we organize sufficient violence into roles and institutions to insure those rights: police, sheriffs, soldiery, and judges. 9) Human rights consist of AMBITIONS that we demand from the Governments of States in order to tolerate their retention of a monopoly of control over a territory. They exist as a postwar attempt to constraint governments to improving their territory, people, and assets by market means, without imposition upon their neighbors. Such rights, likewise, do not exist. But are merely an ambition. 10) The universal declaration of human rights contains a few provisions that were necessary to obtain the signatures of the then-communist states, that asserted positive rights (obligations to provide for one another without constraint on the reproduction that exhausts the ability to provide for others, and therefore results in the gradual dysgenic decline as we reverse thousands of years of upward redistribution of reproduction back down to the underclasses who are not able to produce sufficient market goods and services to exist without harming the reproduction of the middle and upper classes.) [note: we have reversed the flynn effect and have, even in china, been losing a third of a point of intelligence over a fairly short number of years. The productivity of a people is reducible to the median of the population’s cost of education and training, such that every point below what is today’s 105 and tomorrow’s 110 places an intolerable burden upon the rest of the polity.] 8) Our American constitution persisted the anglo saxon, germanic, proto-germanic (and possibly proto-indo-european) law of sovereign men limited to acts of reciprocity, and licensed the government to act in their interests to preserve their sovereignty (the original text being ‘life, liberty, property’). Unfortunately at the time the techniques of formal logic, strict constriction from first principles, were not known. We are no longer limited, and there is no reason any and every law cannot be constructed formally from the natural law of reciprocity, producing a complete, consistent, and easily falsifiable body of adjudicatable law. There is no reason any and every act of legislation, and any and every act of regulation, cannot be so constructed. The principle difference under such formal construction is that the one law, discovered application of the one law, regulation to limit hazards of those actions not open to restitution, and CONTRACTS for the production of commons would be consistent, and as such the government could only issue contracts under law, not edicts above that law. (This would destroy the left’s ability to usurp power by democratic means). 9) The uniqueness of western civilization is reducible to (a) a militia that constitutes the shareholders, (b) individual sovereignty of shareholders, (c) the demand for truth, duty, and reciprocity from one another in mutual insurance of our sovereignty. (d) And sovereignty results in the necessity of markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and polities. (e) such markets, adjudicated by the law of tort, adapt to change faster than all other methods of human organization. (f) it is this rapidity of adaptation and resulting insulation from corruption and rent seeking that made the west develop faster than the rest in both the ancient world and the modern, with the Abrahamic Dark Age of the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim attacks on the great civilizations, providing the only hindrance. Once north sea trade was reestablished, the saxon commercial order constructed in europe, and the atlantic opened to the age of sail, the west was finally, by the age of napoleon, able to return to Roman levels of institutional sophistication, and universal imposition of law. [note that the west had fertile lands and forests but no flood river valleys to concentrate production, concentrate people, and develop taxation. So while the ancient world could form armies by taxation, western people had to form militias that relied on advanced (at the time) technology that required whole families to pay for. These militias (cattle raiders, sea peoples, vikings, pirates, european explorers ) organized expeditions (raids) but did so voluntarily. There was no other means of organizing other than contract. It was this order that led to our law, our debate, our reason, and from there our science and technology. Western excellence is due to our law – which elsewhere is not contract but command. 10) The progressives lie to mask what is merely theft – they rely on postmodernism (lying by sophistry), and they rely on marxism (pseudoscience) as well as freudian and boazian pseudoscience. So yes, the Progressives (socialists) lie, but the Conservatives (Aristocratics) cannot tell the truth: The truth is quite simple: the reason for the success of western and eastern civilization, and most obviously the ashkenazim, is the upward redistribution of reproduction, and the use of manorialism, taxation, and the vicissitudes of nature to limit the reproduction of the underclass until such point that surpluses are sufficient to continually increase the standard of living through continuous market competition and innovation. Man was not oppressed. The man self domesticated through the same process he used for plants and animals: breeding the best and culling the rest. This is the dirty secret of civilizations. 11) Sovereignty, Truth, Duty, and Reciprocity produce markets, and markets are eugenic. They are just a peaceful form of eugenics rather than war, enslavement, enserfment. By use of Sovereignty, Truth, Duty, Reciprocity, and Markets western man in the ancient world, and in the modern, dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, infant mortality, early death, 12) The chinese are not so inhibited as we are. they do not care about markets other than in their ability to preserve their racially homogenous polity, and return themselves to position of world power to do so. They are actively researching methods of direct improvement while event their one child policy did not help the ongoing decline in the distribution of intelligence. We are doing the opposite, which is undermining the very reason for our evolutionary success, ad the means by which we dragged mankind out of darkness, and we are doing it through immigration of those very peoples who we have spent thousands of years eliminating from our polities. As far as I know anglicans and ashkenazim remain at parity, but the anglos otherwise have lost a full standard deviation or more since the beginning of the industrial revolution. Even the Norwegians are in distributional decline. 13) The most profitable action any polity can take is to institutionalize benevolent eugenics, and that is to pay the underclasses not to reproduce, and to limit all immigration to skilled professionals, and to push the young and old into the labor force in the less demanding occupations. This is the lesson of our experiment with universal democracy and marxist-postmodernist globalism: dramatic reversal of centuries of civic improvement. At present only the east asians are willing to pay the costs of retaining their accumulated achievements. The eugenicists were right and in retrospect it appears that the Boas, Marx, Freud, Frankfurt, and French Postmodern movements were but reactions against Darwin, Maxwell, Menger, Spencer, and Nietzsche. And the entire postwar period has been nothing but a pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational attack on western civilization – an effort to repeat the destruction of the civilizations of the ancient world by the same means – false promises. This time with pseudoscience and pseudo-rational sophisms using the major media instead of supernatural sophisms using roman roads and greek writing.

  • SECOND BIT OF CLARITY FOR THE DAY: DIMENSIONS OF DUE DILIGENCE Dimensions of Nec

    SECOND BIT OF CLARITY FOR THE DAY: DIMENSIONS OF DUE DILIGENCE

    Dimensions of Necessary Warranty of Due Diligence:

    + 0 identity

    + 1 internal consistency (logical) (verbal)

    + 2 external correspondence (empirical) (existential)

    + 3 existential possibility (operational) (actionable)

    + 4 rational choice (voluntary and rational) (choice)

    + 5 reciprocity (reciprocally voluntary and rational)(morality)

    —–

    + limits, full accounting, and parsimony (complete)

    —–

    = Coherence (complete consistency)

    (a) I sometimes don’t separate out rational choice and reciprocity and simply use Morality for the combination.

    (b) I sometimes don’t enumerate limits, full accounting, and parsimony, but just use full accounting.

    (c) I sometimes don’t mention coherence because it only seems to confuse people that it’s the consistency across all of the dimensions

    (d )All of these are simply tests of consistency within or across (coherence) dimensions that it is possible for man to test.

    (e) Limits, Full Accounting, Parsimony, are tests of every individual dimension The rest of the tests, only the given dimension.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 13:03:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM CHEAT SHEET (The Cheat Sheet Version of Propertarianism) 0) |THE

    PROPERTARIANISM CHEAT SHEET

    (The Cheat Sheet Version of Propertarianism)

    0) |THE WEST| Transcendence (into Gods) > Agency + (?) > Sovereignty + Reciprocity > Truth + Duty > Natural Law + Jury > Contract + Markets in Everything > Optimum Private + Optimum Commons > Optimum Evolutionary Adaptation to Change |*| Vulnerability to deceit.

    Note: “Gods: Those with Agency: Omnicognizance (reason, OmniIndependence (Emotions, biases), Omniscience (knowledge), Omnipotence (Physical), Immortality (time), Others (Law of Sovereignty+Reciprocity). Note that the russian version does not include reciprocity.”

    1) |MARKETS| Expression > Association > Cooperation > Reproduction > Production > Conflict Resolution (law) > Commons > Polities (order) > (War).

    2) |LAW| Transcendence > Sovereignty + Reciprocity (One Law) > Insurer (Court) (King / Judge of last resort) > The Discovered Law > The Referee (Judge) > The Jury -> The Thang -> The Senate -> { the King/Monarchy, the Senate/Lords(oligarchy) And the House (industry) and the Church (families) and the “those who have only the law to defend them – the underclasses”}.

    3 |PROPERTY IN TOTO| : DEMONSTRATED PROPERTY IN TOTO (Demonstrated Property)

    I. SELF-PROPERTY

    Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.”

    ….a) Physical Body

    ….b) Actions and Time

    ….c) Memories, Concepts and Identities: tools that enable us to plan and act. In the consumer economy this includes brands.

    ….d) Status and Class (mate and relation selection, and reputation.)

    II. PERSONAL PROPERTY

    ….a) Several Property: Those things external to our bodies that we claim a monopoly of control over.

    III. KINSHIP PROPERTY

    ….a) Mates (access to sex/reproduction)

    ….b) Children (genetics)

    ….c) Familial Relations (security)

    ….d) Non-Familial Relations (utility)

    ….e) Consanguineous property (tribal and family ties)

    IV. COOPERATIVE PROPERTY

    ….a) Organizational ties (work)

    ….b) Knowledge ties (skills, crafts)

    V. SHAREHOLDER PROPERTY

    ….a) Shares: Partnership or shareholdership: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (physical shares in a tradable asset)

    VI. COMMON PROPERTY

    ….b) Commons: Unrecorded and Unquantified Shareholder Property (shares in commons)

    ….c) Artificial Property: (property created by fiat agreement) Intellectual Property.

    VII. COMMON INFORMAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY:

    ….a) Informal (Normative) Property: Our norms: manners, ethics, morals, myths, and rituals that consist of our social portfolio and which make our social order possible.

    VIII. COMMON FORMAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY

    ….a) Formal Institutional Property: Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion (including the secular religion), Government, Laws.

    4) INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS

    I. OBLIGATIONS

    1) Non-Imposition :

    (a) Productive,

    (b) Fully informed,

    (c) Warrantied,

    (d) Voluntary Transfer(Exchange) of property-en-toto,

    (e) Free of External Imposition of Costs against others’ Property-in-toto.

    II. RIGHTS

    a) Constituo – Homesteading: Convert into property through bearing a cost of transformation.

    b) Transitus – Transit: passage through 3d space.

    c) Usus – Use: setting up a stall.

    d) Fructus – Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits)

    e) Mancipio – Emancipation: (sale, transfer)

    f) Abusus – Abuse: (Consumption or Destruction) Opposite of Constituo.

    5) CATEGORIES OF PROPERTY

    I) Non-Property (Bring under total control)

    ….CONTROL: Total Control

    ….PURPOSE: Create Property

    ….YES: Constituo, Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio, Abusus.

    II) Possession

    III) Consensual Possession

    IV) Normative Possession – “property”

    V) INSTITUTIONAL POSSESSION – “PROPERTY RIGHTS”

    i) Personal (Private) Property (limited control)

    ….PURPOSE: Acquisition Inventory and Consumption

    ….YES: Transitus, Usus, Fructus, Mancipio,

    ….MAYBE: Abusus

    ii) Shareholder (Private) Property (very limited control)

    ….CONTROL: Very Limited Control

    ….PURPOSE: Dividends from Cooperation

    ….YES: Fructus

    ….MAYBE: ?Transitus, ?Usus,?Mancipio,

    ….NO: Abusus

    iii) Common (Public) Property (All Citizen Shareholders)

    ….CONTROL: No control.

    ….PURPOSE: Prohibition on Consumption.

    ….MAYBE: Transitus, Usus, Fructus,

    ….NO: Mancipio, Abusus

    6) |CRIMES| Predation > Parasitism > Free Riding > Conspiracy > War > Evil.

    I – Predation (Physical)-

    Criminal Prohibitions.

    Harm:

    a. Murder

    b. Violence (harm, rape, damage, asymmetry of force)

    c. Theft (asymmetry of control)

    *FREEDOM Achieved Upon Suppression.

    II – Parasitism-

    Unethical Prohibitions.

    Fraud (Informational):

    d. Hazard Production (Baiting, Entrapment), Poisoning the Well (Gossip, Ridicule, Shaming, Rallying, Reputation Destruction, Straw Manning, Heaping of Undue Praise on the undeserving.)

    e. Fraud (false information)

    f. Omission (Omitting information)

    g. Obscurantism (Obscuring information)

    h. Obstruction (Inhibiting someone else’s transaction)

    *ETHICALITY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    III – Free-Riding (Social)-

    Immoral Prohibitions.

    Free Riding (Social):

    i. Profit without contribution to production.

    j. Externalization (externalizing costs of any transaction)

    k. Free Riding (using externalities for self-benefit)

    l. Socializing Losses (externalization to commons)

    m. Privatizing Gains (appropriation of commons)

    *MORALITY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    IV – Political Prohibitions.

    Conspiracy (Political):

    n. Monopoly, Cartel Seeking (or partial monopoly)

    o. Rent Seeking (organizational free riding)

    p. Corruption ( organized rent seeking)

    q. Conspiracy (organized indirect theft)

    r. Extortion (Organized direct theft), Blackmail.

    *LIBERTY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    V – War.

    Military Prohibitions.

    Warfare (Military):

    s. Conversion (Propaganda, Religious or normative theft of norms)

    t. Overbreeding

    u. Immigration. (dilution of norms, institutions, genes)

    v. War (organized violence for the purpose of theft)

    w. Conquest. (reorganization of all property and relations)

    x. Genocide. (extermination of kin and genetic future)

    *SOVEREIGNTY Achieved Upon Suppression.

    VI – Evil

    z. The imposition of costs upon the interests of others without intent or incentive for gain, but for the purpose of causing them loss regardless of one’s gain or loss.

    7) |TRUTHFUL GRAMMARS OF EXPRESSION| Math, Logic, Science, Operations(protocols, processes, recipes), Economics (money, banking, finance, accounting), Law (Natural), History, Literature (including poetry > essay > fiction > mythology).

    8) |DECEITS| failure of due diligence > ignorance > error > bias > wishful thinking > loading > framing > suggestion > obscurantism > fictionalism > denialism > and deceit.

    9) |FICTIONALISMS| Deceit > Sophism > Pseudoscience > Supernaturalism.

    10) |AVOIDANCE| Disapproval > shaming > moralizing > psychologizing > ridicule >rallying > gossiping > undermining > and reputation-destruction. “DSRRGUR”.

    ( Q: James Santagata: What series are you using for This? Because I think you use something shorter and I want to use both short and long versions. I think its GSRM or something like that?)

    11) |ABRAHAMIC GRAMMARS|: Disapproval as substitute for argument > False Promise > Pilpul (sophism) > Critique () > Heaping of Undue Praise, Straw Man Criticism as a Vehicle for Disapproval > Reputation Destruction > Failure to Supply a Competing alternative capable of surviving same criticisms > Authoritarian Conformity,

    12) |ABRAHAMIC EVOLUTION| Abrahamism > (Adding Platonism) > Judaism > Christianity > Islam > (Dark Age Theology) > Marxism > Postmodernism > Feminism > Denialism: “APMPFD”.

    13) |LONG CYCLE OF HISTORY| {MALE EVOLUTIONARY TERRITORIAL: Fast Western > Medium Rational Eastern > Slow Narrative Indian Indian} vs FEMALE DEVOLUTIONARY MIGRATORY: Supernatural Semitic counter-evolutionary strategy. With Africa, Americas and Pacifica Lagging, and (it appears) Australian-NZ regressing.

    14) |ORDER| Need to Acquire Resources > Action to Improve Acquisition > Cooperation to Improve > Opportunity for Parasitism > Incentive for Parasitism > Preserve incentive to cooperate > Prevent disincentives > Punish to create Disincentives > organize to punish to create disincentives.

    THE LAW

    1) Judges are forced to adjudicate between customary law, regulation, and legislation during a period of rapid social, economic, and political upheaval. In science for example, there is no temporal pressure to decide. In conflict there is temporal pressure to decide. The state has taken on the monopoly of the application of violence, and created a monopoly method of dispute resolution (courts), and created a monopoly body by which to adjudicate such conflicts (law, legislation, and regulation.)

    2) There exists only one universal law of human cooperation. We call that law ‘natural law’. That natural law consists in reciprocity. Reciprocity requires satisfaction of the criteria (a) fully informed, (b) productive, (c) warrantied, (d) voluntary transfer, (d) free of imposition of costs upon the interests of others by externality. One can obtain an interest by bearing a cost (performing an improvement) for the purpose of obtaining an interest; and one can have no interest until one has born a cost to obtain such an interest.

    3) This one law (reciprocity) provides decidability independent of opinion, preference, custom, or presumption of good, and is the reason international law is governed by reciprocity it is the only rule that provides reciprocal (equal) incentive against retaliation for the imposition of costs upon one another. Law evolved, from the first record, to the present, for the purpose of preserving the volume, velocity, and returns on cooperation, and preventing cooperation’s opposite: retaliation cycles that throughout history have produced the deleterious effects of feuds.

    4) Customary Law (especially germanic, if not all european) consists of the discovery and accumulation of applications of this law of reciprocity that we call Tort law. Legislation (command) and regulation (prior constraint) have been given the FORCE of LAW by those whose profit interest – either the population (preservation of returns on cooperation) or the territorial rulers (returns from taxation).

    5) The primary function of RULE has been the preservation of cooperation by use of organized violence to suppress impositions of costs upon the investments of others. This is the role of insurer of last resort of Personal Interests.

    6) The primary function of GOVERNMENT has been the construction of commons and the extraordinary returns produced by commons, while insuring those commons from privatization of commons, socialization of losses into the commons, by the organized use of violence. This is the role of insurer of last resort of the Commons.

    7) The primary function of the STATE, particularly with the advent of paper currency, and now fiat (unbacked) currency (our money consists of nothing but shares in the economy) has increasingly evolved to function as the insurer of last resort against the Hazards of the vicissitudes of nature (disasters, tragedies, accidents, disability, health, old age, and even war).

    8) Rights can only exist (a) by reciprocal exchange of the same obligation, and (b) when insured by a third party with sufficient organized violence to insure and reinforce them. Otherwise they are not rights but impositions by means of command. It is correct to say we create a market ‘demand’ natural rights, and we create a market demand for human rights, but those rights do not exist until we organize sufficient violence into roles and institutions to insure those rights: police, sheriffs, soldiery, and judges.

    9) Human rights consist of AMBITIONS that we demand from the Governments of States in order to tolerate their retention of a monopoly of control over a territory. They exist as a postwar attempt to constraint governments to improving their territory, people, and assets by market means, without imposition upon their neighbors. Such rights, likewise, do not exist. But are merely an ambition.

    10) The universal declaration of human rights contains a few provisions that were necessary to obtain the signatures of the then-communist states, that asserted positive rights (obligations to provide for one another without constraint on the reproduction that exhausts the ability to provide for others, and therefore results in the gradual dysgenic decline as we reverse thousands of years of upward redistribution of reproduction back down to the underclasses who are not able to produce sufficient market goods and services to exist without harming the reproduction of the middle and upper classes.) [note: we have reversed the flynn effect and have, even in china, been losing a third of a point of intelligence over a fairly short number of years. The productivity of a people is reducible to the median of the population’s cost of education and training, such that every point below what is today’s 105 and tomorrow’s 110 places an intolerable burden upon the rest of the polity.]

    8) Our American constitution persisted the anglo saxon, germanic, proto-germanic (and possibly proto-indo-european) law of sovereign men limited to acts of reciprocity, and licensed the government to act in their interests to preserve their sovereignty (the original text being ‘life, liberty, property’). Unfortunately at the time the techniques of formal logic, strict constriction from first principles, were not known. We are no longer limited, and there is no reason any and every law cannot be constructed formally from the natural law of reciprocity, producing a complete, consistent, and easily falsifiable body of adjudicatable law. There is no reason any and every act of legislation, and any and every act of regulation, cannot be so constructed. The principle difference under such formal construction is that the one law, discovered application of the one law, regulation to limit hazards of those actions not open to restitution, and CONTRACTS for the production of commons would be consistent, and as such the government could only issue contracts under law, not edicts above that law. (This would destroy the left’s ability to usurp power by democratic means).

    9) The uniqueness of western civilization is reducible to (a) a militia that constitutes the shareholders, (b) individual sovereignty of shareholders, (c) the demand for truth, duty, and reciprocity from one another in mutual insurance of our sovereignty. (d) And sovereignty results in the necessity of markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and polities. (e) such markets, adjudicated by the law of tort, adapt to change faster than all other methods of human organization. (f) it is this rapidity of adaptation and resulting insulation from corruption and rent seeking that made the west develop faster than the rest in both the ancient world and the modern, with the Abrahamic Dark Age of the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim attacks on the great civilizations, providing the only hindrance. Once north sea trade was reestablished, the saxon commercial order constructed in europe, and the atlantic opened to the age of sail, the west was finally, by the age of napoleon, able to return to Roman levels of institutional sophistication, and universal imposition of law. [note that the west had fertile lands and forests but no flood river valleys to concentrate production, concentrate people, and develop taxation. So while the ancient world could form armies by taxation, western people had to form militias that relied on advanced (at the time) technology that required whole families to pay for. These militias (cattle raiders, sea peoples, vikings, pirates, european explorers ) organized expeditions (raids) but did so voluntarily. There was no other means of organizing other than contract. It was this order that led to our law, our debate, our reason, and from there our science and technology. Western excellence is due to our law – which elsewhere is not contract but command.

    10) The progressives lie to mask what is merely theft – they rely on postmodernism (lying by sophistry), and they rely on marxism (pseudoscience) as well as freudian and boazian pseudoscience. So yes, the Progressives (socialists) lie, but the Conservatives (Aristocratics) cannot tell the truth: The truth is quite simple: the reason for the success of western and eastern civilization, and most obviously the ashkenazim, is the upward redistribution of reproduction, and the use of manorialism, taxation, and the vicissitudes of nature to limit the reproduction of the underclass until such point that surpluses are sufficient to continually increase the standard of living through continuous market competition and innovation. Man was not oppressed. The man self domesticated through the same process he used for plants and animals: breeding the best and culling the rest. This is the dirty secret of civilizations.

    11) Sovereignty, Truth, Duty, and Reciprocity produce markets, and markets are eugenic. They are just a peaceful form of eugenics rather than war, enslavement, enserfment. By use of Sovereignty, Truth, Duty, Reciprocity, and Markets western man in the ancient world, and in the modern, dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, infant mortality, early death,

    12) The chinese are not so inhibited as we are. they do not care about markets other than in their ability to preserve their racially homogenous polity, and return themselves to position of world power to do so. They are actively researching methods of direct improvement while event their one child policy did not help the ongoing decline in the distribution of intelligence. We are doing the opposite, which is undermining the very reason for our evolutionary success, ad the means by which we dragged mankind out of darkness, and we are doing it through immigration of those very peoples who we have spent thousands of years eliminating from our polities. As far as I know anglicans and ashkenazim remain at parity, but the anglos otherwise have lost a full standard deviation or more since the beginning of the industrial revolution. Even the Norwegians are in distributional decline.

    13) The most profitable action any polity can take is to institutionalize benevolent eugenics, and that is to pay the underclasses not to reproduce, and to limit all immigration to skilled professionals, and to push the young and old into the labor force in the less demanding occupations. This is the lesson of our experiment with universal democracy and marxist-postmodernist globalism: dramatic reversal of centuries of civic improvement. At present only the east asians are willing to pay the costs of retaining their accumulated achievements. The eugenicists were right and in retrospect it appears that the Boas, Marx, Freud, Frankfurt, and French Postmodern movements were but reactions against Darwin, Maxwell, Menger, Spencer, and Nietzsche. And the entire postwar period has been nothing but a pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational attack on western civilization – an effort to repeat the destruction of the civilizations of the ancient world by the same means – false promises. This time with pseudoscience and pseudo-rational sophisms using the major media instead of supernatural sophisms using roman roads and greek writing.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-13 09:53:00 UTC

  • BOOK LIST (IN ORDER) – PROPERTARIAN INSTITUTE COURSE IN WAR Victor Davis Hanson:

    BOOK LIST (IN ORDER) – PROPERTARIAN INSTITUTE COURSE IN WAR

    Victor Davis Hanson:

    – The Other Greeks – The Family Farm and the Agrarian Roots of Western Civilization.

    – The Western Way of War – Infantry Battle in Classical Greece

    – Why the West Has Won : Carnage and Culture

    John Keegan:

    – A History Of Warfare

    Martin Van Creveld:

    – The Culture of War

    – The Rise and Decline of the State

    – Pussycats – Why the Rest Keeps Beating the West

    – The Transformation of War: The Most Radical Reinterpretation of Armed Conflict Since Clausewitz

    William S Lind:

    – 4th Generation Warfare Handbook

    Various

    – Revolutionary, Insurrectionist, War of man against man.

    Martin Van Creveld:

    – A History of Strategy: From Sun Tzu to William S. Lind

    Curt Doolittle

    – (Essay) Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, Prussianism, and The Militia – Why strategy must be taught as a balance to morality. Why the Church (child), Academy (Youth), and Military (Adult) provide tripartite competition that prevents failure by moralization.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-10 08:55:00 UTC

  • READING LIST – THE FALL AND RISE OF OUR RELIGIONS Bryan Ward-Perkins: The Fall o

    READING LIST – THE FALL AND RISE OF OUR RELIGIONS

    Bryan Ward-Perkins: The Fall of Rome: And the End of Civilization

    Catherine Nixey : The Darkening Age: The Christian(Jewish) Destruction of the Classical World

    Ramsay MacMullen: Paganism and Christianity 100-425 C.E

    Ramsay MacMullen: Christianity and Paganism in the Fourth To Eighth Centuries

    James C. Russell: The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity

    Emmet Scott: Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited.

    Victor Davis Hanson: Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 17:05:00 UTC

  • Consciousness > Cooperation > Narration > Animism > Anthropomorphism > Idealism

    Consciousness > Cooperation > Narration > Animism > Anthropomorphism > Idealism > Abrahamism (judaism, islam) > Christian Theology > Rational Philosophy > Law > Science > Logic > Mathematics

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 18:11:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071467343937720320

  • Consciousness > Cooperation > Narration > Animism > Anthropomorphism > Idealism

    Consciousness > Cooperation > Narration > Animism > Anthropomorphism > Idealism > Abrahamism (judaism, islam) > Christian Theology > Rational Philosophy > Law > Science > Logic > Mathematics

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 13:11:00 UTC

  • “Curt, what are your disagreements with the Right, alt-Right”– A Friend (a) Wan

    –“Curt, what are your disagreements with the Right, alt-Right”– A Friend

    (a) Wanting the whole pie (idealism, utopianism) rather than solving the problem the only way possible – separatism and competition. (b) LARPING like there is any possibility whatsoever of achieving desirable ends without separation and civil war to achieve it; (c) Sophomoric, moralistic, psychological, or sentimental appeals for attention instead of issuing demands for policy changes, a plan to force their enaction, and a demand for men to act to force its implementation. (d) Acting like high school children (demonstrations, rallies, throwing a party) rather than issuing t demands backed by threats, like revolutionaries they need to be. (e) Throwing a rally like the left without a plan for entry, training, exit, withdrawal under fire, attack under pressure, and pre-staged resources. (f) the state has zero chance of winning – except leadership went to church on sunday thinking they were gonna sing hymns to get it done, and blowing their wad early rather than once prepared.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-07 14:54:00 UTC