Curt Doolittle

Form: Outline

  • The 22 Rules of Western Religious Hierarchy

    February 17th, 2019 12:53 PM “NO”. THE 22 RULES OF WESTERN RELIGIOUS HIERARCHY (important concept) (core)

    —“One doesn’t have to look hard in history to see how Christianity can serve all of the above groups at the same time in the same community. “—Andrew Gribble

    [N]o, because christianity requires you believe and testify to belief in magic man nonsense and while some people can do this in exchange for community comforts, the rest of us understand it is just fairy stories for the weak, for women, and children, to help them sleep at night despite their universal powerlessness. We can however understand the 5 rules of christianity, the 6 rules of heathenism, and the 8 rules of aryanism (our group’s strategy) as simply scientific, and we can thank our universe, our ancestors, and each other for creating and giving us all three, and train our children to likewise give thanks (carry the debt) of all three. Religions create debts that transfer between generations, and in doing so train one another to carry the same debts (behaviors). In exchange we obtain neural economy (reduction of problems in calculation), and trust economy, and political economy, by reducing internal conflicts to those counter to the debt structure and related payments (behaviors). This is the economics of religion. The problem is that stupid ignorant people need fairy stories and adults who have education and training simply need the truth: Heathenism of the universe, Aryanism of our people, Christianity of our social interactions. and Warriors as insurance of all of the above.

    The Heathen 6 rules The Aryan 8 rules The Christian 5 rules The Warrior 3 rules These are the 22 rules of western poly philosophical religion that I have been able to discover. I can refine them a bit. I can add the law. But this is what makes the west the west: 22 rules. The Oath of Transcendent Man

  • The 22 Rules of Western Religious Hierarchy

    February 17th, 2019 12:53 PM “NO”. THE 22 RULES OF WESTERN RELIGIOUS HIERARCHY (important concept) (core)

    —“One doesn’t have to look hard in history to see how Christianity can serve all of the above groups at the same time in the same community. “—Andrew Gribble

    [N]o, because christianity requires you believe and testify to belief in magic man nonsense and while some people can do this in exchange for community comforts, the rest of us understand it is just fairy stories for the weak, for women, and children, to help them sleep at night despite their universal powerlessness. We can however understand the 5 rules of christianity, the 6 rules of heathenism, and the 8 rules of aryanism (our group’s strategy) as simply scientific, and we can thank our universe, our ancestors, and each other for creating and giving us all three, and train our children to likewise give thanks (carry the debt) of all three. Religions create debts that transfer between generations, and in doing so train one another to carry the same debts (behaviors). In exchange we obtain neural economy (reduction of problems in calculation), and trust economy, and political economy, by reducing internal conflicts to those counter to the debt structure and related payments (behaviors). This is the economics of religion. The problem is that stupid ignorant people need fairy stories and adults who have education and training simply need the truth: Heathenism of the universe, Aryanism of our people, Christianity of our social interactions. and Warriors as insurance of all of the above.

    The Heathen 6 rules The Aryan 8 rules The Christian 5 rules The Warrior 3 rules These are the 22 rules of western poly philosophical religion that I have been able to discover. I can refine them a bit. I can add the law. But this is what makes the west the west: 22 rules. The Oath of Transcendent Man

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550461054 Timestamp) THE SCIENCE OF RELIGIOSITY IN THREE POINTS Negative correlation between intelligence and religion. Greater negative correlation for dogma than behavior. In other words people demonstrate ethical behavior under the advice of the religion’s wisdom literature but ignore the dogma.

    1. First, intelligent people are less likely to (need to) conform and, thus, are more likely to resist religious dogma.

    2. Second, intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs.

    3. Third, several functions of religiosity, including compensatory control, self-regulation, self-enhancement, and secure attachment, are also conferred by intelligence. Intelligent people may therefore have less need for religious beliefs and practices.

    In other words, we cannot NOT have some sort of intuitionistic training of some form. Women are biased toward greater demand for mindfulness out of genetics. The lower classes are biased toward greater demand for mindfulness out of ability. “RELIGION” SOLVES THE NEURAL ECONOMY PROBLEM BY SOLVING THE MINDFULNESS PROBLEM.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550505170 Timestamp) That which we can observe through instrumental and logical means That which we can observe That which we can experience That which we can deduce from experience That which we cannot experience (lack of introspection)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550505170 Timestamp) That which we can observe through instrumental and logical means That which we can observe That which we can experience That which we can deduce from experience That which we cannot experience (lack of introspection)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550587990 Timestamp) RESULTS OF TESTING THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT’S ABILITY TO CONDUCT A TRADE WITH THE GROWING UNAFFILIATED. Nothing. changed. at. all. HABITUATED REDUCTIONISM 0. It’s not possible for ordinary people to distinguish between (a) the law proper, and (b) the constitutional implementation of that law as federating contract, and (c) the regional or local law as adaptive to tradition and norm, where local constitutions that differ according to local preference (demand). So no matter how we preface it, we have a body politic indoctrinated into ideal thought and we are in a position where we must appeal to lowest common denominator in order to have the numbers to obtain power to demand constitutional reform (restoration of natural rights under natural law.) Disappointing but expected. Means we should continue to selectively include the ‘smart folk’ and work on the solution and disassociate from and ignore the non-intellectual class as the ‘voice of reason’ between left and right “in the interests of the center”. SPECIFY THE FRAME OF THE ANSWER (Despite frustrating the audience.) 1. I have to be very clear and preface every answer with whether they want the answer according to “the law”, a federal constitution(insurer of last resort limited to real property (private and public), a state constitution or a local constitution not limited to real property (including norms and commons). People think I’m waffling because they want a religion, philosophy, or ideology that isn’t a division of labor and purvey. But no matter what I do I end up with ‘in a propertarian world…?” (which is meaningless), rather than ‘with propertarianism can we construct….?” We can construct anything. There are at least three possible means of running a government given our current condition. EXPLAIN FROM THE TOP DOWN 2. In explanations I need to start at the top down (vision) rather than bottom up (science) and say that P, at least for european peoples, would recommend, because of our genetics and cultures, that we restore the many states if not city states of europe. And that MOST of the time when I am talking I am recommending that solution. HOWEVER, we can (a) do so and secede, we can (b) simply devolve the federal government and sort without seceding, or (c)we can attempt to take over the federal government and enforce the devolution of the federal scope of responsibilities and devolve non-real-property (everything but insurer of last resort) to the states. In other words, P IS TOOLKIT. With the P TOOLKIT I am proposing one of a nearly infinite number of constitutions for different peoples. IMPOSSIBILITY OF STANDARDIZATION – Trade Impossible. 3. Religiosity/Rationality/Science and class/intelligence, religious heritage/tradition, training into different sects, There exists no immediate solution to the problem of our religions other than prohibiting alien religions, providing incentives, and letting time continue to run its course. Why? Just as animals imprint we behave similarly thru training that is continuously reinforced and justified. And only significant adaptive opportunity or pressure alters this training. Those of us who are more naturally scandinavian will migrate one way, those more continental another, and those more mediterranean or slavic another, and that will simply mean the preservation of our cults. The problem is not there, but in eliminating further jewish and muslim damage to the civilization. NATURE TAKE ITS COURSE, ABANDON ATTEMPT AT RESTORING THE CHURCH 4. For my part it is better to truncate the constitutional section on religion, not try to save or reform the religion, expand education, expand festivals and holidays, and let natural evolution take its course in the production of educational differences that are expressible as religious differences. In other words it is not possible to restore the centrality of the church to the polity. Without the compromise of truth, there is no means by which the faithful and the rational can be institutionally unified. PIVOT MAINSTREAM 5. I think P is better for normies ‘that want to get along’ than for the right wing and left wing fringe. And pivoting away from the fringe to the mainstream is something we should have done a bit earlier, but are now only able to. Even though I think we are not ready. Underlying biological imperatives. … (F) – Religious fringe (Feminine/Submission), … (aM) – Anarchic fringe(Exchange). … (eM) – Authoritarian Fringe(Masculine/Dominance), All of these fringes look for rules by which they can avoid negotiation and compromise with people (monopolies). Each express their bias in method of argument (paradigm and vocabulary) as well as masculine libertarian or feminine application of (eM) Established-Masculine-Threat, (aM)Ascendent-Masculine-Exchange-Boycott, or (F)Feminine-Undermining. In other words genetics rule and the fringes cannot compromise leaving the mainstream and mainstream incentives as the optimum and letting the fringes drive demand for a viable solution to coming conflict. This disassociates us further from the fringe and lowers resistance to the spread of the movement. However, this occurs at the expense of an increase in the cost and time of distribution. And alters the pitch somewhat to appeal to the mainstream leaving only the far left as an opponent. -Curt (PS: And y’all thought I was just trolling christians…..)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551035413 Timestamp) The Generations of European Thought: Gen1: Heathen (ancestral, seasons, nature) (ALL) Gen2: Aryan (exhaustive heroism and excellence) (UPPER) Gen3: Aristotelian (exhaustive naturalism, science, law) (MIDDLE) Gen4: Christian (exhaustive forgiveness and charity) (LOWER) I would be Aryan, Aristotelian, Heathen, Christian in my priorities. Kind of wonder what other priorities others feel. HEATHEN …………………….CHRISTIAN |………………………………………………….| |………………………………………………….| |………………………………………………….| |………………………………………………….| ARYAN…………………….ARISTOTELIAN

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551106968 Timestamp) THE LAW ON RECIPROCITY, RESTITUTION, PUNISHMENT, AND PREVENTION Restitution (1x) for Accident Double (2x) Damages for failure to admit Triple (3x) Damages against individuals for harm Decuple (10x) Damages against groups for harm. The law has three purposes for three parties to any suit. 1. Restitution (victim) 2. Punishment (criminal) 3. Prevention (polity) Groups must be HEAVILY incentivized to limit their own behavior since sacrificial actors exist in every group, and can advance group interests if not controlled by the group. Hence 1. Punishment of the individual. 2. Punishment of the individual’s family (insurers of individuals) 3. Punishment of the group (insurers of families) …

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551035413 Timestamp) The Generations of European Thought: Gen1: Heathen (ancestral, seasons, nature) (ALL) Gen2: Aryan (exhaustive heroism and excellence) (UPPER) Gen3: Aristotelian (exhaustive naturalism, science, law) (MIDDLE) Gen4: Christian (exhaustive forgiveness and charity) (LOWER) I would be Aryan, Aristotelian, Heathen, Christian in my priorities. Kind of wonder what other priorities others feel. HEATHEN …………………….CHRISTIAN |………………………………………………….| |………………………………………………….| |………………………………………………….| |………………………………………………….| ARYAN…………………….ARISTOTELIAN

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551194497 Timestamp) NEXT STEPS IN PIVOT TO “GOOD GOVERNMENT” OK, so next steps in pivot: EMPHASIS 1 – Emphasize policy (benefits) 2 – Emphasize Light Secession (decentralization of norms) 2 – Emphasize constitution (processes and procedures) 3 – Emphasize means of demand (actions to produce implementation.) MESSAGE: SOMETHING FOR EVERYONE -EVERYONE WINS 4 – Maintain “Something for Everyone, but no Monopoly” …. (a) Rights of exit, secession, voluntary disassociation for all. …. (b) State religion for christians (god/jesus), pagans(hero gods), heathens (kin) …. (c) Rule of law, devolution, secession for the libertarians …. (d) Separatism for the nationalists …. (e) Strong Man “Lite” for the fascists. …. (f) National Socialism (French Version) for the average man. MESSAGE: PUNISH THE WICKED – ONLY THE WICKED LOSE 5 – Commercial, Financial, Economic, Political, Educational dishonesty, parasitism, predation, and destruction of not only our people but all people. DE-EMPHASIS 6 – De-Emphasize Methodology …. (a) Methodology is for Jurists, Prosecutors, Inquisitors, social scientists, professors, and teachers. …. (b) The law is simple in the list of rights and applications. …. (c) The law is only ‘complex’ in its language and definitions. …. (d) There is only one law: Reciprocity (Trade). And only one good: exchanges that produce reciprocal preferences.