THE CHOICE OF THREE POSSIBLE ELITES – AND THE CONSEQUENCES
There are only three sets of these elites in the West vying for power:
The Jewish Female Authoritarian strategy of undermining, and continuing the rapid conquest of western civilization by incentivizing race, class, sex, cultural, informational conflict – and even logical conflict, and underclass invasion – repeating the fall of Rome, and their repetition in Bolshevik revolution and terrors, and German counter-revolution against it.
The Semitic Roman Catholic and French Feminine Authoritarian strategy of state dominance, bloody terrors, and socialism leading to slow conquest of Europe by Islam.
Or the European, Germanic, and Anglo continuation of our masculine ancient rule of law repeating the otherwise unimaginable success of Europeans in the Bronze Age of pre-literate Indo-European expansion, the Iron Age Greek reason Roman administration and Roman peace – that dragged mankind out into reason and failed, and the European age of sail and steel’s that dragged mankind single-handedly, kicking and screaming all the while, out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vice of oppression between human tyranny and the vicissitudes of a nature, geology, climate, solar system, and universe all but hostile to the existence of life – and is on the verge of failure.
We have a choice between a future under the Jewish Muslim Semitic civilization of endemic lying, parasitism, stagnation, decline, and dysgenia – another dark age and the very real possibility of failing to pass through the Great Filter – or to continue the European Tradition and its high costs, and to transcend ourselves into the gods we imagine by continuing our long history of discovery, adaptation to, and application of, the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, nature, and nature’s god.
NO THE JEWS ALWAYS HAD CHOICES – THEY CHOSE
—“It’s not an accident that Jews in Europe excelled at financial endeavors and professions: it was all they were allowed to do, so characterizing it as “parasitism” is unfair. Every human economic activity can be characterized as “parasitic.”— @KCDefenseLawyer
You haven’t stated why it’s all they were allowed to do (record of conspiracy against the population), or why they were able to do it (non-payment for ore responsibility for defense, institutions, commons, territory), or why they were allowed to do it (the nobility lacked bankers until the Templars), or what the rate of interest was (300%+), or why they charged that rate of interest (baiting into seizure), or what they did if it couldn’t be paid (seizure).
The Jewish group evolutionary strategy is ‘avoiding the cost of territory, commons, rule, and defense, by creating a state within a state, by undermining by baiting into hazard while escaping warranty and liability and maintaining plausible deniability’. This is the group strategy of human females.
This is why I am concerned that reforming our laws to prevent this method of fraud made possible by our first right of self-determination isn’t enough – because it’s a genetic strategy and they manifest feminine cognition, verbal ability, speech, method of argument, workload.
We don’t think of it this way but females are more aggressive than males. Jews and Arabs are more aggressive than Europeans. This has something to do with sensitivity to status signals (lower neoteny) and is likely related to the Jewish and Arab and all south Eurasian tendency to lie by face before truth even when unnecessary and to treat deceit as cunning and prideful.
As for claiming people are generally parasitic, that’s false. All cooperation under reciprocity is non-parasitic – and it’s disproportionately productive. There is no other action that is more beneficial than cooperation. Adaptive cooperation is the most beneficial which i why we can afford these expensive brains.
The purpose of the common natural law is to incrementally suppress parasitism. There is a unique vulnerability in western civilization because we use adversarial meritocratic markets in every aspect of life, under the principle of self-determination by sovereignty. This means we do not defend the population against scams like other peoples do.
As in all things the west is an engine of natural selection but only if it continues to suppress methods of irreciprocity no matter how complex.
NO, EUROPEANS ARE THE CHOSEN PEOPLE
The Jews are not gods chosen people, Europeans are – because we alone discovered the word of god written in his hand, in the fabric of the universe, and we alone serve as the hand of God, discovering, adapting to, applying those laws, and serving God by his words – not by the lies of the jews. Abraham was a devil, jews are his followers, Jesus tried to rescue them, and Paul invented Churchianity, and Muhammed converted Christianity into Islam to restore them to ignorance, superstition, and dysgenia.
-“@curtd Fabric of the universe you say, so how do you interact with this fabric and when did it tell you about Europeans being the chosen people.”-
1) They’re called the Formal (logical), Physical, Behavioral, and Evolutionary laws of the universe. The universe is made from those laws.
2) Men lie. Abraham invented advanced lying. Abrahamism teaches lying. Judaism, Churchianity, and Islam are made from Abrahamic lying. These lies do not correspond to the evidence of God’s word and deed. If anything, Abraham was a devil, and the jews chose him as their god.
3) Only Europeans discovered, adapted to, and applied those laws of the universe, and the universe’s god.
4) Jesus told us how to tolerate those tragic laws: love.
5) Paul and the rest of the Jews converted it into magic and lies of ignorance superstition deceit, and servitude. The rabbinical movement reformed the jews to undermine our civilization as well, and Islam imitated Christianity as outright warfare, rather than insurrection against the indo-european (Iranic and European) empires.
THE CHOICE OF THREE POSSIBLE ELITES – AND THE CONSEQUENCES
There are only three sets of these elites in the West vying for power:
The Jewish Female Authoritarian strategy of undermining, and continuing the rapid conquest of western civilization by incentivizing race, class, sex, cultural, informational conflict – and even logical conflict, and underclass invasion – repeating the fall of Rome, and their repetition in Bolshevik revolution and terrors, and German counter-revolution against it.
The Semitic Roman Catholic and French Feminine Authoritarian strategy of state dominance, bloody terrors, and socialism leading to slow conquest of Europe by Islam.
Or the European, Germanic, and Anglo continuation of our masculine ancient rule of law repeating the otherwise unimaginable success of Europeans in the Bronze Age of pre-literate Indo-European expansion, the Iron Age Greek reason Roman administration and Roman peace – that dragged mankind out into reason and failed, and the European age of sail and steel’s that dragged mankind single-handedly, kicking and screaming all the while, out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vice of oppression between human tyranny and the vicissitudes of a nature, geology, climate, solar system, and universe all but hostile to the existence of life – and is on the verge of failure.
We have a choice between a future under the Jewish Muslim Semitic civilization of endemic lying, parasitism, stagnation, decline, and dysgenia – another dark age and the very real possibility of failing to pass through the Great Filter – or to continue the European Tradition and its high costs, and to transcend ourselves into the gods we imagine by continuing our long history of discovery, adaptation to, and application of, the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, nature, and nature’s god.
NO THE JEWS ALWAYS HAD CHOICES – THEY CHOSE
—“It’s not an accident that Jews in Europe excelled at financial endeavors and professions: it was all they were allowed to do, so characterizing it as “parasitism” is unfair. Every human economic activity can be characterized as “parasitic.”— @KCDefenseLawyer
You haven’t stated why it’s all they were allowed to do (record of conspiracy against the population), or why they were able to do it (non-payment for ore responsibility for defense, institutions, commons, territory), or why they were allowed to do it (the nobility lacked bankers until the Templars), or what the rate of interest was (300%+), or why they charged that rate of interest (baiting into seizure), or what they did if it couldn’t be paid (seizure).
The Jewish group evolutionary strategy is ‘avoiding the cost of territory, commons, rule, and defense, by creating a state within a state, by undermining by baiting into hazard while escaping warranty and liability and maintaining plausible deniability’. This is the group strategy of human females.
This is why I am concerned that reforming our laws to prevent this method of fraud made possible by our first right of self-determination isn’t enough – because it’s a genetic strategy and they manifest feminine cognition, verbal ability, speech, method of argument, workload.
We don’t think of it this way but females are more aggressive than males. Jews and Arabs are more aggressive than Europeans. This has something to do with sensitivity to status signals (lower neoteny) and is likely related to the Jewish and Arab and all south Eurasian tendency to lie by face before truth even when unnecessary and to treat deceit as cunning and prideful.
As for claiming people are generally parasitic, that’s false. All cooperation under reciprocity is non-parasitic – and it’s disproportionately productive. There is no other action that is more beneficial than cooperation. Adaptive cooperation is the most beneficial which i why we can afford these expensive brains.
The purpose of the common natural law is to incrementally suppress parasitism. There is a unique vulnerability in western civilization because we use adversarial meritocratic markets in every aspect of life, under the principle of self-determination by sovereignty. This means we do not defend the population against scams like other peoples do.
As in all things the west is an engine of natural selection but only if it continues to suppress methods of irreciprocity no matter how complex.
NO, EUROPEANS ARE THE CHOSEN PEOPLE
The Jews are not gods chosen people, Europeans are – because we alone discovered the word of god written in his hand, in the fabric of the universe, and we alone serve as the hand of God, discovering, adapting to, applying those laws, and serving God by his words – not by the lies of the jews. Abraham was a devil, jews are his followers, Jesus tried to rescue them, and Paul invented Churchianity, and Muhammed converted Christianity into Islam to restore them to ignorance, superstition, and dysgenia.
-“@curtd Fabric of the universe you say, so how do you interact with this fabric and when did it tell you about Europeans being the chosen people.”-
1) They’re called the Formal (logical), Physical, Behavioral, and Evolutionary laws of the universe. The universe is made from those laws.
2) Men lie. Abraham invented advanced lying. Abrahamism teaches lying. Judaism, Churchianity, and Islam are made from Abrahamic lying. These lies do not correspond to the evidence of God’s word and deed. If anything, Abraham was a devil, and the jews chose him as their god.
3) Only Europeans discovered, adapted to, and applied those laws of the universe, and the universe’s god.
4) Jesus told us how to tolerate those tragic laws: love.
5) Paul and the rest of the Jews converted it into magic and lies of ignorance superstition deceit, and servitude. The rabbinical movement reformed the jews to undermine our civilization as well, and Islam imitated Christianity as outright warfare, rather than insurrection against the indo-european (Iranic and European) empires.
AMERICAN EXTREMISTTHE PSYCHOLOGY OF POLITICAL EXTREMISM
By Josh Neal, Perth, Imperium Press 2020
The writing, especially for a book with conservative interests, reads ‘luxuriously’. Cogent, clear, sincere, emotive, deeply informed, rich vocabulary, well edited, insightful, and providing a correct diagnosis – and absolutely free of unfounded, speculative, or hyperbolic claims. So the author rapidly, and justifiably, obtains the reader’s trust.
The premise is stated clearly and directly, and followed by example after example. In fact, after the first chapter, the book is a topic by topic exposition of the crisis of our age, thoroughly defending his theory. And the book is divided into the usual three acts: the problem, examination, and what to do about it. In Act 1, the author lays out his premise. I won’t cover act two of the book – it’s filled with examples that are better read than summarized. Act three is a plea for solutions and virtue – but a solution isn’t provided.
The general thesis is that extremism in defense of the good isn’t extremism, and extremism in the prosecution of the bad isn’t extremism, but extremism in pursuit of the bad is extremism, and therefore conservatives are not extremists and that conservatives are justified in the prosecution of the bad – just not by extremism.
A very minor ‘editorial’ criticism of the title of the book. In my experience as a fellow traveler in this field, that like religiosity in the USA, conservatism in the USA is unlike that of UK and Europe – and is anti-intellectual, bordering on a demand for Christian, germanic, or greek parable – or video game, graphic novel, or comic book for that matter. Perhaps the minority of intellectuals is the publisher and author’s target. And so I would have suggested a title more of a promise of what the reader will get from reading it. (“In Defense of Elitism” by Henry comes to mind by analogy.)
Summary:
For Traditionalists and Christians, this book will provide reinforcement of priors, ideas and examples, useful framing, and apologetic positioning for arguing with the opposition. For those along the journey of learning this is the state of the art for non-technical understanding. For political activists, this is a thorough critique of the present conditions gently couched in unthreatening language. And it ends on an optimistic if unactionable note. For intellectuals that already know the data I think my commentary on the book will provide more insight especially because instead of literary and psychological language I use economic and legal terms.
And in general, the book is a worthy read. Much more so that almost anything else that comes across my desk from within the anglosphere.Notes and Comments:
In my understanding, the difference between left extremism by incremental destruction and the only possible means of countering it by faster extremism is not a philosophical but simply practical reality. The left are extremists by increment, and the right are extremists by rapid action. This difference is just that of between the warfare strategies of females by verbal social undermining and males by physical political violence. It’s not complicated, It’s not theoretical, It’s not even necessary to plan. It’s just instinct we have as primates. And we live in the Third Age: the roman road, greek writing, and slow Christian revolt. The printing press and slow protestant counter-revolt against superstition. And the era of industrial production, mass media, and the Jewish pseudoscientific revolt. The first ended in endemic warfare and a dark age. The second in hundreds of years of wars, and this one has already brought on two world wars, and we don’t know at the moment but it certainly looks like it’s bringing on world war three.
Note that the author is relying on psychology and empathy, and I’m relying on group strategy, history, law, and economics. These are two different systems of thought. These are my comments from my skill set.
He begins with the failure of psychology, and psychologists functioning as a vanguard, freeing [individual] man from [tradition, ritual, community] (and psychology as pseudoscience and sophistry).
“An important argument which I will continue to make throughout this work is that no scientific fact or philosophical insight is born in a vacuum, and none of them are without their masters. They are the both the product of the State and the life’s blood by which it might legitimize, nay, realize its own raison d’être.”
I don’t know how it’s the product of the state, or that the state is available b/c of democracy in the absence of monarchy, as a tool of coercion of the people, just as is religion, just as moral norms, just as is science.
“Science is a tool of power, and thus the hard-won knowledge gained through the scientific method inevitably becomes a tool
for State expansion and oppression, in addition to the other benefits it can provide.”
Instead, we seek power, the people in the state seek power, as scale and complexity increase, to prevent competing power, and to maximize extraction of returns that can be converted to commons to justify power, and converted to rents to reward themselves for use of power.
“scientific discipline, just like an individual, can decay, retard its own positive development,”
Science provides decidability (argumentative power), and cognitive, argumentative, and technological advantages, that can be used to influence, coerce and exert power. And the behavioral pseudosciences of the political ‘science’ (philosophy) of democracy and democratic socialism, economics, sociology, psychology, have been used to (a) replace a long history of empirically evolved (adversarial survival) traditions, morals, ethics, and norms, (b) to seek power by the capture of the state, under democracy, by false promises to an unknowing populace of freedom from the formal, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws of the universe, in the form of (i) freedom from physical scarcity by unlimited growth, (ii) freedom from behavioral self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, and kin selection, and (iii) freedom from the evolutionary genetic load, sexual market value, assortative mating, regression to the mean, natural selection, and the necessity of defeating the red queen – by the claim of oppression rather than continuous evolutionary domestication (pacification) of the animal man, as with any other domesticated animal.
“… it is now a fact that knowledge is diluted, hoarded,and weaponized for the purposes of State control. “
Christianity was imposed by the same means in the supernatural age as marxism-neo-marxism-postmodenrism in the present. The Failure of the people to defend against the present pseudoscientific era is nothing more than women in the voting pool, followed by immigrants, none of whom have evolved with the (harsh) European (demanding) tradition of conformity to physical natural and evolutionary laws in politics, government, and war, and in Christian ethics in private and social life. So I sort of agree that science has replaced supernaturalism and that we are going through a repeat of the Christian destruction of the ancient world, using the same methodology, same false promises, but this time a pseudoscientific religion of hate vs supernatural religion of love.
“Differences of opinion are no longer met with cautious optimism and curiosity but scathing hatred.”
This is because (a) the argumentative power of science with near term material advantage, is greater than the argumentative power of supernaturalism with long term advantage. (b) there the only solution to arguing against science is denial, shouting down, and silencing.
And so we come to the author’s mission statement:
I humbly present a new analysis of political extremism. Moreover, I present a radical redefinition of extremism that aims to place the responsibility for our failings where they truly belong. In a way, I am engaging in the same tradition of liberation—not to undermine the psychological stability of the individual, nor to place more power in the hands of reckless and tyrannical institutions and advocacy groups, but to use my words like a crowbar to pry open the American mind and release the demons implanted there by generations of irresponsible scientists, talking heads, and policymakers.
And now we must understand how the author seeks to accomplish this worthy goal.
in Christopher Caldwell’s recent book The Age of Entitlement, where he pointed out that America is presently divided between the founding constitutional document and its mid-twentieth century legal replacement (brought about by the civil rights movement); we are not only contending with dueling legal understandings but dual and incompatible understandings of our own mythical, histori-
cal, and parabolic origins.
Well, this is correct, but it wasn’t brought about by the civil rights movement. Positive Law and the civil rights movement, massive immigration, and anti-male feminism were brought about by Jewish intellectuals taking advantage of our (a) legal common law (market) tradition as they took advantage of (b) the open democratic franchise (c) open access to public speech, universities, and the state (d) high trust and openness to a hostile religion and people (d) mass media and entertainment. Because Jewish legal theorists dominated 20th-century legal theory (Dworkin, Hart et al) just as they had dominated the other behavioral pseudosciences and logical sophistries (Gould, Harari, Boaz, Freud, Marx, Zin, the frankfurt and postmodern schools). And Jewish law is kritarchic (non-evolutionary, justificationary, legal positivism, rule by judges) instead of common law democratic, legislative, and by the jury (forcing the responsibility on the people for their own understanding, adaptation and accountability).
Our legal system is an evolutionary feedback loop, that preserves responsibility. The law is neutral. The natural laws of the universe are sovereign and we are accountable for our success or failure in adapting to them. The fact that the greeks Romans Catholics British and Americans have failed to state this clearly is simply one of doing what works without making up lies rather than making up lies to make society, polity, and economy work. In other words, the secret of western civilization’s rapid evolution in every era but the dark ages, is that we pay the high cost of testimonial truth (truth before face) regardless of the cost to self, competence, or dominance hierarchy – and no other civilization does or even comes close. We normalized military reporting because we began as entrepreneurial warriors and converted our entire polity to a militial army. The only means of governing such a polity is demonstrated by Viking, pirate, and entrepreneurial ethics: there is no authority other than reciprocity, and as such the law is sovereign. This is the most empirical social, political, economic, and military organization humanly possible, and is also the most adaptive.
So the problem is that our LAW wasn’t articulated scientifically by the time of the Warren Court, and that only changed a little bit with the Scalia court. This is in fact, the entirety of the problem. The political and legal institutions of Western civilization are those of craftsmen, engineers, soldiers, and pirates, and our western tradition handed down generation by generation as a practical craft that we DO – not one we debate. It is a purely empirical method of governance and has been for 5000 years.
But we have not devoted equal effort to state it scientifically as we have to the physical sciences. And I have a nagging suspicion that it’s because it’s exhaustively Darwinian and that the postwar Jewish war on western civilization, like the two thousand years of war against western civilization, is because it’s costly, reciprocal, meritocratic, Darwinian, and eugenic. And that the middle-class seizure of the aristocracy in the ancient world – Greece and Rome – as well as in the modern – England, America, and France – was by the false promise of an aristocracy of everyone, and the false promise that all men and women were as driven by middle-class virtues (commercial class imitations of military virtues). And it was false.
“if a people can be ripped from their inherited narratives (which are best understood as a true collective fiction or ideology), or merely have their narratives re-written in a way that is disempowering, then they necessarily become psychologically vulnerable to the slings and arrows of malevolent storytellers and cognitive colonizers.”
Correct as stated, insufficient in defense against implication. Narratives are best understood as a group’s evolutionary strategy in analogical form, – a system of weights and measures providing the group with cognitive, ethical, moral, interpersonal social political and military commensurability – so that the group can organize in large numbers unconsciously to advance that group strategy.
But this says nothing about the goodness or badness – meaning evolutionary fitness or unfitness of the strategy nor whether that strategy is productive, parasitic, or predatory. European group evolutionary strategy is by far, without peer, in its lack of deviation from formal (logical), physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, which is the reason for our high trust, prosperity, and extraordinary rate of evolutionary progress in bronze, iron, steel, and silicon ages.
So the author’s criticism is correct but fails to expose the sheer horror of westerners’ loss of their tradition compared to others. We are the only people that didn’t FAIL to discover, adapt to and apply the laws of the universe. So like many life forms were tried, most failed. Many civilizational strategies were tried, and most failed. Destroying western civilization is not just creating another dark age, but pushing mankind into a great filter. And so how is that for terrifying?
While it is not ideal to describe the resulting psychological deficits using the language of mental illness
We needed a paradigm for discussing psychology that isn’t pseudoscientific, and we have one, (Behavioral economics and natural law). But just as we were advanced in craftsmanly sciences (physical), we were not in behavioral sciences. The reason is a bit hard for the layman to grasp. But the age we are in is the computational age. Computation (algorithms, programming) is a novel kind of logic. Previous logic was ideal (mathematics) or verbal (sets) but only engineering and law were operational (algorithmic) – meaning “bound by realism and naturalism and a sequence of actions in time”. So in 1830, when Babbage built his machine, he didn’t convert it from engineering to logic, theory, or philosophy, and in doing so delayed until Turing’s era, and thereby delayed the logic that was necessary to explain the western tradition. Hayek and Popper came fairly close. But it is only the present generation of neuroscience, artificial intelligence, algorithmic logic combined with the evidence of behavioral economics that has given us the frame for the solution to the behavioral and evolutionary sciences, just as it was the generation of maxwell, Poincare, Hilbert, and einstein that gave us the frame for the solution of time and space.
In short, the subversion of religious, national, and ethnic mythos grants a tremendous capacity for political and social control. Much of contemporary discourse is itself a fight over the rights to our foundational myths so that they may be used to combat the social and political ills of our time—namely racism, anti-Semitism, fascism, inequality, misogyny, colonialism, imperialism, and homophobia (to name a few).
It’s more than that. it’s the second or third conflict of semitic and western civilization. Between western masculine rapid, innovative, adaptive, productive, and eugenic, and semitic feminine slow, stagnating, devolutionary, and dysgenic civilization – the ancient war of the newer steppe people and continuous change by the primacy of man gainst the older south Eurasian people and the primacy of spirits, gods, demons, and continuous stagnation – they cannot compete against creativity. Their first institution is religion (supernaturalism). Our first institution is the law (realism). We were, and are, the new gods that falsify theirs, their religion, their narratives, and their group strategy – and they hate us for it. Yet at the same time desperately come to live among us to gain the benefits of our realism.
“…as an expression of male fragility and terror.”
It is not fear, it is disgust. It is not terror, it is disgust. If there is any fear, it is not fear of them. It is fear of the destruction, devolution, and dysgenia they bring, to reverse five thousand years of our hard-fought transcendence of man – from their state as non-rational beasts, to our state of rational man.
And because myths have no authors, they can be seen as part of the commons—belonging to the public domain—and therefore subject to an unending sequence of reappropriations.
Again, as Hayek explained, but failed to solve, most civilizations defend their informational commons. But Europeans are trifunctional – competition between military, law, philosophy, and faith, and only the Chinese are likewise (sun tzu, confucius, lao-tzu, buddha). And the christian(empathic) – pre-Christian (analytic) made an eternal conflict that the Aristotelian restoration, Darwinian age, sought to solve. It was only postwar jews and their war gainst eugenics by the destruction of every single institution in western civilization that brought about this change.
My point is that we have now ‘scienced’ western civilization. We have explained western conviction as least divergent from the laws of the universe. We have explained that this is the reason for our disproportionate success. And we have explained why the other civilization – and in particular the most failed, devolutionary, and destructive civilization in human history: Semitic Abrahamic supernatural, is the destroyer of civilizations. And that this the second attempt to destroy western civilization by immigration, conversion, undermining, and destruction of our informational commons – and as a consequence our institutions and group strategy. This is a second Semitic dark age. The Chinese and the Indians understand the danger. It is our optimistic European high trust and our excessive sensitivity to altruistic punishment that prohibits us from equal warfare against these hostiles.
So the author’s premise is correct. The problem is it can’t be won argumentatively. We have to obtain the power to restore truthful speech, and if we do, the left literally can’t speak. Because the entire left program is nothing but lies and false promises.
“….Authority…”
There is no ‘authority’ in western civilization but nature and nature’s laws. That’s the whole point. The purpose of rule of law, of our ancient traditions, is not to produce authority, but to produce accountability from the lowest to the highest, just as in every military organization. The law says “we insure one another’s right to self-determination by self-determined means. This leaves us without authority other than the law. And only reciprocity, truth, duty, and markets to govern ourselves in daily life, and hierarchy in war. So in democratic government like all the rest of life the people may choose – but choose wisely – for you pay the costs of your choice.” This is why the emphasis on Monarchy or aristocracy, senate or nobility, house or commoners (farmers), and manor, church, or temple for those lacking demonstrated ability to meet these requirements.
So the problem isn’t authority. It’s that we lack a monarchy as a judge of last resort – and that our law is insufficiently articulated in the face of undermining by legal positivists, and our information under assault by lies and false promises by sophistry and pseudoscience, and our traditions by historical revisionist propaganda and overwhelming immigration. People are seeking authority because they don’t know how to solve the problem, and they know in their metaphysics that authority is bad. The answer is simple: finish ‘sciencing’ the law.
“authority” (again)
In the western tradition, we divide responsibility. We don’t delegate authority. We delegate responsibility for decidability. (The need to state this today is evidence of the thoroughness of the destruction of our history). The French destruction of the common law, by the imposition of the continental law, obscured the western tradition. We are all sovereign. Under the common law we are sovereign: equal before the law. Every man his own state and legislature. Americans alone still retain sovereignty in the law, and therefore sovereignty of the individual, and not sovereignty of state or parliament. (So, that’s what ‘outlaw’ means. Outside the protection of the law. Outside of the reciprocal insurance of defense. “Open season”: no longer insured by the people. “Do what you will with him and his assets”.) So Americans, until now, and previously the British and the Germans, before parliament took sovereignty from the common law, and therefore from men.
This is the reason for the set of (Jewish postwar) lies:
(a) The USA is not a country, it is a federation of states (like Europe is trying and failing to create). The USA uses the British form of government but is modeled after the holy roman empire o the german people, which only fell after napoleon’s conquest after having existed for a thousand years: a loose federation of many microstates.
(b) The USA is not a democracy. it is a Republic under rule of law – meaning LIMITED power granted to the executive, legislature and courts, by the people to act on their behalf. A republic is intended to use representatives with demonstrated evidence of skills necessary to make political-economic and military decisions. (We no longer do that.)
(c) The constitution is not a living document. It is a statement of natural law, (reciprocity) and amendments, legislation, and findings of the court (case law) are transactions that modify that law. It’s an accounting system in law.
(d) The law is not open to reinterpretation or judicial discretion – the court interprets the text (textualism) as by original meaning (originalism) so that the transactions against the constitution are performed only by the legislature. (Thanks to Saint Judge Antonin Scalia.)
(d) The purpose of limiting the court to those measurements is to demanding that all changes pass thru the public debate through the legislature and that no ‘specialist, or ‘authority’ exists other than survival of adversarial competition in the legislature on behalf of the people who voted for the representatives.
(e) Rule OF law does not mean rule BY law. Rule of law by natural law means that the law is sovereign and every individual sovereign under it. Rule by law means the laws of the universe (natural law), and the people are not sovereignty – but the legislature is. America is the only country where the law is sovereign. Every other country now has parliamentary sovereignty. And rule of law by natural law is the only method of maintaining human adaptation to changes in circumstances (scientific government).
(f) Some form of Democracy is necessary under rule of law – because there is no authority other than the law, and therefore only the people can decide, only as a jury (congress) and only after adversarial competition (argument, and voting)
(g) Every form of Democracy functions as market. Multiple house government functions as a market between states, and classes. (We Broke that by direct election of the senate).
Markets under rule of law will produce moral consumer capitalism. Markets under rule by law will not. Markets under arbitrary rule will produce black markets. Attempting to circumvent markets will produce black markets, corruption, disincentives, starvation, and decline.
“Conservatism to a great degree is an instinct toward retention”
Not quite. Conservatism is to a great degree, demand for empirical evidence given that western people, or at least northern European western people given the tendency of human ignorance, error, wishful thinking, fraud, and deceit, continue the tradition of personal responsibility for the commons – just as soldiers do their duty on behalf of the army because every link in the chain must remain closed or it will break. There is a reason our ancestors used princes and princesses, warriors and saints, and the catholic church taught us dogma in the mirror image of European law. The higher the trust the lower the conservatism. The lower the trust the higher the conservatism. So as the left destroys trust conservatives double down.
the disposition of the Northwestern peoples who conquered the American continent, in conjunction with the selective pressures which attracted different ethnic groups to this country once it had been settled, established individualism as the American modus operandi.
Not quite true. The history of Europe, and in particular the Holy Roman Empire, the germanic civilization of which England was an integral member, maintains the same legal and operational system from prehistory to the present. (Prior to the spartan example. Sparta is the only group that retained the traditions of the Indo European steppe expansion across Europe into the period of writing. They didn’t innovate in response to the peasant (slave) revolt they returned to the previous tradition. It is one thing to read literature, and it is another thing to read law and economy. While the literature changes the law and economy and group strategy remain the same – for the past five thousand years – with the Jewish Christian invasion, like this invasion of pseudoscience, and the dark age that followed the only interruption.
Americans struggle to think through many social and political questions largely because of the heavily confused moral language we bring to our dialogue.
Again, the British agrarian, commercial, financial, industrial revolutions came so rapidly and in such sequence and under such conditions of western dominance of the world because of these tremendous technical innovations, didn’t require us much introspection into the science of our own functions until we were attacked by the second Jewish conquest of marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, antimale feminism, pc, woke, anti-whiteness, white genocide.
So let me say this a little more directly: westerners conquered the world with our innovations because of our 5000-year tradition of innovation and adaptation, but we didn’t self reflect on the science of WHY we produced our innovations as much as we did the innovations themselves, we just congratulated ourselves on our ethics and morals and virtues without knowing what made them – as if they were a choice when they were just a deterministic outcome of an accident of history, caused by the necessity of organizing steppe raiders into an army that could protect vast herds with bronze, horse, and cart, and increase caloric consumption by 30%+ by doing so, escaping the victimization of nature by doing so, and converting to the primacy of man over nature and gods by doing so, and to conquer everything from Spain to China as a consequence. And in four earas: the bronze, steel, iron and now silicon, drag man out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early eath, the tyranny of men, and the vicissitudes of nature all but hostile to human life.
Along came another people who are innovators in LYING AND DECEIT from a 10,000-year tradition of lying and deceit, with a technology of lying and deceit that is as advanced as our testimonial truth, mathematics, science, technology, law, and politics. And they LEAPFROGGED us in deceptive technology because of unique vulnerabilities in our ancestral unwritten tradition: self-determination, openness to competition, and trust. Just as they leapfrogged us with Jewish Christianity in the ancient world. Why? Because religion is a resistance force against change. And while there are only three institutions available to man masculine army-state, neutral commerce, and law, feminine faith, and religion, the order that we develop them in creates an architecture that is immutable over time. We are materialists as any military must be, and developed law, the state, and then religion, meaning religion was our weak – the last institution As such it was the means of insurrection. The same is true today. Our church failed to reform – even though the seeds were there in our common law, the catholic natural law, and the Jeffersonian bible – and we were out-competed in our weakest institution by the people that failed at law and state: Jews and Muslims. The lesson is that we must reform our ‘religion’ so that it is no longer vulnerable to ‘leapfrogging’ by competing religions predicated on LIES and FALSE PROMISES, rather than truths: that we Europeans by every measure possible, discover, adapt to, and apply the laws of the universe and universe’s god. That Jesus’ teaching was philosophical, not theological, and a provided a means of underclass tolerance of this rapid adaptation and it’s natural eugenics, by exhaustive application of love and charity. That the jews took this man’s teaching and made a mockery of lies out of it as a means of insurrection. That the Muslims took this means of insurrection and weaponized it themselves and destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world, reducing it to ritual ignorance, ritual superstition, dysgenia, despotism, nihilism, irresponsibility, and endemic inescapable poverty.
the politics of misrepresentation (PoM, henceforth) consist of 1) the maligning of intent 2) a demand for hyper-accountability (holding an individual or group responsible for acts that are unreasonable or cannot be justified; or to say this in a simpler way, holding one’s interlocutor to a higher moral standard than would be typically expected), 3) outright libel or slander, 4) projection, and 5) an unwillingness to disclose one’s own true belief or objective.
Yes. Or more globally, Avoidance of a competitive and equally articulated equally criticizable argument in order to obscure their intent, by some combination of false promise by supernatural, sophistic, or pseudoscientific means: Pilpul (sophistry) and undermining the arguer by Critique (undermining), by “GSRRM”: denial, distraction, outraging, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, ridicule, gossiping, reputation destruction; and by heaping of undue praise on some tangential character that advances their interests. This is because they are engaged in some form of free-riding, parasitism, predation or destruction and would be hung if they stated their intentions openly.
Now the author explains his concept of extremism:
Political extremism is not necessarily about any particular ideology or objective, but rather a set of biopsycho- social predispositions and an overall attitude of hostility toward eusocial practices and conventions. What is political extremism? It is the instantiation of the death principle, of Thanatos, as per Freud. The extremist stands in diametrical opposition to the radical who seeks life, and for whom destruction is a controlled and methodical tool wielded for the purpose of greater creation (a conception of the death instinct that is more in alignment with Sabina Speilrein’s interpretation).
Ok. That’s a bit of postmodern prose right there. Let’s convert it to “Extremism consists of hostility to eusocial (living in a cooperative group) practices and conventions (group strategy, organizational strategy, metaphysical, formal, traditional, normative institutions) in pursuit of imagined creative destruction (revolution) in pursuit of an ideal (utopia).”
Unfortunately, this says nothing about whether the extremist is trying to restore western civilization’s evolutionary arc, or destroy it like the jews and Muslims have so man other civilizations and reduced them to chaos, murder, and ashes.
The extremist says, “either I get exactly what I want or I’ll burn everything to the ground.” Higher-functioning and genetically gifted types will find success in working toward their individual projects, as their natural abilities allow them to more deftly navigate social realities, though they still find themselves unable to restrain their more tyrannical impulses.
True so how is an internal extremist practicing INFORMATIONAL WARFARE different from an internal revolutionary practicing physical warfare, from an external actor practicing Total war (strategic, military, economic, social, religous, informational), or different from an external actor using terrorism (violence)? Internal vs external, and choice of weaponry.
we are caught between two competing understandings of the extremist. The first, a self-serving definition which aids the program of hegemonic power, and the second (more useful understanding) which allows us to recognize, for the first time, who truly threatens our welfare and the future of the American project.
Of course. Extremism isn’t a meaningful criticism without the context of the end goal.
I must be frank and say that we can’t meaningfully defeat extremism, and when we consider the current methodology for doing so, the project appears doubly flawed.
If such a thing is even possible then I will offer my thoughts. A good place to start may be found in attacking (and ultimately replacing) the pathocrat’s vision for the future.
At this point I feel slight embarrassment over the vague description I have provided, so I will try to get to the essential core of my message. Man must be provided an alternative to steer him away from despair, but also to disincline him from taking immediate, thoughtless, and destructive action out of sheer frustration.
The claustrophobia produced by liberalism and its derivatives is not an anxiety over physical spaces so much as it is an anxiety of metaphysical spaces which stifle man’s relation to himself, his fellow man, and to God.
This isn’t quite right. Instead, the promise of personal prosperity, of personal choice of destiny, of personal fulfillment because of that prosperity, of not having to fulfill civic obligations, not having compromise, and develop personal bonds by doing so, of living in a box of one’s own illusion, of television characters as substitutes for friends, of news media and entertainment as preachers from the pulpit, and of sating the anxiety of alienation that results by consumption, fits the temporary needs of the highly self-interested, highly prosocial, and hyper consumptive who find no value in family and the company of families and the transformation of commons for the enjoyment of families.
We did not come together as the left promised and woman intuit – we diverged by genetic interests. Because unless we are common in interest in our families we are uncommon in interest in the self and the self alone – and we rage in various political spheres attempting to shame others into meaningful action that we ourselves will not bear the cost of bringing in to being. This is why the family has been and must be the priority and principal unit of social organization. Because it is the most costly, producing the highest returns. While hyperconsumption of hyper novelty is just another drug of personal consumption that one becomes addicted to at the cost of civilization itself.
Truly visionary anti-extremists—visionaries of every kind—must be willing to offer man a better deal, and not corral him into accepting the unjust one which has been foisted upon him without his consent and without consideration for its effects.
It is all well and good to ask anti-intellectual, zealously supernatural, largely uneducated masses of demasculinated man-boys to eschew political violence and provide an alternative – but the author, despite being a masculine, rational, intellectual, doesn’t provide us with any answer, only a justification for our anger and frustration.
But truly, the most impactful thing anyone who is worried about the state of the world can do is to build for themselves that which has been denied to them: faith, love, family, and honor. Or to say it another way, one should seek a life of virtue.
And here we come to face our disappointment. Conservatives shrug, focus on the local, and give away the political. and continue to die a slow death by the incremental erasure of their civilization and their genes – cowards all. Because there is no morality on the other side of the fence. They are herd animals doing as herd animals do, and thieves doing as thieves do, and they have done nothing in history but more of the same.
So I’ll take on the extremist role because hope isn’t a strategy, and faith isn’t a tactic:
The solution is (a) understanding what made the west successful (b) reforming our institutions to end the war against it (c) taking up arms to defeat, or separate. Because they have no intention of settling on any of our terms. Over time we will rapidly out-compete them as they create favelas and we create heavens on earth – forever barring them and their descendence from entry. To live in the hell of their own creation. As they would do to us.
He’s right. A book isn’t going to change anything.
The thief will never face his crimes, and no criminal organization will tolerate being outlawed.
What’s going to change it is a civil war. A war that I have at least, tried to prevent by providing a solution. And it’s not working.
Curt Doolittle
Jan 24, 2021
AFTERWORDI received this preview from the publisher. And I didn’t recognize the author’s name until I did a bit of searching. I think I’ve spoken to, or been interviewed by the author a few times. And while I don’t recall it specifically I remember it as an unpleasant and hostile experience – which is fine, because I’m a disagreeable “bad boy” of philosophy so I attract hostility. That doesn’t color my opinion of the writing – which is excellent. And frankly, I’m glad to see this quality of work out of him – or anyone else on the right.–CD
1. The pressures of Geographic, economic, organizing strategy (steppe herding) led proto Europeans to develop a universal, entrepreneurial (voluntary) militia (militarized society), and military reporting’. (See political economy of Sparta, Vikings and Pirates.
2. In such a political system, status was available by merit in empirical adversarial competition at high risk (raiding cattle).
3. And Europeans (uniquely) normatively institutionalized testimonial (empirical) speech (military reporting), and the resulting high ingroup trust.
4. There exist only three means of human coercion:force(military-state), reumuneration(commerce-law), and ostracization-undermining(normative society-religion): State+Law+Religion
5. The order of the development of those institutions causes all macro civilizational differences.
6. The rate of civilizational adaptation and innovation depends on the order of these institutions.
7. Europeans(uniquely) developed empirical Law of Tort(strong) > State(weak) > Religion (fail).
8. It’s the fastest evolutionary model for organizing humans that is possible, and produces the least divergence from the formal(logical), physical and logical laws of the universe.
9. This is why Fukuyama erred. And what frustrates Statists. European civ’s radical rate of evolution in bronze, iron, steel, and silicon ages, is due to continuous demand for status by discovering opportunity and by forcing the people to adapt to change. All others stagnate.
10. Tort Law continues natural selection, domestication, evolution without design or intention. European law(martial order) limited competition to cooperative market and conflict in court with judicially sanctioned Duel, Laws against Defamation, Gossips, and Shrills.
11. Political competition between many states creates a Pareto optimum of political organization (power).
12. Law (natural law of reciprocity by tort) creates a Pareto optimum of economic production.
13. Marriage creates a nash optimum between sexes in a (military) polity.
14. Males are physical superpredators(fast) and females social superpredators(slow). Limiting conflict to positive commercial market, and negative court(law) markets, was a compromise equally suppressing(domesticating) both male (violence) and female(undermining) strategies.
15. Ergo, women and men were EQUALLY domesticated by suppression of EACH of their evolutionary conflict strategies – if they affected the peace (economy, society, polity) – “Ordnung” – and especially retaliation cycles (feuds) and even more so, taxation.
16. All of these policies force behavioral adaptation (domestication) into the polity, norms, traditions, institutions, by directing dominance expression into voluntary markets (association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons production, polity production, and war.)
17. Domestication (evolutionary adaptation) under these (ancient) rules occurred by physical ostracization (a death sentence), land use ostracization (manorial), credit ostracization (socio-economic), harsh winters, and ‘genetic pacification’ by hanging (political and judicial).
18. Free speech was a controversial because they couldn’t demarcate(in court) Truth b/c of Faith(Church). They enacted under these traditions.
19. Traditions like group strategy and metaphysics are presumptions – they may not be known, articulated – and certainly not codified.
20. The evolutionary history of man consists of maximizing bodily, social, cognitive, and extended phenotype (tech) adaptation in time. That’s it. For example, IQ (g) is just a measure of cognitive adaptation in time.
21. So the extraordinary success of the European peoples in bronze, iron, coal-steel, and silicon-oil ages, is due to continuing maximization of human adaptation by minimization the difference between human behavior and the laws of the universe.
22. And Europeans disproportionately and overwhelmingly – aside from the conquest by supernatural religion in the dark ages – dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality and early death.
23. But this rapidity and its rewards for a small population on the edge of the agrarian & bronze age, comes at the cost of (a) adaptive stress. (b) market suppression of the reproduction of those demonstrably by failing in markets. (c) Christian love for masses to tolerate it.
24. Until 1950s mainstream reporters maintained military experience, discipline, duty, and testimonial speech, and full integration into what’s today called ‘Whiteness’.
25. “Whiteness” Ironically, means ‘Science”, which means not violating Tort against the Commons by warranty of ‘due diligence necessary for producing testimonial speech – free of ignorance, error, bias, loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, and deceit.”
26. Then the Frankfurt School moved into Columbia University and took advantage of (a) free speech (b) Christian tolerance, (c) the enlightenment false promise of an aristocracy of everyone, (d) the first gen. off the farm (e)a windfall economy (f)ignorance of our group strategy
27. The frankfurt school and the postmodernists, anti-male feminists, PC/Woke, anti-whiteness that followed, used the female group strategy of undermining and reputation destruction against the entirety of the western strategy, metaphysics, institutions, traditions, and norms.
28. Destroying from within what had taken five thousand years of evolution producing the proto-European, Hellenic, Roman, Germanic(HRE-Prussian), Anglo(Scandinavian)-American institutions from within just as they had undermined the roman empire, Spanish, Germans, and Russians.
29. How? By the false promise of freedom from the formal(truth), physical (scarcity), behavioral(self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, kin selection), and evolutionary(genetic load, regression to the mean, natural selection, eugenic vs dysgenic) laws of the universe.
30. They cast Europeans as oppressors, not those that freed them from those laws by adapting to those laws – the only group that didn’t fail to pass through the Great Filter of the limits of cooperation in the division of labor: continuing natural selection by markets in all life.
31. Contrary to globalist(anti-nationalist) ambitions of the females, and those who fight for the female (dysgenic, devolutionary, non-adaptive) strategy -the wealthier we become the more genetically biased the least conformity and lowest-demand for it.(Scandinavian divergence).
32/33. To restore the equilibrium between male and female strategies; to reverse demographic degeneration; and to have an honest conversation about whether we continue our conflict or return to the European and founder tradition of small competing states under a weak federation we would need to:
a) Restore defamation – and under untestifiabilty and falsehood rather than harm.
b) Require all commercial speech to the public in matters public meet requirements for testimony (Testifiability).
c) Grant protection to political identity and political speech (as with religion).
34. And end the age of industrialized lying that consists in the postwar pseudoscientific religion of freedom from the formal, phsyical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws and the promise that there is any alternative to rule of law, and markets – especially markets for the production of commons: what we call republican, democratic, or participatory government.
35. And restore our traditional limit of conflict to truthful reciprocal speech in the production of exchanges in an association, cooperation, reproduction, production (goods services and information), commons (goods, services, information), and polities – the market for exchanges in the production of commons between the sexes, clans, classes, and yes, races.
35. And restore our traditional limit of conflict to truthful reciprocal speech in the production of exchanges in an association, cooperation, reproduction, production (goods services and information), commons (goods, services, information), and polities …
36. Because government serves as the market for exchanges in the production of commons between the sexes, clans, classes, and yes, races.
37. And without that market, and truthful reciprocal exchanges within it, all we do is resort to lies, false promises, gossiping and undermining – until we must eventually resort to violence. And, while there are many who fear it, there are enough who revel in the opportunity.
38. I should perhaps mention, that all mass media distributes mythos. Myths train the subconscious by suggestion(involuntary) – not declaration (voluntary), not open to self-audit. A mythos contains a narrative. That narrative contains a strategy. That strategy implies a paradigm.
39. That paradigm either is consistent with the laws of the universe – or it is not. As such, there are seditious myths and supportive myths. There are criminal myths and virtuous myths.
39.Without knowing the laws of the universe we can not regulate and reform a group’s strategy. Without knowing the European group’s strategy as a system of weights and measures for myths, one cannot regulate myths. Without knowing the system of weights and measures for truthful testimonial speech we cannot regulate speech. But we know each of them.
40 . There is only one condition under which the laws of the universe, the strategy and mythos, and truthful testifiable speech are consistent and coherent. And that’s called the germanic languages, the formal logics (math-identity, verbal-sets, operational-sequences), the physical laws (determinism, scarcity, entropy), …
41. … behavioral “natural” laws, and evolutionary laws (mutation, recombination, genetic load, regression to the mean, neotenic evolution, reproductive sortition, limited rotation, natural selection, and success or failure in the defeat of the red queen) …
41. … given our vast differences in distributions in sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, within and without of clans, classes, and races, given our demonstrated physical, social, cognitive, and extended phenotypical differences in appearance, behavior, and consequences. 41.
43. And given our different rates and depths of maturity (neoteny), distribution of sex differences in evaluation and cognition, distribution of consciousness, and distribution of intelligence. And perhaps importantly, the distribution of those talents within any group in which we can obtain an identity (membership) and the advantages and disadvantages therefrom.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev Ukraine
1. The pressures of Geographic, economic, organizing strategy (steppe herding) led proto Europeans to develop a universal, entrepreneurial (voluntary) militia (militarized society), and military reporting’. (See political economy of Sparta, Vikings and Pirates.
2. In such a political system, status was available by merit in empirical adversarial competition at high risk (raiding cattle).
3. And Europeans (uniquely) normatively institutionalized testimonial (empirical) speech (military reporting), and the resulting high ingroup trust.
4. There exist only three means of human coercion:force(military-state), reumuneration(commerce-law), and ostracization-undermining(normative society-religion): State+Law+Religion
5. The order of the development of those institutions causes all macro civilizational differences.
6. The rate of civilizational adaptation and innovation depends on the order of these institutions.
7. Europeans(uniquely) developed empirical Law of Tort(strong) > State(weak) > Religion (fail).
8. It’s the fastest evolutionary model for organizing humans that is possible, and produces the least divergence from the formal(logical), physical and logical laws of the universe.
9. This is why Fukuyama erred. And what frustrates Statists. European civ’s radical rate of evolution in bronze, iron, steel, and silicon ages, is due to continuous demand for status by discovering opportunity and by forcing the people to adapt to change. All others stagnate.
10. Tort Law continues natural selection, domestication, evolution without design or intention. European law(martial order) limited competition to cooperative market and conflict in court with judicially sanctioned Duel, Laws against Defamation, Gossips, and Shrills.
11. Political competition between many states creates a Pareto optimum of political organization (power).
12. Law (natural law of reciprocity by tort) creates a Pareto optimum of economic production.
13. Marriage creates a nash optimum between sexes in a (military) polity.
14. Males are physical superpredators(fast) and females social superpredators(slow). Limiting conflict to positive commercial market, and negative court(law) markets, was a compromise equally suppressing(domesticating) both male (violence) and female(undermining) strategies.
15. Ergo, women and men were EQUALLY domesticated by suppression of EACH of their evolutionary conflict strategies – if they affected the peace (economy, society, polity) – “Ordnung” – and especially retaliation cycles (feuds) and even more so, taxation.
16. All of these policies force behavioral adaptation (domestication) into the polity, norms, traditions, institutions, by directing dominance expression into voluntary markets (association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons production, polity production, and war.)
17. Domestication (evolutionary adaptation) under these (ancient) rules occurred by physical ostracization (a death sentence), land use ostracization (manorial), credit ostracization (socio-economic), harsh winters, and ‘genetic pacification’ by hanging (political and judicial).
18. Free speech was a controversial because they couldn’t demarcate(in court) Truth b/c of Faith(Church). They enacted under these traditions.
19. Traditions like group strategy and metaphysics are presumptions – they may not be known, articulated – and certainly not codified.
20. The evolutionary history of man consists of maximizing bodily, social, cognitive, and extended phenotype (tech) adaptation in time. That’s it. For example, IQ (g) is just a measure of cognitive adaptation in time.
21. So the extraordinary success of the European peoples in bronze, iron, coal-steel, and silicon-oil ages, is due to continuing maximization of human adaptation by minimization the difference between human behavior and the laws of the universe.
22. And Europeans disproportionately and overwhelmingly – aside from the conquest by supernatural religion in the dark ages – dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality and early death.
23. But this rapidity and its rewards for a small population on the edge of the agrarian & bronze age, comes at the cost of (a) adaptive stress. (b) market suppression of the reproduction of those demonstrably by failing in markets. (c) Christian love for masses to tolerate it.
24. Until 1950s mainstream reporters maintained military experience, discipline, duty, and testimonial speech, and full integration into what’s today called ‘Whiteness’.
25. “Whiteness” Ironically, means ‘Science”, which means not violating Tort against the Commons by warranty of ‘due diligence necessary for producing testimonial speech – free of ignorance, error, bias, loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, and deceit.”
26. Then the Frankfurt School moved into Columbia University and took advantage of (a) free speech (b) Christian tolerance, (c) the enlightenment false promise of an aristocracy of everyone, (d) the first gen. off the farm (e)a windfall economy (f)ignorance of our group strategy
27. The frankfurt school and the postmodernists, anti-male feminists, PC/Woke, anti-whiteness that followed, used the female group strategy of undermining and reputation destruction against the entirety of the western strategy, metaphysics, institutions, traditions, and norms.
28. Destroying from within what had taken five thousand years of evolution producing the proto-European, Hellenic, Roman, Germanic(HRE-Prussian), Anglo(Scandinavian)-American institutions from within just as they had undermined the roman empire, Spanish, Germans, and Russians.
29. How? By the false promise of freedom from the formal(truth), physical (scarcity), behavioral(self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, kin selection), and evolutionary(genetic load, regression to the mean, natural selection, eugenic vs dysgenic) laws of the universe.
30. They cast Europeans as oppressors, not those that freed them from those laws by adapting to those laws – the only group that didn’t fail to pass through the Great Filter of the limits of cooperation in the division of labor: continuing natural selection by markets in all life.
31. Contrary to globalist(anti-nationalist) ambitions of the females, and those who fight for the female (dysgenic, devolutionary, non-adaptive) strategy -the wealthier we become the more genetically biased the least conformity and lowest-demand for it.(Scandinavian divergence).
32/33. To restore the equilibrium between male and female strategies; to reverse demographic degeneration; and to have an honest conversation about whether we continue our conflict or return to the European and founder tradition of small competing states under a weak federation we would need to:
a) Restore defamation – and under untestifiabilty and falsehood rather than harm.
b) Require all commercial speech to the public in matters public meet requirements for testimony (Testifiability).
c) Grant protection to political identity and political speech (as with religion).
34. And end the age of industrialized lying that consists in the postwar pseudoscientific religion of freedom from the formal, phsyical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws and the promise that there is any alternative to rule of law, and markets – especially markets for the production of commons: what we call republican, democratic, or participatory government.
35. And restore our traditional limit of conflict to truthful reciprocal speech in the production of exchanges in an association, cooperation, reproduction, production (goods services and information), commons (goods, services, information), and polities – the market for exchanges in the production of commons between the sexes, clans, classes, and yes, races.
35. And restore our traditional limit of conflict to truthful reciprocal speech in the production of exchanges in an association, cooperation, reproduction, production (goods services and information), commons (goods, services, information), and polities …
36. Because government serves as the market for exchanges in the production of commons between the sexes, clans, classes, and yes, races.
37. And without that market, and truthful reciprocal exchanges within it, all we do is resort to lies, false promises, gossiping and undermining – until we must eventually resort to violence. And, while there are many who fear it, there are enough who revel in the opportunity.
38. I should perhaps mention, that all mass media distributes mythos. Myths train the subconscious by suggestion(involuntary) – not declaration (voluntary), not open to self-audit. A mythos contains a narrative. That narrative contains a strategy. That strategy implies a paradigm.
39. That paradigm either is consistent with the laws of the universe – or it is not. As such, there are seditious myths and supportive myths. There are criminal myths and virtuous myths.
39.Without knowing the laws of the universe we can not regulate and reform a group’s strategy. Without knowing the European group’s strategy as a system of weights and measures for myths, one cannot regulate myths. Without knowing the system of weights and measures for truthful testimonial speech we cannot regulate speech. But we know each of them.
40 . There is only one condition under which the laws of the universe, the strategy and mythos, and truthful testifiable speech are consistent and coherent. And that’s called the germanic languages, the formal logics (math-identity, verbal-sets, operational-sequences), the physical laws (determinism, scarcity, entropy), …
41. … behavioral “natural” laws, and evolutionary laws (mutation, recombination, genetic load, regression to the mean, neotenic evolution, reproductive sortition, limited rotation, natural selection, and success or failure in the defeat of the red queen) …
41. … given our vast differences in distributions in sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, within and without of clans, classes, and races, given our demonstrated physical, social, cognitive, and extended phenotypical differences in appearance, behavior, and consequences. 41.
43. And given our different rates and depths of maturity (neoteny), distribution of sex differences in evaluation and cognition, distribution of consciousness, and distribution of intelligence. And perhaps importantly, the distribution of those talents within any group in which we can obtain an identity (membership) and the advantages and disadvantages therefrom.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev Ukraine
Some argue that cultural Marxism is a silly term, but I think it works well. It describes a leveling desire that is no longer primarily interested in class, but it demographic groups. It sees society as a battle between races, sexes, and sexualities for power. – Bo Weingard
The Correct (And Only) Answer
Cultural Marxists(the Jews in the Frankfurt School), repeated their transformation of Judaism’s cultural institutionalization of the strategy of drug dealers, prostitutes, loan sharks, faith healers, and priesthoods: the false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe, in exchange for membership in a non-violent army, that together cooperates, under the plausible denial of physical non-aggression and plausible deniability of a divine religion, in mass organization of sedition, and fomenting sedition through evangelism, against informational, logical, habitual, normative, traditional, and institutional tools of organization, in a slow incremental battle against those that discover, adapt to, and apply those institutional rules.
They then transformed the Jewish Group strategy from an ethnic means of warfare against the productive peoples, into Christianity, which institutionalized their method of warfare against the Roman empire and European Reason, Law, Markets, and Tolerance. And accomplished nothing but a thousand-year dark age of ignorance and parasitism by the Jews themselves and the Organized Church that they invented.
Then, immediately upon their liberation from justified historical containment from and prosecution of their crimes by Europeans, they proceeded by transforming Judaism into Marxism, repeating the method of Christian sedition, by again transforming Marxism from fomenting an in-group economic battle between the GENETIC classes in a homogenous society falsely promising an alternative organization to merit (natural selection)
Then, immediately upon the failure of Marxism, and the horrors it produced, they transformed marxism into the cultural marxism of the Frankfurt School to foment an ingroup-outgroup battle between races, sexes, sexualities AGAINST homogenous societies, by again falsely promising an alternative to merit (natural selection).
Then upon the success of Cultural Marxism, Then they invented postmodernism .. power … lying because truth results in the natural laws of the universe.
pc, woke, explicity white political disempowerment by minority status, explicit anti-whiteness, explicit white replacement, white genocide
And just as drug dealers, prostitutes, loan sharks … they found a customer base to turn into clientelle (clientellism), a pulpit to preach from in university, media, and entertainment, and credit expansion to obscure the consequences, and that was to use the academy, media, advertising, … to remove the feedback loop, and to indoctrinate the first generation of the laboring class off the farm, and the first generation of women out of the household – both made possible by european discovery adaptation to and application of those laws… of the laws of the universe
The entire history of jewish thought from boaz, marx, freud … onward is a revolt against the industrial revolution that dilute their powers of localw persuasion and parasitism, against their regional poewrs of financial parasitism upon the poor, …
Reciprocity and Proportionality (Merit) = Eugenic: adversarial competition maintaining natural selection. Necessary for clan, tribe, nation, survival.
-vs-
Reciprocity and Equality (Non-Merit) = Dysgenic: social conformity maintaining stasis. Rise and Fall All.
The Jewish group strategy has been consistent for all of their recorded history, both pre-egyptian, egyptian, mosopotamian, levantine, roman, and during the diaspora:
The whole of the (Jewish) Left’s Postwar Program (Reverse Pogrom) is a revolt against Darwin and Malthus’ explanation of the success of the Western Tradition, using false-promise of freedom from scarcity, self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, kin preference, and genetic load, regression-2-mean, as a means of warfare against western civilization, that would deprive them of specialization in parasitism on the private and common by false promises of freedom from laws of nature.
So it’s not cultural marxism alone, it’s Islam Judaism, Marxism, Socialism, Cultural marxism, postmodernism, anti-male feminism, science denial, pc/woke, anti-white, anti-west.
Why? It’s not possible to compete given their <95 medians. It’s not possible to prey upon 105+ medians.
It’s not possible to argue against this framework. You can try. You must lie, and conspire to engage in sedition, treason, warfare, culture-cide, civilization-cide, and ethnic genocide to even try. Even trying to argue against it merely licenses warfare, culture-cide, civilization-cide, and ethnocide in response.
This is war. It’s total war. War against every market in western civilization: association, cooperation, production of goods, services, and information, reproduction, commons, trifunctional elites, trifunctionalism itself, polities, and warfare. It is a war against our first principle of self-determination, self-determined means, sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, and the rapid adaptivity … And we are the only fully market civilization, with the only rule of law, with the only trifunctional market between elites, with the only demand for truth-before-face, reciprocity and warranty, and the high trust innovative and adaptive prosperity and resulting harmony that results – at the cost of the preservation of natural selection by the constraint of the reproduction of the unproductive, and the Christian ethic of sacrificial care for those who natural markets, nature, and nature’s god have determined unfit to burden the rest of us by replication of their genes.
Only the west practices trifunctionalism in a competition between elites mediated by our natural law of self-determination, by sovereignty reciprocity, truth, and duty. With the failure of the catholic church to … …..
While there are four visions competing in the West: The Russian Martial Masculine Paternal Orthodox Authoritarian, The French State-Church Feminine Maternal Latin Authoritarian, The Anglo-Germanic Protestant Militial Paternal Rule of Law of Markets, and the Jewish Semitic Feminine Monopoly Authoritarian. All four of these visions persist in their group strategies that are thousands of years old. The Germans have abandoned their attempts at thought leadership and the formation of elites. And the Intermarium Slavic peoples have been unable to form elites without the Poles, who have been set back seventy years by the Soviets, and infantilized by EU membership, who must finish their maturity and take that leadership for it to succeed. The Russians have group strategy, but they are lying in wait, and don’t actively compete in the discourse, because they are justifiably untrustful of the jews for their crimes against the Russian and Ukrainian people, the germans for historical reasons – despite their natural interests in a cultural and economic alliance, and even more untrustful of Americans for our ‘nativity’, spreading of decadency, and suicide that they managed to painfully escape at the cost of a century and millions of dead.
As a contrast, the Chinese have chosen fascism – the ethnocentric military-industrial state, printing rather than borrowing money, markets and eugenics, not communism and the Jewish globalist financial or industrial state-run for peasants and the resulting dysgenia. The Indians maintain their ‘we are many, and kill we will them with kindness’ strategy but against China and Islam it will fail. So we will see India increasingly moving to decreased territorial, religious, and cultural, tolerance.
So there are only three sets of these elites in the west vying for power: The Jewish Female Authoritarian strategy of undermining, and continuing the rapid conquest of western civilization by incentivizing race, class, sex, cultural, informational conflict – and even logical conflict, and underclass invasion – repeating the fall of Rome, and their repetition in Bolshevik revolution and terrors, and German counter-revolution against it. The Semitic Roman Catholic and French Feminine Authoritarian strategy of state dominance, bloody terrors, and socialism leading to slow conquest of Europe by Islam. Or the European, Germanic, and Anglo continuation of our ancient rule of law repeating the otherwise unimaginable success of Europeans in the Bronze Age of pre-literate Indo-European expansion, the Iron Age Greek reason Roman administration and Roman peace – that dragged mankind out into reason and failed, and the European age of sail and steel’s that dragged mankind single-handedly, kicking and screaming all the while, out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vice of oppression between human tyranny and the vicissitudes of a nature, geology, climate, solar system, and universe all but hostile to the existence of life – and is on the verge of failure.
We have a choice between a future under the Jewish Muslim Semitic civilization of endemic lying, parasitism, stagnation, decline, and dysgenia – another dark age and the very real possibility of failing to pass through the Great Filter, or to continue the European Tradition and its high costs, and to transcend ourselves into the gods we imagine by continuing our long history of discovery, adaptation to, and application of, the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, nature, and nature’s god.
I have, and my organization has provided a peaceful means of settling this war between the masculine eugenic evolutionary and adaptive European elites that have been a boon to mankind, and the dysgenic devolutionary and maladaptive Semitic elites that have undermined roman elites, culture, rule of law, administration, destroyed its statues, monuments, temples, arts, letters, and knowledge, closed its schools of philosophy, exiled, or killed its teachers and philosophers, and doomed us to a dark age of superstition, ignorance, starvation, and decline. It’s principle features is to require truthful, meaning testifiable, warrantable, restitutable speech in public to the public, in matters public, and to criminalize false promise in the political sphere as we have only lightly criminalized false promise in the personal sphere – by defamation, and in the commercial sphere – by fraud. We provide analytic criteria for passing those tests that will survive in court. This will economically destroy sedition by politicians, bureaucrats, the academy, education, commentariat, media, entertainment, advertising, and marketing – and even more so in the underground sedition and parasitism of the financial sector, including the federal reserve, the ‘big banks’,
Yes, western civilization is the most demanding civilization to live in, but also the one with most freedom of opportunity because of those demands.
The choice is easy for those willing to pay the cost of adapting to ‘whiteness’ by full integration: our institutions merely reflect universal laws.
Those that cannot are welcome to return, or separate, but may not govern or rule or engage in sedition.
And those that choose to persist in the Semitic war against western civilization are the enemies of our people, of mankind, of nature, and nature’s god.
And in this judgment for their crimes, neither nature or nature’s god will reserve judgment.
The only choice is left to man.
I choose, we choose, the laws of nature and nature’s god, the laws of Western Civilization that the enemy disparages as “whiteness”.
Some argue that cultural Marxism is a silly term, but I think it works well. It describes a leveling desire that is no longer primarily interested in class, but it demographic groups. It sees society as a battle between races, sexes, and sexualities for power. – Bo Weingard
The Correct (And Only) Answer
Cultural Marxists(the Jews in the Frankfurt School), repeated their transformation of Judaism’s cultural institutionalization of the strategy of drug dealers, prostitutes, loan sharks, faith healers, and priesthoods: the false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe, in exchange for membership in a non-violent army, that together cooperates, under the plausible denial of physical non-aggression and plausible deniability of a divine religion, in mass organization of sedition, and fomenting sedition through evangelism, against informational, logical, habitual, normative, traditional, and institutional tools of organization, in a slow incremental battle against those that discover, adapt to, and apply those institutional rules.
They then transformed the Jewish Group strategy from an ethnic means of warfare against the productive peoples, into Christianity, which institutionalized their method of warfare against the Roman empire and European Reason, Law, Markets, and Tolerance. And accomplished nothing but a thousand-year dark age of ignorance and parasitism by the Jews themselves and the Organized Church that they invented.
Then, immediately upon their liberation from justified historical containment from and prosecution of their crimes by Europeans, they proceeded by transforming Judaism into Marxism, repeating the method of Christian sedition, by again transforming Marxism from fomenting an in-group economic battle between the GENETIC classes in a homogenous society falsely promising an alternative organization to merit (natural selection)
Then, immediately upon the failure of Marxism, and the horrors it produced, they transformed marxism into the cultural marxism of the Frankfurt School to foment an ingroup-outgroup battle between races, sexes, sexualities AGAINST homogenous societies, by again falsely promising an alternative to merit (natural selection).
Then upon the success of Cultural Marxism, Then they invented postmodernism .. power … lying because truth results in the natural laws of the universe.
pc, woke, explicity white political disempowerment by minority status, explicit anti-whiteness, explicit white replacement, white genocide
And just as drug dealers, prostitutes, loan sharks … they found a customer base to turn into clientelle (clientellism), a pulpit to preach from in university, media, and entertainment, and credit expansion to obscure the consequences, and that was to use the academy, media, advertising, … to remove the feedback loop, and to indoctrinate the first generation of the laboring class off the farm, and the first generation of women out of the household – both made possible by european discovery adaptation to and application of those laws… of the laws of the universe
The entire history of jewish thought from boaz, marx, freud … onward is a revolt against the industrial revolution that dilute their powers of localw persuasion and parasitism, against their regional poewrs of financial parasitism upon the poor, …
Reciprocity and Proportionality (Merit) = Eugenic: adversarial competition maintaining natural selection. Necessary for clan, tribe, nation, survival.
-vs-
Reciprocity and Equality (Non-Merit) = Dysgenic: social conformity maintaining stasis. Rise and Fall All.
The Jewish group strategy has been consistent for all of their recorded history, both pre-egyptian, egyptian, mosopotamian, levantine, roman, and during the diaspora:
The whole of the (Jewish) Left’s Postwar Program (Reverse Pogrom) is a revolt against Darwin and Malthus’ explanation of the success of the Western Tradition, using false-promise of freedom from scarcity, self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, kin preference, and genetic load, regression-2-mean, as a means of warfare against western civilization, that would deprive them of specialization in parasitism on the private and common by false promises of freedom from laws of nature.
So it’s not cultural marxism alone, it’s Islam Judaism, Marxism, Socialism, Cultural marxism, postmodernism, anti-male feminism, science denial, pc/woke, anti-white, anti-west.
Why? It’s not possible to compete given their <95 medians. It’s not possible to prey upon 105+ medians.
It’s not possible to argue against this framework. You can try. You must lie, and conspire to engage in sedition, treason, warfare, culture-cide, civilization-cide, and ethnic genocide to even try. Even trying to argue against it merely licenses warfare, culture-cide, civilization-cide, and ethnocide in response.
This is war. It’s total war. War against every market in western civilization: association, cooperation, production of goods, services, and information, reproduction, commons, trifunctional elites, trifunctionalism itself, polities, and warfare. It is a war against our first principle of self-determination, self-determined means, sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, and the rapid adaptivity … And we are the only fully market civilization, with the only rule of law, with the only trifunctional market between elites, with the only demand for truth-before-face, reciprocity and warranty, and the high trust innovative and adaptive prosperity and resulting harmony that results – at the cost of the preservation of natural selection by the constraint of the reproduction of the unproductive, and the Christian ethic of sacrificial care for those who natural markets, nature, and nature’s god have determined unfit to burden the rest of us by replication of their genes.
Only the west practices trifunctionalism in a competition between elites mediated by our natural law of self-determination, by sovereignty reciprocity, truth, and duty. With the failure of the catholic church to … …..
While there are four visions competing in the West: The Russian Martial Masculine Paternal Orthodox Authoritarian, The French State-Church Feminine Maternal Latin Authoritarian, The Anglo-Germanic Protestant Militial Paternal Rule of Law of Markets, and the Jewish Semitic Feminine Monopoly Authoritarian. All four of these visions persist in their group strategies that are thousands of years old. The Germans have abandoned their attempts at thought leadership and the formation of elites. And the Intermarium Slavic peoples have been unable to form elites without the Poles, who have been set back seventy years by the Soviets, and infantilized by EU membership, who must finish their maturity and take that leadership for it to succeed. The Russians have group strategy, but they are lying in wait, and don’t actively compete in the discourse, because they are justifiably untrustful of the jews for their crimes against the Russian and Ukrainian people, the germans for historical reasons – despite their natural interests in a cultural and economic alliance, and even more untrustful of Americans for our ‘nativity’, spreading of decadency, and suicide that they managed to painfully escape at the cost of a century and millions of dead.
As a contrast, the Chinese have chosen fascism – the ethnocentric military-industrial state, printing rather than borrowing money, markets and eugenics, not communism and the Jewish globalist financial or industrial state-run for peasants and the resulting dysgenia. The Indians maintain their ‘we are many, and kill we will them with kindness’ strategy but against China and Islam it will fail. So we will see India increasingly moving to decreased territorial, religious, and cultural, tolerance.
So there are only three sets of these elites in the west vying for power: The Jewish Female Authoritarian strategy of undermining, and continuing the rapid conquest of western civilization by incentivizing race, class, sex, cultural, informational conflict – and even logical conflict, and underclass invasion – repeating the fall of Rome, and their repetition in Bolshevik revolution and terrors, and German counter-revolution against it. The Semitic Roman Catholic and French Feminine Authoritarian strategy of state dominance, bloody terrors, and socialism leading to slow conquest of Europe by Islam. Or the European, Germanic, and Anglo continuation of our ancient rule of law repeating the otherwise unimaginable success of Europeans in the Bronze Age of pre-literate Indo-European expansion, the Iron Age Greek reason Roman administration and Roman peace – that dragged mankind out into reason and failed, and the European age of sail and steel’s that dragged mankind single-handedly, kicking and screaming all the while, out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vice of oppression between human tyranny and the vicissitudes of a nature, geology, climate, solar system, and universe all but hostile to the existence of life – and is on the verge of failure.
We have a choice between a future under the Jewish Muslim Semitic civilization of endemic lying, parasitism, stagnation, decline, and dysgenia – another dark age and the very real possibility of failing to pass through the Great Filter, or to continue the European Tradition and its high costs, and to transcend ourselves into the gods we imagine by continuing our long history of discovery, adaptation to, and application of, the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, nature, and nature’s god.
I have, and my organization has provided a peaceful means of settling this war between the masculine eugenic evolutionary and adaptive European elites that have been a boon to mankind, and the dysgenic devolutionary and maladaptive Semitic elites that have undermined roman elites, culture, rule of law, administration, destroyed its statues, monuments, temples, arts, letters, and knowledge, closed its schools of philosophy, exiled, or killed its teachers and philosophers, and doomed us to a dark age of superstition, ignorance, starvation, and decline. It’s principle features is to require truthful, meaning testifiable, warrantable, restitutable speech in public to the public, in matters public, and to criminalize false promise in the political sphere as we have only lightly criminalized false promise in the personal sphere – by defamation, and in the commercial sphere – by fraud. We provide analytic criteria for passing those tests that will survive in court. This will economically destroy sedition by politicians, bureaucrats, the academy, education, commentariat, media, entertainment, advertising, and marketing – and even more so in the underground sedition and parasitism of the financial sector, including the federal reserve, the ‘big banks’,
Yes, western civilization is the most demanding civilization to live in, but also the one with most freedom of opportunity because of those demands.
The choice is easy for those willing to pay the cost of adapting to ‘whiteness’ by full integration: our institutions merely reflect universal laws.
Those that cannot are welcome to return, or separate, but may not govern or rule or engage in sedition.
And those that choose to persist in the Semitic war against western civilization are the enemies of our people, of mankind, of nature, and nature’s god.
And in this judgment for their crimes, neither nature or nature’s god will reserve judgment.
The only choice is left to man.
I choose, we choose, the laws of nature and nature’s god, the laws of Western Civilization that the enemy disparages as “whiteness”.
Brittany Wallman @BrittanyWallman Investigative reporter @SunSentinel
*2019 Pulitzer team* Mom, wife, churchgoer, runner (@Oiselle Volée) @UFJschool Raised in Iowa & Okla. Ukulele student
I’m a journalist trying to reach you. bwallman@sunsentinel.com 954 356 4541
Fri 8:06 AM
Hi Brittany, Please tell me the topic or message a list of questions here and I’ll give you a call. (Browsing your feed suggests we’d agree on many things but one never knows, and while I want to solve the problems of our age, the public discourse is too poisoned for adult discourse, and my work in scientific method, law and economics, group strategies, and politics is intellectually challenging in the best of environments – and we aren’t in one of those. We don’t live in an age like that of the founders. 😉 ) -Cheers
Fri 9:28 AM
Great! We are writing about The Sovereign American Project, which is newly incorporated here in South Florida by Noah Revoy, Matt Lawlor and Nate Major. It looks like you and Propertarian Institute incubated it, in a sense. I want to talk to you about the Sovereign American project, curious if you have any relationship to it other than being like minded and close with Noah et al. Seeking your thoughts and comments on what we can expect from groups like SAP. What are their intentions? How do we interpret their presence in light of what happened in D.C., etc? Also wanted to know your relationship with Doolittle Institute here in Fla.
My cell is 954 531 2171
Fri 10:19 AM
Call you this afternoon. -hugs
Fri 11:58 AM
Superb ! if you can let me know what time, I will make sure I’m not tied up. Regardless, I’ll hop on call with you whenever you make yourself available. Thanks!
Fri 12:59 PM
I didn’t hear from you and with the time difference (are you in Kiev?) maybe I won’t for a bit. Experts here are saying that the Sovereign American Project’s ties to Russia, through YOU, are alarming. Is there cause for alarm? Are you helping Russia undermine the U.S. via the white supremacy movement?
Fri 7:03 PM
Can you help us understand and address the fears related to the emergence of The Sovereign American Project?
Fri 7:04 PM
Sorry. My fault. Minor family crisis took my attention. It’s too late to call so I’ll answer here thoroughly in text and we can talk more tomorrow if you’d like – although I think, as usual, this should be thorough.
1) There are a lot of rumors about me. Rumors develop a life of their own. It try to be very transparent in order to quash them but right-wing lower classes have been traumatized for so long that they use paranoia and conspiracy theory to gain some sense of mindfulness. I have a business in Ukraine because developers there cost 1/5 of what they do in America – and 100x more appreciative of it than Americans. Prior to working on the Institute nearly full time I was a serial tech entrepreneur and I have done business all around the world, owning companies across western countries. After my second bout of cancer I just wanted to get away from running a stressful business, a horrible divorce because of that stress and illness, and get away from the hate-filled environment in the states and Ukraine is still a traditional society. It just turned out that the revolution happened while I was there.
2) Regarding ‘Russia’ or ‘China’ or ‘Israel’ or ‘Islam’ or France for that matter, or any other outside force with usual outside geostrategic interests in undermining the American remains of the British empire that has overextended itself militarily, politically, and economically. What kind of delusion would someone have to live under that thinks there is a “We” in America rather than two sets of highly incompatible people forced to live under the same government, when that government isn’t, as the founders intended, limited to defense, trade, trade disputes between the states, and a guarantee of republican government? What evidence is there that the right and left can compromise on anything whatsoever? We ended integration into the western intellectual, social, political, legal, and historical model and without it we followed our natural incentives and we naturally divided along the female reproductive, moral, and cognitive bias of the left and the male reproductive, moral, and cognitive bias of the right. This is what we see in every advanced country that has achieved any degree of gender equality of opportunity – men and women move MORE to stereotypical behaviors and preferences not less. That’s what’s happening here in the states at great scale because we are a country of great scale – not 5M or 10m ethnically homogenous protestant Northern Europeans. This is well known in the literature of social science, psychology, and genetics. It’s inescapable natural human behavior let loose by the industrial revolution, the slow replacement of agrarian norms, massive immigration, and . So I just think people who pull foreign interference out of a magic hat live under the delusion that their moral and cognitive biases are ‘right or true or just’ and that the other side is wrong when these choices are evolutionary and genetic origins and expressions of profound consequence that don’t need any foreign influence. So I view questions of foreign interference as sticking our heads in the sand in order to pretend the enormous elephants in the room. In other words even thinking such nonsense removes one from the possibility of adult conversation on the great problems of our age – that every other continental empire has faced since empires came into existence. We are becoming the middle east, south america, becuase without ethinc homogeneity we cannot become India or china, and without western rule of law of reciprocity and Christian morality charity an civil society to tolerate that rule of law, and the markets, and natural eugenics that suppress the reproduction of those unfit to compete in them that result from those markets, we cannot even become Europe. We must become south America or the middle east. This is just the boring uninspiring scientific reality.
3) I am a ‘constitutional fundamentalist’, or a rule of law of natural law fundamentalist just like the founders. There is almost no difference between my work, the work of Adams and Jefferson other than I have the luxury of greater understanding of formal logic, and the eight failings of the original constitution that would defend it from pseudoscience, sophistry, contrivance, and deceit, thanks to having been part of the first wave of mainstream revolutions in computer science.I have a massive and technical corpus of work that documents my entire project of legal and economic reforms so that we can peacefully separate because of this inescapable reality. Europe, India, China, and the middle east have each gone through multiple iterations of the same problem for all of recorded history. So my work is in public, and working in public instead of in journals was part of my intellectual experiment: could it be done? Would people be interested? Did we still need to work in the academy? Well, our ancestors didn’t, and it turns out we don’t, and the public is a willing participant in psychological and sociological experimentation on them if you run that experiment as a ‘game’. The technique I used to do that is also documented on my site ‘King of the Hill Games”. So everything I do is in public, and is all publicly available and anyone can read. So instead of having to read my ‘notes’ like most intellectuals, my ‘notes’ are posted for later public explanation of how I worked through a series of very hard problems that troubled the great minds of the twentieth century in the scientific method, truth, and the formal logic of law and jurisprudence.
5) My reading of history, world demographics, world economics, like many other thought leaders in geostrategy, geoeconomics, and political theory, has been, since perhaps 1990, but certainly since I started writing in 2004, that we would have a world shift in economic and strategic power, a civil war, and perhaps a world war to seize opportunity somewhere between 2019 and 2023. So far I’m as accurate in my strategic predictions as I have been in my economic predictions – because demographics is destiny. So my decade long project to find a solution so that we can settle our differences by separation as the founders originally intended, and the restoration of political, economic, social, family, and behavioral policy to the states, so that we can, as Europeans have, continue to adapt politics, economics, and commons to differences in genetic and cultural preerence. My strategy, which annoys the FBI, is that I believe given the capture of our institutions, and media, that it’s impossible to have this discussion without public awareness of the certainty of this coming civil war, and that the conservatives must create a credible threat of this civil war breaking out (just as BLM and Antifa have done). My goal was to organize that gathering and focus the dialog on solutions that are mutually beneficial rather than escalating conflict that will end in bloodshed on a scale that hasn’t been seen since the fall of the Roman Empire. And unfortunately, when I tried, the right – overpopulated by angry resentful idiots turned on me, my partner, and my organization and made that impossible. That hasn’t stopped me from doing my intellectual program but it has convinced me that at this point the political opportunity for settlement has passed, and that horrible civil war that has been bubbling for decades will now spill out into daily life across the country and it will be unstoppable because it will gain momentum with every act and every retaliation for every action. So I consider our efforts to direct the frustration of half the population to political solution by open public discourse failed, and my only hope is that if better minds somehow prevail in a world without people the caliber of our founders, that my work will be useful in framing options.
4) My constitutional proposed reforms are available on propertarianism.com > main menu > Reforms at different levels of completion as I work through the process in public for any who are interested to see. It copies the founders’ organization by the declaration, preamble, and constitution, and most innovations are technical such as defining rights by strict construction from reciprocity, and so like most legal theory, it is unsuitable for mass consumption. I originally wrote these under the assumption that a credible threat was necessary. But the public knows now. They may not be talking about it yet, but we all feel it. The Overton Window of our incompatibility and the impossibility of resolution of our differences has moved into the mainstream.
5) I didn’t know about the sovereign American project until you contacted me. It’s offline now. But I could view it via cached pages at Archive.org. The site looks like a very clear and deliberate application of my work, in an attempt to make it publicly digestible and politically actionable. I made a few phone calls and my understanding is that these are people who have followed me for a long time and want to again to make a political movement out by applying my work. So it looks like while I have no faith any longer that a solution to our present crisis is possible, others haven’t.
But if anyone thinks the USA is special, and can fill a continent with a culturally heterogeneous population that matures at different rates, with different demographic distributions, with different group evolutionary strategies, and different moral and therefore political instincts, they are clearly unfit to hold opinions on much of anything. As historian Will Durant said so elegantly, in his study of religion and philosophy he found no answers there. Those answers are in history. History is the evidence of man rolled up for all of us to see.” And those of us who know history are doomed to suffer the follies of those who don’t.
That doesn’t mean I won’t keep trying to do my small part and save us from the coming tragedy.
-Cheers
-Curt
Thank you for this! It leaves me wondering, is it accurate to say Sovereign American Project, based on your ideas, supports peaceful separation of whites and non-whites? If so I wonder what you and SAP think of what happened at the Capitol on Jan 6? The SAP team was in DC that day acc to their Tweet – would they have been party to violence or invading the Capitol? I’m still digesting your ideology but given current events I have to wonder if your ideological “students” would be in the crowd with the Trump “stop the steal” folks and would resort to brute force to achieve their ends? Also I interpret your response to be saying the idea you are a Russian asset is “nonsense” and a distraction from America’s true problems which lie within. Correct?
Yesterday, 7:40 AM
Also there is an allegation that Richard Nikoley has a Dept of Defense IP address. He declined to respond to me about it. The accusation is this gives Sovereign American access to classified info.
Yesterday, 7:45 AM
And there was an allegation of connection to US military through you and the Doolittle Institute in Fla. We don’t see a connection between you and this institute- are we wrong?
Yesterday, 7:46 AM
Would your “disciples,” shall we say, be justified in violence on Wednesday to prevent Biden from being inaugurated?
Yesterday, 10:10 AM
No reporter would use this language. You represented yourself as a reporter. Religions have disciples, Ideologies have advocates. Scientists have promoters. I do science. That’s why it’s so disagreeable to everyone around the political compass because it exposes everyone’s tribal ideological, and religious lies.
I can only tell you what I’ve read online and the SAP looks like a fair representation of some of my work suitable for popular consumption because the technical aspects are left out.
My work and the SAP reflection of it is specific in that we must separate by political preference because political preferences are reflections of genetic demand for different norms, commons, and institutions. So if some people want racially homogenous polities and others want ideologically or religiously homogenous polities then that’s fine. Because it creates a market for different polities and that market is the reason for european success over all the rest in the bronze, iron, and steel ages. Markets calculate. The more calculation the better.
I compare one event by conservatives at the capitol where one person was hurt on each side, because 75M+ people honestly believe the left stole the election, and that this is just another in the 70 year project to destroy western civilization from within as a rational reaction by an oppressed people. I practice European reciprocal and universal ethics, so I compare it with a year of being terrorized, subject to random violence, days on end of riots, looting, fires, and attacks on police and government offices by democratic party advocates, BLM and Antifa – a non-event. Because both sides are showing how close we are to a civil war.
So if your tribe can resort to violence and insurrection for a year without any political push back, and by being justified by the press why should I care about one event that was timid compared to every one of the left’s events. But that’s because I’m an adult using universalist ethics.
My policy and recommendation is that we must separate as the founders intended, into states, that determine their political, social, economic operation and goals. That’s what the constitution promised us. And that’s what I advocate for.
Yesterday, 1:31 PM
I’ve never heard of the Doolittle whatever in Florida until you mentioned it. It’s named after general jimmy doolittle who bombed tokyo and then reformed the military industrial complex under Eisenhower. We are all related because we are a small family from puritan founders of the Boston and New Haven colonies. And Doolittle is an anglicization of norman Dolietta – producing a lot of Do and Du variants.
Richard Nikoley was an early follower but really not a practitioner of the formal logic of natural law that I teach. He tried to get involved but he wasn’t a fit for the technical nature of our work. I think he was a career navy guy if I remember.
Yesterday, 1:35 PM
Now, to be honest with you so that you have less incentive to fantasize and invent connections that don’t exist.
I’m a very competent person. In multiple fields. If I want to start a revolution in the USA I would just put out a half dozen videos by email to explain how it’s done, and how to win, and why it will succeed, and they would spread from person to person virally in minutes.
My objective – which you ignore – is to prevent that war by devolving the federal powers to the States, and maintaining a federal government as the founders designed it, and as the holy roman empire of the greater european peoples survived for over a thousand years.
Yesterday, 1:39 PM
Now I have answered your questions honestly and thoroughly despite your lack of professional candor. I don’t really believe you’re a journalist. You might be some kind of independent gossip seller. But a journalist reports. that’s not what you’re doing.
If you doubt that I am a news reporter, just Google. You will readily see my work. This is reporting – I am going to the original sources – not using second or third-hand info. And I very much appreciate that you are communicating with me. I am working with
@MegsNewz (she and I constitute the investigations team) and @inaminorkey
Yesterday, 1:50 PM
I’m not ignoring your ideas or comments. As a reporter it is my duty to get your response to the allegations. I can’t simply take your ideas and extrapolate answers myself. I don’t want to assume anything.
Yesterday, 1:52 PM
Thank you for this – I will read and ponder on it.
Yesterday, 1:55 PM
My email is bwallman@sunsentinel.com by the way
Yesterday, 2:12 PM
Disciple: a follower or student of a teacher, leader, or philosopher. In using that term I was viewing you as the teacher/leader/philosopher. And the folks at SAP as carrying your ideas. I think that agrees with what you said – even if you were offended by that term.
Yesterday, 2:16 PM
I am extremely sensitive to intellectual dishonesty and the leftist method of deception. It’s one of the core aspects of my work. You chose those terms from the field of terms because it suited you. I’m not offended other than I am jealous of my time. So, fine. I’ll take you at face value. Let’s move on.
Contacted today by one of the team that says they were unaware that I was unaware of them.
Yesterday, 6:11 PM
My understanding is that the entire conservative infrastructure is moving off of leftist owned and financed into conservative owned and financed hosting. And that this is the reason they are offline. Taking it offline makes no sense to me but I don’t have insight.
Yesterday, 6:20 PM
Hello. We’ll be putting a story together today. Noah and the others declined to cooperate for the story. FYI.
11:13 AM
They’re just paranoid because they believe you’ll just smear them with popular tropes, cast them as violent rather than protesters, cast them as hating rather than seeking peaceful separation, and not take what they say on the site at face value. We all started out as libertarians. John Mark approached me in the fall of 18 with the idea we might popularize my work by appealing to the disenfranchised right because they’re an angry mob that we hoped to turn into an organized political body. “organize a disorganized polity” but it’s impossible. They’re a leaderless, angry, economically and politically ostracized mob, traumatized by the destruction of their history, traditions, religion, and culture, and a disorganize mob of an army lacking thought leaders, group leaders, and enough worldly experience to act on their own. Too much macho, not enough discipline, too evangelical on one and, or too militant on the other.
Like I said and like I told the FBI. This civil war has turned from warm to hot and is beyond leaders now. At least trump provided hope. So now it’s going to devolve into chaos on both sides.
We are impossibly divided by impossible differences.
The story posted – I think we gave it an honest assessment. Thanks for the communications.
Yesterday, 5:48 PM
As expected. You cast it as a supremacist organization pent on violence rather than a political organization seeking to avoid our continuous march into violence, by suggesting we should restore the original constitution as an alliance of states with different cultures according to the preferences and needs of the peoples of different regions and localities.
There are no countries that are governable of this scale, and all such attempts at empire (china, india, middle east) result in state failure, legal failure, or developmental failure. and they are easily conquerd externally.
This is why ‘those of us who understand history, economy, demographics, and genetics are doomed to suffer the ignorance of those who dont’.
I don’t believe you could have done better. The truth would have served as advertising not news. It would have failed to fit the newspaper’s brand narrative. And it would have failed to satisfy the editor’s interest in your story. And your interest in income from it.
This is ‘why we can’t have nice things’. We can’t speak the truth because only lies that produce moral outrage, and virtue signal spirals that together generate moral panic, abandonment of reason, and demand for continued conflict.
You didn’t lie. Which is a good thing. You didn’t attack me. that’s a good thing. So for that I”m grateful.
Thank you and good luck.
(LAST CONTACT. NO FURTHER RESPONSE.)
Brittany Wallman @BrittanyWallman Investigative reporter @SunSentinel
*2019 Pulitzer team* Mom, wife, churchgoer, runner (@Oiselle Volée) @UFJschool Raised in Iowa & Okla. Ukulele student
I’m a journalist trying to reach you. bwallman@sunsentinel.com 954 356 4541
Fri 8:06 AM
Hi Brittany, Please tell me the topic or message a list of questions here and I’ll give you a call. (Browsing your feed suggests we’d agree on many things but one never knows, and while I want to solve the problems of our age, the public discourse is too poisoned for adult discourse, and my work in scientific method, law and economics, group strategies, and politics is intellectually challenging in the best of environments – and we aren’t in one of those. We don’t live in an age like that of the founders. 😉 ) -Cheers
Fri 9:28 AM
Great! We are writing about The Sovereign American Project, which is newly incorporated here in South Florida by Noah Revoy, Matt Lawlor and Nate Major. It looks like you and Propertarian Institute incubated it, in a sense. I want to talk to you about the Sovereign American project, curious if you have any relationship to it other than being like minded and close with Noah et al. Seeking your thoughts and comments on what we can expect from groups like SAP. What are their intentions? How do we interpret their presence in light of what happened in D.C., etc? Also wanted to know your relationship with Doolittle Institute here in Fla.
My cell is 954 531 2171
Fri 10:19 AM
Call you this afternoon. -hugs
Fri 11:58 AM
Superb ! if you can let me know what time, I will make sure I’m not tied up. Regardless, I’ll hop on call with you whenever you make yourself available. Thanks!
Fri 12:59 PM
I didn’t hear from you and with the time difference (are you in Kiev?) maybe I won’t for a bit. Experts here are saying that the Sovereign American Project’s ties to Russia, through YOU, are alarming. Is there cause for alarm? Are you helping Russia undermine the U.S. via the white supremacy movement?
Fri 7:03 PM
Can you help us understand and address the fears related to the emergence of The Sovereign American Project?
Fri 7:04 PM
Sorry. My fault. Minor family crisis took my attention. It’s too late to call so I’ll answer here thoroughly in text and we can talk more tomorrow if you’d like – although I think, as usual, this should be thorough.
1) There are a lot of rumors about me. Rumors develop a life of their own. It try to be very transparent in order to quash them but right-wing lower classes have been traumatized for so long that they use paranoia and conspiracy theory to gain some sense of mindfulness. I have a business in Ukraine because developers there cost 1/5 of what they do in America – and 100x more appreciative of it than Americans. Prior to working on the Institute nearly full time I was a serial tech entrepreneur and I have done business all around the world, owning companies across western countries. After my second bout of cancer I just wanted to get away from running a stressful business, a horrible divorce because of that stress and illness, and get away from the hate-filled environment in the states and Ukraine is still a traditional society. It just turned out that the revolution happened while I was there.
2) Regarding ‘Russia’ or ‘China’ or ‘Israel’ or ‘Islam’ or France for that matter, or any other outside force with usual outside geostrategic interests in undermining the American remains of the British empire that has overextended itself militarily, politically, and economically. What kind of delusion would someone have to live under that thinks there is a “We” in America rather than two sets of highly incompatible people forced to live under the same government, when that government isn’t, as the founders intended, limited to defense, trade, trade disputes between the states, and a guarantee of republican government? What evidence is there that the right and left can compromise on anything whatsoever? We ended integration into the western intellectual, social, political, legal, and historical model and without it we followed our natural incentives and we naturally divided along the female reproductive, moral, and cognitive bias of the left and the male reproductive, moral, and cognitive bias of the right. This is what we see in every advanced country that has achieved any degree of gender equality of opportunity – men and women move MORE to stereotypical behaviors and preferences not less. That’s what’s happening here in the states at great scale because we are a country of great scale – not 5M or 10m ethnically homogenous protestant Northern Europeans. This is well known in the literature of social science, psychology, and genetics. It’s inescapable natural human behavior let loose by the industrial revolution, the slow replacement of agrarian norms, massive immigration, and . So I just think people who pull foreign interference out of a magic hat live under the delusion that their moral and cognitive biases are ‘right or true or just’ and that the other side is wrong when these choices are evolutionary and genetic origins and expressions of profound consequence that don’t need any foreign influence. So I view questions of foreign interference as sticking our heads in the sand in order to pretend the enormous elephants in the room. In other words even thinking such nonsense removes one from the possibility of adult conversation on the great problems of our age – that every other continental empire has faced since empires came into existence. We are becoming the middle east, south america, becuase without ethinc homogeneity we cannot become India or china, and without western rule of law of reciprocity and Christian morality charity an civil society to tolerate that rule of law, and the markets, and natural eugenics that suppress the reproduction of those unfit to compete in them that result from those markets, we cannot even become Europe. We must become south America or the middle east. This is just the boring uninspiring scientific reality.
3) I am a ‘constitutional fundamentalist’, or a rule of law of natural law fundamentalist just like the founders. There is almost no difference between my work, the work of Adams and Jefferson other than I have the luxury of greater understanding of formal logic, and the eight failings of the original constitution that would defend it from pseudoscience, sophistry, contrivance, and deceit, thanks to having been part of the first wave of mainstream revolutions in computer science.I have a massive and technical corpus of work that documents my entire project of legal and economic reforms so that we can peacefully separate because of this inescapable reality. Europe, India, China, and the middle east have each gone through multiple iterations of the same problem for all of recorded history. So my work is in public, and working in public instead of in journals was part of my intellectual experiment: could it be done? Would people be interested? Did we still need to work in the academy? Well, our ancestors didn’t, and it turns out we don’t, and the public is a willing participant in psychological and sociological experimentation on them if you run that experiment as a ‘game’. The technique I used to do that is also documented on my site ‘King of the Hill Games”. So everything I do is in public, and is all publicly available and anyone can read. So instead of having to read my ‘notes’ like most intellectuals, my ‘notes’ are posted for later public explanation of how I worked through a series of very hard problems that troubled the great minds of the twentieth century in the scientific method, truth, and the formal logic of law and jurisprudence.
5) My reading of history, world demographics, world economics, like many other thought leaders in geostrategy, geoeconomics, and political theory, has been, since perhaps 1990, but certainly since I started writing in 2004, that we would have a world shift in economic and strategic power, a civil war, and perhaps a world war to seize opportunity somewhere between 2019 and 2023. So far I’m as accurate in my strategic predictions as I have been in my economic predictions – because demographics is destiny. So my decade long project to find a solution so that we can settle our differences by separation as the founders originally intended, and the restoration of political, economic, social, family, and behavioral policy to the states, so that we can, as Europeans have, continue to adapt politics, economics, and commons to differences in genetic and cultural preerence. My strategy, which annoys the FBI, is that I believe given the capture of our institutions, and media, that it’s impossible to have this discussion without public awareness of the certainty of this coming civil war, and that the conservatives must create a credible threat of this civil war breaking out (just as BLM and Antifa have done). My goal was to organize that gathering and focus the dialog on solutions that are mutually beneficial rather than escalating conflict that will end in bloodshed on a scale that hasn’t been seen since the fall of the Roman Empire. And unfortunately, when I tried, the right – overpopulated by angry resentful idiots turned on me, my partner, and my organization and made that impossible. That hasn’t stopped me from doing my intellectual program but it has convinced me that at this point the political opportunity for settlement has passed, and that horrible civil war that has been bubbling for decades will now spill out into daily life across the country and it will be unstoppable because it will gain momentum with every act and every retaliation for every action. So I consider our efforts to direct the frustration of half the population to political solution by open public discourse failed, and my only hope is that if better minds somehow prevail in a world without people the caliber of our founders, that my work will be useful in framing options.
4) My constitutional proposed reforms are available on propertarianism.com > main menu > Reforms at different levels of completion as I work through the process in public for any who are interested to see. It copies the founders’ organization by the declaration, preamble, and constitution, and most innovations are technical such as defining rights by strict construction from reciprocity, and so like most legal theory, it is unsuitable for mass consumption. I originally wrote these under the assumption that a credible threat was necessary. But the public knows now. They may not be talking about it yet, but we all feel it. The Overton Window of our incompatibility and the impossibility of resolution of our differences has moved into the mainstream.
5) I didn’t know about the sovereign American project until you contacted me. It’s offline now. But I could view it via cached pages at Archive.org. The site looks like a very clear and deliberate application of my work, in an attempt to make it publicly digestible and politically actionable. I made a few phone calls and my understanding is that these are people who have followed me for a long time and want to again to make a political movement out by applying my work. So it looks like while I have no faith any longer that a solution to our present crisis is possible, others haven’t.
But if anyone thinks the USA is special, and can fill a continent with a culturally heterogeneous population that matures at different rates, with different demographic distributions, with different group evolutionary strategies, and different moral and therefore political instincts, they are clearly unfit to hold opinions on much of anything. As historian Will Durant said so elegantly, in his study of religion and philosophy he found no answers there. Those answers are in history. History is the evidence of man rolled up for all of us to see.” And those of us who know history are doomed to suffer the follies of those who don’t.
That doesn’t mean I won’t keep trying to do my small part and save us from the coming tragedy.
-Cheers
-Curt
Thank you for this! It leaves me wondering, is it accurate to say Sovereign American Project, based on your ideas, supports peaceful separation of whites and non-whites? If so I wonder what you and SAP think of what happened at the Capitol on Jan 6? The SAP team was in DC that day acc to their Tweet – would they have been party to violence or invading the Capitol? I’m still digesting your ideology but given current events I have to wonder if your ideological “students” would be in the crowd with the Trump “stop the steal” folks and would resort to brute force to achieve their ends? Also I interpret your response to be saying the idea you are a Russian asset is “nonsense” and a distraction from America’s true problems which lie within. Correct?
Yesterday, 7:40 AM
Also there is an allegation that Richard Nikoley has a Dept of Defense IP address. He declined to respond to me about it. The accusation is this gives Sovereign American access to classified info.
Yesterday, 7:45 AM
And there was an allegation of connection to US military through you and the Doolittle Institute in Fla. We don’t see a connection between you and this institute- are we wrong?
Yesterday, 7:46 AM
Would your “disciples,” shall we say, be justified in violence on Wednesday to prevent Biden from being inaugurated?
Yesterday, 10:10 AM
No reporter would use this language. You represented yourself as a reporter. Religions have disciples, Ideologies have advocates. Scientists have promoters. I do science. That’s why it’s so disagreeable to everyone around the political compass because it exposes everyone’s tribal ideological, and religious lies.
I can only tell you what I’ve read online and the SAP looks like a fair representation of some of my work suitable for popular consumption because the technical aspects are left out.
My work and the SAP reflection of it is specific in that we must separate by political preference because political preferences are reflections of genetic demand for different norms, commons, and institutions. So if some people want racially homogenous polities and others want ideologically or religiously homogenous polities then that’s fine. Because it creates a market for different polities and that market is the reason for european success over all the rest in the bronze, iron, and steel ages. Markets calculate. The more calculation the better.
I compare one event by conservatives at the capitol where one person was hurt on each side, because 75M+ people honestly believe the left stole the election, and that this is just another in the 70 year project to destroy western civilization from within as a rational reaction by an oppressed people. I practice European reciprocal and universal ethics, so I compare it with a year of being terrorized, subject to random violence, days on end of riots, looting, fires, and attacks on police and government offices by democratic party advocates, BLM and Antifa – a non-event. Because both sides are showing how close we are to a civil war.
So if your tribe can resort to violence and insurrection for a year without any political push back, and by being justified by the press why should I care about one event that was timid compared to every one of the left’s events. But that’s because I’m an adult using universalist ethics.
My policy and recommendation is that we must separate as the founders intended, into states, that determine their political, social, economic operation and goals. That’s what the constitution promised us. And that’s what I advocate for.
Yesterday, 1:31 PM
I’ve never heard of the Doolittle whatever in Florida until you mentioned it. It’s named after general jimmy doolittle who bombed tokyo and then reformed the military industrial complex under Eisenhower. We are all related because we are a small family from puritan founders of the Boston and New Haven colonies. And Doolittle is an anglicization of norman Dolietta – producing a lot of Do and Du variants.
Richard Nikoley was an early follower but really not a practitioner of the formal logic of natural law that I teach. He tried to get involved but he wasn’t a fit for the technical nature of our work. I think he was a career navy guy if I remember.
Yesterday, 1:35 PM
Now, to be honest with you so that you have less incentive to fantasize and invent connections that don’t exist.
I’m a very competent person. In multiple fields. If I want to start a revolution in the USA I would just put out a half dozen videos by email to explain how it’s done, and how to win, and why it will succeed, and they would spread from person to person virally in minutes.
My objective – which you ignore – is to prevent that war by devolving the federal powers to the States, and maintaining a federal government as the founders designed it, and as the holy roman empire of the greater european peoples survived for over a thousand years.
Yesterday, 1:39 PM
Now I have answered your questions honestly and thoroughly despite your lack of professional candor. I don’t really believe you’re a journalist. You might be some kind of independent gossip seller. But a journalist reports. that’s not what you’re doing.
If you doubt that I am a news reporter, just Google. You will readily see my work. This is reporting – I am going to the original sources – not using second or third-hand info. And I very much appreciate that you are communicating with me. I am working with
@MegsNewz (she and I constitute the investigations team) and @inaminorkey
Yesterday, 1:50 PM
I’m not ignoring your ideas or comments. As a reporter it is my duty to get your response to the allegations. I can’t simply take your ideas and extrapolate answers myself. I don’t want to assume anything.
Yesterday, 1:52 PM
Thank you for this – I will read and ponder on it.
Yesterday, 1:55 PM
My email is bwallman@sunsentinel.com by the way
Yesterday, 2:12 PM
Disciple: a follower or student of a teacher, leader, or philosopher. In using that term I was viewing you as the teacher/leader/philosopher. And the folks at SAP as carrying your ideas. I think that agrees with what you said – even if you were offended by that term.
Yesterday, 2:16 PM
I am extremely sensitive to intellectual dishonesty and the leftist method of deception. It’s one of the core aspects of my work. You chose those terms from the field of terms because it suited you. I’m not offended other than I am jealous of my time. So, fine. I’ll take you at face value. Let’s move on.
Contacted today by one of the team that says they were unaware that I was unaware of them.
Yesterday, 6:11 PM
My understanding is that the entire conservative infrastructure is moving off of leftist owned and financed into conservative owned and financed hosting. And that this is the reason they are offline. Taking it offline makes no sense to me but I don’t have insight.
Yesterday, 6:20 PM
Hello. We’ll be putting a story together today. Noah and the others declined to cooperate for the story. FYI.
11:13 AM
They’re just paranoid because they believe you’ll just smear them with popular tropes, cast them as violent rather than protesters, cast them as hating rather than seeking peaceful separation, and not take what they say on the site at face value. We all started out as libertarians. John Mark approached me in the fall of 18 with the idea we might popularize my work by appealing to the disenfranchised right because they’re an angry mob that we hoped to turn into an organized political body. “organize a disorganized polity” but it’s impossible. They’re a leaderless, angry, economically and politically ostracized mob, traumatized by the destruction of their history, traditions, religion, and culture, and a disorganize mob of an army lacking thought leaders, group leaders, and enough worldly experience to act on their own. Too much macho, not enough discipline, too evangelical on one and, or too militant on the other.
Like I said and like I told the FBI. This civil war has turned from warm to hot and is beyond leaders now. At least trump provided hope. So now it’s going to devolve into chaos on both sides.
We are impossibly divided by impossible differences.
The story posted – I think we gave it an honest assessment. Thanks for the communications.
Yesterday, 5:48 PM
As expected. You cast it as a supremacist organization pent on violence rather than a political organization seeking to avoid our continuous march into violence, by suggesting we should restore the original constitution as an alliance of states with different cultures according to the preferences and needs of the peoples of different regions and localities.
There are no countries that are governable of this scale, and all such attempts at empire (china, india, middle east) result in state failure, legal failure, or developmental failure. and they are easily conquerd externally.
This is why ‘those of us who understand history, economy, demographics, and genetics are doomed to suffer the ignorance of those who dont’.
I don’t believe you could have done better. The truth would have served as advertising not news. It would have failed to fit the newspaper’s brand narrative. And it would have failed to satisfy the editor’s interest in your story. And your interest in income from it.
This is ‘why we can’t have nice things’. We can’t speak the truth because only lies that produce moral outrage, and virtue signal spirals that together generate moral panic, abandonment of reason, and demand for continued conflict.
You didn’t lie. Which is a good thing. You didn’t attack me. that’s a good thing. So for that I”m grateful.
Thank you and good luck.
(LAST CONTACT. NO FURTHER RESPONSE.)
(All)
I suspect the author of the Twitter post below was trolling and using a fictional name – but it’s an opportunity to address the current state of our civilization, that has been more than a century and a half in the making – and the eternal conflict between Europeans(Europe), Hindus(South Asia), Chinese, Africans versus the Semites (South Eurasians).
“The Jews of America are no longer safe. I’m devastated for them and I’m desperately hoping they understand the threat they are facing. The Post-Holocaust ‘Golden Age’ of guilt-based acceptance of Jews is over.”— Ben M Freeman
So that we can try, once again, to avoid another bloodshed, and this time to prevent another dark age, and possibly, even more so, to prevent humanity’s failure to pass through the Great Filter, then perhaps the present crisis – repeating a long history of such crises, provides sufficient incentive and opportunity for Resolving a long-standing problem for us as Europeans, for the Jews, for the Muslims, and for Mankind.
The Great Filter: “Given the age of the universe, the long time for advanced life to emerge, and short time for technology to emerge from it, and absence of other life in the observable universe, there must be one or more barriers to advanced, stellar, interstellar, galactic, and inter-galactic life, that prevents abiogenesis, multicellular life, tool using life, abstract intelligence, technological innovation, and colonization.”
Part I – Group Evolutionary Strategies
Civilizational Context
All proto civilizations, in order to unify larger numbers for larger scales of defense, trade, and cooperation, develop a group competitive evolutionary strategy dependent upon geography, climate, available means of production, present technological development, method of warfare, demographic composition, heterogeneity of, and number of competitors. The strategy is institutionalized by a mythology that provides a paradigm, vocabulary, logic within that paradigm, method of arguing for it, and a set of rituals (debts of loyalty) to reinforce it, including the relation between man and nature, between one another, between the classes, and the authorization of the legitimacy of elites, the hierarchical organization of the polity, and the status signals both good and bad that we call virtues, that demand, justify, and reinforce cooperative behavior at increasing scales.
We Don’t Know Our Group Strategies
We call these ‘metaphysics’ or values as if they are arbitrary – and they aren’t.
Within each strategy, classes develop sub-strategies
There are a limited Number of Strategies – and we can Enumerate Them
There are only so many human strategies – and we discovered and exploited all of them.
The Conflict of Civilizations
All Surviving Strategies Succeed, Some are Moral or Immoral, and advance man, hinder, or regress man – They Aren’t Equal or Relative or Subjective but Physics at Scale
The Axial Age (Civilization Formation) Anchored Our Strategies
—“Axial Age (also Axis Age, from German: Achsenzeit) is a term coined by German philosopher Karl Jaspers in the sense of a “pivotal age”, characterizing the period of ancient history from about the 8th to the 3rd century BCE. During this period, according to Jaspers’ concept, new ways of thinking appeared in Persia, India, China and the Greco-Roman world in religion and philosophy, in a striking parallel development, without any obvious direct cultural contact between all of the participating Eurasian cultures.”— Wiki
We are Midway through a new Axial age, Failed, and are entering a New Dark Age
( … )
The Value of Cooperation within Group and their Strategies
( … )
The Ternary Logic of Cooperation
We are unfortunately indoctrinated into the logic of inference used in verbal and textual interpretation, rather than the logic of operations – a sequence of human operations first, and then the logic of verbal and textual communication and interpretation of those operations. So, we find in the logic of operations, instead of just True and False:
There are three states of logic, in order from more certainty to less:
1. False certainty
… 2. Truth candidatate (actionable)
3. Undecidable (In-actionable)
There are Three States of Truth in the Spectrum of Demand for Truth
Incoherent – Meaningless
1. … Coherent but inconsistent with satisfying the demand for decidability
2. … … Coherent and Consistent but Insufficient to satisfy the demand for decidability
3. … … … Coherent, Consistent, Correspondent and Sufficientto satisfy the demand for decidability
Tautological – Meaningless.
There are Three states of Testimony
1. Honesty – Surviving Due Diligence against deceit
2. Testifiable Truth – Due diligence against inference bias: loading, framing, obsuring…) – surviving due diligence by self-testing.
3. Untestifiable Ideal Truth – If one had perfect knowledge, paradigm, vocabulary – surviving application in the market – surviving market due-diligence against ignorance and error.
There are Three states of Knowledge in the Spectrum of Knowledge
( .. epistemology … )
There are Three states of Ethics in the Ethical Spectrum
( … ethics … ) Amoral, Ethical, Moral, Virtuous and Unethical, Immoral, Evil
There are only three states of cooperation
1. Irreciprocity: parasitism– to predation (conflict) Logically False
… 2. Reciprocity: exchange – to integration(cooperation) Logically True
3. Boycott: avoidance – to separation (ostracization) Logically Undecidable
And;
Interestingly enough there are only three corresponding methods of influence, persuasion, and coercion available to man, by rate of effect:
1. Force or Defense (imposition of harm, defense from harm)
… 2. Remuneration (deprivation of trade, or benefit from trade), and;
… … 3. Ostracization from and Insurance formembership: opportunity or loss of opportunity for cooperation, and the discounts on the opportunities that arise from membership.
And;
We can Scale each of the three-axis of coercion by the threedegrees of coercion:
1. Influence – informing others in their interests
… 2. Coercion – coercing others to follow your interests
… … 3. Power – organized coercion of others for your or collective interests
And;
We can scale each axis of coercion by dree of certainty:
1. Undecidability
… 2. Possibility
… … 3. Potential
… … … 4. Probability
… … … … 5. Likelihood
… … … … … 6. Certainty
Giving us: Axis(Force, Remuneration, Undermining) > Coerciveness > Certainty
And;
Interestingly, these reflect human specialization in the evolutionary sexual division of labor:
1. Force and Political Construction by the Dominant Males that hold territory using physical super predation
… 2. Tradeand Productive Construction by the ascendant males that use cunning and opportunity and economic super-predation
3. Undermining and Social Construction by females that raise children using social super predation.
And
These reflect moral biases
And
These reflect personality biases
And
These reflect expressed political biases
And
These reflect reproductive strategies
Male Reciprocity and Proportionality (Merit) = Eugenic: adversarial competition maintaining natural selection. Necessary for clan, tribe, nation, survival.
-vs-
Female Reciprocity and Equality (Non-Merit) = Dysgenic: social conformity maintaining stasis. Rise and Fall All.
-vs-
Male-Female Compatibilism: an equilibrium of Reciprocity between proportionality and equality wherein females agitate for male production of goods, services, and information (commons) in order to satisfy their want for consumption – in exchange for costly reproduction – while preserving competitive advantage and not surrendering competitive advantage, given that females are devoted to children but not loyal to males.
AND;
As such, we organize by the scale of polity:
1. Kin (Tribe) – Law (Law, Economic)
2. State(Nation) – Force (Military, Political)
3. Cult(Civilisation) – Ostracizaton (Mythology, Social)
AND;
As such we develop elites and elite institutions in each method of coercion:
1. Force by State and Command – serving interests of upper classes
… 2. Remuneration by Commerce and Law – serving interests of middle classes
3. Religion by Priesthood, and Tradition – serving interests of lower classes
AND;
And the elites naturally gravitate to servicing clientele:
GHENGIS KHAN -- THOMAS JEFFERSON -- MOTHER THERESA
VIOLENCE...........EXCHANGE............SUBSIDY
RIGHT...............CENTER..............LEFT
FATHER...............SON.............SISTER/MOTHER
And
Evolution is limited by Path Dependency in a Group Strategy
Path dependence is when the decisions presented to people are dependent on prior decisions or experiences made in the past. So whether the information is genetic and invisible to us, metaphysical (a paradigmatic interpretation of the universe, world, man and our societies, presumptive habit
Adaptivity by The sequence of the development of State, Law, and Religion, like the foundation of any evolutionary structure, is anchored by the first institution the people develop, and the strategy, mythology, wisdom literature, method of argument, institutions that evolve in that series. Thereafter the civilization is somewhat a prisoner of that initial choice just as all alliances, organizations, technologies, and ideas are bound by previous decisions.
First Institution
Strong Foundation
Second Institution
Supportive to Foundation
Third Institution
Weak or Failed Foundation
Religion
State
Law
Religion
Law
State
State
Religion (or Philosophy)
Law
State
Law
Religion
Law
State
Religion
Law
Religion
State
And this order dominates all thought throughout the civilization and throughout history.
Examples:
State -> Law -> Religion ==> (China)
State-> Religion(Confucian) -> Law ==> (China – Failed Law)
Law > Religion > State ==> (no one)
Law > State > Religion(Philosophy) ==> (Europe)
Religion(Theology) -> State > Law ==> (Middle east)
Religion(Mythology) -> Law -> State ==> (India)AND;Political power originates in the ability of humans to organize by individual influence, groupcoercion, and institutionalpower.
Influence: Individual Influence > Group Coercion > Institutional Power
1. It just so happens that we use gossip to rally and shame and ostracize people from production and opportunity for consumption: Religion. But then we scale.
2. It just so happens that you need to use violence to suppress parasitism sufficiently for a market to form, at that scale: State. But then we scale further.
3. And then to use law to suppress cheating, fraud, and to impose performance, and restitution, and if necessary, punishment: Law. But then we scale further.
4. And then we use wealth created by the application of violence and law and to force market participation rather than parasitism, to pay off those who cannot be forced.
5. And then, we hit the novel inflection point, and scale further:
6. And so we then use force, law and gossip to suppress the suppressors, and rely entirely upon rule of law, without a group of elites or institutions that exercises power.
So the sooner one develops rule of law, the sooner one starts suppressing the parasitism of the monopoly.
AND GIVEN;
The disproportionate returns on increasing scales of cooperation in a division of sensation, perception, cognition, prediction, memory, wants, advocacy, negotiation, and labor.
AND;
The Competitive Value of Marginal Increases in the Rate of Adaptation by Physical and Caloric, Social and institutional, Cognitive and Technological means.
AND;
A Group’s Founding Relationships with the universe:
To The Natural World,
To Choices toward Others,
By An Organizational Model,
By Means of Mythology, and Paradigms
By Means of Persuasion and Negotiation,
and
By Grammar of Communication
AND;
The Spectrum of Relationships with The Natural World
– Peers, Ascendants, Transformers, Conquerors of Nature (Europeans)
– In Harmony with Nature – bias mankind (East Asians)
– Interwoven Supernatural and Natural — bias supernatural (Hindu)
– Subjects of the Supernatural (Semitic)
AND;
The Spectrum Three Axes of Choices Toward Others:
– Predation, Parasitism, Rent Seeking, Free Riding, Undermining
– Competition by the degree of Non-imposition, Cooperation, and Trade
– Boycotting Avoidance of conflict or cooperation
AND;
The Spectrum of Three Axes of Organizing Order and Elites Internally
– Force/Defense: Military/Judiciary — Authority (positive)
– Remuneration/Deprivation: Finance/industry – Markets (exchange)
– Undermining/Inclusion: Priesthood/intellectuals – Resistance (negative)
AND;
Rule by Spectrum of Three Axes of Decidability
1. Reason andCommand (China India) – Requires Justification
2. Empiricism(science) and Law (Europe) – Requires Truth
3. Sophistry and Propaganda (Semitia) – Requires Sophistry
AND;
The Spectrum of Mythologies
– History (truth), Essay, Science
– Literature (analogy), Mythology
– Deceit (fraud), Scripture, Theology
THEREFORE;
All civilizations produce these elements of group evolutionary strategy:
(a) A Group Evolutionary (competitive) Strategy,
(b) A Group Organizing Strategy to Pursue it
(c) A Mythology to explain and justify it,
(d) A Wisdom Literature (or hierarchy of) to communicate it,
(e) A System of Argument to persuade and defend it, and;
(f) A set of Institutions to persist it.
(f) A set of Elites to Regulate it (Govern)
(g) A set of Traditions, Values, Norms, Habits to Act within it.
(h) A Continous Stream Of Cooperation and Competition and Conflict.
(i) Survival (Persistence)
(j) At different Rates of Adaptation, stagnation, decline.
|STRATEGY|Strategy > Organizing Strategy > Mythology > Wisdom Literature > System of Argument > Institutions > Traditions, Values, Norms, Habits > Actions.
Part II – A Comparison of Group Strategies
The Evolution of Man
( …. )
The Evolution of Groups
( …)
The Problems of ScaleThe Neural Economy
The Neural Economy, Uncertainty, and Worry (neuroticism)
The Demand for “Meaning”The Demand For Agency (Will to Power, or control, or survival)The Demand for Mindfulness
I mean the physical, cognitive and emotional discipline to control the subject of attention on the present intent, insulated from distractions whether personal, environmental, or interpersonal.
—“People are not evolved for producing statements of secular epistemic purity but rather for survival through cooperation negotiated by language.”–
Decidability and mindfulness are market goods. We require these goods to compensate for a complex unpredictable (kaleidic) world.
Traits Agreeableness, Extraversion, and Neuroticism
Personal: The market demand for personal mindfulness (Spiritualism) whether empathic-feminine (theological), moral-masculine(rational), or analytic-masculine(scientific) exists, and all three demands exist for most of us.
Interpersonal: The Market Demand for interpersonal mindfulness by creating a standard dialog, set of signals, and manners that are costly to learn and practice, but that by practicing display to others you are worthy of honest cooperation on the same terms.
Social: The market demand for social mindfulness (limitation of fear and comfort in the ethical, and moral. These are moral rules that serve the group’s competitive strategy – and all reflect the environmental challenges of the age of transformation in which men invented religions.,
Political: The market demand for political mindfulness (limits on political action and on rulers actions). I won’t cover each of them here.
Strategic: The Market Demand for a group strategy – gypsy parasitism, Jewish parasitism, Muslim parasitism, predation and conquest, Christian undermining of the truth, knowledge, reason, law, property, aristocracy by rallying the peasantry and women and slaves against all and being as expansionary as islam – to counter islam. Buddhist submission and obedience Hindu class duty and function in the ‘harmony’. Chinese hierarchical family (bureaucracy). Anglo aristocratic egalitarianism (entrepreneurship and corporation).
( … title … )
1. Dominance (Real, Techne-Science, Materialism, Action)
Statism Nationalism (Tribalism) Achieves mindfulness because of participation in state
Soldiery Achieves mindfulness through military fraternity
Agency Achieves Mindfulness because of achievement or success
2. Utility( Idealism, Philosophy, Reason, Choice, Mind)
Aristotelian-Anglo Philosophy
Continental and Platonic European Philosophy
Confucian–Daoist Philosophy
3. Insulation (Accommodation, Ritualization, Thought, Intuition )
Stoicism achieves mindfulness through small daily task completion in a virtuous manner.
Shinto achieves mindfulness through the precise repetition of ritual in a respectful manner.
Buddhism achieves mindfulness through meditation and escape from reality.
4. Submission (Supernatural, Theology, Empathy, Feeling)
Christianity achieves mindfulness by personal and collective prayer (and song).
Islam achieves mindfulness by many memorizations and ritual prayers during every single day.
Judaism achieves mindfulness by separatism and deep indoctrination
The question is, given how the various religions solved mindfulness (Stoicism-epicureanism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Abrahamism) which produces agency (stoicism), which produces optimism (Hinduism), which produces withdrawal from reality (Buddhism) and which denies and escapes reality (Abrahamism).
The Geographic Origin of Group Strategies
Hostilelands: African Ethics (pre-Christian). Africa is akin to the Desertlands because of the sheer number of competitors, the hostility of the disease gradient, the plethora of wildlife, combined with the primitiveness of the available technologies. This is the only possible strategy until one or more core states can evolve, and create sufficient stability in some regions. (this is occurring now).
Desertlands: Muslim Ethics: (I am still working on this one because I don’t get that it’s causal – but opportunistic.) What can I justify now in order to make this minor advance now? And thereby accumulate wins by wearing down opponents over long periods. The ethics of opportunism. As far as i can tell Islam is just an excuse for justifying opportunism. We can consider this the combination of religion and justifying opportunism – a long term very successful strategy because it’s very low cost
Steppelands: Russian(0rthodox) Ethics: What can I get away with now by negotiation and subterfuge, and hold by force later? (steppe raiders) The ethics of steppe people surrounded by competitors, always hostile and unpredictable. This is a difficult and expensive but only possible strategy, when one is surrounded by hostile opportunity seekers. While seemingly expansive, it’s actually a fearful one, aggression as the only possible means of controlling defensive positions across open territory.
Borderlands: Cosmopolitanerish) Ethics: What will someone consent to Regardless of future resentment and retaliation? (borderland/subculture/ deontological ethics: rules) The ethics of diasporic, migrating traders, or herding peoples who can prey upon the locals who hold territory. This is a very low cost (parasitic) ethics that avoids all contribution to the host commons, but requires preserving the ability to exit (migrate). it is the raider strategy by systemic and verbal rather than physical means.
Forestlands: Family, Clan Farms, Villages. Transportation expensive. Forests are dark and scary places full of brigands. Aristocratic Ethics: What will someone not retaliate against even if we agree to it?(rulers/teleological ethics: outcomes) The ethics of warriors who must hold territory. This is a very high-cost strategy because while professional warrior aristocracy is militarily superior, smaller numbers mean threats must be constantly suppressed when small, as soon as identified. (Profiting from the domestication of man)
Riverlands: Riverlands strategy defends against Steppland and Desertland strategies. (Profiting from the domestication of man) Chinese Ethics: What can I get away with now, but over time make it impossible to change later? The ethics of long term ruling bureaucratic class. Sun Tzu strategy, and Confucian hyper familism. This is an exceptionally cost-effective strategy if one possesses a territorial resource (heartland), and can fortify that heartland.
Fertile River Land: (Profit from the subjugation of man) (Cyrus was lost). Bias to Empire.
Coastal-Island Lands – Athens, Scandinavia Bias to Trade
Island Lands – Cyprus, Crete, BRITAIN, Naval bias to Trade.
Diasporic People – Gypsies, Travellers, Jews
AND THEREFORE;
We All Evolved Through Wisdom Literature and Systems of Argument
Burial …
… Ancestor ….
… Animism ….
… Seasons (Agrarianism)
… … Sun Tzu Realism ( Martial Realism)
… … … Confucianism (harmony)
… … … … Daoism (Tolerance)
… … Proto IE Religion
… … … Proto Vedic
… … … … Hinduism
… … … … … Buddhism (stoic)
… … … … … … Buddhism (supernatural)
… … … … Zoroastrianism
… … … European Sky Father (martial realism)
… … … … European Common Law (legal realism)
… … … … … Platonism (idealism)
… … … … … … Aristotelianism (Epicureanism) (realism naturalism)
… … … … … … … Roman History, Law and Administration
… … … … … … … … (The Dark Ages)
… … … … Germanic Common Law
… … … … … English Common Law
… … … … … … The Aristotelian (Classical) Restoration (Italy, England)
… … … … … … … The Aesthetic Restoration (Renaissance)
… … … … … … … The Empirical Restoration (England)
… … … … … … … … The First Scientific Revolution (Theoretic)
… … … … … … … … … Agrarian, Commerical, Financial, Industrial Revolutions (Applied)
… … … … … … … … … … The Second Scientific Revolution
… … … … … … … … … … … The Technological (Applied) Revolution
… … … … … … … … The French Counter-Empirical Revolution (Enlightenment)
… … … … … … … … The German Counter-Empirical Revolution (Phenomenalism)
… … Proto Semitic (Animism)
… … … Proto Judaism
… … … … … Abrahamism <- Zoroastrianism (Authoritarianism)
… … … … … … Rabbinical Judaism (Justificationism)
… … … … … … … … The Ashkenazi Rationalization (Mendelsohn)
… … … … … … … … … The Ashkenazi Pseudoscientific Counter-Revolution
… … … … … … … … … … Boaz, Freud, Marx, Gould Marxism (Science Denial)
… … … … … … … … … … … NeoMarxism (Cultural Marxism)
… … … … … … … … … … … … Postmodernism > PC > Woke > Cancel Culture > Deplatforming
… … … … … … … … … … … … … Anti-Colonialism >Anti Whiteness > White Replacement
… … … … … … … … … … … … Anti-Male Feminism > Mysandry
… … … … … … Christianity (resistance)
… … … … … … … The Augustinian Conflation (compromise)
… … … … … … … … Orthodoxy – Catholicism, (settlement)
… … … … … … … … … Protestantism, (reformation)
… … … … … … … … … … Evangelicalism (folk-religion restoration)
… … … … … … … Islam (7th c+)
… … … … … … … … Fundamentalist Islam (11-12th c+)
… … … … … … … … … Wahabi Fundamentalist Islam (20th c+)AND;
Adaptability Of Wisdom Literature Response Times
Just as methods of influence produce different response times (effect rates) so does wisdom literature.
Natural Lawinstantly and continuously evolves with each court finding.
Continuous Adaptation
Least Prescriptive.
Most Chance of Rotation.
Most personal and social stress.
Truth-before-face
State Command responds slowly by necessity, but fast.
Selective (crisis) Adaptation
Selectively prescriptive.
Selectively adaptive – usually by shocks.
Life of Stasis and infrequent Shocks.
Face-before-Truth
Philosophy requires generational revision or replacement, but slowly.
General (Great Change) Adaptation
Truth Before Face
Wisdom Literature requires intergenerational reinterpretation to changes. But very slowly.
Consistency regardless of a change
Contingent
Scripture requires frequent re-justification in response to change, but never changes.
Stagnation or prohibition on change.
Most Prescriptive.
No Chance of Rotation.
Least personal and social stress.
Face Regardless of Truth
AND;
THEREFORE:
1. China (Northeast Asia) developed the State, and institutionalized philosophy, but failed at law, limiting adversarial competition in commerce and invention, but succeeded by mastery of statecraft – using a rational basis of thought – at the cost of slow evolution in technology.
China: Military -> State -> Religion (Philosophy) -> Failed at Law
Imported reformed Hinduism in the form of Buddhism.
Strategy: Delay, Deceive, And Trickery to Overwhelm, Assimilate, by Incremental Expansion, applying overwhelming numbers to push forward the walls of the fortress with cultural, institutional, and genetic conquest. The China myth is just that, and the longest it’s been a unified empire was a century. China has better demographic trait distribution than India but to some degree – as the Great Khan learned – her numbers make her unconquerable, only temporarily governable.
Lao Tzu,Sun Tzu, and Confucius, (Wisdom: What should be) All 6th-5th C BC wrote Philosophical Wisdom Literature. Lao Tzu crossed the line into the questionable. Note that Buddhism was developed in India in the 5th Century BC, but did not succeed there. Buddhism succeeded where the people still retained “Natural Religion“: Ancestor, spirit, and nature worship.
2. Japan (Northeast Asia) is perhaps the world’s most successful state and second only to England and Germany because of her distance from the empirical revolution. To some degree, adaptive Japan is to authoritarian China as adaptive England was to authoritarian and backward France.
Japan: Miliary Success -> State Success -> Law Success -> Religion Unnecessary, Limited Buddhism imposed.
3. India (South Asia) adopted Religion, failed at state, and failed at law, succeeded by numbers that despite numbers demographics and poverty produced a nearly idyllic civilization – using a practical basis of thought – at the cost of castes to prevent dysgenia at the top, failing to shrink the bottom, and making the evolution of the civilization next to impossible.
India: Military Failure -> Religion -> State Failure -> Law Failure
Imported UK Law, State, Education. (Unfortunately, French Socialism)
Strategy: The Immovable Object: Use the massive population and deeply ingrained culture to resist them with kindness, at the cost of tolerating frustration and extractive rule.
Indians (WISDOM, RITUAL, PRAYER, What should be) Wrote both mythology and wisdom literature, bordering on political science, from 1500 to 500 bc, then developed gods through 500AD, and continued to evolve through contributions of ‘saints’ through 1500AD despite Islamic conquest and interference.
4. Iranic Persia ( …. )
The Persians (INDIVIDUAL UTOPIAN UNIVERSALISM) wrote supernormal and supernatural wisdom literature. Zoroastrianism 6th C BC. They did not make the full leap from religion to philosophy.
5. Semitia (South Eurasia) adopted religion, then religious law, then failed at the state, and civilizationally succeeded by religion – using a supernatural basis of thought, at the cost of generating demand for superstition and resistance to change.
Semitia: Transient Military (State Failure) -> Religion -> Law (Religious) -> State Failure
Importing State (failed) Importing Law (failed)
Competition between kritarchic Priest Law vs State Law.
Strategy: Continuous insurrection by non-adaptation and zero tolerance for adaptation at the cost of non-productivity.
The Semitic Abrahamists , from 6th c BC, to 6th c AD, evolved traditional Semitic polytheistic religion into monolatry, then monotheism, then branched into Christianity, rabbinical Judaism, and Islam (and others). (Wrote Mythology, Resistance, Rebellion, Separatism, and Lie and Destruction of all of the above. (COMMAND, UTOPIAN LIE) They conflated theology, philosophy, and law into authoritarian religion.
The Egyptians (Lost Civilization ) wrote no systemic text for their natural religion (mythology, animism, polytheism, They practiced traditional trade: RITUAL AND SACRIFICE Supernatural (Animism, Anthropomorphism, heathenism ) Doctrine and Ritual.
7. Europeans (West Eurasia) developed law, then the state, and failed at religion, succeeded by law – using the empirical basis of thought – generating the fastest culture of innovation and adaptation humanly possible at the cost of the necessity of market suppression of reproduction continuing human domestication, and importing a foreign religion for the masses. Unfortunately the combination of overextension, immigration, religious conversion,
Europe: Military -> Law -> State -> Religion Failure (Philosophy)
Imported Religion (Christianity)
Strategy: Quality over Quantity: small numbers on the edge of the bronze age must maneuver, innovate, and adapt rapidly, to pressure from hordes of superior numbers.
Aristotle, Epicurus, Democritus; (TRUTH, What is.) Wrote Proto Empiricism: Reason, Naturalism, Proto-empiricism, Law, Calculation. So the greeks and romans crossed from tradition into philosophy and then empiricism (science). Truth Regardless of Cost.
7. RussianEuropeans (Eastern Europe and North Eurasia) were following the general European technical and intellectual dispersal eastward but were interrupted by the Mongol invasion, their reconquest of their territories, their successful expansion, rapid Europeanization, but exhaustion from the Jewish Bolshevik Revolution, resulting terrors and the enormous sacrifice fighting the Germans. So Russia’s national myth is excessively one of world war two, not their series of triumphs over adversity, despite being on the edge of European civilization and surrounded by hostiles to south and east – and unfortunately west.
Russia: Military -> Weak State -> Religion (Orthodoxy) -> Now Law
Russia imported orthodoxy deliberately (almost Islam) just as did Japan Buddhism, in order to educate, govern, and tax the peasantry.
Strategy:
8. Africa, or at least west Africa, given her remoteness, was on the cusp of her first empires when interrupted by colonialism. The same is true for North America.
Africa: (Military and State Formation Interrupted)
Christianity imported, and Islam enforced. Experimental but hopeful.
9. Mesoamerican early civilization, again remote, and perhaps the most brutal and gruesome in history, was terminated by colonialism. As was Stone Age north Amerindian proto-civilization.
Americas: Military -> Religion -> State Failure, Law Failure
Exterminated by Europeans and Neighbors
10. Gypsies, Jews, Arabs, and Turks ( … )
Gypsy
(Under Suppression)
While the list of disaspora is long, only the various gypsies and jews completely gave up territorial holding and state formation. The gpysy strategy is low-level parasitic specializing in begging, black market, petty crime, gambling, prostitution, entertainment (music, dancing, singing), fortue telling, . And resorting to manual labor when necessary.
—“They pool resources to start and operate fortune-telling businesses. They work together in teams, tarmacking, tinning, and roofing houses. To restrict competition in their fields of work, Gypsies also collude. Kumpaniyi carve up geographic territories, each receiving the exclusive right to operate in a given area. For example, in Gypsies’ most lucrative economic activity—fortune telling—kumpaniyi divide economic territories into three-block areas.
In non-Gypsies’ eyes, Gypsies are thieves. Gypsies have contributed to this stereotype by stealing from and/or defrauding opportunistically. gadjo (non-romani, like Jews use Goy for non-jews or as we Europeans call barbarians, primitives, or even animamls’) For Gypsies, using one’s cleverness to relieve a gadjo of his money or property is a virtue, not a vice. Thus Gypsies don’t scruple at defrauding fortune-telling customers or engaging outsiders in other confidence games. Abusing and defrauding government welfare programs is also a popular and important economic activity for modern Roma.”— Peter Leeson, Economics, George Mason University 2012
As such gypsies functionas a low level infection, and since they are rarely a threat to the sate or economy they are only persecuted for excesses.
Gypsies practice various religions but they also practice supernatural customs, particularly of cleanliness and sexuality – the most dramatic of which is that outsiders are unclean. The severity of this superstition is as demanding as most formal religions.
Nepotism (Sustaining Judaism and Jewish People)
Separatism (a state within a state), (Buiding Support for Israel)
Parasitism (avoidance of broader commons, privatizing commons)
Manual or Craft, Construction Labor
Moral Crime
Petty Crime
Jewish
(Undermined England, Germany, France, Ukraine, and Russia)
The Jewish religion was the first to require literacy. While philosophy required literacy, religion came to literacy late and last. Literacy both prohibited a bottom class, and gave access to higher-paying administrative jobs. By the second century, nearly all jews had given up farming – or given up on the religion. The Jewish “Avoidance of work” has remained an enduring feature of jewish civlization.
The resulting diaspora, selection for ingroup bias, the exit of failures, upward redistribution of reproduction to Rabbis, and frequent retaliatory prosecutions and bottlenecks produced expected results.
AND;
Differences In Civilizational Colonization (Expansion)
Chinese
(Formal Institutional intentons of conquering: Burma, Laos, Northern India, Vietnam, Nepal, Bhutan, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, the Ryukyu Islands, 300 islands of the South China, East China and Yellow Seas, as well as Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Taiwan, South Kazakhstan, the Afghan province of Bahdashan, Transbaikalia and the Far East to South Okhotsk.)
Islamic
(Destroyed and reduced to dysgenia and ashes all the civilizations of North Africa, Egypt, Levant, Mesopotamia, Persia, Indus-India, Anatolia, Caucuses, Byzantium, Old Europe (Balkans). Then Turkey Lost back to Islamism. Islam is now destroying Europe through immigration, reproduction, parasitism, undermining, and conversion once again.)
Orthodox-Russian
( Conquered Golden Horde, Conquered Sibera, Lost SE Europe, Lost East Europe, Lost Uzbekistan )AND;
Creating Macro Competition between Civilizations: A Vicious Cycle of Civilizational Warfare
( … )
1. Anatolian Hittites versus Egypt enabling the bronze age collapse
2. South Eurasian Iranic Persians versus European Greek Anatolians
3. Alexander Crossing the Bosphorus versus Persia resulting in infection of the west with oriental authoritarian mysticism while spreading Greek Reason, Langauge, High Culture, and Monetary systems across south Eurasia
4. Rome versus Semitic Judea resulting in the Diaspora and the infection of Europe by Jewish seditious mysticism
5. Jewish Christians versus Rome resulting in the Fall of Rome and the Semitic Abrahamic Dark Age
7. Muslims vs the world, and against West Europe in Spain, and Old Europe in the Balkans, and European Anatolia.
6. (Jews Versus Spain)(slavery)
7. (Jewish Facilitation of European Warfare)
8. Jewish
6. Jews versus Russia resulting in the horrors of the Soviet Union – Maoism and Cambodia by imitation.
7. Fascists versus Jews resulting in the Fall of European Empires
8. Postwar Jews versus the EU and USA leading to the present collapse – and the present beginning of the second Semitic Dark AgeAND;
Normative competitions within civilizations: The Enlightenment Failure
( … )
More Evidence that Every Bad Idea Begins In France
( … )
AND;
Micro Competitions within Nations
( … )
AND;
Classes
( … )
AND;
Minorities
( … )
In the modern world, Europeans alone are tolerant of hostiles.
PART III – EUROPEAN GROUP EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY
In Contrast with the European Group Evolutionary Strategy
European Group strategy is consistent across European Steppe Herders practicing entrepreneurial cattle raiding and warfare; European mixed herder agrarians practicing conquest of Europe – killing the men and keeping the women as they had captured cattle and women on the steppe; With the only example in written memory being the Spartans, who for all intents and purposes retained the strategy by which the European steppe herders conquered the European continent for profit. As such, they commercialized with the other Greeks conquering locals and overextending; Romans conquering locals and overextending; Franks conquering Europe and overextending. Conquering the Levant and overextending. Conquering the new world and overextending; the British restoring the Roman Empire an overextending – all in the greatest commercial enterprise in history: the domestication of animal man for profit. And by overextension, collapsing, as did Rome, out of unwillingness to use middle eastern or far eastern brutality ‘on their inventory’.
The West’s Group strategy is a universal militia maximizing speed, maneuver, adaptation, innovation, by the continuous domestication (farming) of agency, through self-determination, sovereignty and reciprocity, oath and truth before face, dependent on meritocracy, absent authority, leaving only adversarialism as a means of decidability, voting for production of commons, rule of law for dispute resolution, and markets for the production of goods services and information, and the necessity governing those with less agency, and culling those who lack agency, by natural and market selection, producing the civilization with the greatest conformity to and discovery of, adaptation to and application of the formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe.
The European group strategy is consistent whether steppe raiders, continental conquerors, Greeks, Romans, Nordics, Vikings, English, pirates, and American settlers: democracy rule of law, and empiricism, is the only method of governing a militia of voluntary entrepreneurial warriors. And that tradition has survived five thousand years – including the dark ages. The critics were right. And this is why the Americans most, Australians next, and British least maintain that ethic. And why the American constitution differs little from that of their pre-literate ancestors.
“An army of all, of a universal militia, of universal entrepreneurs, self-governed by the Natural Law of self-determination, by self-determined means, by the reciprocal grant of, the defense of, the inalienability of, and insurance of, individual sovereignty in all demonstrated interests, and reciprocity in all display, word, and deed, to all members of the polity that are demonstrably able, willing, worthy, and sworn to exchange them, producing adversarial markets in all aspects of life: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war – and as a consequence, the fastest innovation and adaptation of knowledge, technology, economy, polity, war, and man, by the continuous evolution of human agency, producing the greatest transcendence of man, in the shortest time, under the greatest prosperity, with the greatest certainty – and the continuation of natural selection by suppression of the reproduction of those demonstrating unfitness for those markets – an aristocracy, holding to the primacy of man, profiting from the incremental domestication of the human-animal into peers. And as a consequence, institutionalizing and industrializing the production of human agency – rapidly evolving man from animal, to slave, to serf, to freeman, to citizen, to sovereign and into the gods they imagined.”
(See The Economics of Pirates” )
While that’s a formal description in legal prose, our law of sovereignty and reciprocity says only ‘Do no harm to private or common’. And it does not limit that harm to the person or physical goods. It includes the personal, physical, familial, shared, common, normative, traditional, and civilizational assets upon which all of us depend for our disproportionate wealth and choice compared to the rest of the world: demonstrated interests. That’s not an opinion on, or theory of, human behavior. The evidence of human behavior.
The Importance of Great Ambitions for European People
( … ) An army requires risk action and material costs and is a higher cost than organized religion and is most rapid and influential; an organized religion requires social and psychological costs and is a higher cost than an ideology and is more durable, and an ideology requires political advocacy and is a higher cost and more actionable than a philosophy.
The Importance of trifunctionalism to the European People
The Importance of Truth To European People
( … )
PART IIII – JEWISH GROUP EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY
Understanding Jewish Group Strategy
Legend:
… Normal = Via MacDonald
… Italic* = Via Doolittle
European Cultural Origins
(Territorial and Political Control)
Jewish Cultural Origins
(Lack of Territorial and Political Control)
Evolutionary History
Northern Hunter-Gatherers + Anatolian Farmers + European Steppe HerdersVia Militial Entrepreneurialism: Low ClannishnessVia Metalsmithing: TechnologyVia Domestication of Horse and Man: Primacy of Man.
Middle Old World Pastoralists (Herders)
South EurasiansVia Long Poverty: High ClannishnessVia Writing (Egyptians): TheologyVia State Failure: Resentment: Primacy of Gods
Kinship System
Bilateral; Weakly Patricentric
(Share Capital In Security)*
Unilineal; Strongly Patricentric
(maintain capital b/c insecurity)*
Family System
Simple Household;
Extended Family; Joint Household
Marriage Practices
Exogamous
Monogamous
Endogamous,
Consanguineous
Polygynous
Marriage Psychology
Companionate;
Based on Mutual Consent and Affection
Utilitarian;
Based on Family Strategizing and Control of Kinship Group
Position of Women
Relatively High
Relatively Low
Social Structure
(Social Organization)
Individualistic; (Self Determination, Merit)
Republican; (Aristocratic Egalitarian, Merit)
Democratic; (Militial, Merit)Maintain Adaptivity and Maneuver, to maintain military and political success.
Collectivistic; (Survival not merit)
Authoritarian; (Intolerant)
Charismatic LeadersMaintain Group Coherence despite political and military failure.
Socialization
Stresses:
Independence,
Self-Reliance
Stresses:
Ingroup Identification,
Obligations to Kinship Group
Self Direction
Deliberate Choice in Political Marketplace
Social Construction in Social Marketplace
Self Correction
Altruistic Punishment
Threat of Ostracization(No altruistic Punishment)
Intellectual Stance
Reason;
Science
Dogmatism;
Submission to Ingroup Authority and Charismatic Leaders
Legal Organization*
Neutral Judiciary between Military, Economy, and Faith
Rule by Judiciary (priesthood)
Legal Interpretation*
Scientific and Transactional
Forcing Continuous Adaptation;
Adaptive, Evolutionary
Promoting Eugenia
Sophistic, and Reinterpreted (Pilpul)
Prohibiting Adaptation
Maladaptive; Devolutionary
Promoting Dysgenia
Institutional Evolution
Military > Empirical Law > Philosophy > (Religious Failure)
Priesthood (religion) > Theological Law > State Failure > Landholding Failure
Moral Universalism:
Morality is Independent of Group Affiliation
Moral Particularism;
Ingroup/Outgroup Morality;
“Good is what is good for the Jews”
Ethnocentrism
Relatively Low
Relatively High:
“Hyperethnocentrism”
Xenophobia
Relatively Low
Relatively High:
“Hyperxenophobia”
Understanding Jewish Mythology and Cohesion
( The Problem of Confronting Reality: physical natural evolutionary laws)
(The Importance of Social Construction for Jews)
(The difficulty in maintaining the illusion of virtue in crime)
(The importance of Enemies for Jews to Prey Upon )
(The Importance of Access To Enemy Territory)
(The Limite Number of Enemies They Can Prey Upon) – Soros and the open society.
The most racist of peoples, Jews can claim they aren’t because they aren’t responsible for the consequences.
The Blacksmith and the DemonUnderstanding Jewish Group Tactics
Technically speaking the Jews (and Muslims) hide behind special pleading (pretense of innocence, pretense of victimhood) – and plausible deniabilty for race, for religion, and for past (justified) persecution, while they practice warfare from within by treason (priority of external loyalty), sedition (undermining from within) rather than warfare by physical violence, to conduct their war against informational, social, political, economic institutions by evasion “gossiping, shaming, outraging, rallying, moralizing, psychologizing, loading, framing, false and exaggerated accusation” ) to undermine rather than offer (“trutful, reciprocal, possible, survivable and beneficial”) competing alternatives, and using critique (criticism to undermine a proposition rather than advocating an equally criticizable competing solution), social construction (false narratives), pilpul (sophistry), fictionalism (pseudoscience, idealism, supernaturaalism), baiting into hazard (seduction, enticement, entrapment) using historical obscurantism and revisionism (disinformation), false promise (freedom from probability, determinism, scarcity, and self interest, reciprocity, kin selection, and regresson to the mean, genetic load, and natural selection), and financial warfare (concentration of incentives to produce concentration of force), legal contrivance (abuse of juridical defense) exploiting our unique european tolerance for adversarial ideals *within the law*, and using conspiracy (ethnocentrism, separatism), to profit from war from within against european peoples who uniquely (falsely) concieve of warfare as limited to physical conflict – because of the western indo european founding principles of self determination by self determined means, by adversarial(scientific) resolution of disputes, under the rules of reciprocity in display word and deed, including testimonial speech ( truthful, empirical, warrantied, liable) including trifunctional adversarial conflict between elites in military, law and faith, with military limiting it’s dominance expression to returns on the commons, the law holding to the oath of neturality, the faith holding to the oath of non-aggression under the law, and all three eliets to the oath of ‘do no harm’ within the polity.
( jewish nepotism etc here)A Long History of Profiting From Harm (And reveling in it)
( … )
Baiting Into Hazard
( … )
Defining a Hazard – “In old English law an unlawful game at dice, those who play at it being called ‘hazardors’. In modern law, any game of chance or wagering.”
Creating a Hazard – A failure of due diligence in defending others against a hazard you are either aware of or have created. i.e. a failure to cover a well-hole that a child can fall into. Old but common one: refrigerators with locking doors left at junkyards with the door on, so that children can get inside, suffocate, or starve, and die.
Moral Hazard – When a party with more information about its actions or intentions has a tendency or incentive to behave against the interests of the other party with less information. Usury, Prostitution, and Drugs are the most common moral hazards. The most common topic on law involves insurance schemes, where one is incentivized to commit arson or murder simply because one has insurance on the building or person.
Defining A Moral Hazard
The lack of incentive to guard against risk where one is protected from its consequences, lack of incentive to guard against risk where one is protected from its consequences
In Insurance. The risk, danger, or probability that the event insured against may happen, varying with the circumstances of the particular case.
In Fire Insurance. The risk or danger of the destruction of the insured property by fire, as measured by the character and interest of the insured owner, his habits as a prudent and careful man or the reverse, his known integrity or his bad reputation, and the amount of loss he would suffer by the destruction of the property or the gain he would make by suffering it to burn and collecting the insurance.
In Economics. Moral hazard occurs when an entity has an incentive to increase its exposure to risk because it does not bear the full costs of that risk.
In Tort Law – “A tiger trap presents a hazard not only to the tiger, but to man.”
In Politics …
Examples of Moral Hazard
1) If I entice you into buying drugs, I’m baiting you into a hazard, since addiction is a spiral. (Pushers)
2) If I lend you money or extend you credit to buy alcohol or drugs, creating a vicious cycle of debt and addiction.
3) If I suggest you might win at gambling (you can’t), that’s baiting you into hazard. (Gambling houses)
4) If I lend you money or extend you credit to gamble. (Bookies)
5) If I lend you money at usurious prices that will entrap you in debt cycles. (Loan Sharking)
6) If I offer you a loan to get what you want under impulse or duress, but I can extract interest from you, and then seize your property in restitution.
7) If a woman implies access to friendship, affection, or sex, in exchange for goods services favors opportunity – which she will never deliver.
8) If I promise you life after death if you obey and undermine the upper classes. (Abrahamism)
9) If I promise you salvation in heaven if you rebel against the government that is trying to create order and prosperity over the next few decades, that is baiting you into a hazard.
10) If I promise you power and equality if you undermine the political system (Marx)
11) If I promise you equality if you undermine men (feminism)
12) If I promise you status if you undermine the status hierarchy (postmodernism)
13) If I appeal to your morality and pass the hart cellar immigration act. (frankfurt school)
14) If I promise you equality or socialism when it’s genetics that cause our differences, and you act to destroy your civilization, then that’s all baiting into hazard.
15) If I promise you the end of whiteness and whites will improve your condition when it is only under whiteness – meaning sciences – and their rule that has improved your condition, and that your condition reflects that of your ancestors.
In other words, you are entering into a voluntary exchange that is not in your interests, simply because for whatever reason you are vulnerable to the trap. These are all lies that bait you into hazard (risk and loss).
Using False Promise, Pilpul, and Critique
That should cover Hazard. Now let’s deal with False Promise, Pilpul to ‘sell’ it, and Critique to undermine opposition to it:
Denial
1. Dismissal of the Evidence, History, Argument, Incentives, Norm, or Tradition
2. Evading providing a competitive, equally criticizable and testable alternative.
3. Equating Desirability-Undesirability and Approval-Disapproval or Denial with Truth and Falsehood
4. Face-Before-Truth rather than European truth-before-face, or threat to the dominance or competence hierarchy.
4. NAXALT – “Not All X Are Like That” – Denying a general rule describing a distribution is false because there are some cases at the tails.
False Promise – The most common type are psychological false promises: Life after death as Freedom from Death, followed by freedom from knowledge of one’s value to others: Marxism as Freedom from Competition for Production in the Market between Classes, Feminism as freedom from the compromise between the genders, Postmodernism as freedom from sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, freedom from paying the costs of conformity to high trust norms, traditions, institutions, and laws, and even freedom from Truth, Reason, and Science.
Pilpul – Using sophism and overloading to make excuses that convince you (sell you), baiting you into the hazard. Where sophism is a fallacious argument used deliberately to deceive. Among the sophisms are the ‘big lies” that involve the three techniques of constructing big lies that we call fictionalisms.
Why does pilpul work so effectively? Because all speech functions by incremental suggestion using continuous recursive disambiguation.
Suggestion: Using suggestion or partial information letting the audience fill in, and not
Sophistry: Conflation, Incremental Conflation, into Overloading
Loading: Adding emotional context or value judgments to influence the audience.
Framing: Adding information or incentives or narrative structure to influence the audience.
Obscuring:
Fictions: (Storytelling or Fictionalizing) into Suspension of Disbelief, Suggestion, and Overloading
Fictionalisms: Using Magic to Pseudoscience, Surrealism to Idealism, or Supernatural to Theological examples or claims.
Critique – Using undermining and sophism and deceits – particularly straw man false arguments – to undermine your due diligence or falsify the experience and evidence.
HeapingUndue Praise or Fabricated Criticism
Social Construction – Using numbers of people, propaganda, information, symbols to overload your reason and cause you to fall prey to false promise, pilpul, and critique so that our primary means of defense from falsehood – competition in a market for information with others who might disagree – is impossible.
Asymmetric Nepotism:
Nepotistic Conspiracy:
Nepotistic Supremacy:
Secrecy and Motive Secrecy:
Specializing in Distrust
Inability form productive organizations
Inability to innovate materiallyThe Importance of Asymmetry of Knowledge in Baiting Into Hazard
( … )
The Importance of Secrecy in Baiting into Hazard
( …)
Specialization in Baiting Into Hazard by False Promise of Freedom From The Laws of the Universe
So how does one or a group increase the scale of baiting into hazard from prostitution, gambling, drugs and alcohol, loansharking, black market trade, as an organized crime family, into an organized crime industry such as credit and finance, to an organized crime Nation State within a State? One shifts from baiting individuals into hazard by freedom from determinism and probability of one’s personal environment, to baiting classes and polities into hazard by freedom from the determinism of the universe itself. But what is the bait? Freedom from the Laws of The Universe.
Given the immutable Constraints of the Formal (logical), Physical (realism, naturalism, determinism, probability, scarcity), Natural (self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, kin selection), Evolutionary (genetic load, regression to the mean, natural selection, differences in group evolutionary neoteny, differences in aggression and intelligence ) Laws of the Universe, the Jews and Muslims specialize, institutionalize, and mass-produce a counter-revolution against the European, Asian, and Hindu civilizations’ spectrum of levels of success in discovering, adapting to, apply, and institutionalizing the inescapable laws of the universe – and this explains the hierarchy of civilization achievements by Europeans, East Asians, Hindustanis, and the failure of the Islamic civilization to convert it’s capture of the arts and sciences of european, north African, iranic, and Hindu civilizations, into an equally evolutionary civilization, and instead, restored fundamentalism and destroyed every civilization it had conquered, reducing it to ignorance, poverty, and dysgenia from which it cannot – because of its Abrahamic religion – seem to escape.
Primary Physics (Unsolved), Wave Density(particle) Physics, Atomic Physics, Chemistry, Biochemistry, Biology, Genetics,
And most importantly: scarcity.
The Natural Laws (Behavioral Laws Within The Limits of the Physical)
Sentience, Awareness, Consciousness, Psychology(Acquisition), Sociology(Cooperation), Economics (Cooperative Production), Politics, Warfare, Group Evolutionary Strategy
And most importantly: the self-interest of man, the amorality of man, the kin selection of man, the higher value of the ingroup to man, the difference in neoteny and rates of adaptivity, the genetic distribution of rates of adaptivity between groups.
The Evolutionary Laws (The consequence of our behavior over time)
Entropy, Efficiency, competitive reproduction; Genetic Load, Regression to the Mean, Rate of Mutation; Rate of Adaptation, Natural Selection, The Red Queen, The Window of Opportunity before a Great Filter.
Creating Plausible Deniability
( … ) How does one or a group hide from plausible deniability, and why are Europeans the only people vulnerable to it?
Hiding Behind Moral Pretense
Hiding behind Voluntary Choice
Hiding behind Sympathy for Hyper consumption (experiences)
Hiding Behind (Selective) Evasion of Responsibility
Heaping Undue Criticism (Persecution) and Undue Praise (Einstein, Holocaust industry)
Specialization in Organized Crimes Using False Promise and Baiting into Hazard
Similarly, the Jews, desperate to retain their parasitic means of existence, and incompetence at productivity, innovation, producing commons, or polities, doubled down on their production of sources of ignorance, deceit, and parasitism and producing nothing other than an organized crime family for two thousand years – until tolerated by the Europeans in the industrial revolution, at which point they immediately invented a counter-revolution against the evolutionary superiority of western civilization just as they had in the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim revolutions against the superior and evolutionary civilizations of the ancient world, specialize in industries of unaccountable, unproductive, parasitic, baiting into hazard, profiting from other’s loss, profiting from the destruction of our high trust commons, under the pretense of plausible deniability:
Selling signal goods (trinkets), gambling, prostitution, alcohol, drugs all on credit, organized black market crime, moneychanging, entrapment in loansharking, entrapment by usurious credit, entrapment into default and takings, entrapment into slavery, slaving, slaving host peoples, entrapment into political policy, entrapment into service of the state, entrapment by alliance with the state against the people, fraudulent tax farming, the purchase of productive institutions and converting them to rent-seeking institutions, nepotistic conspiracy against the people in all of the above; seeking opportunities for unproductive, unwarrantied, positions in entertainment, media, press, advertising, marketing, and the academy from which to promote their false promises and baiting into hazard; and the ultimate means of exploiting trust and profiting from others hardship by unaccountability in finance, and law – with medicine alone a virtuous pursuit.Specialization in Construction of False Promise (Hazarding)
Specialization in Construction of False Promise by using the three fictionalisms of Magic to Pseudoscience (Physical), Sophistry to Idealism (verbal), Occult(Supernatural) to Theology (intuitionistic: imaginary and emotional).
The Four Dimensions of False Promise
For each of the four sciences: The formal or logical, the physical or material, the natural or behavioral, and the evolutionary or survival, the Jews produced a set of false promises that undermine ‘sensemaking’ by undermining each of these universal laws.
False Promise of Freedom from Formal Laws (logic, truth) by the use of social construction of repetitive feedback of information counter to formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.
False Promise of Freedom from Physical Laws (scarcity, false promise of endless growth). by the false promise of endless growth, an end to scarcity, and an end to human competition by demonstrated acquisition.
False Promise of Freedom Natural Laws (of self-interest, rational choice, amorality, reciprocity, competitive organization), by the false promise of an end to kin selection, koinophillia, ethnocentrism, sex, class, subrace, and racial differences, and the sexual, social, economic, and political value of organization by ethnocentrism given the class, subrace, and subrace differences in sexual, social, economic, and political value to one another, given the substantial evolutionary difference between the races and subraces.
False Promise of Freedom from Evolutionary Laws ( ending natural, and market selection, accumulating mutation and regulation, the impossibility of isolation, inescapable regression, accumulated genetic load, dysgenia, and the red queen of resources, competitors, biological, climatological, geological, solar, and galactic risks. ).
They industrialize the sale and distribution of these false promises by the tactics of:
Faith Healing,delaying into hazard. Faith Healing consists of providing temporary psychological relief while allowing the cause to persist, grow, and evolve.
False Story Telling, baiting you into empathy, loading, framing, obscurantism, suggestion, suspension of disbelief and overloading.
False Promise, baiting into hazard. Baiting into hazard consists of making false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe. arguing them with sophistry to idealism, magic to pseudoscience, or occult to theology.
False Criticism, undermining into hazard.
Duplicitous, Double Standard, Irreciprocal, and Poly Logical Ethics, like their polylogical unequal laws,
They escalate from the least burdensome to the most burdensome tactic:
Faith healing at every opportunity (lie and deny)
Selling false promise if they can (fraud)
Evading or silencing at every necessity (shaming, moralizing, psychologizing)
Undermining if they have opportunity to (sedition)
Attack if they can get away with it (de-platforming, conspiracy)
Hiding behind plausible deniability of freedom of choice (non-coercion)
Jewish Warfare Methodology
Given low numbers, inability to hold territory, failure at state-building, cultural disposition for avoidance of productivity, and history of parasitism, the Jewish Group Strategy consists of Total War from Within, using:
“Delay, Deceive, Undermine, Sow Discord, and destroy genetic, normative, cultural, institutional capital, by disinformation, deceit, defamation, sedition, and treason, using Baiting Into Hazard, by False Promise of freedom from constraints of formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary law, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty, by Pretense of Plausible Deniability, Despite Deliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the dependence on instincts, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s) – And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (profit), Influence(power), Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conflict, Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.” In other words, they function as did the ancient fertile crescent priesthoods, faith healers, and usurers: parasitic rather than productive citizens.”
It takes a little effort to remember each of these terms, tactics, and strategy, but with a little practice you’ll find you can identify their use, and once aware of it, you’ll see that you are, we are, saturated in as much sophistry, pseudoscience, deceit, fraud and parasitism, as medieval Christians and today’s Muslims are saturated in superstition that is contrary to all evidence before them in observable reality. Because the power of social construction takes advantage of our dependence upon one another for providing commensurable, coherent, actionable explanations to the world around us. And the more empathic one’s personality traits, the more vulnerable one is to social construction because the more one’s intuition seek cooperation, consensus, conformity and non-conflict. That’s why religions survive. It’s why natural religions survive. Why theological religions survive among the less sophisticated. Why philosophical wisdom literature survives is the educated classes, and why scientific, economic, legal, and military wisdom literature survives in the most capable.
Their Method of Argument, Persuasion, Advocacy, and Propaganda.
Just as we refer to the structure of thought in Confucianism(reasonableness), Platonism (idealism), Aristotelianism (Empiricism), and Epicureanism (realism) we refer to “Abrahamism” for the argumentative technique of using Pilpul (via-positiva), and Critique (via-negativa) to construct sophisms (the argumentative equivalent of numerology and astrology) via use of loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, overloading, the Fictionalisms, appeals to reasonableness, and false promise, to create and bait high trust people into hazards.
All three Abrahamic Religions, Kantian philosophy, Marxist argument, and Postmodern thought all make use of this technique of argument, often stated as “Dialectic” but operationally consisting of Social Construction via Overloading of human reason with False Promise advanced by Pilpul (sophistry) and defended by Critique (undermining and disapproval rather than falsification).
Abrahamism: consists of undermining truth reason probability and evidence by use of False Promise, Baiting into Hazard, Pilpul (positive), Critique (negative), straw-manning, and heaping of undue praise, and propagation into social construction, to use suggestion and overloading to force individuals, groups, and polities, to appeal to your intuition rather than reason and evidence. it’s the same technique used by faith healers, priests, and con artists. And the higher a group’s trust the more susceptible they are to it.War Against Every Single Institution of Cooperation
( … classes etc …)
Makets of Cooperation ( … )The Marxists
Marxism
Bolshevism
Leninism
Trotskyism
The Neo Marxists (Cultural Marxists)
Gramsci – politics is downstream from culture and culture is downstream from education and religion is just education. countries resisted becaue they had deep culture and institutinos.
LeninismThe PostmodernistsThe NeoconsThe FeministsThe Libertarians and Anarchists
As we see in evidence by their specialization in the production of authoritarian religion,pseudoscience, sophistries, deceits, and frauds that falsely and unaccountably promise freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, again, profiting from the destruction of our high trust commons under the pretense of plausible deniability:
Cantor-Bohr in mathematical re-platonization (sophistry), Gould-Boaz-Freud in behavioral sciences (pseudoscience and historical revisionism), Marx-Lenin in political economy (the possibility of authoritarian underclass rule and violation of evolutionary law), Trotsky-Strauss-Kristol in neoconservatism to convert the USA to advance Jewish globalism, Adorno-Marcuse-Fromm (Frankfurt school) in cultural marxism to undermine European aesthetics and values, Gramsci-Derrida in postmodernism to undermine truth itself, Friedan-Steinem in anti-male, anti-familial feminism, Rand-Rothbard in anti-rule of law anti-nationalist libertarianism, and perhaps the most insidious in Raz-Kelsen-Dworkin-Hartt in positive or pseudoscientific law, in order to make European evolutionary, scientific, and neutral law devolve into Jewish pilpul (sophistry) law, relativism, and interpretation and kritarchy (rule by judges). And that’s before we address their intentional destruction of the architectural, monumental, visual, literary, and entertainment arts.War Against Every Single Discipline: Europeans vs Jews: The Pattern of Engineers (Scientists) vs Sophists (“Hucksters”)
Legend: *= Substantial Damage to Group Cognition, ( ) = Opposite Position
Discipline
European vs
Jewish
Engineering
Computation
and
Science
Many vs
Babbage vs
Turing
Galileo to Maxwell vs
?
?
? (Wolfram)
?
Economic Philosophy
Economic Science
And
And
Smith vs
Menger, (Keynes*) vs
Marshall, Hayek, Jevons vs
Mankiw, Taylor, and Cochrane vs
Physical vs
Reporting, Testimony, Fact vs
Empirical vs
Political vs
National vs
Truth (adaptation) vs
Consideration, Acceptance vs
Truth, Decidability vs
Verbal
Storytelling, Loading, and Framing
Ideal
Social
Universal
Reasonableness (non-adaptation)
Evasion, Denial
Delay, Evade, Excuse, Justify
Conflict Strategy Bias
Argument, Duel, War vs
Social Predation and Undermining
Cognitive Bias
Developmental Strategy
Male Paternal Hierarchical vs
Paternal Independence (Autonomy) vs
Evolution Of Three Generations Of Jewish Warfare
The restatement of reformed Judaism (Christianity) from supernatural to Marxist pseudoscientific:
‘Yahweh
Dialectical Materialism
Pomo/Woke/PC/HB-Denial
The Messiah
Marx
Democratic Party
The Elect
The Proletariat
The Oppressed (Non-Whites)
The Church
The Communist Party
The Woke Academy
The Second Coming
The Revolution
White Replacement / Genocide
Hell
Punishment of the Capitalists
Punishment of Whites
TheMillennium
The Communist Commonwealth
Globalism / White Minority
Mesopotamian Slavery
Centuries of Oppression
Colonialism
Conquest of Judea-Diaspora
Bolshevism USSR – Holocaust
( ??? ) – To Be Determined
– Original by Bertrand RussellSummary of the Jewish Strategy
(a) Preservation of separatism (non-integration) (Tribalism)
(b) Intolerance, maladaption, non-integration
(c) Evasion of payment for the cost of the commons (manners, ethics, morals, traditions, institutions, common property) (Free Riding);
(d) Evasion of production or productivity, and therefore contribution to the world. (free- riding)
(e) Preference for Parasitism: Profit from baiting into hazard (usury, alcohol, prostitution, slave trading, gambling, organized crime); (Parasitism)
(f) Profiting from (Undermining)
(g) Specializing in use of the state against the people (tax collection, money changing)(Corruption)
(h) Investing assets from these criminal activities into rent-seeking (non-productive parasitic returns) (Rent-Seeking);
(i) Undermining Moral and Ethical Markets and Trade: Slowly migrating capital into mixed criminal, black market, grey market, and open market industries (Undermining Markets)
(j) Undermining the information system (Propaganda)
(k) Undermining the state, the law, their knowledge, their traditions, their culture, the institutions, and their norms in order to convert the state from suppression of local rents to maximization of rents (Undermining Political Cohesion).Producing Jewish Goals Consisting of:
Racism and Identitarianism
Separatism (state within a state), (Buiding Support for Israel)
Parasitism (avoidance of braoder commons, privatizing comons)
Specialize in free riding or rent-seeking (avoid production, concentrate extracted capital)
Concentrate capital in nepotistic networks (concentration of forces)
Hazarding
Physical Degeneracy ( avoiding integration )
Financialiaztion, Gabmgling, Usury, Baiting into Hazard, Unproductivity.
Marketing and Consumerism (Propaganda, False Promise, Hyperconsumption,)
Propagandism (social construction )
Undermining
Prevent adaptation, innovation, and evolution so that parasitic extraction can be maintained by approval-disapproval, undermining-heaping of undue praise, and – this is the strategy fo the unregulated female to her children rather than producing generations capable of independent adaptation, innovation, and evolution of self economy, society, polity, knowledge and mankind.
Sedition
Propaganda, Disinformation, pseudoscience, sophstry, historical revisionism, social construction of mythology.
Fomenting destruction – like the female, utter destruction, of information, norms, tradition, values: organization that they call power.
Use all of the above to create a parasitic ‘priesthood’caste producing nothing other than a continuous system of propaganda and deceit to maintain a slave underclass with nothing but false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe – a promise that can never be fulfilled, but for which they can infinitely claim they are pursuing.
Insurrection
Rebellion (Tikkun Olam – Repairing the world (making it safe for jews))
Revolution
Murder and Destruction
Civilizational Destruction and Degeneracy
Globalism (making the world safe for rebellion, parasitism, separatism, nepotism, by eradicating other’s choice of self determination)
Framing in Political Science
In terms familiar in political science, the technical framing of Jewish Group Strategy is an attempt to rotate Out productive elites and rotate in their own parasitic elites by means of “Parasitic Clientelism” consisting of building coalitions of false promise, parasitism, dysgenia, and decline, by consuming and redistributing others accumulated capital whether genetic, civilizational, institutional, national, cultural, or normative, and generating demand for their authority as a redistributive priesthood that increases the burden of demand for individual income (ergo our present condition under global financialism). In this sense, it is no different from traditional organized crime in goods, services, and information, other than an additional degree of abstraction so that the civilizational capital is being stolen less so than private or public goods.
This ancient Jewish strategy is the very opposite of the equally ancient European group strategy of “Entrepreneurial Clientelism” of the rapid evolution of knowledge, technology, organizations, institutions, societies, markets, and man, through adversarial innovation and adaptation by the production of competitive information, services, goods, monuments, arts, and letters – all of which increases the capital of the commons, thereby performing indirect redistribution of goods, services, information, and opportunity, that reduces the burden of income of the individuals of the polity. Ergo, European innovators, producers, and the protestant work ethic, vs Jewish (Semitic) consumption of the commons by parasitism and the avoidance of all productive work, their specialization in parasitic industries.
Jewish backing of the Hart-Cellar act, reversing the centuries of European, British and American market eugenics, and the Darwinian limitation of immigration especially from 24 to 65, and sponsorship of massive third world immigration despite Ethnic European promises that wouldn’t be the case, serves the Jewish strategy of Parasitic Clientelism after Marxist clientelism failed in its competition with rule of law consumer capitalism. What was unexpected was the ability of Jews to turn young American women into equally parasitic clients with the invention of the pill, and subsequent no fault divorce, with the predictable consequences of the destruction of the family, family capital, and rates of reproduction.
Note the use of economic and legal analysis that eliminates the possibility of moral relativism, and the possibility of moral justification. These are crimes, and acts of war by sedition from within host populations. They are not moral opinions. They are facts that explain the depth of the thefts from host peoples, and the long chain of harms that result. Framing In Economics and Political Economy – Explaining the 2oth Century Hyper-consumption – Civilizational Baiting Into Hazard
( … )
The banking crisis as baiting into moral hazard
Socialism as baiting into moral hazard
Social Security as baiting into moral hazard
Medicare Medicaid as not baiting into moral hazard
Slow Deceptive Jewish War vs Fast Declarative European War: War is Still War No Matter The Speed
We see evidence of their strategy of Incremental Undermining by Delay and Deceive. Where the Chinese rely on their cultural institution of the ancient method of “Accumulate Forces by Delay and Deceive from Without” the Jews likewise rely on their cultural and religious institution of the ancient female method of “Accumulate Clients(dependents) and Assets and Undermine Incrementally by using Delay and Deceive From Within.” (The “boil the frog” strategy). This is why zero tolerance must be a constitutional requirement.
So it’s a mistake to label either Judaism or Islam as primitive. It’s as advanced a system of Deception and Harm as Greek Reason And Mathematics and Roman Institutions. It’s the ultimate end of female warfare, just as Europeans – at least until the postwar period – practice the ultimate end of male warfare.
Jewish Warfare in the Context of Semitic Civilization’s Method of Warfare
The three stages of Abrahamic Semitic method of conquest of the evolutionary peoples by conversion and conquest of women and underclasses (those yet not ‘domesticated into agency’).
Stage 1 – Small external population (vanguard) undermines the main by straw man criticism and ridicule of the organization and its categories relations and values The purpose of Judaism is subjugation (submission). (Judaism – GOSSIP: Reputation Destruction)
Stage 2 – The population is undermined into submission by sale of a false promise – the verbal equivalent of a physical drug. The purpose of Christianity is subjugation (submission). (Christianity – FRAUD: Selling a false promise ).
Stage 3 – The major external population conquers the submitted through raiding the trade routes, immigration, conversion, and conquest and population replacement. The purpose of Islam is subjugation (submission). (Islam – FORCE).
“Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, and Islam to destroy.”
“Judaism to undermine, Marxism, Postmodernism, Woke/PC to weaken, and Declared Anti-Whiteness, and Immigration to destroy”
The consequence is the reversal of civilization of the hierarchical pack and the restoration of primitivism of the equalitarian herd. Producing a genetic, cultural, and institutional race to the bottom.
Abrahamic grammars of pilpul and critique are simply well-constructed lies that through repeated use produce an addiction response, the same way that membership in (submission to) the pack or tribe produces an addiction response.
Women are the most vulnerable because they evolved to be irrationally dependent upon the ‘cover’ of the herd. The underclass as well. the less capable classes out of utility. The middle class out of profit from it, and the upper class replaced by a priesthood (frauds) rather than a military (science).
It’s a Very Simple Process once understood. Evil. Brilliant. There is a reason throughout history, and until the Victorian age, women were considered the root of all evil – disloyalty, and sedition, gossiping and undermining, shrills. And there is a reason that historically the number of women in asylums was similar to the number of men in prison: because the sexes demonstrate warfare, conflict, cooperation, and cognition, by female verbal emotional and social versus male physical political and military means.
It’s Not Money Alone But Dominance Expression
heroism in cheating
It’s not Dominance alone but Warfare
( … )
It’s Not Just War but the Total War of the Semites, Not the Martial War of the Europeans
The Culture of War – A Product of Group Strategy
Rock Paper Scissors of Civlizational Differences in war: Endure (India), Trade (europe), Conquest (China), Undermining (Semitia) … Notice I rely on ternary logic at all times, whether it be undecidable, truth candidate, or false, the three
“You must fight wars on your terms, not the enemy’s but you must defeat the enemy on his terms not yours.”
The Laws of Nature, and the Natural Law and the Organized application of science, law, and violence to force correspondence with them, in order to complete the transformation of man in to the immortal gods mastering nature that he imagined.
Chinese Total War by Comparison
( … )
Thousands Of Years of Revolt Against Aristocratic Meritocratic Productive and Evolutionary Peoples
All of these techniques of Jews and Muslims consist of thousands of years of revolts against the laws of the universe, (of the indo European Persians, Anatolians and Europeans) and the European institutions that discover, adapt to, apply and institutionalize them, and the unique and extraordinary ability of European civilization to drag mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, the tyranny of man, and the vicissitudes of a nature all but hostile to advanced life, in a few centuries in the prehistoric bronze, ancient iron, and modern steel ages.
We face over 2000 years of systemized hatred of European people, our history, heroes, literature, arts, culture, institutions, for suppression of non-productivity, poly-logical asymmetric ethics, and their specialization in parasitism from within by profiting from baiting into hazard, hedonism, hyper-consumption, discord, conflict, and dysgenia, and hiding behind plausible deniability because of our fundamental right to self-determination, freedom of speech, and truthful, reciprocal, adversarial competition in markets for ideas.
Anti-Whiteness, Critical Race Theory, Anti-Aristocracy, Anti-Military, Anti-Colonialism, Anti-Christianity, Freud-Boaz-Gould pseudoscience, Marxism, Neocon, Pomo, Libertarian, Anti-Family Feminism, Anti-Rule of Law Positive Law, Anti Democratic Judicial Activism, Anti-Testimonial Truth, PC/Woke
So for ‘emancipation’ (freedom from suppression), it’s not enough for a group to abandon its religion, or to secularize its religion, or language, but it must abandon its group strategy, mythology, judgment of history, their method of influence, persuasion, argument, and laws. It must abandon all but its foods.
Marx and Braun, in the debate over the emancipation of the Jews, in Marx’s “The Jewish Question”, attracted the attention Isaac Deutscher who answers in similar terms, “that idea of socialism and of the classless and stateless society expressed in the essay is as universal as Spinoza’s ethics and God”. A less technical than the present analytic and operational, description of the same observations I’ve made here.
Benjamin Ginsberg’s “Fatal Embrace” takes a defensive position explaining how Jews seek protection from the people by alliance with the state against the interests of the people – but fails to account for either Marx and Deutscher’s observations, that (a) the people need an incentive to despise them, (a) usurious and extractive 300% interest simply because the economy was dependent on hard money (money proper, commodity money) is enough incentive to produce that hatred, (b) but that European communities dependent on social cohesion are even more resentful of traitors among them (c) slaving, usury, alcohol and prostitution on credit bait the fragile into further suffering (d) specialization in parasitic and unaccountable occupations that require public trust, and (e) exploitation of the population, (D) and the universal treatment of just in every host country, and that this problem has resulted in persecutions everywhere in the world since at least the fourth century bc.
Solzhenitsyn’s 200 Years Together provides insight into the Jews of Russia and the pale, who despite being given land, multiple times, were considered lazy and unproductive and always reverted to the same parasitic criminal occupations that baited the people into hazards.
(I came to my understanding from prosecuting multiple Jewish families for various forms of racketeering, mortgage fraud, investment fraud, mail and wire fraud, tax fraud, criminal coercion, and legal and process abuses, and from my early work in the automation of (weak AI) legal arguments, documents, and docket management. But my later work in scientific method, legal and economic thought convinced me, like Deutscher, that the problem was universal, institutional, cultural, and possibly genetic – not religious, since every one of those I helped prosecute was secularized if not atheist.)
Jewish Warfare by Intention, Institutions and Culture, Consequence of Group Strategy, Or Evolutionary Instinct
It doesn’t have to be intentional. It’s the human female strategy of warfare against dominant males to control their reproductive choice. And the use of female means of conflict explains why in the roman age, Christianity spread among women and slaves, and only to men later once political power was available by making use of Christian organizations. And it explains the failure of marxism in the west by fomenting male class envy, and success under cultural marxism, postmodernism, and feminism, in turning enough women in the population that under democracy – an only turning men once political power was available through the defection of enough women to use the institutions to destroy the European civilization’s institutions, traditions, values, norms, history, rule of law, military culture, civil society, education, and Christian religion by the use of legal attacks on the constitution, and pseudoscientific religious conversion of the academy, media, and entertainment to the state.
For The Immoral And Unscrupulous it’s Profitable
( … ) henry ford quotes
But For Elites It’s Intentional – And We Can Take People At Their Word
While at most times, we practice our group strategy our of habit and repeat it through institutions, tradition, norm, and moral tropes. In any civilization, any society within it, in every great era of change within it, there emerge a few thought leaders that do understand a group’s mission and strategy and explain it. Burke … Spengler … and my technical expression of it. We have failed for the full scope of the twentieth century the question is why? ( darwin )
And for Some Jewish Elites It’s IntentionalAnd Jews don’t Constrain their Elites – Because They’re Not Moral, Only as moral as require to get away with it.Evolutionary Context
Demale dysgenic strategy reversing evolutionary gains. ( … ) without providing female reproductive returns – just the opposite, limiting western reproduction.
Evolution provided women with verbal means of warfare just like it provided men with physical means of warfare. And in all statistics both criminal and mental illness, and in all forms of political speech, and even in all forms of argument and discourse, men bias to truth and falsehood under physical threat, and women bias to approval and disapproval under threat of undermining.
Men are Political and Military super predators but Women are Social and Political super predators. This is the reason for women’s disenfranchisement from political participation in history, and the reason for women‘s historical reputation as the root of all evil “discord”.
Europeans are productive male superpredators, and Jews are parasitic female superpredators, with the only difference being that Europeans dominated the production of beneficial rewards for mankind, and jews and Arabs dominated the production of harms to mankind.
There is only one civilization open to internal competition between elites – the west. And so we see two competing elites from two different races. The Europeans function as the male cognitive and strategic elites maintaining adaptation and the Jews function as the female cognitive and strategic elites resisting adaptation. And the Muslims as the competing males in the adjacent territory, trying to expand their territory.
Technically, Ashkenazim – the European Jews – are partly European. With about one in two-hundred european introgression into the european jews. And originating in diasporic male Jews moving to Rome (ie: new york), marrying local european women, then returning to inbreeding (consanguninity). Genetically, Jews are indistinquishable from palestinians and other north semitic peoples in a spectrum between the north mesopotamian-levantine and the south arabic bedouin. Morovere jewish cognnitive exceptionalism is due to (a) european ingression, (b) Polygyny, and (c) upward redistribution of reproduction to Rabbis (d), and (e) bottlenecking from repeated retaliations against them (repressions) for their crimes against host peoples.
Genetics, Religion, Institutions, Culture or All Of The Above
Whether Jewish and Muslim behavior originates in culture, religion, or genetics or a mixture of all three is as yet unknown but will be uncovered within the next few decades. Long-Standing evidence suggests that regardless of origin it’s genetic – beginning with no less than Aesop in his fable of Hermes and the Cart of Lies, to the difference in average aesthetics, speech pattern, and verbal versus mechanical aptitude, to the difference between European intuitions that favor reciprocity and high trust commons (middle-class market ethics of assumed honor of warranty of freedom from externality), and Jewish intuitions that favor irreciprocity ( in ethics of the Bazaar under assumed virtue of cunning of gains by externality) in low trust commons – and the resulting inability of middle easterners, in general, to form large scale institutions without clientelistic incentives, including successful states, as is common in all of Europe and at least in bureaucratic China.
European People’s Unique Susceptibility to Jewish Warfare From Within and Without
Convincing Europeans of their own immorality, Falsely Positioning Jewish Ethics as Moral, Europeans Destroying themselves Through Altrustic Punishment, largely by women, by claiming oppression rather than continuing the domestication of man by baiting into the false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe, reversing european radical rapid evolution and the benefits to mankind.
Regarding Guilt Based Tolerance Because of Our Altruism
So in response to the opening question of our discussion, the guilt-based narrative can’t survive for a number of reasons:
1 – The World War Two generation is almost gone and with it their sentiments – reinforced by their many hard sacrifices.
2 – The technique of undermining and distracting from discourse and debate by accusations (shaming) of Racism, Colonialism, Slavery, and Nazis, has been exhausted through overuse.
3 – The accumulated evidence of the Jewish postwar repetition of 2000 years of their strategy is as undeniable today as it was at every other period, in every other country, throughout all of history – most blatantly in today’s DC-New York-LA, France, and Ukraine – that caused their repeated evictions from the country after country – and bloodshed when they weren’t – especially by their abuse of the people of Ukraine, Russia, their Bolshevism in Russia, their Communism in Germany and the Austro Hungarian Empire, and the consequences when their propaganda was imitated in every other country that suffered it.
4 – Centuries of work by multiple authors not the least of which include Marx, Nietzsche, Solzhenitzen, and most recently and thoroughly Kevin Macdonald.
MacDonald’s work is seminal – though he’s paid a high price for his efforts. So has Ricardo Duchesne whose epic explanation of European Group Strategy from philosophical and literary history. I’m loathe to mention Hick’s seminal work on Postmodernism, because while equal in value, I want to protect him from implication of intentional association that might impose equal costs upon him. My contribution to the subject is equal exposition of the group evolutionary strategy of europeans, comparative group evolutionary strategy, comparative methods of argument, and the primacy of economics, law, and warfare in group strategies rather than the literary tradition that Macdonald, Duchesne, and Hicks have covered in depth.
Because a people who hold territory must institutionalize behavior, norms, economies, and institutions, that construct sufficient commons for persistence and defense, and people who parasitically extract from those peoples can exploit that necessity to produce commons – by privatizing them.
European Failure of Self Defense Against False Promises Baiting Into Hazard
Unfortunately, as an army of a universal militia, our European excellence in Military warfare is offset by our European weaknesses in defense against Total War, whether by Jews internally, Muslims internally and externally, and now Chinese Externally. Why?
1 – Failure to defend Virtue signal spiraling by baiting into altruistic punishment – crossover from Christianity
2 – Failure to ( low ethnocentrism, homogeneity, church domestication, outbreeding, manorialism above the line ) – and failure to institutionalize this as the Russians have recently done.
3 – Failure to understand our unique high trust institutions and our unique underlying group strategy – as the only group strategy that didn’t fail to survive agrarianism without seeking to evade the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.
(Note: Don’t underestimate the importance of that statement. It’s still possible that ‘the obsessive pursuit of Christian values in exchange for mindfulness from virtue signaling is nearly as bad as the Jewish and Muslim devolutionary values, and Christian universalist ethics without pairing with european aristocratic martial and nationalist adversarial competition, is equally likely to prevent mankind from passing through the Great Filter. By and large the aristocracy used Christianity as a *justification for* continued Steppe Aryanism.
Instead, the lesson we must take from our analysis of history is that Christianity made the drudgery of peasant agrarianism tolerable and inspirational, even while aristocratic adversarialism and rapid evolution continued in the upper classes.
In the ancient world men were treated like any other domesticated animal until they proved themselves worthy of freedom – meaning trust to do no harm. Just as the industrial revolution lifted the peasantry into the greater economy, Christianity made it possible to shift from a domesticated animal into citizen – not by achievement, but by non-aggression, and ‘doing no harm’. This was a technological innovation in social organization at the time – and remains so. Because Christianity solved the problem of the prisoners’ dilemma of cooperation – where the only solution is exhausting forgiveness. This solution is one of the reasons why Christian societies more easily transform into commercial modernity: their religion taught them to treat one another as we treat potential customers in every market of voluntary cooperation available to man.
Had Christianity integrated into the pagan cults preserving empirical european aristocracy and traditions rather than seeking to replace it with an oriental superstitious church as rulers, then it might not have lost a thousand years to a dark age, and as expected the industrial revolution would have occurred sometime before the Muslim destruction of the ancient world. In this sense, Judaism and the jewish invention of systemic deceit By false promise is the greatest crime in human history for both it’s catastrophes in the ancient world and the modern.)
4 – Failure to write down in ‘sacred’ text, our (complex) group strategy as law as have competitors.
(As I have partly outlined here and addressed more fully elsewhere, The works of aristotle, epicurus, hobbes, lock, smith hume, the federalist papters, and our british and american constitutions were good starts. They were only good starts. ).
5 – Our Presumption that other peoples of the world are willing and able to also adopt this strategy.
(They are demonstrably neither. The general understanding of the differences in the races as a series of at least for isolation events creating a series of speciation events, each of which increased neotenic evolution, exchanging decreases in aggression for increases in intelligence, and the resulting demographic composition of the civilizations, is continously evident in the relative ranking of world states by every single metric we are capable of gathering. As such even western civilization isn’t necessarily avvailable below our working classes – and we have the best most ethhica moral high trust working classes in the world. For the rest of the world, presuming education is their passport to advanced lifestyles, this is a false promise, since those achievers are held down not by their own abilities, but by the demographics of their own countries.)
6 – Failure to Reform the Christian or at least Catholic Churches toward Rational Natural Law and the Christian dogma and history as evolutoinary progress from faith to reason to science, and the evidence of christian ‘correctness’ and ‘approximate truth’ by the evidence of that progression, and legitimization of christianity over all other religion just as legitimization of reason and science over all the alternatives.
7 – Our Pre-Christian tolerance(Indo-Germanic, West Indo European, Aryan) because of our founding principles of self-determination and adversarialism producing competitive markets in all aspects of life. And our Christian Tolerance does not permit us the intolerance necessary to fight Total War across the spectrum of immigration, conversion, sedition, treason by informational, cultural, religious, financial, economic, and physical warfare.
(The Culture of War by Van-Creveld, and The History of Warfare by Keegan, and Trust by Fukuyama and Fourth Generation Wafare by Lind are necessary political literacy. However, only Lind correctly addresses urgency of the reality that van creveld explaind and predicted: that our culture ritualized warfare, and domesticated it incrementally through the Westphalian Peace that made states responsible for all actors within their realm thereby creating a monopoly of force in the central state, then domesticating war more so in the post world war era with the declaration of human rights – a benificent sounding bit of political theatre whose sole purpose was to limit states to existing borders, and the modernization of their own people, now that capture of territory for agrarian production was no longer the only method of improving a group’s condition. So westerners have ritualized warfare and narrowed it to wars of states. But this was a mistake. War can be conducted against any physical, institutional, religious, economic, cultural, normative, informational, asset upon which a people depend. And the age of the european domestication of warfare ended with the end of the American world redistribution of the civilizational miricale of the British Empire and vast European asymmetric demographic, human capital, institutional, and technological, advantages in empirical mind, empirical isntitutions, empirical law, and the agrarian, financial, commercial, trasportational, industrial, technolgical, medical, and informational sequence of revolutions. We are once again in an age of Total War with democracy a weakness under the burden of European populations full of marxst, postmodernist, feminist, woke-pc, anti-colonial, anti-whitness (empiricism), tolerance for judaism and islam and all else, and their false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe.)
8 – Our failure to understand and institutionalize in philosophy and law that religions, the mythology of those religions, the laws in those religions – all reflect a group evolutionary strategy – and that group evolutionary strategies are hostile to one another because that is their reason for existence. And that as such non-Christian (non-european) religions are methods of warfare. And that religions other than Christian, Germanic-Slavic pagan martial heroic, and Germanic-Slavic heathen-maternal nature) must not invade European civilization and undermine or compete from within.
Just as All Non-Natural (mand made) Religion is just as much of a means of warfare by sedition against a out group evolutionary strategy as it is a means of warfare to preserve group evolutionary strategy. And without a monarchy, or m ore rigorous constitution, westerners ahve no defense against devolutionary and dysgenic religions that are hostile to our unique discovery of rapid adaptation and evolution. Freedom of religion should have been instituted as freedom of Christian and pre-Christian European Religions, and religious tolerance is a greater mistake than tolerance for non-european non-upper-middle-class immigration. Any student of MacDonald’s trilogy, or my work on comparative group strategies, and means of perpetuating and arguing them, can no longer make the argument in favor of freedom of religion – only in favor of state mandate of doctrine.
9 – Our failure, especially during the 19th century, to code into law the evidentiary criteria for truthful, reciprocal, speech, in matters public, to the public – and to restore our Common Law Universal Standing in matters of the Commons, when combined with industrialization in all forms of communication, enabled the Jewish reformation of sophistry and false promise by the supernatural religion into sophistry and false promise by pseudoscience into a new secular pseudoscientific religion of even more virulent potential for another dark age.
(I’ve provided elsewhere the legal means, in legal form, for formal strict construction (from soveriegnty and reciprocity) of origionalist, textualist, legislation for outlawing all aspects of the jewish and muslim group strategies of total war in general, and in specific, by prevention of the techniques illustrated above that are juridical criteria for claims of truthful, testimonial, reciprocal speech, and enumerating the prohibitions on the imposition of costs by externality.).
10 – Our present failure to revolt and demand the restoration of our natural rights as European peoples – because there is no scientific, truthful, reciprocal moral reason to deny them that does not equally grant us the reciprocal scientific, truthful, reciprocal, and moral right of conquest of those who rebel against us.
Our country was founded by revolution and the founding documents provide the justification for revolution when necessary. There is no non-revolutionary means for redress of these grievances because (a) the public has no standing in matters of the commons without the gatekeeper of a senator or representative; (b) the total war against our people has been disproportionately successfy due to massive immigration; (c) Jewish clientelism has succeeded in controling the public discourse,by directing their parasitic gains to the control of commuication systems and media; and (d) the politicians, political parties, political activists, the federal bureaucracies, are demonstrably clientelle of the global and national financial sector. (d) the only solution is restoration of the constitution by the devolution of the centralization of the federal government to the several states, and the culling of the central bureaucracy, disempowering the unproductive sectors (politicians, political parties, political activists, federal buruacracies) and therefore the incomes and assets of those who pay for those clients at the expense of the people.
11 – Our relative inability to revolt, limited understanding of value of and limits of democracy, lack of the basic concept of political and revolutionary, strategy and tactics. Rebellion without specific actionable demands merely baits you into the hazard that they have created for you. Leadership must have a strategy of escalating demands, that are used to control the discourse, and are chanted with every action
(Why? Because of the demilitarization and demasculinization of the Post Eisenhower generations due to the postwar Jewish attack on our institutions from within. The prewar elimination of ‘looting’ as a means of compensation for troops. The emphasis on bureaucracy, techology, and combined arms rather than riflemen. The elimination of physical fitness in preparation for military service from our education system. The mixing of boys and girls and the ‘dubming down’ of boys by removal of adversarial competition to accomodate girls. The increase in uncompetitive verbal testing to ameliorate academic differences between boys and girls. The suppression by women in education of adversarial studies of geography, history, war, politics, ‘logic, grammar, and rhetoric’, or any semblance of the study of the long hard evolution of european empirical institutions; the relativism of institutional comparisons as if theyd idn’t matter rather than that institutional differences have overwhelming consequences. And in the absence of majority farmers and merchants for whom basic economics is a matter of daily life – the suppression of economic education and knoweldge to simplify the indoctrination of children into the false promise of democratic and state socialism. And the subsequent demonization of rule of law by the mislabeling it with the arbitrary Marxist term “capitalism”. The suppression by women in education of adversarialism in the classroom which is what causes males to invest in themselves and society.The dumbing down of education to obscure the genetic differences in rates of development and learning between grops. And our general ignorance and cowardice of youg men not evolved under adversarial conditions to traditional european aristocratic hyper competition.)
The Policy of Containment versus The Myth of Oppression
The Myth of Oppression And The Demand for Adaptation to Physical, Natural, and Evolutionary Laws within the limits of the group’s strategy.
Throughout history the myth of oppression is just that a myth. Instead, just as we contained Christianity and then failed, just as we contained Islam for 1400 years, just as we contained bolshevism, just as we contained fascism to resist bolshevism, and just as we contained the communist movement, just as we contained the soviets, just as we have tried to contain the Islamist movement, just as we are trying to contain the Chinese Imperial movement, just as we are now trying to contain the Turkish Muslim and Iranian Muslim movements, we contained the Jewish movement throughout history. And the bolsheviks and the soviets were the only time the jews gained access to power to implement their culture at scale. Most of our history consists of trying to contain authoritarian, non-market, anti-rational, anti-scientific and much larger populations to self-determination, markets, reason, and science. Despite the women and underclasses within, and the hordes without. And the simple reason is that we, the Japanese-Koreans, alone can trust one another, because of our defeat of tribalism, because of our homogeneity, and because of our empirical monarchies. The three outliers today are (a) the gypsies that practice organized petty crimes, (b) the jews that practice organized social and political crimes of undermining, ( c) the Muslims that practice organized crimes of psychological undermining. With the rest of the world practicing traditional warfare.
PART V – WHAT CAN BE DONE?
Lessons Learned
The painful truth we learn from this? We must organize our society, nations, and civilization for Total War, not just Military War as we practice between ourselves. Secondly, we must swallow the bitter medicine that the Fascists were right. And as the present example, the Chinese have adopted fascism – not communism or socialism. The Russians less so. And increasingly the Indians are hinting at this direction. And they have justly done so, to defend against ethnic Europeans who have been captured by and defeated by Jewish undermining, and to defend against Muslims and Jews and themselves.
However, unlike the positivist fascists who must proscribe positive legal rules (what must be done), we can now proscribe negative legal rules (what must not be done) of truth and reciprocity under the law, and eradicate these seditions from within, preserving our rapid evolutionary advantage and our great prosperity under it. (I’ve written most of the constitution over for those purposes). So it is possible to have a Fascism of the via-negativa law that preserves our civilization and its a unique strategy, rather than a Fascism of via-positiva authoritarian command that eventually equally weakens us stagnation has weakened others. Unfortunately, for historical reasons I have explained elsewhere, with their century of pseudoscience, the Jews innovated in dysgenic non-adaptive false promise and deceit faster than we innovated in eugenic adaptive, truth and reciprocity.
As far as I know, I understand the group evolutionary strategy of European Civilization (and at least Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, and Chinese) as well or better than anyone living today. And European civilization is unique, in that our civilizational strategy is most innovative, adaptive, and evolutionary – because our institutions are most innovative, adaptive, and evolutionary – because our founding principles are most tolerant of continuous adaptation – because our unconscious presumptions, language, norms, traditions, and institutions, are by far the least divergent from and most adherent to, the formal (logical), physical, natural(behavioral), and evolutionary laws of the universe. Conversely, except for the Chinese, who strangely choose to retrench rather than conquer the world, all other civilizations failed the criteria for passing the great filter: acceptance of the necessity for continuous evolution.
We must adapt, not demand enemies adapt to us. Judaism (parasitism), Islam (predation) systematically produce falsehood, ignorance, superstition, dysgenia, and decline, and have produced in and of themselves almost nothing that was not captured from Europeans, Iranics, or indo-Iranics, that they prey upon under the guise of religion that is nothing more than warfare against the laws of the universe – producing the expected results.
We have only these choices in order of escalation:
1 – Use the Law: Outlaw the many crimes possible by the Abrahamic method of false promise, baiting into hazard, hiding behind plausible deniability, and demand for Jewish religious legal and cultural reform, equally prohibiting the Abrahamic methods of parasitism and deceit.
2 – Legislate A Great Silence: ending Jewish public speech in all forms
3 – Restoration of the prohibition from institutional participation whether in state, academy, media, finance, law, and property ownership.
4 – Restoration of the bans on Jews and Judaism (And Islam) in western civilization.
5 – Forcible repatriation.
5 – War.
So my advice to Europeans is the most peaceful: to demand the Legislatures outlaw these techniques of organized crime, and that the first set of demands in the necessary series of reforms – and revolution if necessary – is to legislate political affiliation as a protected class, and political speech as protected speech. The issuing additional demands for prohibition of the crimes against our people and restitution and punishment for those crimes, until we have enough control to end the enemy’s strategy forever, by nationalizing consumer credit at zero interest, nationalizing insurance as a non-profit, and nationalizing pensions as non-profits, and as are the Chinese, nationalizing investment in the production of competitive capital intensive industries, retaining partial interest in those investments, funding the government more from its economic returns, while impoverishing the ancient enemy for eternity, and driving them either elsewhere or into productive work. And this would be in the interest of both parties, and the world. Because Israel, if populated by American and European Jews, would have a population, population density, and an economy equal to that of the Netherlands, and given the evidence of their conversation to technological excellence upon owning their own country, will, over generations, reform them out of parasitic diasporic separatism, and into nationalists like they rest of the world. And to function as the ‘germany’ of the Middle East – dragging their peers slowly into modernity. Especially if the crimes of the Jews are as well documented and taught as the consequences of european conquest of the world. So that the Jews have neither the opportunity nor incentive to continue their warfare against others.
First Demands: Freedom of Testimonial Speech
Europeans were the only people to succeed in developing truth-before-face regardless of cost, rule of law, reason, empiricism, science, technology, relatively uncorrupt government, and large scale private organizations – and these achievements require verbal reciprocity by truthful, testifiable, empirical speech.
1. All Political Preference, affiliation, and self-identification shall be Protected Class.
2. All Political Speech shall be Protected Speech.
3. The Restoration of Common Law Defamation for any falsehood whether intended or implied and regardless of harm.
4. The Restoration of Common Law requirement for testimonial (witnessed) speech in public to the public in matters public.
5. The Restoration of Common Law liability for Interference in commerce, records, marriage, or personal life, limiting us to honest market competition, and honest resolution of differences in court, producing continuous positive suppression of irreciprocity in all walks of life, and forcing our competition and dominance expression into the production of virtuous cycles of increasing the capital of the Commons.
6. The statute codification of Testimonial Speech as satisfying the criteria for testifiability (witness), and any truth claim to satisfy the criteria of the Physical Laws by (a) realism (b) naturalism, (c) operationalism, Formal Laws by (a) categorical and (b) internal consistency, NaturalLaws by (a) rational self-interest, (b) reciprocity), Evolutionary (), Complete (), Warrantable (), and Restitutable ().
The result will be a profound restoration of our civilization by organic, market means as we use the common law courts and threat of court to profit from the suppression of sedition across the spectrum, immediately reforming (and economically collapsing) entertainment, media, reporting, political, academic, and educational speech.
That’s all we have to achieve, and it’s a position on the moral high ground, that by and large will disempower most of the strategy and tactics of sedition.
Second Demands: Nationalization of Consumer Credit, and Strategic Investment
Nationalizaton of consumer credit, and conversion to zero interest. Nationalization of pension funds. Nationalization of Insurance and insurance holdings. Nationalization of College and University Funds and Endowments. Use of those funds an endowments to pay down student loans – at least in STEM degrees. Nationalization of Black Rock. Nationalization of the Fed and all fed assets into the treasury. Establishment of independent national investment administration.
Third Demands:
Centralization of price negotiation for medicine, goods, and services. Centralized funding of hospitals construction and maintenance at zero interest. Conversion of hospitals to local ownership and administration. Central insurance of catastrophic care. (Half of medical costs are waste). Return staffing levels and customer service to local medical delivery staff.
Results
These three sets of demands, when coupled with radical education reform (which we’ve covered elsewhere) will increase national revenues by well over 1/3 and over time, double them, while at the same time restoring the possibility of one income families, multi-generational families, at the cost of the parasitic and predatory financial, insurance, pension, academic, and media industries, and restore truthful reciprocal speech in public discourse, so that rational democracy is possible for the common people of common means.
Alternative Demands
Separation
Alternative if Demands Fail
civil war
In Closing
There is no moral justification for the deprivation of others of self-determination by self-determined means free of negative externalities against the demonstrated interests of others. Conversely there is moral justification for ending the self determination of those whose self determined means is achieved by negative externalities against the demonstrated interests of others, and even more so for parasitism or predation.
If we cannot speak the truth, we cannot negotiate
If we cannot negotiate, we cannot settle
If we cannot settle we cannot share a polity
If we cannot share a polity we must separate
If we cannot separate we must fight a civil war
Nation Building and Multiculturalism are impossible because they are mutual exclusions.
I don’t advocate separation for separation’s sake.
I advocate separation because we do not and cannot negotiate.
I advocate separation because we will not and cannot settle.
I advocate separation because we cannot share a polity.
I advocate separation because I don’t want our children to face war.
And because no moral man tolerates sedition or treason against his people – even more so than war.
No More Lies.
Summary Poster
Common Tactics in Abrahamism
Civilizational Destruction from Within;
Instigating Construction of Internal Spirals of Capital Rivalry, Consumption, Destruction;
By Baiting into Hazard (certain risk);
Those who are ignorant, or lack agency;
By use of False Promise (circumvention of reality);
Under the persuasion by Sophism (pilpul);
Justified by Critique (lie, criticism, straw—manning)
Under the cover of Moral Pretense (lie);
Under the cover of Plausible Deniability (lie);
For the purpose of profiting (by harm)
From the consumption of accumulated capital (undermining): truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes,
By not specializing in,
… The production of innovation in goods services information, both private and common
Where one’s display word and deed is Warrantied
And instead by specialization in fields permitting Export of Risk And Absent Warranty
Including:
… Gossip for Undermining (Entertainment, Media, News, Opinion)
… Informational Destruction (Academy)
… Government (Facilitation of Conflict)
… Legislation
… … (Undermining by,
… … … Facilitation of Conflict,
… … … Facilitating Dissolution of norms, traditions, manners, ethics morals,
… … … Facilitation of Parasitism, Capital exhaustion)
… Rent—Seeking (special interests)
… Corruption (influence)
… Undermining the law (specialization in undermining the constitution via the courts)
… Law (specialization in coercion)
… Finance (Parasitism and entrapment)
… Tax and accounting (evasion)
… Marketing and Advertising (scams and undermining)
… Sales Scams
… Commercial Trade in Scams physical, service, and informational
… Black Market Goods, services, and Information.
… Check Cashing
… Loan Sharking
… Gambling
… Pornography
… Prostitution
… Drug Dealing
Thereby;
… creating conflict,
… destroying trust,
… generating demand for restitution
… generating demand for authority,
And authority that recursively issues another iteration of
… false promise,
… baiting into hazard
Causing a Continuous Conflict Spiral
And Tragedy of the Commons (Conflict for consumption)
until all accumulated assets, including:
… genetic,
… cultural,
… normative,
… artistic,
… economic,
… institutional and
… political;
have been consumed;
by the conflict between classes and interests;
and by the expansion of the underclasses;
whose numbers, invasion, reproduction, consumption, agitation, had been previously limited by;
… productivity, property, market, law, and natural aristocracy;
… And the surplus proceeds from production devoted to the production of commons;
… Providing the asymmetric returns on those commons.
Where Abrahamic Argument Consists of:
Stating or Implying a False Promise, (of escape from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws)
Without provision of Warranty, (skin in the game)
For the purpose of Baiting into Moral Hazard, (failure)
Where one can profit from others’ loss, by
Murder,
Violence,
Theft,
Fraud,
Free Riding,
Socialization of Losses,
Privatization of The Commons,
Conspiracy,
Statism,
Conversion,
Immigration,
Conquest
Persuaded or Argued by “Pilpul” consisting of the
Sophisms of:
Loading,
Framing,
Suggestion,
Conflation (!!)
False Dichotomy
False Equivalency
Double Standards
Cherry Picking
Obscurantism,
Overloading,
and the Fictionslisms of:
Innumeracy
Idealism,
Pseudoscience
“Magic”
Supernaturalism, and
Deceit,
Appealing to:
NAXALT (‘not all x are like that’)
Optimisms or Pessimisms as Medians (outliers)
Reasonableness (limiting to interpersonal)
Morality (limiting to global)
Face (Status, Reputation, Honor)
Norms (what others do)
Authority (scripture, law)
Instead of:
Truth or Falsehood
Rationality vs Irrationality (self interest)
Reciprocity or Irreciprocity
Probability or Improbability
Possibility or Impossibility
And defended by “Critique”, consisting of:
Heaping of Undue Praise on Straw Men (positive)
Criticism by Straw Manning (negative), and
Poisoning the Well (Polluting the Informational Commons)
and GSRRM (denial, disapproval, ridicule, shaming, reputation destruction), consisting of:
denial
disapproval,
shaming
outraging
ridicule,
shaming,
moralizing,
psychologizing,
reputation Destruction
rallying,
gossiping,
and reputation destruction –
Demonstrating
deceit,
distraction, and
disapproval
Instead of:
True of False argument,
Or Fully Informed Agreement or Disagreement
Thereby
Advancing a falsehood on one hand, and
Attacking the person rather than argument on the other.
In order to obscure:
lying,
cheating,
stealing, to directly lie, cheat, steal, or
baiting into hazards from which they can
lie cheat and steal under cover of
ambiguity and
pretense of ignorance, and
pretense of innocence for the harm done.
Includes: 1. Ridicule, Shaming, Moralizing, Psychologizing, Gossiping, Rallying, 2. Sophism, Pilpul, Critique, Pseudoscience, Supernaturalism, 3. Relativism, Straw-Manning, Misrepresentation, Cherry-Picking, Double-Standards, Half-Truth, False Equivalency, 4. False And Impossible Promise, Framing Moral Pretense, Baiting Into Hazard, Evasion From Warranty, Profiting From Resulting Hardship, 5. Nepotism, Privatization Of The Commons, Socialization Of Losses, Conspiracy, Organized-Crime, Rent-Seeking, Procedural-Abuse, False Accusation, Institutional Overloading, Intellectual Dishonesty, Coercion, 6. Endemic Lying, Shouting Down, Propagandizing, Poisoning The Discourse, Polluting The Informational Commons, Traitorousness, And Personal, Social, Political, Cultural, Religious, Aesthetic, Legal, Constitutional, And Institutional Undermining, 7. Thanklessness, Evading Introspection, Blame-Shifting, Avoidance Of Responsibility, And Cowering Under Plausible Deniability In Order To Avoid Any Semblance Of Truth, Reciprocity, Productivity, Duty, And Contribution To The Commons. 8. And scaling from the individual to the polity to the society to the civilization by Social Construction using: