Form: Excerpt

  • RT @curtdoolittle: 12) … while Europeans, in five hundred years in the ancient

    RT @curtdoolittle: 12) … while Europeans, in five hundred years in the ancient world, and five hundred years in the modern world, dragged…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 13:37:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270349229324677121

  • EUROPE, STATE FORMATION, AND GENETIC PACIFICATION Henry C. Harpending, Departmen

    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/147470491501300114WESTERN EUROPE, STATE FORMATION, AND GENETIC PACIFICATION

    Henry C. Harpending, Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/147470491501300114?

    (reminder via a friend)

    ABSTRACT

    Abstract: Through its monopoly on violence, the State tends to pacify social relations.Such pacification proceeded slowly in Western Europe between the 5th and 11th centuries, being hindered by the rudimentary nature of law enforcement, the belief in a man’s right to settle personal disputes as he saw fit, and the Church’s opposition to the death penalty.

    These hindrances began to dissolve in the 11th century with a consensus by Church and State that the wicked should be punished so that the good may live in peace. Courts imposed the death penalty more and more often and, by the late Middle Ages, were condemning to death between 0.5 and 1.0% of all men of each generation, with perhaps just as many offenders dying at the scene of the crime or in prison while awaiting trial. Meanwhile, the homicide rate plummeted from the 14th century to the 20th. The pool of violent men dried up until most murders occurred under conditions of jealousy,

    intoxication, or extreme stress. The decline in personal violence is usually attributed to harsher punishment and the longer-term effects of cultural conditioning. It may also be,

    however, that this new cultural environment selected against propensities for violence.Updated Jun 9, 2020, 10:21 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 10:21:00 UTC

  • CANCEL CULTURE JOURNALISM Two liberal editors fall for violations against progre

    CANCEL CULTURE JOURNALISM

    Two liberal editors fall for violations against progressive orthodoxy.

    By The Editorial Board

    June 8, 2020 7:19 pm ET

    The purge of senior editors at progressive newspapers this weekend is no cause for cheering. Their resignations are another milestone in the march of identity politics and cancel culture through our liberal institutions, and American journalism and democracy will be worse for it.

    The long-time editor of the Philadelphia Inquirer, who’d seen the publication through difficult times, was pushed out over a headline, “Buildings Matter, Too.” It was atop a piece by architecture critic Inga Saffron, who worried that buildings damaged by violence could “leave a gaping hole in the heart of Philadelphia.” Staff members deemed the headline an offense to Black Lives Matter. They protested, and no amount of apologizing or changes to the headline were enough. Editor Stan Wischnowski didn’t last the week.

    At the New York Times, editorial page editor James Bennet resigned Sunday after a staff uproar over an op-ed by a U.S. Senator. Arkansas Republican Tom Cotton wrote that military troops should be sent to restore public order in American cities when the police are overwhelmed. A staff revolt deemed the piece fascist, unconstitutional, and too offensive for adults to read and decide for themselves.

    Our editorial last week opposed deploying active-duty troops, but the idea is legal under the Insurrection Act. George H.W. Bush deployed troops in 1992 to quell riots in Los Angeles after the Rodney King verdict, and other Presidents have done it too.

    Mr. Bennet defended the op-ed on Friday as part of his attempt to broaden debate in his pages, and at first so did publisher A.G. Sulzberger. But Mr. Sulzberger changed his mind the same day, suddenly declaring that the op-ed he had defended had not received proper editing and should not have been published. By Sunday Mr. Bennet, as true-blue a progressive as you can find, was out the door. James Dao, the opinion editor who had signed off on the Cotton op-ed, was reassigned.

    An ostensibly independent opinion section was ransacked because the social-justice warriors in the newsroom opposed a single article espousing a view that polls show tens of millions of Americans support if the police can’t handle rioting and violence. The publisher failed to back up his editors, which means the editors no longer run the place. The struggle sessions on Twitter and Slack channels rule.

    All of this shows the extent to which American journalism is now dominated by the same moral denunciation, “safe space” demands, and identity-politics dogmas that began in the universities. The agents of this politics now dominate nearly all of America’s leading cultural institutions—museums, philanthropy, Hollywood, book publishers, even late-night talk shows.

    On matters deemed sacrosanct—and today that includes the view that America is root-and-branch racist—there is no room for debate. You must admit your failure to appreciate this orthodoxy and do penance, or you will not survive in the job.

    Some of our friends on the right are pleased because they say all of this merely exposes what has long been true. But this takeover of the Times and other liberal bastions means that there are ever fewer institutions that will defend free inquiry and the contest of ideas that once defined American liberalism.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 10:11:00 UTC

  • CRITIQUE OF DEMOCRACY By Tim Abbott —“Democracy leads to tyranny. Democracy is

    CRITIQUE OF DEMOCRACY

    By Tim Abbott

    —“Democracy leads to tyranny. Democracy is drunk with the concept of freedom. As result the rulers must flatter the citizens, must please the citizens. The teacher must entertain the desires of the citizens. What results from this is the demagogue. The supreme flatterer, captivates the imagination of the majority of the citizens. Eventually this person becomes a tyrant.”—From the Republic

    An oligarchy disenfranchises its own citizens. Democracy emerges from the oligarchy. The poor rise up in revolt and easily topple the oligarchs because the oligarchs were unwilling to invest in a good army. The democracy is established. It has four qualities, it affirms freedom, privacy, equality, and diversity.

    The democratic individual is the son of the oligarch, who is the father. The oligarch tells the son to be frugal. “All those things you say you want you really shouldn’t want. Don’t spend money. Devote yourself to the same pursuit I’ve devoted myself, mainly the pursuit of money.” The son knows the father is very wealthy. The father is unwilling to invest in education of his own son. His son is therefore undisciplined. His son is intoxicated in unnecessary desires. The desire for food when hungry, the unnecessary desire is courtesans, perfumes, art. The democratic son of the oligarch is wild at heart because he has been deprived of every pleasure even though his father could provide it because he is very wealthy. The son goes out to the city out on the streets and there he is exposed to chaos, desires and he becomes enthralled by all of them. This is the genesis of the democratic individual. Above all else the democratic individual is whimsical. We know why, he hasn’t been educated. The democratic individual above all else is hostile to all forms of authority.

    The paramount value of democracy is freedom. An authority of any form is a threat to freedom. A democracy is a youth culture, it is hostile to an elder, to authority. In a democracy, teachers start to fear their students. Students are so undisciplined so hostile to authority that they can sometimes threaten teachers. There are many schools in the United States where teachers are afraid of their students, where students have to walk through a metal detector. Parents in a democracy have a hard time discipling their children and if the children are obstinate enough the parent may simply give up and allow the children to do what they want. This all has to do with in a democracy freedom has such value.

    Our own democracy is a youth culture. The image of a young person is dominant in our media. Everyone wants to look young, thin, hate the idea of wrinkles, nothing is worse than looking old. Surgery, injection of drugs, all to prevent looking old. There is such a distaste for authority and tradition that there is no compelling reason to simply value the old only because they are old, in fact it is exactly the opposite.

    To harken back to the parable of the cave. It is emphasized that the parable of the cave has to do with our own education and implies a great deal of pain. The prisoner at the bottom of the cave is shackled and must be liberated. The prisoner has been sitting in darkness for a long period of time, the prisoner must get up and look at the sun. This will be painful to get up after sitting so long and it will also be painful to look at the light after being in darkness for so long. The pain reflects the difficulty of learning, the student has to challenge conventional wisdom in order to think for themselves. This is the exact hard discipline that is missing in a democracy.

    Democracy is excessively egalitarian. Isn’t that a self evident principle in our own society? If a person is wounded they should be treated, but if someone is chronically ill and has no hope of being restored to a healthy productive life they should simply be let go. Some human beings are more valuable than others, some human beings deserve medical treatment and others do not. A 90 year old man with Alzheimers is simply not equal to a 30 year old man who is healthy and strong. A doctor in our system, the objective is always the same, life and more life. There is no distinction between a life and a good life. All human beings are not equal, some are better than others.

    Democracy is formless, chaotic. There is no stable conception that regulates us all and gives us a sense of what is a good life. There is in short too much freedom. Young people should not be given the choice to maximum their options, they should be told what to do.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-07 17:20:00 UTC

  • RT @UnrollHelper: @bobby_dread Hello, you can read it here: @curtdoolittle: 1) T

    RT @UnrollHelper: @bobby_dread Hello, you can read it here: @curtdoolittle: 1) The reason for our civilizational conflict is that no one ei…

  • RT @UnrollHelper: @bobby_dread Hello, you can read it here: @curtdoolittle: 1) T

    RT @UnrollHelper: @bobby_dread Hello, you can read it here: @curtdoolittle: 1) The reason for our civilizational conflict is that no one ei…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-05 21:15:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269014973033918464

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump You don’t understand. We ar

    RT @curtdoolittle: @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump You don’t understand.
    We are against you.
    Trump is saving you from us.
    Because we’ve…

  • Why Leaders Lie: The Truth About Lying in International Politics – Book and Video Link

    WHY LEADERS LIE: THE TRUTH ABOUT LYING IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICS – BOOK AND VIDEO LINK by John J. Mearsheimer VIDEO AMAZON LINK In Why Leaders Lie, Mearsheimer provides the first systematic analysis of lying as a tool of statecraft, identifying the varieties, the reasons, and the potential costs and benefits. Drawing on a wealth of examples, he argues that leaders often lie for good strategic reasons, so a blanket condemnation is unrealistic and unwise. Yet there are other kinds of deception besides lying, including concealment and spinning. Perhaps no distinction is more important than that between lying to another state and lying to one’s own people. Mearsheimer was amazed to discover how unusual interstate lying has been; given the atmosphere of distrust among the great powers, he found that outright deceit is difficult to pull off and thus rarely worth the effort. Moreover, it sometimes backfires when it does occur. Khrushchev lied about the size of the Soviet missile force, sparking an American build-up. Eisenhower was caught lying about U-2 spy flights in 1960, which scuttled an upcoming summit with Krushchev. Leaders are more likely to mislead their own publics than other states, sometimes with damaging consequences. Though the reasons may be noble–Franklin Roosevelt, for example, lied to the American people about German U-boats attacking the destroyer USS Greer in 1940, to build a case for war against Hitler-they can easily lead to disaster, as with the Bush administration’s falsehoods about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. There has never been a sharp analysis of international lying. Now a leading expert provides a richly informed and powerfully argued work that will change our understanding of why leaders lie.

  • How Fear is used to control us

    Sep 28, 2019, 1:26 PM By Janet Godfrey “… let’s Recap: 1966: Oil Gone in Ten Years 1967: Dire Famine Forecast By 1975 1968: Overpopulation Will Spread Worldwide 1969: Everyone Will Disappear In a Cloud Of Blue Steam By 1989 1970: World Will Use Up All its Natural Resources by 2000 1970: Urban Citizens Will Require Gas Masks by 1985 1970: Nitrogen buildup Will Make All Land Unusable 1970: Decaying Pollution Will Kill all the Fish 1970s: Killer Bees! 1970: Ice Age By 2000 1970: America Subject to Water Rationing by 1974 and Food Rationing By 1980 1971: New Ice Age Coming By 2020 or 2030 1972: New Ice Age By 2070 1972: Oil Depleted in 20 Years 1974: Space Satellites Show New Ice Age Coming Fast 1974: Another Ice Age? 1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life 1976: Scientific Consensus Planet Cooling, Famines imminent 1977: Department of Energy Says Oil will Peak in 90s 1978: No End in Sight to 30-Year Cooling Trend 1980: Acid Rain Kills Life In Lakes 1980: Peak Oil In 2000 1988: Regional Droughts (that never happened) in 1990s 1988: Temperatures in DC Will Hit Record Highs 1988: Maldive Islands will Be Underwater by 2018 (they’re not) 1989: Rising Sea Levels will Obliterate Nations if Nothing Done by 2000 1989: New York City’s West Side Highway Underwater by 2019 (it’s not) 1996: Peak Oil in 2020 2000: Children Won’t Know what Snow Is 2002: Famine In 10 Years If We Don’t Give Up Eating Fish, Meat, and Dairy 2002: Peak Oil in 2010 2004: Britain will Be Siberia by 2024 2005: Manhattan Underwater by 2015 2006: Super Hurricanes! 2008: Arctic will Be Ice Free by 2018 2008: Climate Genius Al Gore Predicts Ice-Free Arctic by 2013 2009: Climate Genius Prince Charles Says we Have 96 Months to Save World 2009: UK Prime Minister Says 50 Days to ‘Save The Planet From Catastrophe’ 2009: Climate Genius Al Gore Moves 2013 Prediction of Ice-Free Arctic to 2014 2013: Arctic Ice-Free by 2015 2014: Only 500 Days Before ‘Climate Chaos 2019: Hey Greta, we need you to convince them it’s really going to happen this time” How Fear is used to control us Add this to yearly fears about which illness we will all be dying of and which country is a danger to us and you just have a climate of fear.”

  • How Fear is used to control us

    Sep 28, 2019, 1:26 PM By Janet Godfrey “… let’s Recap: 1966: Oil Gone in Ten Years 1967: Dire Famine Forecast By 1975 1968: Overpopulation Will Spread Worldwide 1969: Everyone Will Disappear In a Cloud Of Blue Steam By 1989 1970: World Will Use Up All its Natural Resources by 2000 1970: Urban Citizens Will Require Gas Masks by 1985 1970: Nitrogen buildup Will Make All Land Unusable 1970: Decaying Pollution Will Kill all the Fish 1970s: Killer Bees! 1970: Ice Age By 2000 1970: America Subject to Water Rationing by 1974 and Food Rationing By 1980 1971: New Ice Age Coming By 2020 or 2030 1972: New Ice Age By 2070 1972: Oil Depleted in 20 Years 1974: Space Satellites Show New Ice Age Coming Fast 1974: Another Ice Age? 1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life 1976: Scientific Consensus Planet Cooling, Famines imminent 1977: Department of Energy Says Oil will Peak in 90s 1978: No End in Sight to 30-Year Cooling Trend 1980: Acid Rain Kills Life In Lakes 1980: Peak Oil In 2000 1988: Regional Droughts (that never happened) in 1990s 1988: Temperatures in DC Will Hit Record Highs 1988: Maldive Islands will Be Underwater by 2018 (they’re not) 1989: Rising Sea Levels will Obliterate Nations if Nothing Done by 2000 1989: New York City’s West Side Highway Underwater by 2019 (it’s not) 1996: Peak Oil in 2020 2000: Children Won’t Know what Snow Is 2002: Famine In 10 Years If We Don’t Give Up Eating Fish, Meat, and Dairy 2002: Peak Oil in 2010 2004: Britain will Be Siberia by 2024 2005: Manhattan Underwater by 2015 2006: Super Hurricanes! 2008: Arctic will Be Ice Free by 2018 2008: Climate Genius Al Gore Predicts Ice-Free Arctic by 2013 2009: Climate Genius Prince Charles Says we Have 96 Months to Save World 2009: UK Prime Minister Says 50 Days to ‘Save The Planet From Catastrophe’ 2009: Climate Genius Al Gore Moves 2013 Prediction of Ice-Free Arctic to 2014 2013: Arctic Ice-Free by 2015 2014: Only 500 Days Before ‘Climate Chaos 2019: Hey Greta, we need you to convince them it’s really going to happen this time” How Fear is used to control us Add this to yearly fears about which illness we will all be dying of and which country is a danger to us and you just have a climate of fear.”