Form: Excerpt

  • Seven Biological Systems Associated with Intelligence

    THE OBVIOUS IS INCREASINGLY CONFIRMED BY THE SCIENCE. —“Seven novel biological systems associated with intelligence differences were found. 1 Neurogenesis, the process by which neurons are generated from neural stem cells. 2 Genes expressed in the synapse, consistent with previous studies showing a role for synaptic plasticity. 3 Regulation of nervous system development. 4 Neuron projection 5 Neuron differentiation 6 Central nervous system neuron differentiation. 7 Oligodendrocyte differentiation. “—

  • Igor Markov’s answer: Russia wants the US to give it free reign in what Russia c

    Igor Markov’s answer: Russia wants the US to give it free reign in what Russia considers its sphere of influence — ex-USSR countries, plus Serbia, plus Syria, plus Libya, Cuba, Venezuela, etc. Russia also wants to expand its influence in Europe, suppress competition in several energy markets (nat….
  • Mar 19, 2018, 9:49 AM

    https://www.quora.com/What-do-Russia-and-the-U-S-want-from-each-other/answer/Igor-Markov?share=a5e9f85e&srid=u4QvUpdated Mar 19, 2018, 9:49 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 09:49:00 UTC

  • Igor Markov’s answer: Russia wants the US to give it free reign in what Russia c

    Igor Markov’s answer: Russia wants the US to give it free reign in what Russia considers its sphere of influence — ex-USSR countries, plus Serbia, plus Syria, plus Libya, Cuba, Venezuela, etc. Russia also wants to expand its influence in Europe, suppress competition in several energy markets (nat….
  • Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evide

    Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evidence to me that your philosophy and Peterson’s dovetail beautifully, I wish that you two could exchange ideas. Interviewer: “I mentioned earlier that this country follows a lot of the US trends, good and bad, we are a little bit behind”. Peterson: “Like Canada” Interviewer: “What do we need to be alert to? What do we need to be aware of? What do we need to avoid?” Peterson: “We need to… we need to be alert to the benefits of the societies that we now inhabit. We need to be grateful for their existence and know very carefully the unlikelihood of their continued success. Now, I don’t understand how we managed it. In the West we have societies where the default assumption between human beings is trust. I do not understand how we managed that… because there’s so many ways that you can be betrayed by someone especially if you don’t know them. How do you set up a society where the typical interaction between strangers is straight? How many societies in the world are like that? Like, 30? 40? Something like that. How did that ever happen? We don’t know and it’s an ongoing miracle and we should do everything we can not to disrupt it because the alternative to that generous trust, that courageous trust, which is unbelievably productive, is rule by thug, and that’s the rule of most of the world.” Interviewer: “So do you have optimism or not for the future?” Peterson: “I think that we’re in a time of extreme chaos. Things could go unbelievably well if we’re careful. There’s so many good things going on in the world right now” … “God only knows what we could accomplish if we got our act together in the next twenty years. The sky is the limit. So… BUT we’re playing very foolish games in the West, and we could bring the house down around us. So, we’ll see.” https://youtu.be/hcDKNNvUR4I?t=13m39s Eric Danelaw
  • Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evide

    Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evidence to me that your philosophy and Peterson’s dovetail beautifully, I wish that you two could exchange ideas.

    Interviewer: “I mentioned earlier that this country follows a lot of the US trends, good and bad, we are a little bit behind”.

    Peterson: “Like Canada”

    Interviewer: “What do we need to be alert to? What do we need to be aware of? What do we need to avoid?”

    Peterson: “We need to… we need to be alert to the benefits of the societies that we now inhabit. We need to be grateful for their existence and know very carefully the unlikelihood of their continued success. Now, I don’t understand how we managed it. In the West we have societies where the default assumption between human beings is trust. I do not understand how we managed that… because there’s so many ways that you can be betrayed by someone especially if you don’t know them. How do you set up a society where the typical interaction between strangers is straight? How many societies in the world are like that? Like, 30? 40? Something like that. How did that ever happen? We don’t know and it’s an ongoing miracle and we should do everything we can not to disrupt it because the alternative to that generous trust, that courageous trust, which is unbelievably productive, is rule by thug, and that’s the rule of most of the world.”

    Interviewer: “So do you have optimism or not for the future?”

    Peterson: “I think that we’re in a time of extreme chaos. Things could go unbelievably well if we’re careful. There’s so many good things going on in the world right now” … “God only knows what we could accomplish if we got our act together in the next twenty years. The sky is the limit. So… BUT we’re playing very foolish games in the West, and we could bring the house down around us. So, we’ll see.”

    https://youtu.be/hcDKNNvUR4I?t=13m39s

    Eric Danelaw


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 10:26:00 UTC

  • Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evide

    Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evidence to me that your philosophy and Peterson’s dovetail beautifully, I wish that you two could exchange ideas. Interviewer: “I mentioned earlier that this country follows a lot of the US trends, good and bad, we are a little bit behind”. Peterson: “Like Canada” Interviewer: “What do we need to be alert to? What do we need to be aware of? What do we need to avoid?” Peterson: “We need to… we need to be alert to the benefits of the societies that we now inhabit. We need to be grateful for their existence and know very carefully the unlikelihood of their continued success. Now, I don’t understand how we managed it. In the West we have societies where the default assumption between human beings is trust. I do not understand how we managed that… because there’s so many ways that you can be betrayed by someone especially if you don’t know them. How do you set up a society where the typical interaction between strangers is straight? How many societies in the world are like that? Like, 30? 40? Something like that. How did that ever happen? We don’t know and it’s an ongoing miracle and we should do everything we can not to disrupt it because the alternative to that generous trust, that courageous trust, which is unbelievably productive, is rule by thug, and that’s the rule of most of the world.” Interviewer: “So do you have optimism or not for the future?” Peterson: “I think that we’re in a time of extreme chaos. Things could go unbelievably well if we’re careful. There’s so many good things going on in the world right now” … “God only knows what we could accomplish if we got our act together in the next twenty years. The sky is the limit. So… BUT we’re playing very foolish games in the West, and we could bring the house down around us. So, we’ll see.” https://youtu.be/hcDKNNvUR4I?t=13m39s Eric Danelaw
  • Curt Doolittle’s answer: A very different take – but I won’t express it until th

    Curt Doolittle’s answer: A very different take – but I won’t express it until the end: My generation was taught to sketch, then pseudocode (to quickly write in comments), then to write the code. To make it work, make it work, make it rock solid and elegant. This evolutionary cycle allows you to…
  • Curt Doolittle’s answer: A very different take – but I won’t express it until th

    Curt Doolittle’s answer: A very different take – but I won’t express it until the end: My generation was taught to sketch, then pseudocode (to quickly write in comments), then to write the code. To make it work, make it work, make it rock solid and elegant. This evolutionary cycle allows you to…
  • Peterson And Doolittle

    by William Benge Peterson energizes the incentives for positiva in the personal and interpersonal realm, whereas Doolittle is working to lay out the more costly and precision-bound negativa as instrument for reversing present mischief and preventing any future aberrations. Of course, there is overlap. POSITIVA FOR SELF We cannot imagine Peterson’s positiva holding capacity to level and decimate the world’s greatest culprits, the fed and CIA. Nonetheless, Peterson does inculcate condemnation and rejection of the false premises the Fed and CIA (commies) operate upon, while at the same time exciting both reason and action toward sensible positiva in the personal sphere. RECIPROCITY/SUPPRESSION NEGATIVA Whereas, Doolittle’s negativa can be employed to destroy the 1) position of every actor within these nefarious institutions (also proceed to invalidate the institutions themselves) AND the 2) position of any sympathetic supporters (commies) underneath or aside those institutions. COLLECTIVISM AS NATIONALISM Peterson and Doolittle are partnered in destroying this forever.