Curt Doolittle

Form: Excerpt

  • DISAMBIGUATING SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, AND PSEUDOSCIENCE (excerpt from the introduc

    DISAMBIGUATING SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, AND PSEUDOSCIENCE
    (excerpt from the introduction)

    —I used the aristotelian categories from the discipline of philosophy partly to compete with, and correct the traditional discipline of philosophy, by completing the demarcation between truth (science), philosophy (choice), and the sophism and pseudoscience (error, fraud, deceit) – particularly in metaphysics – that occupies the vast majority of what passes for philosophical prose.—

    😉

    https://propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:14:46 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426298672610158

  • by Martin Ĺ těpĂĄn The universe is governed by physical laws that govern interacti

    by Martin Štěpán

    The universe is governed by physical laws that govern interactions of articles. Provided quantum mechanics really is nonsense, or at least, within limits or particle formation, they are deterministic.

    An emergent property of these interactions is life (nature). Life is a process of replication and everything that derives from it (variation, competition, positive and negative selection, adaptation, hierarchies, symbiosis, supply, demand…). Interactions of replicators are governed by natural laws that are probabilistic, expressed in bell curves and pareto distributions, described by game theory.

    In this view, what Curt discovered is a specific natural law, the natural law of reciprocity which describes what criteria does an interaction have to fulfill in order to be reciprocal (symbiotic) not just between the parties involved but the entire group (no negative externality).

    The reason such interactions are preferable is due to the outsized benefits of cooperation that make us into a fitter group, better able to compete with other groups. The rule of law of reciprocity then enforces reciprocal interactions by increasing the cost of every alternative.

    Does this make sense?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:12:55 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426291390109091

  • (…) Abstract The origins of Ashkenazi Jews remain highly controversial. Like J

    (…)
    Abstract
    The origins of Ashkenazi Jews remain highly controversial. Like Judaism, mitochondrial DNA is passed along the maternal line. Its variation in the Ashkenazim is highly distinctive, with four major and numerous minor founders. However, due to their rarity in the general population, these founders have been difficult to trace to a source. Here we show that all four major founders, ~40% of Ashkenazi mtDNA variation, have ancestry in prehistoric Europe, rather than the Near East or Caucasus. Furthermore, most of the remaining minor founders share a similar deep European ancestry. Thus the great majority of Ashkenazi maternal lineages were not brought from the Levant, as commonly supposed, nor recruited in the Caucasus, as sometimes suggested, but assimilated within Europe. These results point to a significant role for the conversion of women in the formation of Ashkenazi communities, and provide the foundation for a detailed reconstruction of Ashkenazi genealogical history.
    (…)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:06:12 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426264988527585

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426260226428141

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    (…) DISTINCT POPULATIONS https://www.sciencedaily.com/rel…/2013/10/131008112539.htm Journal Reference: Marta D. Costa, Joana B. Pereira, Maria Pala, VerĂłnica Fernandes, Anna Olivieri, Alessandro Achilli, Ugo A. Perego, Sergei Rychkov, Oksana Naumova, Jiři Hatina, Scott R. Woodward, Ken Khong Eng, Vincent Macaulay, Martin Carr, Pedro Soares, LuĂ­sa Pereira, Martin B. Richards. A substantial prehistoric European ancestry amongst Ashkenazi maternal lineages. Nature Communications, 2013; 4 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3543 https://www.cell.com/ajhg/fulltext/S0002-9297(10)00246-6 Abraham’s Children in the Genome Era: Major Jewish Diaspora Populations Comprise Distinct Genetic Clusters with Shared Middle Eastern Ancestry Gil Atzmon Li Hao,Itsik Pe’er Christopher Velez, Alexander Pearlman, Pier Francesco, Palamara, Bernice Morrow, Eitan Friedman, Carole Oddoux Edward Burns, Harry Ostrer 2010DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.015 MOST EUROPEAN WOMEN TAKEN BY JEWISH MEN WERE ITALIAN Substantial prehistoric European ancestry amongst Ashkenazi maternal lineages Marta D. Costa, Joana B. Pereira, Maria Pala, VerĂłnica Fernandes, Anna Olivieri, Alessandro Achilli, Ugo A. Perego, Sergei Rychkov, Oksana Naumova, Jiři Hatina, Scott R. Woodward, Ken Khong Eng, Vincent Macaulay, Martin Carr, Pedro Soares, LuĂ­sa Pereira & Martin B. Richards Nature Communications volume 4, Article number: 2543 (2013) | Download Citation (…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426260226428141

  • (…) DISTINCT POPULATIONS Journal Reference: Marta D. Costa, Joana B. Pereira,

    (…)
    DISTINCT POPULATIONS
    sciencedaily.com/rel…/2013/10/131008112539.
    Journal Reference: Marta D. Costa, Joana B. Pereira, Maria Pala, Verónica Fernandes, Anna Olivieri, Alessandro Achilli, Ugo A. Perego, Sergei Rychkov, Oksana Naumova, Jiři Hatina, Scott R. Woodward, Ken Khong Eng, Vincent Macaulay, Martin Carr, Pedro Soares, Luísa Pereira, Martin B. Richards. A substantial prehistoric European ancestry amongst Ashkenazi maternal lineages. Nature Communications, 2013; 4 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3543
    cell.com/ajhg/fulltext/S0002-9297(10)00246-6
    Abraham’s Children in the Genome Era: Major Jewish Diaspora Populations Comprise Distinct Genetic Clusters with Shared Middle Eastern Ancestry
    Gil Atzmon Li Hao,Itsik Pe’er
    Christopher Velez, Alexander Pearlman, Pier Francesco, Palamara, Bernice Morrow, Eitan Friedman, Carole Oddoux
    Edward Burns, Harry Ostrer
    2010DOI:doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.015

    MOST EUROPEAN WOMEN TAKEN BY JEWISH MEN WERE ITALIAN
    Substantial prehistoric European ancestry amongst Ashkenazi maternal lineages
    Marta D. Costa, Joana B. Pereira, Maria Pala, Verónica Fernandes, Anna Olivieri, Alessandro Achilli, Ugo A. Perego, Sergei Rychkov, Oksana Naumova, Jiři Hatina, Scott R. Woodward, Ken Khong Eng, Vincent Macaulay, Martin Carr, Pedro Soares, Luísa Pereira & Martin B. Richards
    Nature Communications volume 4, Article number: 2543 (2013) | Download Citation
    (…)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:05:00 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426260226428141

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426254044398253

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    (…) Here we use high-density bead arrays to genotype individuals from 14 Jewish Diaspora communities and compare these patterns of genome-wide diversity with those from 69 Old World non-Jewish populations, of which 25 have not previously been reported. These samples were carefully chosen to provide comprehensive comparisons between Jewish and non-Jewish populations in the Diaspora, as well as with non-Jewish populations from the Middle East and north Africa. Principal component and structure-like analyses identify previously unrecognized genetic substructure within the Middle East. Most Jewish samples form a remarkably tight subcluster that overlies Druze and Cypriot samples but not samples from other Levantine populations or paired Diaspora host populations. In contrast, Ethiopian Jews (Beta Israel) and Indian Jews (Bene Israel and Cochini) cluster with neighbouring autochthonous populations in Ethiopia and western India, respectively, despite a clear paternal link between the Bene Israel and the Levant. These results cast light on the variegated genetic architecture of the Middle East, and trace the origins of most Jewish Diaspora communities to the Levant. (…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426254044398253

  • (…) Here we use high-density bead arrays to genotype individuals from 14 Jewis

    (…)
    Here we use high-density bead arrays to genotype individuals from 14 Jewish Diaspora communities and compare these patterns of genome-wide diversity with those from 69 Old World non-Jewish populations, of which 25 have not previously been reported. These samples were carefully chosen to provide comprehensive comparisons between Jewish and non-Jewish populations in the Diaspora, as well as with non-Jewish populations from the Middle East and north Africa. Principal component and structure-like analyses identify previously unrecognized genetic substructure within the Middle East. Most Jewish samples form a remarkably tight subcluster that overlies Druze and Cypriot samples but not samples from other Levantine populations or paired Diaspora host populations. In contrast, Ethiopian Jews (Beta Israel) and Indian Jews (Bene Israel and Cochini) cluster with neighbouring autochthonous populations in Ethiopia and western India, respectively, despite a clear paternal link between the Bene Israel and the Levant. These results cast light on the variegated genetic architecture of the Middle East, and trace the origins of most Jewish Diaspora communities to the Levant.
    (…)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:03:25 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426254044398253

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426249136889546

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    NO THEY’RE NOT EUROPEAN. WTF IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE? LUNATIC FRINGE…. 1. “Middle eastern populations began as the ‘marsh arabs’” 2. “Jewish origins are are indistinguishable from palestinians. ” 3. “Most (converts) women were of Italian origins (during the roman empire)” 4. “Jewish men located, married local women, and began immediately inbreeding.” 5. “Jews have been a distinct ethnic group in europe for over one thousand years” 6. “The Male Y is 50-80% levantine (even today).” ORIGINS IN ME, AND SPLIT BETWEEN LEVANTINE AND MESOPOTAMIAN(BABYLONIAN-IRANIAN) The genome-wide structure of the Jewish people Doron M. Behar, Bayazit Yunusbayev, Mait Metspalu, Ene Metspalu, Saharon Rosset, JĂźri Parik, Siiri Rootsi, Gyaneshwer Chaubey, Ildus Kutuev, Guennady Yudkovsky, Elza K. Khusnutdinova, Oleg Balanovsky, Ornella Semino, Luisa Pereira, David Comas, David Gurwitz, Batsheva Bonne-Tamir, Tudor Parfitt, Michael F. Hammer, Karl Skorecki & Richard Villems Nature volume 466, pages 238–242 (08 July 2010) | Contemporary Jews comprise an aggregate of ethno-religious communities whose worldwide members identify with each other through various shared religious, historical and cultural traditions1,2. Historical evidence suggests common origins in the Middle East, followed by migrations leading to the establishment of communities of Jews in Europe, Africa and Asia, in what is termed the Jewish Diaspora3,4,5. This complex demographic history imposes special challenges in attempting to address the genetic structure of the Jewish people6. Although many genetic studies have shed light on Jewish origins and on diseases prevalent among Jewish communities, including studies focusing on uniparentally and biparentally inherited markers7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16, genome-wide patterns of variation across the vast geographic span of Jewish Diaspora communities and their respective neighbours have yet to be addressed. (…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426249136889546

  • More by Igor Rogov — One of the major (theoretical) dividing lines between Fas

    — More by Igor Rogov —

    One of the major (theoretical) dividing lines between Fascism of and National Socialism is that Fascist doctrine openly proclaimed that democratic majority (which at the time meant proletariat+peasantry) could not rule the human society. Instead, aristocratic, progressive, intellectual minority of the best people nation could produce has an obligation to rule benevolently, listening to the concerns of the masses and negating all the ills that gave rise to Social-democratic doctrines, Marxism and alike.

    Not quite so with National Socialists, who engaged in lengthy party building process and came to power as a result of democratic elections, mobilizing and expressing the popular opinions of majority, not the daring march on Rome of some upstarts. For National Socialists it is vital to channel the will of the national masses, – not via slow and inefficient democratic institutions, but by the leader, who is “man of the people” and perfectly accessible. As such, he gives an example to his party comrades, who are also required to be friends of the people.

    This distinction was apparent not only in theoretical constructs, but in practical arrangements in Italy, – fascists were closely engaged with an old European aristocracy, while German National socialists were assembling in Beer Gardens among the simplest folks and preferred to promote the loyal upstarts from the lower classes. The division between Mussolini and Hitler is also clear – first positioned himself as an intellectual and expressed his scorn about simple-mindedness of Hitler’s writings and the low culture of Nazi party and Germany itself, while Mussolini and the Fascists were later seen as too conservative by the National Socialists and too attached to superficial theatricality instead of radical social reforms.

    (CD: yep)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:28:48 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424702347752616

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424701403641068

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    —” CAN YOU DEFINE THE DIFFERENCES IN NATIONAL SOCIALISM AND FASCISM?”— Let’s put fascism in series so that we can disambiguate it. Market Meritocracy: the anglo and dutch method of civil organization (made possible by extensive trade in the absence of a strong state, and presence of talented economic classes, and endless opportunity for all.) Communism: state seizure of the means of production by the underclasses and equidistribution of production by ‘need’. (Jewish – Envious, destructive ) National Socialism: state intervention in internal production, and direction of returns to the commons for kin: via positiva care. (french – pragmatic) Fascism: Defense of the commons from non-kin – via-negativa defense. (Italian – ideological ) Combination of both national socialism and fascism (Germany – Secular Theological ) Technological advancement had made possible the direction of new wealth from the industrial revolution to the advancement of groups. The debate was over: … empires (successfully transformed nations (britain, america) -vs- … the old backward nations (continental europe) -vs- ….classes (the failed nations (jewish – universalist)). Which we can see as not terribly complicated in retrospect: the rational choice of peoples to respond to change in material circumstances dependent upon their extant condition. Fascism consists in the pursuit of Autarky (economic and resource independence) under a corporation called the state, which represents an extended tribe of people (nation) by direct intervention with industry and trade to give preference to autarkic exchanges and prevention of externalization of gains of resources and production despite pricing signals that would normally instruct members of any given industry to operate efficiently by buying by price alone. Fascism provides a merger of the state and industry such that industry adopts autarkic pricing, buying within the country, rather than market pricing. National Socialism was a response to Market Meritocracy, where the same opportunities were not available to all, in an historically authoritarian state with vast bureaucratic organs both secular and theological. Fascism was and is EXPLICITLY racial national tribal because it arose in RESPONSE to communism. Germany was exceptionally talented in all aspects but needed to defend herself, and direct new wealth to the expansion of commons. Communism(Socialism) was a response to both given the backwardness of the classes and states, and gave jews, ‘intellectuals’ and underclasses a means of using the bottom to gain power against the middle which they envied. in particular communism was a means by which jewish minority could replace the nobility, seize power in the russian empire, which was the most backward, with the largest poor population, and was in turmoil because of the war, and the need to use ‘bodies’ in that war to compensate for the backwardness of industry and state.

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424701403641068

  • The Comparison of Mean IQ in Muslim and Non-Muslim Countries By Templer, Donald

    —-
    The Comparison of Mean IQ in Muslim and Non-Muslim Countries
    By Templer, Donald I.

    Article excerpt
    The present research found that the Muslim country mean IQ of 81 is half a standard deviation below the mean IQ of non-Muslim nations and is not related to strength of Muslim culture as defined by the percentage of Muslims in the country. The mean IQ of 84 in Arab countries is not associated with per capita income and is incompatible with the intellectual achievements of the golden age of the Muslim Empire. Possible explanations for this decline include hybridization with sub-Saharan Africans, dysgenic decrease in the more educated Muslims employing birth control as suggested by Meisenberg, the Muslim religion not fostering critical thinking, and the intellectual contributions being both exaggerated and made by non-Muslims.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:14:32 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424646238108519

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424644836269721

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    —“My point was that it’s a lie that these countries were all racially contaminated by Muslims. Iran, which should have experienced the greatest amount, was minimally effected. The only traces of Arab DNA are near Arab borders. NOTHING HAS CHANGED”— Arman Ghaffari I use the word ‘dysgenia’, and the cause of dysgenia Islam, and islam as an excuse for the Arab expansion. See the charts attached (there are many open to google) that show that yes, arab genetic transfer is limited. So what I think you interpret as arab genes is arab and islamic influence and the ‘reversal of the aristocratic program to develop a middle class’, from which to profit upon the production and trade of, and to use as a professional bureaucracy as the west did with church members, and the east did with confucian school members. Everywhere islam goes people who adopt it ‘get dumber’, remain separate, do not integrate, remain poor, and fall behind, until they overwhelm the ‘competent’ majority with their dead weight burden. Why Dysgenia? 1. Destruction of knowledge and accumulated capital of more developed civilizations. 2. Destruction of aristocracy, culture, and meritocracy. 3. Differing rates of reproduction of the classes 4. Cultural Ambitions of the classes. (islam=ignorance) 5. Slave trade, origins of the slave stock, and slave inbreeding. 6. Inbreeding (cousin marriage) in a low trust society where limited property must be kept in the clan. Muslims never developed manorialism. Never developed commons. Never developed professional bureaucracy Adopted authoritarian mysticism and functional illiteracy. The achievements were Persian use of greco roman thought, not arab or muslim. In other words, the arab expansion destroyed the accumulated genetic and cultural capital of every civilization it touched, and gave license to dysgenic reproduction to the underclasses. yes, Arab genes are afro-asiatic in distribution, but the affect of the Arab expansion of islam destroyed genetic and cultural and knowledge capital that inhibited the growth of those countries just as christianity idd in the west, and judaism and islam are seeking to do today. In other words most dygenia is the result of asymmetric reproduction of the classes such that the underclass are not suppressed as they were in wet and far east, nor the aristocracy expanded as it was in the great civilizations of the ancient world.

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424644836269721

  • (from elsewhere by “Thomas”) NOW IS A TIME *FOR* MONSTERS In 1929, the Italian A

    (from elsewhere by “Thomas”)

    NOW IS A TIME *FOR* MONSTERS

    In 1929, the Italian Antonio Gramsci was in a fascist prison, writing about what he considered to be a new interregnum – a Europe that was tearing itself apart. He anticipated civil unrest, war between nations and repeated changes in the lines of geographic possession.

    At that time, he was attributed as saying,

    —“The old world is dying and the new world struggles to be born. Now is the time of monsters.”—

    The world war that followed brought forward the worst traits in mankind. The sociopaths of the world came centre-stage. By the time the dust had settled, tens of millions were dead.

    And so, now is the time of monsters, as Mr. Gramsci rightly stated. A time of uncertainty, when countries are in turmoil and would-be leaders are jostling for power with existing leaders.

    In the US we see, on the liberal side, promises for “free health care for all,” a guaranteed basic income, housing for those who cannot afford it, and an endless stream of promises that, if the government were to implement them all, they will not be able to pay for them, even with 100% taxation from those who presently pay tax.

    On the conservative side, we see promises such as “Make America Great Again,” with tax rebates that do not rejuvenate the economy, breaks for firms that have expatriated, but do not fool them into returning, claims to cut budgets, only to increase them, and promises to eliminate debt, only to expand it.

    We see presidential elections in which one of the two leading candidates is a textbook narcissist, whilst the other displays all the traits of sociopathy.

    And we see a waitress elected to Congress by a substantial margin, raised to the status of heroine merely for promising all things to all people, whilst offering no plan as to how that might come about. Record numbers of candidates pour into the political arena, seeking a last grab at power prior to systemic failure.

    To be fair, the US is by no means alone in delivering incapable people with nonsensical solutions to the higher offices.

    In the UK, each leading party states emphatically that a hard Brexit would be a disaster, yet neither party can come up with a working alternative. What they can do, as in America, is point fingers and shout invectives at each other.

    In France, riots have become a weekend staple, whilst the disconnected president essentially says, “Let them eat cake,” serving only to create further fury on the street.

    Historically, a period such as this one is followed by one of increased madness. Historically, the next step is societal breakdown. Riots, secessions and revolutions become commonplace, accompanied by economic collapse.

    —

    Look in the mirror. Smile. Say it: “MY NAME IS MONSTER”

    Hoist the jolly roger.

    It’s time for skull pyramids.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:03:00 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424600819675536

  • EXERPT FROM GUILLAUME FAY’S ETHNIC APOCALYPSE (Arkatos 2019) The whole book foll

    EXERPT FROM GUILLAUME FAY’S ETHNIC APOCALYPSE (Arkatos 2019)

    The whole book follows this ‘tone’….

    It is anti-Abrahamic (christian, jewish, islamist) all the way thru, and no mercy is shown to any….

    ——–

    Weakness, Cowardice, Denial and Gullibility —
    The Four Pillars of Our Disappearance

    In December 2016, the Berlin Christmas market — a
    strong Christian symbol in its own right — was targeted
    by a jihadist who, similarly to what we witnessed in Nice
    in July 2014, used a truck to ram into people. The death
    toll totalled twelve indels oered to allah-the-most-
    merciful as a sacrice. In his anti-racist desire to avoid
    potential ‘amalgamations’ and the ‘stigmatisation’ of
    Muslims, a certain Green MP (an Islamophilic leftist,
    which constitutes an almost pleonasmic combination of
    words) refused to allow the assassin’s wanted notice to
    be published. One is thus plunged into the very depths of
    collaboration and complicity with those criminal
    invaders.

    Angela Merkel, who, as part of a theatrical and fake
    sort of humanitarianism, has organised the Syrian
    migrant invasion, is also objectively co-responsible for
    the situation. Although the migrants are mostly
    Muslims, their exclusively Syrian origin has yet to be
    proven.

    As for Ivan Rioufol, he believes that, through its elites,
    Europe is digging its own grave. Here is what he wrote in
    Le Figaro: ‘German society is devastated by its own self-
    blame. Thus do emasculated civilisations perish’. The
    greatest fear of Western European leaders, of those…

    (Etc…)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:01:06 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424593455170557

  • THE CONDITIONS FOR A POSSIBLE VICTORY from Guillaume Faye’s Ethnic Apocalypse. E

    THE CONDITIONS FOR A POSSIBLE VICTORY
    from Guillaume Faye’s Ethnic Apocalypse.

    Everything will depend on the shock caused by ethnic
    uprising and on the destruction and disorganisation that
    it will generate. If the shock is strong and traumatic
    enough and can reverse mentalities, a victory is possible;
    but obviously only at the price of a choice between the
    logic of war and the dogmatism of human rights, which
    are completely incompatible with one another. The
    essential criterion for a mental change on the part of the
    French people, be it our authorities or ordinary citizens,
    would be their readiness to shed blood. As for our police
    forces, they would have to acknowledge the fact that it is no longer a question of ‘policing’, as was the case in May
    1968, but of a civil war, which is not quite the same
    thing.

    To paraphrase Clausewitz, I would say that ‘what
    characterises war is one’s acceptance to receive death
    but also give it, without being confused with a murderer’.
    Who knows if, following our potential victory in this
    racial civil war, any and all immigrational invasions will
    not be rendered impossible (and even unthinkable in the
    eyes of those who would launch them), with de-
    migration a self-evident fact one shamelessly and
    assertively demands? For nowhere is the future written.
    There are many who lament, saying that ‘the damage is
    done, it is too late’. When one considers the horrid
    migrational invasion; the (mostly African) demographic
    explosion, which has gone hand in hand with rampant
    Islamisation; the emasculation of our ageing French
    population; the brain drain of our young people (as the
    ‘bac -6’ replaces the ‘bac +6’);sre and the hateful
    aggressiveness of millions of non-integrable and
    unassimilable immigrants, there is indeed a great deal
    for us to deal with and to make us dizzy.

    Pessimists predict that we are destined to vanish off
    the face of history, in favour of an inferior civilisation.
    And it is precisely in order to prove these predictions
    wrong that we must enter the arena and give battle.

    THE DE-MIGRATION OF THE AFTERWAR

    As it unleashes its fury and grows, the coming racial
    civil war shall, through its unique violence, turn into an
    unprecedented collective trauma whose memory will
    echo across the centuries. By means of its uncontrolled
    and uncontrollable aspects, this wave of violence shall
    make possible many human reactions and solutions
    which, today, seem unimaginable.

    Moreover, the question is not whether de-migration,
    i.e. the massive repatriation of African and oriental
    populations to their countries of origin, is possible or
    not. It must be made possible, and must take place
    and commence very soon, because it is both
    necessary and vital.

    It is humanly, politically and historically necessary for
    us, the white men and women of Europe, to have these
    people return home. Let me state things clearly: whether
    willingly or by force, they shall indeed leave. This is not
    only my promise, but also my prognosis.

    (…)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:00:33 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424591209781876