Openness: It’s just a trait measure of intelligence, and intelligence is just a measure of rates of neural adaptation to stimulation (fluidic) and the consequences of exposure to training data (crystalline).
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-07 20:35:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457446688684130306
Reply addressees: @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457305677597233152
BTC Properties: Deposit note (Debt), Share of Stock(Exchange), Token Money (Network Liquidity).
Not sure why that’s hard to understand. https://t.co/YtTOOzf6ke
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-07 03:05:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457182310063919110
9) Abrahamism:
Consists of undermining truth reason probability and evidence by use of False Promise, Baiting into Hazard, Pilpul (positive), Critique (negative), straw-manning, and heaping of
undue praise, and propagation into social construction, to use suggestion and overloading to force individuals, groups, and polities, to appeal to your intuition rather than reason and evidence. it’s the same technique used by faith healers, priests, and con artists. And the higher a group’s trust the more susceptible they are to it.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-07 02:27:53 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107233415874967945
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107233409170355771
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
TERMS: Grammar, Logic, Justification, Sophistry, Pilpul, Critique, Abrahamism 1) Grammar: (a) rules of “continuous recursive disambiguation” creating a contract for meaning, and consisting of: A Paradigm, consisting of: First Principles, Logic, Vocabulary, Syntax. (b) Grammars can be DeflationaryInflationary, where deflationary consists of math, logic, accounting, procedures, etc, and inflationary consist of stories, fictions, fictionalisms, deceits, and denials etc. (c) Operational grammar: operational grammar consists of complete sentences in promissory form, consisting of a sequence of subjectively testable operations producing complete transactions of changes in state. ie: ‘unambiguous measurements’. 2) Logic: the test of constant relations between properties reducible to analogy to experience, internally as identity, externally between premises and statements, or externally between statements. (a) all statements must consist of continuously recursive disambiguation (b) there is no closure other than tautology, (c) all non-tautological tests are falsificationary. (d) falsification requires tests: internal, external, operational, rational, reciprocal, completeness. 3) Truth: (a)Truth consists of a claim of innocence, by testimony sufficient for the satisfaction of demand for infallibility in the context. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/04/24/truth-testimony-that-satisfies-demand-for-infallibility/ (b) Hierarchy of Decidability: Statements are undecidable, possibly true, or certainly false. All logic is Ternary. (c) A proof provides a test of possibility: a justification. Truth must survive falsification. 4) Justification: either (a) a moral explanation for a claim of innocence (b) a false pretense that a proof is other than a possibility (c) and an evasion of the cost of falsification. (d) a fraud constructed by the pretense of due diligency by paying the cost of falsification. 5) Sophistry: (a) General: any use of loading, framing, suggestion, obscuring, conflating, inflating, fictionalism, or denial, to claim consistency in identity, internality, externality, operationality, rationality, reciprocity, or completeness that does not exist. (b) More specifically, the use of the three means of fictionalism: Physical: Magic to Pseudoscience, Verbal: Sophistry to idealism (philosophy), Imaginary: Occult to Supernaturalism (theology), to convey a pretense of causality or knowledge that cannot be testified to. 7) Pilpul: (attached) “The Positive Sell” Sophistry that implies a false promise of freedom from formal, physical, natural, or evolutionary laws by use of the following methods: (first image) 8) Critique: (attached) “The Negative Sell” (second and third images) (9) MORE IN COMMENTS….
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107233409170355771
TERMS: Grammar, Logic, Justification, Sophistry, Pilpul, Critique, Abrahamism
1) Grammar:
(a) rules of “continuous recursive disambiguation” creating a contract for meaning, and consisting of: A Paradigm, consisting of: First Principles, Logic, Vocabulary, Syntax.
(b) Grammars can be DeflationaryInflationary, where deflationary consists of math, logic, accounting, procedures, etc, and inflationary consist of stories, fictions, fictionalisms, deceits, and denials etc.
(c) Operational grammar:
operational grammar consists of complete sentences in promissory form, consisting of a sequence of subjectively testable operations producing complete transactions of changes in state. ie: ‘unambiguous measurements’.
2) Logic:
the test of constant relations between properties reducible to analogy to experience, internally as identity, externally between premises and statements, or externally between statements.
(a) all statements must consist of continuously recursive disambiguation (b) there is no closure other than tautology, (c) all non-tautological tests are falsificationary. (d) falsification requires tests: internal, external, operational, rational, reciprocal, completeness.
3) Truth:
(a)Truth consists of a claim of innocence, by testimony sufficient for the satisfaction of demand for infallibility in the context.
https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/04/24/truth-testimony-that-satisfies-demand-for-infallibility/
(b) Hierarchy of Decidability: Statements are undecidable, possibly true, or certainly false. All logic is Ternary.
(c) A proof provides a test of possibility: a justification. Truth must survive falsification.
4) Justification:
either (a) a moral explanation for a claim of innocence (b) a false pretense that a proof is other than a possibility (c) and an evasion of the cost of falsification. (d) a fraud constructed by the pretense of due diligency by paying the cost of falsification.
5) Sophistry:
(a) General: any use of loading, framing, suggestion, obscuring, conflating, inflating, fictionalism, or denial, to claim consistency in identity, internality, externality, operationality, rationality, reciprocity, or completeness that does not exist.
(b) More specifically, the use of the three means of fictionalism: Physical: Magic to Pseudoscience, Verbal: Sophistry to idealism (philosophy), Imaginary: Occult to Supernaturalism (theology), to convey a pretense of causality or knowledge that cannot be testified to.
7) Pilpul:
(attached) “The Positive Sell” Sophistry that implies a false promise of freedom from formal, physical, natural, or evolutionary laws by use of the following methods: (first image)
8) Critique:
(attached) “The Negative Sell” (second and third images)
(9) MORE IN COMMENTS….
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-07 02:26:11 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107233409170355771
IOW: German Austrian Econ (Menger-Hayek etc) vs Jewish Austrian Econ (Mises-Rothbard etc) I’m referring to the former not the latter: marginalism, incentives, operations, time: “ECONOMIC OPERATIONALISM”
(It wasn’t uncommon to call Austrian econ Jewish Economics back in the day.)
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 22:45:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456754605002526727
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456379748943282181
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
IOW, if you start with Austrian Econ – which is the operational branch economics most emphasizing incentives, then the manosphere is rather obvious. The question is, why would anyone need the lessons of the manosphere if they had learned behavioral econ (incentives) vs norms?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456379748943282181
7) Pilpul: “The Positive Sell” Sophistry that implies a false promise of freedom from formal, physical, natural, or evolutionary laws by use of the following methods: https://t.co/BnMUVjN6vB
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 17:47:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456679507126071301
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456679502982098948
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
6) (b) more specifically, the use of the three means of fictionalism: Physical: Magic to Pseudoscience, Verbal: Sophistry to idealism (philosophy), Imaginary: Occult to Supernaturalism (theology), to convey a pretense of causality or knowledge that cannot be testified to.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456679502982098948
6) (b) more specifically, the use of the three means of fictionalism: Physical: Magic to Pseudoscience, Verbal: Sophistry to idealism (philosophy), Imaginary: Occult to Supernaturalism (theology), to convey a pretense of causality or knowledge that cannot be testified to.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 17:47:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456679502982098948
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456679501279244289
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
5) Sophistry (a) General: any use of loading, framing, suggestion, obscuring, conflating, inflating, fictionalism, or denial, to claim consistency in identity, internality, externality, operationality, rationality, reciprocity, or completeness that does not exist.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456679501279244289
5) Sophistry (a) General: any use of loading, framing, suggestion, obscuring, conflating, inflating, fictionalism, or denial, to claim consistency in identity, internality, externality, operationality, rationality, reciprocity, or completeness that does not exist.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 17:47:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456679501279244289
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456679499488239619
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
4) Justification:either (a) a moral explanation for a claim of innocence (b) a false prtense that a proof is other than a possiblitity (c) and an evasion of the cost of falsification. (d) a fraud constructed by pretense of due diligency by paying the cost of falsification.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456679499488239619
4) Justification:either (a) a moral explanation for a claim of innocence (b) a false prtense that a proof is other than a possiblitity (c) and an evasion of the cost of falsification. (d) a fraud constructed by pretense of due diligency by paying the cost of falsification.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 17:47:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456679499488239619
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456679497835728896
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
(c) A proof provides a test of possibility: a justification. Truth must survive falsification.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456679497835728896
(c) A proof provides a test of possibility: a justification. Truth must survive falsification.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 17:47:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456679497835728896
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456679496048840711
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
3) Truth: (a)Truth consists of a claim of innocence, by testimony sufficient for satisfaction of demand for infallibility in the context.
https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/04/24/truth-testimony-that-satisfies-demand-for-infallibility/
(b) Hierarchy of Decidability: Statements are undecidable, possibly true, or certainly false. All logic is Ternary.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456679496048840711