Colloquially: “The completion of the scientific method for the purpose of the conduct of law”. Testimonial Truth: Testimony (Speech) that is warrantied by the speaker through the performance of due diligence against imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, deception and fraud. The only truth that can exist is that which is spoken. We can never speak the perfect truth because we can never know if we possess it. The most perfect truth we can speak is that which we have performed due diligence, that we do not speak in falsehood: fraud. Testimonialism: A set of tests of due diligence, the satisfaction of which allows us to warranty that to the best of our ability our speech (testimony) is free of the falsehoods: imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, deceit, and fraud. Truth: That testimony we would give if we possessed perfect (complete) knowledge, perfect language, and an audience possessed of the same. And, at that point we speak a name, not a description. Everything has a true name. We seek that name. In seeking it we seek truth. h/t: Nick Zito
Form: Definition
-
Q&A: “Curt; Do You Have a Concise Definition for Testimonialism?”
Colloquially: “The completion of the scientific method for the purpose of the conduct of law”. Testimonial Truth: Testimony (Speech) that is warrantied by the speaker through the performance of due diligence against imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, deception and fraud. The only truth that can exist is that which is spoken. We can never speak the perfect truth because we can never know if we possess it. The most perfect truth we can speak is that which we have performed due diligence, that we do not speak in falsehood: fraud. Testimonialism: A set of tests of due diligence, the satisfaction of which allows us to warranty that to the best of our ability our speech (testimony) is free of the falsehoods: imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, deceit, and fraud. Truth: That testimony we would give if we possessed perfect (complete) knowledge, perfect language, and an audience possessed of the same. And, at that point we speak a name, not a description. Everything has a true name. We seek that name. In seeking it we seek truth. h/t: Nick Zito
-
A Definition of Testimonialism: The art of Truth Telling. #libertarian #conserva
A Definition of Testimonialism: The art of Truth Telling.
#libertarian #conservative #altright #NRx #propertarianism https://t.co/DoWOdzFFlI
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-10 08:41:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/707848964985503745
-
Definition of Testimonialism: The art of Truth Telling. #libertarian #conservati
http://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/707848964985503745/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=707848964985503745A Definition of Testimonialism: The art of Truth Telling.
#libertarian #conservative #altright #NRx #propertarianism https://t.co/DoWOdzFFlI
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-10 03:42:00 UTC
-
Q&A: “Curt; Do you have a concise definition for testimonialism?” Colloquially:
Q&A: “Curt; Do you have a concise definition for testimonialism?”
Colloquially: “The completion of the scientific method for the purpose of the conduct of law”.
Testimonial Truth: Testimony (Speech) that is warrantied by the speaker through the performance of due diligence against imaginary content, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, deception and fraud. The only truth that can exist is that which is spoken. We can never speak the perfect truth because we can never know if we possess it. The most perfect truth we can speak is that which we have performed due diligence, that we do not speak in falsehood: fraud.
Testimonialism: A set of tests of due diligence, the satisfaction of which allows us to warranty that to the best of our ability our speech (testimony) is free of the falsehoods: error, bias, wishful thinking, imaginary relations, suggestion, deceit, and fraud.
Truth: that testimony we would give if we possessed perfect (complete) knowledge, perfect language, and an audience possessed of the same – and at that point we speak a name, not a description. Everything has a true name. We seek it. In seeking it we seek truth.
h/t: Nick Zito
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-10 03:28:00 UTC
-
Defining Revolution. Is Huntington or Aristotle (Or another) Right?
—“A revolution is a rapid, fundamental, and violent domestic change in the dominant values and myths of a society, in its political institutions, social structure, leadership. and government activity and policies. Revolutions are thus to be distinguished from insurrections, rebellions, revolts, coups, and wars of independence. A coup d’etat in itself changes only leadership and perhaps policies; a rebellion of insurrection may change policies, leadership, and political institutions, but no social structure and values; a war of independence is a struggle of one community against rule by an alien community and does not necessarily involve changes in the social structure of either community. What is here called simply “revolution” is what others have called great revolutions, grand revolutions, or social revolutions. Notable examples are the French, Chinese, Mexican, Russian, and Cuban revolutions.”— Samuel Huntington
[B]y Huntington’s criteria, is it revolution I (we) pursue? I did not think so. But at this point I do. For the restoration of truth telling, the suppression of political parasitism, the conversion of information to a commons, the imposition of strict construction, and the imposition of market government, and the eliminationgn of politicians, all are fundamental changes in the postwar feminist/socialist epoch. Even if they are restorations of the anglo saxon order.
-
Defining Revolution. Is Huntington or Aristotle (Or another) Right?
—“A revolution is a rapid, fundamental, and violent domestic change in the dominant values and myths of a society, in its political institutions, social structure, leadership. and government activity and policies. Revolutions are thus to be distinguished from insurrections, rebellions, revolts, coups, and wars of independence. A coup d’etat in itself changes only leadership and perhaps policies; a rebellion of insurrection may change policies, leadership, and political institutions, but no social structure and values; a war of independence is a struggle of one community against rule by an alien community and does not necessarily involve changes in the social structure of either community. What is here called simply “revolution” is what others have called great revolutions, grand revolutions, or social revolutions. Notable examples are the French, Chinese, Mexican, Russian, and Cuban revolutions.”— Samuel Huntington
[B]y Huntington’s criteria, is it revolution I (we) pursue? I did not think so. But at this point I do. For the restoration of truth telling, the suppression of political parasitism, the conversion of information to a commons, the imposition of strict construction, and the imposition of market government, and the eliminationgn of politicians, all are fundamental changes in the postwar feminist/socialist epoch. Even if they are restorations of the anglo saxon order.
-
Liberty: The Offer of Insurance. The Only Possible Liberty That Can Exist.
[I] will insure the liberty of any man of any race in any territory, by use of art and arms, who will insure my liberty in return by use of art and arms. This is Paternalism. Sovereignty. Nobility. Aristocracy. To raise mankind from beast to god – one generation, one father, at a time.
-
Liberty: The Offer of Insurance. The Only Possible Liberty That Can Exist.
[I] will insure the liberty of any man of any race in any territory, by use of art and arms, who will insure my liberty in return by use of art and arms. This is Paternalism. Sovereignty. Nobility. Aristocracy. To raise mankind from beast to god – one generation, one father, at a time.
-
DEFINING REVOLUTION —“A revolution is a rapid, fundamental, and violent domest
DEFINING REVOLUTION
—“A revolution is a rapid, fundamental, and violent domestic change in the dominant values and myths of a society, in its political institutions, social structure, leadership. and government activity and policies. Revolutions are thus to be distinguished from insurrections, rebellions, revolts, coups, and wars of independence. A coup d’etat in itself changes only leadership and perhaps policies; a rebellion of insurrection may change policies, leadership, and political institutions, but no social structure and values; a war of independence is a struggle of one community against rule by an alien community and does not necessarily involve changes in the social structure of either community. What is here called simply “revolution” is what others have called great revolutions, grand revolutions, or social revolutions. Notable examples are the French, Chinese, Mexican, Russian, and Cuban revolutions.”— Samuel Huntington
By Huntington’s criteria, is it revolution I (we) pursue? I did not think so. But at this point I do. For the restoration of truth telling, the suppression of political parasitism, the conversion of information to a commons, the imposition of strict construction, and the imposition of market government, and the eliminationgn of politicians, all are fundamental changes in the postwar feminist/socialist epoch. Even if they are restorations of the anglo saxon order.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-05 13:08:00 UTC