Curt Doolittle

Form: Definition

  • IQ (possible rate evolutionary adaptation) vs Demonstratable in time, and Demons

    IQ (possible rate evolutionary adaptation) vs Demonstratable in time, and Demonstrated Over time Intelligence (accumulated performance).

    IQ refers to the rate of adaptation (responsivess) of the neural network and minor variations in resulting faculties. IQ was identified because peoples faculties scale up and down consistently. Neural networks follow the same math as every other cable network in every field. The genetics, in utero development and organization of the brain plus the biochemical environment it operates in all affect intelligence proper(potential), and the potential for demonstrable and demonstrated intelligence(realized).

    In this sense people are X degree intelligent(potential) and they learn to be Y degree competent (applied)

    Reading and the conscientousness to employ it will assist in neural formation of patterns of general information. It will not increase IQ. IQ as a measure will increase with age as the performance of the brain combined with experience discovers patterns of utility and efficiency of prediction.

    Demonstrated Intelligence
    G, as measured by IQ.
    … Personality Traits (conscientiousness vs neuroticism)
    … … Accumulated General Knowledge
    … … … Accumulated Domain Knowledge
    … … … … Minus “False Beliefs and Values:
    … … … … … Minus “False Goals”
    … … … … … … Minus Traumas.
    Results in demonstrated intelligence.
    But in general, you’re born with hardware you can only screw up. And you’re born with potential that you can only maximize to the point of failure.

    Reply addressees: @Real_SF @KirkegaardEmil

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-16 18:00:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703106541702754304

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703100299911876945

  • DEFINITIONS (The First Principles of The Universal Logic) By Dr Brad 1. The Univ

    DEFINITIONS
    (The First Principles of The Universal Logic)
    By Dr Brad

    1. The Universe’s Zero Point the lowest possible energy state of otherwise empty space that consists of the difference between the cosmic microwave background.

    2. Hierarchy of Zero Points represent the Base Condition of Capitalization (Stable Relations of matter/energy/information) of any Persistent Entity necessary for Persistent Entities to discover and Capitalize (accumulate matter/energy/information) upon the Operational Polarity of a given Domain. If the entity falls below the zero point then it will decompose into a lower state of less complexity and energy.

    3. Operational Polarities define Domains complexity of the organization of energy. From every zero point, of every Domain, the Ternary Logic of that domain consists of an Operational Polarity (difference, Potential) that if equilibrated produces a new dynamic equilibrium for any given Persistent Entity and Between Persistent Entities in that Domain – though, while under certain conditions, certain Persistent Entities produce highly stable relations and are therefore inert(lacking potential for additional recombinations), there are no conditions under which the stable relations and internal equilibrium of any persistent entity is prohibited from devolution back to the Universe’s Zero Point, or evolution to a higher energy state and organization.

    4. First Principle of any domain, in the hierarchy of domains, consists of the label for the complexity of operational polarities when equilibrated produce the new dynamic equilirium for that entity and between persistent entities in that domain, that are available at the scale of complexity in that domain in the hierarchy of domains.

    5. Ternary Logic describes the First Principle available given the Operational Polarities available to Persistent Entitites within Domains in the hierarchy of domains.

    6. Evolutionary Computation describes the operations of Persistent Entities between Domains, across Zero Points, by the use of first principles of equilibrating operational polarities within each domain.

    |Universal Logic|: Zero Point > Operational Polarities > First Principles > Ternary Logic > Evolutionary Computation

    …

    https://t.co/KxoYVWhdX1

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-16 16:41:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703086786396782593

  • NATURAL LAW(=), COMMONALITY(-), AND CONCURRENCY(+) What Are Commonality and Conc

    NATURAL LAW(=), COMMONALITY(-), AND CONCURRENCY(+)
    What Are Commonality and Concurrency, and What Do They Have to Do with Rule of Law?
    https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1672657286425112577

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    WHAT IS THE CAUSE OF THE CRISIS OF OUR AGE?
    (it’s very simple)
    https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1696790575754641851

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1702457362416599458

  • WHAT’S YOUR DEFINITION OF PHILOSOPHY? (Disambiguating philosophy, science, logic

    WHAT’S YOUR DEFINITION OF PHILOSOPHY?
    (Disambiguating philosophy, science, logic, and operations(computation).)

    Given The hierarchical evolution of paradigms:
    Embodiment > Prioprioception > Memory > Prediction > Imitation(body)-empathy(emotions)-sympathizing(mind) > language > Antropomorphism > Mythology > Theology(religion) > Philosophy(literary vs analitic) > Natural Philosophy(Naturalism, data collection and comparative observation) > Empiricism(Geometry and Rational Philosophy) > Science(calculus,testimony) > Logic(Formal and Symbolic, sets, analysis) > Operations(Computation, first principles, laws).

    Evolutionary Cycle
    We discover each of these in sequence from top to bottom, and then reform them backward from bottom to top – at the end we should have a continuously evolving optimum possible prediction, mythology, religion, and philosophy – having solved the demarcation problem and completed the epistemic hierarchy.

    Roles
    We are confident that we have disambiguated Philosophy (justification, value preference, and choice) and Science (investigation, truth, reciprocity, and testimony) and have done so with the endpoint of all possible reasoning in Operationalism(falsification, possibility, computation). As far as we know we have completed the epistemic method.

    Series: Mythology(strategy) > Philosophy (reason) > Science (measurement) > Operation (construction)

    https://t.co/Pj3ju5epyX

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-14 22:41:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702452429852233728

  • WHAT IS A FIRST PRINCIPLE? (law, axiom, first principle, etc)

    WHAT IS A FIRST PRINCIPLE?
    (law, axiom, first principle, etc)
    https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1699556964005470208

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    WHAT ARE THE SIX (EIGHT) HOLES IN THE CONSTITUTION?
    Correcting The Failures of The American Constitution – Our Germanic Origins

    [A]s students of the empirical revolution, the agrarian revolution, the commercial revolution, and the enlightenment, our american civilization was…

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1702440841640325171

  • Consciousness consists of the continuous stream of predictions from the past thr

    Consciousness consists of the continuous stream of predictions from the past three seconds of hierarchical recursive memory including memory of the experience of internal changes in body state, as well as disambiguation of senses from external state into a world model of objects spaces and backgrounds we can move through. A constantly dissipating stream of memory observing itself. There is no observer separate from it. Just as running exists only in motion so does consciousness. That’s the Condensed but accurate answer.

    Reply addressees: @bonnittaroy

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-08 14:40:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700157096757465088

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700116099012984987

  • (basic concepts) “Residues and Derivations” Vilfredo Pareto, in his sociological

    (basic concepts)
    “Residues and Derivations”

    Vilfredo Pareto, in his sociological theory, used the terms “residues and derivations”.

    “Residues” are the persistent and consistent psychological traits that drive human behavior.
    “Derivations” are the ideologies and beliefs that people construct to justify or rationalize their actions.

    This theory is an attempt to delve into the underlying causes of human actions, separating the innate drives (residues) from the constructed narratives (derivations).

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-07 21:05:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699891677245100032

  • Math(measures,continuous), logic(sets,language), reasoning(operations, discrete)

    Math(measures,continuous), logic(sets,language), reasoning(operations, discrete)

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-07 12:09:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699756824012996653

    Reply addressees: @JohannNetram

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699695788723433944

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @petermorris1878 @Nigel_Farage –“Q: Curt: You use the term f

    RT @curtdoolittle: @petermorris1878 @Nigel_Farage –“Q: Curt: You use the term first principle but what does it mean?”– (Definitions)

    Gre…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-07 11:38:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699748888532459559

  • “Q: Curt: You use the term first principle but what does it mean?”– (Definition

    –“Q: Curt: You use the term first principle but what does it mean?”– (Definitions)

    Great question.

    As a discipline of formal operational logic that practices disambiguation by operationalization, we are sometimes in a position where the ‘fuzziness’ of existing usage need…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 22:55:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699556964005470208

    Reply addressees: @petermorris1878 @Nigel_Farage

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699553815094010355