Curt Doolittle

Form: Definition

  • “WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN COMMUNISM AND LIBERTARIANISM?”— In **COMMUNISM

    —“WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN COMMUNISM AND LIBERTARIANISM?”—

    In **COMMUNISM** private property is abolished in order to create exclusively *common* property. *(Rule By Discretion)*

    In **LIBERTARIANISM**, common property is abolished in order to create exclusively *private* property. *(Anarchy)*

    In **CLASSICAL LIBERALISM** (Rule of Law), the houses of government constitute a *market* for the voluntary production of commons between the people who pay for them with sacrifice of their private property. *(Rule of Law)*

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-29 11:09:00 UTC

  • If Mathematics Is An Exact Science, Why Are There Assumptions?

    As far as I know, mathematics consists not of science but of a logic. A logic meaning a grammar of decidability. And in the case of mathematics, the grammar of decidability consists of reduction of all references to positional names, and therefore all relations to positional relations. And we can do so with an unlimited number of dimensions,

    A science is necessary when we do not know the first principles (causal relations) of phenomenon and seek to identify them. Science therefore consists of theories and laws.

    A logic is necessary when we do know the first principles (causal relations). Ergo, logics consist of axioms.

    You can declare an axiom, but only identify a law.

    Once a law is known you may model it with axioms.

    That I know of there are only two assumptions in mathematics, and both are necessary for the simple reason that independent of context (applied mathematics) we have no means of decidability in matters of scale independence.

    The law of the excluded middle.
    The need for choice.

    Mathematics is actually quite simple. Its that because it is so simple, consisting only of positional relations, we can describe any set of constant relations with it.

    https://www.quora.com/If-mathematics-is-an-exact-science-why-are-there-assumptions

  • In Laymans Terms, How Would You Define The “free Market”?

    That prices are determined by market forces independent of state interference. There is no perfectly free trade. And in the current era the value of free trade is no longer what the classical economists suggested.

    https://www.quora.com/In-Laymans-terms-how-would-you-define-the-free-market

  • In Laymans Terms, How Would You Define The “free Market”?

    That prices are determined by market forces independent of state interference. There is no perfectly free trade. And in the current era the value of free trade is no longer what the classical economists suggested.

    https://www.quora.com/In-Laymans-terms-how-would-you-define-the-free-market

  • by Eli Harman 1 – ROYALTY: the sovereignty. 2 – NOBILITY: intergenerationally ex

    by Eli Harman 1 – ROYALTY: the sovereignty. 2 – NOBILITY: intergenerationally exceptional families. 3 – ARISTOCRACY: the martial elite. 4 – CITIZENS: productive, self-supporting, stakeholders who perform militial service. 5 – COMMONERS: productive, self-supporting, individuals subsidiary to the above. 6 – PEASANTS: dependent underclasses.

  • by Eli Harman 1 – ROYALTY: the sovereignty. 2 – NOBILITY: intergenerationally ex

    by Eli Harman

    1 – ROYALTY: the sovereignty.

    2 – NOBILITY: intergenerationally exceptional families.

    3 – ARISTOCRACY: the martial elite.

    4 – CITIZENS: productive, self-supporting, stakeholders who perform militial service.

    5 – COMMONERS: productive, self-supporting, individuals subsidiary to the above.

    6 – PEASANTS: dependent underclasses.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 18:37:00 UTC

  • by Eli Harman 1 – ROYALTY: the sovereignty. 2 – NOBILITY: intergenerationally ex

    by Eli Harman 1 – ROYALTY: the sovereignty. 2 – NOBILITY: intergenerationally exceptional families. 3 – ARISTOCRACY: the martial elite. 4 – CITIZENS: productive, self-supporting, stakeholders who perform militial service. 5 – COMMONERS: productive, self-supporting, individuals subsidiary to the above. 6 – PEASANTS: dependent underclasses.

  • Are You Racist?

    I ANSWER HARD QUESTIONS – LARGELY IN ORDER TO PREVENT LYING BY STATEMENTS, SUGGESTION OR IMPLICATION.

    Racism is, as I understand it, refers to four behaviors:

    1) the process of treating an individual by the properties of his class (race) rather than waiting to ascertain the properties that he himself demonstrates. In other words, stereotyping. Unfortunately stereotypes are the most accurate measurement in the social sciences. So this is difficult to counteract outside of commercial interactions.

    2) the process of criticizing a class (race) for the costs that they impose on your class (race) rather than taking actions that prevent a class (race) from imposing costs upon your class (race).

    3) the process of denying that there are differences in aggregate class (race) abilities, biases, preferences, and behaviors.

    4) the process of conducting genocidal, political, economic, and kinship warfare by denying that there are differences in aggregate class (race) abilities, biases, preferences, and behaviors.

    Racism is not any of these four behaviors:

    1) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that there are differences in aggregate class (race) abilities, biases, preferences, and behaviors.

    2) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that people (like all creatures) favor their class (kin, tribe, race) group for the simple reason that except as outliers, it is in their status, social, reproductive, economic, and political interests to do so.

    3) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that people vote in democracies heavily by race, gender, and class, thereby competing by EQUAL political vote rather than by unequal economic, intellectual, or military means.

    4) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that people conduct informational and political warfare instead of economic and violent warfare, by the denial of differences in abilities, biases, preferences, behaviors, intentions, and goals.

    That’s simply empirical science.

    And arguing against it is simply lying.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine.

    https://www.quora.com/Are-you-racist-2

  • Do You Know The Difference? Religion Vs Ideology Vs Philosophy Vs Logic Vs Mathematics Vs Science

    – A RELIGION consists of any set of ideas of justification which require belief in, testimony to, or action according to, one or more falsehoods as a cost of inclusion and use. – AN IDEOLOGY consist of any set of ideas that agitate, motivate, or inspire achievement of political ends under majoritarian (monopoly) democracy. An ideology need not be internally consistent externally correspondent, or existentially possible. It need only motivate individuals to act in furtherance of policy. – A PHILOSOPHY consists of any set of internally consistent ideas of decidability which justify pursuit of personal preferences or group goods. – A LOGIC consists of any deflationary grammar of decidability that assists in the falsification by competition of one or more constant relations between states. (Note that one proves nothing logically other than internal consistency, because all premises of external correspondence are forever contingent.) – MATHEMATICS consists of a deflationary grammar of decidability consisting purely of competition between positional names under the preservation of ratios providing a single axis of decidability: position, but in N dimensions, providing commensurability between any set of positional relations of any number of dimensions. – A SCIENCE consists of any set of ideas that provide decidability independent of personal preference or group goods, by the systematic elimination of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit, by the use of measurement and record of actions – demonstrations versus words. – NATURAL LAW of RECIPROCITY (Tort), was produced scientifically (empirically) by trial and error, through the resolution of disputes across personal preferences, group goods, norms, traditions, and intuitions, cumulating always and everywhere that decidability is provided by property, and property consists in the demonstrated investment of human action or inaction anything whether genetic, material, behavioral, or informational.

  • DO YOU KNOW THE DIFFERENCE? RELIGION VS IDEOLOGY VS PHILOSOPHY VS LOGIC VS MATHE

    DO YOU KNOW THE DIFFERENCE? RELIGION VS IDEOLOGY VS PHILOSOPHY VS LOGIC VS MATHEMATICS VS SCIENCE

    – A RELIGION consists of any set of ideas of justification which require belief in, testimony to, or action according to, one or more falsehoods as a cost of inclusion and use.

    – AN IDEOLOGY consist of any set of ideas that agitate, motivate, or inspire achievement of political ends under majoritarian (monopoly) democracy. An ideology need not be internally consistent externally correspondent, or existentially possible. It need only motivate individuals to act in furtherance of policy.

    – A PHILOSOPHY consists of any set of internally consistent ideas of decidability which justify pursuit of personal preferences or group goods.

    – A LOGIC consists of any deflationary grammar of decidability that assists in the falsification by competition of one or more constant relations between states. (Note that one proves nothing logically other than internal consistency, because all premises of external correspondence are forever contingent.)

    – MATHEMATICS consists of a deflationary grammar of decidability consisting purely of competition between positional names under the preservation of ratios providing a single axis of decidability: position, but in N dimensions, providing commensurability between any set of positional relations of any number of dimensions.

    – A SCIENCE consists of any set of ideas that provide decidability independent of personal preference or group goods, by the systematic elimination of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit, by the use of measurement and record of actions – demonstrations versus words.

    – NATURAL LAW of RECIPROCITY (Tort), was produced scientifically (empirically) by trial and error, through the resolution of disputes across personal preferences, group goods, norms, traditions, and intuitions, cumulating always and everywhere that decidability is provided by property, and property consists in the demonstrated investment of human action or inaction anything whether genetic, material, behavioral, or informational.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-26 15:43:00 UTC