Form: Definition

  • THE MATTER OF ROME —“According to the medieval poet Jean Bodel, the Matter of

    THE MATTER OF ROME

    —“According to the medieval poet Jean Bodel, the Matter of Rome was the literary cycle made up of Greek and Roman mythology, together with episodes from the history of classical antiquity, focusing on military heroes like Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar. Bodel divided all the literary cycles he knew best into the Matter of Britain, the Matter of France and the Matter of Rome. The Matter of Rome also included what is referred to as the Matter of Troy, consisting of romances and other texts based on the Trojan War and its after-effects, including the adventures of Aeneas.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 17:29:00 UTC

  • MATTER OF ENGLAND

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_of_EnglandTHE MATTER OF ENGLAND


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 15:47:00 UTC

  • MATTER OF IRELAND”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulster_Cycle”THE MATTER OF IRELAND”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulster_Cycle


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 15:46:00 UTC

  • MATTER OF IRELAND”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulster_Cycle”THE MATTER OF IRELAND”


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 15:46:00 UTC

  • Man Is Amoral

    Man is wired (evolved) to know what is in his interests, what will cause retaliation, and what will purchase options on future cooperation, and that he must punish cheaters(defectors). It’s just in our interests, increasingly, to act morally, because of the returns on moral cooperation, but if you look at history and if you look at the total absence outside of western civilizatino of high trust other than perhaps japane (which sacrifices truth for it), then the answer is just the opposite. If I accomplish anything I hope to eradictate is christian/rousseauian/feminine fantasy that man is wired for morality. Man evolved to be eminently practical: the act predatorially, parasiticlaly, reciproccally, and to invest, as opportunity presents itself. We are just an extension of the laws of physics, and our only difference is the ability to use memory to keep accounting of whether we’re gaining or losing over time in an environment of possible cooperation.

  • Negative and Positive Manners, Ethics, Morals and Laws.

    Negative manners, ethics, morals, and law are universal. Positive manners, ethics and morals are agency and therefore class dependent. We had it right until christianity imposed a universalist slave monopoly. Just as the Ashkenazi have tried through marxism, libertarianism, and neo-conservatism to impose a universalist monopoly of the working, trading, and ruling classes.

  • Negative and Positive Manners, Ethics, Morals and Laws.

    Negative manners, ethics, morals, and law are universal. Positive manners, ethics and morals are agency and therefore class dependent. We had it right until christianity imposed a universalist slave monopoly. Just as the Ashkenazi have tried through marxism, libertarianism, and neo-conservatism to impose a universalist monopoly of the working, trading, and ruling classes.

  • The Reason Most People Are Confused Is Simply a Failure to Speak in Operational Grammar,

    RECIPROCITY 1) Acting Reciprocally is necessary for cooperation to survive in any life form (or post-life for that matter). All life forms that do not practice reciprocity must go extinct, because consumption (use of resources) is not calculable. TRAINING 2) Tit for tat, and exhaustive tit for tat, are strategies to train for preserving reciprocity. (an investment) However, they require memory. Hence why it’s only possible for creatures with memory. MORALITY 3) Morality is the name for the value judgement we assign to reciprocity. ( a value judgement). Actions are moral, amoral, or immoral, if they are reciprocal, fully internal, or irreciprocal. MORAL NORMS 4) Moral Rules (moral norms) are those surviving habits of reciprocity in any social order. ETHICAL, MORAL, AUTISTIC 5) Ethics refers to conditions of the interpersonal (non-anonymous but informationally asymmetric), and Morals refers to conditions of the extra personal (anonymous and informationally asymmetric). Technically actions that are neither interpersonal nor anonymous (affecting only the self) are “Autistic”. — is = exists as. If you think you know what you’re talking about don’t use is, are, was, were, etc. It will demonstrate whether you do or not if you can manage to make a complete and grammatically correct statement without the ‘fudge’ words (verb to be) that mean everything deducible from your statement (premise) is false. I’m very careful with it. is/are=exists as. The reason most people are confused is simply a failure to speak in operational (correct) grammar, while trying to make arguments requiring infungible premises. Every moron who argues with me (present company not included) will jump on teh autistic bandwagon not realizing that if they cannot speak precisely and operationally they are either hand waving to cover their reliance on intuition rather than argument, or engaging in rationalism (justification) which is the intellectual cancer Kant imposed upon our poor european cousins.

  • The Reason Most People Are Confused Is Simply a Failure to Speak in Operational Grammar,

    RECIPROCITY 1) Acting Reciprocally is necessary for cooperation to survive in any life form (or post-life for that matter). All life forms that do not practice reciprocity must go extinct, because consumption (use of resources) is not calculable. TRAINING 2) Tit for tat, and exhaustive tit for tat, are strategies to train for preserving reciprocity. (an investment) However, they require memory. Hence why it’s only possible for creatures with memory. MORALITY 3) Morality is the name for the value judgement we assign to reciprocity. ( a value judgement). Actions are moral, amoral, or immoral, if they are reciprocal, fully internal, or irreciprocal. MORAL NORMS 4) Moral Rules (moral norms) are those surviving habits of reciprocity in any social order. ETHICAL, MORAL, AUTISTIC 5) Ethics refers to conditions of the interpersonal (non-anonymous but informationally asymmetric), and Morals refers to conditions of the extra personal (anonymous and informationally asymmetric). Technically actions that are neither interpersonal nor anonymous (affecting only the self) are “Autistic”. — is = exists as. If you think you know what you’re talking about don’t use is, are, was, were, etc. It will demonstrate whether you do or not if you can manage to make a complete and grammatically correct statement without the ‘fudge’ words (verb to be) that mean everything deducible from your statement (premise) is false. I’m very careful with it. is/are=exists as. The reason most people are confused is simply a failure to speak in operational (correct) grammar, while trying to make arguments requiring infungible premises. Every moron who argues with me (present company not included) will jump on teh autistic bandwagon not realizing that if they cannot speak precisely and operationally they are either hand waving to cover their reliance on intuition rather than argument, or engaging in rationalism (justification) which is the intellectual cancer Kant imposed upon our poor european cousins.

  • RECIPROCITY 1) Acting Reciprocally is necessary for cooperation to survive in an

    RECIPROCITY

    1) Acting Reciprocally is necessary for cooperation to survive in any life form (or post-life for that matter). All life forms that do not practice reciprocity must go extinct, because consumption (use of resources) is not calculable.

    TRAINING

    2) Tit for tat, and exhaustive tit for tat, are strategies to train for preserving reciprocity. (an investment) However, they require memory. Hence why it’s only possible for creatures with memory.

    MORALITY

    3) Morality is the name for the value judgement we assign to reciprocity. ( a value judgement). Actions are moral, amoral, or immoral, if they are reciprocal, fully internal, or irreciprocal.

    MORAL NORMS

    4) Moral Rules (moral norms) are those surviving habits of reciprocity in any social order.

    ETHICAL, MORAL, AUTISTIC

    5) Ethics refers to conditions of the interpersonal (non-anonymous but informationally asymmetric), and Morals refers to conditions of the extra personal (anonymous and informationally asymmetric). Technically actions that are neither interpersonal nor anonymous (affecting only the self) are “Autistic”.



    is = exists as. If you think you know what you’re talking about don’t use is, are, was, were, etc. It will demonstrate whether you do or not if you can manage to make a complete and grammatically correct statement without the ‘fudge’ words (verb to be) that mean everything deducible from your statement (premise) is false. I’m very careful with it. is/are=exists as.

    The reason most people are confused is simply a failure to speak in operational (correct) grammar, while trying to make arguments requiring infungible premises.

    Every moron who argues with me (present company not included) will jump on teh autistic bandwagon not realizing that if they cannot speak precisely and operationally they are either hand waving to cover their reliance on intuition rather than argument, or engaging in rationalism (justification) which is the intellectual cancer Kant imposed upon our poor european cousins.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-06 16:19:00 UTC