NATIONALISM (Markets)(Packs)(Male Strategy)(K): (Self Preservation, Self Evolution.) Physical separation of a people of common kinship, norms, traditions, values, and mythos by geographic boundary, and the creation of institutions that maximize the commons for their competitive and evolutionary benefit. SECESSIONISM (Self Defense) Physical Separation by geographic boundary and the creation of new institutions of cooperation. SEPARATISM (Parasitism) The practice of creating a culture within a host culture, and non-integration with the host culture, in particular, different religions, traditions, values, and especially ethics and laws. DIVERSITY (Bottom-Up Colonization) Conquest of a host society by incremental colonization of demographics, territory, norms, traditions, values, ethics, laws, and finally institutions. COLONIZATION (Top Down Colonization) Conquest of a territory, society, and population by the imposition of institutions, laws, ethics, values, traditions, and norms GLOBALISM (Monopoly)(Herds)(Female Strategy)(r): (Conquest, Devolution) The destruction of kinship and kin groups, self determination, self defense, self evolution through Colonization of norms, traditions, values, myths, Institutions, and geographic boundaries.
Form: Definition
-
In my Glossary (((Abrahamism))) refers to the argumentative technique of using P
In my Glossary (((Abrahamism))) refers to the argumentative technique of using Pilpul (positiva), and critique (negativa) to construct sophisms w/ loading, framing,suggestion, obscurantism,overloading, Fictionalism,appeals to reasonableness, and false promise, to create hazards.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-23 17:52:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1010581396769984513
-
EMOTIONS ARE REACTIONS TO CHANGES IN STATE OF CAPITAL To put a bit finer point o
EMOTIONS ARE REACTIONS TO CHANGES IN STATE OF CAPITAL
To put a bit finer point on the argument below, Emotions are reactions to changes in state of “capital” that we either have, or might have: obtaining it, saving it, or holding options on past present and future utility of it. That utility can reduce our physical, intellectual, emotional, reproductive, or time costs. Our “values” influence us in the sense that the value we attribute to any given form of capital varies according to our gender, class, ability, condition, and inventory of existing capital.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-22 16:03:00 UTC
-
Understanding Deflationary Truth
(Core Concept) (Attn: SG Simmons) || Ordinary Language Grammar > Deflationary Truth > Performative Truth > *Testimonial Truth*. Deflationary Theories of Truth —“That assertions of predicate truth of a statement do not attribute a property called “truth” to such a statement.”— In other words, “I smell the scent of violets” has the same content as “it is true that I smell the scent of violets”. Performative Theory of Truth —“Peter Strawson formulated a performative theory of truth in the 1950s. Like Ramsey, Strawson believed that there was no separate problem of truth apart from determining the semantic contents (or facts of the world) which give the words and sentences of language the meanings that they have. Once the questions of meaning and reference are resolved, there is no further question of truth. Strawson’s view differs from Ramsey’s, however, in that Strawson maintains that there is an important role for the expression “is true” : specifically, it has a performative role similar to “I promise to clean the house”. In asserting that p is true, we not only assert that p but also perform the “speech act” of confirming the truth of a statement in a context. We signal our agreement or approbation of a previously uttered assertion or confirm some commonly held belief or imply that what we are asserting is likely to be accepted by others in the same context.”— Testimonial Truth (Natural Law > Testimonialism) (Doolittle) “I promise [statement], is not false (is true), and I warranty that I have done due diligence in each of the actionable dimensions possible for human falsification.” With Testimonial Truth assuming ‘warranty’, just as promissory truth assumes ‘I promise’, just as deflationary truths assume “is true”. So instead of “I promise [statement] is true, and warranty that I have performed due diligence necessary to make that promise of truth.” On simply states “[statement]”. It means that all speech must be interpreted as Testimony: So when we say “I smell the scent of violets”; …. in testimony that means: “I promise that I smell the scent of violets and that what I say is not false (is true), and I warranty that I have done due diligence in each of the actionable dimensions possible for human falsification.” And what’s not obvious is this: It is very hard to state a falsehood in this form of prose, and not be visibly accountable (to blame) for your words. And conversely, if you cannot state something in this form of prose, the question is why? And the answer can only be ‘fraud’ or ‘free riding’. TESTIMONIALISM Testimonialism provides the criteria (list of methods of due diligence) that enable us to claim we have performed that due diligence and can warranty our words. Next we need to understand Ordinary Language, Conflation, Inflation, and Deflation…. (continued)
-
Understanding Deflationary Truth
(Core Concept) (Attn: SG Simmons) || Ordinary Language Grammar > Deflationary Truth > Performative Truth > *Testimonial Truth*. Deflationary Theories of Truth —“That assertions of predicate truth of a statement do not attribute a property called “truth” to such a statement.”— In other words, “I smell the scent of violets” has the same content as “it is true that I smell the scent of violets”. Performative Theory of Truth —“Peter Strawson formulated a performative theory of truth in the 1950s. Like Ramsey, Strawson believed that there was no separate problem of truth apart from determining the semantic contents (or facts of the world) which give the words and sentences of language the meanings that they have. Once the questions of meaning and reference are resolved, there is no further question of truth. Strawson’s view differs from Ramsey’s, however, in that Strawson maintains that there is an important role for the expression “is true” : specifically, it has a performative role similar to “I promise to clean the house”. In asserting that p is true, we not only assert that p but also perform the “speech act” of confirming the truth of a statement in a context. We signal our agreement or approbation of a previously uttered assertion or confirm some commonly held belief or imply that what we are asserting is likely to be accepted by others in the same context.”— Testimonial Truth (Natural Law > Testimonialism) (Doolittle) “I promise [statement], is not false (is true), and I warranty that I have done due diligence in each of the actionable dimensions possible for human falsification.” With Testimonial Truth assuming ‘warranty’, just as promissory truth assumes ‘I promise’, just as deflationary truths assume “is true”. So instead of “I promise [statement] is true, and warranty that I have performed due diligence necessary to make that promise of truth.” On simply states “[statement]”. It means that all speech must be interpreted as Testimony: So when we say “I smell the scent of violets”; …. in testimony that means: “I promise that I smell the scent of violets and that what I say is not false (is true), and I warranty that I have done due diligence in each of the actionable dimensions possible for human falsification.” And what’s not obvious is this: It is very hard to state a falsehood in this form of prose, and not be visibly accountable (to blame) for your words. And conversely, if you cannot state something in this form of prose, the question is why? And the answer can only be ‘fraud’ or ‘free riding’. TESTIMONIALISM Testimonialism provides the criteria (list of methods of due diligence) that enable us to claim we have performed that due diligence and can warranty our words. Next we need to understand Ordinary Language, Conflation, Inflation, and Deflation…. (continued)
-
Understanding Deflationary Grammar (and Dimensions)
(Core Concepts) (attn: SG Simmons ) |Grammars| Deflationary <– Ordinary –> Conflationary -> Inflationary INFLATIONARY: To Inflate = “To Add To” Narrative: ‘filling in’ with assumptions so that snippets of what was actually observed can be told as a story. Loading, Framing, Overloading: Loading and Framing: To add emotional weight (opinion or value) that is subject or false, as a means of appealing to intuition rather than truth. To selectively include or organize information to create a suggestion. To selectively exclude information to remove it from consideration. To overload with information in order to produce confusion or undecidability. Fiction: creating a narrative arc that answers change in state (some combination of rise and fall), typically to convey a lesson, or accountability. Fictionalism: creating a fictional account using ideal, imaginary references. CONFLATIONARY: Conflate = “To Confuse” To equate or cast as similar that which shares no, few, or insufficient equality of properties. ORDINARY Common speech in all its forms. DEFLATIONARY: To selectively remove semantic dimensions (ranges of information) such that only information related to the decidability in question remains. Math, logic, software algorithms, recipes-formulae-protocols, operational language, and legal testimony are examples of deflationary grammars. DIMENSIONS For example Temporal Logic tests the constant relation of time between two statements. However, any relationship between constant relations can be tested by tests of constant relations. As such deflationary grammars have been developed to assist us in producing well formed sentences (transactions) with which we can test one, more or many dimensions (sets of relations).
-
Understanding Deflationary Grammar (and Dimensions)
(Core Concepts) (attn: SG Simmons ) |Grammars| Deflationary <– Ordinary –> Conflationary -> Inflationary INFLATIONARY: To Inflate = “To Add To” Narrative: ‘filling in’ with assumptions so that snippets of what was actually observed can be told as a story. Loading, Framing, Overloading: Loading and Framing: To add emotional weight (opinion or value) that is subject or false, as a means of appealing to intuition rather than truth. To selectively include or organize information to create a suggestion. To selectively exclude information to remove it from consideration. To overload with information in order to produce confusion or undecidability. Fiction: creating a narrative arc that answers change in state (some combination of rise and fall), typically to convey a lesson, or accountability. Fictionalism: creating a fictional account using ideal, imaginary references. CONFLATIONARY: Conflate = “To Confuse” To equate or cast as similar that which shares no, few, or insufficient equality of properties. ORDINARY Common speech in all its forms. DEFLATIONARY: To selectively remove semantic dimensions (ranges of information) such that only information related to the decidability in question remains. Math, logic, software algorithms, recipes-formulae-protocols, operational language, and legal testimony are examples of deflationary grammars. DIMENSIONS For example Temporal Logic tests the constant relation of time between two statements. However, any relationship between constant relations can be tested by tests of constant relations. As such deflationary grammars have been developed to assist us in producing well formed sentences (transactions) with which we can test one, more or many dimensions (sets of relations).
-
UNDERSTANDING DEFLATIONARY GRAMMAR (AND DIMENSIONS) (Core Concepts) (attn: SG Si
UNDERSTANDING DEFLATIONARY GRAMMAR (AND DIMENSIONS)
(Core Concepts) (attn: SG Simmons )
|Grammars| Deflationary <– Ordinary –> Conflationary -> Inflationary
INFLATIONARY:
To Inflate = “To Add To”
Narrative: ‘filling in’ with assumptions so that snippets of what was actually observed can be told as a story.
Loading, Framing, Overloading: Loading and Framing: To add emotional weight (opinion or value) that is subject or false, as a means of appealing to intuition rather than truth. To selectively include or organize information to create a suggestion. To selectively exclude information to remove it from consideration. To overload with information in order to produce confusion or undecidability.
Fiction: creating a narrative arc that answers change in state (some combination of rise and fall), typically to convey a lesson, or accountability.
Fictionalism: creating a fictional account using ideal, imaginary references.
CONFLATIONARY:
Conflate = “To Confuse”
To equate or cast as similar that which shares no, few, or insufficient equality of properties.
ORDINARY
Common speech in all its forms.
DEFLATIONARY:
To selectively remove semantic dimensions (ranges of information) such that only information related to the decidability in question remains.
Math, logic, software algorithms, recipes-formulae-protocols, operational language, and legal testimony are examples of deflationary grammars.
DIMENSIONS
For example Temporal Logic tests the constant relation of time between two statements. However, any relationship between constant relations can be tested by tests of constant relations. As such deflationary grammars have been developed to assist us in producing well formed sentences (transactions) with which we can test one, more or many dimensions (sets of relations).
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-20 13:23:00 UTC
-
Define Operationalism
OPERATIONALISM? —“Define operation(alism)”— Let Me Google That For You: Scientific Method -> …. Operational Definition -> …. …. Operationalism (Physical Sciences) / …. …. Operationism (Psychology) / …. …. Intuitionism (Mathematics) / …. …. Praxeology (Economics) ie: “Actions”. See Wiki for simple versions, and Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy for advanced versions. HOWEVER, since all science must be falsificationary, all arguments to justificationism (positivism) are false. As such the value of operational language (grammar and semantics) is to force empirical (existential) description as a means of avoiding hand waving, obscurantism, suggestion, and deceit. OTHER CONCEPTS Critical Rationalism Critical Preference Justificationism Falsificationism Propertarianism (Vitruvianism, Acquisitionism, Propertarianism, Testimonialism, Natural Law) is all Falsificationary. In other words, like evolution, that which survives falsification is potentially true. And justification either is neutral or reduces the empirical (measurable) content of an argument. VIA NEGATIVA (FALSIFICATION) VS VIA POSITIVA (JUSTIFICATION) So imagine a pair of sculptors, one working in stone, subtracting (falsificationism), and the other working in clay, adding, (justificationism). The two must match, or one, the other, or both is false. In other words, just as the only test of production is a voluntary exchange, the only test of truth is survival in the market for competition. -
Define Operationalism
OPERATIONALISM? —“Define operation(alism)”— Let Me Google That For You: Scientific Method -> …. Operational Definition -> …. …. Operationalism (Physical Sciences) / …. …. Operationism (Psychology) / …. …. Intuitionism (Mathematics) / …. …. Praxeology (Economics) ie: “Actions”. See Wiki for simple versions, and Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy for advanced versions. HOWEVER, since all science must be falsificationary, all arguments to justificationism (positivism) are false. As such the value of operational language (grammar and semantics) is to force empirical (existential) description as a means of avoiding hand waving, obscurantism, suggestion, and deceit. OTHER CONCEPTS Critical Rationalism Critical Preference Justificationism Falsificationism Propertarianism (Vitruvianism, Acquisitionism, Propertarianism, Testimonialism, Natural Law) is all Falsificationary. In other words, like evolution, that which survives falsification is potentially true. And justification either is neutral or reduces the empirical (measurable) content of an argument. VIA NEGATIVA (FALSIFICATION) VS VIA POSITIVA (JUSTIFICATION) So imagine a pair of sculptors, one working in stone, subtracting (falsificationism), and the other working in clay, adding, (justificationism). The two must match, or one, the other, or both is false. In other words, just as the only test of production is a voluntary exchange, the only test of truth is survival in the market for competition.