OK. LET ME HELP YOU.
Science: Operational Falsification.
Rationalism: Verbal Justification.
Religion: Supernatural Authoritarianism.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 00:45:00 UTC
OK. LET ME HELP YOU.
Science: Operational Falsification.
Rationalism: Verbal Justification.
Religion: Supernatural Authoritarianism.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 00:45:00 UTC
Female mode of argument: The implied threat of reproductive denial and shaming or harming those who may grant you reproductive access. polluting the market for access to reproductive exercise. The problem is, when the critic’s APPROVAL or DISAPPROVAL is of no value, then… that strategy is meaningless.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 22:41:00 UTC
I have a framework called testimony: internally consistent, externally correspondent, operationally describable, rational of choice, reciprocal of rational choice, limited, fully accounted, and parsimonious. As far as I know that is ever dimension of perception available to man.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-12 16:54:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017452150996299777
Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim @egoissocial @IberianSoldier
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017383367388561408
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017383367388561408
“woo” (slang) uncritical belief in unsubstantiated or unfounded ideas – particularly pseudoscientific, supernatural, and occult.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-11 17:52:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1017104387938938880
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
“woo” (slang) uncritical belief in unsubstantiated or unfounded ideas – particularly pseudoscientific, supernatural, and occult.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-11 17:52:27 UTC
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
ETHNOCENTRICITY ALWAYS WINS
—“ethnocentric strategies dominate other possible strategies (selfish, traitorous, and humanitarian) based on cooperation or non-cooperation with in-group and out-group agents. Here we show that ethnocentrism eventually overcomes its closest competitor, humanitarianism, by exploiting humanitarian cooperation across group boundaries as world population saturates. Selfish and traitorous strategies are self-limiting because such agents do not cooperate with agents sharing the same genes. Traitorous strategies fare even worse than selfish ones because traitors are exploited by ethnocentrics across group boundaries in the same manner as humanitarians are, via unreciprocated cooperation.”—
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-11 17:17:13 UTC
In Propertarianism, Law is algorithmically constructed and the only test of equality (decidability) is reciprocity.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-11 16:19:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
TEMPORAL VS INTERTEMPORAL DECIDABILITY
The difference between law and science is that in questions of law, individuals in conflict demand a decision from judge and jury in the present where in science we explicitly deny this demand, and in philosophy where we never do so, and in religion we presume it already made.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-11 14:46:50 UTC
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
GENERAL IDEAS: A “FIELD” IN MATHEMATICS
(repost by request)
Given a six sided die, and the single operation âroll the dieâ, we can produce a noisy distribution of :
1(x1), 2(x1), 3(x1), 4(x1), 5(x1), 6(x1).
Given two six sided dice, and the single operation âroll the dice and sum the resultsâ, we can produce a noisy distribution of:
2(x1), 3(x2), 4(x3), 5(x4), 6(x5), 7(x6), 8(x5), 9(x4),
10(x3), 11(x2), 12(x1).
The difference between the one-die and two-die distributions is that while the results of rolling one die are equidistributed between 1 and 6, with two dice the results of rolling can produce more combinations that sum to 7 than there are that sum to 2 and 12, and therefor the results are normally distributed: in a bell curve.
We can produce the same results with logic instead of numbers: For example, we can take the two words “Even” and “Odd”, and define two operations: “addition” and “multiplication”. Then apply the operations to all pairs:
Even + Even = Even,
Even + Odd = Odd + Even = Odd,
Odd + Odd = Even,
Even x Even = Even x Odd = Odd x Even = Even,
Odd x Odd = Odd.
And we can produce the same set of results with *any grammatically correct operations on a set, given the operations possible on the set*; including the set of Ordinary Language using Ordinary Language grammar. Although, unlike our simple examples using dice, the set of combinations of ordinary language is not closed, and so the number of combinations is infinite.
So any grammar allows us to produce a distribution of results, and a density (frequency) of result.
In mathematics this result set is called a âfieldâ. A field consists of all the possible results of a set of operations on a setâs members, that are selected from the range of possible operations on those set members.
So in any set of results there will be a range of very dense, less dense, sparse, and empty spaces in the setâs distribution.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-11 14:22:25 UTC
“woo” (slang) uncritical belief in unsubstantiated or unfounded ideas – particularly pseudoscientific, supernatural, and occult.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-11 13:52:00 UTC