(FB 1550432062 Timestamp) PROPERTARIAN NATURAL LAW VS CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATION VS LEGISLATION VS REGULATION Propertarian natural law used to create normative (political) law – but truthfully. Meaning that we must give special dispensation to devout christians to lie about magic nonsense, just as we give special dispensation to the Amish. But in matters of law, no. Ie: we can re-christianize the public spaces etc, and re-paganize the public spaces, and re-lionize (heroes) the public spaces … if we want. We just must state that christians exchange prohibition on making truth claims about magic nonsense in exchange for free practice of the religion. And once that constitutional trade is made, it cannot be modified. In practice this is what exists today. Except we cannot outlaw judaism and islam for being counter to natural law. Whereas christianity is only counter to the justification of natural law. This is why these are problems for smart people. They are hard problems.
Form: Definition
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550420896 Timestamp) ETYMOLOGY: ‘RABBLE’ rabble (n) c. 1300, “pack of animals,” possibly related to Middle English rablen “to gabble, speak in a rapid, confused manner,” probably imitative of hurry, noise, and confusion (compare Middle Dutch rabbelen, Low German rabbeln “to chatter”). Meaning “tumultuous crowd of vulgar, noisy people” is from late 14c.; applied contemptuously to the common or low part of any populace from 1550s. (someone used the term and I realized I didn’t know its origin)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550432062 Timestamp) PROPERTARIAN NATURAL LAW VS CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATION VS LEGISLATION VS REGULATION Propertarian natural law used to create normative (political) law – but truthfully. Meaning that we must give special dispensation to devout christians to lie about magic nonsense, just as we give special dispensation to the Amish. But in matters of law, no. Ie: we can re-christianize the public spaces etc, and re-paganize the public spaces, and re-lionize (heroes) the public spaces … if we want. We just must state that christians exchange prohibition on making truth claims about magic nonsense in exchange for free practice of the religion. And once that constitutional trade is made, it cannot be modified. In practice this is what exists today. Except we cannot outlaw judaism and islam for being counter to natural law. Whereas christianity is only counter to the justification of natural law. This is why these are problems for smart people. They are hard problems.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550420896 Timestamp) ETYMOLOGY: ‘RABBLE’ rabble (n) c. 1300, “pack of animals,” possibly related to Middle English rablen “to gabble, speak in a rapid, confused manner,” probably imitative of hurry, noise, and confusion (compare Middle Dutch rabbelen, Low German rabbeln “to chatter”). Meaning “tumultuous crowd of vulgar, noisy people” is from late 14c.; applied contemptuously to the common or low part of any populace from 1550s. (someone used the term and I realized I didn’t know its origin)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550594667 Timestamp) Propertarianism is calculable (possible by humans) but not computable (possible by machines) where calculation consist of transformation of inputs into outputs by means that are subjectively testable (unlimited), open to deduction, inference, and recursion, and computation is the transformation of inputs into outputs given the internal limits of comparison of the computational grammar.
-
Property Defined – for The 1000Th Time
PROPERTY – FOR THE 1000TH TIME February 21st, 2019 4:06 PM (Not going to repeat every single refutation here. If you encounter one where you think you ‘got me’ it won’t happen. sorry. Just ask how we handle it.) ; DEMAND FOR POSSESSION, PROPERTY, PROPERTY RIGHTS. 1) Cooperation provides disproportionate returns necessary for survival 2) Division of labor multiplies disproportionate returns on cooperation. 3) Reciprocity incentivizes cooperation. Cheating disincentivizes cooperation. 4) Humans engage in both retaliation, and altruistic (costly) punishment of cheaters in order to preserve the disproportionate returns on cooperation and cooperation at scale. 5) Morality consists of reciprocity within the local limits of proportionality. Man is amoral and acts in hist interests it is just nearly always in his better long term interests to act morally. 6) Law evolved to prevent retaliation cycles, to standardize means of conflict resolution, to maintain maximum returns for the majority of the polity, and to increase the revenues of taxing authorities. 7) Law uses a single measure: demonstrated investment which we call interests or ‘property’ to resolve conflicts and preserve the peace (returns on cooperation), and a single test: reciprocity. Ths law is called ‘tort’ or ‘natural law’. 8) Law evolves through the continuous evolutionary suppression of violations of reciprocity, through the continuous discovery of findings of law. It is a purely empirical process. 9) All social science can be expressed in terms of identification, acquisition, transformation, transfer, consumption, and loss of interests in property. 10) All human cognition can be expressed as reward system responses to that same identification, acquisition, transformation, transfer, consumption, and loss of interests in property. THEREFORE; Ergo PROPERTARIANISM consist of a universal language of linguistic, psychological, and social sciences that makes use of a standard of measure we commonly call property. WHEREAS; “Property” refers to: 1) MEASUREMENT: A category of measurements, within that category we call weights and measures, that provides commensurability and therefore decidability, over the use of all possible human interests, in matters of conflict over those interests, where those interests satisfy any demonstrated human demand. AND WHERE; Property consists in that series: 1) POSSESSION(IN FACT): That which I have acted to prevent others from consumption or use. 2) PROPERTY(NORMATIVE: That which you and I agree not to use or consume from one another. 3) PROPERTY RIGHTS(INSURED): that which a third party will insure we do not use or consume from one another. AND WHERE; Rights include no less than: 1) Constituo – Homesteading: Convert into property through bearing a cost of transformation. 2) Transitus – Transit: passage through 3d space. 3) Usus - Use: setting up a stall. 4) Fructus – Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits) 5) Mancipio – Emancipation: (sale, transfer) 6) Abusus – Abuse: (Consumption or Destruction) Opposite of Constituo. AND WHERE; Property includes any INTEREST we observe by: 1) DEFENSE: Men are willing to defend with violence 2) INVESTMENT: Have a demonstrable investment in 3) NON-IMPOSITION: Acquired that investment without imposing a cost on others. (via john Zebley) WHERE Interests are demonstrated by: EITHER … 0) Origination (Homesteading, “Constituo”) OR … 1) Productive (no blackmail etc) … 2) Fully informed (no asymmetric knowledge) … 3) Warrantied (responsible fo asymmetric knowledge) … 4) Voluntary transfer (non coercive) AND IN BOTH CASES, WHERE … 5) Such action is free of violation of the same by externality. (unharmful) AND WHERE; Man demonstrates interest and defends the following categories of his means of production: 1) MEANS OF PRODUCTION OF EXISTENCE Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.” – Physical Body – Actions and Time – Memories, Concepts and Identities: tools that enable us to plan and act. In the consumer economy this includes brands. – Knowledge ties (skills, crafts) – Several Property: Those things we claim a monopoly of control over. AND; 2) MEANS OF PRODUCTION OF REPRODUCTION Means of Reproduction: ârelationships with others and tools of relationships upon which we reciprocally depend.â – Mates (access to sex/reproduction) – Children (genetic reproduction) – Familial Relations (security) – Consanguineous Relations (tribal and family ties) – Racial property (racial ties) – Status and Class (reputation) AND; 3). MEANS OF PRIVATE PRODUCTION Relational Property – Non-Familial Relations (utility) – Organizational ties (work) Cooperative Property – Shares in property: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (claims for partial ownership) Artificial Property – Monopoly Property such as intellectual property. (grants of limited monopoly within a geography) – Trademarks and Brands (prohibitions on fraudulent transfers within a geography). AND; 4). MEANS OF COMMONS PRODUCTION (Community) Property
- Institutional Property: âThose objects into which we have invested our forgone opportunities, our efforts, or our material assets, in order to aggregate capital from multiple individuals for mutual gain.â
Informal (Normative) Institutions: Our norms: manners, ethics and morals. Informal institutional property is nearly impossible to quantify and price. The costs are subjective and consists of forgone opportunities.
Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion (including the secular religion), Government, Laws. Formal institutional property is easy to price. costs are visible. And the productivity of the social order is at least marginally measurable.
Territory and attendant resources.
—-END—
-
(FB 1550777839 Timestamp) PROPERTY IN TOTO IS DEAD SIMPLE
(FB 1550777839 Timestamp) PROPERTY IN TOTO IS DEAD SIMPLE
-
Property Defined – for The 1000Th Time
PROPERTY – FOR THE 1000TH TIME February 21st, 2019 4:06 PM (Not going to repeat every single refutation here. If you encounter one where you think you ‘got me’ it won’t happen. sorry. Just ask how we handle it.) ; DEMAND FOR POSSESSION, PROPERTY, PROPERTY RIGHTS. 1) Cooperation provides disproportionate returns necessary for survival 2) Division of labor multiplies disproportionate returns on cooperation. 3) Reciprocity incentivizes cooperation. Cheating disincentivizes cooperation. 4) Humans engage in both retaliation, and altruistic (costly) punishment of cheaters in order to preserve the disproportionate returns on cooperation and cooperation at scale. 5) Morality consists of reciprocity within the local limits of proportionality. Man is amoral and acts in hist interests it is just nearly always in his better long term interests to act morally. 6) Law evolved to prevent retaliation cycles, to standardize means of conflict resolution, to maintain maximum returns for the majority of the polity, and to increase the revenues of taxing authorities. 7) Law uses a single measure: demonstrated investment which we call interests or ‘property’ to resolve conflicts and preserve the peace (returns on cooperation), and a single test: reciprocity. Ths law is called ‘tort’ or ‘natural law’. 8) Law evolves through the continuous evolutionary suppression of violations of reciprocity, through the continuous discovery of findings of law. It is a purely empirical process. 9) All social science can be expressed in terms of identification, acquisition, transformation, transfer, consumption, and loss of interests in property. 10) All human cognition can be expressed as reward system responses to that same identification, acquisition, transformation, transfer, consumption, and loss of interests in property. THEREFORE; Ergo PROPERTARIANISM consist of a universal language of linguistic, psychological, and social sciences that makes use of a standard of measure we commonly call property. WHEREAS; “Property” refers to: 1) MEASUREMENT: A category of measurements, within that category we call weights and measures, that provides commensurability and therefore decidability, over the use of all possible human interests, in matters of conflict over those interests, where those interests satisfy any demonstrated human demand. AND WHERE; Property consists in that series: 1) POSSESSION(IN FACT): That which I have acted to prevent others from consumption or use. 2) PROPERTY(NORMATIVE: That which you and I agree not to use or consume from one another. 3) PROPERTY RIGHTS(INSURED): that which a third party will insure we do not use or consume from one another. AND WHERE; Rights include no less than: 1) Constituo – Homesteading: Convert into property through bearing a cost of transformation. 2) Transitus – Transit: passage through 3d space. 3) Usus - Use: setting up a stall. 4) Fructus – Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits) 5) Mancipio – Emancipation: (sale, transfer) 6) Abusus – Abuse: (Consumption or Destruction) Opposite of Constituo. AND WHERE; Property includes any INTEREST we observe by: 1) DEFENSE: Men are willing to defend with violence 2) INVESTMENT: Have a demonstrable investment in 3) NON-IMPOSITION: Acquired that investment without imposing a cost on others. (via john Zebley) WHERE Interests are demonstrated by: EITHER … 0) Origination (Homesteading, “Constituo”) OR … 1) Productive (no blackmail etc) … 2) Fully informed (no asymmetric knowledge) … 3) Warrantied (responsible fo asymmetric knowledge) … 4) Voluntary transfer (non coercive) AND IN BOTH CASES, WHERE … 5) Such action is free of violation of the same by externality. (unharmful) AND WHERE; Man demonstrates interest and defends the following categories of his means of production: 1) MEANS OF PRODUCTION OF EXISTENCE Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.” – Physical Body – Actions and Time – Memories, Concepts and Identities: tools that enable us to plan and act. In the consumer economy this includes brands. – Knowledge ties (skills, crafts) – Several Property: Those things we claim a monopoly of control over. AND; 2) MEANS OF PRODUCTION OF REPRODUCTION Means of Reproduction: ârelationships with others and tools of relationships upon which we reciprocally depend.â – Mates (access to sex/reproduction) – Children (genetic reproduction) – Familial Relations (security) – Consanguineous Relations (tribal and family ties) – Racial property (racial ties) – Status and Class (reputation) AND; 3). MEANS OF PRIVATE PRODUCTION Relational Property – Non-Familial Relations (utility) – Organizational ties (work) Cooperative Property – Shares in property: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (claims for partial ownership) Artificial Property – Monopoly Property such as intellectual property. (grants of limited monopoly within a geography) – Trademarks and Brands (prohibitions on fraudulent transfers within a geography). AND; 4). MEANS OF COMMONS PRODUCTION (Community) Property
- Institutional Property: âThose objects into which we have invested our forgone opportunities, our efforts, or our material assets, in order to aggregate capital from multiple individuals for mutual gain.â
Informal (Normative) Institutions: Our norms: manners, ethics and morals. Informal institutional property is nearly impossible to quantify and price. The costs are subjective and consists of forgone opportunities.
Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion (including the secular religion), Government, Laws. Formal institutional property is easy to price. costs are visible. And the productivity of the social order is at least marginally measurable.
Territory and attendant resources.
—-END—
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550928169 Timestamp) RULE(LAW) VS GOVERNMENT (COMMONS) —“Is it ancap? I searched it it looked like some minarchy stuff.”–Mick Seppala It’s strictly constructed rule of law by test of reciprocity – major difference is you can’t ‘lie’ in political speech – which is the hard problem of converting from free speech to free truthful speech. And … You ‘roll your own’ government with it. I recommend various forms of government for various people. but only one rule of law. P is not ideology, philosophy, or religion. It is LAW.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550907247 Timestamp) “WHAT DOES GSRM (or GSRRM, or RRGSM ) STAND FOR?” (core) —“You mention GSRM all the time, what does it stand for?”– The Female (herd) competitive strategy by circumventing argument by undermining, poisoning the well, and reputation destruction by use of (G)ossiping (S)haming, (R)allying, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, and solving for face or consent — Versus the Male (pack) strategy by factual argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent. In other words female “feels” of approval or rejection vs male “reals” of truth of falsehood. Men generally make an argument and let the argument do it work. We bear the shame ourselves. We use shaming if necessary in response to GSRM. Whereas the feminine cognitive strategy is to rely entirely on GSRM as a means of denying or suppressing the argument rather than refuting it. In western history GSRM was largely illegal or punishable by direct violence between men. And laws against “scolds” -women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace. During the democratic and marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony). Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM. GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience. This is why the abrahamic (jewish in particular, or semitic in general) means of countering greco-roman-european argument by using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism), and critique (undermining) is so effective: it is how our females talk to us, and because of our high trust, we are either genetically or culturally vulnerable to it – where other lower trust people are not. And we are easily undermined politically and academically because our females naturally find greater ‘affinity’ with semitic non-argument (religion, postmodernism, feminism, denialism) than with european reason science truth testimony. Male European – Truth over Face, Regardless of cost. Male everywhere else – some degree of face over truth. Female everywhere – nearly universal face over truth. Yet it is truth over face that is the reason for the ‘western miracle’ – why the rest is so different from the rest. Hence why christians are the vulnerability of western civilization: their religion was developed to obtain the attention of women, and to appeal to GSRM. The religion is stated and argued with false promise(‘salvation’), baiting into hazard (cultural vulnerability to conquest), using pilpul (excuse making) and critique (straw manning), and the fictionalism of supernaturalism. Judaism to undermine, Christanity to weaken, and islam to destroy. The middle east uses the female reproductive strategy and the far east and far west use the male, with the far east using face over truth to defend hierarchy and the west using truth before face to defend the market of the peerage. And the middle east today just as in the age of the greeks, just lying and shaming all truth without end. The world is not complicated. It is our lies that make it seem so. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute