index(name) > icon(representation) > symbol(abstraction)
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-14 13:00:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1117412373306933248
Form: Definition
-
1) True = A claim by the actor, of the internal consistency of the argument, use
1) True = A claim by the actor, of the internal consistency of the argument, used to construct a statement, in that grammar we call mathematics, that consists of operations upon, and deductions from, the single constant relation of positional names.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-10 15:09:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115995183043182593
Reply addressees: @KelseyAHE
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115646922243629057
IN REPLY TO:
@kelseyahe
Do you think mathematicians disagree about what’s true?
When? Where? Why?Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115646922243629057
-
There is only one natural law of cooperation: Productive, Fully Informed, Volunt
There is only one natural law of cooperation: Productive, Fully Informed, Voluntary, Exchange – free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated investments of others. That’s it. This free trade is just another example of Ghetto Ethics in Natural Law guise.
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-09 21:15:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115724910926663681
Reply addressees: @mikerosenwald @tylercowen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115640295134257152
IN REPLY TO:
@mikerosenwald
My friend @tylercowen new book is out today. It is an all-in defense of American capitalism. Even if you disagree with him, you should read it because a) intellectual bubbles suck and b) to see an extraordinary mind at work. https://t.co/7IgvkfbLX6
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1115640295134257152
-
Dialectic: Philosophical Rationalism (agreement) Prosecution: Science and law (s
Dialectic: Philosophical Rationalism (agreement)
Prosecution: Science and law (survival)
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-04 19:17:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1113883310889902080
-
“Please define agency or direct me to where you have done so previously, please.
—“Please define agency or direct me to where you have done so previously, please. Thank you.”—
DEFINITION OF AGENCY
https://propertarianism.com/?s=definition+agency
WHY
https://propertarianism.com/2018/05/01/the-semantics-of-agency/
Source date (UTC): 2019-04-01 12:09:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1112688521268084736
-
Literacy
November 6th, 2018 8:55 AM “Literacy: means ‘capable of reading and writing’. Being “Illiterate’ means incapable of reading and writing. Being “Literate” means ‘Well Read’ OR ‘he can read and write’. This is another one of those terms where we need a demarcation to prevent conflation. illiterate “can’t read” > literate – “can read” > “literate – well read”.
-
Literacy
November 6th, 2018 8:55 AM “Literacy: means ‘capable of reading and writing’. Being “Illiterate’ means incapable of reading and writing. Being “Literate” means ‘Well Read’ OR ‘he can read and write’. This is another one of those terms where we need a demarcation to prevent conflation. illiterate “can’t read” > literate – “can read” > “literate – well read”.
-
(FB 1541541541 Timestamp) OPERATIONALIZE MEANS ANTI-IDEALIZE
(FB 1541541541 Timestamp) OPERATIONALIZE MEANS ANTI-IDEALIZE
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542209140 Timestamp) LESSON: Virtue Signalling vs Counter-Signalling VIRTUE SIGNALING <- Description –> COUNTER-SIGNALING (about what I say)…………………………….(about what you say) COUNTER SIGNALING as a cover for COWARDICE is the opposite of VIRTUE SIGNALING as a cover for COST AVOIDANCE
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542209140 Timestamp) LESSON: Virtue Signalling vs Counter-Signalling VIRTUE SIGNALING <- Description –> COUNTER-SIGNALING (about what I say)…………………………….(about what you say) COUNTER SIGNALING as a cover for COWARDICE is the opposite of VIRTUE SIGNALING as a cover for COST AVOIDANCE