EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION CONSISTS IN
European Civilization Consists in: The Indo European language, Heroic, Militaristic, Expansionist, Paternalistic, Sky Worshipping, Metalworking,… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=499631430633752&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-04 17:11:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191402610550554624
WHAT DEFINES ‘EUROPEAN’?
The IE peoples were a mixture of west Eurasians surviving the ice age.
The neolithic ended with the proto groups of no less than the Europeans (west), finnics… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=499602750636620&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-04 16:16:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1191388756563124224
CONSERVATIVE means *evidentiary* with warranty in pursuit of capitalization, in exchange for eugenics: The Masculine.
PROGRESSIVE means *promissory* without warranty, in pursuit of consumption and dysgenics: The Feminine.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 14:10:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190632191132422145
[A]ll grammars perform the same function, providing a scope(dimensions) of permissible vocabulary, a set of comparison operators; and a grammar and syntax of continuous recursive disambiguation, all of which rely upon identity, similarity, and differences in constant relations, the simplest we know of which is arithmetic (positional names), and the next simplest of which are the first order logics, but all such grammars are simply variations on the human language facility: the use of a grammar, operators (vocabulary), and references(vocabulary) to produce transactions we call meaning.
[A]ll grammars perform the same function, providing a scope(dimensions) of permissible vocabulary, a set of comparison operators; and a grammar and syntax of continuous recursive disambiguation, all of which rely upon identity, similarity, and differences in constant relations, the simplest we know of which is arithmetic (positional names), and the next simplest of which are the first order logics, but all such grammars are simply variations on the human language facility: the use of a grammar, operators (vocabulary), and references(vocabulary) to produce transactions we call meaning.
—“You often say “bait into hazard”, any chance you could explain that in more depth? I don’t really get what you mean. Are you talking about moral hazard in economics? And what’s the baiting?”—
If I suggest you might win at gambling (you can’t), that’s baiting you into hazard. If I entice you into buying drugs, i’m baiting you in to a hazard, since addiction is a spiral. If I offer you a loan to get what you want under impulse or duress, but I can extract interest from you, and then seize your property in restitution. If I promise you equality or socialism when it’s genetics that cause our differences, and you act to destroy your civilization, then that’s all baiting into hazard. if I promise you salvation in heaven if you rebel against the government that is trying to create order and prosperity over the next few decades, that is baiting you into a hazard. In other words, you are entering into a voluntary exchange that is not in your interests, simply because for whatever reason you are vulnerable to the trap.
—“You often say “bait into hazard”, any chance you could explain that in more depth? I don’t really get what you mean. Are you talking about moral hazard in economics? And what’s the baiting?”—
If I suggest you might win at gambling (you can’t), that’s baiting you into hazard. If I entice you into buying drugs, i’m baiting you in to a hazard, since addiction is a spiral. If I offer you a loan to get what you want under impulse or duress, but I can extract interest from you, and then seize your property in restitution. If I promise you equality or socialism when it’s genetics that cause our differences, and you act to destroy your civilization, then that’s all baiting into hazard. if I promise you salvation in heaven if you rebel against the government that is trying to create order and prosperity over the next few decades, that is baiting you into a hazard. In other words, you are entering into a voluntary exchange that is not in your interests, simply because for whatever reason you are vulnerable to the trap.
Rule of law = Sovereignty, Property(Demonstrated Interest), Reciprocity, Court,Testimony, Jury, Resulting in markets.
Socialism = Borrowing by the state, to make investments by the state, in industries producible by the state, and the redistribution of earnings into the commons.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 19:35:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190351589724295174
Reply addressees: @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190341793847619584
IN REPLY TO:
@viralstrikeai
@whysuspectus @AndrewYang @curtdoolittle comments.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190341793847619584
WHAT DOES “BAIT INTO HAZARD” MEAN?
—“You often say “bait into hazard”, any chance you could explain that in more depth? I don’t really get what you mean
Are you talking about moral hazard in economics? And what’s the baiting?”—
If I suggest you might win at gambling (you can’t), that’s baiting you into hazard. If I entice you into buying drugs, i’m baiting you in to a hazard, since addiction is a spiral.
If I offer you a loan to get what you want under impulse or duress, but I can extract interest from you, and then seize your property in restitution.
If I promise you equality or socialism when it’s genetics that cause our differences, and you act to destroy your civilization, then that’s all baiting into hazard.
if I promise you salvation in heaven if you rebel against the government that is trying to create order and prosperity over the next few decades, that is baiting you into a hazard.
In other words, you are entering into a voluntary exchange that is not in your interests, simply because for whatever reason you are vulnerable to the trap.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 18:42:00 UTC
DEFINING SOCIALISM FOR YANG
—“Journalists who come to Des Moines tomorrow with an open mind will have those minds blown. #Yangapalooza
secure the center secure the future”—@AndrewYang
—“Its not socialist to tax big tech companies and give everyone a $1,00 a month. Everyone gets it, its pay for with technology. Its not socialist!”— @ironpatriot2016
—“Curt?”—
Rule of law = Sovereignty, Property(Demonstrated Interest), Reciprocity, Court,Testimony, Jury, Resulting in markets.
Socialism = Borrowing by the state, to make investments by the state, in industries producible by the state, and the redistribution of earnings into the commons.
Authoritarianism = Borrowing by individuals, Investment by individuals, in industries producible by individuals, producing returns for individuals, that is appropriated (stolen) by the state, and redistributed to non-borrowers, investors, producers.
The principle means by which jews,christians,muslims, in the old world, and marxists, postmodernists, and feminists in the modern world, is to use words people don’t comprehend in operational terms, to conduct false promises by sophisms that do little but bait fools into hazard.
Unfortunately there are a lot of fools to bait into hazard.
Unfortunately we let them vote into a single house of representatives, creating rule by majority-of-fools best deceived by false promise.
When if we had created houses for commoners, and women we could debate and trade.
I would happily debate Andrew because I am not aware of anyone else living who understands issues of modernity as well as I do. Because some of his desire can be produced by moral rather than immoral means. But really, he’s not very smart he just says ‘free stuff!’ for attention.
And fools come for the bait.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 15:48:00 UTC