Curt Doolittle

Form: Definition

  • WHAT IS “WHITENESS”? It’s adherence to and preservations of, and insurance of, t

    WHAT IS “WHITENESS”?
    It’s adherence to and preservations of, and insurance of, the institutions of the west that instill and demand the maximization of responsibility for private and common, with duty, truth, excellence, beauty, meritocracy, and sortition by those properties: the natural law of mutual insurance of self determination by self determined means, by test of sovereignty in demonstrated interests and reciprocity in display word and deed, limiting us to truthful reciprocal moral markets in association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, and war.

    It’s the group evolutionary strategy of the European people. It’s the optimum evolutionary strategy producing the optimum conditions of life that is possible by man.

    Yet like the tree of liberty it must be fertilized with the production of force to defend it from those who would avoid that responsibility at the cost of their fellows.

    Cheers

    CurtD

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-06 13:50:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776608419006365696

  • WHAT DOES SCIENCE MEAN AFTER ALL? Yes, tho wolfgang smith makes a common error o

    WHAT DOES SCIENCE MEAN AFTER ALL?
    Yes, tho wolfgang smith makes a common error of criticizing science that is common to both the theological and philosophical:
    Science is just legal testimony to the evidence from our ancient law applied outside of the courtroom.
    To claim what is testifiable is simply to seek the truth of cause and consequence independent of subjective experience of the individual(s)- thereby providing decidability in matters of agreement, disagreement or conflict across people of different subjective experiences.
    As such, to say science falsifies claims of the testifiability of subjective experience as true, is not the same as saying subjective experience does not exist, nor that it has no influence over us, or meaning to us.

    Reply addressees: @waynelforBernie

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-06 02:24:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776435778169524224

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776433619155759316

  • MISCEGENATION AND ANTI-MISCEGENATION LAWS IN THE USA —“Anti-miscegenation laws

    MISCEGENATION AND ANTI-MISCEGENATION LAWS IN THE USA
    —“Anti-miscegenation laws are laws that enforce racial segregation at the level of marriage and intimate relationships by criminalizing interracial marriage and sometimes, they also criminalize sex between members of different races.

    In the United States, various state laws prohibited marriages between whites and blacks, and in many states, they also prohibited marriages between whites and Native Americans as well as marriages between whites and Asians. In the U.S., such laws were known as anti-miscegenation laws. From 1913 until 1948, 30 out of the then 48 states enforced such laws

    Miscegenation (/mɪˌsɛdʒəˈneɪʃən/ mih-SEJ-ə-NAY-shən) is marriage or admixture between people who are considered to be members of different races. The word, now usually considered pejorative, is derived from a combination of the Latin terms miscere (‘to mix’) and genus (‘race’ or ‘kind’).

    The word was coined in an anonymous propaganda pamphlet published in New York City in December 1863, during the American Civil War. The pamphlet was entitled Miscegenation: The Theory of the Blending of the Races, Applied to the American White Man and Negro.

    Before the publication of Miscegenation, the words racial intermixing and amalgamation were used as general terms for ethnic and racial genetic mixing.

    The pamphlet was a hoax, concocted by Democrats to discredit the Republicans by imputing to them what were then radical views that would offend the vast majority of whites, even those who opposed slavery.

    In the United States, interracial marriage, cohabitation and sex have been termed “miscegenation” since the term was coined in 1863.

    After the Second World War, an increasing number of states repealed their anti-miscegenation laws. In 1967, in the landmark case Loving v. Virginia, the remaining anti-miscegenation laws were ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren”— From multiple Wiki Articles

    (FYI: You must share to comment. Self protection of my feed. Thanks.)

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 21:57:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776368578981220352

  • FWIW: Bias is a tendency, inclination, or prejudice toward or against something

    FWIW: Bias is a tendency, inclination, or prejudice toward or against something providing terms of decidability in a context. Thats all. All four are biases because there are alternative biases not demonstrated, but frequently demonstrated by others. A postmodernist might conflate preference with bias but that would conflate the good with he true – which is a cognitively feminine and as such left wing cognitive bias thats always false in questions of truth.

    Reply addressees: @CherryCreekDez @whatifalthist @done_with_fish

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-04 02:14:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775708563924504576

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775703958696149025

  • The proper saying is indeed “Hear, hear!” and not “Here, here!” “Hear, hear!” is

    The proper saying is indeed “Hear, hear!” and not “Here, here!”

    “Hear, hear!” is an expression used to show agreement with a statement made by a speaker, essentially short for “Hear him/her!” It is often used in formal settings, such as in parliament or at public speeches, to indicate approval or support for the point being made.

    The phrase originated in the British Parliament, where it was used as a shortened form of “Hear ye, hear ye,” which was a call for attention or a command to listen.

    In contrast, “Here, here!” is a common misinterpretation or misspelling of the original phrase, likely due to the similar pronunciation of “hear” and “here.” While it’s a common mistake, “Here, here!” does not carry the same meaning as the original expression.

    Reply addressees: @DRolandAnderson @Heimdallralfadr

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-03 15:45:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775550273013817345

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775549134122201248

  • The difference between truth and wisdom. it’s a matter of (a) precision vs gener

    The difference between truth and wisdom. it’s a matter of (a) precision vs generalization and (b) action vs experience, (c) true vs good. The only conflict arises with fundamentalism from both directions. Denying the wisdom of religion and the truth of science.

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-01 14:07:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774800677165732093

    Reply addressees: @PhysInHistory

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774644991068905536

  • THE COMPOSITION OF INNOCENCE Innocence contains four dimensions: 1 – The presump

    THE COMPOSITION OF INNOCENCE
    Innocence contains four dimensions:
    1 – The presumption of innate goodness (false) and instead the training of the child in manners ethics and morals as if the child possessed such innate goodness.
    2 – The ignorance of and insulation from natural human behavioral evils (harming others) and temptations (harming the self), and others baiting one into hazards (harming the self and/or others).
    3 – The expression of safety, confidence, curiosity and and wonder for having that via positiva training and via negativa insulation.
    4 – Until the personality insulated, trained, and expressed as optimism is maintained and self defended by the neurological development of agency and self-regulation – an then, as a member of the group, the regulation of others.

    Cheers.

    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-30 13:10:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774061729221058561

  • Hmm… it’s an idiom “calling a deer a horse” meaning “deliberate peddling of a

    Hmm… it’s an idiom “calling a deer a horse” meaning “deliberate peddling of a falsehood”. The english equivalent is uncommon but far less poetic: “calling black white.” The english is a very literal or analytic expression just as the chinese is a very literary or poetic expression. Typical of both cultures. So there is more ‘meaning’ in the chinese (literary, poetic) version. A great example of chinese low precision high context, vs english low context high precision language.

    Reply addressees: @SaitouHajime00 @whatifalthist

    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-30 04:05:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1773924499097886720

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1773921843805864175

  • I usually add a third dimension: 1 – matter (material) 2 – form (organization) 3

    I usually add a third dimension:
    1 – matter (material)
    2 – form (organization)
    3 – ownership (responsibility)

    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-30 03:32:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1773916180019073370

    Reply addressees: @xphilosopher @SteveStuWill

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1773707812113158531

  • NATIONALISM vs CIVIC NATIONALISM vs ETHNO-NATIONALISM The terms “nationalism,” “

    NATIONALISM vs CIVIC NATIONALISM vs ETHNO-NATIONALISM
    The terms “nationalism,” “civic nationalism,” and “ethno-nationalism” encompass different concepts related to how nations and national identity are constructed and perceived. Each of these forms of nationalism prioritizes… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1773554779697934364

    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-29 16:56:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1773756062778167759