Apr 16, 2020, 2:20 AM
—“Curt: What do you mean by “cellular damage”?”—Daniel Roland Anderson
XX vs XY. Two chances of cellular correction vs one. This is why men live shorter lives by about ten percent. We accumulate cellular damage and we take on the high risk work in the world. When childbirth was risky the tradeoff existed. Now it doesn’t.
Apr 16, 2020, 2:20 AM
—“Curt: What do you mean by “cellular damage”?”—Daniel Roland Anderson
XX vs XY. Two chances of cellular correction vs one. This is why men live shorter lives by about ten percent. We accumulate cellular damage and we take on the high risk work in the world. When childbirth was risky the tradeoff existed. Now it doesn’t.
Conspiracy of Common Interests vs Of Intent —“Maybe I’m unclear on what you mean by intent. It seems to me incentives and intent are interlinked.”—Scott Strong CONSPIRACY OF COMMON INTERESTS: Passively follow incentives to seize existing opportunity – and fail to not seize opportunity that is immoral. CONSPIRACY OF INTENT: Actively work to create opportunities to seize because they are immoral. CONSPIRACY OF IDIOCY: Actively work to crate opportunities to seize that are immoral because you falsely believe that they are moral (you justify them) CONSPIRACY TO BAIT INTO HAZARD: Actively work to create opportunities for others to seize that produce immoral consequences.
Conspiracy of Common Interests vs Of Intent —“Maybe I’m unclear on what you mean by intent. It seems to me incentives and intent are interlinked.”—Scott Strong CONSPIRACY OF COMMON INTERESTS: Passively follow incentives to seize existing opportunity – and fail to not seize opportunity that is immoral. CONSPIRACY OF INTENT: Actively work to create opportunities to seize because they are immoral. CONSPIRACY OF IDIOCY: Actively work to crate opportunities to seize that are immoral because you falsely believe that they are moral (you justify them) CONSPIRACY TO BAIT INTO HAZARD: Actively work to create opportunities for others to seize that produce immoral consequences.
Apr 16, 2020, 10:32 PM Define how you use the term socialism. I’m assuming you mean european socialism (french-german) not jewish socialism (jewish russian). Socialism means state control of the means of production. Mixed economy means using the borrowing power of the state to strategically finance what the private sector cannot or will not. My opinion is the same as most major economists – that the state does not capture the proceeds of those investments and return them to the common people. My opinion is that we should finance repatriation of all non-trivial industry AND automate the heck out of it, and that the state should take non-voting interest in these companies and demand dividends as income for the people. My opinion is that the financial sector is predatory and that consumer credit should be purely statistical and direct from the treasury eliminating all rent seeking from the financial sector. My opinion is that liquidity necessary to generate demand should not be distributed to the financial sector for credit multipliers, but as cash distribution directly to citizens that business and finance compete for. My opinion is that education is largely wasted income other than the high end stem fields, and that all other schooling takes one year to two years non-resident at most. My opinion is that teaching and research staffs should be separate corporations with separate controls, and that phd and research programs should be well funded and largely state funded. My opinion is that the military used to fund basic research, and that presently, basic research must be faked under medical or non-military, when in general the state should treat investment in research as a venture capitalists, seeking returns for the polity in longer time horizons than other peoples. My opinion is that the best education in the world should be offered to all citizens from the best educators in the world, and that this should be a continuous process, and it should cost almost nothing (200 per course or something) My opinion is that if universities admit students that if the student doesn’t compete two years or transfer the university eats the money. And that the university carries the loan entirely, even if the loan is borrow by the university from the government. My opinion is that if we did this we’d be back to one income households just fine. Edit
Apr 16, 2020, 10:32 PM Define how you use the term socialism. I’m assuming you mean european socialism (french-german) not jewish socialism (jewish russian). Socialism means state control of the means of production. Mixed economy means using the borrowing power of the state to strategically finance what the private sector cannot or will not. My opinion is the same as most major economists – that the state does not capture the proceeds of those investments and return them to the common people. My opinion is that we should finance repatriation of all non-trivial industry AND automate the heck out of it, and that the state should take non-voting interest in these companies and demand dividends as income for the people. My opinion is that the financial sector is predatory and that consumer credit should be purely statistical and direct from the treasury eliminating all rent seeking from the financial sector. My opinion is that liquidity necessary to generate demand should not be distributed to the financial sector for credit multipliers, but as cash distribution directly to citizens that business and finance compete for. My opinion is that education is largely wasted income other than the high end stem fields, and that all other schooling takes one year to two years non-resident at most. My opinion is that teaching and research staffs should be separate corporations with separate controls, and that phd and research programs should be well funded and largely state funded. My opinion is that the military used to fund basic research, and that presently, basic research must be faked under medical or non-military, when in general the state should treat investment in research as a venture capitalists, seeking returns for the polity in longer time horizons than other peoples. My opinion is that the best education in the world should be offered to all citizens from the best educators in the world, and that this should be a continuous process, and it should cost almost nothing (200 per course or something) My opinion is that if universities admit students that if the student doesn’t compete two years or transfer the university eats the money. And that the university carries the loan entirely, even if the loan is borrow by the university from the government. My opinion is that if we did this we’d be back to one income households just fine. Edit
Apr 24, 2020, 12:21 PM The term “Note(s)” (debt instrument), like “Money” (medium of exchange), and “Currency” (“in circulation”) has been abused. Technically, money proper must consist of commodity money. All else is a commodity money substitute: – Scrip ( currency substitute that replaces legal tender. a form of credit and documentation of debt)> – Token-prepaid-money-substitute (bitcoin: divisible tokens) > – Cheque-non-transferrable-claim-on-account > – Note-transferrable-claim-on-account > – Banknote-claim-on-deposits > – Share-in-the-corporation-assets > – Fiat-Share-in-the-economy : Fiat Money (What we all use today) The rest are various financial instruments that are less liquid.
Apr 24, 2020, 12:21 PM The term “Note(s)” (debt instrument), like “Money” (medium of exchange), and “Currency” (“in circulation”) has been abused. Technically, money proper must consist of commodity money. All else is a commodity money substitute: – Scrip ( currency substitute that replaces legal tender. a form of credit and documentation of debt)> – Token-prepaid-money-substitute (bitcoin: divisible tokens) > – Cheque-non-transferrable-claim-on-account > – Note-transferrable-claim-on-account > – Banknote-claim-on-deposits > – Share-in-the-corporation-assets > – Fiat-Share-in-the-economy : Fiat Money (What we all use today) The rest are various financial instruments that are less liquid.
I see lot of confusion by not separating “P” (the method) from various applications of the P-method. P-Method isn’t like libertarianism, or socialism, or some other political model. By applying P-Method we are trying to reform and restore our civilization. Method vs Application. Science vs Technology, Baking vs Cookies. THE METHODOLOGY 1 – P-Metaphysics (realism, naturalism, operationalism, ….) 2 – P-Epistemology (brain, mind, consciousness, learning, epistemology, acquisition) 3 – P-Method (a method, the completion of the scientific method in a formal operational logic) of testing reciprocity in display word and deed. … a) Disambiguation, serialization, competition (supply demand equilibration, evolution) … b) The Grammars and Table of Grammars … c) The Operational Grammar and Universal Commensurability … … c’) The Specification for Man … d) Reciprocity in Display word and Deed … … d’) The set of definitions in series that result from disambiguating terms of reciprocity. … e) Compatibilism (division of perception, cognition, knowledge and labor) … f) Ternaryism, Tri-Coeercion – Tri-Functionalism … g) Beckerian explanation of social phenomenon using economic analysis APPLIED GENERALLY 4 – P-Method applied to History and Group Strategies 5 – P-Method as an explanation for the strategy and success of western civilization. 6 – P-Law, and Government (applied P to creating governments) and APPLIED SPECIFICALLY 7 – P-New-Constitution for restoration of western civilization. 8 – P-Constitutions for various other civilizations. Which thing are you talking about? If it’s political it’s 7 or 8. Newbies talk about 7-8 all the time. That’s not P. That’s APPLIED-P. P method is the formal logic of psychological and social science, if not all science. P method combines all the philosophical and scientific categories. So when you confuse confuse P-method(explanation) with political preferences (application) it’s the same as confusing science(explanation) with technology(application)
I see lot of confusion by not separating “P” (the method) from various applications of the P-method. P-Method isn’t like libertarianism, or socialism, or some other political model. By applying P-Method we are trying to reform and restore our civilization. Method vs Application. Science vs Technology, Baking vs Cookies. THE METHODOLOGY 1 – P-Metaphysics (realism, naturalism, operationalism, ….) 2 – P-Epistemology (brain, mind, consciousness, learning, epistemology, acquisition) 3 – P-Method (a method, the completion of the scientific method in a formal operational logic) of testing reciprocity in display word and deed. … a) Disambiguation, serialization, competition (supply demand equilibration, evolution) … b) The Grammars and Table of Grammars … c) The Operational Grammar and Universal Commensurability … … c’) The Specification for Man … d) Reciprocity in Display word and Deed … … d’) The set of definitions in series that result from disambiguating terms of reciprocity. … e) Compatibilism (division of perception, cognition, knowledge and labor) … f) Ternaryism, Tri-Coeercion – Tri-Functionalism … g) Beckerian explanation of social phenomenon using economic analysis APPLIED GENERALLY 4 – P-Method applied to History and Group Strategies 5 – P-Method as an explanation for the strategy and success of western civilization. 6 – P-Law, and Government (applied P to creating governments) and APPLIED SPECIFICALLY 7 – P-New-Constitution for restoration of western civilization. 8 – P-Constitutions for various other civilizations. Which thing are you talking about? If it’s political it’s 7 or 8. Newbies talk about 7-8 all the time. That’s not P. That’s APPLIED-P. P method is the formal logic of psychological and social science, if not all science. P method combines all the philosophical and scientific categories. So when you confuse confuse P-method(explanation) with political preferences (application) it’s the same as confusing science(explanation) with technology(application)