Actually no: Nouns formed from prepositional verbs. But thank you for your attempted service to the common good.
Truth-before-face (testimony): truth regardless of cost to the status hierarchy
Face-before-truth (appeasement): falsehood in defense of the status hierarchy
Reply addressees: @DexterBall1968 @Indabank @DanishPastry11 @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump
Form: Definition
-
Actually no: Nouns formed from prepositional verbs. But thank you for your attem
-
“Curt, Please Define Mindfulness?”
“CURT, PLEASE DEFINE MINDFULNESS?”
—“What do you mean when you use the word “mindfulness”?”— Andrew Cordeaux @AndrewCordeaux
1) I mean the physical, cognitive and emotional discipline to control the subject of attention on the present intent, insulated from distractions whether personal, environmental, or interpersonal. 2) But with preference for the stoic method (self authoring, virtues of action), the epicurean objective (within one’s control), testimonial (scientific) knowledge, the play (ritual), and team sport, festival, and feast (celebration). 3) The buddhist method, originally practical and insular evolved into semi-mystical, and survived the attack by monotheistic abrahamism, where the western schools that were practical and action oriented, were destroyed by design by the Abrahamic conquest and dark age. 4) East asian ritual, and Hindu ‘way of life’ survived as well. Each of these methods of physical, mental and emotional discipline reflects local demand given local degree of agency during the period of transformation. (although buddhism was imposed on japan unfortunately). 5) So I use ‘mindfulness’ in the sense that all groups sought to meet demands for some technique of achieving mindfulness of their eras by slightly different means. Since buddhism developed the most direct analysis of the objective, the terminology evolved into a universal. 6) But as in all things, the stoic method, epicurean objective, and scientific(empirical) paradigm, and pursuit of agency(dominance) rather than withdrawal (submission), reflect the european rather than african, semitic, hindu, east asian metaphysics: realism, naturalism, agency.
-
“Curt, Please Define Mindfulness?”
“CURT, PLEASE DEFINE MINDFULNESS?”
—“What do you mean when you use the word “mindfulness”?”— Andrew Cordeaux @AndrewCordeaux
1) I mean the physical, cognitive and emotional discipline to control the subject of attention on the present intent, insulated from distractions whether personal, environmental, or interpersonal. 2) But with preference for the stoic method (self authoring, virtues of action), the epicurean objective (within one’s control), testimonial (scientific) knowledge, the play (ritual), and team sport, festival, and feast (celebration). 3) The buddhist method, originally practical and insular evolved into semi-mystical, and survived the attack by monotheistic abrahamism, where the western schools that were practical and action oriented, were destroyed by design by the Abrahamic conquest and dark age. 4) East asian ritual, and Hindu ‘way of life’ survived as well. Each of these methods of physical, mental and emotional discipline reflects local demand given local degree of agency during the period of transformation. (although buddhism was imposed on japan unfortunately). 5) So I use ‘mindfulness’ in the sense that all groups sought to meet demands for some technique of achieving mindfulness of their eras by slightly different means. Since buddhism developed the most direct analysis of the objective, the terminology evolved into a universal. 6) But as in all things, the stoic method, epicurean objective, and scientific(empirical) paradigm, and pursuit of agency(dominance) rather than withdrawal (submission), reflect the european rather than african, semitic, hindu, east asian metaphysics: realism, naturalism, agency.
-
P: We Operationalize the Series (statement) Not the Elements (evidence)
P: We Operationalize the Series (statement) Not the Elements (evidence) https://t.co/jSEyrdBsRv
-
What Do People Mean by Trust in Their Government
WHAT DO PEOPLE MEAN BY TRUST IN THEIR GOVERNMENT In the political context, when people are expressing in their government, it only refers to three factors (a) the framing of the debate by the media, academy, state complex, (b) the orderliness or at least comprehensibility of the patterns of speech and (c) the current levels of anxiety for the future. In other words, the academy, state, media, create demand by generation of conflict, just as diversity of race, ethnicity, and class generates conflict, just as ideological competition creates conflict. The state generates conflcit for ATTENTION which gets them POWER. Trust is a synonym for predictability over time.
-
What Do People Mean by Trust in Their Government
WHAT DO PEOPLE MEAN BY TRUST IN THEIR GOVERNMENT In the political context, when people are expressing in their government, it only refers to three factors (a) the framing of the debate by the media, academy, state complex, (b) the orderliness or at least comprehensibility of the patterns of speech and (c) the current levels of anxiety for the future. In other words, the academy, state, media, create demand by generation of conflict, just as diversity of race, ethnicity, and class generates conflict, just as ideological competition creates conflict. The state generates conflcit for ATTENTION which gets them POWER. Trust is a synonym for predictability over time.
-
Monarchy = Private Property State
Monarchy = Private Property State https://t.co/r7E6xbFB2B
-
Monarchy = Private Property State
Monarchy = Private Property State https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/monarchy-private-property-state/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 18:52:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267529528668303361
-
Children Are Not Private Property:
Oct 22, 2019, 2:44 PM CHILDREN ARE NOT PRIVATE PROPERTY: PARENTS HAVE A DEMONSTRATED INTEREST, AND ARE AGENTS INSURING BOTH CHILD AND THE POLITY
—“[“The children are not property but the insurer of the children, and the polity from the children like any other domesticated animal”] What did you mean by this?”—
That the parent insures the children from others (and nature) and insures the people from the children. The same is true for any domesticated animal. This is a ‘formal’ description of parental responsibility.
-
Children Are Not Private Property:
Oct 22, 2019, 2:44 PM CHILDREN ARE NOT PRIVATE PROPERTY: PARENTS HAVE A DEMONSTRATED INTEREST, AND ARE AGENTS INSURING BOTH CHILD AND THE POLITY
—“[“The children are not property but the insurer of the children, and the polity from the children like any other domesticated animal”] What did you mean by this?”—
That the parent insures the children from others (and nature) and insures the people from the children. The same is true for any domesticated animal. This is a ‘formal’ description of parental responsibility.