Curt Doolittle

Form: Definition

  • What is P-law?

    1. Given Self-Determination by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Adversarialism, that maximizes the rate of adaptability with maximum prosperity.

    2. A Universally Commensurable, Value-Neutral, Formal Logic (Science) of Natural Law (language, psychology, sociology, law, politics, group strategy, aesthetics)

    3. A Universal, Constitutional Framework, for Optimum Government, and a body of law within it, providing the completion of the European, Aristotelian, Constitutional Project

    5. The formal codification of the Group Evolutionary Strategy of the European People, and an explanation for their disproportionate success.

    Our ‘Book’: The ‘Sacred’ Law of European Peoples.

    (pinned)

  • Is/ought = marginal indifference (chocolate/vanilla) Success/Failure = Marginal

    Is/ought = marginal indifference (chocolate/vanilla)
    Success/Failure = Marginal Difference
    not-error/error = Marginal Difference
    True/False = Decidability in context

    What is the personal, social, political, evolutionary cost of sedation by delusion?

    Dark Ages. That’s what.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 17:48:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322596311930195972

    Reply addressees: @cbstrohl

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322590915593228290

  • Demonstrated preference vs stated preference. Demonstrated preference refers to

    Demonstrated preference vs stated preference.
    Demonstrated preference refers to an organism’s bias to act to acquire or defend resources (incl investments and opportunities), in one, more, many, or all instances. Stated preferences are signals – nothing more(posturing).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 19:26:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321896086450163712

    Reply addressees: @PotsPol

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321892812686766083

  • A god is an archetypal fictional character that serves as a highly intuitive sys

    A god is an archetypal fictional character that serves as a highly intuitive system of measurment for a group’s evolutionary strategy. The presumption of mental transparency produces arms-length introspection which disentangles (depersonalizes) self-image from that reflection.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-24 00:21:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1319796002413596672

    Reply addressees: @CarsonMcCuller5

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1319778545539887106

  • IMPORTANT: Whether we say truth is a constraint of reciprocity, or reciprocity i

     

    IMPORTANT: Whether we say truth is a constraint of reciprocity, or reciprocity is a constraint of truth, depends on whether the context of the question is decidability in law (top-down) or decidability in physics (bottom-up). But it’s the same either way.

    —“Truth is what we test for in claims, reciprocity is what we test for in propositions.”— Martin Stepan

    METHOD: The method we use is exhaustive disambiguation, by serialization (into measurements), operationalization (commensurability of measurements), synthesis (commensurability of processes), incentives (opportunity), equilibria(counter opportunity. ie: Constructivism as falsificationism.

  • SPECIES: Are determined by groups (populations) that do not regularly breed with

    SPECIES: Are determined by groups (populations) that do not regularly breed with one another. Humans are hyper adaptive. The fact that we can and do opportunistically interbreed a little, does not diminish our speciation. It’s a measure of our promiscuity and drive for fertility.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-19 17:41:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1318245984217059336

  • The method I use is exhaustive disambiguation, by serialization (into measuremen

    The method I use is exhaustive disambiguation, by serialization (into measurements), operationalization (commensurability of measurements), synthesis (commensurability of processes), incentives (opportunity), equilibria(counter opportunity. ie: Constructivism as falsificationism.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-19 15:55:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1318219327154376704

  • SPECIES: “Groups that do not regularly breed with one another.”

    SPECIES: “Groups that do not regularly breed with one another.”

    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-17 22:48:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1317598287646629888

  • Testifiability (Empiricism), Material (Realism and Naturalism), Rational (capita

    Testifiability (Empiricism), Material (Realism and Naturalism), Rational (capitalizing), Reciprocal (capitalizing) political (personally rational, interpersonally reciprocal, commons capitalizing and eugenic capitalizing)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-15 16:48:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316783087460790280

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316783086303145985

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Because that’s what a truth claim means: Testimony that is consistent, composable (possible, operational), correspondent, complete (fully accounted), parsimonious (realism, naturalism), rational (choice, personal), and reciprocal (interpersonal), capitalizing, and eugenic.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1316783086303145985

  • (… more ) So, Definitions: **Bad** = Minor imposition of costs (by accident or

    (… more )

    So, Definitions:

    **Bad** = Minor imposition of costs (by accident or ignorance)
    **Unethical** = Obtaining benefits or escaping losses by direct interpersonal Imposition of costs, by taking advantage of asymmetry (differences ) in knowledge (taking advantage of others’ ignorance).
    **Immoral** = Obtaining benefits or escaping losses by indirectly by taking advantage of others’ ignorance of your actions.
    **Evil** = Imposition of costs directly or indirectly, even if not beneficial to you, for no other reason than to cause them harm, especially by taking advantage of their trust.

    **Amoral** = no effect on the inventory of others.

    **Good** = Minor contribution of benefit to self or others (by accident or ignorance)
    **Ethical** = Obtaining benefits or escaping losses by direct interpersonal voluntary exchange of costs, by forgoing the opportunity of taking advantage of asymmetry (differences ) in knowledge (taking advantage of others’ ignorance).
    **Moral** = Obtaining benefits or escaping losses indirectly by forgoing taking advantage of others’ ignorance of your actions.
    **Virtuous** = Bearing of costs for the benefit of others even if not beneficial to you, for no other reason than to improve others’ condition, especially by rewarding their trust.
    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-14 19:04:29 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105034695886785885

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105034693740534594

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    IS MORALITY RELATIVE? (NO) THE CORRECT ANSWER As always, I’ll ‘science it’ and provide the analytic answer. SPECTRUM: **Evil** < Immoral < unethical < bad (undesirable) good (desirable) > Ethical > Moral > **Virtuous** The human brain uses only three chemicals to provide us with incentives. These were necessary before we developed agency (choice and consciousness). And once we evolved agency all we have done is increase the complexity of the circumstances we can predict and choose from. The most important of these chemicals is the one that encourages us to preserve or acquire calories in time with the energy we possess given the returns that those calories will provide. We maintain intuitionistic measures of our energy level, our inventory of assets, our inventory of opportunities, our inventory of cooperative debts (others have invested in us), and credits (we have invested in others). And human cognition accounts for caloric opportunities, gains, and costs, with extraordinary precision. One of the most surprising assets we possess is our self-image and social status (our market value in cooperation with others). Because the highest returns always are provided through cooperation. And this cooperation – voluntary cooperation that is in our interests – is the reason for human exceptional success in relation to other creatures. The degree of cooperation and what we cooperate to produce also determines the relative condition of groups of people (classes, nations, civilizations). As such bad refers to the imposition of costs upon the inventories of others: energies, assets, opportunities, and credits. And good refers to the increase in inventory, energy, assets, opportunities, and credits (or decrease in debts). (more … )

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105034693740534594