Form: Definition

  • Like I said. Metaphysics = Paradigm (constant relations), the only surviving par

    Like I said. Metaphysics = Paradigm (constant relations), the only surviving paradigm is physics (observable, measurable, testifiable, operational) and no other paradigms have produced even a single testifiable case. We’ve failed a century looking for just one supernatural case.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-14 16:04:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1327643626252414977

    Reply addressees: @Swordo9 @Odious_Ledger

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1327642882757505024

  • Cycle theory is not a mathematical model, it is a combination of data models, pr

    Cycle theory is not a mathematical model, it is a combination of data models, producing overlapping behavioral models, determined at the margins where people lack knowledge and incentives to act other than they do. This is FALSIFICATIONARY modeling – where knowledge fails. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1327278107586408450

  • “P-” is a shorthand tag disambiguating our formal logic from the common usage. S

    “P-” is a shorthand tag disambiguating our formal logic from the common usage. So P-logic (operational) vs Logic (sets), or P-Law (formal operational logic of natural law) vs Law (the kitchen sink). Law proper (tort) measures by property (interests). So Propertarian = P-prefix. https://twitter.com/SonOfJapheth/status/1326952202762641410

  • It’s a tag to disambiguate our formal logic from the informal common sense usage

    It’s a tag to disambiguate our formal logic from the informal common sense usage. So P-logic (operational) vs Logic (sets), or P-Law (formal operational logic of natural law) vs Law (the kitchen sink). Law proper (tort) measures by property. Propertarian = P = P-prefix.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-12 18:20:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326952982311788549

    Reply addressees: @SonOfJapheth @ConnorMarek

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326952202762641410

  • Reductive Example of Our Work in Natural Law

    1) Natural Law: Reciprocity in display, word and deed: productive, exhaustively informed, restitutable(reversible), voluntary transfer, of demonstrated interests, free of imposition on the demonstrated interests of others by externality, exhaustively warrantied by due diligence. 2) Truth: Testimony: exhaustive due diligence by tests of realism, naturalism, identity, internal consistency, operational possibility, external correspondence, rational choice, reciprocity, competitive parsimony, within stated limits, and of full accounting within them. 3) Demonstrated interest: born cost by action or inaction to demonstrate an interest (investment), in the preservation or capture of a savings in time (value) such interests provide (‘capital’). Where time is the one resource we are born with to spend on life and reproduction. 4) Demonstrated Capital (value): Life, body, actions, time, mind, memories, mates, kin, status. Personal Interests (property), associative and cooperative interests, shareholder interests, interests in the commons, common informal institutions, and common formal institutions. 5) Spectrum: Demonstrated Interest > Physical possession > consensual possession (agreeement) > normative possession (insured by all by norm) > institutional posession (insured by polity by law) & Full interest >enumerated share interest > unenumerated share interest (commons). Assignable Rights: 1) Constituo – Homesteading: demonstrating. 2) Transitus – Transit: passage. 3) Usus – Use: setting up a stall. 4) Fructus – Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits) 5) Mancipio – Emancipation: (sale, transfer) 6) Abusus – Abuse: (Consumption or Destruction) This is just an example of our work on the Formal Logic of Natural law.

  • Reductive Example of Our Work in Natural Law

    1) Natural Law: Reciprocity in display, word and deed: productive, exhaustively informed, restitutable(reversible), voluntary transfer, of demonstrated interests, free of imposition on the demonstrated interests of others by externality, exhaustively warrantied by due diligence. 2) Truth: Testimony: exhaustive due diligence by tests of realism, naturalism, identity, internal consistency, operational possibility, external correspondence, rational choice, reciprocity, competitive parsimony, within stated limits, and of full accounting within them. 3) Demonstrated interest: born cost by action or inaction to demonstrate an interest (investment), in the preservation or capture of a savings in time (value) such interests provide (‘capital’). Where time is the one resource we are born with to spend on life and reproduction. 4) Demonstrated Capital (value): Life, body, actions, time, mind, memories, mates, kin, status. Personal Interests (property), associative and cooperative interests, shareholder interests, interests in the commons, common informal institutions, and common formal institutions. 5) Spectrum: Demonstrated Interest > Physical possession > consensual possession (agreeement) > normative possession (insured by all by norm) > institutional posession (insured by polity by law) & Full interest >enumerated share interest > unenumerated share interest (commons). Assignable Rights: 1) Constituo – Homesteading: demonstrating. 2) Transitus – Transit: passage. 3) Usus – Use: setting up a stall. 4) Fructus – Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits) 5) Mancipio – Emancipation: (sale, transfer) 6) Abusus – Abuse: (Consumption or Destruction) This is just an example of our work on the Formal Logic of Natural law.

  • P-Law is the formal logic of the behavioral sciences: language, psychology, soci

    P-Law is the formal logic of the behavioral sciences: language, psychology, sociology, economics, ethics, law, politics, and group strategies. It’s NOT EASY. It’s behavioral economics and law at once. But it is the MOST relevant and rewarding intellectual investment you can make.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-12 17:30:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326940428348878848

  • Western Eugenics: Do not marry, mate, or produce offspring until you can afford

    Western Eugenics: Do not marry, mate, or produce offspring until you can afford a household, sufficient savings, and time and effort to pay the cost of your reproduction without externalizing costs onto others – instead we produce high-quality high trust commons to SHARE cheaply.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-12 17:11:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326935775750066177

  • Testifiable is a scientific term. You either can testify to a truth claim or you

    Testifiable is a scientific term. You either can testify to a truth claim or you can’t.If you cant testify to it then de facto you cant claim it’s true. Empiricism means ‘due diligence sufficient for the production of testimony.’ That’s because science is an extension of our law.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-12 15:34:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326911255471415296

    Reply addressees: @sjruuuj @WorMartiN @CaliperKitten @JoseAmroo @revivingtheman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326910237706768385

  • No. Elimination of disambiguation is the function of grammar. Grammar consists o

    No. Elimination of disambiguation is the function of grammar. Grammar consists of rules of continuous recursive disambiguation. Unambiguity is the only limi and the only closure available. That’s why the analytic program failed. And why all logics are only falsificationary.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-12 06:15:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326770538149277703

    Reply addressees: @sjruuuj @JoseAmroo @revivingtheman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1326765337497513985