Form: Definition

  • And so again we come to declarative (is) vs imperative (can, must, should). And

    And so again we come to declarative (is) vs imperative (can, must, should). And the difference is decidability in matters of conflict (is) vs decidability in matters of agreement (can must should). Via negativa law vs via positiva philosophy, and conflation of both by theology.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-02 16:49:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1356645899137667077

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1356645538632982529


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Imperius__13 Beauty is no different from any other experience, or any other truth. We have exerperiences, associations based on them, and personal valuations of them for extremely ideosyncratic reasons. So knowing First Causes (what I do) only provides understanding not prescription.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1356645538632982529

  • “Sigillum Militum De Iuris Naturae” “The Sigil of the Militia of the Natural Law

    “Sigillum Militum De Iuris Naturae”
    “The Sigil of the Militia of the Natural Law”
    “The Inquisition Of The Law of Nature and Nature’s God.”
    “Veritas Et Violentia”: Truth or Consequences.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-31 00:36:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355676363991216134

  • Major Update to GSRRM Definition

    The Female Technique of Social Superpredation by Gossiping Shaming Ridiculing Rallying and Moralizing

    • Undermining (blaming) by GSRRM: Disapproving > Denying, Shaming > Gossiping, Outraging > Rallying, Psychologizing > Moralizing, Dominating > Oppressing, Reputation-Destruction > Propagandizing (Limiting consumption)

    The Technique of “GSRRM” includes: … (L)ying by Plausible Deniability By: … (E)vading the Truth By: … (E)quating Truth to (F)ace, (A)pproval, or (C)onsent By: … (D)isapproving … … (D)enying … … … (S)ilence And By Escalating To: … (S)haming, … … (M)oralizing, … … … (P)sychologizing, … … … … (R)idiculing … … … … … (O)utraging, And By Escalating To: … (R)allying … … (G)ossiping … … … (U)ndermining, … … … … (P)ropagandizing And By Escalating To: … (S)houting Down … … (S)ilencing … … … (C)ancelling  … … … … (D)eplatforming (interference in communication and colaboration) And By Escalating to: … (R)eputation destruction (interference in reputation) … … (D)oxxing (interference in safety and anonymity) … … … (J)ob Doxxing (interference in employement) … … … … (B)usiness Doxxing (interference in the conduct of a business) And By Escalating to: … (C)ourt Abuse (using cost of litigation to silence, obtain false confession, or to harm) … … (J)udicial Abuse (using select cases to exploit vunlerabilities in the law) … … … (C)onstitutional Abuse (using advocacy of incrementally harmful legislation to exploit vulnerabilities in the construction of the constitution, under cover of moral pretense) And By Escalating to: … (M)ore…

    In western history under our ancient laws, men were prohibited from reputation destruction by direct violence between men under the law of the Duel. 

    In western history Female Conflict (social violence by GSRRM) was largely illegal or punishable under laws against “scolds” –women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace.

    During the democratic and Marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony).

    Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM.

    GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience.

  • Major Update to GSRRM Definition

    The Female Technique of Social Superpredation by Gossiping Shaming Ridiculing Rallying and Moralizing

    • Undermining (blaming) by GSRRM: Disapproving > Denying, Shaming > Gossiping, Outraging > Rallying, Psychologizing > Moralizing, Dominating > Oppressing, Reputation-Destruction > Propagandizing (Limiting consumption)

    The Technique of “GSRRM” includes: … (L)ying by Plausible Deniability By: … (E)vading the Truth By: … (E)quating Truth to (F)ace, (A)pproval, or (C)onsent By: … (D)isapproving … … (D)enying … … … (S)ilence And By Escalating To: … (S)haming, … … (M)oralizing, … … … (P)sychologizing, … … … … (R)idiculing … … … … … (O)utraging, And By Escalating To: … (R)allying … … (G)ossiping … … … (U)ndermining, … … … … (P)ropagandizing And By Escalating To: … (S)houting Down … … (S)ilencing … … … (C)ancelling  … … … … (D)eplatforming (interference in communication and colaboration) And By Escalating to: … (R)eputation destruction (interference in reputation) … … (D)oxxing (interference in safety and anonymity) … … … (J)ob Doxxing (interference in employement) … … … … (B)usiness Doxxing (interference in the conduct of a business) And By Escalating to: … (C)ourt Abuse (using cost of litigation to silence, obtain false confession, or to harm) … … (J)udicial Abuse (using select cases to exploit vunlerabilities in the law) … … … (C)onstitutional Abuse (using advocacy of incrementally harmful legislation to exploit vulnerabilities in the construction of the constitution, under cover of moral pretense) And By Escalating to: … (M)ore…

    In western history under our ancient laws, men were prohibited from reputation destruction by direct violence between men under the law of the Duel. 

    In western history Female Conflict (social violence by GSRRM) was largely illegal or punishable under laws against “scolds” –women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace.

    During the democratic and Marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony).

    Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM.

    GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience.

  • What Replaces the Term Christianity for Jesus’ Teachings?

    “Christ” means messiah. And it has nothing to do with Jesus or his teachings. It’s another Semitic fictionalism (lie) to convert his philosophical insights into supernatural deceits, to build a church of revolution (army of undermining) against civilization, with Jesus’ insights into how to tolerate the change brought about by civilization – a vast increase in the division of labor knowledge and ability. So I don’t know what to call the teachings of Jesus, like any other philosopher, without the ‘lie’ christ (Christianity) around it. Archimedes, Democritus, Aristotle, Plato, Epicurus, Jesus, Confucius. So Jesusism? Nazareneism? Loveism? I dunno but something devoid of the Semitic hatred of reality, of life, of mankind, of civilization, of joy.

  • What Replaces the Term Christianity for Jesus’ Teachings?

    “Christ” means messiah. And it has nothing to do with Jesus or his teachings. It’s another Semitic fictionalism (lie) to convert his philosophical insights into supernatural deceits, to build a church of revolution (army of undermining) against civilization, with Jesus’ insights into how to tolerate the change brought about by civilization – a vast increase in the division of labor knowledge and ability. So I don’t know what to call the teachings of Jesus, like any other philosopher, without the ‘lie’ christ (Christianity) around it. Archimedes, Democritus, Aristotle, Plato, Epicurus, Jesus, Confucius. So Jesusism? Nazareneism? Loveism? I dunno but something devoid of the Semitic hatred of reality, of life, of mankind, of civilization, of joy.

  • NEW ABRAHAMISM Postmodern thought is simply an application of denial of reality(

    NEW ABRAHAMISM
    Postmodern thought is simply an application of denial of reality(fraud), and evasion of truth and reciprocity, by obscurantism (failing to provide a solution), Pilpul (sophistry) and Critique (undermining) to deny reality without historical appeal to supernaturals.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 03:14:41 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105642490708130496

  • Repeat: The logic of Identity: Physical (math) The logic of Sets: Words (verbal

    Repeat:
    The logic of Identity: Physical (math)
    The logic of Sets: Words (verbal logic)
    The logic of Operations: Actions (algorithms, programming)


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-27 22:00:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1354549952769372161

  • Q: Explain or Define Fascism (still adding)

    Define Fascism. If you can’t define the political, economic, social, familial, and religious models then you don’t know enough to opine. How: Enumerate cooperative markets for cooperation: given territory, resources, people, their labor, their property, and existing built capital – those markets are association(friends), reproduction(the family), production of education, production of cooperation(social groups), production(the economy), production of commons(the government), production of polities (neighborhoods, villages, cities, states, empires), war. Then: Define how any political model organizes and operates each of these markets. Fascism has the following properties:

    1) Organizing the State for Total War (non-competition) against informational, ideological, philosophical, cultural, religious, or demographic undermining, insurrection, conversion, or invasion, by eliminating political, economic, social, ideological, philosophical religious, ethnic competition.

    The peace of westphalia mandated state monopoly of violence, tehreby ending the wars of religion and limiting states to war.

    Napoleon Restored Roman Total Military war, and destroyed the 1000 year old holy roman empire of the greater german people, and the origin of the rebellion against the corruption of the church. The french revolution sought to replace the church and state with a secular equivalent on the roman model. Combined germanic russian civilization ended french imperialism over continental europe. Today’s ‘EU’ project is the french political rather than military attempt to repeat their napoleonic conquest of europe, using the temporary timidity of the german cuture, and the enormous bankroll and industrial capacity of the german people.

    The Marxists (largely under jewish leadership) conducted total information, ideological, philosophical, cultural, religious, class, and ethnic warfare. Marxism repeated the jewish, christian, and muslim war of sedition and insurrection in the ancient world thanks to the modernization provided by roman commerce and roman roads, in the moddern world thanks to the modernization provided by the anglo industrial revolution and the age of sail.

    Fascism was a counter-revolution against the Marxists as well as the classical liberals.

    So consider sectors of society as markets and total war as war against all markets that produce social coherence, trust, organization and production.

    Simple version: fascism biases the organs of the state, economy, society, family, education, and religion into an extension of the military model of organization to limit means of ‘betrayal’, insurrection, defection, and treason – war – against the markets necessary for the organization and preservation of cooperation that produces the available means of self-determination.

    2) Ethnocentrism (non competition)

    3) Identitarian State Religion (non competition) –

    4) Conformity, Integration – (non-competition: status)

    5) Familism and Capitalization of Commonsnot Individualism and consumption (non-competition) (qulality family commons reduce demand for income)

    6) Maximization of Autarky – (non-competition)

    7) Economic Socialism – (non-competition) There are four versions of socialism:

        1. Communist State Socialism (underclass rule) where the state eliminates private property and controls all investment, employment, production distribution, and trade: the soviet model. In this model the militarization of society is complete at the expense of the incentives provided by the pricing and merit system. This is possible, just as organizing any country for war is possible for a short time, but it incentivizes black markets, corruption, and maximization of rent seeking.
        2. Prewar French State Socialism (Aristocratic Rule) – How french, germans, Italians understood it: Nationalizing the industrial revolution to maximize the production commons for common people rather than developing a capitalist class that was not responsible to the people. And leaving non-industrial production distribution and trade to the private sector. This is possible until industries are established, and corruption and rent seeking emerge, and manageent must be privatized.
          Mixed Economy, State industrial Socialism, Consumer Capitalism.
        3. Postwar Democratic socialism: (Today’s continental socialism): where the state recognizes it is not competent in the management of capital and maximizes the extraction and redisttributon of tax revenues. This is possible until rents are maximized indirectly through the state instead of directly through industry.
          Mixed Economy State ownership of private property, licensed to the public for the production of taxes, that are then redistributed.
        4. The Original Anglo Pro-Social Model: (Aristocratic Rule) The appropriation of taxes from the windfall of the industrial revolution and empire, to produce necessary and benficial commons but NOT interfering with continuation of natural selection by markets, and market suppression of reproduction of the unfit for markets.

    The State is Organized for Total War by:

      1. State Eradication of competition in all markets across the spectrum.
      2. State propagation of an ethnocentric, secular ‘religion’ of ethnicity, culture, and state, with tolerance for weak institutional religions if they are non-competitive.(buddhism, orthodoxy).
      3. State-Private ‘partnership’ of finance – meaning virtual state ownership of banking and finance, limiting bank and financial investments to those that benefit the state and its mission to conduct total war against a
      4. State-Private partnership in the industrial invention, production, distribution and trade. And Maximizing Autarky (economic independence), and in particular (this is usually unstated) ending price arbitrage, and in particular wage arbitrage, that allows industry to profit from outsourcing labor, technology, or production.
      5. Maximizing Production of SHARED commons while reducing personal consumption. Investment in infrastructure (transport, water, power, data) and housing (apartments, condos, urbanization) and environment (parks, public spaces, religious spaces), and core consumer goods, services, and information, that reduce the need for individual and family income.(This serves as redistribution by commons instead of by cash redistribution and has the benefit of higher longer returns, and higher socialization.)However it requires a homogenous ethnocentric polity, that is capable of impulse control, and low tolerance for ‘inappropriate for family’ behavior. That’s why heterogeneous polities are ‘dumps’.
      6. State family formation.
      7. State social formation. State norm regulation
      8. State religion and education formation.
      9. State Direction of Capital to Military Defense

    Today’s China is fascist (Total war against the outside), not Communist(ideological war against all inside classes) or socialist(domestic economic war against inside capitalists). Fascism arises because of competitino due to the failure of the french englighnment false promise of the benefolence of man, the compatibility of nations religions and civilizations. The Optimum Political Order

    The optimum political order is a military federation of small ethnocentric polities for maximizing quality of life (germanic europe), or a vast conquering, assimilating, civilization state to maximize mondernization and war (india, china).The Optimum Political System

    Rule of Law by the Natural Law of Reciprocity A Monarchy as a judge of last resort. An independent Judiciary A professional cabinet of ministers A parliament with houses for classes creating a market for commons between classes. Non-elected, but randomly selected, jurors to sit those houses EIther direct proportional (for policy) or economic voting (for expenditures) Meritocratic criteria requiring earning of the vote. A Treasury with state monopoly on consumer credit. State hyper investment and ownership in research and development and heavy capital investment industries. An Insurer of last resort for disasters and emergencies A religion of nature, ancestor, and hero thanks (debt). A universal militia (swiss), emergency services, and hospitaliers, and a standing professional (elite) army. Deterrent by Nuclear weapons.

  • Q: Explain or Define Fascism (still adding)

    Define Fascism. If you can’t define the political, economic, social, familial, and religious models then you don’t know enough to opine. How: Enumerate cooperative markets for cooperation: given territory, resources, people, their labor, their property, and existing built capital – those markets are association(friends), reproduction(the family), production of education, production of cooperation(social groups), production(the economy), production of commons(the government), production of polities (neighborhoods, villages, cities, states, empires), war. Then: Define how any political model organizes and operates each of these markets. Fascism has the following properties:

    1) Organizing the State for Total War (non-competition) against informational, ideological, philosophical, cultural, religious, or demographic undermining, insurrection, conversion, or invasion, by eliminating political, economic, social, ideological, philosophical religious, ethnic competition.

    The peace of westphalia mandated state monopoly of violence, tehreby ending the wars of religion and limiting states to war.

    Napoleon Restored Roman Total Military war, and destroyed the 1000 year old holy roman empire of the greater german people, and the origin of the rebellion against the corruption of the church. The french revolution sought to replace the church and state with a secular equivalent on the roman model. Combined germanic russian civilization ended french imperialism over continental europe. Today’s ‘EU’ project is the french political rather than military attempt to repeat their napoleonic conquest of europe, using the temporary timidity of the german cuture, and the enormous bankroll and industrial capacity of the german people.

    The Marxists (largely under jewish leadership) conducted total information, ideological, philosophical, cultural, religious, class, and ethnic warfare. Marxism repeated the jewish, christian, and muslim war of sedition and insurrection in the ancient world thanks to the modernization provided by roman commerce and roman roads, in the moddern world thanks to the modernization provided by the anglo industrial revolution and the age of sail.

    Fascism was a counter-revolution against the Marxists as well as the classical liberals.

    So consider sectors of society as markets and total war as war against all markets that produce social coherence, trust, organization and production.

    Simple version: fascism biases the organs of the state, economy, society, family, education, and religion into an extension of the military model of organization to limit means of ‘betrayal’, insurrection, defection, and treason – war – against the markets necessary for the organization and preservation of cooperation that produces the available means of self-determination.

    2) Ethnocentrism (non competition)

    3) Identitarian State Religion (non competition) –

    4) Conformity, Integration – (non-competition: status)

    5) Familism and Capitalization of Commonsnot Individualism and consumption (non-competition) (qulality family commons reduce demand for income)

    6) Maximization of Autarky – (non-competition)

    7) Economic Socialism – (non-competition) There are four versions of socialism:

        1. Communist State Socialism (underclass rule) where the state eliminates private property and controls all investment, employment, production distribution, and trade: the soviet model. In this model the militarization of society is complete at the expense of the incentives provided by the pricing and merit system. This is possible, just as organizing any country for war is possible for a short time, but it incentivizes black markets, corruption, and maximization of rent seeking.
        2. Prewar French State Socialism (Aristocratic Rule) – How french, germans, Italians understood it: Nationalizing the industrial revolution to maximize the production commons for common people rather than developing a capitalist class that was not responsible to the people. And leaving non-industrial production distribution and trade to the private sector. This is possible until industries are established, and corruption and rent seeking emerge, and manageent must be privatized.
          Mixed Economy, State industrial Socialism, Consumer Capitalism.
        3. Postwar Democratic socialism: (Today’s continental socialism): where the state recognizes it is not competent in the management of capital and maximizes the extraction and redisttributon of tax revenues. This is possible until rents are maximized indirectly through the state instead of directly through industry.
          Mixed Economy State ownership of private property, licensed to the public for the production of taxes, that are then redistributed.
        4. The Original Anglo Pro-Social Model: (Aristocratic Rule) The appropriation of taxes from the windfall of the industrial revolution and empire, to produce necessary and benficial commons but NOT interfering with continuation of natural selection by markets, and market suppression of reproduction of the unfit for markets.

    The State is Organized for Total War by:

      1. State Eradication of competition in all markets across the spectrum.
      2. State propagation of an ethnocentric, secular ‘religion’ of ethnicity, culture, and state, with tolerance for weak institutional religions if they are non-competitive.(buddhism, orthodoxy).
      3. State-Private ‘partnership’ of finance – meaning virtual state ownership of banking and finance, limiting bank and financial investments to those that benefit the state and its mission to conduct total war against a
      4. State-Private partnership in the industrial invention, production, distribution and trade. And Maximizing Autarky (economic independence), and in particular (this is usually unstated) ending price arbitrage, and in particular wage arbitrage, that allows industry to profit from outsourcing labor, technology, or production.
      5. Maximizing Production of SHARED commons while reducing personal consumption. Investment in infrastructure (transport, water, power, data) and housing (apartments, condos, urbanization) and environment (parks, public spaces, religious spaces), and core consumer goods, services, and information, that reduce the need for individual and family income.(This serves as redistribution by commons instead of by cash redistribution and has the benefit of higher longer returns, and higher socialization.)However it requires a homogenous ethnocentric polity, that is capable of impulse control, and low tolerance for ‘inappropriate for family’ behavior. That’s why heterogeneous polities are ‘dumps’.
      6. State family formation.
      7. State social formation. State norm regulation
      8. State religion and education formation.
      9. State Direction of Capital to Military Defense

    Today’s China is fascist (Total war against the outside), not Communist(ideological war against all inside classes) or socialist(domestic economic war against inside capitalists). Fascism arises because of competitino due to the failure of the french englighnment false promise of the benefolence of man, the compatibility of nations religions and civilizations. The Optimum Political Order

    The optimum political order is a military federation of small ethnocentric polities for maximizing quality of life (germanic europe), or a vast conquering, assimilating, civilization state to maximize mondernization and war (india, china).The Optimum Political System

    Rule of Law by the Natural Law of Reciprocity A Monarchy as a judge of last resort. An independent Judiciary A professional cabinet of ministers A parliament with houses for classes creating a market for commons between classes. Non-elected, but randomly selected, jurors to sit those houses EIther direct proportional (for policy) or economic voting (for expenditures) Meritocratic criteria requiring earning of the vote. A Treasury with state monopoly on consumer credit. State hyper investment and ownership in research and development and heavy capital investment industries. An Insurer of last resort for disasters and emergencies A religion of nature, ancestor, and hero thanks (debt). A universal militia (swiss), emergency services, and hospitaliers, and a standing professional (elite) army. Deterrent by Nuclear weapons.