Curt Doolittle

Form: Critique

  • 4) Why it is that you simpletons imagine you have opinions on the great question

    4) Why it is that you simpletons imagine you have opinions on the great questions of intellectual history, when you can’t even grasp the basic questions that cause them is beyond me – other than that you’re so desperate for meaning and agency that you grasp at straws of ignornace

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-22 23:26:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286080222408978434

    Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @Nationalist7346 @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286072636297027584

  • ^Fail. 1) Are you saying evolution by natural selection, domestication by neoten

    ^Fail.
    1) Are you saying evolution by natural selection, domestication by neoteny, regression to the mean, the history of the market and agrarian eugenics, and the variation id class sizes isn’t scientific (testimony?)

    Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @Nationalist7346 @TruthQuest11

  • I don’t see that you have a debate other than that you are following the Traditi

    I don’t see that you have a debate other than that you are following the Tradition RU habit of historical revisionism and data-cherrypicking in order to avoid the central thesis, of force labor discounts at cost of corruption, vs incentive labor costs in favor of productivity.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-21 19:35:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285659628811034624

    Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285659217022648322

  • I don’t see that you have a debate other than that you are following the Traditi

    I don’t see that you have a debate other than that you are following the Tradition RU habit of historical revisionism and data-cherrypicking in order to avoid the central thesis, of force labor discounts at cost of corruption, vs incentive labor costs in favor of productivity.

    Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4

  • Comments on Weinstein Brothers and Taleb

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxlVAbc1Vjo THE PROCESS UNDERFOOT IS THE SECOND ABRAHAMIC DESTRUCTION OF CIVILIZATION FROM WITHIN BY FALSE PROMISE OF FREEDOM The “process that’s afoot in the world” is systematic postwar de-Prussianization of sensemaking (European martial, scientific, and technological sense-making), so that advanced technological civilizations are possible for the many who must function in it at all levels. And where those of us who are intellectually exceptional will succeed at innovation anyway, as we have in Europe across all time. What ‘you’ can’t tolerate is the loyalty (and piety) that must be demonstrated to the vast majority who require that Prussian Discipline. It is those people that make the civilization function. It’s those of us who are intellectual elites that give them to tools. Most influential professor I ever said (not that I had many) said to me “The world is not made for us. It is made for them, and it must be. We can only help them.” That was his version of ‘We are but tiny riders on large and willful elephants’. ACADEMY I couldn’t have succeeded in the Academy because there is no advantage to graduate serfdom, and cross-disciplinary research that takes a minimum of ten years to produce a meaningful output is intolerable to the system – the same reason Higgs gave that he wouldn’t survive in the system today. I made a fortune intead and it’s the only reason I can speak the unvarnished truth about every taboo, learn from defeating them, and produce law, policy, and institutions to restore Prussian(martial, duty), Anglo (legal scientific), European(primacy of man, by commons, reciprocal, truthful speech, high trust), sense-making, and Aesthetics (Greco Italian primacy, heroism, and tragedy of man). TALEB What Nassim gets wrong, and what you are getting wrong, is that the solution to the problem of the postwar age is the restoration of the traditional European martial demand for Truthful, Reciprocal, Warrantable, Speech in public, enforced by law. He still can’t face the fact that his project, if he completed it, would require two admissions: (a) that the information necessary for a mathematical estimation of the information necessary to predict a black swan event will require a unit of measurement not achievable without an artificial intelligence to create a standard of computational measure. (b) that the only ‘skin in the game’ possible is warranty of due diligence within the limits of restitutability. In other words: traditional European natural law of tort against interests BOTH private AND common. WHAT’S LEFT OF THE USA What’s left of the US? They’re the Middle America that you despise. They’re still Germanic. They’re still loyal. They still do their duty. They’re still disciplined. They’re everything the postwar Jewish thought leadership brought here to the states has done everything possible to destroy those values. For the same reason, ancestors wouldn’t make a gesture of fealty to Rome. The Undermining of Sense-Making, and Civilization version two: Boaz, Freud, Marx, Mises (yes), Cantor (yes), Bohr (yes), Adorno-Fromm (et all), Gramsci, Derrida, Friedan, Rand-Rothbard, Trotsky-Strauss-Kristol (et all), and yes, the Weinsteins who claim that they are followers of the European tradition rather than the postwar Jewish tradition to destroy it like every other host civilization: The traditional Jewish rebellion against realism, naturalism, decidability, testimony, reason, reciprocity, duty, and commons. Science = Legal Testimony under realism, naturalism, operationalism, and reciprocity. That’s why only Europeans discovered it. THE LEFT’S STRATEGY IS JUST JUDAISM > CHRISTIANITY > MARXISM > NEOMARXISM The strategy in that’s being used is the institutionalization of the female strategy of undermining alphas in the Abrahamic Religions: Jewish, Christian, Islam: Claiming aristocracies are oppressors for discovery, adaptation to, and application of the physical, natural and evolutionary laws, and selling the unwarrantable, plausibly deniable, false promise (seduction), of freedom from oppression by those laws using the deceptions of Pilpul(sophistry, denial, relativism, preference before truth,), Critique(undermining, straw-manning, and heaping of undue praise vs arguing the central premises in pursuit of the truth). They’re repeating the Christianization of the west with the false promise in this life rather than the next, in exchange for destroying the civilization that makes their rebellion possile. And yes I know why everyone is terrified of debating me. I’m even less ‘tolerable’ than Taleb. 😉

  • Comments on Weinstein Brothers and Taleb

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxlVAbc1Vjo THE PROCESS UNDERFOOT IS THE SECOND ABRAHAMIC DESTRUCTION OF CIVILIZATION FROM WITHIN BY FALSE PROMISE OF FREEDOM The “process that’s afoot in the world” is systematic postwar de-Prussianization of sensemaking (European martial, scientific, and technological sense-making), so that advanced technological civilizations are possible for the many who must function in it at all levels. And where those of us who are intellectually exceptional will succeed at innovation anyway, as we have in Europe across all time. What ‘you’ can’t tolerate is the loyalty (and piety) that must be demonstrated to the vast majority who require that Prussian Discipline. It is those people that make the civilization function. It’s those of us who are intellectual elites that give them to tools. Most influential professor I ever said (not that I had many) said to me “The world is not made for us. It is made for them, and it must be. We can only help them.” That was his version of ‘We are but tiny riders on large and willful elephants’. ACADEMY I couldn’t have succeeded in the Academy because there is no advantage to graduate serfdom, and cross-disciplinary research that takes a minimum of ten years to produce a meaningful output is intolerable to the system – the same reason Higgs gave that he wouldn’t survive in the system today. I made a fortune intead and it’s the only reason I can speak the unvarnished truth about every taboo, learn from defeating them, and produce law, policy, and institutions to restore Prussian(martial, duty), Anglo (legal scientific), European(primacy of man, by commons, reciprocal, truthful speech, high trust), sense-making, and Aesthetics (Greco Italian primacy, heroism, and tragedy of man). TALEB What Nassim gets wrong, and what you are getting wrong, is that the solution to the problem of the postwar age is the restoration of the traditional European martial demand for Truthful, Reciprocal, Warrantable, Speech in public, enforced by law. He still can’t face the fact that his project, if he completed it, would require two admissions: (a) that the information necessary for a mathematical estimation of the information necessary to predict a black swan event will require a unit of measurement not achievable without an artificial intelligence to create a standard of computational measure. (b) that the only ‘skin in the game’ possible is warranty of due diligence within the limits of restitutability. In other words: traditional European natural law of tort against interests BOTH private AND common. WHAT’S LEFT OF THE USA What’s left of the US? They’re the Middle America that you despise. They’re still Germanic. They’re still loyal. They still do their duty. They’re still disciplined. They’re everything the postwar Jewish thought leadership brought here to the states has done everything possible to destroy those values. For the same reason, ancestors wouldn’t make a gesture of fealty to Rome. The Undermining of Sense-Making, and Civilization version two: Boaz, Freud, Marx, Mises (yes), Cantor (yes), Bohr (yes), Adorno-Fromm (et all), Gramsci, Derrida, Friedan, Rand-Rothbard, Trotsky-Strauss-Kristol (et all), and yes, the Weinsteins who claim that they are followers of the European tradition rather than the postwar Jewish tradition to destroy it like every other host civilization: The traditional Jewish rebellion against realism, naturalism, decidability, testimony, reason, reciprocity, duty, and commons. Science = Legal Testimony under realism, naturalism, operationalism, and reciprocity. That’s why only Europeans discovered it. THE LEFT’S STRATEGY IS JUST JUDAISM > CHRISTIANITY > MARXISM > NEOMARXISM The strategy in that’s being used is the institutionalization of the female strategy of undermining alphas in the Abrahamic Religions: Jewish, Christian, Islam: Claiming aristocracies are oppressors for discovery, adaptation to, and application of the physical, natural and evolutionary laws, and selling the unwarrantable, plausibly deniable, false promise (seduction), of freedom from oppression by those laws using the deceptions of Pilpul(sophistry, denial, relativism, preference before truth,), Critique(undermining, straw-manning, and heaping of undue praise vs arguing the central premises in pursuit of the truth). They’re repeating the Christianization of the west with the false promise in this life rather than the next, in exchange for destroying the civilization that makes their rebellion possile. And yes I know why everyone is terrified of debating me. I’m even less ‘tolerable’ than Taleb. 😉

  • Lessons Learned from “PantsGate” thanks to Western Renaissance

    REGARDING: #Pantsgate – Propertarian July 4th Declaration Analysis

    http://https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbHKU-FllNo

    Great Leadership. Great insight. Lessons Understood. Thank you.

    As for the Problem with Intellectuals: It’s true. This has been an intellectual movement. I am an intellectual and Entrepreneur. I’ve only shifted to the political because it seems no one else will take a political stand, provide a solution other than outrage, or organize a revolutionary body to demand that solution – which is the only means of avoiding bloodshed and destruction (or outright losing).
    I think you’ve identified the problem. And yes, you’ve shown I did in fact have a blind spot.  Because I don’t even SENSE social dominance. Because in my universe only intellectual dominance exists. And in that world, I’m pretty damned secure. Arrogantly so. In fact, among intellectual classes, we intuit it a ‘beneath us’ to play social (political) dominance games. Just like the global wealthy consider fist-fighting beneath them. We consider it clownish. I can’t even imagine a world where ‘the enemy’ is considered anything other than an incompetent ungrateful jealous peasantry foaming at the mouth and chanting nonsense as a substitute for rational adult thought.
    Yet, I see now that it’s a dominance signal to the common man on the right. And so I think you put the problem into (intellectual) terms I can understand, and gave me a solution I can understand: A political movement for laboring, working, and middle-class males (who rely on dominance themselves) must express social dominance they can feel – before they can understand the words and policies being spoken, or support a political movement in their interests whether they understand those policies or not.
    As for Optics: Controlling optics is easy – if you understand that optics are as important to the common folk as they are insulting to the intellectual folk. So yes now I understand.
    As for Events: Events cost nothing. Even great events. Forming PAC and Parties is expensive. Raising money is expensive. Funding advertising campaigns is expensive. But ground games are what they are. And it’s one thing to take a ‘gib me stuf’ campaign, and another to ask men to grasp a political and economic system – and show up to fight for it.
    As for Sensibilities: Correct, I am an anglo classical libertarian. My goals are “let 1000 nations bloom” including WN. It’s just cheaper and happier for all of us that way. And me, I want to live among my own too. But I know that WN will eventually prevail simply because of the natural properties of European civ and European people. And that once WN’s exist under restoration of our law and government, and with defenses against the enemy’s strategy and tactics, that ‘our own’ will ‘flee’ to the WN societies. And those that do not – we do not want them. As for timing: Unless someone else takes up this strategy of providing a devolutionary solution the only possible solution to sovereignty for our people is to put American civilization – and the world by proxy – into a worse state than Europe after the world wars by a repetition of the European civil wars (ww1/2).
    As for Positioning: Our strategy has been to ‘Be the adults in the room. Speak the uncomfortable truth to all parties. Solve the problem of our age for everyone. For Americans. For European civilization. For the world. Take the moral high ground. And then show up in sufficient numbers to control the public narrative. Turn the narrative to the policies. And by our mere presence force its adoption or the population to consider the alternative. Faced with that choice the public will demand policies that are overwhelmingly beneficial to all of them regardless of political affiliation – at the expense of the national and global elites that seek the managed decline of the west, and the incremental destruction of the European peoples, in the pursuit of destroying the west as they have destroyed every other great civilization they touch with the cancer of their false promises and lies.
    As for The Right: You can’t have a world that perfectly suits your faction. So don’t undermine the collective. Reign in your own purity spiraling and disgust response for people on your side. Libertarians, Propertarians, Civic Nationalists, White Nationalists, National Socialists.  We must unite behind what unites us. Don’t impose costs on each other. Cooperation or peaceful separation. And yes, suppress the (“social retards”) raiders.  They are just children (women) testing the boundaries of their parents (sh-t testing). Keep on fighting the good fight.
    And don’t punch our own.

  • Lessons Learned from “PantsGate” thanks to Western Renaissance

    REGARDING: #Pantsgate – Propertarian July 4th Declaration Analysis

    http://https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbHKU-FllNo

    Great Leadership. Great insight. Lessons Understood. Thank you.

    As for the Problem with Intellectuals: It’s true. This has been an intellectual movement. I am an intellectual and Entrepreneur. I’ve only shifted to the political because it seems no one else will take a political stand, provide a solution other than outrage, or organize a revolutionary body to demand that solution – which is the only means of avoiding bloodshed and destruction (or outright losing).
    I think you’ve identified the problem. And yes, you’ve shown I did in fact have a blind spot.  Because I don’t even SENSE social dominance. Because in my universe only intellectual dominance exists. And in that world, I’m pretty damned secure. Arrogantly so. In fact, among intellectual classes, we intuit it a ‘beneath us’ to play social (political) dominance games. Just like the global wealthy consider fist-fighting beneath them. We consider it clownish. I can’t even imagine a world where ‘the enemy’ is considered anything other than an incompetent ungrateful jealous peasantry foaming at the mouth and chanting nonsense as a substitute for rational adult thought.
    Yet, I see now that it’s a dominance signal to the common man on the right. And so I think you put the problem into (intellectual) terms I can understand, and gave me a solution I can understand: A political movement for laboring, working, and middle-class males (who rely on dominance themselves) must express social dominance they can feel – before they can understand the words and policies being spoken, or support a political movement in their interests whether they understand those policies or not.
    As for Optics: Controlling optics is easy – if you understand that optics are as important to the common folk as they are insulting to the intellectual folk. So yes now I understand.
    As for Events: Events cost nothing. Even great events. Forming PAC and Parties is expensive. Raising money is expensive. Funding advertising campaigns is expensive. But ground games are what they are. And it’s one thing to take a ‘gib me stuf’ campaign, and another to ask men to grasp a political and economic system – and show up to fight for it.
    As for Sensibilities: Correct, I am an anglo classical libertarian. My goals are “let 1000 nations bloom” including WN. It’s just cheaper and happier for all of us that way. And me, I want to live among my own too. But I know that WN will eventually prevail simply because of the natural properties of European civ and European people. And that once WN’s exist under restoration of our law and government, and with defenses against the enemy’s strategy and tactics, that ‘our own’ will ‘flee’ to the WN societies. And those that do not – we do not want them. As for timing: Unless someone else takes up this strategy of providing a devolutionary solution the only possible solution to sovereignty for our people is to put American civilization – and the world by proxy – into a worse state than Europe after the world wars by a repetition of the European civil wars (ww1/2).
    As for Positioning: Our strategy has been to ‘Be the adults in the room. Speak the uncomfortable truth to all parties. Solve the problem of our age for everyone. For Americans. For European civilization. For the world. Take the moral high ground. And then show up in sufficient numbers to control the public narrative. Turn the narrative to the policies. And by our mere presence force its adoption or the population to consider the alternative. Faced with that choice the public will demand policies that are overwhelmingly beneficial to all of them regardless of political affiliation – at the expense of the national and global elites that seek the managed decline of the west, and the incremental destruction of the European peoples, in the pursuit of destroying the west as they have destroyed every other great civilization they touch with the cancer of their false promises and lies.
    As for The Right: You can’t have a world that perfectly suits your faction. So don’t undermine the collective. Reign in your own purity spiraling and disgust response for people on your side. Libertarians, Propertarians, Civic Nationalists, White Nationalists, National Socialists.  We must unite behind what unites us. Don’t impose costs on each other. Cooperation or peaceful separation. And yes, suppress the (“social retards”) raiders.  They are just children (women) testing the boundaries of their parents (sh-t testing). Keep on fighting the good fight.
    And don’t punch our own.

  • He stood on the shoulders of many far better men, and Jewish ‘heaping of undue p

    He stood on the shoulders of many far better men, and Jewish ‘heaping of undue praise’ has created the ‘Einstein Industry’ as their one and only heroic intellectual example equal to that of Europeans. Hilbert would have solved the problem correctly. Einstein/Bohr set us backward.

    Reply addressees: @fritzpure @JanHaugland @phalpern

  • Eric and Brett: The Weinstein Brothers Reach-Around

    THE WEINSTEIN BROTHERS REACH-AROUND [A] central theme of my work is the difference in civilizational methods of argument, especially European-male scientific-juridical adversarial-testimony of advancing stated interests openly versus Jewish-female gossiping-undermining justification-consensus method of advancing unstated or hidden interests by undermining oppositions interests. Watch any Brett or Eric Weinstein video and count how many times they  1) use ‘heaping undue praise’. 2) use a ‘test of reasonableness instead of truth‘, 3) use ‘critique of the system‘ that they cannot create, or get access to (loyalty, commons defect). 4) Use “pilpul to cover a presumption” someone didn’t know something prior, or that a concept wasn’t known, or a tradition didn’t exist in western civ. 5) ‘straw man‘ a group of people and their incentives. 6) Using dialectic to commit all of the above frauds in order to position themselves as capable. This is the Abrahamic method of deceit. It’s a process of undermining by overloading with suggestion and deceit rather than truthful description. This is the female method of indirect communication in order to limit offense and show support of allies, or in order to undermine enemies, but without every trying to come up with solutions. And any man that’s had to learn women don’t want solutions to problems and men only want solutions to problems will be aware of this difference in the techniques of the genders.  In other words, all jews are cognitively female.  And this is a particularly useful strategy in an era of radio and television an not as useful a strategy in the age of print – which is rather obvious when comparing Jewish and European authors. Once you know what they’re doing it’s unbearable. They’re gossiping. And they’re just gossiping about interesting nerdy stuff. And the point of their gossip is to increase one another’s self-image and reputation by gossiping in public, to create the pretense that either party is worth listening to at all. When in fact they aren’t. They don’t have solutions. You wouldn’t trust either of them to implement a solution. They just complain.  Which is the ancient criticism of the jews: the work hard (like women), and they complain (like women). But every Jewish solution is suicidal: Christianity, Islam, Marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, anti-male-feminism, political correctness (HBD denialism). Those are for no other purpose than to undermine male hierarchical eugenic competitive, solution-focused, technology providing, man-enabling civilization. And that’s is why jews accomplished nothing in their entire history except the art of baiting-into-hazard until their plausible deniability was no longer deniable and they were cast out of over a hundred countries. Yet once offered entry into western civilization’s social order in exchange for adopting Aristotelianism they were able to make achievements – at the cost of undermining western civilization from within as they had every other civilization before us. And once again, after a century of Jewish liberty in the west, from Bolshevism, Naziism to resist bolshevism, and the movement of bolshevism to America, and its transformation from marxism (class undermining); to neo-marxism (cultural undermining); to postmodernism (truth undermining); to Anti-male Feminism (marriage undermining); to political correctness (HBD and eugenic denialism) – their crimes against host peoples are no longer plausibly deniable: they are antithetical to civilization, and they consider their success at mastering the criminal art of baiting-into-hazard,  and profiting from undermining host peoples, a laudable achievement – rather than parasitism upon host peoples by crimes that are difficult to outlaw and prosecute without impinging upon the opportunities a high trust people can capture because we don’t engage in that undermining ourselves. MATHEMATICS Math is tedious and burdensome on short term memory.  It is not, however, ‘difficult’. It’s just a language for measurement of points (references) using positional names, by distilling causality to the number of dimensions the human mind is capable of tracking with symbols. That’s why math fails at the very small and very large: we run out of things to average into points (positional names). a) Eric does not grasp the foundations of mathematics which is why he can’t discern its limits. b) He doesn’t address that wolfram’s new continuous computational math is more likely correct, and more likely to solve the underlying problem. Or, that above and beyond wolfram’s continued use of point’s and vectors there is a geometric version of his work that doesn’t have the problem of time and sequence – although wolfram might yet discover it c) Or that Eric’s deduction (from his lectures) was a failure – he hasn’t solved it and no one has even chosen to run with it. d) Or why Eric is right that economics is ‘using the wrong calculus’ but that even if they use the right calculus the information doesn’t exist to calculate with, and they still aren’t accounting for changes in all capital so we’re in far worse shape than what the productivity data shows. e) That the interesting mathematics in economics is the emergency of symmetries that could compensate for the lack of information – at least at the macro scale. b) Brett panders to him. But for example, look at the conservative crab-bucket dragging all others down, and the Jewish ant-ladder to help people up. That’s the point of heaping of undue praise (creating undeserved reputations) versus critique (undermining deserved reputations). This is why Dialectic = Pilpul = Gossiping = UnderminingSOLUTIONS I don’t even like attention. It’s just necessary to do my work. But my work is in pursuit of a set of solutions, and my body of work a set of solutions to the great problems of history: the formal logic of language, psychology, sociology – the human, sentient, or soft sciences. And its embodiment in law. That solution includes the means of outlawing Jewish specialization in undermining by false promises that bait people into hazard for profit (including attention and status) until plausible deniability that they function as an organized crime family profiting from civilizational capital destruction is no longer tenable. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute

    Notice that  Kevin Macdonald (Psychology, Science, Intellectual History) @TOOEdit , Ricardo Duchesne (Sociology, Philosophy, Intellectual History) @DuchesneRicardo, and I, Curt Doolittle (Economics, Law, Computability) @CurtDoolittle all arrive at the same basic conclusion from different fields over the course of thirty years. Not because we set out to solve that problem but once we discovered it we were astounded by the impact – that the Abrahamic Method of Deceit is as powerful a method of lying as the Aristotelian Method of Testimony is a powerful method of speaking the truth.