Form: Critique

  • Philosophy: Continental Imaginative Literature(positive) Priests Vs Analytic Critical Law(negative) Judges


    [P]hilosophers function as intellectual police, detectives, judges, and sometimes executioners. Although I have had literary (nonsense) philosophers criticize me for the position, endlessly.

    If philosophy does not consist in the study of how to speak the truth by discovering how we avoid error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience, and deceit, then it is just fiction-writing that conflates religion, literature, and pseudoscience.

    Just as judges may discover general rules (natural law) by solving problems of conflict; and just as physicists discover general rules of determinism by solving problems of extending perception (physical laws); our philosophers discover general rules of reason (rational laws) by solving problems of error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience and deceit.

    Our function is to police the intellectual sphere for error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience, and deceit.

    I am not sure we can classify literary dreamers, hypothesizers, inventors as philosophers. We do. But they give us a bad name.

    This is the correct positioning of the philosophical disciplines. Aspirational Literary Religon and Critical Analytic Law.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Philosophy of Aristocracy
    The Propertarian Institute

  • TALK FOR SPREADING LIES (staying on message: different institutions for differen

    https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-black-race-judged-off-of-its-least-successful-members/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv&share=eee78e6cHARSH TALK FOR SPREADING LIES

    (staying on message: different institutions for different distributions)

    It isn’t. It’s judged by the dominance of its race in failures of education, crime, civic behavior, business achievement, intellectual achievement, and artistic and literary achievement.

    The east Asian and western Europeans have aggressively killed off their lower classes through winters, starvation, enslavement, hanging, beheading, war, and a very severe justice system for thousands of years. The rest of the world has not. So the size of the underclasses in the black, Arabic, Turkic, Hispanic, and southeast Asian worlds is far higher a percentage than in the more northern climes. West and east were eugenic civilizations. Rice is a brutal system requiring disciplined work 360 days a year. Western winters are unforgiving.

    We know the reasons for black underclass achievement: (a) the disproportionate size of the black underclass below 85 IQ, and the comparatively small sizes of its middle and upper middle classes, and total absence of an upper class, (b) earlier and more rapid maturity accompanied by the same level of hormones, leading to impulsivity and aggression, (c) lower verbal intelligence, (d) lower aggregate intelligence, (e) destruction of the black family by the progressive programs of the Johnson administration’s Great Society programs of the 1960’s – his attempt to mimic soviet resettlement programs from villages to urban areas without grasping the vast differences in Russian and black human capital. (f) the attempt to educate different races that mature more or less, more quickly or more slowly, at the same age under the same conditions. Educate black and Hispanic men in what equates to military training and you will get good men out of it. You cannot ask humans in their youth to fight hormones that intense. Educating pliable Asians and less pliable and more physical whites at the same rates is equally destructive. We can start Asians and east Asians one to two years earlier than whites, and it’s arguable that we should provide two more years for Hispanics and three for blacks. It prevents schools from tailoring programs to the genetic needs of the children.

    As a gentleman, I will try to refrain from chastising you for posing this question as a lie, in order to perpetuate a lie, for the purpose of causing people to believe a lie. But if lying on matters of public policy were punishable, you’d be incarcerated for this one.

    We get nowhere by lying that we’re equally distributed. It’s liberal lies of equality that prevent us from developing institutions that support the needs of different genetic organisms, with different rates of maturity, different degrees of maturity, and different sizes of underclass.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    My job is to prevent lies in public discourse that prevent us from coming to compromises on policies.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-16 15:09:00 UTC

  • My opponent demonstrates that he prefers rule by ashkenazi lies, then rule by an

    My opponent demonstrates that he prefers rule by ashkenazi lies, then rule by anglo truth.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-15 18:35:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765255564716871680

    Reply addressees: @JaimelHemphill @pdamra @mmurraypolitics

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765243987569541125


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @JaimelHemphill @pdamra @dmataconis @mmurraypolitics Very few lives matter, and empirically, they’re predominantly white and Ashkenazi.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/765243987569541125


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @JaimelHemphill @pdamra @dmataconis @mmurraypolitics Very few lives matter, and empirically, they’re predominantly white and Ashkenazi.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/765243987569541125

  • cannot respond and answer objections as fast as the liars can manufacture falseh

    cannot respond and answer objections as fast as the liars can manufacture falsehoods (critique).


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-15 18:30:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765254456464252928

    Reply addressees: @JaimelHemphill @pdamra @mmurraypolitics

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765245271471120385


    IN REPLY TO:

    @JaimelHemphill

    @curtdoolittle @pdamra @dmataconis @mmurraypolitics Don’t worry- We’re too evolved to treat you like your ancestors treated us.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765245271471120385

  • PINKER’S CRITICISM OF TALEB IS TALEB’S DOING BUT… Taleb is right, pinker is wr

    PINKER’S CRITICISM OF TALEB IS TALEB’S DOING BUT…

    Taleb is right, pinker is wrong, but Taleb makes his arguments to general principles rather than operational explanations.

    This is why we must have empiricism AND operationalism in scientific assertions.

    This is why people like Taleb must work top down (empirically) and others like me must work bottom up (operationally). And why opportunities to do both, like Darwin’s, are the product of novel data collection at much larger (logarithmic?) scale.

    I suspect that because of our status differences Taleb and I could not work together on this, and no one will see our different missions as the same as that of Hayek (long run law) and Mises (medium run finance), or that Taleb and I are working on the same problem that Poincaré, Mises, Hayek, Popper, Brouwer, and Bridgman failed to solve: how to we separate science from pseudoscience, once we are talking about stochastic systems at very great scale? What happened when teh industrial revolution hit, and we needed to move from operational accounting to correlative statistics, yet could not bridge the technological gap of testing our statistical statements like we do our theoretical statements. Especially when there is profound incentive to use financialization to accumulate risk and spend down capital precisely because at such scale operations are imperceptible to us.

    We boil the frog.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-14 22:01:00 UTC

  • The reason #Quora s__ks? The hired bots that repeatedly post BS and illogical qu

    The reason #Quora s__ks? The hired bots that repeatedly post BS and illogical questions in poor English. Hindufication hasn’t helped either.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-11 06:33:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/763624365535666176

  • Why Are You Marxist?

    Marxism is akin to fantasy role playing. Its cute but it was pseudoscience when he wrote it, and literary fantasy taught only in the literature departments.

    There are no marxist economists any longer.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-are-you-Marxist

  • Hollywood just needs to close up shop. Seriously. It’s like the lame 60’s and 70

    Hollywood just needs to close up shop. Seriously. It’s like the lame 60’s and 70’s again. Where they are throwing old formulas at walls hoping the spaghetti script sticks.

    I mean Seriously. Do you really think the current ‘Hollywood model’ is organizationally any different from the old studio model other than the studios don’t carry the capital costs of holding actors?

    It’s literally embarrassing to watch most of these movies.

    I mean, how do you f___k up this kind of content?

    Meanwhile, we’ve got Preacher, Game of Thrones, Vikings….

    Until you start making movies for domestic markets you will find it impossible to make heroes.

    The hero’s journey is the basis of all stories: transcendence.

    International markets can’t do that without (a) hatred of white people, (b) invading aliens. (Where aliens are just a proxy for colonialism by white people.)

    Family doesn’t work in the west. We’re not small minded enough.

    Heroes are political creatures.

    And it’s the rest of the world that’s shit, not us.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-07 08:41:00 UTC

  • LITERARY PHILOSOPHY IS FICTION It’s probably about time to classify Continental

    LITERARY PHILOSOPHY IS FICTION

    It’s probably about time to classify Continental Philosophy as little more than a bridge between historical and fictional literature.

    – operational documentation,

    – descriptive historical literature,

    – propositional philosophical literature,

    – authoritarian psudoscientific literature

    – authoritarian supernatural mythical literature

    – escapist fanciful fictional literature,

    – parable

    – poetry


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-05 07:18:00 UTC

  • Here: Rothbardianism has nothing to do with liberty, and everything to do with i

    Here: Rothbardianism has nothing to do with liberty, and everything to do with immorality.#tcot #tlot #nrx #altright https://t.co/eq6kjW9W4w


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-04 17:09:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/761247767968772096