Curt Doolittle

Form: Critique

  • (When I use the term “88’er” I’m referring exclusively to the people who try to

    (When I use the term “88’er” I’m referring exclusively to the people who try to justify the hitler cult who lack intelligence to do so, and rapidly resort to insults and spamming when their sophism runs into the brick wall of reason, logic, science, and the institutions necessary to produce and maintain a polity its economy, and its commons.)

    Basically I’m ok with anything as long as it’s not false or impossible. And for a polity, it’s economy, and its commons, the chickens come home to roost eventually. The less more correspondent your rules of decidability, the more survivable and durable your polity, economy, and commons. The less correspondent your rules of decidability the less survivable and durable your polity, economy, and commons.

    NSDAP was a non-correspondent momentum play – an attempt to create a religion (cult) to use remaining property-in-toto, to create an empire that would provide survivability where the status quo would not. That I agree that this aesthetic was beautiful, and the strategy was a brilliant use of new media, propaganda, and irreproducible time-and-place, is very different from saying it was either survivable or repeatable. The Nazis innovated using new technology to take advantage of time and place. If you want to create a new aesthetic in this time and place, you need to innovate in aesthetic, use new technology, that will produce similar ends in this time and place.

    IMHO this is not possible because NS was a working class movement that competed against the communist working class movement. And frankly we no longer possess such a working class, nor one that can be motivated by such means, in this time and place. The era where we could rally the peasantry, rally the working class has been gone, and we are left with the opposite vulnerability – others are rallying the under-and-immigrant-classes (the opposition) using the strategy the NS made use of.

    Right now we have a full spectrum of the New Right emerging with a language for every class. And as is usual in the west, instead of speaking with one class voice (the working class under NS, the peasantry under christianity), we are speaking with all voices of all our classes.

    Yet, each class makes the mistake that their language is sufficient for the motivation of other classes. They live in their own cognitively biased world. And so we may in fact need various languages of inspiration and motivation for each of the classes – I certainly don’t intend to inspire the working class, only to fight for his interests in my own classes.

    So rallying around a singe ideology is very difficult. And it will be difficult until we have a solution and a plan of achieving it. But when we have a solution and a plan of achieving it, each class can modify it’s message to support the plan or some variation of it.

    This is what is preventing the right from coalescing into a single movement. It’s why the current administration bought us time, but may not have been as helpful as being backed against the wall as the left now feels.

    I am certain my solution of modifying the constitution will produce the ends we desire over a fairly short if not rapid period of time. And it will work – not because it will produce a shared belief – but because it will prevent the formation of competing solutions, and it will use the same selfish market incentives in the prosecution of anti-westerners as we westerners have used to create our other ‘markets in everything’.

    Just as simpletons talk about people, average people talk about events, above average people talk about ideas – in revolutionary context, simpletons talk about beliefs (if we all believe or value x), average people talk about education or policy (if we can only get x done), above average people talk about institutions and incentives (if we only do x the rest will follow).

    There may exist some other possible means. But as far as I can tell, we have lost our numbers due to the intentional invasion of the west by the underclasses for the purpose of creating demand for authority, for the purpose of ending western aristocratic civilization, and the great experiment of the anglo saxon peoples in contractualism, sovereignty, and rule of internally consistent externally correspondent reciprocally moral, Natural Law. The only system of self governance that makes possible Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom, and Subsidy.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-12 08:33:00 UTC

  • THE COURT’S WINGS “Disheartening and demoralizing,” wailed Judge Neil Gorsuch of

    http://www.wnd.com/2017/02/trump-must-break-judicial-power/#bmcjs7wc3SkovCA6.99CLIP THE COURT’S WINGS

    “Disheartening and demoralizing,” wailed Judge Neil Gorsuch of President Trump’s comments about the judges seeking to overturn his 90-day ban on travel to the U.S. from the Greater Middle East war zones.

    What a wimp. Did our future justice break down crying like Sen. Chuck Schumer? Sorry, this is not Antonin Scalia. And just what horrible thing had our president said?

    A “so-called judge” blocked the travel ban, said Trump. And the arguments in court, where 9th Circuit appellate judges were hearing the government’s appeal, were “disgraceful.” “A bad student in high school would have understood the arguments better.”

    Did the president disparage a couple of judges? Yep.

    Yet compare his remarks to the tweeted screeds of Elizabeth Warren after her Senate colleague, Jeff Sessions, was confirmed as attorney general.

    Sessions, said Warren, represents “radical hatred.” And if he makes “the tiniest attempt to bring his racism, sexism & bigotry” into the Department of Justice, “all of us” will pile on.

    Now this is hate speech. And it validates Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s decision to use Senate rules to shut her down.

    These episodes reveal much about America 2017.

    They reflect, first, the poisoned character of our politics. The language of Warren – that Sessions is steeped in “racism, sexism & bigotry” – echoes the ugliest slander of the Hillary Clinton campaign, where she used similar words to describe Trump’s “deplorables.”

    Like the reporting you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from WND.com, America’s independent news network.

    Such language, reflecting as it does the beliefs of one-half of America about the other, rules out any rapprochement in America’s social or political life. This is pre-civil war language.

    For how do you sit down and work alongside people you believe to be crypto-Nazis, Klansmen and fascists? Apparently, you don’t. Rather, you vilify them, riot against them, deny them the right to speak or to be heard.

    And such conduct is becoming common on campuses today.

    As for Trump’s disparagement of the judges, only someone ignorant of history can view that as frightening.

    Thomas Jefferson not only refused to enforce the Alien & Sedition Acts of President John Adams, his party impeached Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase, who had presided over one of the trials.

    Jackson defied Chief Justice John Marshall’s prohibition against moving the Cherokees out of Georgia to west of the Mississippi, where, according to the Harvard resume of Sen. Warren, one of them bundled fruitfully with one of her ancestors, making her part Cherokee.

    When Chief Justice Roger Taney declared that President Abraham Lincoln’s suspension of the writ of habeas corpus violated the Constitution, Lincoln considered sending U.S. troops to arrest the chief justice.

    FDR proposed adding six justices to emasculate a Supreme Court of the “nine old men” he reviled for having declared some New Deal schemes unconstitutional.

    President Eisenhower called his Supreme Court choices Earl Warren and William Brennan two of the “worst mistakes” he made as president. History bears Ike out. And here we come to the heart of the matter.

    Whether the roll-out of the president’s temporary travel ban was ill-prepared or not, and whether one agrees or not about which nations or people should be subjected to extreme vetting, the president’s authority in the matter of protecting the borders and keeping out those he sees as potentially dangerous is universally conceded.

    That a district judge would overrule the president of the United States on a matter of border security in wartime is absurd.

    When politicians don black robes and seize powers they do not have, they should be called out for what they are – usurpers and petty tyrants. And if there is a cause upon which the populist right should unite, it is that elected representatives and executives make the laws and rule the nation. Not judges, and not justices.

    Indeed, one of the mightiest forces that has birthed the new populism that imperils the establishment is that unelected justices like Warren and Brennan, and their progeny on the bench, have remade our country without the consent of the governed – and with never having been smacked down by Congress or the president.

    Consider. Secularist justices de-Christianized our country. They invented new rights for vicious criminals as though criminal justice were a game. They tore our country apart with idiotic busing orders to achieve racial balance in public schools. They turned over centuries of tradition and hundreds of state, local and federal laws to discover that the rights to an abortion and same-sex marriage were there in Madison’s Constitution all along. We just couldn’t see them.

    Trump has warned the judges that if they block his travel ban, and this results in preventable acts of terror on American soil, they will be held accountable. As rightly they should.

    Meanwhile, Trump’s White House should use the arrogant and incompetent conduct of these federal judges to make the case not only for creating a new Supreme Court, but for Congress to start using Article III, Section 2, of the Constitution – to restrict the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, and to reclaim its stolen powers.

    A clipping of the court’s wings is long overdue.

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/02/trump-must-break-judicial-power/#bmcjs7wc3SkovCA6.99

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-09 20:27:00 UTC

  • fake propaganda just like all russian history. all of southern russia spoke and

    fake propaganda just like all russian history. all of southern russia spoke and was culturally ukrainian. The muscovites incremetnally conquered the golden horde as they weakend, expanded and destroyed novgorod which was the only civilized part of that world, then expanded west and stole from china, then expandes south and stole from ukrainians, then expanded east and stole western ‘ukraine’ from poland and lithuania. then expanded east and drove the eastern europe and part of germany into poverty that they still have not recovered from.

    Russians are a cancer to christiandom becuase they are, at heart, sill low trust peoples unable to eliminate corruptoin that the catholic countrires have been more successful in eliminating and the protestant countrires have been MOST successful in eliminating.

    Russia has no economy. It has a mlitary funded by the manufacture and sale of petrolium products, and the manufactuiore use, and expansion of military hardware.

    Economically, Russia is smaller than Italy. It is a poor, backward country slowly attempting to reform the corruption of steppe civilization, but lacking the cultural means of doing so: TELL THE TRUTH, HOLD OTHERS ACCOUNTABLE FOR TELLING THE TRUTH, TAKE NOTHING NOT PAID FOR, PROTECT WOMEN AND THE WEAK. AND DEFEAT AND KILL THE BARBARIANS.

    Russia’s destiny as a steppe people is to rule southward, not east or westward. The lands to the west of moscow shall never be part of russia, becuase they shall never be part of the steppe, nor ever be culturally steppe people.

    the decision is made. stop lying to yourselves. The west is committing suicide. But Russia drinks hemlock every day out of her own glass of mongol nihilism.

    Take back turkey, and crush the muslims. That is russia’s only achievable destiny. Becuase once russia has ownership of muslim lands, and retains christianity, she will control more than half of the cheaply obtainable oil reserves.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-04 12:20:00 UTC

  • All the arguments i hear (a) rely on justificationism (excuse making), not falsi

    All the arguments i hear (a) rely on justificationism (excuse making), not falsificationism (warranty of due diligence), (b) seek to preserve investments in conflation – just as all religions do, (c) confuse the resolution of disputes in matters of conflict (truth) with the communication and ideation and cooperation ( meaning ).

    I”m in the same place as the men of the scientific enlightenment – right through darwin: instead of a church of excuse making mystics, an academy of excuse making rationalists. Neither grasps that they are just making excuses in order to rally people with meaning, in pursuit of power which they cannot construct through either force or productivity. They sell lies. The academy like the church profits from lies. There may be some truth amidst the lies, but this does mean the lies are not more harmful than the truth is beneficial.

    I think humans have been lied to so often that they cannot imagine a world via-negativa (resolving differences, deciding, truth) and via positiva (organizing, teaching, meaning). They cannot imagine a perfect law and a perfect literature would lead to a perfect, transcendent man.

    As imperfect, they cannot. Or rather, with such perfection, those who have lesser talents could not rally on truth, force, and remuneration. And so lies are the way that they comensate for inadequacy in their attempts to inspire themsevles in the face of evidence of inferiority, and rally others in the face of their inferiority.

    So yes. Maybe truth is for transcendent man, aristocracy and gods, and maybe the half-man requires conflation and lies – he is not transcendent enough yet – still a human animal. Domesticated. Perhaps a freeman. But not able to join the aristocracy.

    unable to join the gods.

    ( did ‘ya see what I did there? truth, myth, and literature. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-30 21:35:00 UTC

  • THE LABEL CHANGED. BUT THE NEW RIGHT REMAINS —[Cernovich] is also a pathologic

    THE LABEL CHANGED. BUT THE NEW RIGHT REMAINS

    —[Cernovich] is also a pathological liar.– anon..

    No. That criticism doesn’t stand.

    The alt-right was changed from a self identifying label for all reactionaries, to a left-label for WN using Spencer in short order. Just as the left intended.

    That’s why (Me), Cernovich, and PJW, switched to ‘New Right’. To separate from the third rail. I started more than a year ago because I saw it coming. But this year, as it became obvious, people migrated. And we needed that name to stick. Because our enemy is not just the left, but the establishment ‘old right’.

    Compared to the Alt’s, The “New Right” works on advancing the good rather than criticizing the bad. This technique is always superior. Arguing agaist something is not he same as arguing for something. Arguing for specific policy (rule of law) is even better. But in truth, we must argue using ALL methods, since people obtain sentimental meaning from the arguments that they understand. It takes more knowledge to argue for something, and more knowledge to argue for a specific set of institutional changes, but we all ‘feel’ and will act in favor of what we can understand.

    And so ALL OF US had to deal with this change in label given the Spencer-division. Mike isn’t unique, and punching right on nonsense isn’t helpful.

    Here. Look how many ‘languages’ we are speaking in now:

    Spencer is working on WN, (wn)

    The green frog crew is working on ridicule. (alt)

    RamzPaul is working on pop criticism (alt)

    PJW is working on media criticism. (new)

    Moly is working on pure education. (lagging but getting there)

    Mike is working “within the system” (new)

    I’m working on ‘the next system’. (new)

    This movement covers the spectrum from separatism, to ridicule, to criticism, to education, to reformation, to revolution. And covers the classes from lower working to intellectuals.

    And that’ exactly what we NEED to do. No everyone is capable of the full spectrum of understanding or the full spectrum of arguments.

    The middle will, and the lower middle will, always hold the numbers, and provide the upper middle provide leadership. The bottom provides the soldiers, and the top provides the political solutions.

    THIS IS HOW REVOLUTIONS ARE MADE: FULL MOBILIZATION.

    We don’t need ‘one-ness’ in argument. We need one ambition: CHANGE. The change you fight for will depend on your beleive in what can be accomplished. Some wthin the process (evidence is contrary) and some using rebellion to overwhelm the existing process (anglos have this history of constitutional revision in times of change), and some of us with revolution so that the threat of chaos will force the existing process of change. and some want to burn the house down and see what rises from the Joker’s ashes. (That strategy always seems to fail).

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    ( Mike Cernovich, Richard Spencer, The RAMZPAUL Show, Stefan Molyneux, Paul Joseph Watson, Eli Harman )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 13:15:00 UTC

  • I don’t expect anything intelligent, honest, ethical or moral from someone who t

    I don’t expect anything intelligent, honest, ethical or moral from someone who thinks, looks and acts like a goat-f_cker. I am just using him as a chimp in a circus. The dog cannot refrain from licking his ass. (((Gossips))) can’t help it any more than a woman can bear embarrassment. So they double down over and over again. it’s an animal reaction. You just have to marvel at the consistency of their impulses. And how easy it is to trick them into verbal ass-licking in public.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 08:46:00 UTC

  • THE GENERATION DOOMED TO THE ISLAND OF MISFIT CODE (tech stuff) (captain obvious

    THE GENERATION DOOMED TO THE ISLAND OF MISFIT CODE

    (tech stuff) (captain obvious) (venting) (typescript)(omg) (rant)

    Do you know what it will cost to rewrite this generation of code? omg.

    This is like polluting the water. or land or sea. it’s freaking expensive to clean up. WAAAAY expensive to clean up.

    You know why norms are a good thing? They stop us from doing stupid sh-t over and over again and exporting the cost of our stupid sh-t to others and society.

    norms develop for a reason: to encapsulate knowledge so that we don’t export costs.

    ANYWAY….

    I am not happy with the ES6 syntax structure, which is a sort of half-achieved bit of nonsense.

    const Foo = () => ({

    bar() {

    console.log(‘bar’);

    }

    });

    Are you kidding me? God invented compilers for a reason. I used to write in IBM360, and 6809E assembly code, and it was less prone to syntax errors. lol. We need LINTERS? Are you fking kidding? We need to write how many layers of tests to compensate for sh-t languages and operating systems (browsers)? I have how many plugins to compensate for sh-t technology?

    Do you have any idea how hard it is to debug all this sh-t code out there? omg….. it’s like we graduate people from university who create code movements without grasping that coding is a TRADE, and this shit trickles down into the masses of butt-crack programmers out there. So what they do at the top 1% of companies with the top 20% of tech graduates is very different from what happens in the rest of the damned world. OMG. And you thought the Y2K thing was a joke.. Back then we made a 100M+ a year business out of converting that sh-t … and you can freaking READ it.

    Look. Programming can be operational (imperative) or functional (declarative), and the rest is design patterns. The difference between these two styles is not aesthetic. It’s whether you’re working on calculating the rotations of positions of stars / generating a 3d world at 200fps, versus writing an application program for humans to operate and maintain. Yeah. It’s good that google and FB need to generate much less use of memory (functional programming) but they are creating their own LANGUAGES (Dart). Meanwhile we have a trove of idiots trying to use a 40 year old design pattern (game engine with state engine) with new-age names (react/flux/redux/mobx) written as a hack on top of a langauge totally unsuited for it.

    OMG. Passing functions is one thing. Conflating functions and parameters is something else.

    NET/NET: If you are saving memory by obscuring readability and information hiding, then you are working with sh-t technology. you are not smart. you are not cunning. you are not creative. you are just f-king ignorant. (sigh)

    And yeah. I know. Programmers can milk money out of all sorts of organizations whenever morons are stupid enough to spend money on a ‘hot new technology’. Yes, I understand we are making a lot of money because FB/GOOGLE/MSFT are exporting internal costs on the entire freaking world. If that isn’t enough to quadruple their taxes I don’t know what is….

    CAPTAIN OBVIOUS

    But I will stick with the rather obvious statements:

    – calculations/transformations = functional

    – pure functions = stateless = good.

    – nouns = object oriented / (prototype or inherited)

    – verbs = message queues better than events.

    – adjectives = callbacks = really,really, trouble me, prefer passing references to functions and explictly calling them.

    – grammar = command processor (react ‘reducers)

    – memories = data structures = databases = (react ‘stores’)

    – context = globals should be encapsulated in an object and passed pas pointers to consumers, yes.

    – responsibilities = services

    – readability = verbose

    – problem = memory management and threading

    – design pattern for apps where the renderer is separate from the state and logic is well known. we call it ‘games’

    – Pascal’s functions within functions was an improvement. Classes were an improvement but inheritance was not. Composable classes replacing class with protoype inheritance is an improvement.

    – passing pointers, values, types, functions, objects (types+functions), classes (types, functions, logic), is all good stuff. Passing ‘props’ (undocumented parameters) is fucking insanity. The fact that we rarely know which of these we’re passing is the damned curse of softly typed programming. It’s not like we have to make a binary choice between typed and manually-cast, vs untyped. We can type and cast implictly right?

    – MVC was a stupid fking idea. just like xml was a stupid fking idea. I mean, why do we have to repeat stupid fking ideas in every generation? omg…. those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it, and f-ck over all of us who are NOT ignorant of history.

    – all the test harnesses we are creating are compensation for weaknesses in the language (js), and the compiler (ack), and the operating system (the browser).

    – functional programming syntax in JS is as disaster prone as the sh_t idiots wrote in perl. I mean… wtf? Seriously?

    – What you see in programming today is that people are writing code that compensates for a weaknesses in the compiler (browser).

    – Writing ‘compliers’ that reduce to native JS is fine, because there is too high a cost to decomposition of a higher level language at runtime. But then there is no value to the current extensions to js.

    – Virtual Dom (a local db using pub-sub to renderers) is a good solution but hacking it together like this is ridiculously expensive, fragile, and unmaintainable. Thankfully third world devs are cheap.

    – The browser and JS consortiums are now an impediment rather than advantage. And they are exporting enormous costs into the industry by their failure to move at a faster pace.

    – My suspicion is that everyone (with time) will figure this out and bypass js, turning it into the equivalent of machine code for the browser. Typescript/Babel/Webpack functions as a map of the future. The problem is WE ARE NOT WRITING IN A HIGHER LEVEL LANGUAGE, but a low level language (js) that is syntactically (grammatically) weak. So you can reliably compile it.

    I mean basically everyone is trying to use a pretty syntactically weak language (js) to superset that syntactically weak language, because it is the only option we have for the browser, because the browser data structure (the DOM), and the language (js), are archaic.

    react -> flux is largely correct.

    But the goddamn hacks it makes use of are just unbelieveable.

    omg…. this is gonna be not only the snowflake generation but the flaky-code generation.

    OMG….

    I mean… PROGRAMMING = A GRAMMAR.

    When you TEACH PROGRAMMING, start with english grammar (noun, verb, adverb, sentence, etc)

    Do not start with maethmatics.

    Math is for the descxription of constant relations constructed from transformations.

    algorithms describe transformations.

    programming is not mathematics (calculation of constant relations)

    it is instruction: SPEECH

    OMG.

    I’m going to drink some whiskey.

    really….. really.

    I …. I can’t take any more stupid today.

    too… much…. stupid…..

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-25 15:46:00 UTC

  • THE END OF HOPE AND THE VIRTUE OF VIOLENCE —‘yadda yadda yadda, nonsense, nons

    THE END OF HOPE AND THE VIRTUE OF VIOLENCE

    —‘yadda yadda yadda, nonsense, nonsense, nonsense, shaming, shaming shaming, straw man, straw man, straw man”— Aaron Werner (via Discus)

    If you are ‘hopeful’ you try to inform, and then persuade.

    if you have given up hope, you can try to buy them off.

    If you cannot buy them off, you can only use violence to stop them.

    I changed the discourse from hope of requesting Liberty by faith in informing and persuading, to the hopelessness of persuasion, and the imposition of Sovereignty, by the organize use of violence to deny parasitism by all means.

    We are all but creatures of our genes. You, your genes, we, ours. We are no longer hopeful. We are no longer willing to tolerate the high cost of hopefulness that you and the minority of men like you, and the majority of women who you are like, will learn.

    We will end parasitism via the commons just as we have ended it in the market. We will deny others the possibility of majority tyranny, and force those who benefit from parasitism by the government, or parasitism by free riding on the west’s commons, back into the markets for the private and common .

    If you fool me once with Pilpul, divine command, and christianity, shame on me. If you fool me twice with marxism, libertinism, neo-conservatism, the pseudo-rationalism of critical theory, and the pseudosciences of boaz, marx, freud, cantor, and mises, then same on me.

    The experiment in tolerance is over. Maxwell, Darwin, Spencer, Nietzsche, and Davenport were right. Time to return to our ancient occupation of domesticating the animals (which I assume includes you) for fun and profit in an effort to create peers rather than parasites.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 16:54:00 UTC

  • WHY IS KANT UNFORIVABLE? —“Specifically what about Kant is unforgivable?”—Be

    WHY IS KANT UNFORIVABLE?

    —“Specifically what about Kant is unforgivable?”—Benjamin Thurston

    Inventing pseudorationalism that (1) provided an excuse to circumvent the anglo invention of empiricism, (2) created the possibility for the ‘pseudo-rational, post-mystical, fantasy moral literature that we call continental philosophy”, and (3) gave Marx and the cosmopolitans the means of verbal deception necessary to fool so many people by loading, framing, and overloading. (4) and led to the postmoderns, critical theory / political correctness movement.

    In other words, by attempting to restate christianity in pseudorational terms, he created the next generation of mysticism: pseudorationalism as the subsequent means of literary deception, which was then taken up by the jews (cosmopolitans) who combined it with jewish law (poly ethical poly logical) to create pseudoscience: boaz, marx, freud, cantor, mises, {the frankfurt school}, rothbard(libertinism), and strauss(neoconism).

    In other words, he created a technical revolution in religion as a way to lie by suggestion. A way that it has taken me most of my life to counter.

    The british worked so hard to create the scientific enlightenment by observing the record of empirical law, and tried to restore our ancient order (natural law), and then Kant comes along and restates christianity in a new form of mysticism before the empirical project had been completed.

    (PS: It appears that marx knew he was lying by saying something on the order of “…but I have written it all as dialectic (what we call Pilpul) so I can’t be held accountable if I’m wrong…”. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 14:06:00 UTC

  • DOES ANY ANGLO PHILOSOPHY ACTUALLY EXIST? The German philosophers conflate every

    DOES ANY ANGLO PHILOSOPHY ACTUALLY EXIST?

    The German philosophers conflate everything. Their only difference from levantine mystics is that they use platonism, pseudorationalism instead of mysticism and theology. And the jewish philosophers avoided deism and used pseudorationalism, pseudolegalism, and pseudoscience – trying to one-up the Germans. (Really, that’s what actually happened.)

    The anglo model asks that we deflate: law of nature (physical laws), informational laws (logic), natural laws (cooperation), history, literature, mythology, and theology – and we ignore the dreams.

    To this extent, no anglo PHILOSOPHY exists – or has in a very long time. Anglos practice the Deflationary Law of Information. Possibly for no other reason than their long history with the common law.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-17 10:43:00 UTC