Form: Critique

  • Literature of Growing Up: Rothbard, Friedman, Sowell, Hayek. (and Me) Grownups s

    Literature of Growing Up: Rothbard, Friedman, Sowell, Hayek. (and Me)

    Grownups should ignore Rothbard. He’s talking in children’s stories. Parables. Silly stuff. If you wanna read teenager stories read Friedman. He is as close to correct as I know how to get. If you wanna read junior college stories read Sowell. He talks about the rest of the society not just the economy. If you want to read university stories read hayek. He talks about civilizations. If you want post-graduate work, you’re gonna have to wait for me, ’cause it’s gonna take that to make conservatism and libertarianism into a persuasive science rather than a moral literature.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-16 08:33:00 UTC

  • UP – WE **WANT** WARLORD RULE – THE MILITIA Warlords MUST take over. That’s the

    https://mises.org/library/wouldnt-warlords-take-overGROW UP – WE **WANT** WARLORD RULE – THE MILITIA

    https://mises.org/library/wouldnt-warlords-take-over

    Warlords MUST take over. That’s the whole point. The question is only their number. A militia of warlords constitutes a distributed dictatorship under which only markets governed by natural law are possible.

    Anarchism? A lot of optimistic bullshit. Go live in Ukraine. in Belarus. In Russia (at least outside of moscow or st Petersburg.) Ukraine (the borderland) is where Jewish separatism of Rothbard was envisioned, under the protection of lithuanian, or polish, or russian empires, allowed financial and commercial gangsterism, while prohibiting physical retaliation. It was a system of organized predation upon the people just as today’s financialism consists of organized predation upon the people while preventing juridical defense from it, and physical retaliation against it.

    And that’s Ukraine today. The pretense of order. But 40+ Gangsters (warlords) we call Oligarchs (Private Property Rulership) with enough money and arms to (a) stack and buy the courts, (b) stack and buy the government, who have their own militaries, and who cannot be displaced, because they can too easily turn the rest of ukraine into a civil war zone like the east, leaving the only option Russian invasion and enforced order – which was exactly the plan all along.

    The reason ukraine is weak, is that it has no militia. Period.

    Rothbardianism consists of nothing but optimistic juvenile platitudes sold to reproductively, socially, economically uncompetitive males, as a wishful separatist movement, so that they might beg not to contribute to a commons that makes the market order possible, and instead, may parasitically exploit it without contribution. ie: separatism. Rothbardian ghetto ethics of intersubjectively verifiable property

    There is only one source of liberty: the organized use of violence to obtain, hold, and advance territory, resources, population, institutions, and capital – by a militia of sufficient scale that they cannot be opposed by any cost effective means, or by any concentration of power. How is that possible: only under genetic, cultural, and institutional homogeneity.

    PERIOD.

    How do you create liberty (permission)? As a byproduct of creating sovereignty in fact. How do you create sovereignty in fact? By organizing a corporation (franchise) of warriors – all of whom obtain a share (dividend) from the market produced by their distributed dictatorship of individual rule.

    But those warriors must be kin or to prevent organization by other than kin selection. A genetically and culturally homogenous population in the ruling class – the militia – must exist for liberty to exist.

    Sorry. Thats western history in a nutshell.

    Rothbard was just a commons marxist (Free Rider) just like Marx was a private property free rider. Just as the Neocons are a political market free riders.

    Monarchy and nobility (aristocracy) didn’t oppress. They domesticated the animal man. And clearly failed to domesticate the borderlands – where parasitic separatists allied with the state to prey upon the people, while preventing their retaliation against them.

    So grow up. Libertarianism is for boys. Men fight. they take. They rule. They profit from rule. They profit from rule by the incremental suppression of every means of profit possible other than productive, fully informed warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of negative externality in the markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production of goods, services, and information, and production of commons, institutions, and political orders.

    Men fight. Boys beg from mommy and daddy authority of whatever scale they must.

    Men are sovereign in fact. Boys have a little pretense of liberty by permission.

    THUS ENDETH THE LESSON


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-15 17:02:00 UTC

  • ROTHBARDIANISM? BUILD A MODEL. GO AHEAD. THINK IT THRU. Build a model. Go ahead.

    ROTHBARDIANISM? BUILD A MODEL. GO AHEAD. THINK IT THRU.

    Build a model. Go ahead. Try it. You have an opinion. Prove that you’re not a fucking idiot.

    What will occur if you could manage to put 1000 rothbadians in a small city on a trade route, tomorrow, what would happen? model it out.

    1) it’s easy to find 1000 people to claim they are rothbardians.

    2) it’s IMPOSSIBLE to find 1000 people who DEMONSTRATE they are rothbardians.

    3) but lets assume for a minute that you can, by luck, get given some land along, say, the new silk road. And you want to set up a rothbardian society. How will you do that?

    Here is how your conversation will start: “if some rich person (please mommy or daddy), or some nation (please king, or government) will fund (pay me to play around) a libertarian order (a place where I can keep my meagre earnings outside of a major market) I will (I fantasize) move there (away from all the creature comforts of an empire and a mixed economy) to a place only other losers like me will go to, and feel good until we fail and blame it on other people who don’t come for not having our fortitude (subsidy).

    So, why do people come? What will they do? Why will they choose it over the alternatives? how will you create private defense, private, courts, private property, and how will your courts determine what private property, and what contract terms, they will rule in disputes over, and what not?

    How will you prevent a nearby city, state, or empire from boycotting you via trade barriers? how will you stop organized crime? How will you stop an influx of people who prey upon nearby cities, states, empires by violence, fraud, conversion, immigration, or fiancialization, or some other scheme?

    Why will WOMEN want to move there? or live there?

    If you can’t get 100 libertarianis to agree to the scope of non aggression, or the definition of private property, despite 50 years of trying, how will you get them to take real life and property and commercial risks together?

    In other words, how can you OPERATIONALIZE rothbardianism? How can you bring it into existence in the real world instead of the fantasy world of silly teenagers and immature young males?

    I mean, if you can’t operationalize your ideas, you (anyone) is just saying that youre stupid ignorant and fantasizing over hot girs on porn sites, right? I mean what’s the difference between envisioning yourself with some hot chick, envisioning yourself as some athlete, envisioning yourself as some warrior, envisioning yourself as economicallly successful, envisioning yourself as a leader of men, envisioning yourself as a politician, a king, a despot?

    I mean, if you can’t OPERATIONALIZE some objective and demonstrate that it’s at least POSSIBLE then you’re just masturbating to political porn the way young men masturbate to car porn, gun porn, chick porn. RIght?

    “I’m a libertarian” is, like “I’m a Marxist” just signaling that you masturbate to political porn unless you can state some strategy for operationally constructing what it is that you desire.

    I’m pretty smart and I CANNOT OPERATIONALLY CONSTRUCT A LIBERTARIAN ORDER. I CANNOT locate a candidate geographically, discover any incentives that would produce membership, discover sufficient means of organization to produce the minimum commons (rule of law, defense) discover a means of constructing sufficient comparative advantage that it is possible to attract and maintain population (particularly women). Or discover a means of preventing such a territory from being populated by raiders of nearby or remote markets who then seize power until the external markets prey upon them.

    I can’t do it. Tell me how it can be done. Show me people will do so. Show me rational incentives to do so. And the answer is, that you can’t. All yo ucan do is say “i would prefer to wok on the borderland where I exchange limited regulation and taxation for much lower standard of living and much higher opportunity costs – so high that I can only survive by parasitic remote subsistence on remote markets. Why? subsistence farming by an individual is fucking hard and libertarians aren’t exactly the hardest working folk you know.

    ROTHBARDIANISM IS NOTHING MORE JEWISH SEPARATIST PARASITISM sold to young ignorant men who have a touch of intelligence, but are of little associative, reproductive, commercial, military, and strategic value, precisely because there is something WRONG (undesirable) about them.

    it’s just that this parasitic argument, like marxism before it and christianty before it promises the impossible to people not smart enough to falsify that vast overloading and framing that the propaganda is constructed from.

    It sucks to admit you were played. That you’re not that smart. But libertarianism played a pretty good sized group of people. Not enough to make a political movement. But enough to make a cult for misfit boys.

    Grow the fuck up.

    Men fight. They kill. They destroy. They take. They rule. They profit from their rule. They decrease the cost of profiting from their rule. They profit more so.

    If’ you’re a free riding effeminate loser unwilling to fight, kill, destroy, take, rule, profit from taht rule, and build a civilization that constantly decreases the cost of profiting from that rule then you are just a fucking whinny little bitch.

    Lift. Run. Explosively Sprint. Read about war. get a weapon. And when the time comes be the first guy to sprint to an opportunity to fight, kill, destroy, take, and rule.

    Otherwise youre just a child. Not a man.

    Thus Endeth The Lesson.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-15 14:41:00 UTC

  • The judeo christian of the church constitutes a framing: a lie. WHy must you hav

    The judeo christian of the church constitutes a framing: a lie.

    WHy must you have that lie? Can’t you look at history as a greater story than the children’s story of the myths and superstitions? the chidren’s stories for the dim, the ignorant, and the impoverished?

    Why aren’t your own histories superior to those? They are.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 12:27:00 UTC

  • THE CHURCH FAILED AND CONTINUES TO FAIL How can you advocate christianity as a m

    THE CHURCH FAILED AND CONTINUES TO FAIL

    How can you advocate christianity as a market good (something that people want to believe), when it so clearly is failing to compete in the market?

    What do socialism and cultural marxism, and postmodernism sell that people prefer to buy over christianity?

    What does islam sell that people prefer to buy over socialism, cultural marxism postmodernism – as well as christianity?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 09:28:00 UTC

  • COMMUNIST? OK. WHERE IS THIS COMING FROM? —“Die you Communist bastard”— Blai

    COMMUNIST? OK. WHERE IS THIS COMING FROM?

    —“Die you Communist bastard”— Blaine Mack

    So, just how stupid, ignorant, and lazy would you have to be to call me a communist????

    Yesterday someone called me a SJW? WTF?????

    Where the f-ck do these people come from?????? lol

    I am as far right a libertarian as you can possibly be, without stepping over the line into fascism. And even then, I understand that fascism is necessary in times of voluntary transformation or involuntary warfare.

    Natural law = reciprocity.

    But to conduct reciprocity you must have something to trade. No matter how poor we are, we all have something to trade. What we have to trade is leaving one another’s attention, body, and property alone, and the preservation, maintenance, and improvement of the commons whether territorial, physical, normative, or institutional.

    HERE, DEFINE YOURSELF:

    What kind of anti-market activity do you prefer?

    – Fascism: anti-market for politics, commons, norms, and limited market for goods, services, and information

    – Libertarianism: anti-market for commons, politics, but market for norms, goods, services, information.

    – Libertinism: anti-market for norms,politics, but market for goods, services and information.

    – Classical Liberalism: markets for good services and information, with limited-market for commons.

    – Aristocracy: markets for everything except law and politics.

    – Democratic socialism: minimum markets for politics, commons, and private property.

    – Socialism: anti market for goods, services, and information

    – Communism: anti market for politics, commons, norms, goods, services, and information.

    CONSERVATIVE (MALE) Social Conservatives limit the market for goods, services, information, norms, commons, politics, to that which is EVIDENTIARY, and imposes no costs, requiring individuals develop agency and discipline – however they do so in archaic moral (childlike) language with a touch of economics thrown in.

    PROGRESSIVE (FEMALE) Social Progressives limit the market for goods services, information, norms, commons, and politics to that which is HYPOTHETICAL, and imposes any possible costs, therefore NOT requiring individuals to develop agency and discipline – however they do so in modern moral and pseudoscientific language.

    The frankfurt school modernized female discourse, but we have had no aristocratic school equivalent (until now) to modernize male language. Why? Uncomfortable Truths that ask us to pay the costs of discipline in pursuit of agency is harder (more expensive in the short term) than Comforting Lies that tell us to forgo the costs of discipline and agency in the short term in favor of consumption (indiscipline) in the short term.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine.

    ( PS: Did you see how I made use of full accounting of markets and political disciplines by using series, and then supply demand between the male and female curves? See? Methodology at work.)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 07:23:00 UTC

  • CRITICAL THEORY IS A CRITICISM WITHOUT A SOLUTION – THE INDUSTRIALIZATION OF STR

    CRITICAL THEORY IS A CRITICISM WITHOUT A SOLUTION – THE INDUSTRIALIZATION OF STRAW MAN ARGUMENTS

    —“Critical theory is no ideology by itself, it’s just a method to destroy value systems. It doesn’t really replace those values. Cultural Marxism is the girlfriend who always whines; if you ignore her everything is fine, otherwise she will leave you after some time.”—Daniel —“Critical theory is no ideology by itself, it’s just a method to destroy value systems. It doesn’t really replace those values. Cultural Marxism is the girlfriend who always whines; if you ignore her everything is fine, otherwise she will leave you after some time.”—Daniel Daniel SeisSeis


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 05:19:00 UTC

  • Um. Ukrainian Nazis? Please Don’t Signal Your Virtues Around Serious People.

    Apr 10, 2017 11:11am UKRAINIAN NAZIS? OMFG. ACTUALLY COMPARE THE BRITS TO THE NAZIS AND WHO WAS WORSE FOR OUR CIVILIZATION? —“I heard there were Nazi Sympathizers in the Ukrainian military. Is that true?”— omg. Listen. what kind of privilege do you have to live under to virtue signal on that scale? You’d have to be be entirely incognizant of the desperation of a people who live under pervasive corruption, russian paid-for corruption, an oligarchy (libertarians desire a return to) that is basically nothing more than organized crime syndicate, that pays for the government to keep the people in poverty. So here is how I (and others in ukraine) would translate your question: “What kind of ignorant, privileged, overweight, unfit, tv-watching, spoiled, effeminate idiot cares about the symbolism young men adopt in order to give themselves courage when fighting vast pervasive corruption foreign, domestic, public, and private in order to save their families and friends from Next time you hear that from someone punch him, or slap her, in the face, and tell them to visit a ukrainian village or apartment block where fellow white people who are devoutly christian and far more moral than any brit has the pretense to be, live on $80 a month, because russians want to expand eastward toward europe again, and the people who were entrenched by the russians in the political system, and then entrenched further by the oligarchs (gangsters) want to protect their profits. You tell me who is the more moral man? The one who seeks out costumes of fear and power over vastly superior numbers in order to gain courage so that he can take his ife into his own hands on behalf of his people, or the pathetic virtue signal spiral of western privileged do-nothings who destroy their civilization through such posturing? Who do you lionize? What political power does it seek? What self confidence does it give you? Howe do you lie to yourself that your life has meaning other than conspicuous consumption? ANd worse, conspicuous consumption of virtue signals – little lies we tell ourselves to say we are anything other than excess burden on the carrying capacity of the planet. These people are fighting for their families, friends, future, and nascent nation. I’ll tell you who. It’s obvious. And that’s the end of the story. Virtue signaling makes me sick. And angry. And for that matter, what the hell is wrong with Nazi anything any more, what century are you (they) living in? They dress nice. They cared for their people. And they were loved by their citizenry. And if it weren’t for the brits and Americans we would never have had the first world war, the nazis or the cold war, or the iron curtain, or the rise of islam. So if you wanna know who the shitty tyrants in this world are it wasn’t the nazies trying to save their people, it was the brits and americans who destroyed european civilization out of imperial greed.

  • Um. Ukrainian Nazis? Please Don’t Signal Your Virtues Around Serious People.

    Apr 10, 2017 11:11am UKRAINIAN NAZIS? OMFG. ACTUALLY COMPARE THE BRITS TO THE NAZIS AND WHO WAS WORSE FOR OUR CIVILIZATION? —“I heard there were Nazi Sympathizers in the Ukrainian military. Is that true?”— omg. Listen. what kind of privilege do you have to live under to virtue signal on that scale? You’d have to be be entirely incognizant of the desperation of a people who live under pervasive corruption, russian paid-for corruption, an oligarchy (libertarians desire a return to) that is basically nothing more than organized crime syndicate, that pays for the government to keep the people in poverty. So here is how I (and others in ukraine) would translate your question: “What kind of ignorant, privileged, overweight, unfit, tv-watching, spoiled, effeminate idiot cares about the symbolism young men adopt in order to give themselves courage when fighting vast pervasive corruption foreign, domestic, public, and private in order to save their families and friends from Next time you hear that from someone punch him, or slap her, in the face, and tell them to visit a ukrainian village or apartment block where fellow white people who are devoutly christian and far more moral than any brit has the pretense to be, live on $80 a month, because russians want to expand eastward toward europe again, and the people who were entrenched by the russians in the political system, and then entrenched further by the oligarchs (gangsters) want to protect their profits. You tell me who is the more moral man? The one who seeks out costumes of fear and power over vastly superior numbers in order to gain courage so that he can take his ife into his own hands on behalf of his people, or the pathetic virtue signal spiral of western privileged do-nothings who destroy their civilization through such posturing? Who do you lionize? What political power does it seek? What self confidence does it give you? Howe do you lie to yourself that your life has meaning other than conspicuous consumption? ANd worse, conspicuous consumption of virtue signals – little lies we tell ourselves to say we are anything other than excess burden on the carrying capacity of the planet. These people are fighting for their families, friends, future, and nascent nation. I’ll tell you who. It’s obvious. And that’s the end of the story. Virtue signaling makes me sick. And angry. And for that matter, what the hell is wrong with Nazi anything any more, what century are you (they) living in? They dress nice. They cared for their people. And they were loved by their citizenry. And if it weren’t for the brits and Americans we would never have had the first world war, the nazis or the cold war, or the iron curtain, or the rise of islam. So if you wanna know who the shitty tyrants in this world are it wasn’t the nazies trying to save their people, it was the brits and americans who destroyed european civilization out of imperial greed.

  • THE RIGHT’S WHINY LITTLE BITCHES (bitching) Conspiracy theory, psychologism, nih

    THE RIGHT’S WHINY LITTLE BITCHES

    (bitching)

    Conspiracy theory, psychologism, nihilism, projection, shaming, ridicule, rallying ….

    Either you can conduct a full accounting of the interests involved in a decision, or you can’t. Either you understand the material – economic, military, strategic, or you don’t. Either you have been in charge of large numbers of people or you haven’t. Either you have been in charge of other people’s money or you haven’t. Either you have been in charge of satisfying a constituency that placed you in power or you haven’t. And either you can demonstrate by WHAT YOU MEASURE (fully accounting) that you grasp all of the above – then you’re just a little princess in the school yard raspberrying the girls who don’t like you.

    Just how its. You want a powerful Right? How about not talking like little fucking school girls who don’t get their way.

    Only children and women make moral arguments. Men talk strategy, money, economy, and violence.

    Either man up and be the Right, or you’re part of the problem.

    I can’t fucking figure out if this [Syria Chem-Weapons Bombing] made any sense or not. As far as I can tell, it amounts to nothing more than “we have no idea who did this, but you really don’t wanna do this, cause we’ll nuke your fucking asses if you use chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons for anything other than a massive invasion by a hostile state actor – and even then it needs to be a last resort, used against soldiers”.

    As far as I know there are at least twelve facilities that were not shut down in Syria. As far as I know, the weapons are available on the black market but Syria can’t afford them, and they are too dangerous to transport. As far as I know Assad (the regime) does not have sufficient control over his commanders in the field to prevent the use of these weapons if they are found – and useful. As far as I know the iranians also supply their factions with these chemical weapons and have money and infrastructure to purchase, make, and distribute them. As far as I know the only demonstration of force that is possible amidst this uncertainty is to attack a known base – yet give warning, so that all actors involved understand that war is war, but human rights are human rights, and the global order is predicated on human rights and markets as a means of prohibiting the past violence. And this method has been reasonably successful compared to the pre-war period.

    Sigh. I wanna win too. Jacking off is just jacking off….

    Until we set the house and senate on fire, nothing is going to change. When we do that, everything will change.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-08 10:03:00 UTC