Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • JAMES IS WRONG OF COURSE: SOME EDUCATION FOR THE MASSES: 1) The constitution doe

    JAMES IS WRONG OF COURSE: SOME EDUCATION FOR THE MASSES:
    1) The constitution does not answer the question of secession.

    2) However, upon enacting the constitution, “national sovereignty would be transferred by the new Constitution to the whole of the American people.”

    3) This means that the people choose the government, and the government and the court have no say. A vote is enough. (Unanswered Question: A vote of whom?)

    4) And it means that the States’ territorial unity (now continent) is of such strategic security to all, that the security of any and all are threatened by separation. In other words, the primary purpose of the federal government was military defense and sovereign security.

    5) And this still means that under the constitution, the people of any state have the right to a local republican form of government.

    6) In Texas v. White (1869), the Supreme Court confirmed unilateral secession unconstitutional, while commenting that revolution or consent of the states could lead to a successful secession.

    7) Later court rulings have placed unconstitutional limits on the people’s right to sovereignty. These may have been practical, but they were not constitutional. The court is limited by the constitution. The constitution is limited by the people. And the people are limited by ‘Natural Law’ (Note: Which you probably don’t understand as the Science of Cooperation, but it’s not that complicated.)

    8) It is absolutely positively constitutional, for anyone, including an elected officer, to advocate for national divorce. (Sorry, Marjorie no matter how we judge her, absolutely has that right)

    9) And, “…whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness”

    10) That is the right of revolution, revolt, replacement with whatever they see fit.

    Conclusion:
    … a) The sovereignty of the people lies with the people, and the people alone.

    … b) The constitution survives until they vote that it doesn’t.

    … c) And revolution may be required if voting fails – and is the people’s NATURAL, inalienable right. A right that may neither be taken from them, or voluntarily abandoned.

    … d) And in the end, everything on earth is dependent upon those who are willing to use pointy objects – and the largest military in the world consists of American conservatives by something on the order of twenty times.

    … e) Our military sounds impressive but consists of something on the order of 200k fighting soldiers, and 330k reserves whose loyalty is divided. Only two cities can field substantial police forces and only for short periods. Our military has failed in every insurgency. And that was during a time of never before seen asymmetric strength.

    … f) In the very near future, the choice that the government, and the people would(may,will) face, is losing a world war or satisfaction of domestic conflict by restoration of the pre-civil-war constitution, to an alliance of sovereign states, guaranteed a republican government, defense of natural rights (not wanted rights), and the right to produce their own policy, commons, and culture as they see fit.

    … g) because after all, a culture war only exists, because the states were deprived by way of dictate not constitution, of their right to produce the informal institutions that they prefer. The USA used west germanic (British) law to enact a copy of the germanic holy roman empire, which survived for 1000 years, until napoleon destroyed it.

    And FWIW, I’ve done a revolution. The minute a democratic government shoots at you, you win.

    Cheers

    -FIN-

    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-22 01:28:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628205042925699074

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627864664146059265

  • Q: ~”Curt What currency would [a secessionist part of the country] use?” A: (bel

    Q: ~”Curt What currency would [a secessionist part of the country] use?”
    A: (below)

    Understand a little more clearly:

    Our (our organization’s) objective is to prevent what we see as a deterministic civil war, or continued disorganized, increasingly rapid collapse, by repeating the founding of the country with a Common Law suit against the state for the redress of grievances.

    Our political system cannot scale to a domestic empire of this scale, especially when occupied as the world policemen of communication, finance, transport, and trade, without the support of the taxation produced by an equivalent empire.

    We find it somewhat difficult to believe that the majority of the population would not prefer the solutions will propose – they benefit all at the expense of the federal bureaucracy, the predatory financial sector, the media, and the academy. And they radically alter our economy at least as significant as the Roman reforms.

    But we have exhausted debate between our factions. We have exhausted the capacity of the electoral system to solve this question by voting. Will very likely exhaust the capacity of the courts to restore enough of the constitution that our problems are legally recoverable.

    We are left, upon exhaustion of the courts, with a suit against the state (legislature) in a repetition of the founding fathers’ suit against the crown, culminating in the declaration of independence – or lastly, we are left with a bloody civil war none of us wants, but too many of us anticipate, and some look forward to with joy.

    Why? We have learned that the industrial revolution has freed us not just of labor but of the social, political, and economic necessity of cooperation and compromise with those who have the feminine moral bias in favor of what we call communalism or communism and minimum responsibility for the average person, and what we call the masculine or republican or European tradition of maximization of responsibility for the average person.

    In other words we are seeing an overwhelming want and need to choose opposite paths for our futures. This plays out in every domain of life, from the Scandinavian evidence that the more freedom we have to choose our futures, the less we compromise, and more we follow our natural instincts to feminine empathizing and masculine systematizing: the experience in time vs the outcomes over time.

    So it’s time for a national divorce. We have run the experiment of the marxist, feminist, race-marxist sequence and we have ended up hating each other.

    We no longer wish to live with people who hate us, who wish to eradicate our people, eradicate our traditions, and eradicate our culture, institutions, and history.

    We wish you well in your continued experiment with the repetition of the mistakes of every other civilization in the world that led to equality in stagnation and poverty during the early middle ages.

    We wish to restore the grand European tradition that made Europe a vast open air museum to the achievements of man, and that dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, early death, violence, crime, and the vicissitudes of nature.

    You are welcome to choose for yourselves.
    You may not choose for us.
    And we have no wish to choose for you.
    And we can no longer pay the costs of your social destruction by the social construction of the false promise that there is an alternative to our traditions that will produce an equal or better outcome for all.

    Our Christian religion is just natural law in theological garb. Our Constitution is just natural law in philosophical garb. In reality, it’s just physics under that theology and philosophy.

    We live by the science of man – not the ideology that the science of man and the natural world can be altered by the social construction of a novel religion that is a mere repetition of those that have failed mankind for millennia.

    Divorce it is.

    -FIN-

    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 01:44:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627846603624140801

  • We’ve exhausted persuasion. We’ve exhausted voting. We have yet to exhaust the c

    We’ve exhausted persuasion.
    We’ve exhausted voting.
    We have yet to exhaust the courts.
    After that we can exhaust the last option, repeating the American and English revolutions, by demand from the Congress.
    After that, it’s pointy objects, rope, and setting everything on fire.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-18 02:24:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626769656424824838

    Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626765915256762368

  • FEMA is as useless after hurricanes as the CDC and the WHO are for epidemics. Or

    FEMA is as useless after hurricanes as the CDC and the WHO are for epidemics. Organizing the private sector under the military or guard in times of crisis is the faster, easiest, and most powerful method of reacting to emergencies – not depending on an agency that does nothing useful at all.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-17 22:26:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626709685796478976

  • Q: “Curt doesn’t know as much about the law as he thinks he does.” A: Good argum

    Q: “Curt doesn’t know as much about the law as he thinks he does.”
    A: Good argument. I haven’t passed a bar exam. And I would never want to ‘lawyer’ for a living.

    However, there is a difference between extant jurisprudence and ‘lawyering’ as thought and practiced, vs the science of decidability, uniting the sciences with it, applying that science by completing the natural law program (scientific law), and reforming constitutions, legislation, regulation, and findings of the court, and then a reformation of the law, constitution, institutions, legislation, regulation, and findings of the law.

    In other words, there is a difference between a scientist, an engineer, and a craftsman. Judges and lawyers are craftsmen. They practice ‘lawyering’, as said by our dearly deceased Saint Judge Antonin Scalia. I work on and produce the science and logic (computability) of law proper and its application to legislating, judging, and lawyering.

    PART 1
    PART 2

    PART 1:

    WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE?

    1. Well, the practice of law “Lawyering” consists largely of knowing:

    … a) How to research and argue law. Any decent law school professor will say they’re teaching you how to think about the law. But you’ll forget most of what you learn in law school quickly. It’s more important that you know how to read, interpret, apply, and argue local, state, federal and constitutional law than it is that you recall everything in the body of law.

    … b) In particular, the law of Civil and Criminal Procedure. Meaning the terms, processes, and procedures of conducting ‘lawyering’ in court. Civil procedure is the most important subject in law school, because it consists of the rules within which you can conduct your ‘lawyering’. The difference is criminal procedure sets a high bar for the state and a very high bar for defending individual’s rights against the state.

    … c) Some depth in whatever specialization(s) of the law you work within. People tend to specialize in very difficult matters (criminal) difficult (tax, technology, corporate, mergers and acquisitions, international law) or in mass market law (divorce, family, bankruptcy, civil court), or in the big boy games of appeals, supreme court.

    In reality, if you read documents from a few cases, especially in appeals courts, you can judge a lawyer by his or her arguments as easily as you can any other student papers in college. šŸ˜‰

    .. d) The problems that arise in expectations of the people vs lawyers and judges. It’s hard for inexperienced people to imagine the many ways people commit harms or crimes. But the court doesn’t have to imagine, it has encountered them and has to decide them. So, that means the courts have to account for all varieties of complex human interactions and interactions between those actions and laws. So the court defends against things you would never do by design, but are still violations of the law. And your opponent’s desire is to cast your actions as intentional – even if ignorant or accidental. In other words, the scope of reasonable conditions that each of us assumes is small than the scope of actions the courts account for. This is why those of us who specialize in legal theory prefer simple laws. And it’s why the court grants you the benefit of the doubt if it can do so.

    … e) the law as practiced is neither what’s promised to us, what’s moral, or what’s ethical. (This is what I work on fixing). And you must ‘get over it’ to practice law. (I can’t and won’t get over it. I’d rather fix the law instead. šŸ˜‰ )

    ( more in Part II … )

    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-17 17:22:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626633306555940882

  • In law does it matter if you intend to cause a harm, or only if your actions cau

    In law does it matter if you intend to cause a harm, or only if your actions cause a harm? The latter, it matters that you failed due diligence against harm. In truth does it matter if you intend to lie, or that you failed due diligence against lying? The latter – your intention doesn’t matter. In Jewish ethics does it matter the buyer’s consequence of the exchange, or just that the exchange was voluntary?

    Similarly, in Jewish ethics, does it matter if the exchange was productive, or whether it was just voluntary? In Jewish ethics, does it matter if risk is symmetric or can it be asymmetric? In Jewish ethics, are all people treated equally or differently?

    I can answer these questions and dozens more for every religion, which represents every major civilization.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-17 14:42:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626592894600769539

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615841715256201224

  • THE COVID TRANSMISSION PATH WASN”T ANONYMOUS Yes, the covid transmission path wa

    THE COVID TRANSMISSION PATH WASN”T ANONYMOUS

    Yes, the covid transmission path was:
    … (a) the elderly and their caretakers.
    … (b) the home environment
    and not:
    … (c) walking around in public.
    Which was obvious by early March of 2020.

    The whole thing was blown out of proportion.

    It destroyed the reputation and public confidence in the WHO, CDC, Medical, and Scientific Communities and accelerated the collapse of mainstream media.

    But worse it destroyed what threads of legitimacy the government had, illustrated the failure of strategic trade policy and emergency inventories, and demonstrated that politicians and the media and self interested parties, would make claims that they had no business to, and imposed costs on the public they had no right to.

    We no longer will ‘believe the science’ or ‘believe the president’ and we already don’t ‘believe the media’. And we’re closer to unwilling to ‘believe the medicine’.

    Never tell anything other than the truth to the public. It should be a criminal offense to make such claims.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-16 04:15:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626072784823635968

  • “… 92.4% of all NYC murder or manslaughter suspects in 2021 were either black

    -“… 92.4% of all NYC murder or manslaughter suspects in 2021 were either black or Hispanic. “–

    We have a class problem that’s categorizable as a race problem because of the difference in class composition between the races. If you think class isn’t genetic (it is) then you’re the cause of the problem, because you’re preventing us from policy that might (at least try) to correct the problem.

    Why? Class roughly equals genetic load. And genetic load (be offended) is increased under lower neotenic evolution. So, genetic load roughly equals neural regulation and plasticity. Neural regulation and plasticity result in lower IQ, lower conscientiousness, higher impulsivity, and aggression, and lower neoteny lowers time for neurological development of self regulation, and increases rate and depth of sexual maturity, resulting in higher aggression, and antisociality.

    What can be done? WHile there are diminishing returns, only discipline, ritual, and training can correct behavior. We know the church and family could do it. Without church and family we can’t achieve it.

    Whiteness is expensive. It is the most emotionally and psychologically costly group strategy on earth. Why? Because whitness requires the maximization of individual responsilbility for self, others, and the commons.

    And the more diverse we are the more impossible that becomes. So, full integration is achieved not by the same education and training but by the education and training necessary to satisfy the needs of the genetics and circumstances of every individual.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-15 16:41:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1625898189978050572

  • Q: WHY IS THE WEST IN CRISIS “THIS TIME”? First mistake: The False Oneness of ā€œW

    Q: WHY IS THE WEST IN CRISIS “THIS TIME”?

    First mistake: The False Oneness of ā€œWeā€:

    (a) So, we aren’t all failing. But under demogratic government that’s unprotected from false promises of freedom from the laws of nature, are “we” failing?

    (b) Or are the talking class (the unproductive but attention-seeking classes) converting enough people to a new pseudoscientific faith resulting in the destruction of the modern world, as Christianity and Islam resulted in the destruction of every great civilization of the ancient world?

    (c) Are we failing or is failure being caused?

    THE EXPLANATION:

    – We saw the Natural expansion of bronze, iron, steel, and industrial age civilizations.

    – We saw the Natural expansion of empirical, scientific, technological knowledge.

    – We saw the Natural evolution of middle, working, and women classes entering the economy, entering consumption, entering taxation, and entering political influence.

    – We saw the Natural lag in our institutions as each class that entered the economy and polity expressed its will and bias – until it over-reached and failed. The counter-enlightenment age of philosophy, the marxist-to-woke religion, the feminist religion. The libertarian religion. The neoconservative religion.

    – We are seeing the Natural point at which the female experiment is failing as did the anglo Saxon upper middle class, aristocracy of everyone, founderā€™s middle-class farmer ethics of everyone, marxist, labor class of everyone, feminist class of everyone, and multiculturalism equality of all of man. All these systems fail as monopolies, Instead the founderā€™s middle-class rule of law creates the forum where we all succeed regardless of class.

    – We are seeing the Natural point at which multiculturalism was determined to fail, dragging europe into middle eastern and south american constant tribal, clan, and ideological, and class conflict. Why? Because only small ethnically homogenous federated states contain sufficient marginal indifference, power distance, debt capacity, and willingness to redistribute to preserve a rule of law of the natural law, constitutional, monarchic, parliamentary, multi-house state.

    – The reality is that weā€™re all different in ability, age, experience, knowledge, and time. And that we must create civilizational, national, political, commercial, social, familial, and interpersonal markets.

    – Are there any feminine civilizations surviving? No. There can’t be. Why? Because the feminine instinct maximizes consumption and individual irresponsibility for the commons as much as the male instinct maximizes capitalization and individual responsibility for it.

    – Any hostile minority that can attain either greater than ten percent of the population, or ten percent of the talking classes, can convert (conquer) the existing system of norms, simply because they are more motivated to, and have ā€˜something to sellā€™.

    – Likewise, any restorative minority can reverse the hostile minority by the same means.

    – So become the new hostile minority and save us from another dark age.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-15 00:33:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1625654519215362048

  • Q: DO ABSTRACT OBJECTS EXIST? (Philosophy) Given: Existance = Persistence Wherea

    Q: DO ABSTRACT OBJECTS EXIST?
    (Philosophy)

    Given: Existance = Persistence
    Whereas;
    … 1. Patterns of constant relations exist, for the simple reason that the universe and all in it, is constructed of a vast, hierarchy of stable (constant, persistent) relations that requires energy (change) to change state (alter those persistent, stable, relations).
    … 2. Humans identify those patterns as fragments, parts, objects, spaces, and backgrounds.
    … 3. Humans combine those patterns into episodes of objects, spaces and backgrounds.
    … 4. Humans identify patterns between episodes and their constituent parts
    … 5. Humans predict by auto association futures of episodes, and their parts, Objects in relation to one another, or objects an their parts. etc.
    … 6. This predictive capacity results over time in categorizing Episodes, objects, relations, and properties into generalizations we call categories of ‘marginally indifferent relations’.
    … 7. We then repeat the process with these categories.
    … 8. This process scales into imagination, fictionalism, fiction, story-making, sequence-making (pathfinding), etc.
    And Whereas;
    … 9. Human memory stores the hierarchy of these predictive sequences and resulting patterns through repetition (both temporarily and then especially during the first sleep cycle).
    … 10. These relations are then re-constructed from memory whenever stimulation is provided to the network of stored sequences – always by auto-association.
    Therefore;
    …11. Abstract objects in any sense (a) require human sense, perception, prediction, episoding, indexing, and memory. (b) must be reconstructed every time they are referenced, just like running must be reconstructed by the movement of the legs. (c) even if recorded by some symbols or marks, must be reconstructed by sense perception using from the symbols or marks.
    … 12. As such abstract objects have the potential to exist (persist), but must always be constructed (reconstructed).
    … 13. Any other claims is a word game. Whether we call that word game an analogy, sophistry, a pseudoscience, or a lie is merely the paradigm with which it’s stated and the consequence of the utterance.
    -Fin-

    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-15 00:12:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1625649157355499522