Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • THE FINAL WORD ON NAP/ISV, NAP/DP (the end of the libertine as useful idiot) Rot

    THE FINAL WORD ON NAP/ISV, NAP/DP

    (the end of the libertine as useful idiot)

    Rothbardianism is an attempt to restore eastern european financial predation on the middle, working and lower classes.

    The NAP is, like most Cosmopolitan arguments – whether socialist, libertine, or neo-conservative – is a half truth (informationally incomplete) intentionally designed to require you to substitute your own information thus appealing to our ‘pathological altruism’. So the purpose is to get us to invest or risk, so that we can lose our investment yet blame ourselves.

    The Logic of the Half Truth isn’t difficult. One must have something to aggress against. So the statement NAP is a half truth.

    The ongoing debate in cosmopolitan libertinism is reducible to defining the scope of property that we insure one another from, and which we agree to retaliate for, aggression against.

    The test is Blackmail. Blackmail constitutes a voluntary exchange, but it incentivizes retaliation. This is an empirical statement (an is) not theoretical statement (should).

    The purpose of property rights (mutual insurance of each other’s property) is to incentivize cooperation and disincentivize retaliation in furtherance of productivity.

    So rothbard proposes NAP/IVP or “ghetto” property rights. Meaning “if I can get away with a deal then it was moral”, whereas “aristocratic” NAP/Demonstrated Property or western property rights by contrast “if one will not retaliate against me for this action then it was moral”.

    This is why westerners created a high trust polity where none did, and why the jews were eventually outcast (or murdered) wherever they settled.

    (This is also the source of the ‘lie’ of Crusoe’s island which is little more than an idealized ghetto: the sea functioning as the walls of the ghetto. Yet man evolved without such walls – and having to build a common defense to erect them, not by the gift of natural walls provided by the sea, or gift of unnatural walls provided by the aristocracy who constructed the cities.)

    All libertinism, all rothbardianism, is an insidious lie as great as marxism, neo conservatism, christianity, judaism, islam, and all other great lies. The purpose of this lie is to destroy our ability to construct commons, including our most important commons: trust and truth telling.

    Libertinism was designed to morally license lying and cheating. To restore the method by which the ghetto preyed upon the lower classes and to apply it to those same individuals. And well intentioned ‘useful idiots’ bought into Rothbardianism just as happily as well intentioned idiots bought into marxism-socialism-neo-puritanism-postmodernism and neo-conservatism.

    We all criticize one another without grasping that we have all been fooled. All baited. All deceived. Just as we were by christianity.

    The only source of liberty is our reciprocal warranty under pain of death that we will use violence to prevent the imposition of costs upon one another’s property, and will retaliate against the imposition of costs on one another’s property, regardless of cost.

    Roads are not the problem that we must solve. The problem is the creation of property rights in sufficient scope that we eliminate demand for the state as a preventer of theft, a prosecutor of theft, and an insurer against theft by all means possible.

    Rothbard is no better than boaz, marx, freud, keynes, or Strauss. He was just another cosmopolitan liar creating a great deceit with which to undermine our high trust civilization – the only high trust civilization ever to exist.

    There is no shame in having been fooled and playing the part of a useful idiot.

    But there is shame in seeking to defend a great lie in order to avoid admitting that one has been duped into playing the part of a useful idiot.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-30 04:39:00 UTC

  • Our problem is not fiat money. Our problem is not classical liberal democracy. O

    Our problem is not fiat money.

    Our problem is not classical liberal democracy.

    Our problem has been our error:

    1) Our women. The introduction of women as equals despite their parasitic reproductive strategy;

    2) The great pseudoscientific lies of the cosmopolitans marketed to women and ‘slaves’ (underclasses).

    3) And the profiteering by the academy, media, state complex, from the sale and distribution of those lies.

    Now that we know how to constrain them, we have another question to answer so that no future generation attempts the same by another innovation just as devious.

    How shall we punish them?

    A punishment must last for generations in order to be remembered.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-29 15:47:00 UTC

  • NO YOU ARE WRONG ABOUT FIAT MONEY Contrary to libertine deceptions. The ambition

    NO YOU ARE WRONG ABOUT FIAT MONEY

    Contrary to libertine deceptions.

    The ambition of rothbardianism is to resurrect Usury, not improve our lot.

    If a cosmopolitan is talking and it sounds good it’s a half truth that seeks to steal from you. So you just have to go looking for it.

    ===

    Paul (Molly)

    (a) There is no reason why one must save and invest in the same medium (currency). (Just as molly suggests)

    (b) fiat money constitutes shares in the issuing government and is managed as such. We literally borrow from one another.

    (c) the price of commodity money (silver / gold) is more open to manipulation and more volatile than fiat currency (stock) simply because (i) scale and (ii) the treasury targets price stability (inflation).

    I want the government to stop stealing from me also, but the value of a relatively stable rate of inflation, and the discounts that come from the use of fiat currency (stock), mean that I must save and invest in alternative stores of value.

    Remember that hard money lenders have power over you that a government that must maintain price stability (inflation) does not. Meaning that if you issue debt then government is a problem. But if you borrow credit then inflation is your friend.

    The way to fix the financialization of the economy is to i) nationalize Mastercard and ii) issue liquidity directly to consumers via that card rather than as interest rates through the banking system.

    It is this revolution that some of us hope to bring about – and which will literally destroy the banking cartels.

    Cheers

    Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-29 15:32:00 UTC

  • REMOVING REVOLUTIONARY UNCERTAINTY If your political solution provides an improv

    REMOVING REVOLUTIONARY UNCERTAINTY

    If your political solution provides an improvement at least for a passionate minority you will eventually win.

    If your political solution is sufficiently tangible to be discussed and criticized, as well as procedurally implemented, then time and effort necessary to win are reduced significantly.

    If your political solution solves a know source of conflict in society then it will take even less time and effort to win.

    The purpose of revolution is merely to raise the cost of the status quo such that the transaction cost of switching from the current set of rents to the new solution is preferable to retaining the current rents at the expense of it.

    The enemy of improvement is the predatory state.

    No moral man can object to Propertarianism’s market for commons and demand for testimonial truth in all matters of the commons.

    Those who object to such things are defacto- objectively immoral.

    That does not stop mystics, rationalists, obscurantists, pseudoscientists, and outright propagandist liars from trying to preserve their parasitism and deceit.

    But it removes moral restraint from those of us who wish to restore the world to civilization from cosmopolitan pseudoscientific barbarism.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-27 10:21:00 UTC

  • The Silver Rule: Cooperation. The Golden Rule: Buying Options On Cooperation

    [T]HE SILVER RULE IS THE ORIGIN OF COOPERATION THEFT The only ‘shame’ is theft. The only oath, not to lie, cheat, steal or impose harm. The summary of this ethic is: “Do not unto others as you would not want done unto you.” The anglo saxons were right and the Christians wrong. MORALITY (RULE OF COOPERATION) The silver rule is necessary for cooperation. The golden rule buys options on future cooperation – but encourages parasitism. ACQUIRE We act upon that which we have acquired without imposition of costs upon that which others have acquired by doing the same. COOPERATE We act in concert to voluntarily produce common goods and services. WARRANTY We warranty the truthfulness of our speech by due diligence in the cleansing of error, bias, imagination, wishful thinking, and deceit from our speech. INSURE We insure one another against the imposition of costs by collective suppression of free riding by collective prosecution of those who impose costs upon others. INVEST We invest in the construction of commons for the production of returns, and we deny one another the ability to impose costs upon them. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • The Silver Rule: Cooperation. The Golden Rule: Buying Options On Cooperation

    [T]HE SILVER RULE IS THE ORIGIN OF COOPERATION THEFT The only ‘shame’ is theft. The only oath, not to lie, cheat, steal or impose harm. The summary of this ethic is: “Do not unto others as you would not want done unto you.” The anglo saxons were right and the Christians wrong. MORALITY (RULE OF COOPERATION) The silver rule is necessary for cooperation. The golden rule buys options on future cooperation – but encourages parasitism. ACQUIRE We act upon that which we have acquired without imposition of costs upon that which others have acquired by doing the same. COOPERATE We act in concert to voluntarily produce common goods and services. WARRANTY We warranty the truthfulness of our speech by due diligence in the cleansing of error, bias, imagination, wishful thinking, and deceit from our speech. INSURE We insure one another against the imposition of costs by collective suppression of free riding by collective prosecution of those who impose costs upon others. INVEST We invest in the construction of commons for the production of returns, and we deny one another the ability to impose costs upon them. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Political Philosophy is a lot easier when you just start from the premise that a

    Political Philosophy is a lot easier when you just start from the premise that all goods are hypothetical, all bads are not, and that the only means of accumulating the knowledge to determine good from bad is exchange. This eliminates the fallacy that any of us know what is in fact good for all, other than institutions that allow us to choose any possible good but prohibit us from pursuing any known bad are a defacto good by prohibiting bads.

    This is contrary to human cognition because we evolved for negotiating cooperation not truth telling. It is contrary to human desire, because we desire consensus. It is contrary to political incentive because it limits political power.

    We all think we are ‘right’. But the only ‘right’ we can know is trade. Just as the only way we know whether we engaged in production or engaged in waste, consumption, or entertainment, is if others trade for what we create.

    Information and volition tell us what ‘right and wrong’ do not.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-23 02:13:00 UTC

  • I DON”T WANT TO DISENFRANCHISE ANYONE. A market for consumer goods and a market

    I DON”T WANT TO DISENFRANCHISE ANYONE.

    A market for consumer goods and a market for commons both benefit from producers and consumers.

    But I am an Aspie. I hate conflict. I don’t shun from it. That would be immoral. But I hate it none the less. I grew up in an environment so horrible that no one would envy it. And my dream world consists of one in which we compete but there is no conflict.

    And our current governmental structure, which evolved to suit middle class merchants and agrarians who needed to find a way to allocate scarce resources in order to create necessary commons, is completely inadequate for an era in which the American empire consists of various regions and subcultures put into conflict by constant social engineering – the only purpose of which appears to maintain the bureaucracy and american international military power.

    We can make a better world.

    Truth, Contract, Market Government, Regionalism.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-21 09:32:00 UTC

  • FEMININE GENETIC DENIALISM Mothers of Serial Killers, Murderers and Career Crimi

    FEMININE GENETIC DENIALISM

    Mothers of Serial Killers, Murderers and Career Criminals Demonstrate Denial As Genetic Cognitive Bias.

    Why do you assume that they would not consistently vote and speak to defend our enemies?

    Primeval woman was the possession of any group of brothers that could capture her. She cares not who captures the herd, only that there is competition such that women have options.

    Woman is Pandora, Eve, and Steinem: destroyer of civilization.

    Her talents must be marshaled just as mens must be marshaled.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-21 07:48:00 UTC

  • If Germany can outlaw Nazi intolerance they can outlaw muslim intolerance. If Am

    If Germany can outlaw Nazi intolerance they can outlaw muslim intolerance.

    If America can suppress christianity in public speech it can suppress islam in public speech.

    If our civilization is predicated upon Aristotelian science, Aristocratic Truth, Voluntary exchange, and Cristian Love and Compassion, we can suppress or outlaw: Mysticism and Psuedoscience, Religious Doctrine, Involuntary Coercion, and Hatred and Intolerance.

    The european war was a century ago. It’s time to defend ourselves.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-21 07:43:00 UTC