If your concept of god is “him who created the rules of the universe”, then if Physical law, Natural Law, Common Law, Norms, Traditions, Myths and Rituals are identical, then man has followed the commands of god and become one with god’s deigns.
And only evil does otherwise.
Any religion incompatible with physical and natural law is not divine: it is either error or the work of the devil.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-03 05:50:00 UTC
If we can restore property seized by the Nazis by force, why cannot we restore property stolen by the Socialists by fraud? #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-27 09:22:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/714019848322420736
ASK THREE QUESTIONS ON IMMIGRATION
1) “Will you reciprocally insure my liberty buy force of arms if I insure yours by force of arms?”
2) “Will you impose no cost upon me and my life, body, kin, mate, physical property, normative property, institutional property, territorial property, cultural property, that is not the result of productive, fully informed, voluntary exchange, free of negative externality?”
3) “Will you agree that there is no law greater than Natural Law, and that in all matters of conflict it is natural law and only natural law that we will use for decidability?”
If so then you agree to engage in liberty with me. If you do not then you do not agree to engage in liberty with me.
BUT
I pray you take heed how you inform our person. For never did men agree to such a treaty that each was not called into demonstration. And unless you adopt our language, our culture, our myths our traditions, our laws, our manners, our ethics, and our morals, then you cannot uphold this treaty. And if you do not uphold it, then we may hold you in violation of it. And end you for your deeds.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 11:55:00 UTC
You cannot experience the economic benefits of Natural Law, Common Law, Universal Standing, Rule of Law (Universal applicability), Testimonial Truth, Testimony, Jury, Property, Money, Credit, Interest, the Sacred Natural Commons(public behavior), The Sacred Grove (park), the Militia and Chivalry, high trust, and the nuclear family, without having all of them.
This is the cult of our people: Natural Law: truth in all things. Testimony.
Sharia Law, Jewish Law, Byzantine and Asiatic Decree, are incompatible with Natural Law (science) from which our western “goods” are created.
There is but one law of man, just as there is but one law of physical science.
All else is error, bias, wishful thinking, obscurantism, suggestion, and deceit: FRAUD.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 04:47:00 UTC
If we can dumb down SAT tests to accommodate women, and if we can dumb down the courses in the classroom to accommodate women, and we can dumb down the courses in the university to accommodate women, why can’t we have separate classrooms, courses, and universities, for men?
Why can’t we have equality of fulfillment?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 03:53:00 UTC
If men have to do the high risk and dirty jobs, work more hours, have a harder time staying in the work force, fight in war, and die younger, or – pay high taxes for not doing so, then why can’t women have to produce children or pay taxes for not doing so? Women can’t fight (sorry it’s true), and men can’t bear children (self evident).
I mean, why can’t we have equality?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 03:50:00 UTC
[W]hen you switch from the conduct of pedagogy to science, justification to criticism, opportunity searching to error reduction, you see that philosophy has unjustifiably self congratulated itself quite a bit throughout history. And when you find the central problem of epistemology is not improvement of your own meagre ability to produce ideas, but the detection of deception in the extraordinary ability of the collective to produce a market of ideas, then you treat the philosophical discourse very differently. I have taken to assuming all philosophical statements are attempts at free riding, and that I must discover how they seek free riding. This has become my current view of philosophy. On the other hand it requires a catalog of human errors just as it requires a catalog of crimes, to practice the craft of prosecuting thought in the advancement of fraud.
[W]hen you switch from the conduct of pedagogy to science, justification to criticism, opportunity searching to error reduction, you see that philosophy has unjustifiably self congratulated itself quite a bit throughout history. And when you find the central problem of epistemology is not improvement of your own meagre ability to produce ideas, but the detection of deception in the extraordinary ability of the collective to produce a market of ideas, then you treat the philosophical discourse very differently. I have taken to assuming all philosophical statements are attempts at free riding, and that I must discover how they seek free riding. This has become my current view of philosophy. On the other hand it requires a catalog of human errors just as it requires a catalog of crimes, to practice the craft of prosecuting thought in the advancement of fraud.
If defense of the commons for men, and the bearing of children for women, and the formation of marriage of both, is required for participation in the selection of the commons.
The myth then is that marriage is for the purpose of friendship and entertainment alone.
Marriage is an industry for the profitable production of generations that can survive the test of sustenance without parasitism upon others.
We must return to our ancient task of domesticating man, in our quest to transform the beast into man, and from man to gods.
The evil that they have wrought must not go unpunished.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-22 06:14:00 UTC
We punish men for direct theft, but we don’t punish women for indirect theft.
We force prosperous men to pay for children, but we don’t tax prosperous women for not having children.
Increase tax rates on women progressively as they pass 22 without children and watch what happens by rational choice.
Eliminate community property, alimony and child support and watch what happens by rational choice.
Restore the gender compromise tot he family once again by removing it from government.
Marriage is a commons: the business of producing offspring, sustenance, and elder care.
The state can no more provide retirement income than can the major corporations. All those fantasies were built on a presumption that permanent relative growth would persist at intergenerational rates.
Liars, and fools all.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-22 04:07:00 UTC