I don’t care what you denounce. I care only about whether you fight for rule of law and meritocracy or discretionary rule and equality. if the latter, you just need killing. It’s that simple.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 16:29:47 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/5148898710886674
REMOVING MATHEMATICS FROM PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY AND RETURNING IT TO THE SCIENCE OF MEASUREMENT.
In mathematics, construction must be operationally possible (computable), even if the descriptions (proofs) are only deducible.
Others only provide an IDEAL (logical) justification of why cantor is wrong, and not a REAL (scientific and operational) explanation of why he was wrong: that the technique (like gears) demonstrated something valuable: that the rate of production of positional names produces different sized sets regardless of the point of termination (scale or limit). Cantor is one step removed from theology(ideal by design), and speaking in philosophy (ideals), instead of speaking in mathematics (measurement) and science (operations).
The depth of this statement allows us to repair mathematics and return it to a science of measurement, rather than this nonsensical platonism used today – a remnant of the ancient greeks.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 08:06:00 UTC
(From elsewhere, for archival purposes)
NO, spatial and math intelligence are the same g-loading. Its math-spatial vs verbal. That’s the primary distinction.
NO, there is only one kind of intelligence, with perhaps eighty different innate talents, however, they all scale such that G or general intelligence, that is higher or lower will raise all innate talents or lower all skills proportionally.
The marginal differences are produced by hours of practice with any given talent on any different problem. However, always, a person with higher intelligence performing the same number of hours of practice will defeat the person of lower numbers. The only place this does not seem to matter as much is athletics and we are not sure why other than the hind brain and spinal cord makes less use of the neocortex and so requires less intelligence. Even then, we see more intelligent people outperform less.
Yes, the ‘backwardness’ of Slavs has been a serious question for more than a century. The lack of intellectual contributions, patents, innovations. We can find no genetic reason for it, although it carries through the diaspora in that germanics tend to be ‘above’ Slavs, and nordics above germanics, and normans and scotts-anglos above all others. We do not know why. It is quite possibly better opportunities for family construction in europe due to greater wealth and longer exposure to the preservation of assets in the middle class. It could be as simple as ‘bigger craniums’ for all we know.
Yes I have commented on the low trust factor of slavic peoples and why slavic peoples retain low trust corrupt and superstitious polities, and I have spoken to reporters on television, in newspapers, and on web sites. I have stated that the easy solution is to import entirely new judiciaries from western countries, because we are all but incorruptible, and this would solve the problem in the post=soviet block within a decade. The problem is that the courts are horrible, and the legal systems archaic. (although great progress has been made in the past decade and especially since 2010.)
REPEATING THE ARGUMENT
You are attempting to cast Corded ware (Polish-Ukrainian territory), with celto-italic-germanic, which is true, BUT slavs, slavonic, are (a) a much younger people, with no history and possibly only a proto-language prior to 700. So while it may be possible to say that we all share black-sea ancestors, it is false to say they were slavs. The population-radiation is out of poland, for the simple reason that it’s the best farmland other than france. It is more correct to say that today’s slavs are the youngest and most ‘recent’ white people to evolve, and possibly that they are purest genetic europeans. What you can’t say is that there is any relationship between the term slav and any of the successes in the west. There isn’t *any* justification for that. So stop using the word ‘slav’ and use ‘early europeans’ and you’re ok. The general evidence is that the people who spoke germanic languages around the north sea evolved physical traits superior to all other european tribes in the modern world, largely through self-domestication. The corded ware culture probably created the waves of european excellence in the ancient world.
It is my civic duty to mankind to expose pseudoscientific and nonsense arguments. I do this work by requiring the opposition to state their theories in operational language given the incentives in the period, where they demonstrate consistency in category, logic, correspondence, incentive (rational choice) and scope.
The errors you are making are constructivist errors: (a) using the biblical method of conflating myth, literature, and history (b) without using the scientific method of falsification requiring the most parsimonious explanation to any statement.
The technique you are using has a name, it is called ‘fictionalism’. It is similar to that used by Jewish Abrahamists looking backward, and Nostradamus looking forward (for profits), and the Reich’s propagandists, and the Soviet Propagandists. These techniques take advantage of conflating a desirable myth with the use of cherrypicking, and the total avoidance of falsification.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-15 18:11:00 UTC
THE PROBLEM IS NOT SCIENCE PER SE, IT IS LAW
First: I think that if you can’t define the term ‘science’ that you can’t make claims about who understands what. And I am fairly certain that very few people can define science in scientific terms so to speak. So there is a very great difference between the definition of science that one warranties and a definition that one does not.
Second: there is a difference between (a) science that identifies a pattern, or opportunity, and science that defines limits of the pattern or opportunity, (b) science that it is possible to draw deductions from, and science that it is not. (c) science that one warranties, and science one does not.
Third: there is a difference between policy one warranties and policy one does not.
The difference between science and non-science is only testable by warranty.
How would science and policy differ if one’s speech and policy were involuntarily warrantied, just as products(property) and services(actions) are involuntarily warrantied?
Is information(science) not a market goods? Is there some special pleading you think that science is worthy of? (no)
The problem is not the definition of science. the problem is lack of warranty of due diligence, and lack of involuntary warranty against falsehood, immorality, and harm.
The problem is not science – it is law.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-14 09:59:00 UTC
YOU WILL ABSOLUTELY DEVELOP A RACIAL CASTE SYSTEM IN ANY DIVERSE POLITY
THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF BRAZIL
WHITES
47.73% of Brazilans or 91 million are White. White Brazilians are defined as people who are solely or mostly descended from European immigrants
15% of Brazilians or 31 million citizens are of Italian extraction, the largest number outside of Italy itself.
The descendants of European immigrants, particularly the Germans, Italians, Austrians, Swiss, Poles, Ukrainians, French, Dutch, Lithuanians, Scandinavians, Russians, Hungarians, Finns and Luxembourgers are mainly concentrated in the southern part of the country, in the states of Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, Paraná, and the most populous, São Paulo; these states have a wide majority of citizens of European descent. São Paulo alone has the largest population in absolute numbers with 30 million whites. In the rest of the country, part of the white population is of colonial Portuguese, Dutch, Spanish and French settler stock, especially in the Northeast. In the mid-southern states of Rio de Janeiro, Espírito Santo, Minas Gerais, Goiás, Mato Grosso do Sul and in the Federal District, the number of whites (European and Levantine phenotype) revolves around 50% of the population, being somewhat equal to the absolute number of Afro-Brazilians, East Asians and mixed race Brazilians, i.e., Caboclos or Mestizo/Castizo, Mulattoes, Eurasians and Gypsies altogether.
THE BROWNS
The Pardos (“Browns”) make up 43.13% or 82.3 million people of Brazil’s population. Although, according to DNA resources, most Brazilians possess some degree of mixed-race ancestry, less than 45% of the country’s population classified themselves as being part of this group due to phenotype.
The Pardos can be a mixture of Europeans, Levantine Arabs, Crypto-Jews or Anusim, Blacks, Amerindians, Gypsies and Asians. Brazil does not have a category for multiracial people, but a Pardo (brown) one, which may include caboclos, mulatos, cafuzos (local ethnonyms for people of noticeable mixed White and Amerindian, Black and White, and Amerindian and Black descent, i.e., mestizos, mulattoes and zambos, respectively), the multiracial result of their intermixing (despite most of White and Black Brazilians possessing some degree of race-mixing, since brownness in Brazil is a matter of phenotype) and assimilated, westernized indigenous people.
ROMA
The pardo category in Brazil also includes 800 thousand gypsies or Roma people, most of them coming from Portugal but also different countries in Eastern Europe and the Baltics.
JEWS
Jews in Brazil are a small but sizable population,[25][26] and they include mostly Ashkenazi Jews (who also arrived with the post-colonial contingent of European migration),[27] a smaller proportion of Sephardi Jews (mostly Eastern Sephardim arrived with the contingent of post-colonial immigrants from Syria and Lebanon, but also North African Sephardim from Morocco settled in the Amazon, and Western Sephardim arrived with the Dutch), and to a much lesser extent Mizrahi Jews. Overall, the small but sizable Brazilian Jewish community is concentrated especially in São Paulo,[28] Rio de Janeiro[29] and Porto Alegre,[30] and they are accounted for without Brazilian descendants of Portuguese “New Christians” (ethnic Sephardic Jews forced to convert to Christianity and arrived with the ethnic Portuguese during the colonial period),[27] which if included would inflate the Jewish origin population in Brazil considerably. By themselves, Brazilian descendants of Portuguese “New Christians” are estimated to account for a figure anywhere between hundreds of thousands to several million.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 12:36:00 UTC
kings were fairly good in germanic nations because they generally governed kin and near kin. It is in a king’s natural interest to produce a middle class polity from which he can draw wealth. It is in his natural interest to virtue signal for having done so. One does not need to ‘be’ anything other than dependent upon income(middle), and limited by the militia(all) and the judiciary(elite) and the church(lower).
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 17:15:00 UTC
SO ARE YOU A PHILOSOPHER OR A SCIENTIST?
—“So you are a philosopher and your hypothesis is that you have perfected the scientific method / empiricism?”— Rik Storey
Hmmm …
EMPIRICISM TESTS BUT ON DIMENSION OF REALITY
1 – Empiricism is only one property of the scientific method, that only falsifies external correspondence.
PHILOSOPHER OR SCIENTIST?
2 – I do not know if I am a philosopher or a scientist who specializes in truthful speech. I do not know if the philosopher/scientist dichotomy exists any longer, or if sciences are now specialized disciplines for the discovery of truthful speech, and philosophy is reduced to the study of the decidability of preferences.
HYPOTHESIS? COMPLETED MAX USE OF SCIENTIFIC METHOD
3 – My hypothesis is that I have completed the scientific method within the dimensions of reality humans are capable of thinking and acting within.
FUTURE CONSEQUENCES
4 – My expectation is that invention will produce the same degree of progress as did the development of european common law of property, aristotelian reason, baconian empiricism, newtonian/darwinian/mengerian competition (falsification). And that it will allow us to both complete the eradication of the counter-revolution against reason by the Abrahamists, and assist us in transitioning to extremely mixed economies as we continue to reduce the demand for labor that produces multiples of returns on time, and continue to produce temporal increases in productivity using smaller and smaller numbers of people.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-08 15:57:00 UTC
Paul Krugman,
We are in a cold civil war and you are making the common feminine error of psychologizing it.
In this civil war, as in any civil war, the parties are willing to incur vast losses in order to prevent the success of their enemies. And you find yourself one of the enemies. Which I suggest is history repeating itself for the same reason that it has always repeated itself: the belief that the levantine empire is preferable to the nation state.
It’s that simple you know. If you cannot build and hold an east asian or western european nation state, you have no choice but to develop an indian or south american caste system or levantine tribal barbarism from which east and west have managed to insulate themselves – until the sixties.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 22:00:00 UTC
IS YOUR MORAL ARGUMENT BY REVENUE, INCOME, OR BALANCE SHEET?
Whenever people claim some policy or value is good, ask them whether they mean a sales and revenue report, an income statement, or a balance sheet.
1 – Revenue Report
Money In the Door (liberal / female )
Ooooh, look what I have to spend!
2 – Income Statement
Money In Minus Expenses Out (libertarian – ascendant male)
Oh, maybe I have something left to save or invest?
3 – Balance Sheet
Assets minus Liabilities after Income and Expenses
(Conservative – Mature Male)
Hmm…. In the end, after all is said and done we’re still losing capital due to depreciation and unproductivity.
In other words, are they using full accounting (balance sheet), or are they *cherry-picking*?
Because a conservative includes genetic, social, institutional, and normative capital in his calculations. A libertarian is selective about it. And a liberal treats it as someone else’s problem.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 08:01:00 UTC
THE VALUE OF STATUS DEPRECATING SPEECH
The only reason to prohibit status-depreciating speech is to increase revenues. But one’s right to revenues ends where falsehood begins. Why? Because the function of status deprecating speech is to prevent imposition of costs upon the commons: the assets in the markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, production of commons, of polities, and of war.
(insults are important means of defense of the commons)
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 07:48:00 UTC