Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • Empirically, and this is unavoidable, you are headed to mirror brazil, the levan

    Empirically, and this is unavoidable, you are headed to mirror brazil, the levant, arabia, and india. There are only two extreme strategies: dysgenia (your model) or eugenia (the northern european model) of many small homogenous polities competing in a market preserving both.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 18:37:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954784989639577600

    Reply addressees: @ReneeStephen @kjhealy @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954784124761337856

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954784124761337856

  • It is always difficult to debate with the unsophisticated, but those unsophistic

    It is always difficult to debate with the unsophisticated, but those unsophisticated with immoral sensibilities, and dysgenic strategies, are insufficiently rational (meaning evolved human). As such compromise is impossible, and separation necessary.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 18:35:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954784439892152321

    Reply addressees: @ReneeStephen @kjhealy @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954784077453897729

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ReneeStephen @kjhealy @mattyglesias Ergo, civil war is preferable to being dragged down into the levant, the desert and steppe, southern europe, south america, and india.Some of us prefer (wisely) to take the east asian path to survival and evolution rather than dysgenia. Thanks. It’s all math. And your side loses.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/954784077453897729

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @ReneeStephen @kjhealy @mattyglesias Ergo, civil war is preferable to being dragged down into the levant, the desert and steppe, southern europe, south america, and india.Some of us prefer (wisely) to take the east asian path to survival and evolution rather than dysgenia. Thanks. It’s all math. And your side loses.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/954784077453897729

  • Ergo, civil war is preferable to being dragged down into the levant, the desert

    Ergo, civil war is preferable to being dragged down into the levant, the desert and steppe, southern europe, south america, and india.Some of us prefer (wisely) to take the east asian path to survival and evolution rather than dysgenia. Thanks. It’s all math. And your side loses.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 18:33:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954784077453897729

    Reply addressees: @ReneeStephen @kjhealy @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954783685215219713

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ReneeStephen @kjhealy @mattyglesias Hence the optimum, and ONLY MORAL proposition is to separate and let consumption run its course, while those of us accumulate capital and watchy you turn the ‘third way’ into the levantine way, just as christianity and islam did, and marxism postmodernism attempt to.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/954783685215219713

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @ReneeStephen @kjhealy @mattyglesias Hence the optimum, and ONLY MORAL proposition is to separate and let consumption run its course, while those of us accumulate capital and watchy you turn the ‘third way’ into the levantine way, just as christianity and islam did, and marxism postmodernism attempt to.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/954783685215219713

  • Hence the optimum, and ONLY MORAL proposition is to separate and let consumption

    Hence the optimum, and ONLY MORAL proposition is to separate and let consumption run its course, while those of us accumulate capital and watchy you turn the ‘third way’ into the levantine way, just as christianity and islam did, and marxism postmodernism attempt to.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 18:32:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954783685215219713

    Reply addressees: @ReneeStephen @kjhealy @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954783303609053184

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ReneeStephen @kjhealy @mattyglesias If your premise is, that the people engage in temporal folly that produces intertemporal catastrophe (which is empirically, the case), then, I agree to allow the fools to govern their way (capital consumption), and the rest of us intertemporally (capital accumulation).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/954783303609053184

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @ReneeStephen @kjhealy @mattyglesias If your premise is, that the people engage in temporal folly that produces intertemporal catastrophe (which is empirically, the case), then, I agree to allow the fools to govern their way (capital consumption), and the rest of us intertemporally (capital accumulation).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/954783303609053184

  • If your premise is, that the people engage in temporal folly that produces inter

    If your premise is, that the people engage in temporal folly that produces intertemporal catastrophe (which is empirically, the case), then, I agree to allow the fools to govern their way (capital consumption), and the rest of us intertemporally (capital accumulation).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 18:30:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954783303609053184

    Reply addressees: @ReneeStephen @kjhealy @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954781031449616385

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954781031449616385

  • It has however, been a bulwark against the same creeping soviet-ization that has

    It has however, been a bulwark against the same creeping soviet-ization that has occurred in europe. Our country was designed to prohibit political activism, and demand all change by the private sector empirically by choice rather than ideally by force. A frozen gov’t is a good.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 17:16:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954764680446259200

    Reply addressees: @kjhealy @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954760136312147968

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954760136312147968

  • What Is The Minimum Average Group Iq Needed Before Civilization Can Independently Arise? Base Your Answer On An Iq Test Normed For Today’s Population.

    —”What is the minimum average group IQ needed before civilization can independently arise? Base your answer on an IQ test normed for today’s population.”—-

    RULES:

    1) Pareto always rules. 20% of the people always (and must) control 80% of the assets in order to organize a polity into voluntary (non slave/serf) production. Cities are markets are markets are formed by trade, and trade requires volition, and markets and volition make innovation possible if not only because the incentive exists.

    2) Roughly speaking you need the top 20% of your population able to calculate in whatever means of calculation is available to you, in law, in accounts, in seasons, etc.

    3) Empirically it appears that it’s pretty hard unless 20% is above 95 (the ability to learn by being taught without extraordinary repetition by the teacher), Above 105 to repair a system or a machine or a tool. Above 115 to learn by reading. About 122 to invent a machine or tool. A above 130 to synthesize new ideas and communicate them. Above 140 to originate an idea in the market for ideas. Although I think that limit is now approaching 150.

    4) It depends greatly upon the means of economic productivity available to the population. lowest IQ’s for pastoral, higher for agrarian, higher for commercial, higher for industrial, higher for technological and assumedly higher for post technological. Worse, as technology increases the value of lower IQ’s decreases. Worse, as the distribution of technology increases, the value of lower IQ’s decreases (this is the world’s next upcoming great disaster – if it isn’t already).

    5) If you can import knowledge of 140’s, 130’s 120’s into your group then you can benefit from the knoweldge and technollgy invented elsewhere.

    6) what appears today, is that it is extremely difficult to modernize a country today with IQ’s under 97, and I think the real number is 105. The reason being that the window of opportunity for those countries to modernize and develop middle class (market) behaviors because of their ability to import institutions and technologies and knowledge, has passed. (I’m almost certain of it). BTW: thank the communists for destroying that window of opportunity. If your country has an aggregate IQ under 97, and certainly if it is below 90, it will be very difficult, for the simple reason that ther eis no human capital unused in relation to the available means of producing the profitability necessary to create a voluntary organization of production (market economy and a middle class to run it.)

    7) as far as I know the primary competitive asset a country has going forward is a) homogeneity, b) median IQ >105, and a militia army dedicated to protecting both. That means china/korea/japan win. Europe could have but between immigration and civil war we have already (I’ve talked to the leading people about this repeatedly), lost something on the order of half to one standard deviation between 1800 and today through asymmetric reproduction. And we have lost the rest between 1965 and today through immigration.

    Cheers.
    Knowledge is not always pleasant.

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-minimum-average-group-IQ-needed-before-civilization-can-independently-arise-Base-your-answer-on-an-IQ-test-normed-for-today’s-population

  • What Is The Minimum Average Group Iq Needed Before Civilization Can Independently Arise? Base Your Answer On An Iq Test Normed For Today’s Population.

    —”What is the minimum average group IQ needed before civilization can independently arise? Base your answer on an IQ test normed for today’s population.”—-

    RULES:

    1) Pareto always rules. 20% of the people always (and must) control 80% of the assets in order to organize a polity into voluntary (non slave/serf) production. Cities are markets are markets are formed by trade, and trade requires volition, and markets and volition make innovation possible if not only because the incentive exists.

    2) Roughly speaking you need the top 20% of your population able to calculate in whatever means of calculation is available to you, in law, in accounts, in seasons, etc.

    3) Empirically it appears that it’s pretty hard unless 20% is above 95 (the ability to learn by being taught without extraordinary repetition by the teacher), Above 105 to repair a system or a machine or a tool. Above 115 to learn by reading. About 122 to invent a machine or tool. A above 130 to synthesize new ideas and communicate them. Above 140 to originate an idea in the market for ideas. Although I think that limit is now approaching 150.

    4) It depends greatly upon the means of economic productivity available to the population. lowest IQ’s for pastoral, higher for agrarian, higher for commercial, higher for industrial, higher for technological and assumedly higher for post technological. Worse, as technology increases the value of lower IQ’s decreases. Worse, as the distribution of technology increases, the value of lower IQ’s decreases (this is the world’s next upcoming great disaster – if it isn’t already).

    5) If you can import knowledge of 140’s, 130’s 120’s into your group then you can benefit from the knoweldge and technollgy invented elsewhere.

    6) what appears today, is that it is extremely difficult to modernize a country today with IQ’s under 97, and I think the real number is 105. The reason being that the window of opportunity for those countries to modernize and develop middle class (market) behaviors because of their ability to import institutions and technologies and knowledge, has passed. (I’m almost certain of it). BTW: thank the communists for destroying that window of opportunity. If your country has an aggregate IQ under 97, and certainly if it is below 90, it will be very difficult, for the simple reason that ther eis no human capital unused in relation to the available means of producing the profitability necessary to create a voluntary organization of production (market economy and a middle class to run it.)

    7) as far as I know the primary competitive asset a country has going forward is a) homogeneity, b) median IQ >105, and a militia army dedicated to protecting both. That means china/korea/japan win. Europe could have but between immigration and civil war we have already (I’ve talked to the leading people about this repeatedly), lost something on the order of half to one standard deviation between 1800 and today through asymmetric reproduction. And we have lost the rest between 1965 and today through immigration.

    Cheers.
    Knowledge is not always pleasant.

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-minimum-average-group-IQ-needed-before-civilization-can-independently-arise-Base-your-answer-on-an-IQ-test-normed-for-today’s-population

  • American Nationalists: In Secession, The Whole Pie Is Undesirable.

    1 – It is undesirable to hold the entire continent. 2 – it is undesirable to retain much of our own kind if they are underdeveloped and under-evolved (leftists/feminists/betas). (The aristocratic process of domesticating the underclasses in to Agency was incomplete.) 3 – It is entirely achievable to cause the breakup of the federal government in to regions with different ‘markets’ for participation, while preserving the insurer of last resort, in treasury, military, and judiciary of property. 4 – We have always been a minority and we are better and stronger bound with competitors. This is the result of aristocracy: the continuation of our ancestral industry of profiting from the domestication of animal man. European aristocratic classes were always small in number. Europeans have been small in number. Those of use who were created by that eugenic process are small in number. 5 – We are better off letting the less civilized people (and their genes) decline into arabia, brazil, india, and the steppe, and profiting from our differences. 6 – No civilization in history is as fragile as the american empire and it can be radically altered for our benefit in less than a year. There are no farms to return to. There are not enough soldiers to occupy. All that prevents success is attempting to (a) take the whole territory, (b) attempting to take the whole of our kin. Many of those kin are dead weight. 7 – Revolte. Separate. Build walls. Keep them out. The Chinese, Koreans, and Han hold the best external group evolutionary strategy even if we hold the best internal group evolutionary strategy. The urals and the bosphorus were not enough to protect us. 8 – Western (aristocratic) civilization is not replaceable. It was unique. A fortunate accident. And we dragged humanity out of ignorance, poverty, superstition, disease, starvation, and tyranny in just a few centuries in the ancient and modern worlds. 9 – We can rule the planet if we return to our native industrial specialization. 10 – and drag mankind behind us to ambitions we have not yet dreamed of.

  • AMERICAN NATIONALISTS: IN SECESSION, THE WHOLE PIE IS UNDESIRABLE. 1 – It is und

    AMERICAN NATIONALISTS: IN SECESSION, THE WHOLE PIE IS UNDESIRABLE.

    1 – It is undesirable to hold the entire continent.

    2 – it is undesirable to retain much of our own kind if they are underdeveloped and under-evolved (leftists/feminists/betas). (The aristocratic process of domesticating the underclasses in to Agency was incomplete.)

    3 – It is entirely achievable to cause the breakup of the federal government in to regions with different ‘markets’ for participation, while preserving the insurer of last resort, in treasury, military, and judiciary of property.

    4 – We have always been a minority and we are better and stronger bound with competitors. This is the result of aristocracy: the continuation of our ancestral industry of profiting from the domestication of animal man. European aristocratic classes were always small in number. Europeans have been small in number. Those of use who were created by that eugenic process are small in number.

    5 – We are better off letting the less civilized people (and their genes) decline into arabia, brazil, india, and the steppe, and profiting from our differences.

    6 – No civilization in history is as fragile as the american empire and it can be radically altered for our benefit in less than a year. There are no farms to return to. There are not enough soldiers to occupy. All that prevents success is attempting to (a) take the whole territory, (b) attempting to take the whole of our kin. Many of those kin are dead weight.

    7 – Revolte. Separate. Build walls. Keep them out. The Chinese, Koreans, and Han hold the best external group evolutionary strategy even if we hold the best internal group evolutionary strategy. The urals and the bosphorus were not enough to protect us.

    8 – Western (aristocratic) civilization is not replaceable. It was unique. A fortunate accident. And we dragged humanity out of ignorance, poverty, superstition, disease, starvation, and tyranny in just a few centuries in the ancient and modern worlds.

    9 – We can rule the planet if we return to our native industrial specialization.

    10 – and drag mankind behind us to ambitions we have not yet dreamed of.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 20:01:00 UTC