Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct

    The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRight

  • The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct

    The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRight
  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/28161834_10156136631687264_43757840

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/28161834_10156136631687264_43757840

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/28161834_10156136631687264_437578402228039721_o_10156136631687264.jpg The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRightPaul NunezI like this a lot. I still have a hard time figuring out who originated this scale of hierarchy,though. Almost seems like I’ve heard it from somewhereFeb 17, 2018 9:55pmThe Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRight

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-17 21:41:00 UTC

  • The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct

    The Nolan Chart is Ideological(emotional) not Operational (scientific). Correct dimensions are (a) decidability: rule of law vs discretionary rule, (b) territorialist strategy vs pastoralist strategy. (c) Kin vs Corporate strategy. All else follows. #Trump #Conservative #NewRight

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-17 17:42:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/964917943791480832

  • William L. Benge Unwarrantable positions are not punishable if they are not mate

    William L. Benge Unwarrantable positions are not punishable if they are not materialized into the commons. Personally held opinions which cannot be constructed into a viable argument or claim are either premature or presumption. We can take from this the true nature of the popular habit of airing one’s opinion to peers: infantilism by gossip. Now, OTOH, if a group of persons is exploring a matter then contributions are transmitted and received by the same discretion (reciprocity). But these transmissions do not reach the level of published theory, or declared truth-claim. They’re exploratory. Many errors must be presented in the process of singling out the least erroneous, for the one most truthful. This discretion cannot be granted to a party declaring a truth-claim. It must be warranted. (BAM!)

  • William L. Benge Unwarrantable positions are not punishable if they are not mate

    William L. Benge Unwarrantable positions are not punishable if they are not materialized into the commons. Personally held opinions which cannot be constructed into a viable argument or claim are either premature or presumption. We can take from this the true nature of the popular habit of airing one’s opinion to peers: infantilism by gossip. Now, OTOH, if a group of persons is exploring a matter then contributions are transmitted and received by the same discretion (reciprocity). But these transmissions do not reach the level of published theory, or declared truth-claim. They’re exploratory. Many errors must be presented in the process of singling out the least erroneous, for the one most truthful. This discretion cannot be granted to a party declaring a truth-claim. It must be warranted. (BAM!)

  • William L. Benge Unwarrantable positions are not punishable if they are not mate

    William L. Benge

    Unwarrantable positions are not punishable if they are not materialized into the commons. Personally held opinions which cannot be constructed into a viable argument or claim are either premature or presumption.

    We can take from this the true nature of the popular habit of airing one’s opinion to peers: infantilism by gossip.

    Now, OTOH, if a group of persons is exploring a matter then contributions are transmitted and received by the same discretion (reciprocity).

    But these transmissions do not reach the level of published theory, or declared truth-claim. They’re exploratory. Many errors must be presented in the process of singling out the least erroneous, for the one most truthful.

    This discretion cannot be granted to a party declaring a truth-claim.

    It must be warranted.

    (BAM!)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-14 12:18:00 UTC

  • Why Are The Republicans Trying To Destroy Our Justice Department When Most Of The Top Officials Are Republicans. Seems Like The Republicans Are Eating Their Own People?

    Because they allowed the Clinton organization to buy Opposition Research, feed it to the FBI, and attempt to influence the election by sowing falsehoods.

    Because hillary clinton is possibly one of the most corrupt and ideological individuals ever to hold political office, and the Justice Department will not investigate her.

    So we have no russian collusion (and we never will have). And Clintons collude with everyone, in particular, George Soros against the united states on a regular basis.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-are-the-Republicans-trying-to-destroy-our-Justice-Department-when-most-of-the-top-officials-are-Republicans-Seems-like-the-Republicans-are-eating-their-own-people

  • Why Has There Been So Much Debate Recently About Race And Iq?

    Because only Europeans and East Asians have reduced the size of their underclasses sufficiently to produce advanced civilizations – and even so, the east asians still fell prey to bureaucracy and stagnation in the absence of rule of law(empiricism), markets(empiricism), and science(empiricism) in addition to the chinese predilection for political lying (deny and delay), predilection for lying in order to preserve face, and the endemic familial corruption they still practice, and catastrophic legal system.

    The rest of the planet has not reduced the size of their underclasses.

    The size of your underclass determines group hostile to your race, subrace, cult(religion), tribe, and clan.

    The reason being that behavioral norms are determined by the median of the population.

    We rarely see criticism of the immigration of cognitive elites – all of whom practice some form of aristotelianism(empiricism), and out of necessity, adhere to rule of tort law. (although there are exceptions).

    So westerners have spent thousands of years ridding ourselves of underclass, and downward pressure from the middle classes, the young and the old to fill underclass roles, yet most ‘immigrants’ are from the underclasses, and violate our middle class norms, traditions, values – and worse, they vote for the democrats AGAINST our middle class norms, traditions, and values.

    The left has achieved through underclass immigration and the destruction of the family what it could not achieve through their ideas.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-has-there-been-so-much-debate-recently-about-race-and-IQ

  • Is Being Racist Edgy?

    You know, I have built a reputation out of answering the uncomfortable questions using the language of economics to explain human evolution, development, behavior, and thought.

    And providing uncomfortable but true information is always ‘edgy’. And working on ‘edgy’ subjects draws attention.

    Despite writing rather prolifically against racism (particularly racism against whites), I have ended up as a bit of a …. spokesman on the matter, quite by accident.

    And honestly it’s not something I care for.

    The truth is I hate the subject, I don’t care if I’m edgy, I just want to know the truth. And the truth is that every single claim of racism is just a postmodern form of ridicule, shaming, gossiping and rallying.

    The fact is that steriotypes are the most accurate measure in the social sciences.

    So what will we do to change the fact that stereotypes are profoundly accurate descriptions of behavioral distributions among people with similar features. The reason is very simple: the scale of the underclasses of warmer climates that did not undergo manorialism is larger than the scale of the underclasses of the colder climates that went through manorialism (west europe, and east asia).

    Agrarianism was a genetic meat grinder. It made a profound difference. And the plague, and hte fact that europeans hanged so significatn proportions of the population every year, and the east asians (chinese) used the axe with equal profligacy let the middle classes move downward and create higher median distributions of abilities and behaviors.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-being-racist-edgy