Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • Argument. I say, well, we know when the concept of good vs evil was invented – t

    Argument. I say, well, we know when the concept of good vs evil was invented – to separate the Iranians from the indians. I mean, Nietzche wrote about this, historians have written about it, and Karen Armstrong’s Great Transformation both touches on it and gives citations.

    Woman – how can that be? Who says? Prove it! I’m like… um. You know do you have a counter argument? Do you have anything other than emotive opinion?

    Another one (woman, lawyer) says “we are poorer than in 1960”, and me and another guy say… “um.. omg no. is astounding how much wealthier we are. I mean, even since 1980” We give purchasing power examples. She gives us disbelief.

    WTF am I supposed to do with normies…..

    We need to end democracy right away. These f-king people are terrible.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-30 20:58:00 UTC

  • When you are paid, its not free speech but commercial product, and open to regul

    When you are paid, its not free speech but commercial product, and open to regulation like any other product – because payment is a malincentive to gossip, straw man, and mislead. Why shouldn’t paid speech be warrantied like any other product brought to market? it should?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-29 01:15:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012504829867057152

    Reply addressees: @WheresMyArk_23

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012493862500290561

    IN REPLY TO:

    @GumbysGrandson

    We have a president who promised the NRA he will continue to protect the 2nd amendment but considers journalists employing their 1st amendment rights like the ones murdered in Annapolis the “enemy of the people.”

    This isn’t right.

    #CapitalGazette

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012493862500290561

  • What’s changing is either side’s ability to legislate from the bench, rather tha

    What’s changing is either side’s ability to legislate from the bench, rather than the state and federal legislatures and the amendment process. We gain the Restoration of Rule of Law.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 01:28:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012145690728951808

    Reply addressees: @barbetta1 @ifindkarma @BearmanShannon @Alyssa_Milano

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012144049019424769

    IN REPLY TO:

    @barbetta1

    @ifindkarma @BearmanShannon @Alyssa_Milano Trump is past the soft-peddling. He’s moved into hardcore “Plan B” which gives Rs everything. SCOTUS. Because in the end, THAT is where their “needs & wants” meet. Orchestrated rigging of SCOTUS is their collective ‘Get out of jail card’. Sure explains Trump kids visiting Kennedy

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012144049019424769

  • It’s done. Get over it. You have state law, federal law, and the amendment proce

    It’s done. Get over it. You have state law, federal law, and the amendment process, but the use of the courts to circumvent the legislatures is done.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 01:24:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012144601770143744

    Reply addressees: @dthompMCMXCIX

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012144209678217217

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012144209678217217

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE ANIMAL MAJORITY PROVIDES SURVIVAL BY INCR

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE ANIMAL MAJORITY PROVIDES SURVIVAL BY INCREMENTAL GRACEFUL FAILURE

    The evolutionary reason some of us have agency and most of us do not, is because reason is subject to temporal failure, and information is subject to intertemporal failure, and instinct provides a very successful method of graceful failure.

    Meanwhile selection for success of those with agency allows others to adopt new knowledge and understanding by imitation without abandoning their dependence upon intuition.

    This is the same reason we still have cheaters. While cooperation is most beneficial under ordinary circumstances, cheating (immorality), and predation (violence), are extremely valuable methods of graceful failure.

    The animal majority is insurance in case we fail. But they are not to be taken seriously whatsoever.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 18:02:19 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. (ANSWER TO A “BAIT POST” – BTW: I BLOCKED THE

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (ANSWER TO A “BAIT POST” – BTW: I BLOCKED THE INDIVIDUAL WHO REQUESTED IT.)

    SOME RADICAL LEFTIST ASKED ME HOW PROPERTARIANISM WOULD JUDGE HITLER’S GERMANY’S RELOCATION POLICY

    It was a dishonest attempt to bait hate speech. I don’t do hate speech. Ever. I do Science and Natural Law.

    Here is the Answer:

    (a) That high trust is nearly exclusive to the germanic and Japanese peoples, and is their civilization’s competitive advantage.
    (b) That outside of scientific researchers (scientists) non kin shouldn’t cohabitate in the fist place, because it reduces trust, and creates those exact conditions of conflict. (The upper intellectual classes are more autistic and less dependent upon collective for information, and the lower classes the opposite).
    (c) That peoples that specialize in rent seeking and profiting from moral hazard in particular shouldn’t be hosted (any more than those dependent upon begging and thievery) because it leads to prosecution, persecution, and at times, extermination – as well as destroying trust and raising costs of policing the commons.
    (d) That peoples who practice separatism of any kind shouldn’t be tolerated by host societies for those same reasons.
    (e) That this process of separation, if pursued, should be legislated with a multi-year timeline, later prosecuted for non-compliance, and then subject to Hoppe’s “Forcible Removal”.
    (f) That the original relocation model, taken from the Soviet Relocations, had been successful there, and truthfully, throughout all human history.
    (g) That the combination of relocation (forcible removal) and a nearly impossible war was unmanageable. And that they could not fund both. Had they not been pressured by Russia into war, they would have succeeded.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 12:36:02 UTC

  • LACK OF DUE DILIGENCE = LYING Aug 06, 2017 1:51pm by Bill Joslin —“Curt equate

    LACK OF DUE DILIGENCE = LYING

    Aug 06, 2017 1:51pm

    by Bill Joslin

    —“Curt equates a lack of due diligence to vet ones ideas against error, bias, self deception, overloading etc as lying. Any primacy of consciousness or theism stands as arguing for a preference opposed to arguing a point in the commons.

    Theism and primacy of-conciousness are not verifiable in the commons – to proceed with them you must accept these premises.

    ***When we verify via our best empirical methods, our arguments gain credibility from reality. When we assert based on a priorisms which can not be found in reality we use logic to “steal credibility from reality” – we assert it as reality without consulting reality- a transfer of credibility from existence in reality, to the interpretive framework.***

    If an argument holds arbitrary assertions we can dismiss it off-hand. (If asserted without evidence it can be dismissed without evidence)”—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 10:14:00 UTC

  • (ANSWER TO A “BAIT POST” – BTW: I BLOCKED THE INDIVIDUAL WHO REQUESTED IT.) SOME

    (ANSWER TO A “BAIT POST” – BTW: I BLOCKED THE INDIVIDUAL WHO REQUESTED IT.)

    SOME RADICAL LEFTIST ASKED ME HOW PROPERTARIANISM WOULD JUDGE HITLER’S GERMANY’S RELOCATION POLICY

    It was a dishonest attempt to bait hate speech. I don’t do hate speech. Ever. I do Science and Natural Law.

    Here is the Answer:

    (a) That high trust is nearly exclusive to the germanic and Japanese peoples, and is their civilization’s competitive advantage.

    (b) That outside of scientific researchers (scientists) non kin shouldn’t cohabitate in the fist place, because it reduces trust, and creates those exact conditions of conflict. (The upper intellectual classes are more autistic and less dependent upon collective for information, and the lower classes the opposite).

    (c) That peoples that specialize in rent seeking and profiting from moral hazard in particular shouldn’t be hosted (any more than those dependent upon begging and thievery) because it leads to prosecution, persecution, and at times, extermination – as well as destroying trust and raising costs of policing the commons.

    (d) That peoples who practice separatism of any kind shouldn’t be tolerated by host societies for those same reasons.

    (e) That this process of separation, if pursued, should be legislated with a multi-year timeline, later prosecuted for non-compliance, and then subject to Hoppe’s “Forcible Removal”.

    (f) That the original relocation model, taken from the Soviet Relocations, had been successful there, and truthfully, throughout all human history.

    (g) That the combination of relocation (forcible removal) and a nearly impossible war was unmanageable. And that they could not fund both. Had they not been pressured by Russia into war, they would have succeeded.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 08:36:00 UTC

  • Anarcho – *(Rothbard, Hoppe) = at best, discretionary poly-logical, market law.

    Anarcho – *(Rothbard, Hoppe) = at best, discretionary poly-logical, market law. And therefore is limited to defense of intersubjectively verifiable property; since law can only form as such at the minimum tolerable scope of application.

    Just as the church majority parasites then, the state parasites, left parasites, and immigrant parasites, in group feminists, and in group libertines today and the abrahamists in all their forms, more people always want to preserve their means of cheating (parasitism) than want to suppress them – despite all evidence that the forgone parasitisms produce multiples of returns far beyond their individual abilities to produce such returns.

    This is why Anarchism cannot survive – because as the complexity of cooperation increases to produce higher returns, individuals and groups must exit in order to find insurers (governments) that permit the more productive, higher risk, means of production.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-23 10:54:00 UTC

  • “Revolt. Separate. Prosper. Speciate.” We have nothing to sell, only violence to

    “Revolt. Separate. Prosper. Speciate.” We have nothing to sell, only violence to impose. The cataclysm is trivially easy to accomplish. No empire in history has ever been so fragile with so many hyenas nipping at its heels. The rats have nowhere to flee.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-22 13:44:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1010156534804905985

    Reply addressees: @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1009861331476811776

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1009861331476811776