Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • Iberoamerican: A Hard Question of Identity that Boils Down to Genetic Load

    October 18th, 2018 7:09 PM A HARD QUESTION OF IDENTITY THAT BOILS DOWN TO GENETIC LOAD

    —“Curt, I want to ask you, as an Iberoamerican, Hispanic, or Latino American, (whatever you want to call us), What is the propertarian viewpoint of the Spanish-Portuguese conquest of Americas? Taking into cosideratión the massive and fast mixing of the “races” (Amerindians, Europeans, and Black Africans). Our countries are among the most Unequal in the world, competing with the south of Africa for IQ disparity. Are we part of the western civilization, or just some weird bastardization of it?”— A Facebook Friend (I’ll leave this one anonymous)

    (WARNING: This is an unpleasant assessment of human capital – measurements of this kind are not ‘kind’ to our emotions. But measurements can be made.) DEMOGRAPHICALLY, IT’S NOT COMPLICATED The iberian conquest of south american by european people was a near genocide, and certainly a civilization-cide, but the result was in fact, an unequal distribution of net improved human capital. You (South Americans) are still (presently) a ruling IE Population (Caste) like the IE’s in India vs the Dravidians. You are following the same course of development as they did in India. Like India, the native population is too large for you to genetically carry. Either you will politically interfere with their breeding rates, or continue to form a caste system as you do now, or separate as southern brazilians want to, or you will disappear as did the IE’s of india. There are no IE’s left in India. Only variations of the 70-30 to 30-70 mixture. in that sense, indians evolved into a separate civilization and a separate sub-race. You (South Americans) are still Western (Christian, Aristotelian, Rule of Law, European) due to genetic traits, institutions, and traditions, but Western Civilization includes the spectrum of peoples: south american (hispanic-amerindian-african), vs north american (european, african, hispanic, and now Asian), vs southern european (old european/balkan), vs northern european (newer european/germanic/scandinavian) , vs slavic (newest european), vs Russian/Slavic (pure european), vs FInnic (Northeastern European). And the three major christian religions, plus the secular christian religions we call variations of social democracy. At present, yes, south america is part of western civilization although we are seeing quite a bit of literature stating it is it’s own civilization. A trend which will continue once the current experiment with democracy has completed (ended). In 1000 years, will that be the case? In as little as 100? The genetic load of the native population is far too high. Just as the genetic load of the USA is now too high. and if you follow me you will recall that decline in economic and political potential is non-linear and accelerates rapidly below 97( which is 1/2 std deviation from those who can learn by reading instructions and fixing machines). The future of South America is that of India and its challenges, not China and its advantages. The choice of what happens to the european minority in the higher distributions is something you must come to terms with. As you know, genetic load determines nearly everything. Cheers.

  • To Elders of The Black Sun 3 – Aristocracy and Law

    October 17th, 2018 9:54 AM TO ELDERS OF THE BLACK SUN 3 – ARISTOCRACY AND LAW 1) All religions are substitutes for the Initiatic Brotherhood of Warriors. There is no bond as strong – even kin. 2) The right is organized like christian denominations, as a class hierarchy with most literal at the bottom and most allegorical at the top. 3) Aristocratic orders (law) are always and everywhere imposed by Force (violence), and consist of 3.1) Law stated as myth 3.2) Law stated as process 3.3) Law stated as Law. 4) Religion is the cheapest means of TEACHING the Law by indoctrination (repetition). This is why ARISTOCRACY conquerors with violence, and adopts Religions and Priesthood to Rule (morally) and retains Law to Rule (commercially), and retains Violence to Rule (militarily). 5) All religious content contains (a) group evolutionary strategy (method of cultural warfare), (b) normative law, and (c) constitutional law (limitations on the people and the ruler). 6) The western Myth during our ascent was Homer (The Tragedy of Achilles) (Heroic Aristocracy). The semites adopted this and reversed it as the Tragedy of Jesus (victim as hero). Our ascent in the late medieval world was due to the restoration of Aristotle (Power over nature) and restoration of commerce (HRE/Hansa Trade), and rapid expansion (colonialism by sail). The Semites retaliated with The Tragedy of Labor (victim as hero), followed by the revolt against Darwin (The Anti-Nazi Cult – victim as hero). What narrative will compete with them?

  • Atheism Isn’t a Religion. at Best It’s an Ideology

    October 16th, 2018 4:38 PM ATHEISM ISN’T A RELIGION. AT BEST IT’S AN IDEOLOGY [A]theism isn’t a religion (and casting it as such is a fraud), it’s a statement of Science (measurement) and used as an Ideology (political change), and arguably a Prosecution (law against fraud and harm). The only reason atheism is ridiculous is because we haven’t restored the oath, stoicism (mindfulness), ancestor, and nature worship (celebration). (native western religion) As such Criticism without Replacement is rather IDEOLOGICAL, for the simple reason that intuition(emotions) DO REQUIRE training, just as do our bodies, reason (reason, calculation, computation), and memories (knowledge, skills). Religion is just one of the layers of education. We can perform that education by various means. The whole ‘lies’ nonsense isn’t a necessary means. There is no evidence of it.

  • ABSOLUTISM IS NONSENSE. ZERO TOLERANCE IS NOT. 1) We pursue what we can both und

    ABSOLUTISM IS NONSENSE. ZERO TOLERANCE IS NOT.

    1) We pursue what we can both undrestand and suits our interests.

    2) Absolutism is easy to understand. It’s the children’s-blocks version of political problem solving.

    3) Absolutism is easy to use when ‘backward’ or ‘at war’, but extremely error prone at competition and production. It is an extremely weak form of organization compared to markets. It depends on retaining the attention of the populace through constant manipulation. It is expensive. Hence absolute military, absolute law, market economy, limited charity is the optimum order. (India vs China. China has better demographics, is ethnically homogenous, and has the red army. India has none of the above.)

    4) one can organize the vast network of productions in an polity by authority (fear), compensation (reward), or deceit (fear or promise). But we are no longer in a position where the information system can be monopolized and the population is ignorant.

    5) The purpose of advancing markets (liberalism et all) is to provide those in power with the means of holding and expanding power cheaply and easily. In other words, one is naive to think he can capture attention and power without material incentives, and we are all victims of overestimating our deviation from the norm.

    6) The optimum government is flexible (Roman) with Authoritarianism for War, Markets for growth, and Redistribution for Windfalls.

    7) In other words: Money Scales Power. And the vast majority are always and everywhere motivated by (a) access to mates, (b) food and food prices (now energy as well), (c) change in economic condition (d) release from perceived oppression (taxation, competition, conquest).

    POWER REQUIRES WEALTH REQUIRES MARKET ORDER REQUIRES RULE OF LAW – which is what Putin has had to learn.

    OUR RULE OF LAW IS SIMPLY TOO TOLERANT.

    (Ergo – stop stroking your dicks, and masturbating to manga-fantasies of absolutism.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-15 19:44:00 UTC

  • No More Lies

    October 13th, 2018

    NO MORE LIES “[I] have a simple response: no more lies. No matter what the justification. To prevent abrahamism in all its forms, whether ancient or modern, suppress all falsehood, and require warranty of due diligence for informational products that we do for goods and services.“

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/44037213_10156705463297264_48523502

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/44037213_10156705463297264_48523502

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/44037213_10156705463297264_4852350233071321088_o_10156705463287264.jpg PARETO GENERATIONS IN THE USA (Updated)

    (Try to understand that this is to provide an understanding of scales of different groups.)Reece Edward HaynesI wonder, how strong is the correlation between IQ on the bell curve and class position?Oct 13, 2018 4:30pmCurt Doolittle( In the main it’s obvious, but above 140 nothing is predictable because it appears that you start sacrificing something or other to get there.)Oct 13, 2018 4:31pmCurt DoolittleBy and large (on average) iq and class are correspondent with a range of about seven to ten points. Reason being is personality and other factors affect (improve, harm) class position.Oct 13, 2018 4:32pmCurt DoolittleThere are people who work their asses off and graduate college with 100 iq’s. THere just aren’t many of them. There are people with 170 iq’s that do construction work. There are plenty of people with 120’s that go nowhere.Oct 13, 2018 4:33pmVengefül BobmoranLower-middle-upper : First row under the column title is number of people while the 2nd is annual income.

    (At first I was confused by the dollar sign.)

    I would have expected the lower class to be bigger.Oct 13, 2018 4:40pmReece Edward HaynesThat all makes sense. My earning power at present I would be unsure of, as I am still a student and am only just starting to build my plans for after graduation, but the goal I work towards for now, is not to be chained to a desk somewhere doing the 9-5. I would like my time to be my own. And then be able to use that time productively to make further progress. Etc.Oct 13, 2018 4:40pmCurt Doolittle^ the fact that the lower class isn’t bigger is evidence of the oversize of the american middle class. THAT IS WHAT IS FRIGHTENING.Oct 13, 2018 4:41pmPARETO GENERATIONS IN THE USA (Updated)

    (Try to understand that this is to provide an understanding of scales of different groups.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 16:10:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/44037213_10156705463297264_485235023

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/44037213_10156705463297264_485235023

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/44037213_10156705463297264_4852350233071321088_o_10156705463287264.jpg PARETO GENERATIONS IN THE USA (Updated)

    (Try to understand that this is to provide an understanding of scales of different groups.)Reece HaynesI wonder, how strong is the correlation between IQ on the bell curve and class position?Oct 13, 2018, 4:30 PMCurt Doolittle( In the main it’s obvious, but above 140 nothing is predictable because it appears that you start sacrificing something or other to get there.)Oct 13, 2018, 4:31 PMCurt DoolittleBy and large (on average) iq and class are correspondent with a range of about seven to ten points. Reason being is personality and other factors affect (improve, harm) class position.Oct 13, 2018, 4:32 PMCurt DoolittleThere are people who work their asses off and graduate college with 100 iq’s. THere just aren’t many of them. There are people with 170 iq’s that do construction work. There are plenty of people with 120’s that go nowhere.Oct 13, 2018, 4:33 PMVengefül BobmoranLower-middle-upper : First row under the column title is number of people while the 2nd is annual income.

    (At first I was confused by the dollar sign.)

    I would have expected the lower class to be bigger.Oct 13, 2018, 4:40 PMReece HaynesThat all makes sense. My earning power at present I would be unsure of, as I am still a student and am only just starting to build my plans for after graduation, but the goal I work towards for now, is not to be chained to a desk somewhere doing the 9-5. I would like my time to be my own. And then be able to use that time productively to make further progress. Etc.Oct 13, 2018, 4:40 PMCurt Doolittle^ the fact that the lower class isn’t bigger is evidence of the oversize of the american middle class. THAT IS WHAT IS FRIGHTENING.Oct 13, 2018, 4:41 PMPARETO GENERATIONS IN THE USA (Updated)

    (Try to understand that this is to provide an understanding of scales of different groups.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 16:10:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/44037213_10156705463297264_485235023

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/44037213_10156705463297264_485235023

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/44037213_10156705463297264_4852350233071321088_o_10156705463287264.jpg PARETO GENERATIONS IN THE USA (Updated)

    (Try to understand that this is to provide an understanding of scales of different groups.)Reece Edward HaynesI wonder, how strong is the correlation between IQ on the bell curve and class position?Oct 13, 2018, 4:30 PMCurt Doolittle( In the main it’s obvious, but above 140 nothing is predictable because it appears that you start sacrificing something or other to get there.)Oct 13, 2018, 4:31 PMCurt DoolittleBy and large (on average) iq and class are correspondent with a range of about seven to ten points. Reason being is personality and other factors affect (improve, harm) class position.Oct 13, 2018, 4:32 PMCurt DoolittleThere are people who work their asses off and graduate college with 100 iq’s. THere just aren’t many of them. There are people with 170 iq’s that do construction work. There are plenty of people with 120’s that go nowhere.Oct 13, 2018, 4:33 PMVengefül BobmoranLower-middle-upper : First row under the column title is number of people while the 2nd is annual income.

    (At first I was confused by the dollar sign.)

    I would have expected the lower class to be bigger.Oct 13, 2018, 4:40 PMReece Edward HaynesThat all makes sense. My earning power at present I would be unsure of, as I am still a student and am only just starting to build my plans for after graduation, but the goal I work towards for now, is not to be chained to a desk somewhere doing the 9-5. I would like my time to be my own. And then be able to use that time productively to make further progress. Etc.Oct 13, 2018, 4:40 PMCurt Doolittle^ the fact that the lower class isn’t bigger is evidence of the oversize of the american middle class. THAT IS WHAT IS FRIGHTENING.Oct 13, 2018, 4:41 PMPARETO GENERATIONS IN THE USA (Updated)

    (Try to understand that this is to provide an understanding of scales of different groups.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 16:10:00 UTC

  • All Speech Is Measurement,

    October 11th, 2018 6:52 AM ALL SPEECH IS MEASUREMENT, ALL STATEMENTS TRANSACTIONS. BUT MEASUREMENT OF WHAT? You know, the material universe seemed complicated until we discovered the atomic structure and created the periodic table of the elements. The same is true for the Grammars. Once you understand the grammars, all speech is as open to inspection and comprehension on its structure alone. Once you understand that we can produce only one parsimonious consistent and correspondent frame: operations, that provides universal commensurability, you understand why all frames like all theories, like stories, are weak analogies, self delusions, or frauds. There is only one ‘way of thinking’ (frame) that consists of truth, and an infinite number of frames that are weak, delusional or fraudulent. Why? because we evolved to negotiate, not to speak the truth. We must learn to speak the truth as a means of calculation, just as we must learn to calculate using every OTHER method of calculation. This is why postmodernism and every other disciplinary, cult, ideological, and private vocabulary is just fraud at some degree of scale.

  • All Speech Is Measurement,

    October 11th, 2018 6:52 AM ALL SPEECH IS MEASUREMENT, ALL STATEMENTS TRANSACTIONS. BUT MEASUREMENT OF WHAT? You know, the material universe seemed complicated until we discovered the atomic structure and created the periodic table of the elements. The same is true for the Grammars. Once you understand the grammars, all speech is as open to inspection and comprehension on its structure alone. Once you understand that we can produce only one parsimonious consistent and correspondent frame: operations, that provides universal commensurability, you understand why all frames like all theories, like stories, are weak analogies, self delusions, or frauds. There is only one ‘way of thinking’ (frame) that consists of truth, and an infinite number of frames that are weak, delusional or fraudulent. Why? because we evolved to negotiate, not to speak the truth. We must learn to speak the truth as a means of calculation, just as we must learn to calculate using every OTHER method of calculation. This is why postmodernism and every other disciplinary, cult, ideological, and private vocabulary is just fraud at some degree of scale.