1) Our civilization has succeeded because it’s been eugenic in every era – right up until the industrial revolution.
2) We find you disgusting.
3) and its because you’re unfit.
4) and you are unfit because you lack agency.
5) and you lack agency because you’re still undomesticated.
6) and as undomesticated still an animal.
7) and it isn’t any more complicated than that.
8) we cannot cooperate with you on equal terms any more than we can cooperate with any other animal – you lack the agency.
9) We don’t grant barn animals equality which is why we don’t grant you equality. And we don’t want barn animals in our homes, business, or our commons.
10) This is what we mean when we want to separate from you.
Conservatism is not an intellectual movement. It is a pre rational, sentimental and traditional one. AND I WILL CHANGE THAT FOREVER. The logic, science, and history of our people in rational prose.
The only other substantial non-neocon intellectual on the right is Buchanan. Conservatism is not an intellectual movement. It is a pre rational, sentimental and traditional one. AND I WILL CHANGE THAT FOREVER. The logic, science, and history of our people in rational prose.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
We don’t want populists. We want men who will fight, or men who will win arguments. Those who are fearful lack the agency to participate. I am an elitist on the behalf of our people. I do not require their approval to work in their interests.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
I don’t want anything other than to prohibit ignorance, error, bias, fictionalism, and deceit, and thereby end the extermination of our people by abuse of our people’s high trust (christian) naivety. Christianity is a sucker’s bait.
I mean, if you are a child, a pet, or a domesticated animal, unable to carry the peerage of sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, law and markets, and as such must escape a reality for which you are unfit, then I am sure that your betters will provide it for you.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
You mean, we don’t advocate for masturbation, daydreaming, escapism, fantasy, supernatural, drugs, because we advocate for mindfulness by training, socialization, fitness, and responsibility? That your family, your people, your world, and your universe are not enough inspiration?
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
1 – I do my work out in the open with my real name. I always have.
2 – I educate our people on how to produce and implement a restoration of the constitution that will allow us reclaim our destiny by constitutional amendment, and certainty of members of the state the rebellion to enact it – or to cause secession between those who do and do not wish so.
3 – I do this to provide an actionable solution that will prevent the bloodiest civil war in human history that is one spark from igniting, and one that has been deterministic since the 1965 socialist transition of immigration from kin to aliens.
4 – I NEVER EVER cross the line to advocacy or organization or participation in direct action. I seek only to make our people understand that if we did choose to revolt that our success is a virtual certainty and therefore to make the state end its denial that we would.
5 – If you cannot do the same then I can’t be associated with you, and I don’t want to. You are a danger to me and our people
6 – All ‘secret’ activity only attracts the wrong people, with the wrong incentives, to engaging in the wrong behaviors, that will end in their and our harm.
7 – All any action by the state against me as a thought leader working on restoration of the constitution to prevent its usurpation, and the creation of policies in the defense of our people from economic, cultural, and genetic predation would only serve to demonstrate to the people we seek to reach the corruption of that government, and in turn grant additional legitimacy to both the promise of my work, and the promise of our ability to force our self defense into the body of law.
8 – If we must, at some future time, act, then we must and will act toward a moral end, with an actionable plan, and all act at once. And in the interim we must constraint all lunatics from preventing our expansion into the majority and the provision of solutions for the vast majority of our people – exclusive of those fools, traitors and enemies among them.
9 – Only the more sophisticated followers understand how I use the ‘marketplace’ of the internet to criticize ideas, whittle away at them, and discover those few grains of truth therein. Only the more sophisticated followers understand how I use the king of the hill game to run those tests. At any given time I might be testing any set of ideas by king of the hill games, to get you to defeat them so that I understand how to replace those ideas with better ones. I don’t want you to understand what I am doing. If you undrestand I am playing this game, and running these tests, then their utility declines. The secret to any psychological testing is to work indirectly by appealing to people’s intuitions such that their natural tendency to signal rather than report is circumvented. This is is how I work. I create games that indirectly allow me to discover possibilities. I do not start with presumptions, I simply start with what is presumed, and attack it until only a few grains of truth remain. With those gains of truth I then reconstruct the law. What we do with that law is up to us – should we obtain the power to enforce its adoption. And I must convince you only that we both have the power, and that the laws once enacted will serve our purposes. This means that all my work was in the construction of the law, the rest is only the policy we enact by that law, and the incentives of citizens to use the law to suppress, defeat, or exit those who continue the 2500 year war against our people.
Thank you for your time.
-Curt Doolittle
======
FROMl: thisisnotmyemail@hotmail.com
REGARDING: https://ordoevangelistarum.com/
Sir, I love your thoughts but am not happy with your boomer-tier tools. Thomas Lewis from Ordo Evangelistarum has the right ideas when it comes to implementing websites, forums, and comms. He only uses open source programs that have been rigorously tested. He is also friends with some honorable computer nerds that help him out.
You use gmail. For the love of god, why? I’m not emailing you only to be flagged by the crazed technocrats at google for not thinking like them. Discord is run by a bunch of SJWs who do not share anything with you in common either. Once again, I wont be using discord.
Open source alternatives like OE is using.
1) comms. Riot app using decentralized matrix servers. Thomas has his own server which he controls. I prefer servers in third world countries because why not.
2) Forum. He uses Discord which is simple and effective and once again, you control it yourself.
At least use some free tools that arent made around collecting user data to sell. Other than that, my respect for you overrides any disdain I have for your boomer tech strategy.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51816572_10156975527472264_9083460109933215744_o_10156975527467264.jpg HOW TO ANSWER GSRRM CRITICISMS
(Do not treat all our people as equal in agency.)Christian KalafutI do think that it’s too materialistic – not even the Hellenes were this materialist in pholosophy (depending on who you read)Feb 9, 2019, 4:27 PMCurt Doolittlewell you are a dishonest advocate for supernatural authoritarianism and the continued imprisonment and conquest of our people by our eternal enemy.Feb 9, 2019, 4:29 PMChristian KalafutThis was no denunciation curtFeb 9, 2019, 4:29 PMChristian KalafutBut while in theory its about markets, and often times in practice, I think therr is more to the breath of life then material goods.Feb 9, 2019, 4:30 PMCurt DoolittleOnly because you are an addict defending your addiction.Feb 9, 2019, 4:30 PMCurt DoolittleChristian Kalafut not an argument. You think many false and foolish things. Why would what you think matter?Feb 9, 2019, 4:30 PMCurt DoolittleI mean, youi’re a liar and a carrier of lies. I only don’t block you to mock you.Feb 9, 2019, 4:31 PMChristian KalafutI say things you disagree with but many things I do say you happen to agreeFeb 9, 2019, 4:31 PMChristian KalafutYou’ve shared quotes of mine (earnestly) on your wall.Feb 9, 2019, 4:32 PMChristian KalafutPhilosophers do not always agreeFeb 9, 2019, 4:33 PMChristian KalafutDiedrot had many a skirmish with Voltaire.Feb 9, 2019, 4:33 PMChristian KalafutThe spirit and ethos of ehst your saying is very Voltairian.Feb 9, 2019, 4:34 PMGreg HamiltonI’m not sure how all of reality, your nation and people, and your family is “materialistic”
I mean if you can’t find inspiration for being in all of that I don’t see how an invisible man is going to help any.Feb 9, 2019, 4:35 PMCurt DoolittleHalf truths are still half lies, and you are nothing but a sophist, supernaturalist, and liar, and a threat to the survival of our people.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day. I do not care if madmen or my enemy says something useful. The origin of information has no bearing on its truth content. That would be contra falsificationary.
You are still a dishonest apologist for christianity, and I only call myself a philosopher to avoid confusion. As far as I know what I do is a science of the law (cooperation).
You are not a philosopher. The requirement to make that claim requires a system of thought. Or publication of an amendment to a system of thought. there are many people who write philosophy or philosophize (rationalise) but that tells us nothing. As far as I know philosophy is dead, and the evidence is it’s inclusion in religion rather than math, logic, science, engineering, economics, law.
There is nothing ‘voluntarian’ it is simplyr eciprocity under the rule of law of the anglo saxons and their germanic ancestors, and the european IE expansion before them.
All you do is waste my time and provide vehicles for how others can conduct arguments against others such fictionalists.
;)Feb 9, 2019, 4:40 PMCurt Doolittleit’s more that ‘if you can’t find inspiration in that, then you are dead weight and an ongoing threat to our people’s survival.”Feb 9, 2019, 4:44 PMSteven KolpekCoding an Ideal for Propertarianism? [Live up to your forefather’s by defending your future]?Feb 9, 2019, 4:45 PMRichard HeathenGSRRM?Feb 9, 2019, 4:46 PMChristian KalafutI am talking about the 18th century philosopher Voltaire, not “voluntary”Feb 9, 2019, 4:56 PMChristian KalafutYou see I am an historian and a musician/lyricist first and foremost.Feb 9, 2019, 4:58 PMChristian KalafutI think that you dwell too much on my faith rather than the Truth of what I am saying.Feb 9, 2019, 4:59 PMChristian KalafutWhat I am saying is what you believe, is nothing new in Western history; most of the upper classes of West Europe carried views, though less systematized and apportioned, very similar to yours. The view that there was a ‘thousand years of darkness between Julian and the Enlightenment” is an old, tired meme; in terms of Historiography it’s purely a Gibbonian smear and a rejection of History as it actually was.Feb 9, 2019, 5:04 PMGreg HamiltonCurt Doolittle and honestly people can believe in whatever they want in private.Feb 9, 2019, 5:08 PMCurt DoolittleGood point. Thank you . I always assume everyone presumes that and I shouldn’t. sorry.Feb 9, 2019, 5:12 PMGreg HamiltonI think these critics may think you’re saying that. But I’ve never heard that. Just that invisible men in the sky don’t get to be part of the law.Feb 9, 2019, 5:19 PMAlexander ByronNot worth engaging in my opinion. Those comments are just noise, if one keeps listening to them, they will drown in said noise.Feb 9, 2019, 5:27 PMCurt DoolittleWhat’s wrong with materialism is meritocracy. Fictions, Supernaturalism and Sophism, and pseudoscience and their conflations provide an alternative mental model in which one’s lower status and therefore mindfulness is not continuously challenged daily evidence in reality.Feb 9, 2019, 5:34 PMAlain DwightGuilt, shame, rally, ridicule, mock.. something like that.
What the left does instead of making arguments or developing agency.Feb 9, 2019, 5:37 PMGreg HamiltonCurt Doolittle nice. True. “If only” becomes the excuse for lack of success
This is where communists, libertarians, objectivists etc all meet. Their beliefs require “if just only everybody would”Feb 9, 2019, 5:39 PMAlain Dwight*G is for gossipFeb 9, 2019, 5:47 PMCurt Doolittlegossip, shaming, ralling, ridiculing, and moralizing.
in other words, demonstrating female disapproval.Feb 9, 2019, 5:49 PMChristian KalafutMaterialistic outlook is what got the commons into this mess in first place; I am not decrying the benifets that it has given us but such a way of viewing the world leads to ideologies like Marxism or Communism or things like the Party of Davos.Feb 9, 2019, 5:52 PMChristian KalafutRampant materialism and decadence what is killing our civilization the most right now. Remember that the houses of the leading men of Athens during the golden age were sparsley furnished in comparison to the decadent furnishings of the later Roman Republic. In fact, the sparser furnishing of the Athenian household is one of the many measures of brilliance in the history of that period.Feb 9, 2019, 5:56 PMRichard HeathenOk so rallying and shamingFeb 9, 2019, 5:58 PMCJ CarverChristian Kalafut If you could give yourself a smoker, would you do it?Feb 9, 2019, 6:10 PMBryan Nova BreyYour responses are highbrow hilarious.Feb 9, 2019, 6:19 PMAlain DwightMoralizing, that really ties it together.Feb 9, 2019, 6:55 PMEric BurkettI do not view truth as a materialistic desire, but as an idealistic construct to impose with the side effect of creating markets that optimize human interaction, reducing transactional costs and creating the conditions for affluence in many ways, not just resource accumulation.Feb 9, 2019, 7:20 PMSteven KolpekDoesn’t “ridicule” fall under “shame”? I liked the 4-letter acronym better.
Gossip (slander, libel, defame)
Shaming (ridicule, humiliate, chastize)
Rallying (appeal to audience, dogpile)
Moralizing (good vs. evil)Feb 9, 2019, 7:36 PMThomas NorgateCharlie Eddleston-Haynes Caspian Lipman-England Robert Henke this guy on the money againFeb 11, 2019, 8:41 AMHOW TO ANSWER GSRRM CRITICISMS
The evidence is that families guard their status jealously and that fratricide and patricide are the most common origins of regicide.
Secondly, a monarchy has only to defend the very longest term interest and its income from the overall performance of the polity.
Monarchies have exceptional records for almost all of human history with the fragility not one of nepotism (since a monarchy has management teams selected from across the realm, many of whom are the best shareholders), but monarchies fail because agrarian production was the only means of competition and therefore territorial expansion the only means of competition. And territorial expansion only achievable by the high risk and high cost of european warfare and consequent ransom.
The monarchies simply DID NOT KNOW WHAT TO DO when the landed and military aristocracy was replaced by the commercial aristocracy, and after the french revolution, the church aristocracy replaced by the state bureaucracy.
We know what to do: Increase participation to shift, then decrease participation once shifted. Increase participation by expanding the franchise for each additional class, or decrease the franchise for each additional class once the change has been implemented. During that era guns were far more effective at forcing political change than archers. So the state could no longer use professional warriors to deny the franchise.
The only solution is to retain the franchise for those who have demonstrated interests in the preservation of rule of law and the discretion of the monarchy, the republic, or the democracy in the determination of the production of commons.
THere no longer a force on earth that can occupy territory against men with small arms (battle rifles) and rpg’s (close proximity man-portable artillery). It cannot be done. Ergo the transition is complete and we have restored the symmetry of power between men.
WE need only choose to impose our will on those who would deprive us of rule of law, and the reciprocity that rule of law both depends upon and enforces.
It is very hard to read Hoppe, Michels, and Burnham (or machiavelli for that matter) and not understand this.
