Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • No The Universe is (exists as) not a ‘mind’

    —“How do you demonstrate that the universe is a mind?”—Sam McPhail

    [F]or the equivalent to calculation to exist requires possibilities (disequilibrium). For mind to exist requires and a means of storing state, and (a) prediction, (b) permutation (c) choice (d) action from a history of states. The function of what we call mind is to allow us to predict candidate actions such that we can outwit the determinism of the universe and capture the energy thereby resisting entropy. How the universe or anything in the universe can do something, or anything, close to ‘mind’ would require we discover the means of information storage and the means of using that information storage, and the possibilities predictive using it, and the means of selecting choices from those possibilities, and the means of acting to seize those opportunities (choices), for some purpose (caloric gain). As far as I know the universe is purely operational (limited in transactions) at every scale. And that our current ignorance because of our inability to measure (observe), has left us uncertainty as to whether the universe and its contents are the same or separate things, and whether there is one or many, and whether they are interdependent (frothing so to speak).

  • No The Universe is (exists as) not a ‘mind’

    —“How do you demonstrate that the universe is a mind?”—Sam McPhail

    [F]or the equivalent to calculation to exist requires possibilities (disequilibrium). For mind to exist requires and a means of storing state, and (a) prediction, (b) permutation (c) choice (d) action from a history of states. The function of what we call mind is to allow us to predict candidate actions such that we can outwit the determinism of the universe and capture the energy thereby resisting entropy. How the universe or anything in the universe can do something, or anything, close to ‘mind’ would require we discover the means of information storage and the means of using that information storage, and the possibilities predictive using it, and the means of selecting choices from those possibilities, and the means of acting to seize those opportunities (choices), for some purpose (caloric gain). As far as I know the universe is purely operational (limited in transactions) at every scale. And that our current ignorance because of our inability to measure (observe), has left us uncertainty as to whether the universe and its contents are the same or separate things, and whether there is one or many, and whether they are interdependent (frothing so to speak).

  • The Origins of Individualism

    —“Individualism” properly defined, as the mutual respect of humans for each other’s direct connection to God …”—

    [I] don’t know where that comes from, but as far as I now individualism in the marxist, postmodern sense is relatively recent invention, with the unique western tradition of individual sovereignty under rule of law the origin of what we group under the term individualism. We often conflate that with christian consideration (care) for the individual and christian tolerance for the individual. But we prohibited collective punishment, created law for the individual not family, and created policy for the intergenerational family. Civilizations all talk about their via-positivas but they cooperate by their via-negativas instead. The purpose of a via-positiva as far as I know is to circumvent the via-negativa, and by habituation, remove it from cognition (metaphysical presumptions).

  • The Origins of Individualism

    —“Individualism” properly defined, as the mutual respect of humans for each other’s direct connection to God …”—

    [I] don’t know where that comes from, but as far as I now individualism in the marxist, postmodern sense is relatively recent invention, with the unique western tradition of individual sovereignty under rule of law the origin of what we group under the term individualism. We often conflate that with christian consideration (care) for the individual and christian tolerance for the individual. But we prohibited collective punishment, created law for the individual not family, and created policy for the intergenerational family. Civilizations all talk about their via-positivas but they cooperate by their via-negativas instead. The purpose of a via-positiva as far as I know is to circumvent the via-negativa, and by habituation, remove it from cognition (metaphysical presumptions).

  • Democracy is somewhere between a limited luxury good and a catastrophic means of

    Democracy is somewhere between a limited luxury good and a catastrophic means of hyperconsumption of accumulated civilizational capital in all its forms. We are wealthy because of what remains of rule of law, and the germanic rule of law. The ultimate achievement of our politics.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 17:28:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175099312990240768

    Reply addressees: @willwilkinson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175098799187988480

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @willwilkinson You have no moral foundation for dysgenia, capital consumption, population expansion, or redistribution over investment in the productivity of commons. You simply use sentimental appeal to sell false promise to those whose existence is carried entirely by white men over 35.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175098799187988480

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @willwilkinson You have no moral foundation for dysgenia, capital consumption, population expansion, or redistribution over investment in the productivity of commons. You simply use sentimental appeal to sell false promise to those whose existence is carried entirely by white men over 35.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175098799187988480

  • You have no moral foundation for dysgenia, capital consumption, population expan

    You have no moral foundation for dysgenia, capital consumption, population expansion, or redistribution over investment in the productivity of commons. You simply use sentimental appeal to sell false promise to those whose existence is carried entirely by white men over 35.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 17:26:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175098799187988480

    Reply addressees: @willwilkinson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175098311650549760

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @willwilkinson For example what is the cost of one point of aggregate IQ? What is the cost of loss of rule of law? So if The President is trying to retain, and capital, and rule of law that produces it, by using power, then it is the peaceful alternative to the Right’s restoration by violence.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175098311650549760

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @willwilkinson For example what is the cost of one point of aggregate IQ? What is the cost of loss of rule of law? So if The President is trying to retain, and capital, and rule of law that produces it, by using power, then it is the peaceful alternative to the Right’s restoration by violence.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175098311650549760

  • For example what is the cost of one point of aggregate IQ? What is the cost of l

    For example what is the cost of one point of aggregate IQ? What is the cost of loss of rule of law? So if The President is trying to retain, and capital, and rule of law that produces it, by using power, then it is the peaceful alternative to the Right’s restoration by violence.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 17:24:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175098311650549760

    Reply addressees: @willwilkinson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175097755993329664

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @willwilkinson Well that’s not quite true right? Violence is a resource. Power is a resource. The question is only whether that resource can be put to good(production of capital) or ill (consumption or loss of capital). How would you measure the capital losses under your neoliberalism?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175097755993329664

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @willwilkinson Well that’s not quite true right? Violence is a resource. Power is a resource. The question is only whether that resource can be put to good(production of capital) or ill (consumption or loss of capital). How would you measure the capital losses under your neoliberalism?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175097755993329664

  • The Reciprocal decision is secession and separation. However, the irreciprocal d

    The Reciprocal decision is secession and separation.
    However, the irreciprocal decision will end in your defeat. Every simulation and war game ends with right success:
    Politicide. Not enthnocide. Politicide.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-19 17:08:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174731882119991296

    Reply addressees: @willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174730661237862400

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke So it’s not a matter of ‘rights’. It’s a matter of war.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174730661237862400

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @willwilkinson @nytopinion @BetoORourke So it’s not a matter of ‘rights’. It’s a matter of war.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174730661237862400

  • The problem isn’t Government, its the Constitution, Rights, Processes, Incentive

    The problem isn’t Government, its the Constitution, Rights, Processes, Incentives and Standing to Prosecute violations of Rule of Law by the Natural Law of Reciprocity (Tort). Restore the market for prosecution of treason, defamation, deceit.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-19 16:03:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174715598485491714

    Reply addressees: @RedbeardWrath @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174715553128361986

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @RedbeardWrath @TOOEdit Revolution, Restoration, Reformation, Restitution.
    Never has an empire been so fragile, a people so motivated, and the means so available.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174715553128361986

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @RedbeardWrath @TOOEdit Revolution, Restoration, Reformation, Restitution.
    Never has an empire been so fragile, a people so motivated, and the means so available.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174715553128361986

  • Additionally, conservatives find disgust (impurity) in mind, word, and deed into

    Additionally, conservatives find disgust (impurity) in mind, word, and deed intolerable, and this is what unites us against the left: they’re disgusting. Why? They ruin the commons, including the genetic.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 23:35:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174467118341001221

    Reply addressees: @UDepravity @gurugeorgey @Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174466649598103552

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @UDepravity @gurugeorgey @Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer The problem is that the female mind (left, consumption), ascendent male mind (libertarian, production), and established male mind (conservative, conservation) differ in their moral instincts. Proportionality and equality for the female and Reciprocity and hierarchy for the male.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174466649598103552

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @UDepravity @gurugeorgey @Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer The problem is that the female mind (left, consumption), ascendent male mind (libertarian, production), and established male mind (conservative, conservation) differ in their moral instincts. Proportionality and equality for the female and Reciprocity and hierarchy for the male.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174466649598103552