Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • That would mean the NAP is false. The NAP is derived from Tort (Tresspass, the u

    That would mean the NAP is false.
    The NAP is derived from Tort (Tresspass, the universal cause of retaliation ) which is, quite obviously, the evidence of all dispute resolution across all of history.
    All that differs is the scope of what can be trespassed against without…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-13 21:13:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779256578467610756

    Reply addressees: @ViandeTiede666 @AutistocratMS @josh61597760 @GiwdulBielsira @FerghaneA @PLIB_fr @Cobra_FX_ @PBlanrue @arthurhomines @NIMH_Rage @RageCultureMag @Doomit_Doomit @PaduStream @Etienne_Chouard @ObjectivismeFR @cercle_cobalt @Bunker_D_ @JRochedy @MonsieurPhi @liberteadoree @fare @VillonAdam @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779254426143985925

  • Fahrenheit vs Celsius Debate: 1) Because mercury is the measure rather than wate

    Fahrenheit vs Celsius Debate:
    1) Because mercury is the measure rather than water, because mercury doesn’t freeze. It makes perfect sense. 😉
    2) Fahrenheit originally defined his scale with zero as the coldest temperature achievable using a mixture of ice, water, and salt. This solution of brine was used to establish the freezing point of water. So Fahrenheit is a more accurate measure of the lower limit of water’s natural ability to freeze. It makes perfect sense.
    3) Fahrenheit is more precise at human scales of temperature sesitivity without having to resort to decimal numbers. We should ask the other question as why Celsius didn’t use 0-1000 instead of 0-100 given the sensitivity of humans to gradual changes in temperature. As such Fahrenheit makes perfect sense.
    4) unlike measures of length and volume we don’t require a base ten measurement of temperature because we don’t need to manage scale independence.
    5) I find the entire debate ridiculous. The imperial system uses human scale measurements for human scale actions. The Celsius system is easier to use for beyond-human scale measurements (science), because it’s a consistent base ten set of measurements.

    Reply addressees: @05HAWKI

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-13 14:54:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779161245075079168

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778982793717895217

  • Free-riding is a form of theft because it involves benefiting from a resource or

    Free-riding is a form of theft because it involves benefiting from a resource or service without contributing to its cost, thereby imposing an irreciprocal burden on those who do pay. Here are some reasons why free-riding is often seen as a type of theft:

    Exploitation of collective goods: Free-riders exploit goods or services that are collectively funded or maintained, such as public infrastructure, social services, or environmental resources. By using these resources without contributing, they are essentially stealing from the collective.

    Irreciprocal cost distribution: When some people free-ride, the costs of providing the resource or service must be borne by a smaller group of contributors. This leads to an unfair distribution of costs and can make the provision of the resource or service unsustainable in the long run.

    Violation of reciprocity: Societies operate on the principle of reciprocity, where people are expected to contribute in proportion to the benefits they receive. Free-riding violates this principle by taking benefits without giving anything in return.

    Depletion of resources: Free-riding leads to the overuse or depletion of scarce resources, as people have no incentive to conserve or use them efficiently. This is a form of theft from current and future generations who may be deprived of the resource.

    Undermining of social cooperation: Free-riding erodes trust and cooperation in a society, as people become reluctant to contribute to collective goods if they believe others are not doing their fair share. This leads to a breakdown of social institutions and a loss of social capital.

    Reply addressees: @ViandeTiede666 @AutistocratMS @josh61597760 @GiwdulBielsira @FerghaneA @PLIB_fr @Cobra_FX_ @_ThDa @PBlanrue @arthurhomines @NIMH_Rage @RageCultureMag @Doomit_Doomit @PaduStream @Etienne_Chouard @ObjectivismeFR @cercle_cobalt @Bunker_D_ @JRochedy @MonsieurPhi @liberteadoree @fare @VillonAdam @whatifalthist

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-12 23:58:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778935679663144960

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778933904830869788

  • Common failure of false premises. Claims verbal argument pursuit of truth under

    Common failure of false premises.
    Claims verbal argument pursuit of truth under pre-established consent to reciprocity, instead of verbal negotiation under presumption of possibility of violence.

    In other words, Hoppe’s argument, a derivation of marxist argument by hoppe’s mentor, Habermas, and like most of rothbardian libertarianism is circular because it assumes its conclusion in its false premise. Once you recognize that all rothbardian ethics are circular by this same method you will grasp that you too. have been suckered by the feminine > jewish > abrahamic > marxist sequence of seduction into false promise by baiting into hazard via positiva, and sedition by undermining using critique via negativa.

    I don’t err. There is a reason I left MI and PFS behind as failed programs when you were still a child. And there is a reason the Rothbardians are afraid of me. It’s because I am correct. Rothbardianism is a sophistry of middle class marxism – a means of evading European natural law of reciprocity, and the demand for capialization of the commons that disambiguates diasporic separatist and middle eastern low trust ethics, from territorial federated European high trust ethics.

    That you don’t know this is just your lack of experience in the field. And don’t feel bad. This technique of deception is as sophisticated as the european techniques of truth discovery. In fact that is why the feminine -to – abrahamic – to.- marxist sequence was originatelly invented: as resistance against greek reason and the superiority of the indo europeans whether persian or greco-roman.

    Reply addressees: @StephaneGeyres @GiwdulBielsira @FerghaneA @PLIB_fr @ViandeTiede666 @Cobra_FX_ @_ThDa @PBlanrue @arthurhomines @NIMH_Rage @RageCultureMag @Doomit_Doomit @PaduStream @Etienne_Chouard @ObjectivismeFR @cercle_cobalt @Bunker_D_ @JRochedy @MonsieurPhi @liberteadoree @fare @VillonAdam

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-12 02:21:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778609241277779968

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778599486069121128

  • Does it? Or does it mean that the cost of taking your life, property, women, chi

    Does it? Or does it mean that the cost of taking your life, property, women, chi

    Does it? Or does it mean that the cost of taking your life, property, women, children, livestock, and other assets is a matter of the ratio of violence and risk of it’s consequence? It’s the latter. In other words, Hoppe’s argument it circular.

    Here, from first principles… https://t.co/tQuh7llt2J

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-12 00:26:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778580367231869251

    Reply addressees: @ViandeTiede666 @RageCultureMag @GiwdulBielsira @FerghaneA @PLIB_fr @StephaneGeyres @Cobra_FX_ @_ThDa @PBlanrue @arthurhomines @NIMH_Rage @Doomit_Doomit @PaduStream @Etienne_Chouard @ObjectivismeFR @cercle_cobalt @Bunker_D_ @JRochedy @MonsieurPhi @liberteadoree @fare @VillonAdam

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778563371639374197

  • Disagreement is not an argument. I agree on the desirability of it and the utili

    Disagreement is not an argument.
    I agree on the desirability of it and the utility of limiting underclass fertility. But as I’ve said, UBI is economically impossible. There simply isn’t enough tax possible to accomplish it. And attempting it would cause the same flight we’ve…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-10 11:56:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778029359724458308

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778027229223764076

  • Nope. And VAT is the most destructive tax of all and hampers all production dist

    Nope. And VAT is the most destructive tax of all and hampers all production distribution and consumption.
    It can’t happen. Even if it did all that would occur is mortgage rates and housing rent would increase to absorb it.

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-10 11:37:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778024576867250305

    Reply addressees: @arqiduka @HarmfulOpinion @ConceptualJames @JonMunitz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778022499349115365

  • “Denying other people’s lived experiences is called gaslighting.”–@wordy_fiend

    –“Denying other people’s lived experiences is called gaslighting.”–@wordy_fiend
    I’m not sure that’s true. What you’re saying is that truth is subjective rather than the objective means of decidability when perceptions, values, and opinions conflict.
    Gaslighting requires not denial of experience but UNDERMINING the causes of and interpretations of that experience as presumed by the individual.
    There are plenty of false experiences, stemming from false presumptions of cause, or stemming from mental psychological and mental defect – primarily neuroticism and infantilization.
    There are also plenty of experiences stemming from true presumptions of cause, and stemming from correct identification of those causes, and the correct mental, psychological and emotional reaction to them.
    In other words, gaslighting is lying by the use of projection and suggestion. Correcting others when they are wrong, emotionally troubled, or immature is simply doing the moral duty of coercing others to mature into responsible adults.

    Reply addressees: @wordy_fiend @TheBibleIsTrue @MikhailaFuller

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-09 18:24:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777764507953049601

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777761065839059083

  • I’M NOT ANTI CHRISTIAN I’m anti-abrahamism (lying), not anti christian (Jesus).

    I’M NOT ANTI CHRISTIAN
    I’m anti-abrahamism (lying), not anti christian (Jesus).
    If you want fundamentalism, you need to learn to lie to justify it. Learning the very simple lesson Jesus teaches takes not rationalization, justification, mysticism, supernaturalism, fiction, fraud, or lying.
    Jesus solve the problem of the prisoner’s dilemma of cooperation by demanding the counter intuitive: seduction non aggression and by forgiveness into cooperation for mutual benefit: the extension of kinship love to all.
    This made it possible for the primitive people of the middle east and the lower classes in the west, to find status, self image, self respect, and mindfulness without the wealth, power, ability of the upper classes of aristocratic warriors.
    The Jeffersonian bible is sufficient, and doesn’t require lying to your self, others, or social construction of falsehoods.
    It may be that some percentage of the people require the supernatural to sedate their neuroticism enough to obtain mindfulness. However the vast majority will not reject Christianity or natural law or Western philosophy, or Western science once they understand that Jesus’ solution was the only possible answer to achieving cooperation between the underclasses at the scale and under the technology of Greco Roman Civilization and the rate of change it imposed on the civilizations that had been static for three thousand years.

    Affections all.
    CD

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 22:30:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777464140862230528

  • “Am I going too far calling Libertarian ideology: Predatory female?”– No you’re

    –“Am I going too far calling Libertarian ideology: Predatory female?”–

    No you’re not going too far.
    The entire sequence of:
    First Generation: Supernaturalism:
    Female
    … Feminine
    … … Jewish
    … … … Abrahamic > Judaism > Christian > Muslim
    Second Generation: Pseudoscience and Sophistry
    Lower Class Marxism (Labor)
    … Cultural Marxism (Ethnicity)
    … … Race Marxism (race)
    … … … Sex Marxism (feminism)
    … … … … Truth Marxism (postmodernism)
    … … … … … Language Marxism (Polit.-correct/Woke)
    … … … Middle Class Marxism (Libertarianism)
    … … … Upper Class Marxism (Neoconservatism)
    … … … … Globalist Marxism (Financial Globalism)
    … all rely on the same “monopoly” and “Authoritarian Control” (do it one way) because of low trust and low systematizing, and uncompetitive nature of those groups in each domain they seek to undermine.
    This strategy of underminine (see my work on sex differences) is simply the application of the feminine means of warfare, predation, parasitism, and undermining to large scale through social construction using mass production of propaganda.

    Reply addressees: @Dontcar25448459

    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 20:35:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777435058900508672

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777429191014621198