American Eugenics was the MOST moral movement in human history. And yes, I’m happy to debate it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-30 15:33:00 UTC
Form: Argument
-
We do not presume women agency, and we shouldn’t presume those groups with femal
We do not presume women agency, and we shouldn’t presume those groups with female cognition any more agency than we do women.
The Tribe cannot think otherwise, any more than women – and for the same reason.
Truth is largely a masculine capacity, and truth before face more so.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-30 03:34:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200619197597794304
Reply addressees: @ClownBa73413423 @BretWeinstein
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200605343543246848
IN REPLY TO:
@FullAccountant
@curtdoolittle @BretWeinstein Too bad he will likely ignore your thoughtful criticism and not respond.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200605343543246848
-
We call it white collar crime, the problem is we don’t prosecute it because too
We call it white collar crime, the problem is we don’t prosecute it because too many profit from it, and the reason is simple: borrower vs lender beware in order to put hard money into a system to generate consumption that no longer contains hard money, nor increases consumption.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 19:39:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200499518246195200
Reply addressees: @thespandrell @hbdchick
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200258928686190597
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200258928686190597
-
So a) man creates descriptions of physical laws (applications of entropy), and b
So a) man creates descriptions of physical laws (applications of entropy), and b) man creates descriptions of natural laws (applications of reciprocity), c) judges discover those applications, and d) man issues command, legislation, and regulation, that are rarely if ever ‘law’.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 18:49:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200486966481080320
Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200486223434932230
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf Nature consists of constant relations.We can describe those constant relations.Math is the language of positional relations, logic of set relations, and operations of humanly possible subjectively testable actions. Law consists in the test of the MOST constant relations possible.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200486223434932230
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf Nature consists of constant relations.We can describe those constant relations.Math is the language of positional relations, logic of set relations, and operations of humanly possible subjectively testable actions. Law consists in the test of the MOST constant relations possible.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200486223434932230
-
It does right? Why? because people innovate constantly, and one of the ways they
It does right? Why? because people innovate constantly, and one of the ways they innovate is crime. Legal history consists of the record of man’s inventiveness in crime, and the law’s incremental suppression, with anglo (common) fastest to adapt.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 18:34:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200483280900018177
Reply addressees: @ArturBooth @KillerkattArt
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200482163537448963
IN REPLY TO:
@ArturBooth
@curtdoolittle @KillerkattArt @DegenRolf So, can law and theft exist in the same world?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200482163537448963
-
So it doesn’t matter what people think is good or agree is good what matters is
So it doesn’t matter what people think is good or agree is good what matters is that when in dispute science (law) provides decidability.
Well, art is decidable as is nearly everything.
There is no difference between science and law.
We just like lying and cheating … a lot.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 18:26:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200481292837629954
Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200480929418022918
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf So the test is not abstractions its cases. If you pick any case i will walk through it and you’ll see you’re engaged in theft and justifying it. Well, then I’ll equally justify your prosecution.
That’s what I do: law.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200480929418022918
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf So the test is not abstractions its cases. If you pick any case i will walk through it and you’ll see you’re engaged in theft and justifying it. Well, then I’ll equally justify your prosecution.
That’s what I do: law.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200480929418022918
-
So the test is not abstractions its cases. If you pick any case i will walk thro
So the test is not abstractions its cases. If you pick any case i will walk through it and you’ll see you’re engaged in theft and justifying it. Well, then I’ll equally justify your prosecution.
That’s what I do: law.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 18:25:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200480929418022918
Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200480756713349121
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf So again, the only reason to DISAGREE is to steal. Humans always and everywhere retaliate at high cost, against theft. I’m just explaining the world. If you don’t like it that isn’t material to me. I don’t do ‘good’ I do ‘true’.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200480756713349121
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf So again, the only reason to DISAGREE is to steal. Humans always and everywhere retaliate at high cost, against theft. I’m just explaining the world. If you don’t like it that isn’t material to me. I don’t do ‘good’ I do ‘true’.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200480756713349121
-
So again, the only reason to DISAGREE is to steal. Humans always and everywhere
So again, the only reason to DISAGREE is to steal. Humans always and everywhere retaliate at high cost, against theft. I’m just explaining the world. If you don’t like it that isn’t material to me. I don’t do ‘good’ I do ‘true’.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 18:24:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200480756713349121
Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200480326977572865
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf I’m just MEASURING CHANGES IN CAPITAL. It’s not an opinion. It’s just what exists. There is nothing undecidable by change in capital, any more than change in property, and as such, we see all peoples, all states, in all history operating by this test of reciprocity.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200480326977572865
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf I’m just MEASURING CHANGES IN CAPITAL. It’s not an opinion. It’s just what exists. There is nothing undecidable by change in capital, any more than change in property, and as such, we see all peoples, all states, in all history operating by this test of reciprocity.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200480326977572865
-
I’m just MEASURING CHANGES IN CAPITAL. It’s not an opinion. It’s just what exist
I’m just MEASURING CHANGES IN CAPITAL. It’s not an opinion. It’s just what exists. There is nothing undecidable by change in capital, any more than change in property, and as such, we see all peoples, all states, in all history operating by this test of reciprocity.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 18:23:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200480326977572865
Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200479793294262273
IN REPLY TO:
@KillerkattArt
@curtdoolittle @ArturBooth @DegenRolf You are the one insisting on specific terms and frameworks. Lol. Are there measures of insulation and protection? Yes. Are they self sufficient and unrelated to everything else? No. See, you have a box you’re comfortable playing in, but reality extends way beyond its walls.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200479793294262273
-
The world war was a continuation of the cycles of european civilizational balanc
The world war was a continuation of the cycles of european civilizational balances, which occur regularly, with thirty year or so periods of war, followed by reformations. AT present we are about to enter into another period of reformation. Outcome is uncertain.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 18:22:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200480047120953345
Reply addressees: @ArturBooth @KillerkattArt @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200479300836823040
IN REPLY TO:
@ArturBooth
@curtdoolittle @KillerkattArt @DegenRolf 1) I claim that World Wars are consequences of industrial revolution. I try not to play the “blame game” by invoking “great” personalities of the 20th century. Empiricism: Who is to blame?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200479300836823040