Curt Doolittle

Form: Argument

  • We have the most ignorant generation in almost two centuries for a reason: by de

    We have the most ignorant generation in almost two centuries for a reason: by design of the left to manufacture useful idiots under the postwar false promise that their evolutionary condition was a product of oppression rather than market value to others.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 02:01:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223788573297647616

    Reply addressees: @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223788257101721601

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto And the Left is desperately chasing the false promise that they can be free of genetic, sexual, social, economic and political market value in a world where the european civilizational windfall has been spent on dragging the world out of communism, socialism, and now islamism.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223788257101721601

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto And the Left is desperately chasing the false promise that they can be free of genetic, sexual, social, economic and political market value in a world where the european civilizational windfall has been spent on dragging the world out of communism, socialism, and now islamism.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223788257101721601

  • And the Left is desperately chasing the false promise that they can be free of g

    And the Left is desperately chasing the false promise that they can be free of genetic, sexual, social, economic and political market value in a world where the european civilizational windfall has been spent on dragging the world out of communism, socialism, and now islamism.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 02:00:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223788257101721601

    Reply addressees: @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223787777646612481

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto So, extending the franchise to non-propertied (non-business owners) was instituted as a means of choosing priorities for the allocation of scarce revenues to the production of commons in common interest. It was not an invitation to destroy the American experiment in a third way.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223787777646612481

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto So, extending the franchise to non-propertied (non-business owners) was instituted as a means of choosing priorities for the allocation of scarce revenues to the production of commons in common interest. It was not an invitation to destroy the American experiment in a third way.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223787777646612481

  • So, extending the franchise to non-propertied (non-business owners) was institut

    So, extending the franchise to non-propertied (non-business owners) was instituted as a means of choosing priorities for the allocation of scarce revenues to the production of commons in common interest. It was not an invitation to destroy the American experiment in a third way.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 01:58:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223787777646612481

    Reply addressees: @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223787121670049792

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto All NAXALT arguments are attempts at deception. Statements of distributions are true if they describe the area under the distribution. I don’t care about race but people vote almost entirely by it, and have made race an existential construct – in a war on the american experiment.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223787121670049792

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto All NAXALT arguments are attempts at deception. Statements of distributions are true if they describe the area under the distribution. I don’t care about race but people vote almost entirely by it, and have made race an existential construct – in a war on the american experiment.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223787121670049792

  • NO, SERVICE ISN’T ENOUGH. —“Curt, I’m sure you’d agree, some of our most galla

    NO, SERVICE ISN’T ENOUGH.

    —“Curt, I’m sure you’d agree, some of our most gallant, extraordinary soldiers, black & brown, native American, come from the worst of ghettos, in every state, every large or small city, maybe, speaking of history, even the war fighter in the tomb of the unknown came from there?”—

    Sure. Although the majority come from intergenerational military families. And sure, you can try to spin my work as other than ‘If you can’t fit into anglo rule-of-law middle class civilization, and you vote the left in to undermine it, then your military service is irrelevant.”

    All NAXALT arguments are attempts at deception. Statements of distributions are true if they describe the area under the distribution. I don’t care about race but people vote almost entirely by it, and have made race an existential construct – in a war on the american experiment.

    So, extending the franchise to non-propertied (non-business owners) was instituted as a means of choosing priorities for the allocation of scarce revenues to the production of commons in common interest. It was not an invitation to destroy the American experiment in a third way.

    And the Left is desperately chasing the false promise that they can be free of genetic, sexual, social, economic and political market value in a world where the european civilizational windfall has been spent on dragging the world out of communism, socialism, and now islamism.

    We have the most ignorant generation in almost two centuries for a reason: by design of the left to manufacture useful idiots under the postwar false promise that their evolutionary condition was a product of oppression rather than market value to others.

    And since evidence has falsified marxism, socialism, and science has falsified feminism, postmodernism, and denial of our substantial differences in gender, class, and race, other than invasive immigration the west would have survived the 20th century of social pseudoscience.

    So we can’t let you take the rest of us down with us.

    It’s over. The century of false promise is over. You killed democracy. And it will die with your names on it for eternity.

    There will be no second fall of the Roman Empire – this time by pseudoscience instead of theology.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 21:23:00 UTC

  • TO VIOLATE OUR SOVEREIGNTY IS TO INVITE US TO WAR See, you don’t get it. The onl

    TO VIOLATE OUR SOVEREIGNTY IS TO INVITE US TO WAR

    See, you don’t get it. The only reason not to conquer, deprive, exploit, enserf, enslave, or end – or worse, is reciprocity.

    You see, ‘sovereign means’ capable of defense – every man a sovereign: a king, a legislature, a knight, a husband, a craftsman and all else he might be.

    That is why natural law and international law are the same: because no man has say over another unless he violates the sovereignty of another – and if so then they may war. If they choose not to war they may duel. If they choose not to duel they may seek decision from the people in a jury. If they do not abide by the jury they have lost the insurance of their sovereign peers, and are limited to their own defense. And as such, they will easily be the victims of war by the polity rather than just their prior enemy.

    We are the men of Europa.

    We are sovereigns – all.

    And to violate that sovereignty is to invite us into war.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:45:00 UTC

  • THE ANGLO PEOPLES NEED WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS OF INVIOLABLE NATURAL LAW REQUIRING

    THE ANGLO PEOPLES NEED WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS OF INVIOLABLE NATURAL LAW REQUIRING TRANSACTIONAL CHANGES, AND THE PEOPLE NEED JURIDICAL DEFENSE AND THE LEGISLATURE NEEDS JURIDICAL ACCOUNTABILITY

    by Reece Haynes

    5 years in British politics (observing, theorizing, debating, practicing), proves everything you’ve said. The supremacy of Parliament is for nought when that Parliament is filled with the wrong people.

    And our unwritten constitution, plus the common law, is routinely disobeyed – with no sanctions applied by the judiciary.

    Not codifying the constitution, not maintaining the Empire, and not preserving the Aristotelian mixed model (hereditary monarchy and nobility, plus limited democracy) were all big mistakes.

    And then there’s the historical geopolitical mistakes which you also mention.

    —

    CD:

    The judicial novelties I’ve found are:

    1. The hereditary monarchy as a judge of last resort in defense against the fashions of the people, the malice of a minority, and the failure of the political process, is indispensable.

    2. The commonwealth model is to be embraced by any future american political order, with the monarchy representing the english speaking peoples.

    3. The British parliamentary and debate model is superior to the american.

    4. The British two (or more) Tiered legal system is superior to the american.

    5. The German Proportional Party System is superior to the British and american — allowing superior policy and superior adaptation.

    6. The requirement for strict construction from the first principle of reciprocity, specific statement of the scope(limit), and reference of any prior legislation , legislation, or finding of the court, upon which it depends.

    7. the requirement that the judiciary return the undecidable to the legislature thereby preventing legislation from the bench – and the mechanism for judiciary to require the legislature settle the matter in reasonable time

    8. The liability of legislators, regulators, and judges to warranty (hold involuntary liability) for their actions in so much that they do not violate the constitution of natural law.

    9. The vulnerability of legislators, regulators, judges and their agents to judicial prosecution for violations of the constitution.

    10. The vulnerability of the public to prosecution for advocation in public to the public in matters public, of violation of the constitution.

    11. The addition of involuntary warranty and therefor liability, for the entire scope of baiting into hazard upon which the 20th century deceits were constructed.

    12. The reversal of borrower beware to lender beware.

    13. Universal standing in matters of the commons

    14. Restoration of every man (citizen) a sheriff (deputy), defense of self, property and commons, restoration of extrajudicial punishment; the judicially sanctioned duel; and the sovereignty of men and as such their requirement to bear arms.

    15. The jewish-french cosmopolitan sponsored invasion of western civlization has destroyed our experiment in democracy – and universal democracy must and will end and we have proposed a set of options for polities to choose from, the easiest of which is multiple houses to maintain numbers, or fewer voters by much higher criteria, or lastly, kinship(ethnic) voters only.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:06:00 UTC

  • 1) Fascism was a nationalist(european) reaction to counter global (jewish) commu

    1) Fascism was a nationalist(european) reaction to counter global (jewish) communism.

    2) Fascism was conceived as french socialism, and the nazis came closest to implementing it – although today’s france is not far off. The period saw the decline of religion (darwin within memory) and rapid change, so in european tradition, fascism was another attempt at a secular theology of state, given the strange european desire for authority that is alien to anglos.

    3) China is perhaps the best example of a fascist state practicing monopoly authoritarianism, nationalism, insulation from ‘corrupting’ influences, information control, state corporatism, militarism, and extremely tight coupling between state, finance, and industry. (note that the chinese like the germans are very happy with this situation).

    In other words, Fascism won the 20th century. Period.

    4) I use the term “Market Fascism” in the sense that there is zero tolerance for extra market coercion anywhere under P. This was meant as a tongue in cheek response to Islamic Fascism vs “the white law”, and to cue the audience to the severity with which free riding, rent seeking, baiting into hazard, and all the other leftist techniques would be illegal – leaving only exchanges as a means of cooperating.

    5) One of the most contra-jewish-libertarian properties of fascism is that profit at the expense of the commons or people was not permitted. We confuse this with autarky, but it was more that abitrages were not permitted – which is what americans want as well. And if a resource would be short in the country by higher profits out, that sale would be prohibited. The other contra-jewish-libertarian property is that they ended interest for consumers, and that the success of state-private industrial alliances are always beneficial since capital intensive industry is always taking a credit risk that only the state can reduce. This is why I would prefer the USA and UK were investing in battery research and factories and keeping the profits rather than externalizing them to the private sector. This is a principle problem with that is not true elsewhere. We fund all this basic research with public money but it is then privatized. In other words, why is consumer interests and privatization of public research returns handed out to the investment class rather than diminishing tax burdens of the people?

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 13:54:00 UTC

  • I don’t argue against christian ethics (outcome) – I argue against abrahamism (j

    I don’t argue against christian ethics (outcome) – I argue against abrahamism (justification).

    I want them to be christians. I just don’t want them to argue with me by claiming that their preference for conveying Christian ethics is a truth or a necessity – It’s neither. it’s a good, and a preference. that’s fine. 😉 But theology isn’t true or even close to it. It’s a false and unwarrantable promise to bait you into following christian ethics.

    I just tell them that christianity when stated in scientific terms is in fact the scientific optimum ethics. The way that they argue it and justify it is rather ridiculous for those of us who are fine with the scientific truth being enough of a reason to act according to christian ethics.

    If you need different incentives to follow christian ethics that’s just a psychological difference. Otherwise, natural law and Christian ethics are the optimum.

    Largely, need for faith is a biological bias to empathy (feminine minds); need for theological argument is a biological bias for (weak) male minds. And the lack of need for faith is a biological basis for analytic (male) minds. And given that regardless of sex we almost all share some distribution of masculine and feminine biases.

    So no matter which reason you choose christianity: emotional faith, authoritarian rational, or scientific acknowledgment, all that matters is that people who AREN’T CHRISTIAN always and everywhere have more questionable (worse) ethics that are incompatible with western civilization.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 07:28:00 UTC

  • I just stick with (a) jesus’ teaching is reducible to five points, (b) the ten c

    I just stick with (a) jesus’ teaching is reducible to five points, (b) the ten commandments are just the law of tort, ( c) and europeans dont need to lie about either because we’ve always practiced sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, jury, tripartism, and aristocratic egalitarianism. It’s just that each of those ideas takes a standard deviation higher intelligence than the semitic religions to grasp. And that’s the net of it right there.

    There is no evidence people need faith. It’s a normative conclusion. People need a binding intergenerational narrative. It must have an embedded ambition. But most of the world did quite well before nonsense-religions. Ancestor worship and buddhism for the east, and ancestor worship and stoicism for the west are obvious examples.

    Jesus fits into the indo-european trinary religion just fine and if he had been included into the pantheon we wouldn’t have this problem – but the semites wanted to undermine the great, joyous, greco roman empire (and persian, and egyptian..) with a mandatory authoritarian universalist religoin so that they could encourage (warring, lying, cheating, malicious, awful) middle eastern tribal people.

    But judaism succeeded by separatism, and christianity failed among tribal people, and islam evolved out of a christan sect into a conquering rather than undermining version of abrahamism.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 07:12:00 UTC

  • This is why you see Einstein, Bohr, Cantor, Marx … all jewish thinkers … una

    This is why you see Einstein, Bohr, Cantor, Marx … all jewish thinkers … unable to get past description and into causation. Same for Male/Female. (Summers was right. There are ~no first place women – ever.) This is one of the great curiosities I hope genetics will unravel.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 23:52:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223031237171994631

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223030713034907649

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EricLiford Randomly pick a dozen books by the best ashkenazim and europeans. Compare their spoken vs written words. The ashkenazi have excelled in female cognitive dimorphism. The europeans have excelled in male cognitive dimorphism. Articulation-verbal vs Invention-existential (material)

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223030713034907649

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @EricLiford Randomly pick a dozen books by the best ashkenazim and europeans. Compare their spoken vs written words. The ashkenazi have excelled in female cognitive dimorphism. The europeans have excelled in male cognitive dimorphism. Articulation-verbal vs Invention-existential (material)

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223030713034907649