Form: Argument

  • Fiat Currency or “infinity” Money (Share-In-Economy Money) Is a Competitive Necessity.

    Mar 29, 2020, 12:34 PM

    —“Boomers hate crypto for some reason even though crypto still seems more real than printing infinity money.”—Avin Welleci

      Fiat Currency or “Infinity” money (share-in-economy money) is a competitive necessity. We can’t survive in a world economy without it. And we certainly can’t insure one another against disasters without it. Special Fiat Currency such as Food Stamp Money is extremely useful. There is no reason we don’t add ‘utility money, housing money’ as well. Conversely, Crypto money (token money) is a means of saving. And commodity money an even more fault tolerant means of saving – albeit a costly one. They all have their roles. I suspect it’s not occurring to you that the central issue is having one currency rather than multiple. Fiat Housing < Fiat Utility < Fiat Food < Fiat General < Digital Savings < Gold(commodity money). There is too little gold to serve as commodity money. Oil is too variable for commodity money. It’s possible to crate a basket of commodity money, from all the precious metals. My argument was that (a) crypto cannot serve as money substitute given current tech and costs of computing, (b) that self hosted crypto means the network is institutionally fragile (c) that a monolithic transaction system is faster, less fragile, and unassailable by the state. (d) the state will not tolerate the us of it for the reasons it was invented: drug money. Don’t assume boomer means bias (I’m a jones generation by the way – between boomers and x’s – like bill gates, steve jobs) It might mean (as it does in this case) i know more than you do. ’cause I do. 😉

  • Fiat Currency or “infinity” Money (Share-In-Economy Money) Is a Competitive Necessity.

    Mar 29, 2020, 12:34 PM

    —“Boomers hate crypto for some reason even though crypto still seems more real than printing infinity money.”—Avin Welleci

      Fiat Currency or “Infinity” money (share-in-economy money) is a competitive necessity. We can’t survive in a world economy without it. And we certainly can’t insure one another against disasters without it. Special Fiat Currency such as Food Stamp Money is extremely useful. There is no reason we don’t add ‘utility money, housing money’ as well. Conversely, Crypto money (token money) is a means of saving. And commodity money an even more fault tolerant means of saving – albeit a costly one. They all have their roles. I suspect it’s not occurring to you that the central issue is having one currency rather than multiple. Fiat Housing < Fiat Utility < Fiat Food < Fiat General < Digital Savings < Gold(commodity money). There is too little gold to serve as commodity money. Oil is too variable for commodity money. It’s possible to crate a basket of commodity money, from all the precious metals. My argument was that (a) crypto cannot serve as money substitute given current tech and costs of computing, (b) that self hosted crypto means the network is institutionally fragile (c) that a monolithic transaction system is faster, less fragile, and unassailable by the state. (d) the state will not tolerate the us of it for the reasons it was invented: drug money. Don’t assume boomer means bias (I’m a jones generation by the way – between boomers and x’s – like bill gates, steve jobs) It might mean (as it does in this case) i know more than you do. ’cause I do. 😉

  • That the ‘aristocracy’ tolerated the invasion of our polity by false promise of

    That the ‘aristocracy’ tolerated the invasion of our polity by false promise of freedom from physical, natural, an evolutionary laws by the marxists, neo-marxists, postmodernists, feminists, and human difference denialists rather than prosecuting them was a catastrophic error.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-23 12:29:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264171692244504577

    Reply addressees: @hugo909 @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264171021160112128


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @hugo909 @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717 That we don’t prosecute men and women for their actions is a choice. That we extend childhood and create the risks for them is an other fact – and is also a choice – without empirical evidence to support the utility or necessity.

    That we thought the 20th ended scarcity is cause.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1264171021160112128

  • That we don’t prosecute men and women for their actions is a choice. That we ext

    That we don’t prosecute men and women for their actions is a choice. That we extend childhood and create the risks for them is an other fact – and is also a choice – without empirical evidence to support the utility or necessity.

    That we thought the 20th ended scarcity is cause.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-23 12:27:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264171021160112128

    Reply addressees: @hugo909 @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264170618246889472


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @hugo909 @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717 That you are a parasite is a fact. That it’s your genetic strategy not a conscious choice is a fact. That you lack agency to know it is a fact. That some of us are neither parasites nor lack the agency is a fact. That some of us can articulate these facts, is a fact.

    Truth is.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1264170618246889472

  • That you are a parasite is a fact. That it’s your genetic strategy not a conscio

    That you are a parasite is a fact. That it’s your genetic strategy not a conscious choice is a fact. That you lack agency to know it is a fact. That some of us are neither parasites nor lack the agency is a fact. That some of us can articulate these facts, is a fact.

    Truth is.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-23 12:25:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264170618246889472

    Reply addressees: @hugo909 @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264170263320633344


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @hugo909 @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717 Righteousness is a moral claim. I simply specialize in reciprocity, and in particular verbal reciprocity that we call testimony: satisfaction of demand for infallibility given the question at hand, given means, motive, and opportunity.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1264170263320633344

  • Sometimes we must choose the lesser of two evils. The lesser of two evils is to

    Sometimes we must choose the lesser of two evils. The lesser of two evils is to flatten the curve by constraining the people who spread the disease: the health care, elder care, and maintenance workers from the rest of society. It was not to shut down all of civilization.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-23 11:47:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264161124016144386

    Reply addressees: @Quillette

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264159237267226625


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Quillette Flattening the curve saves the medical system from overloading. It means marginal cases might not die due to equipment shortages. It doesn’t mean that the frail and elderly won’t die soon. Nor does it mean the coming pain from shutting down the world won’t be a greater suffering.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1264159237267226625

  • Unfortunately it’s a means of social construction of falsehoods by use of virtue

    Unfortunately it’s a means of social construction of falsehoods by use of virtue signal spirals. In other words it’s how christianity, judaism, islam were spread and how marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, human difference denialism was spread: The Religions of Deceit. https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1264037336813318146

  • Unfortunately it’s a means of social construction of falsehoods by use of virtue

    Unfortunately it’s a means of social construction of falsehoods by use of virtue signal spirals. In other words it’s how christianity, judaism, islam were spread and how marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, human difference denialism was spread: The Religions of Deceit.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-23 11:34:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264157712260173824

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264037336813318146

  • Which One of Us Denies God’s Hand?

    Apr 3, 2020, 2:08 AM

    P’s premise is sovereignty reciprocity and testifiability that produce universal calculability in human word and deed. And that faith is by definition and necessity not testifiable. Meaning that one does not bring faith to court. if it isn’t a matter for court, then do as you will. We cannot legislate faith. We can only legislate actions. We can legislate against pseudoscience sophistry and the supernatural to advance frauds. Christianity does not ask us to legislate frauds. judaism, islam, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and human biodiversity denial do ask us to. This is because our civilization has always separated law and religion under trifunctionalism. And as such we deliver unto god and Caesar’s law separately. This competition between material and spiritual has prevented the evils of jewish and muslim religion (deceits), the stagnation of the Hindu (too much mysticism), and the despotism of the Chinese (too much authority), and the crimes of the catholic church (too much corruption). So P continues the tradition of producing law law. And MEASURING DIFFERENT RELIGIONS by their violation of the law. If a religion does not violate the laws of nature, the natural law of man, and the evolutionary law of transcendence, then it does not violate the EVIDENCE of god’s hand in his own writing – the evidence written in the universe- rather than man’s misinterpretation of it. In the test of whether man has misinterpreted god’s intent, lied about god’s intent, the laws of nature, natural law and evolutionary necessity of transcendence allow us, using the evidence of gods’ hand, to determine the errors in religion. There is no error in Jesus’ teachings. It is the scientifically correct optimum. There is plenty of violation of gods laws in the bible. And every political religion (and christianity is a political religion) is far worse than the misinterpretations in the bible that does not come from Jesus’ teachings. The true religions are nature worship and ancestor worship (heathenism), hero worship (paganism), and a political religion of which christianity appears the optimum – at least, as Jesus spoke it not the many many people who have ‘interpreted’ everything other than Jesus’ word. I am bound by the necessities of physical law, the natural law and of evolutionary law of transcendence – because those are the only faultless evidence of god’s word and deed, whether one follows Divine, deist, or naturalist understandings of god. As such if you disagree with my position you must choose the words of men who erred and lied over the words of Jesus and the hand of god written in the hand of god, the physical laws of nature, the natural law of man, and the necessity of evolutionary transcendence. So which one of us denies god? You or me?’

  • THERE IS ONLY ONE CHRISTIAN:

    Apr 10, 2020, 9:18 AM THERE IS ONLY ONE CHRISTIAN: JESUS. AND THE CHURCH WAS AN INVASION AND CONQUEST OF OUR PEOPLE TO TURN WARRIORS INTO SLAVES.

    —“If all the religions were so similar and provided the same product they would have produced similar results. “—

    The point is that group strategy, military, and law influence adults, who are capable of and exercise agency (action) – and religion influences women and children, the weak and the poor who lack agency. Religion provides mindfulness as the first group drags the second group through time. Religions don’t lead – they create mindfulness that prevents defection so that the people may be led, despite the insecurity alienation and anonymity that arises as families, clans, and tribes scale and consolidate into polities.

    —“the faith was built on the natural laws (Gods Laws)”—

    We have discovered THREE sets of god’s laws:

    1. The physical laws of nature (action)
      … 2. The logical laws of consistency (thought)
      … … 3. The grammatical laws of paradigms (speech)
    2. The natural law of reciprocity (cooperation)
      … 5. The christian law of love (seduction into cooperation)
      … … 6. The political law of homogeneity (incentive to insure)

    3. The evolutionary law of transcendence (defeat the red queen).
      … … 8. The … law of self domestication
      … … … 9. The …. law of competition..

    Of this set of God’s laws, what does Christianity DENY? 1. physical laws of nature. 6. the political law of homogeneity 7. the evolutionary law of transcendence 8. the … law of self domestication 9. the … law of competition. What does this mean? Christianity is a feminine religion, because it uses the counter-evolutionary strategy of females. And all female societies die without host males. Just as christians only survive with host Aryans, jews can only survive with host male populations, and Muslims hyper-violate these laws by consuming and destroying those host populations.

    —” looking at historical performance “—

    A monopoly takes credit for the good that would occur in any civilization but not credit for the bad – in economics we learn that we must judge by full accounting, not cherry picking, and account for the seen and unseen, and measure by opportunity cost – the difference between possible choices. Looking at historical performance of the church and christian rome vs aristocracy and literate rome, we have to ask, why did the church choose subjugation supernaturalism, and spreading ignorance rather than militarization, engineering, and spreading literacy as did the roman aristocracy? THe dark ages exist just as much because of the church and religion as it did because of the migration period invasions,made possible by the roman holocaust against the celts. While european aristocracy, military, law, and mythology survived, It took the restoration of (a) viking military, (b) aristotelian reason, (c) north sea trade by first vikings then the hansa (c) literacy (d) then the In the difference between possible choices, there was obvious and necessary utility of an heroic underclass religion to integrate the middle eastern peasantry (tribes, slaves, women) into the pagan pantheon and therefore raise their status to equality in contribution to civilization, and therefore worthy of respect non-existent in the pagan hierarchy that treated them as undomesticated animals, and therefore would no longer be treated as barbarians. The use of this religion as an institution of warfare with which to keep the peasantry ignorant and subservient on one h and, but to undermine the aristocracy through social construction, resistance, and usurpation of power by numbers, just as the marxists-neo-marxists-postmodernists-feminists (jews in this age as in the last) have used immigration, and undermining the aristocratic civilization of the west for the SECOND TIME. So no I don’t give the church credit for the scraps of good that would take place even under the most horridly backward, ignorance producing, and parasitic means of government over the people, trying to reduce them to middle eastern barbarism as a good. Instead i compare what could have been without the church and that means the industrial revolution and a thousand years of ignorance poverty starvation disease and suffering would have been avoided if not for the ignorance-production of the semitic church, and instead, the continuation of the stoic and epicurean and philosophical, and mathematical, and legal, and commercial institutions of the europeans. Myth, Ritual, Oath, Feast, Celebration by Festival, Sport, Theater, Story) (the animal celebration of the rewards of the hunt around the fire) organized into Religion, and some kind of The church destroyed jesus’ message of love and the opportunity of the ancient world to create harmony by the jewish conversion of it into a political weapon of despotic rule, not harmonious like the egyptians, or justificationary like the babylonians, but despotic and hostile and undermining like the jews and arabs. So no. Jesus was the feminine alternative to Achilles – a hero of the poor. And Paul and the rest of the jews turned it into a religion of rebellion and destruction against rome, just as the muslims exacerbated the problem by converting it to a religion of conquest, destruction, and devolution into feminine barbarism – reversing gods law of transcendence of man.