No. It’s not free. The people are not sovereign. And the government has gone fully ideological and self interested at the expense of the population.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-10 00:52:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1822073456680108234
Reply addressees: @PeterSweden7
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821918581388394990
a) Producing quantum effects is not demonstrating USE of quantum effects. The passage of photons or any other energy manipulates the quantum background. In fact all electrochemical transmission manipulates the quantum background. It’s meaningless unless there is some evidence of information transduction. There isn’t any.
b) There is no relevance even if so. It would not need to have any impact on consciousness given consciousness is a relatively simple consequence of sufficient hierarchically organized recursive memory. Consciousness turns out to be relatively simple – if you have enough neurons in relation to body size and in enough of a recursive hierarchy.
Today is another frustrating day, demonstrating why so few public intellectuals participate on social media – because one wastes time debunking nonsense accusations out of mere self defense of one’s posts.
Reply addressees: @ToadOfYuggoth @DwightExMachina @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-06 04:04:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820672149826215936
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820603848223797481
Now, in addition to the right to bear arms for personal, private, and political ends, we need constitutionally mandated:
‘stand your ground’,
‘castle doctrine’,
as well as:
‘initiation of defense’
‘necessity defense’
‘justifiable homicide’,
and to expand:
‘defense of others’, and… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1819806473859567911
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-03 18:45:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1819806721608413449
Our position is that the state, whose primary function consists of the insurer of last resort, has the primary duty to protect the moral from the immoral meaning that the more people who engage in crimes of aggression against life and property who are deported, committed to long term camps, assigned to prisons and asylums, or hung, is the optimum social, economic, political and legal order.
The experiment with levity has been a catastrophe and it’s the responsibility of women voting and the left – where the totality of the purpose of the left is to prevent the moral people from punishing the immoral people and preventing their freedom, their costs, and their reproduction.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-02 00:16:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1819165397079191554
@POTUS: NO, THE SUPREME COURT WILL NEVER CHANGE ITS FUNCTION AND MISSION.
The USA is the only constitutional republic that ALSO has sovereignty of the people and the concurrency of the people by both regions and classes – and NOT the government.
We are the only constitutional republic that prevents the people and the government from enacting harms against one another – because our common law, our constitution, our bill of rights, were derived from natural law – meaning the science of cooperation, meaning individual sovereignty.
And the court exists to defend the constitution and the people, from not only the tyranny of the well meaning fools in government (You) but the tyranny of well meaning fools in the majority of the polity (the left).
As such we are protected by ‘the natural law’, ‘the rights of englishmen’, ‘human rights’, and their codification in a constitution that allows us to overthrow you and replace you if you try to violate that law.
The supreme court is reversing the democratic party’s and their leadership in the radical left’s attempt to circumvent the people, the natural law, the common law, the constitution, and the long history of western civilization to its founding principles discovered on the Steppe: the prohibition on authority by the distribution of sovereignty, reciprocity, contract, duty, excellence, truth, and beauty i to the distributed dictatorship of those demonstrating responsibility to insure those principles with one another.
And there is no person living or dead that will defeat me in this argument.
And if we must end this government as did our ancestors to prevent you from your crimes, we will do so with vigor, and sufficient demonstration, that no one will try again for a thousand years.
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Reply addressees: @POTUS
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-31 02:00:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818466683029221376
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818349589801443672
Invert the question, if math is just another grammar, and all grammars adhere to the universal grammar (language), then the unification of the grammars is possible if we universalize that grammar by reforming each discipline into one universal logic of universal commensurability. If so, then why should the mathematicians any more than the scientists of philosophers base their foundations on that which is false and produces externalities? So in other words, what does math as it is practiced have to do with everything else?
(And yes I realize that this is a subject that is difficult to grasp without rather exhaustive studying the consequences of ‘bad math’. I mean, Descartes restores the european tradition and Einstein and Bohr devolve it again? That’s only possible because the foundations are sets rather than grammars.)
Reply addressees: @matterasmachine @Plinz
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-30 14:59:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818300298512760833
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818281708745363818
NO. WE DO NOT AND WILL NEVER LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY OF MOB RULE
1) We live in a Republic under Rule of Law, and Rule of Law under the Natural Law, where we democratically elect representatives. We do not live in a democracy. Democracies always fail for the same reason: Power, Status, and Attention seeking (you and yours), and irresponsibility and incompetence (people who vote for you) create dependency which sponsors corruption and tyranny that brings nations to their end.
2) If you try to further destroy The Republic, the Rule of Law, Rule of Law by the Natural Law (tort by Sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, excellence, truth), decided by the common law (commonality across classes and regions), and legislated by demand for concurrency (across classes and regions), in the defense of minority rights (those who demonstrate ability and responsibility for the self, family, business, and commons) or undermine their purpose in preserving our individual sovereignty in demonstrated interests (defense from those like you), then there are enough of us to easily bring this government down by force, reconstitute it with amendments, and legislation, and to restore those rights, obligations, inalienations, and prevent you and those like you from destroying the reason for the radical success of the west versus the rest: “the institutionalization in all walks of life of individual responsibility for personal private and common.” This alone is what makes high trust european civilization and it’s unique production of commons possible.
And if we must replace this government, then we must do so such that no one again dares what you have dared for ten thousand years.
I founded The Natural Law Institute for the purpose of protecting our people and our civilization and by externality mankind from the cancer of your petty, power-seeking, ignorance and arrogance.
And I am but one man among millions who would gladly face the noose rather than suffer the consequences of ignorant, arrogant, well meaning fools.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @JoeBiden
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-30 00:12:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818077275348189184
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818048146238230704
Q: –“Why has no one made a humanist ideology that acts as a surrogate religion.”–
CORRECT ANSWER:
1) What we call religions consist of ritual construction of neural relations that serve as a means of uncertainty and suppression alienation exaggerated by our degree of neuroticism (sensitivity to negative emotions).
2) Religions and Religious Substitutes require Myths (framings that contextualize experience and understanding), rituals (means of repetitious reinforcement), social reinforcement (disalienation reinforcement), because the purpose of religion is compensation for alienation that increases rather rapidly as post-hunter-gatherer society increases, and the continuous social reinforcement at every moment of the day decreases.
3) The means of social reinforcement must be available to the individuals who pursue the set of ‘myths’, ‘rituals’ and ‘social reinforcement’.
4) As such as human ability, knowledge, understanding increase, then we should and do experience the emergence of a spectrum of ‘religion’ that provides accessibility to the broad spectrum of human psychological vulnerabilities, intellectual capacity, and education sufficient to grasp the mythology, method, and a population sufficient to reinforce it.
5) stoicism is the optimum religion (the collection of the ‘greek way’) however it is unavailable to the empathic, neurotic, ignorant, unsuccessful, and undisciplined). Christianity is accessible with little other than ritual repetition. Same for Islam. Yet christianity is currently practiced as an entire spectrum from humanist down to fundamentalist, and even the unstructured occultist.
6) So we have produced humanist variations on both the greek (stoic) and christian (secular humanist) versions but because the demands of the classes and sexes vary it is not yet possible to form organically a religion as we have in the past.
7) As such the next ‘religion’ will require intentional training (costly) which will require state institutional support and indoctrination and it will be very close to the combination of cognitive behavioral therapy (real world actions of desensitization) stoicism (ritual virtues of self regulation and self improvement), christianity(elimination of hatred, extension of kinship love, personal acts of charity at personal expense, and exhaustion of forgiveness before retaliation.)
8) As I have stated repeatedly the only non false religion is the natural religion to which the Japanese have preserved the surviving example: Nature, State (only nation state), Hero, and Ancestor worship, where worship consist of thanks for the transfer of capital from the past to the present – because we are in fact indebted to nature, state, hero, and ancestor. In that model god (simple anthropomorphism) and nature (more abstract anthropomorphism) are synonymous.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-27 21:55:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817317796172230656
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817254988084838891
Facts tend to be RIGHT leaning. The only problem on the right is the religious fundamentalists. They are right on the morals even if wrong on the history and cause. But the problem on the left is the biological and cognitive science denialists – they are wrong on the morals AND…
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-26 17:13:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1816884468864491590
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1816877071307845915
Where do you get that nonsense?
Republicans demand individual responsibility and only tolerate charity in the case of support for responsibility even if one lacks ability. Democrats demand evasion of responsibility and demand charity despite the evasion of responsibility.
The difference between the sexes, and the difference between the moral biases, and the difference between the parties now that women are fully integrated into polity economy and origination of family, is the feminine and progressive demand for subsidy of and of commons despite evading responsibility for the cost of those behavioral and physical commons thus encouraging degeneration of responsibility ability and trust, vs the masculine and conservative demand for production and capitalization and responsibility for those informational, behavioral, and physical commons.
Note that no feminine consumptive irresponsible society has ever survived for more than a moment in time, and never can. Not only is it impossible, it is merely hyperconsumption of locusts on the commons, and, devolutionary and dysgenic.
Because society and civilization consist of the production of the demand for the maximization of individual responsibility for private and common.
The left is either Virtue Signaling, Responsibility Evading, Or Parasitic depending upon class.
And left discourse is nothing more than the institutional means by which the feminine and the abrahamic and the marxist claim victimhood as a false pretence by which to escape the costs of constructing and maintaining civilization.
Reply addressees: @Captain_Potcard @David_Leavitt @elonmusk
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-21 22:30:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1815152311770976257
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1815055686725779521